1
|
Rendall MS, Eeckhaut MCW, Gifford K, Hurtado-Acuna C. Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) and Early Childbearing Revisited: Births and Birth Intendedness After LARC Removal in a State Medicaid Population (2012-2020). Am J Public Health 2024:e1-e8. [PMID: 39388674 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2024.307844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
Abstract
Objectives. To analyze births and birth intendedness after long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal among Medicaid-insured women. Methods. We linked all Delaware women with a Medicaid-covered LARC removal in 2012 to 2020 (n = 8047) to birth records and to Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) pregnancy intendedness survey responses (n = 241). Results. Births within 3 years of a Medicaid-covered LARC removal were much more likely to be to women in their 20s compared with all Medicaid births (63.5% vs 53.4%; P < .001). The intended proportion for births within 3 years of Medicaid-covered LARC removal (65.2%) was higher than for all Medicaid-covered births (58.8%; P = .08) and was consistently above 60% across all age groups younger than 30 years. Conclusions. A state Medicaid-insured population's use of highly effective reversible contraception was associated with births being concentrated among women in their 20s and with consistently high fractions of intended births across younger ages at birth. Public Health Implications. Programs and policies may consider LARC access for its potential to increase low-income women's reproductive autonomy by enhancing their ability to achieve births at the age of their choosing. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print October 10, 2024:e1-e8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307844).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Rendall
- Michael S. Rendall and Constanza Hurtado-Acuna are with the Department of Sociology and the Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park. Mieke C. W. Eeckhaut is with the Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Newark. Katie Gifford is with the Center for Community Research & Service, University of Delaware, Newark
| | - Mieke C W Eeckhaut
- Michael S. Rendall and Constanza Hurtado-Acuna are with the Department of Sociology and the Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park. Mieke C. W. Eeckhaut is with the Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Newark. Katie Gifford is with the Center for Community Research & Service, University of Delaware, Newark
| | - Katie Gifford
- Michael S. Rendall and Constanza Hurtado-Acuna are with the Department of Sociology and the Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park. Mieke C. W. Eeckhaut is with the Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Newark. Katie Gifford is with the Center for Community Research & Service, University of Delaware, Newark
| | - Constanza Hurtado-Acuna
- Michael S. Rendall and Constanza Hurtado-Acuna are with the Department of Sociology and the Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park. Mieke C. W. Eeckhaut is with the Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Newark. Katie Gifford is with the Center for Community Research & Service, University of Delaware, Newark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodriguez MI, Meath THA, Watson K, Daly A, McConnell KJ, Kim H. Decomposition analysis of racial and ethnic differences in receipt of immediate postpartum, long-acting, reversible, and permanent contraception. Contraception 2024; 138:110512. [PMID: 38852698 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine the factors contributing to racial and ethnic disparities in the use of immediate postpartum, long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC) and permanent contraception among Medicaid recipients. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a cross-sectional study using 3 years of national Medicaid claims data to examine the rates of IPP LARC use alone and a composite measure of postpartum permanent contraception and IPP LARC within 7 days of delivery by race and ethnicity. We used a Blinder-Oaxaca model to quantify the extent to which medical complexity, age, rurality, mode of delivery, and year explained differences in outcomes among different minoritized groups in comparison to non-Hispanic White women. RESULTS Our study sample contained 1,729,663 deliveries occurring from 2016 through 2018 among 1,605,199 people living in 16 states. IPP LARC use rates were highest among Black (2.2%), followed by American Indian and Alaska Native at 2.1% and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander beneficiaries at 1.9%, Hispanic (all races) at 1.2%, and Asian at 1.0%. IPP LARC was lowest among White beneficiaries (0.8%). Medical complexity, age, rurality, year, and mode of delivery explained only 12.3% of the difference in IPP LARC rates between Black and White beneficiaries. Postpartum permanent contraception was highest among White (7.6%), Hispanic (7.2%), and American Indian and Alaska Native (6.8%), followed by Black (6.3%), Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (5.1%) and lowest among Asian women (4.1%). When we examined the use of IPP LARC or postpartum permanent contraception together, these same factors explained 94.4% of the differences between Black and White beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS While differences in the use of IPP LARC by race and ethnicity were identified, our findings suggest that overall use of inpatient highly effective contraception are similar across racial and ethnic groups. IMPLICATIONS When IPP LARC and postpartum permanent contraception are examined jointly, their use is similar across racial and ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria I Rodriguez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Thomas H A Meath
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Kelsey Watson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Ashley Daly
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - K John McConnell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Hyunjee Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gifford K, McColl R, McDuffie MJ, Boudreaux M. Postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive adoption after a statewide initiative. Health Serv Res 2024; 59:e14300. [PMID: 38491794 PMCID: PMC11063091 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the effects of a comprehensive, multiyear (2015-2020) statewide contraceptive access intervention in Delaware on the contraceptive initiation of postpartum Medicaid patients. The program aimed to increase access to all contraceptives, including long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC). The program included interventions specifically targeting postpartum patients (Medicaid payment reform and hospital-based immediate postpartum (IPP) LARC training) and interventions in outpatient settings (provider training and operational supports). DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING We used Medicaid claims data between 2012 and 2019, from Delaware and Maryland (a comparison state), to identify births and postpartum contraceptive methods up to 60 days postpartum among patients aged 15-44 years who were covered in a full-benefit eligibility category. STUDY DESIGN Using difference-in-differences, we assessed changes in LARC, tubal ligation, and short-acting methods (oral contraceptive, injectable, patch/ring). LARC rates were assessed at 60 days after delivery and on an immediate postpartum basis. Other methods were only assessed at 60 days. Analyses were conducted separately for an early-adopting high-capacity hospital (that delivers approximately half of all Medicaid financed births) and for all other later-adopting hospitals in the state. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Data were extracted from administrative claims. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The program increased postpartum LARC insertions by 60 days after delivery by 11.7 percentage points (95% CI: 10.7, 12.8) in the early-adopting hospital and 6.9 percentage points (95% CI: 4.8, 5.9) in later-adopting hospitals. Increases in IPP versus outpatient LARC drove the change, but we did not find evidence that IPP crowded-out outpatient LARC services. We observed decreases in short-acting methods, suggesting substitution between methods, but the share of patients with any method increased at the early-adopting hospital (5.2 percentage points; 95% CI: 3.5, 6.9) and was not statistically significantly different at the later-adopting hospitals. CONCLUSIONS Direct reimbursement for IPP LARC, in combination with provider training, had a meaningful impact on the share of Medicaid-enrolled postpartum women with LARC claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Gifford
- Biden School of Public Policy & AdministrationUniversity of DelawareNewarkDelawareUSA
| | - Rebecca McColl
- Biden School of Public Policy & AdministrationUniversity of DelawareNewarkDelawareUSA
| | - Mary Joan McDuffie
- Biden School of Public Policy & AdministrationUniversity of DelawareNewarkDelawareUSA
| | - Michel Boudreaux
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementUniversity of Maryland School of Public HealthCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fox KR, Kameoka AM, Raidoo S, Soon R, Tschann M, Fontanilla T, Kaneshiro B. Patient Barriers to Discontinuing Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Matern Child Health J 2024; 28:192-197. [PMID: 38158476 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03878-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe how frequently a national sample of patients with experience discontinuing or desiring discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) experienced barriers to discontinuation. METHODS We conducted an online survey of individuals ages 18 to 50 in the United States who had previously used and discontinued or attempted to discontinue LARC. We recruited respondents using the Amazon platform MTurk. Respondents provided demographic information and answered questions regarding their experience discontinuing LARC, including reasons removal was deferred or denied. We analyzed frequency of types of barriers encountered and compared these by demographic factors. RESULTS Of the 376 surveys analyzed, 99 (26%) described experiencing at least one barrier to removal. Barriers were disproportionately reported by those who had public health insurance, a history of abortion, and a history of birth compared to those who did not report barriers to removal. They also more frequently identified as Latinx, Asian, or Middle Eastern. Most barriers were provider-driven and potentially modifiable. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE Barriers to LARC discontinuation are common and may be provider- or systems-driven. Providers should be mindful of biases in their counseling and practices to avoid contributing to these barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kacie R Fox
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1319 Punahou St. #824, Honolulu, HI, 96826, USA
| | - Alyssa M Kameoka
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1319 Punahou St. #824, Honolulu, HI, 96826, USA.
| | - Shandhini Raidoo
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1319 Punahou St. #824, Honolulu, HI, 96826, USA
| | - Reni Soon
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1319 Punahou St. #824, Honolulu, HI, 96826, USA
| | - Mary Tschann
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1319 Punahou St. #824, Honolulu, HI, 96826, USA
| | - Tiana Fontanilla
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1319 Punahou St. #824, Honolulu, HI, 96826, USA
| | - Bliss Kaneshiro
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1319 Punahou St. #824, Honolulu, HI, 96826, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Key K, Wollum A, Asetoyer C, Cervantes M, Lindsey A, Rivera RZ, Flint JR, Zuniga C, Sanchez J, Baum SE. Challenges accessing contraceptive care and interest in over-the-counter oral contraceptive pill use among Black, Indigenous, and people of color: An online cross-sectional survey. Contraception 2023; 120:109950. [PMID: 36641098 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine challenges accessing contraception in the past year and their association with interest in using an over the counter (OTC) oral contraceptive pill (OCP) among Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) in the United States. STUDY DESIGN From May 2021 to March 2022, a collaborative research team conducted a cross-sectional online survey using convenience sampling to recruit people who identify as Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Indigenous, or Latina/Latinx and used or wanted to use a contraceptive method in the past year. Respondents were recruited through reproductive justice and community-based organizations. RESULTS Among 727 respondents, 45% reported experiencing at least one challenge accessing contraception in the past year of which 37% reported a logistical challenge, and 20% reported an interpersonal challenge. Sixty-seven percent of respondents said they were likely to use an OTC OCP. Respondents who reported experiencing at least one challenge accessing contraception in the past year were more likely to say they would use an OTC OCP. Fifty-seven percent of respondents who were not using a contraceptive method in the past year reported they were likely to use an OTC OCP. CONCLUSION Among people in this study, interest in an OTC OCP is high, particularly among those who have faced challenges accessing contraception, and among those who are not currently using a contraceptive method. IMPLICATIONS Availability of an OCP OTC has the potential to address challenges accessing contraceptive care among BIPOC in the United States, who are often impacted by structural inequities and racism. Findings from this study can inform future OTC implementation strategies to ensure OTC access addresses logistical and interpersonal challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Key
- Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA & Oakland, CA, United States.
| | - Alexandra Wollum
- Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA & Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Charon Asetoyer
- Native American Community Board, Lake Andes, SD, United States
| | - Maricela Cervantes
- California Latinas for Reproductive Justice, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Alyssa Lindsey
- National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | | | - Carmela Zuniga
- Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA & Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Jessica Sanchez
- Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA & Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Sarah E Baum
- Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA & Oakland, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McColl R, Gifford K, McDuffie MJ, Boudreaux M. Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive utilization after a statewide contraceptive access initiative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228:451.e1-451.e8. [PMID: 36565901 PMCID: PMC10065916 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day placement of long-acting reversible contraceptives, occurring when the device is requested and placed within a single visit, reduces barriers to the patient and reduces unintended pregnancies. Despite the safety and efficacy of same-day placement, access to same-day services remains low. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the Delaware Contraceptive Access Now initiative, a statewide initiative in Delaware focused on increasing same-day access to effective contraception on same-day receipt of long-acting reversible contraceptives. STUDY DESIGN We used Medicaid claims and encounter data to identify instances of same-day and multivisit receipts of long-acting reversible contraceptives among Medicaid-enrolled individuals in Delaware and Maryland aged 15-44 years who were covered in a full-benefits or family planning Medicaid aid category during the month of the placement and the 2 previous months. We used a difference-in-differences design that compared changes in the outcome from before to after implementation of the initiative among placements at agencies that participated in the initiative (n=6676) vs 2 alternative comparison groups: placements at Delaware agencies that did not participate (n=688) and placements in Maryland (n=35,847). RESULTS We found that the intervention was associated with a 13.3 percentage point increase (95% confidence interval, 1.9%-24.7%) in receipt of same-day long-acting reversible contraceptives using a nonparticipating Delaware comparison group, a 21.1 percentage point increase (95% confidence interval, 13.7%-28.6%) using a Maryland comparison group, and a 21.0 percentage point increase (95% confidence interval, 14.1%-27.9%) using a pooled comparison group. The effects were larger for implants than intrauterine devices. CONCLUSION The Delaware Contraceptive Access Now initiative substantially increased the number of patients receiving long-acting reversible contraceptives through a single-visit encounter. Our findings suggested that coordinated interventions involving provider and staff training and capital investments that seed device stocking can increase the number of patients receiving same-day long-acting reversible contraceptives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca McColl
- Biden School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
| | - Katie Gifford
- Biden School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
| | - Mary Joan McDuffie
- Biden School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
| | - Michel Boudreaux
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD
| |
Collapse
|