Physician management in primary care

Minor injury resulting in lower-limb loss in diabetic patients

Objective: to identify diabetic patients who had undergone recent amputation of the lower limb, and in whom a possibly avoidable minor injury to the foot had caused infection and gangrene necessitating surgical intervention.

Design: questionnaires, administered to consecutively admitted recent lower-limb amputees, addressing demographic, socio-economic and medical data and containing specific questions on circumstances or events that might have caused a foot lesion that started the infection, gangrene and eventually amputation.

Setting: department of orthopaedic rehabilitation in a rehabilitation hospital.

Patients: 218 recent, lower-limb amputees - due to occlusive arterial disease, with or without diabetes - admitted for prosthetic rehabilitation during 30 months (January 1989 to June 1991).

Results: 56 diabetic and 10 non-diabetic amputees were identified in whom a minor injury had caused the sequence leading to amputation which could have been avoided by adequate attention to the feet and their care.

Conclusions: All diabetic individuals need education regarding self-care and attention to the feet, irrespective of their demographic or socio-economic variables and disease severity. The view is expressed that such an education — particularly when linked to the provision of necessary health services - would be able to reduce the risk of amputation in diabetes mellitus considerably.

Is rheumatoid arthritis care more costly when provided by rheumatologists compared with generalists?

OBJECTIVE

Controversy surrounds the cost-effectiveness of rheumatologist care compared with generalist care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Rheumatologists can provide 2 distinct types of care for RA patients: primary care and specialist care. We sought to examine the relationship between cost and type of care in a population-based cohort of patients with RA.

METHODS

Data regarding specialty of care and use of health services (i.e., total direct medical costs, surgeries, radiographs, laboratory tests, hospital days) were collected from a community sample of 249 patients with RA (defined using the 1987 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria) among Rochester, Minnesota residents > or =35 years of age. In a randomly selected subset of 99 of these RA patients, detailed information on all physician encounters was collected and categorized according to whether or not the care received constituted "primary care" according to the Institute of Medicine definition. Using these data, we evaluated the influence of type of care as well as specialty of provider on utilization. For these analyses, total direct costs included all inpatient and outpatient health care costs incurred by all local providers (excluding outpatient prescription drugs).

RESULTS

The 249 patients with RA (mean age 64 years, 75% women) were followed up for a median of 5.4 years, while the subset of 99 RA patients (mean age 64 years, 77% women) were followed up for a median of 4.7 years. The overall median direct medical costs per person per year were $2,749 and $2,929 for the total cohort and for the subset of 99 patients, respectively. Generalized linear regression analyses (considering all visits of the 249 RA patients) revealed that after adjusting for demographics and disease characteristics, rheumatologist care (compared with nonrheumatologist care) was not associated with higher total direct medical costs (P = 0.85) or more hospital days (P = 0.35), but was associated with slightly more radiographs (P = 0.037) and significantly more laboratory tests (P < 0.0001). When considering only primary care, such care by rheumatologists was, again, not associated with higher total direct medical costs (P = 0.11) or more hospital days (P = 0.69) or more laboratory tests (P = 0.54), but was associated with slightly more radiographs (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Rheumatologist care is not more costly than generalist care for patients with RA. Important differences (especially in the use of laboratory tests) become apparent when the type of care provided as well as the specialty of the provider are considered in the analyses.

Consistency in performance among primary care practitioners

OBJECTIVES

The authors studied the consistency of performance of individual physicians to evaluate the identification of outlier practitioners as a strategy for improving patient care.

METHODS

The authors used a data base containing information on 430 practitioners caring for 6,090 patients in 16 group practices. The authors analyzed inter- and intraphysician differences in performance on the basis of review criteria for 8 patient care guidelines. These criteria allowed for a variety of acceptable clinical strategies, incorporated decision tree logic, and included input from participating practitioners. The authors took steps to maximize validity and controlled for potentially confounding characteristics of patients and practitioners. The authors identified outliers, evaluated the significance of differences between outliers and nonoutliers, and studied variations in performance across cases and guidelines in conformance with guidelines.

RESULTS

The authors identified a few statistically significant outliers. Correlations for performance across cases seen by a given physician were low. The highest positive correlation for performance between any pair of guidelines was 0.32.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of a given practitioner is highly variable from patient to patient and from guideline to guideline. Thus, strategies focusing solely on substandard outliers will miss opportunities to improve performance.

Primary care: specialists or generalists

A critical appraisal of the literature on the cost and quality trade-offs of primary care provided by specialists in comparison with that provided by generalists is presented.

Evaluation of primary care in a community clinic by means of explicit process criteria

This study reports an evaluation of care given at an urban multidisciplinary community family practice clinic. By means of an "indicator-condition" approach, the criteria and rating system developed for the Burlington Randomized Controlled Trial (BRCT) were applied to 103 randomly selected charts demonstrating 124 episodes of care given for seven specific "conditions": otitis media, hypertension, prenatal care, care of the newborn up to the age of 12 months, immunization up to the age of 24 months, depression and urinary tract infection. Overall, 83 (67%) of the episodes of care studied were rated adequate or superior. The proportion of such episodes varied from 33% for hypertension to 81% for care of the newborn. No statistically significant differences were found between these results and those of the BRCT. A total of 48 instances of inadequate care were noted, of which 21 (44%) were omissions in patient management. Inadequate preventive care and care of chronic diseases was more common than inadequate care of acute infectious diseases. The method of primary care assessment used was found to be both practical and inexpensive.

Relationships of physician characteristics to performance quality and improvement

The quality of ambulatory medical care provided by 1,135 physicians in five separate practice settings in the Midwest was measured using predetermined process criteria. Specialists performed better in their own areas of specialized training than did family/general practitioners or specialists performing outside their specialty areas. Physicians with fewer years of practice performed somewhat better than physicians with more years since medical school graduation. Board certification was not consistently related to performance. Performances of the physicians improved following quality assurance interventions in these sites. Differences in the rates of change in performance quality were not consistently related to any of the physician characteristics studied.

Developing criteria for quality of assessment: effect of the Delphi technique

We examined the effect of the Delphi iteration procedure in developing explicit criteria for ambulatory care assessment. Practicing internists chose items they believed to be essential with regard to the care of certain specified conditions. The initial responses were tabulated and "fed-back" to the participants. The second round of criteria selection, with the first-round summary available, produced few and relatively minor changes in the items chosen by group consensus.

Quantitative assessment of the quality of medical care provided in five family practices before and after attachment of a family practice nurse

The standards of patient care were maintained in five urban medical practices after the introduction of family practice nurses. Evaluations were achieved before and after their appointment by the indicator condition method. Minimal explicit criteria for the management of patients with 12 indicator conditions and by the use of 14 drugs were approved by an ad hoc peer group of community physicians. These cirteria were applied to the five practices by the use of a single-blind design and the abstraction of unaltered medical records. A standardized score for each practic e permitted comparison of scores for the management of indicator conditions and for the clinical use of drugs before and after attachment of the family practice nurses. For each of the indicator conditions and the drugs assessed in the five practices similar levels of adequacy were observed in the two study periods. These explicit (objective) audit resutls agreed with the implicit (subjective) assessments of the family practice nurses by their physician colleagues.

The ABCs of educating the patient with chronic bronchial asthma. How we do it

Total rehabilitation of the chronic asthmatic child needs 1) a philosophy, 2) an objective, and 3) a method. The philosophy is to help the child lead as normal a life as possible. The objective is to accomplish this in his home, in his play and in his school. The method to accomplish this must include education and understanding of the disease by the patient and his family.