The associations of clinicians' implicit attitudes about race with medical visit communication and patient ratings of interpersonal care

Implicit and Explicit Race and Weight Biases Among Physician Assistant Preceptors and Trainees

INTRODUCTION

As new equity, diversity, and inclusion programs emerge in physician assistant/associate (PA) education, there is a need to assess baseline levels of implicit and explicit biases among PA preceptors' and trainees. The objectives of this study were (1) to measure implicit and explicit race (Black/White) and weight (fat/thin) biases among PA preceptors and trainees and (2) to identify potential gaps in PA preceptor and trainee education.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of PA preceptors and trainees from one program operating in several US states; implicit and explicit race and antifat biases and receipt of prior education were measured.

RESULTS

Preceptor response rate was 6.4% (N = 78) from an eligible population of 1222, and trainee response rate was 25.7% (n = 43) from an eligible population of 167. Sixty-eight preceptor participants (87.2%) and 23 trainees (53.5%) identified as White. Preceptors held strong (Cohen d = 0.81), and trainees held moderate (Cohen d = 0.43) pro-White implicit bias. Overall, preceptors and trainees held little and no explicit race bias (Cohen d = 0.18 and d = 0.0, respectively). Preceptors and trainees held strong implicit antifat bias (Cohen d = 1.24 and Cohen d = 0.76). Preceptors held moderate explicit antifat bias (Cohen d = 0.65); trainees held strong explicit antifat bias (Cohen d = 0.95). Trainees received significantly more education on working with diverse populations compared with preceptors (100% vs. 57.7%, P < 0.001) and working with patients who are overweight (74.4% vs. 41.0%, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Implicit race and antifat bias exists among our sample of PA preceptors and trainees. A gap in education for preceptors on working with diverse populations and patients who are overweight was identified. Future research should address both.

Disproportionate Enforcement of a Hospital's Safe Sleep Policy for Racial and Ethnic Minority Families

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the enforcement of a staff-initiated children's hospital safe sleep policy for evidence of systemic racism.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective medical record review of staff-initiated safe sleep policy enactments was performed. Demographic data of infants aged 12 months or younger with an unsafe sleep event (USE) documented in the electronic health record were compared with logistic regression to infants without USEs. Time to escalation of USEs was analyzed using survival analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to compare median number of warnings and outcomes of escalation for each demographic group.

RESULTS

Of 233 infants with USEs, a disproportionate number were Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (52%) compared with infants without USEs (23% NHB) (P < .01). When adjusting for confounding variables, NHB infants were 2.42 times more likely to have an USE compared with Non-Hispanic white (NHW) infants (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.63-3.58; P < .01). NHW infants had a significantly longer median time between first and second warnings compared with all other groups (P < .01), and the time to fourth warning for NHW infants was over 6 times that for NHB infants. The only instances of USEs that escalated to hospital security involved NHB infants.

CONCLUSION

Disparities suggestive of systemic racism were identified in the enforcement of a children's hospital safe sleep policy. For hospitals looking to adopt or revise safe sleep policies, the authors suggest careful consideration of potential impacts on already systemically marginalized families. We suggest replacing punitive consequences of policy nonadherence with interventions to facilitate behavior change in the hospital and after discharge.

Physical Features Contributing to Gender Dysphoria: The Role of Voice

OBJECTIVE

Features that cause gender incongruence (gender identity not aligning with assumptions based on sex assigned at birth) in transgender individuals often motivate them to seek out gender-affirming treatments. Voice has rarely been included as a major contributor to gender dysphoria. The primary objective of this study is to understand the significance of dysphoria related to voice compared to dysphoria secondary to other features.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective population-based survey study.

SETTING

Social media.

METHODS

The survey requested a ranking of features that contribute to gender dysphoria, whether the features were bothersome due to external or internal perception, and self-reported ideal order for pursuing gender-affirming treatments. The categories of features that were ranked included upper body, lower body, face, neck, voice, and height.

RESULTS

In total, 79% of respondents experience gender incongruence secondary to their voice. Voice was the second most important feature contributing to gender dysphoria, only after upper body. In transgender men (29.4%) and transgender women (25%), voice was both the second most important feature contributing to gender dysphoria and the second most important intervention to alleviate gender dysphoria. Specifically, vocal incongruence is largely due to perception by others, as opposed to lower body which contributes to incongruence due to perception by self.

CONCLUSION

Voice is the second most common contributor to gender dysphoria after upper body. Due to self-rated importance of voice to gender incongruence, health care providers must be aware that voice interventions are critical to improve gender dysphoria experienced by transgender individuals.

Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular disease

Mahatma Gandhi once famously said: "poverty is the worst type of violence". He was referring to the state of political and social unrest that was pervading his nation, and the impact that humiliating defeat had on those who suffered in dire straits. Today, there is mounting evidence that social disparities cause intense psychosocial stress on those on whom they are imposed and can result in adverse cardiovascular outcomes. In modern society we still witness large disparities in living conditions between races, regions, continents and nations. Even in more privileged nations, we often witness the existence of "food and social deserts" in the middle of large urban centers. Sizable segments of the population are deprived of the comforts and privileges enjoyed by others; food quality and choices are limited, opportunities to exercise and play are scarce or unsafe, physical and verbal violence are prevalent, and racially driven conflicts are frequent. It has become apparent that these conditions predispose to the development of cardiovascular disease and affect its outcome negatively. Besides the increase in incidence of traditional risk factors, such as smoking, hypertension, insulin resistance and obesity, several other pathophysiological mechanisms involving the neuro-endocrine, inflammatory and immune pathways may be responsible for the noted negative outcomes. In this manuscript we review some of the evidence linking social distress with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and the potential subtending mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.

Exploring the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Self-directed Approach to Identifying Health Priorities in a Sample of Southern Older African American Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cultural acceptability and feasibility of the self-directed "My Health Priorities" (MHP) web-based program in older Southern African Americans (AAs) with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) and their family caregivers (FCGs).

DESIGN

A multi-method formative evaluation study (NIH Stage 1a) to explore patients' and FCGs' experiences with the MHP web-based program, a component of the patient priorities care approach. Interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative method and thematic analysis. Participants rated usability via the system usability scale (SUS) (scores range from 0 to 100). Sample characteristics were analyzed using SAS and SPSS.

SETTING

A primary care clinic in a southeastern U.S. academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen older AAs with MCCs (≥ 65 years old, diagnosed with ≥ 2 chronic conditions) and their adult AA FCGs (≥ 18 years old).

RESULTS

Participants generally found the program acceptable but difficult to navigate on devices other than computers. Suggestions included redesigning the avatar for cultural relevance, optimizing functionality for mobile devices, and offering strategies to address challenging patient-clinician interactions. Patients rated usability at 75.31 ± 14.63 (good usability), while FCGs rated it at 30.13 ± 4.31 (indicating limited usability). Study measures required 30 min to complete, while the intervention took 60 min. Participants completed 81% of study measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Established web-based programs may be acceptable to AA patients and their caregivers, but specific technical and content aspects may need to be revised to make the programs more suitable for AAs. Design refinements should account for the differing usability experiences reported by AA patients and their caregivers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05129709.

Toward Automated Detection of Biased Social Signals from the Content of Clinical Conversations

Implicit bias can impede patient-provider interactions and lead to inequities in care. Raising awareness is key to reducing such bias, but its manifestations in the social dynamics of patient-provider communication are difficult to detect. In this study, we used automated speech recognition (ASR) and natural language processing (NLP) to identify social signals in patient-provider interactions. We built an automated pipeline to predict social signals from audio recordings of 782 primary care visits that achieved 90.1% average accuracy across codes, and exhibited fairness in its predictions for white and non-white patients. Applying this pipeline, we identified statistically significant differences in provider communication behavior toward white versus non-white patients. In particular, providers expressed more patient-centered behaviors towards white patients including more warmth, engagement, and attentiveness. Our study underscores the potential of automated tools in identifying subtle communication signals that may be linked with bias and impact healthcare quality and equity.

Attachment as a Primary Mechanism in Physician Cognition and Bias During Complex Medical Cases: A Narrative Review

Introduction

In recent decades, improvements in diagnostic accuracy in medical cases have been minimal despite rapid advancements in technology. Moreover, in complex cases, diagnostic accuracy remains a significant challenge, often reflecting practices from the 18th and 19th centuries. This comprehensive narrative review explores how cognitive bias may act as a critical, yet neglected, factor contributing to the persistent diagnostic error rate.

Methods

A narrative review of the literature was conducted through a search of the George Washington University library databases and Google Scholar to identify studies related to physician cognition, complex medical diagnosis, and cognitive error.

Results

This review synthesizes existing literature to propose a theoretical framework explaining how cognitive error, clinician cognition, tolerance of uncertainty, and attachment theory interact to influence the formation of cognitive bias at the cost of diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.

Discussion

It is not only necessary for clinicians to focus on a patient's words, symptoms, or data to improve diagnostic accuracy, but also for clinicians to relate to others' distress through their own attachment styles: technology's critical blind spot. Clinicians with insecure attachment styles may struggle with metacognition, exhibit lower cognitive flexibility, have reduced tolerance for uncertainty, experience lower thresholds for cognitive load, and rely more heavily on heuristics, leading to an increased likelihood of cognitive error during complex medical cases. This theory provides a foundation for further research into how attachment influences clinician decision-making and diagnostic performance while also highlighting how medical education may reinforce these patterns.

Do Patient-Provider Therapeutic Connections Vary by Race or Ethnicity? A Comparison of Black, White, and Hispanic/Latino Patient Experiences

GOAL

This study aimed to determine whether patients who identify as Black/African-American or Hispanic/Latino have different expectations for and experiences of therapeutic connections (TCs) with care providers, compared to those who identify as non-Hispanic White. Although race-based health disparities have been recognized in the United States for decades, efforts to reduce them have yielded inconsistent results. Early evidence suggests that high-quality TCs have important impacts on patient outcomes, which could help explain the persistence of certain disparities.

METHODS

Primary data were collected during a field study that recruited patients from across the U.S. (N = 1,598). We used a cross-sectional online survey of non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and Hispanic or Latino (any race) adults who had a healthcare encounter in the previous six months. The sampling strategy oversampled Black and Hispanic/Latino patients and balanced respondents across age groups. The survey asked respondents questions about their expectations for ideal TCs, TC experiences, and satisfaction with their main care provider. Our large sample enabled subgroup analyses that examined the experiences of those with certain intersectional identities (e.g., race and gender). Variables were examined using omnibus analysis of variance with Fisher's least significant difference post hoc tests to compare specific groups.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There were no differences between groups regarding their expectations for ideal TCs. There were, however, differences by race/ethnicity in TC experiences and satisfaction. Differences were more prevalent in subgroup analyses. Chronic conditions, gender, and racial concordance with the provider mattered for some measures but not for others. Generally, Hispanic or Latino patients reported significantly lower levels of experienced TCs.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Understanding the differences in experiences of care and patient satisfaction by race/ethnicity can facilitate the cultivation of targeted interventions and policies aimed at addressing disparities in healthcare delivery and further promote equitable care for all patients. Nevertheless, more must be done to understand what might lead to poorer TCs for some who identify with marginalized groups and whether poorer TCs lead to poorer health outcomes.

Racial equity in and through medical interaction scholarship: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic scoping review to characterize the landscape of communication scholarship within racial health equity in and through the patient-provider interaction.

METHODS

We employed three waves of data collection to identify relevant articles (N = 454) about racial equity within provider-patient interactions. We iteratively developed a codebook concerning article characteristics, coding for journal names, data source, descriptive characteristics for the study samples, and presence of theory and equity in sections of the manuscripts.

RESULTS

This search identified studies (N = 206) that were published in 76 peer-reviewed scientific journals. The majority of studies reported primary data analyses and used survey and interview methodology. Many studies examined participants as patients generally rather than in reference to particular health conditions. Among those with a specific health condition, the largest proportion focused on cancer control. Very few studies included samples with Native American and Pacific Island heritage. Most studies included cisgender men and/or women, but none included transgender men or women. The vast majority of research focused on the patient experience; few centered on providers' and caregivers' experiences. The body of scholarship was largely atheoretical; the most frequently noted constructs were patient-provider communication (including patient-centered communication and patient-centered care), implicit/explicit racial bias, shared decision-making. There was wide variation in the extent to which equity was woven through the manuscripts. Equity is typically mentioned in the literature review, and racial identity in the sample may serve as a marker of racialized experiences.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the need for the development of theory that elevates the centrality of health equity to attend to the bi- or multi-directional flow of communication that shapes the quality of these interactions.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These insights can serve as a strong foundation for the development of interventions to address equity in clinical interactions.

Developing Digital Mental Health Tools With Culturally Diverse Parents and Young People: Qualitative User-Centered Design Study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 39% of young people (aged 16-24 y) experience mental ill health, but only 23% seek professional help. Early intervention is essential for reducing the impacts of mental illness, but young people, particularly those from culturally diverse communities, report experiencing shame and stigma, which can deter them from engaging with face-to-face services. Digital mental health (DMH) tools promise to increase access, but there is a lack of literature exploring the suitability of DMH tools for culturally diverse populations.

OBJECTIVE

The project was conducted in partnership with a large-scale national DMH organization that promotes evidence-based early intervention, treatment, and support of mental health in young people and their families. The organization wanted to develop a self-directed web-based platform for parents and young people that integrates psychological assessments and intervention pathways via a web-based "check-in" tool. Our project explored the views of culturally diverse parents and young people on the opportunities and barriers to engagement with a web-based DMH screening tool.

METHODS

We conducted a 2-phase qualitative study aiming to identify potential issues faced by culturally diverse communities when engaging with DMH tools designed for the Australian public. We worked with 18 culturally diverse participants (parents: n=8, 44%; young people: n=10, 56%) in a series of design-led workshops drawing on methods from speculative design and user experience to understand the opportunities and barriers that organizations might face when implementing population-level DMH tools with culturally diverse communities. NVivo was used to conduct thematic analyses of the audio-recorded and transcribed workshop data.

RESULTS

Five themes were constructed from the workshops: (1) trust in the use and application of a DMH tool, (2) data management and sharing, (3) sociocultural influences on mental health, (4) generational differences in mental health and digital literacy, and (5) stigma and culturally based discrimination in mental health support.

CONCLUSIONS

The emergent themes have important considerations for researchers wishing to develop more inclusive DMH tools. The study found that healthy parent-child relationships will increase engagement in mental health support for young persons from culturally diverse backgrounds. Barriers to engagement with DMH tools included culturally based discrimination, the influence of culture on mental health support, and the potential impact of a diagnostic label on help seeking. The study's findings suggest a need for culturally safe psychoeducation for culturally diverse end users that fosters self-determination with tailored resources. They also highlight important key challenges when working with culturally diverse populations.

Effects of Implicit Racial Bias and Standardized Patient Race on Genetic Counseling Students' Patient-Centered Communication

Clinician racial bias has been associated with less patient-centered communication, but little is known about how it affects trainees' communication. We investigated genetic counseling students' communication during sessions with Black or White standardized patients (SPs) and the extent to which communication was associated with SP race or student scores on the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Sixty students conducted a baseline SP session and up to two follow-up sessions. Students were randomly assigned to a different White or Black SP and one of three clinical scenarios for each session. Fifty-six students completed the IAT. Session recordings were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Linear regression models assessed the effects of IAT score and SP race on a variety of patient-centered communication indicators. Random intercept models assessed the within-student effects of SP race on communication outcomes during the baseline session and in follow-up sessions (n = 138). Students were predominantly White (71%). Forty students (71%) had IAT scores indicating some degree of pro-White implicit preference. Baseline sessions with White relative to Black SPs had higher patient-centeredness scores. Within-participant analyses indicate that students used a higher proportion of back-channels (a facilitative behavior that cues interest and encouragement) and conducted longer sessions with White relative to Black SPs. Students' stronger pro-White IAT scores were associated with using fewer other facilitative statements during sessions with White relative to Black SPs. Different patterns of communication associated with SP race and student IAT scores were found for students than those found in prior studies with experienced clinicians.

Identifying characteristics associated with genetic testing in the NICU

Genetic testing is an integral part of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) care. There are reported disparities in both NICU care and genetic testing related to race and language spoken. Identifying characteristics associated with genetic testing in NICUs could help detect patients who may benefit from genetic testing, as well as any current disparities. We sought to analyze characteristics of NICU admits who had genetic testing in general and specific test categories. Characteristics were requested from the Children's Hospital Neonatal Consortium database for patients admitted to Primary Children's Hospital's NICU in 2022. Statistical analysis was performed to determine if characteristics were more likely to result in genetic testing and if differences between those with genetic testing and those without were significant. All genetic test types were more likely ordered with genetic consultations. Cytogenetic testing was more likely in patients with a cardiology consult or who were Spanish-speaking. Patients who were of Hispanic origin were more likely to have molecular testing ordered. The average number of specialty consults for a patient was higher for those with genetic testing. Premature and low birthweight infants had longer time to genetic test ordering. No disparities were identified, which could be due to a small, homogenous sample. The differences with Spanish-speaking patients and those with mothers of Hispanic origin could be due to many factors, including consenting practices. It may be difficult to identify infants who might need genetic testing when they are low birthweight and/or premature. It is important to continue monitoring for differences in ordering practice for this vulnerable population.

The Role of Sociodemographic Characteristics and Social Determinants of Health in Influencing the Perceived Quality of Patient-Provider Communication

Background: Patient-centered communication is a critical process in high-quality healthcare that emphasizes the reciprocal sharing of information between providers and patients to ensure care aligns with the patient's needs, preferences, and personal values. A significant challenge arises from the healthcare provider's time constraints during clinical encounters and the lack of adequate training on how to adopt a patient-centered communication style that addresses patient concerns, making it difficult to foster an environment conducive to shared decision making. These issues are further exacerbated by cultural and language barriers, along with low levels of health literacy and social determinants of health (SDoHs), which complicate efforts to deliver patient-centered care. Objective: This study examined quality criteria for patient-provider communication (PPC) and their associations with sociodemographic characteristics and SDoHs on housing, transportation, and food insecurity. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-6) national dataset. Associations between PPC and sociodemographic variables were tested using the chi-squared test. Binary logistic regression was carried out to examine the association between three PPC criteria and each of the sociodemographic characteristics and patient comfort in disclosing information on SDoHs. Results: Bivariate analyses showed statistically significant associations for age, occupation status, marital status, Hispanic origin, and race across all three PPC criteria. Significant associations were reported for education and income for the two criteria related to being given the chance to ask questions and being involved in healthcare decisions. Finally, significant associations were reported for all PPC criteria and patient comfort levels in discussing SDoHs. Conclusions: Findings from this paper provide insight for enhancing the quality of PCC in underserved populations, particularly when it comes to informing the design of evidence-based cervical cancer screening interventions which are culturally centered around the patients' needs and that integrate PPC as a foundational component.

Racial Disparities in Doctor-Patient Communication: Examining Doctors' Encounters with Black and White Patients

Healthcare disparities persist in the USA, with Black patients often receiving lower-quality care. Effective doctor-patient communication is crucial for influencing satisfaction, adherence to treatment, and overall health outcomes. This study examined racial disparities in doctor-patient communication, focusing on encounters with Black and White patients recently diagnosed with myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS). Thirty-seven oncologists participated in simulated encounters with trained actors portraying either Black or White patients. Using an innovative approach combining the comparison of communication characteristics, thematic content, and linguistic analyses, we observed significant disparities in time allocation, linguistic complexity, and relation-building efforts. Encounters with Black patients were notably shorter, with doctors using fewer words per sentence, asking fewer questions, and employing less inclusive and optimistic language. Doctors also had less thorough discussions about transplant options and used fewer words communicating authenticity when talking with Black patients. The post-encounter surveys revealed that doctors were not aware of their shortcomings when interacting with Black patients. The findings provide important insights for the development of training programs aimed at improving healthcare outcomes for marginalized communities and reducing racial healthcare disparities.

Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion-Related Curricular Elements in Entry-Level Physical Therapist Education: A Delphi Study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this Delphi study was to determine whether experts in justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) in the field of physical therapy could achieve consensus on the key JEDI-related curricular content topics to be included in entry-level physical therapist education.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Inequities exist at all levels of health care for historically underserved populations, including referrals, access, and quality of physical therapy services. The physical therapy field is facing challenges and opportunities in how to best prepare providers to address individual, community, and population health inequities. There is a lack of consensus in physical therapist education regarding essential curricular content related to justice, equity, diversity, inclusion, and antiracism.

SUBJECTS

Eighty-four experts in JEDI in the physical therapy profession were invited through email to participate in the Delphi process.

METHODS

A Delphi survey brought together 39 identified experts in justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion within the field of physical therapy to reach consensus on key JEDI-related curricular topics in physical therapist education. In the first-round survey, participants answered an open-ended question: "What JEDI-related curricular content should be included in entry-level physical therapist education?" The work team coded these free-text responses to populate an initial list of curricular elements. Over 2 subsequent rounds of surveys, the experts came to a consensus on which curricular elements should be addressed within physical therapist education. Nineteen experts completed all survey rounds.

RESULTS

In round I, coding of the expert group's responses generated 61 initial JEDI-related curricular elements. By round III, the group refined the list to 43 curricular elements; 41 of the 43 (95%) elements garnered 94% or higher consensus. The expert group deemed 30 of the elements "entry-level" content and 13 as more "advanced practice" topics.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Experts had a strong consensus on key JEDI-related curricular elements that physical therapist education programs should include to best prepare providers to improve the health of society. Future scholarship will explore recommendations for how physical therapist education programs might prioritize and implement JEDI-related content.

Patterns of outpatient antibiotic prescribing in older adults by social determinants of healthcare access: a population-based retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Strategies to improve antibiotic use may exacerbate health inequities if they do not consider existing barriers to healthcare access. We examined associations between social determinants of healthcare access (SDOH) and antibiotic prescribing and variations in these associations pre- and post-COVID-19 emergence.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged ≥66 years in Ontario, Canada, between March 2018 and March 2020 (pre-pandemic period) and March 2020 and March 2022 (pandemic period). Multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to examine associations between three SDOH variables (neighbourhood-level income and proportion racialized, and individual-level recent immigration) and incident antibiotic prescriptions, accounting for mortality as a competing risk. We assessed for potential effect modification by the pandemic period.

RESULTS

The pre-pandemic (n = 2 567 382) and pandemic (n = 2 744 337) cohorts were similar in average age (75 years). Antibiotic prescribing was slightly higher among residents in the highest income neighbourhoods in pre-pandemic (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.04], compared with lowest income) and pandemic (sHR, 1.02 [1.01-1.03]) periods. Prescribing was higher among recent immigrants (vs. long-term residents) in both periods, with a more pronounced difference observed during the pandemic (sHR, 1.21 [1.18-1.25]) than pre-pandemic (sHR, 1.12 [1.09-1.16]) period. Prescribing was lower among residents living in the most diverse neighbourhoods (vs. least diverse) in both periods, with a more pronounced difference during the pandemic (sHR, 0.81 [0.80-0.82]) than pre-pandemic (sHR, 0.92 [0.91-0.93]) period.

DISCUSSION

SDOH variables are associated with antibiotic prescribing patterns over time among older outpatients, and the COVID-19 pandemic further modified some of these associations.

Increased Time to Fixation After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Influenced by Race and Insurance Status

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

Although the optimal timing of surgical intervention for traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is controversial, early intervention has been recognized as being beneficial in several studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the socioeconomic factors that may delay time to surgical fixation in the management of TSCI.

METHODS

The present study utilized the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) dataset to identify patients aged greater than 18 undergoing spinal fusion for TSCI from 2007-2016. Patients were divided into subgroups based on race and insurance types. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare time to procedure based on race and payer type while adjusting for demographic and injury-specific factors. Significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Using multivariable analysis, Hispanic and Black patients were associated with significantly increased time to fixation of 12.1 h (95% CI 5.5-18.7, P < .001), and 20.1 h (95% CI 12.1-28.1, P < .001), respectively compared to White patients. Other cohorts based on racial status did not have significantly different times to fixation (P > .05). Medicaid was associated with an increased time to fixation compared to private insurance (11.6 h, 95% CI 3.9-19.2, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Black and Hispanic race and Medicaid were associated with statistically significant increases in time to fixation following TSCI, potentially compromising quality of patient care and resulting in poorer outcomes. More research is needed to elucidate this relationship and ensure equitable care is being delivered.

To what extent should doctors communicate diagnostic uncertainty with their patients? An empirical ethics vignette study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although diagnostic uncertainty is common, patient-focused research examining its communication is lacking. We aimed to determine patient preferences for the communication of diagnostic uncertainty, and examine the effects of such communication on patients.

METHODS

We applied an empirical ethics approach, integrating the data collected with ethical analysis to form normative recommendations about diagnostic uncertainty communication. In this randomised crossover study, n=111 members of the public sequentially watched two video vignettes depicting either high or low communicated diagnostic uncertainty, in one of two clinical scenarios. After watching videos, participants completed online questionnaires. Primary outcome was preferred video (high vs low communicated uncertainty); secondary outcomes included satisfaction, trust, worry and understanding. Quantitative data were analysed using logistic regression and a linear mixed effects model; qualitative data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis demonstrated that participants preferred greater diagnostic uncertainty communication, even though these vignettes were more worrying. Qualitative data revealed heterogeneous participant views justifying their communication preferences. These data raise issues relating to how doctors might balance harms versus benefits in diagnostic uncertainty communication and how doctors might communicate in the face of heterogeneous patient information preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

We argue that doctors should err on the side of greater diagnostic uncertainty communication: to not do so (eg, based on benign paternalistic ideas about avoiding patient worry) or to do so variably (eg, based on unevidenced assumptions about patient information preferences) risks depriving patients of information they may value and may create or exacerbate inequalities.

Racial disparities in intrapartum care experiences and birth hospital characteristics

Policymakers and researchers have posited intrapartum care as a potential mediator of racial inequities in perinatal outcomes. However, few studies have measured patient-centered quality of intrapartum care or explored differences by race. To address this gap, we developed a survey supplement using cognitive interviewing and administered it to a probability-based race-stratified random sample of people who recently gave birth in Wisconsin in 2020, including oversamples of non-Hispanic Black and Indigenous birthing people. We estimate overall and race-specific prevalences of intrapartum care experiences and use survey-weighted mixed effects ordinal and logistic regression to estimate differences in intrapartum care experiences by race/ethnicity and hospital characteristics. We find significant racial differences in the population prevalence of negative experiences of intrapartum care providers, including disrespect, lack of responsiveness, inclusion in decision-making about care, and pressure to use epidural analgesia. In unadjusted models, both non-Hispanic Indigenous (American Indian/Alaska Native) and non-Hispanic Black respondents had higher odds (than non-Hispanic White birthing people) of reporting several negative intrapartum experiences, including feeling disrespected by providers and experiencing a lower level of care team responsiveness. In adjusted models, Indigenous respondents had significantly higher odds of reporting that intrapartum care providers withheld information, showed disrespect, and were less responsive. Giving birth at a low birth-volume hospital was associated with higher odds of reporting greater participation in decision-making. CONCLUSION: While all birthing people are entitled to respectful and person-centered care, in practice, Indigenous and Black birthing persons are more likely than their white counterparts to endure negative intrapartum experiences including disrespect and lack of responsiveness to their needs. Equitable implementation of person-centered care principles will require concerted efforts to institutionalize practices that preserve patient dignity and autonomy.

Racial, Socioeconomic, and Geographic Disparities in Preamputation Vascular Care for Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Black patients, those with low socioeconomic status (SES), and those living in rural areas have elevated rates of major lower extremity amputation, which may be related to a lack of subspecialty chronic limb-threatening ischemia care. We evaluated the association between race, rurality, SES, and preamputation vascular care.

METHODS

Among patients aged 66 to 86 years with fee-for-service Medicare who underwent major lower extremity amputation for chronic limb-threatening ischemia from July 2010 to December 2019, we compared the proportion who received vascular care in the 12 months before amputation by race (Black versus White), rurality, and SES (dual eligibility for Medicaid versus no dual eligibility) using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates.

RESULTS

Among 73 237 patients who underwent major lower extremity amputation, 40 320 (55.1%) had an outpatient vascular subspecialist visit, 60 109 (82.1%) had lower extremity arterial testing, and 28 345 (38.7%) underwent lower extremity revascularization in the year before amputation. Black patients were less likely to have an outpatient vascular specialist visit (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.84-0.90]) or revascularization (adjOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.93]) than White patients. Compared with patients without low SES or residing in urban areas, patients with low SES or residing in rural areas were less likely to have an outpatient vascular specialist visit (adjOR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.60-0.64]; low SES versus nonlow SES; adjOR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.79-0.85]; rural versus urban), lower extremity arterial testing (adjOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.75-0.81]; low SES versus nonlow SES; adjOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.0.86-0.94]; rural versus urban), or revascularization (adjOR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.63-0.67]; low SES versus nonlow SES; adjOR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.93]; rural versus urban).

CONCLUSIONS

Black race, rural residence, and low SES are associated with failure to receive subspecialty chronic limb-threatening ischemia care before amputation. To reduce disparities in amputation, multilevel interventions to facilitate equitable chronic limb-threatening ischemia care are needed.

Attitudes Toward Implicit Bias Among Athletic Trainers

Implicit biases are attitudes, emotions, or stereotypes that occur in an unconscious manner and have the potential to negatively affect behaviors, actions, and decisions. Recent studies have suggested that even when certain factors are controlled for, health care workers do not provide equitable care to patients from different demographics. When patients are not receiving equitable health care, there is a potential for disparities in patient-related outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine attitudes toward implicit bias among athletic trainers. A secondary purpose of this study was to assess differences and correlations between attitudes toward implicit bias and demographic factors including age, years of experience, gender identity, sexual orientation, and race. Participants were recruited for this study by emailing athletic trainers from publicly available staff directories at institutions of higher education and high schools, and athletic training education program directors. The survey consisted of questions gathering demographic information and questions taken from the Attitudes Toward Implicit Bias Instrument. A total of 218 athletic trainers (age = 38 [11] y, years of certified experience = 14 [11] y) opened and completed the survey. On average, participants scored 71.0 [11.2] on the Attitudes Toward Implicit Bias Instrument. This mean score indicated that the average participant felt that implicit bias had the potential to negatively impact patient care and needed to be addressed through education. There was a significant, negligible negative correlation between age and attitudes toward implicit bias (r[216] = -.157, P = .02). Examining implicit bias among athletic trainers warrants further research to understand how implicit bias can negatively affect access to equitable health care opportunities. The development of high-quality interventions for identifying and addressing implicit bias is crucial to ensuring optimal patient outcomes in athletic training and all medical settings.

Perceptions, Attitudes, and Experiences Regarding Mental Health Care Among Young Black Men

Mental health service research has insufficiently examined young Black men's (YBM; ages 18-25) mental health care consumption patterns, obscuring their unmet mental health needs. Concurrently, the literature indicates YBM face unmet service needs that impede their ability to address numerous negative social determinants of health (e.g., high adverse childhood experiences, low socioeconomic status, etc.). Because preventing or treating mental health issues at or near onset can dramatically improve outcomes, this study utilizes thematic analysis to elucidate the factors most consequential to YBM's experiences as mental health service consumers. Eight YBM (Mage = 21.1 years) were purposively recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews to discuss attitudes regarding mental health care and cultural attitudes, gender-based attitudes, structural racism, and transition to adulthood. Of the eight participants, five had active health insurance, six had received mental health services before age 18 years, and three were currently receiving mental health services. Participants were attuned to their mental health needs and rejected stigmatizing attitudes about mental illness. Most participants reported hesitation about taking psychiatric medications. Participants had limited resources and encountered structural barriers to accessing mental health services. Most participants did not perceive racism as a source of mental distress. Culturally informed, consumer-oriented research is critical to tailoring and strengthening YBM's mental health care. Future research should employ a population health approach to promote YBM's mental health service uptake in adulthood.

COVID for One: Identifying Obstacles to Self-Management of COVID-19 for Single Adults

Given the complexities of healthcare provision, it is imperative to understand how single adults experience their interactions with medical professionals and health care organizations, manage care and treatment, and navigate the barriers encountered. This study's purpose is to understand physical and mental health experiences in consideration of social determinants of health, barriers, and coping strategies for single adults diagnosed with COVID-19. An interpretive phenomenology study design was used with 12 individuals who were single and living alone during the COVID-19 pandemic. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews revealed important aspects of the COVID-19 illness experience. Interviews were transcribed for coding and thematic analysis. Analysis of patient interview data identified 4 themes: Dealing with Isolation, Dying Alone, Managing Stigma, and Making a Support Plan. The findings offer insight into what it means to have COVID-19 for single adults who live alone. These findings can be used to help improve the illness experiences of those with COVID-19 and other serious or complex conditions.

Artificial intelligence-generated feedback on social signals in patient-provider communication: technical performance, feedback usability, and impact

Objectives

Implicit bias perpetuates health care inequities and manifests in patient-provider interactions, particularly nonverbal social cues like dominance. We investigated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for automated communication assessment and feedback during primary care visits to raise clinician awareness of bias in patient interactions.

Materials and Methods

(1) Assessed the technical performance of our AI models by building a machine-learning pipeline that automatically detects social signals in patient-provider interactions from 145 primary care visits. (2) Engaged 24 clinicians to design usable AI-generated communication feedback for their workflow. (3) Evaluated the impact of our AI-based approach in a prospective cohort of 108 primary care visits.

Results

Findings demonstrate the feasibility of AI models to identify social signals, such as dominance, warmth, engagement, and interactivity, in nonverbal patient-provider communication. Although engaged clinicians preferred feedback delivered in personalized dashboards, they found nonverbal cues difficult to interpret, motivating social signals as an alternative feedback mechanism. Impact evaluation demonstrated fairness in all AI models with better generalizability of provider dominance, provider engagement, and patient warmth. Stronger clinician implicit race bias was associated with less provider dominance and warmth. Although clinicians expressed overall interest in our AI approach, they recommended improvements to enhance acceptability, feasibility, and implementation in telehealth and medical education contexts.

Discussion and Conclusion

Findings demonstrate promise for AI-driven communication assessment and feedback systems focused on social signals. Future work should improve the performance of this approach, personalize models, and contextualize feedback, and investigate system implementation in educational workflows. This work exemplifies a systematic, multistage approach for evaluating AI tools designed to raise clinician awareness of implicit bias and promote patient-centered, equitable health care interactions.

How do medical students deal with the topic of racism? A qualitative analysis of group discussions in Germany

BACKGROUND

Anti-racism is part of the medical professional ethos. Nevertheless, racism pervades medicine on individual, institutional, and structural levels. The concept of habitus helps to understand deficiencies in enacting anti-racism in practice. We use a habitus-based framework to analyse how medical students in Germany deal with the topic of racism. The research questions are: What are medical students' understandings of racism? How do they deal with the topic in discussions? What difficulties do they face in such discussions?

METHODS

In a qualitative-explorative research design, we conducted six online group discussions with 32 medical students from medical schools all over Germany. Data analysis combined qualitative methods from thematic qualitative content analysis and the documentary method.

RESULTS

We identified five typical ways of dealing with the topic of racism in discussions. The first one ('scientistic') orientates action towards the idea of medicine as an objective science, justifies the use of racial categories as scientific, and defines racism based on intention. The second ('pragmatic') orientates action towards tacit rules of clinical practice, justifies the use of racialised categories as practical and defines racism as an interpersonal problem. The third ('subjectivist') lacks a clear orientation of action for dealing with the topic of racism and instead displays uncertainty and subjectivism in understanding racialised categorisations as well as racism. The fourth ('interculturalist') orientates action towards an ideal of intercultural exchange, understands racialised categorisations as representing cultural differences and interprets racism as prejudice against cultures. The fifth ('critical') orientates action towards sociological scholarship, understands racialised categorisations as social constructs and views racism as a structural problem.

CONCLUSION

The results presented help to understand preconditions of enacting anti-racism in medicine and point to difficulties and learning needs. The heterogenous ways of dealing with the topic require a differentiated approach in medical education.

Pilot training for clinical research professionals in using empathy to recognize and respond to implicit bias in research recruitment and retention

Recruiting and retaining research participants is challenging because it often requires overcoming structural barriers and addressing how histories of mistrust and individuals' lived experiences affect their research engagement. We describe a pilot workshop designed to educate clinical research professionals on using empathy skills to recognize and mitigate bias to improve recruitment and retention. In a post-workshop survey (22/31 participants completed), 94% agreed the workshop helped them practice perspective-taking, recognize implicit bias, and identify opportunities for empathy. Participants reported increased confidence in key recruitment and retention skills (p < 0.05). Future studies will evaluate whether this translates into improved recruitment.

Assessing Bias Toward a Black or White Simulated Patient with Obesity in a Virtual Reality-Based Genomics Encounter

Interpersonal bias based on weight and race is widespread in the clinical setting; it is crucial to investigate how emerging genomics technologies will interact with and influence such biases in the future. The current study uses a virtual reality (VR) simulation to investigate the influence of apparent patient race and provision of genomic information on medical students' implicit and explicit bias toward a virtual patient with obesity. Eighty-four third- and fourth-year medical students (64% female, 42% White) were randomized to interact with a simulated virtual patient who appeared as Black versus White, and to receive genomic risk information for the patient versus a control report. We assessed biased behavior during the simulated encounter and self-reported attitudes toward the virtual patient. Medical student participants tended to express more negative attitudes toward the White virtual patient than the Black virtual patient (both of whom had obesity) when genomic information was absent from the encounter. When genomic risk information was provided, this more often mitigated bias for the White virtual patient, whereas negative attitudes and bias against the Black virtual patient either remained consistent or increased. These patterns underscore the complexity of intersectional identities in clinical settings. Provision of genomic risk information was enough of a contextual shift to alter attitudes and behavior. This research leverages VR simulation to provide an early look at how emerging genomic technologies may differentially influence bias and stereotyping in clinical encounters.

County-level racial bias is associated with worse care for white and especially black older US adults: a cross-sectional observational study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of county-level bias about black and white people with patient experience, influenza immunisation, and quality of clinical care for black and white older US adults (age 65+ years).

DESIGN

Linear multivariable regression measured the cross-sectional association of county-level estimates of implicit and explicit bias about black and white people with patient experiences, influenza immunisation, and clinical quality-of-care for black and white older US adults.

PARTICIPANTS

We used data from 1.9 million white adults who completed implicit and explicit bias measures during 2003-2018, patient experience and influenza immunisation data from respondents to the 2009-2017 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (MCAHPS) Surveys, and clinical quality-of-care data from patients whose records were included in 2009-2017 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) submissions (n=0.8-2.9 million per measure).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Three patient experience measures and patient-reported influenza immunisation from the MCAHPS Survey; five HEDIS measures.

RESULTS

In county-level models, higher pro-white implicit bias was associated with lower immunisation rates and worse scores for some patient experience measures for black and white adults as well as larger-magnitude black-white disparities. Higher pro-white implicit bias was associated with worse scores for some HEDIS measures for black and white adults but not with black-white disparities in clinical quality of care. Most significant associations were small in magnitude (effect sizes of 0.2-0.3 or less).

CONCLUSIONS

To the extent that county-level pro-white implicit bias is indicative of bias among healthcare providers, there may be a need for interventions designed to prevent such bias from adversely affecting the experiences and preventive care of black patients and the clinical quality of care for all patients.

The Consequences of Misdiagnosing Race-Based Trauma Response in Black Men: A Critical Examination

Mental illness is a significant public health concern prevalent in America. Over one in five U.S. adults are affected, yet less than half receive treatment. Among African Americans, only one in three seek treatment with statically lower rates among Black males. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate treatment, while misdiagnosis leads to stigma, discrimination, and untreated illness. This paper examines the implications of misdiagnosing trauma responses in Black men, highlighting systemic biases that impede suitable care and perpetuate negative narratives. The authors propose a conceptual framework incorporating historical trauma, discrimination, and traumatic stress reactions, emphasizing the need for cultural competence and humility. This framework involves public narratives that influence perceptions and judgments, reviewing research evidence, advocating for competent trauma assessments, community empowerment, and future research directions. This paper underscores the importance of understanding and addressing the unique challenges Black men face in mental health diagnosis and treatment.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health Care Experiences for Veterans Receiving VA Community Care from 2016 to 2021

BACKGROUND

Prior research documented racial and ethnic disparities in health care experiences within the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Little is known about such differences in VA-funded community care programs, through which a growing number of Veterans receive health care. Community care is available to Veterans when care is not available through the VA, nearby, or in a timely manner.

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in Veterans' experiences with VA-funded community care by race and ethnicity and assess changes in these experiences from 2016 to 2021.

DESIGN

Observational analyses of Veterans' ratings of community care experiences by self-reported race and ethnicity. We used linear and logistic regressions to estimate racial and ethnic differences in community care experiences, sequentially adjusting for demographic, health, insurance, and socioeconomic factors.

PARTICIPANTS

Respondents to the 2016-2021 VA Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-Community Care Survey.

MEASURES

Care ratings in nine domains.

KEY RESULTS

The sample of 231,869 respondents included 24,306 Black Veterans (mean [SD] age 56.5 [12.9] years, 77.5% male) and 16,490 Hispanic Veterans (mean [SD] age 54.6 [15.9] years, 85.3% male). In adjusted analyses pooled across study years, Black and Hispanic Veterans reported significantly lower ratings than their White and non-Hispanic counterparts in five of nine domains (overall rating of community providers, scheduling a recent appointment, provider communication, non-appointment access, and billing), with adjusted differences ranging from - 0.04 to - 0.13 standard deviations (SDs) of domain scores. Black and Hispanic Veterans reported higher ratings with eligibility determination and scheduling initial appointments than their White and non-Hispanic counterparts, and Black Veterans reported higher ratings of care coordination, with adjusted differences of 0.05 to 0.21 SDs. Care ratings improved from 2016 to 2021, but differences between racial and ethnic groups persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified small but persistent racial and ethnic differences in Veterans' experiences with VA-funded community care, with Black and Hispanic Veterans reporting lower ratings in five domains and, respectively, higher ratings in three and two domains. Interventions to improve Black and Hispanic Veterans' patient experience could advance equity in VA community care.

The nature and validity of implicit bias training for health care providers and trainees: A systematic review

The number of health care educational institutions/organizations adopting implicit bias training is growing. Our systematic review of 77 studies (published 1 January 2003 through 21 September 2022) investigated how implicit bias training in health care is designed/delivered and whether gaps in knowledge translation compromised the reliability and validity of the training. The primary training target was race/ethnicity (49.3%); trainings commonly lack specificity on addressing implicit prejudice or stereotyping (67.5%). They involved a combination of hands-on and didactic approaches, lasting an average of 343.15 min, often delivered in a single day (53.2%). Trainings also exhibit translational gaps, diverging from current literature (10 to 67.5%), and lack internal (99.9%), face (93.5%), and external (100%) validity. Implicit bias trainings in health care are characterized by bias in methodological quality and translational gaps, potentially compromising their impacts.

Promoting Safe and Supportive Health Care Spaces for Youth Experiencing Racism

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study applies a community-based participatory research approach to elicit formative data on pediatric patient experiences of racism in the health care setting and to explore clinic-based opportunities for supporting pediatric patients experiencing racism.

METHODS

The study is situated within the outpatient practice of a large tertiary academic medical center in a midsize Midwestern city. Community partners were involved in all aspects of the research, including research protocol design, recruitment, data analysis, community dissemination, and manuscript preparation. Participants were youth between 11 and 18 years, in middle or high school, self-identifying as a person of color, Latinx or Indigenous who answered yes to the question "have you ever experienced race-related prejudice and discrimination?" Parent/guardians of youth meeting inclusion criteria participated in separate focus groups. Data were analyzed using an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach.

RESULTS

Major findings were divided into 2 categories: 1) racism-related experiences in the health care setting; and 2) patient and parent/guardian recommendations to support pediatric patients experiencing racism. Among health care setting experiences, primary emerging themes included racism experienced in the health care setting, patient-clinician communication around racism, patient-clinician concordance, and high-quality clinical care. Recommendations were presented within the 4 domains of racism: intrapersonal, interpersonal, structural, and institutional.

CONCLUSIONS

Racism experiences worsen child biological, psychological, and behavioral functioning, yet research is lacking on how health care professionals may best support pediatric patients experiencing racism. Study findings suggest opportunities for providing safer and more supportive health care spaces for youth experiencing racism.

Harm Reduction and Treatment Among People at High Risk of Overdose

Importance

Rates of overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids remain high, increasingly involve stimulants combined with opioids, and are increasing rapidly in racially and ethnically minoritized communities, yet little is known about access to harm reduction and treatment services in these groups.

Objective

To characterize access and barriers to harm reduction and treatment in a racially and ethnically diverse population of people who use drugs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A cross-sectional telephone survey of people recruited from 39 treatment, harm reduction, and social service organizations in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin; Flint and Detroit, Michigan; and statewide in New Jersey was conducted from January 30 to July 28, 2023. Adults who used cocaine, methamphetamine, or opioids in the past 30 days called a study hotline and completed an interview in English or Spanish.

Exposures

Overdose experience, drug types used (opioids only, stimulants only, and polysubstance), and social risk factors (eg, financial instability and criminal legal involvement).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Recent use of any harm reduction services, fentanyl test strips, naloxone possession, treatment, and self-reported barriers to services.

Results

Of the total sample of 1240 adults, 486 (39.2%) were Black non-Hispanic, 183 (14.8%) were Hispanic, and 464 (37.4%) were White non-Hispanic. In the past 30 days, 826 individuals (66.6%) were polysubstance users, 135 (10.9%) used only opioids, and 279 (22.5%) used only stimulants. A total of 349 respondents (28.1%) experienced a prior-year overdose. Compared with those without a prior-year overdose, people with overdose were more likely to possess naloxone (80.7% vs 68.2%; P < .001), possess fentanyl test strips (36.8% vs 23.5%; P < .001), and use harm reduction services (63.4% vs 53.0%; P = .003), while differences in treatment use were nonsignificant (52.0% vs 46.6%; P = .24). Among stimulant-only users, 51.4% possessed naloxone compared with 77.3% of opioid-only users (P < .001) and 77.6% of polysubstance users (P < .001), with similar disparities in fentanyl test strip possession.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study of people who used drugs in the past 30 days, findings highlighted low use of harm reduction and treatment services among people who use stimulants. Additional communication regarding their importance may help increase the use of the services amidst a rapidly changing drug supply.

Racial Differences in Stigmatizing and Positive Language in Emergency Medicine Notes

OBJECTIVE

Language used by providers in medical documentation may reveal evidence of race-related implicit bias. We aimed to use natural language processing (NLP) to examine if prevalence of stigmatizing language in emergency medicine (EM) encounter notes differs across patient race/ethnicity.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort of EM encounters, NLP techniques identified stigmatizing and positive themes. Logistic regression models analyzed the association of race/ethnicity and themes within notes. Outcomes were the presence (or absence) of 7 different themes: 5 stigmatizing (difficult, non-compliant, skepticism, substance abuse/seeking, and financial difficulty) and 2 positive (compliment and compliant).

RESULTS

The sample included notes from 26,363 unique patients. NH Black patient notes were less likely to contain difficult (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.88), skepticism (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.79-0.96), and substance abuse/seeking (OR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.56-0.70) compared to NH White patient notes but more likely to contain non-compliant (OR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.17-1.36) and financial difficulty (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 1.04-1.25). Hispanic patient notes were less likely to contain difficult (OR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.58-0.80) and substance abuse/seeking (OR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.66-0.93). NH NA/AI patient notes had twice the odds as NH White patient notes to contain a stigmatizing theme (OR 2.02, 95% CI, 1.64-2.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Using an NLP model to analyze themes in EM notes across racial groups, we identified several inequities in the usage of positive and stigmatizing language. Interventions to minimize race-related implicit bias should be undertaken.

A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic surgery continues to be one of the least diverse medical specialties. Recently, increasing emphasis has been placed on improving diversity in the medical field, which includes the need to better understand existing biases. Despite this, only about 6% of orthopaedic surgeons are women and 0.3% are Black. Addressing diversity, in part, requires a better understanding of existing biases. Most universities and residency programs have statements and policies against discrimination that seek to eliminate explicit biases. However, unconscious biases might negatively impact the selection, training, and career advancement of women and minorities who are underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery. Although this is difficult to measure, the Implicit Association Test (IAT) by Project Implicit might be useful to identify and measure levels of unconscious bias among orthopaedic surgeons, providing opportunities for additional interventions to improve diversity in this field.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do orthopaedic surgeons demonstrate implicit biases related to race and gender roles? (2) Are certain demographic characteristics (age, gender, race or ethnicity, or geographic location) or program characteristics (geographic location or size of program) associated with the presence of implicit biases? (3) Do the implicit biases of orthopaedic surgeons differ from those of other healthcare providers or the general population?

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of implicit bias among orthopaedic surgeons was performed using the IAT from Project Implicit. The IAT is a computerized test that measures the time required to associate words or pictures with attributes, with faster or slower response times suggesting the ease or difficulty of associating the items. Although concerns have been raised recently about the validity and utility of the IAT, we believed it was the right study instrument to help identify the slight hesitation that can imply differences between inclusion and exclusion of a person. We used two IATs, one for Black and White race and one for gender, career, and family roles. We invited a consortium of researchers from United States and Canadian orthopaedic residency programs. Researchers at 34 programs agreed to distribute the invitation via email to their faculty, residents, and fellows for a total of 1484 invitees. Twenty-eight percent (419) of orthopaedic surgeons and trainees completed the survey. The respondents were 45% (186) residents, 55% (228) faculty, and one fellow. To evaluate response biases, the respondent population was compared with that of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons census. Responses were reported as D-scores based on response times for associations. D-scores were categorized as showing strong (≥ 0.65), moderate (≥ 0.35 to < 0.65), or slight (≥ 0.15 to < 0.35) associations. For a frame of reference, orthopaedic surgeons' mean IAT scores were compared with historical scores of other self-identified healthcare providers and that of the general population. Mean D-scores were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test to determine whether demographic characteristics were associated with differences in D-scores. Bonferroni correction was applied, and p values less than 0.0056 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean IAT D-scores of orthopaedic surgeons indicated a slight preference for White people (0.29 ± 0.4) and a slight association of men with career (0.24 ± 0.3), with a normal distribution. Hence, most respondents' scores indicated slight preferences, but strong preferences for White race were noted in 27% (112 of 419) of respondents. There was a strong association of women with family and home and an association of men with work or career in 14% (60 of 419). These preferences generally did not correlate with the demographic, geographic, and program variables that were analyzed, except for a stronger association of women with family and home among women respondents. There were no differences in race IAT D-scores between orthopaedic surgeons and other healthcare providers and the general population. Gender-career IAT D-scores associating women with family and home were slightly lower among orthopaedic surgeons (0.24 ± 0.3) than among the general population (0.32 ± 0.4; p < 0.001) and other healthcare professionals (0.34 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). All of these values are in the slight preference range.

CONCLUSION

Orthopaedic surgeons demonstrated slight preferences for White people, and there was a tendency to associate women with career and family on IATs, regardless of demographic and program characteristics, similar to others in healthcare and the general population. Given the similarity of scores with those in other, more diverse areas of medicine, unconscious biases alone do not explain the relative lack of diversity in orthopaedic surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Implicit biases only explain a small portion of the lack of progress in improving diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in our workforce and resolving healthcare disparities. Other causes including explicit biases, an unwelcoming culture, and perceptions of our specialty should be examined. Remedies including engagement of students and mentorship throughout training and early career should be sought.

Study protocol for transforming health equity research in integrated primary care: Antiracism as a disruptive innovation

Among the consequences of systemic racism in health care are significant health disparities among Black/African American individuals with comorbid physical and mental health conditions. Despite decades of studies acknowledging health disparities based on race, significant change has not occurred. There are shockingly few evidence-based antiracism interventions. New paradigms are needed to intervene on, and not just document, racism in health care systems. We are developing a transformative paradigm for new antiracism interventions for primary care settings that integrate mental and physical health care. The paradigm is the first of its kind to integrate community-based participatory research and systems science, within an established model of early phase translation to rigorously define new antiracism interventions. This protocol will use a novel application of systems sciences by combining the qualitative systems sciences methods (group model building; GMB) with quantitative methods (simulation modeling) to develop a comprehensive and community-engaged view of both the drivers of racism and the potential impact of antiracism interventions. Community participants from two integrated primary health care systems will engage in group GMB workshops with researchers to 1) Describe and map the complex dynamic systems driving racism in health care practices, 2) Identify leverage points for disruptive antiracism interventions, policies and practices, and 3) Review and prioritize a list of possible intervention strategies. Advisory committees will provide feedback on the design of GMB procedures, screen potential intervention components for impact, feasibility, and acceptability, and identify gaps for further exploration. Simulation models will be generated based on contextual factors and provider/patient characteristics. Using Item Response Theory, we will initiate the process of developing core measures for assessing the effectiveness of interventions at the organizational-systems and provider levels to be tested under a variety of conditions. While we focus on Black/African Americans, we hope that the resulting transformative paradigm can be applied to improve health equity among other marginalized groups.

Design and pilot test of an implicit bias mitigation curriculum for clinicians

Introduction

Clinician implicit racial bias (IB) may lead to lower quality care and adverse health outcomes for Black patients. Educational efforts to train clinicians to mitigate IB vary widely and have insufficient evidence of impact. We developed and pilot-tested an evidence-based clinician IB curriculum, "REACHing Equity."

Methods

To assess acceptability and feasibility, we conducted an uncontrolled one-arm pilot trial with post-intervention assessments. REACHing Equity is designed for clinicians to: (1) acquire knowledge about IB and its impact on healthcare, (2) increase awareness of one's own capacity for IB, and (3) develop skills to mitigate IB in the clinical encounter. We delivered REACHing Equity virtually in three facilitated, interactive sessions over 7-9 weeks. Participants were health care providers who completed baseline and end-of-study evaluation surveys.

Results

Of approximately 1,592 clinicians invited, 37 participated, of whom 29 self-identified as women and 24 as non-Hispanic White. Attendance averaged 90% per session; 78% attended all 3 sessions. Response rate for evaluation surveys was 67%. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum objectives were met, and that REACHing Equity equipped them to mitigate the impact of implicit bias in clinical care. Participants consistently reported higher self-efficacy for mitigating IB after compared to before completing the curriculum.

Conclusions

Despite apparent barriers to clinician participation, we demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of the REACHing Equity intervention. Further research is needed to develop objective measures of uptake and clinician skill, test the impact of REACHing Equity on clinically relevant outcomes, and refine the curriculum for uptake and dissemination.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03415308.

Racial Disparities in Early-Stage NSCLC Treatment: A Call for Action

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with a 5-year survival rate of only 28%; however, when caught at an early stage, it can be cured with surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Unfortunately, racial disparities may result in limited access to care for some patients. Liu and colleagues analyzed 64,999 cases of early-stage NSCLC treated between 2005 and 2017 from the Florida Cancer Registry and showed that Black patients had 36% lower odds of receiving curative-intent surgery compared with their White counterparts. This study highlights significant racial disparities in treatment patterns that must be addressed urgently. See related article by Liu and colleagues, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33:489-99.

An exploration of cultural competency training and genetic counselors' racial biases

Research shows genetic counselors generally have pro-White implicit biases-both prejudice and stereotyping. Cultural competency training aims to foster equitable beliefs, behaviors, and attitudes in cross-cultural genetic counseling sessions, including those that are racially discordant (genetic counselors and patients are from different racial backgrounds). Therefore, cultural competency training has the potential to mitigate bias and reduce disparities. Here, we report the prevalence of cultural competency training among genetic counselors and associations between recency of training and counselors' racial biases. We conducted an online survey of genetic counselors and trainees in fall 2021. The survey assessed four types of bias (implicit/explicit prejudice and implicit/explicit stereotyping), time since last cultural competency training, time since last communication skills training, and frequency of clinic sessions with Black patients. Multiple linear regressions modeled associations between cultural competency training and different types of bias, adjusting for communication skills training, frequency of encounters with Black patients, and counselor race (White vs. non-White). Two hundred fifteen participants (107 genetic counselors and 108 trainees) responded, and 205 reported whether they had prior cultural competency training. Of these, 187 (91%) reported ever having cultural competency training, most (53%) of participants who had training had it within 6 months prior to survey completion. We found no clear pattern of associations between cultural competency training and racial biases (implicit or explicit) in adjusted analyses. Participants who had cultural competency training four or more years prior demonstrated less negative implicit stereotyping toward Black individuals compared with those having more recent training; but no statistically significant effect was found for participants who reported never having cultural competency training, compared with those having training more recently than 4 years prior. Overall, our findings do not support that cultural competency training is negatively associated with, or mitigates, Black/White racial prejudices and stereotypes against Black patients. These findings suggest more effective interventions are needed to reduce racial biases.

Experiences and Challenges of African American and Sub-Saharan African Immigrant Black Women in Completing Pap Screening: a Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Understanding Black women's Papanicolaou (Pap) screening experiences can inform efforts to reduce cancer disparities. This study examined experiences among both US-born US Black women and Sub-Saharan African immigrant women.

METHOD

Using a convergent parallel mixed methods design, Black women born in the USA and in Sub-Saharan Africa age 21-65 years were recruited to participate in focus groups and complete a 25-item survey about patient-centered communication and perceived racial discrimination. Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated to provide a fuller understanding of results.

RESULTS

Of the 37 participants, 14 were US-born and 23 were Sub-Saharan African-born Black women. The mean age was 40.0 ± 11.0, and 83.8% had received at least one Pap test. Five themes regarding factors that impact screening uptake emerged from the focus groups: (1) positive and negative experiences with providers; (2) provider communication and interaction; (3) individual barriers to screening uptake, (4) implicit bias, discrimination, and stereotypical views among providers, and (5) language barrier. Survey and focus group findings diverged on several points. While focus group themes captured both positive and negative experiences with provider communication, survey results indicated that most of both US-born and Sub-Saharan African-born women experienced positive patient-centered communication with health care providers. Additionally, during focus group sessions many participants described experiences of discrimination in health care settings, but less than a third reported this in the survey.

CONCLUSION

Black women's health care experiences affect Pap screening uptake. Poor communication and perceived discrimination during health care encounters highlight areas for needed service improvement to reduce cervical cancer disparities.

Medication Adherence-From Measurer to Measured

This essay by a researcher who developed a widely used medication adherence measure explores his experience with being labeled “nonadherent.”

Race and Ethnicity Are Related to Undesirable Home Health Care Outcomes in Seriously Ill Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

Medicare Home Health Care (HHC) services are integral to the care of homebound seriously ill older adults requiring ongoing specialized medical care. Although disparities in health outcomes are well documented in inpatient and primary care, disparities experienced by historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in HHC are understudied. This study aimed to examine the relationship between individual characteristics and differences in HHC health outcomes for seriously ill older adults.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis, repeated measure.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Seriously ill older adults who received HHC in 2016 in the HHC Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS).

METHODS

Start of care and discharge data from the 2016 HCC OASIS were used to examine the relationship between individual characteristics and differences in HHC health outcomes identified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as key indicators of quality in HHC, including dyspnea, pain frequency, cognitive functioning, and presence of unhealed pressure ulcer stage II or higher. A generalized ordered logit model with partial proportional odds was used for the ordinal categorical outcomes and a logistic regression was used for the binary dependent variable.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that of 227,402 seriously ill individuals with an HHC episode in 2016, those from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups had between 14% and 57% higher odds of worse health outcomes compared with non-Hispanic white patients with the exception of pain frequency.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

For people living with serious illness, there are significant differences in Medicare HHC health outcomes when comparing underrepresented racial or ethnic beneficiaries with white counterparts. More research is needed to understand how health care processes such as referral patterns or time to care initiation, and structural factors such as HHC agency quality and neighborhood social deprivation are related to health differences observed in the population.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardiac Reintervention After Pediatric Cardiac Surgical Procedures

BACKGROUND

Children undergoing cardiac surgical procedures may require postoperative surgical or catheter-based reintervention before discharge. We examined racial/ethnic variations in reintervention and associated in-hospital death.

METHODS

Children undergoing cardiac surgical procedures from 2004 to 2015 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database. Regression analysis measured associations between race/ethnicity, in-hospital death, and postoperative cardiac surgical or catheter-based reintervention (surgical/catheter reintervention).

RESULTS

Of 124,263 patients, 8265 (6.7%) had a surgical/catheter reintervention. Black patients had fewer reinterventions (5.9% vs 6.7%) and higher in-hospital mortality (3.9% vs 2.7%, P < .01) than White patients. After adjusting for sociodemographic and illness severity indicators, Black patients remained less likely to receive surgical/catheter reintervention (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98) despite having similar risk of death after reintervention (adjusted odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98-1.41) compared with White patients. The risk of death without surgical/catheter reintervention was also higher for Black (aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47) and other race/ethnicity (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57) patients than for White patients. Similar trends were demonstrated when mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplantation were included as reinterventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients of Black and other race/ethnicity undergoing pediatric cardiac surgical procedures are more likely to die without postoperative cardiac reintervention than White patients. Black patients are also less likely to receive reintervention despite no significant difference in mortality with reintervention. Further studies should evaluate etiologies and methods of addressing these disparities.

Racial Implicit Associations in Child Psychiatry

OBJECTIVE

Racial disparities in diagnosis and treatment are prevalent in child psychiatry, including disparate diagnosis rates of internalizing and externalizing disorders in Black and White children. However, limited research has investigated mechanisms that contribute to these disparities. This study examined child racial implicit associations in psychiatric clinicians and medical students to address this gap.

METHOD

Psychiatrists and trainees completed an online survey including 2 race Implicit Association Tests (IATs) pairing child faces to words with either positive or negative valence, and words related to internalizing or externalizing behavioral problems. Psychiatrists and trainees' demographic predictors of implicit associations were also investigated.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 235 psychiatrists and trainees (112 child and adolescent psychiatrists and fellows) who met inclusion criteria. Psychiatrists and trainees demonstrated greater moderate-to-strong association between Black child faces and "bad" (ie, negatively valenced) words (44.3%) vs "good" (ie, positively valenced) words (6.4%), and between externalizing words (41.7%) vs internalizing words (7.2%). Psychiatrists and trainees' demographic characteristics including being female (β = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.23 to -0.01; p < .05), Black (β = -0.36; 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.18; p < .001), or an attending physician (β = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.06; p = .01) were significant predictors of decreased association between Black child faces and negative valence words. Being female was a significant predictor of decreased association between Black child faces and externalizing words (β = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.06; p = .01).

CONCLUSION

Participating psychiatrists and trainees demonstrated bias toward associating Black rather than White child faces with negative words and externalizing behavioral problems. Future research should examine the following: racial implicit associations in a more generalizable sample; the relationship between race IATs and provider behavior; and interventions to reduce racial inequities in psychiatry, including individual and systemic solutions.

DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT

We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper received support from a program designed to increase minority representation in science.

Intercultural effectiveness in GPs' communication and clinical assessment: An experimental study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate potential disparities in general practitioners' overall communication and clinical assessments based on patient ethnicity, while examining the influence of intercultural effectiveness.

METHODS

Employing a 2 × 2 experimental study design, online video recorded consultations with simulated patients were conducted and analyzed using OSCEs. Each GP (N = 100) completed a consultation with both an ethnic majority and an ethnic minority patient. Additionally, a follow-up survey was administered to gather supplementary data. Paired sample t-tests explored ethnic disparities, correlation and regression analyses determined associations with intercultural attitudes, traits and capabilities.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in GPs' communication or clinical assessment were found based on patients' ethnic background. Positive associations were observed between all aspects of intercultural effectiveness and GPs' consultation behavior. Intercultural traits emerged as a strong and robust predictor of clinical assessment of ethnic minority patients.

CONCLUSION

Intercultural traits, such as ethnocultural empathy, may play a critical role in GPs' clinical assessment skills during intercultural consultations.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Findings provide valuable insights into the determinants of intercultural effectiveness in healthcare, fostering promising targets for interventions and training programs aiming to ensure higher-quality and more equitable care delivery.