Teaching medical ethics to orthopaedic surgery residents

Ethical Practice for Postgraduate Students in Orthopedics: Nurturing Professionalism and Patient Care

Background

In the domain of orthopedics, ethical practice significantly influences professionalism and the quality of patient care delivered by postgraduate students. This narrative review aimed to investigate the implementation and impact of an ethics-centric curriculum tailored for orthopedic postgraduate students.

Methods

The proposed curriculum incorporates methodologies such as case-based learning, interactive discussions, and dedicated mentoring sessions, focusing on the unique ethical challenges encountered in orthopedics.

Results

Introducing the curriculum provided postgraduate students with a robust foundation in ethical principles, enhancing effective communication, and fostering better doctor-patient relationships. Consequently, the students displayed an increased aptitude in navigating intricate ethical dilemmas in their clinical practice.

Conclusion

There is a crucial need for continuous ethics education in orthopedics. Creating a supportive learning environment is essential to cultivate professionalism and promote patient-centered care. This study underscores the transformative potential of ethics training in molding orthopedic professionals who are both competent and deeply committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards.

Teaching Professionalism in Postgraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

This systematic review sought to summarize published professionalism curricula in postgraduate medical education (PGME) and identify best practices for teaching professionalism.

METHOD

Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC) were searched for articles published from 1980 through September 7, 2017. English-language articles were included if they (1) described an educational intervention addressing professionalism, (2) included postgraduate medical trainees, and (3) evaluated professionalism outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 3,383 articles identified, 50 were included in the review. The majority evaluated pre- and posttests for a single group (24, 48%). Three (6%) were randomized controlled trials. The most common teaching modality was small-group discussions (28, 56%); other methods included didactics, reflection, and simulations. Half (25, 50%) used multiple modalities. The professionalism topics most commonly addressed were professional values/behavior (42, 84%) and physician well-being (23, 46%). Most studies measured self-reported outcomes (attitude and behavior change) (27, 54%). Eight (16%) evaluated observed behavior and 3 (6%) evaluated patient outcomes. Of 35 studies that evaluated statistical significance, 20 (57%) reported statistically significant positive effects. Interventions targeting improvements in knowledge were most often effective (8/12, 67%). Curriculum duration was not associated with effectiveness. The 45 quantitative studies were of moderate quality (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument mean score = 10.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Many published curricula addressing professionalism in PGME are effective. Significant heterogeneity in curricular design and outcomes assessed made it difficult to synthesize results to identify best practices. Future work should build upon these curricula to improve the quality and validity of professionalism teaching tools.

Teaching Medical Ethics in Graduate and Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

One objective was to identify and review studies on teaching medical ethics to psychiatry residents. In order to gain insights from other disciplines that have published research in this area, a second objective was to identify and review studies on teaching medical ethics to residents across all other specialties of training and on teaching medical students.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for controlled trials on teaching medical ethics with quantitative outcomes. Search terms included ethics, bioethics, medical ethics, medical students, residents/registrars, teaching, education, outcomes, and controlled trials.

RESULTS

Nine studies were found that met inclusion criteria, including five randomized controlled trails and four controlled non-randomized trials. Subjects included medical students (5 studies), surgical residents (2 studies), internal medicine house officers (1 study), and family medicine preceptors and their medical students (1 study). Teaching methods, course content, and outcome measures varied considerably across studies. Common methodological issues included a lack of concealment of allocation, a lack of blinding, and generally low numbers of subjects as learners. One randomized controlled trial which taught surgical residents using a standardized patient was judged to be especially methodologically rigorous.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the trials incorporated psychiatry residents. Ethics educators should undertake additional rigorously controlled trials in order to secure a strong evidence base for the design of medical ethics curricula. Psychiatry ethics educators can also benefit from the findings of trials in other disciplines and in undergraduate medical education.

Ethics skills laboratory experience for surgery interns

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Ethics curricula are nearly universal in residency training programs, but the content and delivery methods are not well described, and there is still a relative paucity of literature evaluating the effect of ethics curricula. Several commentators have called for more ethics curriculum development at the postgraduate level, and specifically in surgery training. We detail our development and implementation of a clinical ethics curriculum for surgery interns.

METHODS

We developed curricula and simulated patient cases for 2 core clinical ethics skills--breaking bad news and obtaining informed consent. Educational sessions for each topic included (1) framework development (discussion of interns' current experience, development of a consensus framework for ethical practice, and comparison with established frameworks) and (2) practice with simulated patient followed by peer and faculty feedback. At the beginning and end of each session, we administered a test of confidence and knowledge about the topics to assess the effect of the sessions.

RESULTS

A total of 98 surgical interns participated in the ethics skills laboratory from Spring 2008 to Spring 2011. We identified significant improvement in confidence regarding the appropriate content of informed consent (<0.001) and capacity to break bad news (<0.001). We also identified significant improvement in overall knowledge regarding informed consent (<0.01), capacity assessment (<0.05), and breaking bad news (0.001). Regarding specific components of informed consent, capacity assessment, and breaking bad news, significant improvement was shown in some areas, while we failed to improve knowledge in others.

CONCLUSIONS

Through faculty-facilitated small group discussion, surgery interns were able to develop frameworks for ethical practice that paralleled established frameworks. Skills-based training in clinical ethics resulted in an increase in knowledge scores and self-reported confidence. Evaluation of 4 annual cohorts of surgery interns demonstrates significant successes and some areas for improvement in this educational intervention.

Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: endoscopic visualization of its avascular burden

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraosseous use of a flexible endoscope during core decompression in identifying avascular bone in the femoral head that did not meet magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic criteria for osteonecrosis. The flexible endoscope was used to visually examine and locate avascular bone in the entire core track. A high-speed burr was then used to debride the avascular bone. This debridement process was continued until a host bed of porous bleeding cancellous bone was observed, comprising thorough debridement of the femoral head. Autologous cancellous bone graft was then packed into the residual cavity and stabilized. Ten patients (13 hips total) with an average age of 49 years (range, 34-58 years) were included in the study. Eight patients were fully ambulatory at 3 weeks (range, 1-3 weeks). For all 13 hips, the mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 43 (range, 30-75) and improved to a mean of 93 (range, 60-100) postoperatively. Eighty-five percent of patients (11 of 13 hips) demonstrated a good to excellent outcome at a minimum 2-year follow-up (range, 27-45 months). Flexible intraosseous endoscopy helped identify avascular bone that did not appear on the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, safely widen the surgical margins of the core decompression track, and achieve thorough debridement of the femoral head using a minimally invasive technique.

Development of a Test of Residents' Ethics Knowledge for Pediatrics (TREK-P)

BACKGROUND

Professionalism is one of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's core competencies. Residency programs must teach residents about ethical principles, which is an essential component of professionalism.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to formally develop a valid and reliable test of ethics knowledge that effectively discriminated among learners in pediatric residency training and to improve methods for measuring outcomes of resident education in medical ethics.

METHODS

We created an instrument with 36 true/false questions that tested knowledge in several domains of pediatric ethics: professionalism, adolescent medicine, genetic testing and diagnosis, neonatology, end-of-life decisions, and decision making for minors. All questions and their correct answers were derived from published statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. We invited a range of participants from novices to experts to complete the test. We evaluated the instrument's reliability and explored item discrimination, omitting 13 items with the least discriminatory power. Score differences between the 3 categories of examinees were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 23-item test, completed by 54 participants, demonstrated good internal reliability (Kuder-Richardson 20 statistic  =  0.73). The test was moderately difficult and had a mean overall score of 17.3 (±3.3 standard deviation). Performance appropriately improved with degree of expertise: median scores for medical students, postgraduate year-3 residents, and ethicists were 15 (65%, range, 11-19), 19 (83%, range, 14-23), and 22 (96%, range, 20-23), respectively. Ethicists' scores were significantly higher than those of medical students (P < .001) and residents (P  =  .007). Moreover, residents performed significantly better than medical students (P  =  .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a standardized instrument, entitled Test of Residents' Ethics Knowledge for Pediatrics (TREK-P), to evaluate residents' knowledge of pediatric ethics. The TREK-P is easy to administer, reliably discriminates among learners, and highlights content areas in which knowledge may be deficient.

Ethics education in surgical residency programs: a review of the literature

Although ethics education in undergraduate medical school curricula has become essentially universal, and because ethics and professionalism have become integral parts of competency-based curricula for residents in nearly all specialties of medicine and surgery, it is not clear to what extent postgraduate surgical training routinely includes ethics education or skills training. Most general surgery residencies do not routinely integrate in-depth ethics skills training and assessment into their didactic curricula. In this article, we review the literature concerning ethics education in postgraduate surgical training programs. The few studies in the literature suggest that ethics education, when integrated in surgical residency curricula, can lead to measurable improvements in resident-centered outcomes, which include knowledge and confidence in handling ethical dilemmas. These curricula may lead to improvements in patient care. These findings suggest that ethics education for surgical residents is valuable but that questions regarding the optimal "dose" of ethics education and training as well as the optimal teaching methods would benefit from extended systematic evaluation and inquiry.

Training pediatric house staff in evidence-based ethics: an exploratory controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an educational intervention in evidence-based ethics (emphasizing clinical knowledge, epidemiologic skills, and recognition of ethical issues) administered to house staff before rotating through our neonatal intensive care unit.

STUDY DESIGN

A controlled trial of 64 pediatric house staff assigned to alternating control and intervention rotations. Questionnaires were administered at the end of the rotation.

RESULTS

Some benefits of the intervention were observed. However, a large percentage of intervention and control house staff substantially overestimated (>1.25 correct value) predischarge mortality (23% vs. 55% of house staff; p<0.02), mortality or major morbidity (74% vs. 46% of house staff; p=0.04), and cerebral palsy rates (70% vs. 87%; p=0.12). Neither group cited many methodological criteria for evaluating follow-up studies (3.3 vs. 2.4 criteria; p=0.05) or ethical issues considered in treatment recommendations for extremely premature infants (3.1 vs. 2.8 issues; p=0.35).

CONCLUSION

Improved house staff training in evidence-based ethics is needed.