Is one-and-a-half better than two?

The so-called "one-and-a-half" ventricular repair: where are we after 40 years?

OBJECTIVES

The indications, timing, and results of the so-called "one-and-a-half ventricle repair", as a surgical alternative to the creation of the Fontan circulation, or high-risk biventricular repair, currently remain nebulous. We aimed to clarify these issues.

METHODS

We reviewed a total of 201 investigations, assessing selection of candidates, the need for atrial septal fenestration, the fate of an unligated azygos vein and free pulmonary regurgitation, the concerns regarding reverse pulsatile flow in the superior caval vein, the growth potential and function of the subpulmonary ventricle, and the role of the superior cavopulmonary connections as an interstage procedure prior to biventricular repair, or as a salvage procedure. We also assessed subsequent eligibility for conversion to biventricular repair and long-term functional results.

RESULTS

Reported operative mortalities ranged from 3% to 20%, depending on the era of surgical repair with 7% risk of complications due to a pulsatile superior caval vein, up to one-third incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias, and a small risk of anastomotic takedown of the superior cavopulmonary connection. Actuarial survival was between 80% and 90% at 10 years, with two-thirds of patients in good shape after 20 years. We found no reported instances of plastic bronchitis, protein-losing enteropathy, or hepatic cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The so-called "one-and-a-half ventricular repair", which is better described as production of one-and-a-half circulations can be performed as a definitive palliative procedure with an acceptable risk similar to that of conversion to the Fontan circulation. The operation reduces the surgical risk for biventricular repair and reverses the Fontan paradox.

Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance on the Hemodynamics of Reoperation After Failure of One and a Half Ventricle Repair

OBJECTIVE

The one and a half ventricle repair (1.5VR) is a common clinical choice for patients with right heart dysfunction. Considering the influence of blood circulation failure and reoperation in urgent need, this essay aims to explore the hemodynamic effects of different pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) values on reoperation after 1.5VR failure.

METHODS

The lumped parameter model (LPM) was used to simulate the reoperation, including the return biventricular repair (2VR), ligation of azygos vein (1.5VR') and return single ventricular repair (1.0VR). Firstly, the debugging parameters were used to simulate the hemodynamics of 2VR. Secondly, the value of PVR was changed from one to four times while the other parameters remained unchanged. Finally, 15 cardiac cycles were simulated and the 15th result was obtained. In this work, the left and right ventricular stroke work and their sum (Plv, Prv, Ptotal), the left and right ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, RVEF), the mean Cardiac Output (mCO) and the mean pressure and flow-rate ratio of superior and inferior vena cava (mPsvc\mPivc and mQsvc\mQivc), respectively, were used to describe the hemodynamics of reoperation.

RESULTS

With the change of PVR from one to four times, the values of Plv, Prv, Ptotal, LVEF, and RVEF gradually decreased. The change rate of Plv, Ptotal and LVEF of 1.0VR were the largest in the three kinds of reoperation. The change rate of Prv of 1.5VR' was larger than that of 2VR, but it was the opposite for their EF change rate. The mCO of 2VR, 1.5VR', and 1.0VR decreased by 18.53%, 37.58%, and 48.07%, respectively. The mPsvc\mPivc of 1.5VR' increased from 3.76 to 6.77 and the mQsvc\mQivc decreased from 0.55 to 0.36, while the mPsvc\mPivc and mQsvc\mQivc of 2VR and 1.0VR remained 1 and 0.67, respectively. The peak value of the tricuspid flow-rate (Qti) waveform of 2VR and 1.5VR' changed from "E peak" to "A peak."

CONCLUSION

The numerical results demonstrate the highly reoperation-dependent hemodynamic consequences and their responses to variations in PVR. Comprehensive analysis of EF, mCO and ventricular stroke work indicates that PVR has a greater impact on 1.5VR' and 1.0VR. Therefore, we suggest that the selection strategy of reoperation should focus on PVR.