The surgical margin in soft-tissue sarcoma

The prognostic significance of surgical resection margins for local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in sarcoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection with microscopically negative margins constitutes one of the key elements of a curative therapeutic approach for localized sarcomas. However, the prognostic value of quantitative margin width remains controversial. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of margin status and margin width for local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), and overall survival.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 210 patients undergoing resection of localized sarcoma between 1997 and 2018 at a national sarcoma reference center.

RESULTS

Logistic regression did not reveal an effect of metric margin width as a prognostic factor for LR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98, p = 0.574), DR (OR = 1, p = 0.908), or overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-1.20, p = 0.609). Subgroup analysis revealed no differences between complete first resections (R0) and re-resections (re-R0) following unplanned R1-resections for LR (p = 0.727) and overall survival (p = 0.125), but a significantly higher DR-rate in re-R0 cases (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving a negative margin is essential in sarcoma surgery, however, metric margin width was not associated with disease-specific outcomes. Re-resection of unplanned R1-resections should be performed to control for LR and overall survival rates. As re-R0 cases were at significantly higher risk of DR, these patients should be followed up closely in standardized surveillance protocols.

[Predictive factors assessment of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy of soft tissue sarcomas]

PURPOSE

Conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy in presence of local recurrence risk factors is standard treatment of soft tissue sarcomas, a group of rare and heterogeneous tumours. Radiotherapy is performed before or after surgery. In neoadjuvant setting, late radiation-induced toxicity is reduced and pathological response to radiotherapy could be achieved. A complete pathological response to radiotherapy has recently been shown to predict better survival. Our study aims at identifying predictive factors of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy (clinical, radiological or histological) of soft tissue sarcomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical, imaging (MRI: perilesional oedema, necrosis, tumour heterogeneity, vasculonervous relationships) and pathological (pathological subtype, tumour grade, anticipated/obtained resection quality) data were retrospectively collected. Tumour response (imaging and pathological), patient outcome, acute and late radiation-induced toxicity, predictive factors of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy were studied. The 2-test or exact-Fisher test (qualitative variables) and by Student's t-test or Kruskal-Wallis test (quantitative variables) were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

From April 2017 to April 2021, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (50Gy in 25 fractions) followed by surgical excision was performed to 36 consecutive patients with liposarcomas (n=17/36), or undifferentiated sarcomas (n=8/36). MRI response was complete in 1 patient, partial in 9 patients (n=9/36, 25%), stable in 21 patients (n=21/36, 58%) or in progression in 5 patients (n=5/36, 14%). Pathological response was observed in 22 patients (61%). No grade 3-4 acute radiation-induced toxicity was observed. Regarding late toxicity, 28% of patients had grade 1-2 oedema (n=10/36), 39% had a grade 1 fibrosis (n=14/36), and 30% grade 1 pain (n=11/36). No predictive factors of response to radiotherapy was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is well-tolerated. No clinical, radiological or pathological predictive factors was identified for radiotherapy tumour response.

Endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity soft tissue sarcomas with bone involvement

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bone resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction (EPR) in the setting of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) management is rare and incurs unique challenges. We aim to report on the surgical and oncological outcomes of this relatively previously undocumented cohort.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data for patients who required EPRs following resection of STSs of the lower extremity. Following inclusion criteria, we assessed 29 cases of EPR for primary STS of the lower limb.

RESULTS

The mean age was 54 years (range 18-84). Of the 29 patients, there were 6 total femur, 11 proximal femur, 4 intercalary, and 8 distal femur EPRs. Fourteen of 29 patients (48%) underwent re-operations for surgical complications, with 9 relating to infection (31%). When a matched cohort analysis was performed comparing our cohort to STSs that did not necessitate EPR, a reduced rate of overall survival and metastasis-free survival was found in those requiring EPR.

CONCLUSION

This series identifies a high rate of complication from EPRs performed for STS. Patients should be cautioned about the high rate of infection, surgical complications, and lower overall survival in this setting.

A Size-Based Criteria for Flap Reconstruction After Thigh-Adductor, Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Resection

BACKGROUND

Resection of soft-tissue sarcomas from the adductor compartment is associated with significant complications. Free/pedicled flaps often are used for wound closure, but their effect on healing is unclear. We compared wound complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes for patients undergoing flap reconstruction or primary closure following resection of adductor sarcomas.

METHODS

A total of 177 patients underwent resection of an adductor sarcoma with primary closure (PrC) or free/pedicled flap reconstruction (FR). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared, as well as wound complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes (TESS/MSTS87/MSTS93). To examine the relative benefit of flap reconstruction, number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 143 patients underwent PrC and 34 had FR, 68% of which were pedicled. There were few differences in demographic, tumor, or treatment characteristics. No significant difference was found in the rate of wound complications. Length of stay was significantly longer in FR (18 days vs. PrC 8 days; p < 0.01). Oncologic and functional outcomes were similar over 5 years follow-up. Uncomplicated wound healing occurred more often in FR compared with PrC for tumors with ≥15 cm (NNT = 8.4) or volumes ≥ 800 ml (NNT = 8.4). Tumors ≤ 336 ml do not benefit from a flap, whereas those > 600 ml are 1.5 times more likely to heal uneventfully after flap closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although flap use prolonged hospitalization, it decreased wound healing complications for larger tumors, and in all sized tumors, it demonstrated similar functional and oncologic outcomes to primary closure. Our size-based treatment criteria can help to identify patients with large adductor sarcomas who could benefit from flap reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

(Retrospective cohort study).

[Current Therapy Standards for Soft Tissue Sarcomas in the Head and Neck Area - Part 1]

The present work discusses soft tissue sarcoma in the head and neck area, due to the new published German S3-Guideline "adult soft tissue sarcoma". The head and neck surgeon plays the central role in the diagnosis and treatment of the vast majority of cases. It is crucial to admit the patients immediately to specialized centers for diagnoses and specific treatment. Regarding correct diagnostic procedures, in contrast to squamous cell carcinoma, a larger accidental excisional biopsy within the tumor tissue is strongly prognostic negative. After confirmation of histology and tumor extension, it is mandatory to discuss the interdisciplinary treatment concept. If possible, introduction of the patient in ongoing clinical studies is key.

Outcomes of Planned Marginal and Wide Resection of Sarcomas Associated with Major Vascular Structures in Extremities

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas of lower and upper extremities may sometimes be in close contact with neurovascular structures. In such cases, it is controversial that whether en bloc resection and vascular reconstruction to reach wider surgical margins or planned marginal resection with the help of adjuvant therapies should be preferred. This study aimed to determine surgical and oncological outcomes of planned marginal and wide resection of extremity sarcomas that are associated with major vascular structures in the extremities. The collected database of 54 patients treated by the same orthopedic and vascular surgeon for primary or locally recurrent soft and bone tissue sarcoma of extremities was retrospectively reviewed. Eligible subjects for this study were patients diagnosed with upper and lower extremity soft and bone tissue sarcomas that encased a maximum of 50% of the circumference of the major vascular structures, requiring limb-sparing resection. When microscopic positive (19 patients, 33.9%) and negative cases' (35 patients, 66.1%) surgical margins were compared, local recurrence, metastasis, amputation, and tumor type (soft/bone) parameters showed no statistically significant difference. When metastatic and non-metastatic patients were compared, it was shown that bone tumors metastasized more than soft tissue tumors (p = 0.001). However, there was no difference between metastasis and amputation, histopathology, grade, nerve involvement, surgical margins, or local recurrences. The mean survival was 1460.6 ± 137.4 days, and the 6-year mortality was 87.5%. Anesthetic and surgical complication rates may be higher since en bloc resection surgeries of large tumors with vascular reconstructions take a very long time. Therefore, we suggest marginal resection with sub-adventitial dissection in those locations and wide resection at other areas according to the surgeon's experiences about safe margin with the contribution of radiotherapy.

Neoadjuvant radiation for cutaneous and soft tissue angiosarcoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant radiation (NRT) is frequently utilized in soft tissue sarcomas to increase local control. Its utility in cutaneous and soft tissue angiosarcoma remains poorly defined.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) evaluating patients with clinically localized, surgically resected angiosarcomas. Factors associated with receipt of NRT in the overall cohort and margin positivity in treatment naïve patients were identified by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Of 597 patients, 27 (4.5%) received NRT. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, p = 0.025), tumor size more than or equal to 5 cm (OR 3.16, p = 0.02), and extremity tumor location (OR 3.99, p = 0.04) were associated with receipt of NRT. All patients who received NRT achieved an R0 resection (p = 0.03) compared with 17.9% of patients without NRT. Factors associated with risk of margin positivity included tumor size more than or equal to 5 cm (OR 1.85, p = 0.01), and head/neck location (OR 2.24, p = 0.006). NRT was not significantly associated with improved survival (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

NRT improves rates of R0 resection but is infrequently utilized in cutaneous and soft tissue angiosarcoma. Increased usage of NRT, particularly for patients with lesions more than or equal to 5 cm, or head and neck location, may help achieve complete resections.

Impact of surgical margin on survival in extremity soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of surgical margin status on the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains to be clearly defined. The evidence regarding the impact of surgical margins on survival is limited by retrospective single-institution cohort studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of surgical margin status on patient survival in extremity STS.

METHODS

A literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register electronic databases, and a manual search of reference lists of original studies was performed. The following text words and/or Medical Subject Heading terms were searched: (neoplasm) or/and (sarcoma) and/or (connective tissue) and/or (soft tissue) and/or (extremity) and/or (extremity) and/or (surgical margin).

RESULTS

Six selected studies that reported a total of 2917 cases of extremity STS were published between 1994 and 2013. All the eligible studies were observational cohort studies, and the sample size ranged from 95 to 1261 patients. A meta-analysis of 6 studies showed that a positive surgical margin predicted poor 5-year OS in a random-effects model (summary hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.17). Moderate heterogeneity was observed among the studies (P < .075; heterogeneity, 45.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports the hypothesis that adequate surgical margins are associated with improved survival in extremity STS.

Planned combined onco-plastic (COP) surgical approach improves oncologic outcomes in soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Combined modality of radiotherapy and surgery is the standard of treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The goal of this study was to assess whether a Combined Onco-Plastic (COP) surgical approach in the setting of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy can improve the oncologic outcomes of STS and reduce the rate of wound complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients with STS treated at a single sarcoma centre (St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne) between 2007 and 2018. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they have received the COP approach or were closed primarily by the orthopaedic surgeon. We analysed oncological outcomes and rate of wound complications.

RESULTS

A total of 546 patients with comparable demographics and tumor characteristics were included. The COP approach was performed in 75.6% of the patients. Wide margins were obtained in 97.4% of the cases, and this was significantly higher in the COP group (p < 0.001). The cumulative rate of local recurrence was 4.9%, with a 52% risk reduction in the COP approach, although this reduction was not significant (HR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.21-1.06; p = 0.070). The COP approach had better disease free survival (DFS) (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.45-2.37; p < 0.001) and Overall survival (risk of death aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.79; p = 0.004). The overall wound complication rate was 18.6% with no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

A planned collaboration between the orthopaedic oncologist and the plastic surgeon is beneficial in the treatment of STS after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy, allowing remarkably good oncological outcomes and a low rate of wound complications.

Re-excision after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas: Long-term results

BACKGROUND

Unplanned excisions of soft tissue sarcomas are still not infrequent events with patients presenting to referral Centers after having received an inadequate surgical treatment. In literature, both the wait-and-see policy and the "aggressive" management with a re-excision have been advocated. The purposes of this study were to analyze the incidence of detectable residual tumor in surgical specimens following a re-excision and to verify the long-term results of patients treated with a re-excision after previous unplanned excision.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 131 patients affected by localized soft tissue sarcoma (95 high grade; 36 low grade) of the limbs or the superficial trunk treated at our Institution, from 2000 to 2013, with a re-excision after a previous unplanned inadequate excision. Site, size, depth, histotype, grade, adjuvant therapies, time from unplanned surgery to re-excision were recorded and evaluated in association with clinical results. We specifically evaluated the disease-specific survival, local recurrence free survival, distant metastases free survival and the event free survival.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up for living patients was 10.9 years (median 11.2 years), with a follow-up ranging from 14 to 227 months. 34% of patients underwent a re-excision within the first 2 months after unplanned surgery, while 66% of patients at more than 2 months. Residual detectable tumor cells were found on histological examination in 54% of re-excisions. A wide margin was obtained in 123 cases, a persisting positive margin in 8 patients. Disease-specific survival was 93.5%, 91.6% and 89.6% at 5, 10 and 15 years for whole series and 90.9%, 88.2% and 85.7% for high grade tumors. Event-free survival in patients affected by high grade tumors rated 75.0% at 5 years, 72.4% at 10 years and 72.4% at 15 years. Local recurrence free survival in high grade tumors was 87.6%, 86.2% and 86.2% at 5, 10 and 15 years. The grade of the tumor (high grade) and the initial dimension of the tumor (≥5 cm) were associated with worst survival. High grade tumor impacted negatively also on local recurrence free survival and event free survival. Instead, the initial size of the tumor significantly affected the event free survival but not the local recurrence free survival. No significant differences of outcome were found analyzing tumor depth, time interval to re-excision, presence of residual tumor or margins.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results and literature findings, we believe that surgeons should offer a re-excision procedure in those patients presenting with an inadequate excision of a high grade soft-tissue tumor, in particular with tumors larger than 5 cm before excision. Indeed, if an adequate second treatment is performed with surgery ± radiotherapy, the long-term results of patients receiving a re-excision after unplanned excision of a high grade soft tissue sarcoma seem to be comparable to the results generally reported for wide primary excisions. More debatable is whether to perform a re-excision or not in patients with low-grade tumors. Perhaps, in this latter group a wait and see policy can eventually be offered as well as in high grade tumors when a re-excision procedure could involve major surgery or significantly affect postoperative function.

Surgical Resection Margin Classifications for High-grade Pleomorphic Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremity or Trunk After Neoadjuvant Cytotoxic Therapy

Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities or trunk are often resected after treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Adequate surgical resection margins for sarcomas after neoadjuvant cytotoxic therapy are not well characterized. Minimum surgical resection margins required for local control of primary, high-grade, pleomorphic soft tissue sarcomas treated with neoadjuvant therapy was assessed by competing risk regression in a series of 166 cases. Optimal tumor clearance was determined to be ≥1 mm. Predictive accuracy of three commonly used resection margin classification schemes (American Joint Committee on Cancer, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, and the margin distance method) were comparable. However, diagnostic performance of a binary system (positive vs. negative) was more specific than margin distance classification (positive or <1 vs. ≥1 mm from tumor), but less sensitive in predicting local recurrence. The American Joint Committee on Cancer R classification (R0 vs. R1/R2) seems to adequately stratify patients by risk for local recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent surgical resection. Furthermore, close but negative resection margins (<1 mm from tumor) appear sufficient for local control of high-grade pleomorphic soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity or trunk in this clinical setting, with minimal reduction in the risk of local recurrence with increasing margin width or surgical clearance.

Surgical resection margin classifications for high-grade pleomorphic soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity or trunk: definitions of adequate resection margins and recommendations for sampling margins from primary resection specimens

Adequacy of surgical resection margins for soft tissue sarcomas are poorly defined because of the various classifications and definitions used in prior studies of heterogeneous patient cohorts and inconsistent margin sampling protocols. Surgical resection margins of 166 primary, high-grade, pleomorphic sarcomas of the extremity or trunk were classified according to American Joint Committee on Cancer R and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society categories, as well as by metric distance and tissue composition. None of the cases were treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Multivariable competing risk regression models were evaluated and optimal surgical resection margins for each classification system were defined. Minimum safe tumor clearance was 5 mm without use of adjuvant radiotherapy and 1 mm with adjuvant radiotherapy. Predictive accuracy of margin classification systems was compared by area under receiver-operating characteristic curves generated from logistic regression of 2½-year local recurrence-free survival and other standard tests of diagnostic accuracy. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and margin distance classifications performed similarly, both of which showed higher sensitivity and negative predictive value compared to the American Joint Committee on Cancer R classification. The prognostic power of close or positive margins in prediction models significantly increased when six or more slides were submitted for assessment of surgical resection margins. Surgical resection margins for soft tissue sarcoma should be reported using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society classification or metric distance to the closest resection margin. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society wide/radical margins or tumor clearances of 5 mm (without adjuvant radiotherapy) or 1 mm (with adjuvant radiotherapy) appear to define the minimum safe surgical resection margins necessary to decrease the likelihood of local recurrence of high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas of the extremity or trunk.

Patterns of care of superficial soft tissue sarcomas: it is not always just a lump

AIM

Superficial soft tissue sarcomas (S-STS) are generally considered low-risk tumors and have an excellent prognosis when treated with appropriate surgery and adjuvant therapy. However, they are often misdiagnosed then mistreated, leading to significant morbidity. This study aims to examine the patterns of care and outcomes of patients with S-STS, comparing those initially managed through sarcoma units versus elsewhere.

METHODS

Patients with S-STS from Prince of Wales Hospital in NSW (1995-2013) and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Victoria (2009-2013) were identified from a national sarcoma database. Baseline variables, treatment and disease outcomes were recorded. Statistical tests performed included univariate and multivariate analyses, chi-square tests, as well as the Kaplan-Meier method for 5-year local recurrence and survival rates.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were identified, with 35% initially managed at a sarcoma unit and 65% elsewhere. Patients initially managed at sarcoma units had larger tumors (>5 cm 39% vs 17%; P  =  0.036) with a trend to higher grade (61% vs 48%; P = 0.39). Patients that were initially managed outside a sarcoma unit more often underwent open surgical biopsies (P < 0.0005), had multiple operations (P < 0.0005) and had higher rates of local recurrences (24% vs 6.5%, P  =  0.038). They also had lower 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates (P = 0.022), but had higher metastasis-free survival (P = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, only larger STS size and male gender predicted for poorer metastasis-free survival (P = 0.042 and 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with S-STS initially managed outside specialized sarcoma units undergo more operations, with risk of greater morbidity, and have greater risk of local recurrence.

Combined chemoradiation for head and neck region myxofibrosarcoma of the maxillary sinus

Aims and background

Adult sarcomas of the head and neck region (HNSs) are considered a rare clinicopathological entity. They account for only 2–15% of all adult sarcomas and for less than 1% of all head and neck malignancies. The preferred initial treatment option is wide surgical excision. Whenever surgery is considered infeasible, a frontline combined-modality approach including radiotherapy and chemotherapy might be proposed. We here report on a case of localized sarcoma of the maxillary sinus treated with induction chemotherapy and subsequent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), achieving a persistent complete remission status.

Methods

A 66-year-old man was referred to our institution hospital for left-sided facial pain with swollen left cheek and ipsilateral facial palsy. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a mass within the left maxillary sinus extending to the orbital floor and adjacent alveolar bones. Histological examination of the biopsy specimen demonstrated a myxofibrosarcoma. The patient underwent induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 (days 1–8) and taxotere 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles and sequential simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) IMRT up to a total dose of 70 Gy/35 fractions to the macroscopic disease with 59.5 Gy/35 fractions to the level IB-II lymph nodes in the left neck.

Results

Treatment was well tolerated with mild acute toxicity. Complete remission was achieved at restaging MRI 6 months after the end of the combined modality approach. The patient remains in complete, unmaintained clinical and instrumental complete remission 18 months after treatment, with no late side effects.

Conclusion

Combination therapy with induction chemotherapy and sequential SIB-IMRT could therefore be a promising modality for head and neck sarcomas, allowing for simultaneous tumor control and normal tissue sparing.

Analysis of Margin Classification Systems for Assessing the Risk of Local Recurrence After Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection

Purpose To compare the ability of margin classification systems to determine local recurrence (LR) risk after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection. Methods Two thousand two hundred seventeen patients with nonmetastatic extremity and truncal STS treated with surgical resection and multidisciplinary consideration of perioperative radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Margins were coded by residual tumor (R) classification (in which microscopic tumor at inked margin defines R1), the R+1mm classification (in which microscopic tumor within 1 mm of ink defines R1), and the Toronto Margin Context Classification (TMCC; in which positive margins are separated into planned close but positive at critical structures, positive after whoops re-excision, and inadvertent positive margins). Multivariate competing risk regression models were created. Results By R classification, LR rates at 10-year follow-up were 8%, 21%, and 44% in R0, R1, and R2, respectively. R+1mm classification resulted in increased R1 margins (726 v 278, P < .001), but led to decreased LR for R1 margins without changing R0 LR; for R0, the 10-year LR rate was 8% (range, 7% to 10%); for R1, the 10-year LR rate was 12% (10% to 15%) . The TMCC also showed various LR rates among its tiers ( P < .001). LR rates for positive margins on critical structures were not different from R0 at 10 years (11% v 8%, P = .18), whereas inadvertent positive margins had high LR (5-year, 28% [95% CI, 19% to 37%]; 10-year, 35% [95% CI, 25% to 46%]; P < .001). Conclusion The R classification identified three distinct risk levels for LR in STS. An R+1mm classification reduced LR differences between R1 and R0, suggesting that a negative but < 1-mm margin may be adequate with multidisciplinary treatment. The TMCC provides additional stratification of positive margins that may aid in surgical planning and patient education.

The Width of the Surgical Margin Does Not Influence Outcomes in Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treated With Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is unclear whether the quantitative width of the surgical margin influences outcomes in patients with extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 382 patients with localized extremity or truncal STS who underwent limb-sparing surgery and RT from 1983 to 2010, and we analyzed the significance of resection margin status and quantitative margin width on outcomes.

RESULTS

Surgical margins were positive in 68 (18%) patients and negative in 314 (82%) patients. For those patients with a reported quantitative margin width (n = 235), the width of the negative margin was ≤1 mm (n = 128), >1 mm and ≤5 mm (n = 79), and >5 mm (n = 28). At a median follow-up of 82 months, the local recurrence rates were 5.4% and 11.8% for margin-negative and margin-positive patients, respectively. There were no differences in the rates of local or distant recurrence nor of any survival outcome based on the quantitative width of the surgical margin, provided that it was negative.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing RT and limb-sparing surgery for STS, achieving a negative margin is essential for optimizing both local control and survival. However, the absolute quantitative width of the negative margin does not significantly influence outcome, and so attempts at wide margins of resection appear to be unnecessary. Importantly, the conclusions drawn from this study must not be applied to those patients undergoing surgery alone as the local treatment of their STS, in which case wider margins of resection may be necessary.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In patients undergoing radiation therapy and limb-sparing surgery for soft tissue sarcoma, the quantitative width of the negative margin does not influence outcome, and so attempts at wide margins of resection appear to be unnecessary, especially when such attempts compromise the functional outcome. Importantly, the conclusions drawn from this study must not be applied to those patients undergoing surgery alone as the local treatment of their soft tissue sarcoma, in which case wider margins of resection may be necessary.

External beam radiation therapy for orthopaedic pathology

External beam radiation therapy is essential in the management of a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, both benign and malignant, including bony and soft-tissue sarcomas, metastatic tumors, pigmented villonodular synovitis, and heterotopic ossification. Radiation therapy, in combination with surgery, helps reduce the functional loss from cancer resections. Although the field of radiation therapy is firmly rooted in physics and radiation biology, its indications and delivery methods are rapidly evolving. External beam radiation therapy mainly comes in the form of four sources of radiotherapy: protons, photons, electrons, and neutrons. Each type of energy has a unique role in treating various pathologies; however, these energy types also have their own distinctive limitations and morbidities.

Lower Limb Core Scale: a new application to evaluate and compare the outcomes of bone and soft-tissue tumours resection and reconstruction

Several methods are used to evaluate the functional outcome of tumour resections and reconstructions in the lower limb. However, one of their most common limitations is that they are specifically developed to evaluate only oncological patients. We introduced the Lower Limb Core Scale (LLCS) to overcome this limitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and subjective results in the lower limb and to evaluate the use of the LLCS. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using various tools to investigate the outcomes. The results of the LLCS were correlated with the results of other functional tests. A total of 44 patients were included in the study. None of the demographic variables correlated with the functional or health-related quality of life (QoL) scores except for gender, whereby male patients had an increased functional score. The correlation between LLCS and other scores was positive (r (2) = 0.77). The satisfactory QoL scores, and functional outcomes scores indicated the LLCS to be a reliable option for general and specific evaluation of lower limb reconstructions. We suggest using the LLCS for comparisons of oncological reconstructions with lower limb reconstructions in different disciplines.

Territorial inequalities in management and conformity to clinical guidelines for sarcoma patients: an exhaustive population-based cohort analysis in the Rhône-Alpes region

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas are rare cancers with great variability in clinical and histopathological presentation. The main objective of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is to standardize diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

From March 2005 to February 2007, all patients diagnosed with localized sarcoma in the Rhône-Alpes region were included in a cohort-based study, to evaluate the compliance of sarcoma management with French guidelines in routine practice and to identify predictive factors for compliance with CGPs.

RESULTS

634 (71 %) patients with localized sarcoma satisfying the inclusion criteria were included out of 891 newly diagnosed sarcomas. Taking into account initial diagnosis until follow-up, overall conformity to CPGs was only 40 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) = 36-44], ranging from 54 % for gastrointestinal stromal tumor to 36 % for soft tissue sarcoma and 42 % for bone sarcoma. In multivariate analysis, primary tumor type [relative risk (RR) = 4.42, 95 % CI = 2.79-6.99, p < 0.001], dedicated multidisciplinary staff before surgery (RR = 4.19, 95 % CI = 2.39-7.35, p < 0.001) and management in specialized hospitals (RR = 3.71, 95 % CI = 2.43-5.66, p < 0.001) were identified as unique independent risk factors for conformity to CPGs for overall treatment sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

With only 40 % of total conformity to CPGs, the conclusions support the improvement of initial sarcoma management and its performance in specialized centres or within specialized dedicated networks.

Planned preservation surgery for soft tissue sarcomas adjacent to critical structures

BACKGROUND

Whether to preserve or sacrifice critical structures (bone, major vessels and major nerves) adjacent to soft tissue sarcomas is still controversial. Referring to characteristic imaging and intraoperative findings, we perform planned preservation surgery for these critical structures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome of soft tissue sarcomas adjacent to critical structures and to validate this procedure.

METHODS

Of 202 cases of soft tissue sarcomas surgically treated at our department of orthopedic surgery from 2004 to 2010, 57 cases (28 %) whose tumors were adjacent to the critical structures were studied. There were 36 men and 21 women. In 32 cases critical structures were preserved, and in 25 resected together with the tumor. The oncological outcome and histological surgical margin were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall survival and local recurrence-free survival rates at 5 years were 75.9 and 83.2 %. In 26 of the 32 (81 %) preserved cases histologically the surgical margin was negative, and in 17 (53 %) radiotherapy could be avoided. Neither overall survival (p = 0.9669) nor local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.7819) differed significantly between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When soft tissue sarcomas are located adjacent to bone or major vessels, by meticulously detaching the periosteum or neurovascular sheath referring to characteristic imaging and intraoperative findings, a histologically negative surgical margin can be achieved in the majority, allowing avoidance of postoperative radiotherapy. Planned preservation surgery provided no significant adverse effect on survival or local recurrence rates, validating this procedure.

Uterine leiomyosarcoma management, outcome, and associated molecular biomarkers: a single institution's experience

BACKGROUND

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is an aggressive, rapidly progressive tumor lacking clinical and molecular predictors of outcome.

METHODS

ULMS patients (n = 349) were classified by disease status at presentation to MDACC as having intra-abdominal (n = 157) or distant metastatic disease (n = 192). Patient, tumor, treatment, and outcome variables were retrospectively retrieved. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor and control tissues from these patients (n = 109) were assembled in a tissue microarray and evaluated for hormone receptors and markers of angiogenesis, cell-cycle progression and survival. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were correlatively analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival (DSS) for the cohort was 42 and 27 %, respectively. Patients with primary intra-abdominal tumors had better outcomes than those with recurrent intraperitoneal tumors. Whites had a more favorable prognosis. In patients with intra-abdominal tumors, only mitotic count >10M/10HPF portended poorer prognosis. Patients with pulmonary metastasis had improved outcomes with "curative" metastasectomy. ULMS samples exhibited loss of ER and PR expression, overexpressed Ki-67, and altered p53, Rb, p16, cytoplasmic β-catenin, EGFR, PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β, and AXL levels. Metastatic tumors had increased VEGF, Ki-67, and survivin expression versus localized disease. Survivin and β-catenin expression were associated with intraperitoneal recurrence; high bcl-2 expression predicted longer DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of both clinicopathologic factors and immunohistochemical biomarkers in ULMS identified several prognostic clinical and molecular factors, suggesting that further study may lead to improved ULMS understanding and treatment.

Functional reconstruction of sarcoma defects utilising innervated free flaps

Soft-tissue reconstruction following preoperative radiotherapy and wide resection of soft tissue sarcoma remains a challenge. Pedicled and free tissue transfers are an essential part of limb sparing surgery. We report 22 cases of sarcoma treated with radiotherapy and wide excision followed by one-stage innervated free or pedicled musculocutaneous flap transfers. The resection involved the upper limb in 3 cases, the lower limb in 17, and the abdominal wall in 2. The flaps used for the reconstruction were mainly latissimus dorsi and gracilis. The range of motion was restored fully in 14 patients. The muscle strength of the compartment reconstructed was of grades 4 and 5 in all patients except one. The overall function was excellent in all the cases with functional scores of 71.2% in the upper limb and 84% in the lower limb. The only 2 major complications were flap necrosis, both revised with another flap, one of which was innervated with restoration of function. Innervated flaps are valuable alternatives for reconstruction after sarcoma resection in the extremity and in the abdominal wall. The excellent functional results are encouraging, and we believe that innervated muscle reconstruction should be encouraged in the treatment of sarcoma after radiotherapy and wide resection.

Reliability of Margin Assessment after Surgery for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: The SSG Experience

Surgery remains the mainstay of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment and has been the primary treatment for the majority of patients in Scandinavia during the last 30 years although the use of adjuvant radiotherapy has increased. Patient and treatment characteristics have been recorded in the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) Register since 1987. When the effect of new radiotherapy guidelines from 1998 was evaluated, the reliability of surgical margin assessments among different Scandinavian institutions was investigated. Margins were reevaluated by a panel of sarcoma surgeons, studying pathology and surgical reports from 117 patients, randomly selected among 470 recorded patients treated between 1998–2003. In 80% of cases, the panel agreed with the original classification. Disagreement was most frequent when addressing the distinction between marginal and wide margins. Considered the element of judgment inherent in all margin assessment, we find this reliability acceptable for using the Register for studies of local control of STS.

Critical study of resection margins in adult soft-tissue sarcoma surgery

INTRODUCTION

Resection margins constitute a recognized risk factor for local recurrence, but their impact on survival is less clear.

HYPOTHESIS

Infiltrative proliferation and satellite nodules are prognostic factors for local and systemic aggressiveness.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 105 patients under curative treatment, resection quality was assessed on UICC criteria (R0/R1) and on a modified version (R0M/R1M) taking account of proliferation contours and satellite nodules for narrow margins (<1mm). Uni- and multi-variate analysis was performed, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared on log-rank.

RESULTS

Mean 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 0.64 [0.52-0.76] after R1 surgery, 0.9 [0.85-0.95] after R0, 0.64 [0.519-0.751] after R1M and 0.92 [0.87-0.96] after R0M. Resection type according to R classification correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.028), but not with metastasis-free survival (MFS) (P=0.156). Resection type according to RM classification correlated with DFS and MFS. Multivariate analysis disclosed correlations between LRFS rate and RM resection type (HR 6.77 [1.78-25.7], P=0.005), DFS rate and RM resection type (HR 2.83 [1.47-5.43], P=0.001) and grade (HR=3.17 [1.38-7.27], P=0.003), and MFS and grade (HR=3.96 [1.50-10.5], P=0.006).

DISCUSSION

The microscopic aspect of the proliferation contours and presence of satellite nodules were confirmed as prognostic factors for local and systemic aggressiveness. They impact both disease-free survival and metastasis-free survival in case of margins less than 1mm. Their systematic consideration may help identify patients with elevated systemic risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Surgical management for malignant tumors of the thumb

BACKGROUND

Malignant tumors of the thumb can be treated surgically with either wide local excision with reconstruction or amputation. Local excision of tumors in the thumb and hand often requires closer resection margin than at other sites, and there is also a need for tissue transfer from a donor site for reconstruction. Primary thumb amputation allows local tumor control while avoiding donor-site morbidity, but comes at great functional cost. We conducted this retrospective case review to assess the outcomes of thumb-sparing wide excisions and primary thumb amputations for malignant thumb tumors.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 23 patients who were surgically treated for malignant tumors of the thumb at our center from 1996 to 2005. We reviewed patient demographics, tumor pathology, extent of resection, postoperative margin status, adjuvant therapy, recurrence, and survival. Functional outcomes were scored using the Muscular Skeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) rating system.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients underwent definitive surgery: 14 thumb-sparing wide excisions and 9 amputations (five at the interphalangeal joint, three at the metacarpophalangeal joint, and one at the forearm). Median follow-up was 58 months (range, 5-156 months). All patients had negative margins. One patient developed a local tumor recurrence (following below-elbow amputation for a soft tissue sarcoma) while three patients developed distant metastases and died from their disease (two patients had melanomas and one had a soft tissue sarcoma). The median MSTS functional score was 28 (IQR, 27-29) for the entire cohort. Two patients that underwent amputation at the metcarpophalangeal joint without reconstruction had the lowest scores of 11 and 17.

CONCLUSION

There was a low incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis in this study, and these events appeared to be related to the underlying disease rather than the surgery performed. Thumb-sparing wide excision and amputation at the interphalangeal joint both give acceptable functional outcomes, though reconstruction should be strongly considered for patients undergoing amputation at the metacarpophalangeal joint.

[Surgical margins in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities]

Negative surgical margins (R0 resection) play a key role in the prevention of local recurrences of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities in the multimodal therapy concept. The prognostic relevance for long-term survival is still under dispute. Despite the fact that numerous recommendations and guidelines have existed for over 100 years, strong evidence-based data from prospective randomized studies are still not available today. These studies should include parameters like tumor localization, subtype and biological aggressiveness. Recommendations as to surgical therapy diverge considerably. They range from amputation and compartment resection to centimetre and millimetre surgical margins. The present article analyses currently available data and definitions and discusses the impact on functional restriction, lymph drainage, local recurrence and the perioperative irradiation field. In the absence of surgical standards, it is doubtful whether existing studies and multicenter trials currently underway are valid. Close co-operation between surgeon and pathologist is imperative to further substantiate the significance of histological examinations and resection margins.

Large resection and reconstruction of primary parietal thoracic sarcoma: a multidisciplinary approach on 11 patients at minimum 2-years follow-up

BACKGROUND

Thoracic sarcomas are rare, and resection can leave behind defects that require significant reconstruction by the multidisciplinary surgical team. The aim of this study is to review the experience of our regional referral centre with primary thoracic tumor resection and thoracic reconstruction.

METHODS

We have reviewed the treatment of all chest wall tumors resected at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital in Western Australia over a 5-year period. There were 11 cases in total that involved removal of deep muscle, ribs and/or sternum.

RESULTS

In the six cases that required bony resection, the surgical team utilized a Gore-Tex (e-PTFE) mesh prosthesis to allow immediate closure of the defect, whilst five other closures were achievable using primary layered closure alone. Four patients had postoperative complications, including one who required prosthesis removal. Mean length of hospital stay was 5 days. No 30-day or 6-month mortality was recorded. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 24 months, and all patients were alive and free of disease at their most recent follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study concurs with previous literature indicating that thoracic tumor resection and immediate reconstruction often involving use of prosthetic mesh is a safe and effective one stage surgical procedure for a variety of chest wall defects with low postoperative morbidity.

Functional and oncological outcome following marginal excision of well-differentiated forearm liposarcoma with nerve involvement

PURPOSE

Liposarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in adults. It is often low-grade and can occasionally involve neurovascular structures. We present the functional and oncological outcome resulting from planned marginal excision of a series of forearm low-grade liposarcomas with nerve involvement.

METHODS

The Oxford tumor registry was used to identify cases of histologically proven, well-differentiated liposarcoma of the forearm, with nerve involvement, treated surgically between 1997 and 2006. Nerve involvement was identified clinically with symptoms or signs of nerve compression, or by images showing direct contact of the tumor with a nerve on magnetic resonance imaging. This was then further defined at the time of surgery as tumor abutting (capsular involvement) or encasing a peripheral nerve. Demographic and clinical data were collected and oncological outcome was assessed by noting local and distant recurrence during follow-up. Postoperative functional outcome was assessed using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Scores.

RESULTS

Eight cases were identified, 6 with preoperative neurological symptoms. The total group comprised 6 men and 2 women with a mean age of 61 (range, 30-71) years. At surgery, all had their tumors successfully excised, with preservation of the involved nerves. In those with preoperative neurological symptoms, complete recovery occurred by 18 months after surgery. The average follow-up was 5 years (range, 3-9 y). There were no cases of either local or distant recurrence of disease, with a mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score of 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Planned marginal excision of a well-differentiated liposarcoma, arising in the forearm and involving nerve, can result in excellent functional and oncological outcome.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Positive surgical margins in soft tissue sarcoma treated with preoperative radiation: is a postoperative boost necessary?

PURPOSE

For patients with an extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with preoperative radiotherapy and surgically excised with positive margins, we retrospectively reviewed whether a postoperative radiation boost reduced the risk of local recurrence (LR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 216 patients with positive margins after resection of an extremity STS treated between 1986 and 2003 were identified from our institution's prospectively collected database. Patient demographics, radiation therapy parameters including timing and dose, classification of positive margin status, reasons for not administering a postoperative boost, and oncologic outcome were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 216 patients with a positive surgical margin, 52 patients were treated with preoperative radiation therapy alone (50 Gy), whereas 41 received preoperative radiation therapy plus a postoperative boost (80% received 16 Gy postoperatively for a total of 66 Gy). There was no difference in baseline tumor characteristics between the two groups. Six of 52 patients in the group receiving preoperative radiation alone developed a LR compared with 9 of 41 in the boost group. Five-year estimated LR-free survivals were 90.4% and 73.8%, respectively (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that including the postoperative radiation boost after preoperative radiation and a margin-positive excision did not provide an advantage in preventing LR for patients treated with external beam radiotherapy. Given that higher radiation doses placed patients at greater risk for late complications such as fracture, fibrosis, edema, and joint stiffness, judicious avoidance of the postoperative boost while maintaining an equivalent rate of local control can reduce the risk of these difficult-to-treat morbidities.

Evaluating surgery quality in soft tissue sarcoma

To identify pertinent indicators for oncologic outcomes in assessing surgery in soft tissue sarcomas, only local recurrences are considered here. Functional outcomes and treatment morbidity, equally important end-points for evaluating surgery quality, are less frequently reported and are not taken into account in this review. Herein, we review recent publications reporting indicators of surgery quality in soft tissue sarcoma treatment. Local recurrence-free interval is the major end-point in evaluating the quality of surgery. Disease-free survival should not be used because the risk factors for metastases are different from those for local recurrence. Five-year local recurrence-free estimations for limb and trunk wall sarcoma should be below 20%, and best approach 10%. The risk of local recurrence depends on tumour biology (i.e. grade) and quality of surgery as defined by the quality of margins. Better than margin width as measured on the tumour specimen, margin quality determined consensually between surgeons and pathologists is the best indicator for local outcome. Quality of margin should be expressed according the UICC residual disease definitions (R0: in sano, R1: microscopic residual disease, R2: macroscopic residual disease). Other important indicators for surgery quality are treatment in specialised centres, a planned, organised surgery, and treatment within a multidisciplinary team. Soft tissue sarcoma should also be treated in specialised centres. Surgery quality depends on obtained margins that are determined best by close collaboration between the surgeon and the pathologist.

Results of limb-salvage surgery with vascular reconstruction for soft tissue sarcoma in the lower extremity: comparison between only arterial and arterovenous reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Reports on vascular reconstruction in conjunction with limb salvage techniques for soft tissue sarcomas in the lower extremity have been published. The aim of this study was to investigate the necessity for venous reconstruction by comparing the results of arterial reconstruction alone and those of arteriovenous reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-five (6.7%) of 373 patients underwent vascular resections for lower limb soft tissue sarcomas. Only arterial reconstruction was performed for 12 patients. Arteriovenous reconstruction was performed for 13 patients. The clinical results, complications, and postoperative function were compared between only arterial reconstruction group and arteriovenous reconstruction group.

RESULTS

Limb salvage was achieved in 92% of all cases. No local recurrence has been observed. Nineteen patients (76%) are continuously free of disease. Histopathologic examination of the specimens showed that blood vessels had been infiltrated in 24%. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 70%. There were no significant differences in complication rate and postoperative function between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide resection with vascular reconstruction for patients of soft tissue sarcomas involving major vessels in the lower limb provide long term local control and limb salvage. This study could not indicate the usefulness of additional venous reconstruction after vascular resection in the lower extremity.

Spot Scanning Proton Therapy in the Curative Treatment of Adult Patients With Sarcoma: The Paul Scherrer Institute Experience

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of spot scanning proton beam therapy (PT) in the curative treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 13 STS patients treated with PT between July 1998 and May 2005 in our institutional database. Tumor histology varied with the most common histologic subtypes including liposarcoma and peripheral nerve sheet tumor. All tumors were located in vicinity of critical structures, such as the spinal cord, optic apparatus, bowel, kidney, or bowel. Of the patients, 6 and 5 patients received PT either as adjuvant therapy for non-R0 resection or for recurrence, respectively. Two patients received radical PT for unresectable disease. The median prescribed dose was 69.4 CGE (CGE = proton Gy x 1.1)-Gy (range, 50.4-76.0) at 1.8 to 2 CGE-Gy (median, 1.9) per fraction. Pre-PT anthracycline-based chemotherapy was delivered to 3 patients only. No patient has been lost to follow-up (median 48.1 months, range, 19.1-100.7 months).

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients, all but 2 patients were alive. Local recurrence developed in 3 (23%) patients. The administered dose to these patients was < or =60 Gy-CGE. Distant control was achieved in all but 2 patients (lung metastasis), 1 of whom presented with a concomitant local recurrence. The 4-year local control and metastasis-free survival rates were 74.1% and 84.6%, respectively. Late grade > or =2 toxicity was observed in only 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Spot scanning PT is an effective and safe treatment for patient with STS in critical locations. The observed toxicity rate was acceptable.

Local Management of Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors classified into multiple histological subtypes and categorized into four sites: extremity and trunk, head and neck, retroperitoneal, and visceral, the latter now predominantly consisting of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Well-planned, complete surgical resection is the mainstay of curative therapy for tumors at each of these sites. The success of surgery alone in controlling disease varies with the site, histologic grade, depth, and size of the tumor. For high-risk tumors, adjuvant therapy should be considered. In high-risk extremity tumors, adjuvant radiation has been proven in randomized trials to improve local control. Limb-sparing surgery combined with adjuvant radiation achieves equivalent local control to amputation, with the same distant relapse-free survival. Due to anatomical constraints, tumors of the head and neck and retroperitoneum are typically excised with close margins, providing a rationale for adjuvant radiation; the available evidence suggests but does not prove a benefit. Large-scale trials of adjuvant imatinib for gastrointestinal stromal tumors are currently being conducted. For tumors of the extremity/trunk, head and neck, and retroperitoneum, biopsy prior to definitive resection is recommended to establish the diagnosis and permit intelligent treatment planning with appropriate choice and sequencing of adjuvant therapies. This planning is most expeditiously done through multidisciplinary consultation at an experienced sarcoma center.

Interlocking telescopic rod for patients with osteogenesis imperfecta

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary fixation with use of a telescopic rod with a T-piece is one of the standard methods for long-bone stabilization in growing children with osteogenesis imperfecta. However, installation and removal of this device can cause substantial damage to the distal joint, which limits its use, especially in the tibia. We devised a modification of the telescopic rod system--the interlocking telescopic rod--in which the obturator is a simple rod with a hole, instead of a T-piece, at its distal end.

METHODS

The clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated more than two years following treatment of thirty-two limb segments (twenty-three tibiae and nine femora) with this new rod system in fifteen patients with osteogenesis imperfecta.

RESULTS

All rods were inserted without an arthrotomy of the distal joint, and all telescoped successfully. The interlocking pin used in the first five limb segments backed out between five and thirty-three months postoperatively. A revised fixation technique was used in the remaining twenty-seven limb segments, and the interlocking pin had not backed out at an average 3.1 years postoperatively. Proximal migration of the obturator was observed in four tibiae after 2.5 years. The cumulative survival rate of the rod at four years postoperatively was 88.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Both insertion and removal of an interlocking telescopic rod are much less invasive than insertion and removal of a conventional telescopic rod with a T-piece anchor. The interlocking pin at the distal epiphysis provides effective anchorage for telescoping. Our interim results showed survival of the device to be comparable with, or better than, that of the conventional telescopic rod.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Preoperative and Postoperative Imaging for Staging

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) management requires accurate tumor imaging for staging, treatment planning, and clinical follow-up. Careful preoperative planning may prevent poor primary resections that place the patient at risk for more operations, local recurrence, and worse survival. Although MRI may be preferred for extremity STS, contrast-enhanced CT is an excellent alternative, with no decrease in ability to plan the operative strategy for limb-sparing resection. In retroperitoneal and other intra-abdominal STS, double (oral/intravenous) contrast-enhanced CT evaluates for liver metastases, defines surrounding vital structures that might be resected en bloc, identifies margins at risk for local recurrence, and shows surrounding organs at risk for toxicity during radiation therapy. Postoperative clinical follow-up and imaging must continue even beyond 5 years because of the continued risk of long-term relapse.

Periosteal margin in soft-tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Soft-tissue sarcomas frequently rest in contact with bone. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the risk of local recurrence for sarcomas adjacent to bone and to determine whether the periosteum provides an adequate margin of resection.

METHODS

Fifty patients with soft-tissue sarcomas abutting bone were treated at a single institution between 1990 and 2004. All patients had high-grade, T2 (>5 cm), nonmetastatic disease in the lower extremity. Bone contact was verified by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) scans. Forty-three of 50 patients received preoperative radiation with a mean dose of 50 Gy. In 11 cases a composite resection of bone and soft tissue was performed. In 39 cases the excision involved only soft tissue.

RESULTS

True bone invasion was verified by histopathologic examination in 3 of 50 cases (6%). Local recurrence in the soft tissues developed in 8 of 50 (16%) patients. In no case did the recurrence involve destruction of cortical bone or erosion into bone. The recurrent tumor resided against the region of previous bone contact in 1 of 8 cases. There was no statistically significant difference in local recurrence between patients who had composite bone resection and patients who had soft-tissue resection only (P = .87).

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively few sarcomas are able to penetrate cortical bone. Composite bone and soft-tissue resections are indicated primarily for frank bone invasion. In the absence of this, the periosteum is an adequate surgical margin for sarcomas treated with wide excision and radiation.