The functional outcome of operative treatment of ununited fractures of the humeral diaphysis in older patients

Outcomes of Humerus Nonunion Surgery in Patients With Initial Operative Fracture Fixation

OBJECTIVES

To describe outcomes following humerus aseptic nonunion surgery in patients whose initial fracture was treated operatively and to identify risk factors for nonunion surgery failure in the same population.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Eight, academic, level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with aseptic humerus nonunion (OTA/AO 11 and 12) after the initial operative management between 1998 and 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Success rate of nonunion surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included (56% female; median age 50 years; mean follow-up 21.2 months). Of 90 aseptic humerus nonunions, 71 (78.9%) united following nonunion surgery. Thirty patients (33.3%) experienced 1 or more postoperative complications, including infection, failure of fixation, and readmission. Multivariate analysis found that not performing revision internal fixation during nonunion surgery (n = 8; P = 0.002) and postoperative de novo infection (n = 9; P = 0.005) were associated with an increased risk of recalcitrant nonunion. Patient smoking status and the use of bone graft were not associated with differences in the nonunion repair success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This series of previously operated aseptic humerus nonunions found that more than 1 in 5 patients failed nonunion repair. De novo postoperative infection and failure to perform revision internal fixation during nonunion surgery were associated with recalcitrant nonunion. Smoking and use of bone graft did not influence the success rate of nonunion surgery. These findings can be used to give patients a realistic expectation of results and complications following humerus nonunion surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What treatment for humeral shaft non-union? Case-series assessment of a strategy

INTRODUCTION

Humeral shaft non-union is frequent, with severe clinical impact. Management, however, is poorly codified and there is no clear decision-tree.

HYPOTHESIS

Analyzing our experience over the last 15years could enable a reproducible strategy to be drawn up, with a decision-tree based on the 2 main causes: failure of internal fixation, and infection.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Sixty-one patients were included in a retrospective cohort, with a mean 94 months' follow-p. The treatment strategy was based on screening first for infection then for mechanical stability deficit in case of prior internal fixation. Any fixation revision was associated to cancellous autograft. In case of suspected or proven infection, 2-stage treatment was implemented. In case of primary non-operative treatment, the strategy was based on the non-union risk on the Non-Union Scoring System (NUSS), with internal fixation and possible graft.

RESULTS

There were 6 failures, for a consolidation rate of 90%; excluding patients not managed according to the study protocol, the consolidation rate was 95%. There was 1 case of spontaneously resolving postoperative radial palsy, and 3 patients required surgical revision.

DISCUSSION

The present strategy achieved consolidation in most cases, providing the surgeon with a decision-tree for these patients. Infectious etiologies are often overlooked and should be a focus of screening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective or historical series.

Postoperative radial nerve palsy in humeral shaft nonunion reconstruction: Can the lateral paratricipital approach prevent this common complication?

BACKGROUND

Postoperative radial nerve palsy (RNP) is a well-known complication of nonunion reconstruction of the humerus. The purpose of the current study is to determine if the surgical approach for nonunion reconstruction of the humerus influences the rate of postoperative radial nerve palsy.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of all humeral shaft and extraarticular distal humerus nonunion reconstructions performed between January 1, 2004, and August 31, 2021, was conducted. Patients included were over 18 years of age, had a non-pathologic humerus fracture nonunion and had intact radial nerve function prior to nonunion reconstruction. Exclusion criteria consisted of nonunions involving the proximal humerus, intraarticular fractures, and reconstructive treatment procedures with either intramedullary nail or external fixation methods. Perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed in regard to the development of postoperative RNP. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the interaction of significant variables on the development of postoperative RNP.

RESULTS

The overall rate of postoperative RNP in this series was 6/53 (11%). However, no cases of postoperative radial nerve palsy were observed in patients who underwent nonunion reconstruction with a lateral paratricipital approach. A new RNP was seen in 4/9 (44%) of those patients who underwent a triceps splitting approach, which was significantly higher than those utilizing either an anterolateral approach (2/28, 7%) or a lateral paratricipital approach (0/16, 0%, p = 0.007).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that the lateral paratricipital exposure decreases the risk of radial nerve injury with nonunion reconstruction of the humerus. The lateral paratricipital exposure offers the benefit of radial nerve exploration, decompression, neurolysis and protection prior to fracture manipulation and instrumentation. This study shows conventional approaches may predispose patients to a high rate of postoperative RNP, similar to that in the literature.

Management of humeral nonunions following failed surgical fixation

INTRODUCTION

Management of humerus nonunions with previously failed fixation presents a complex problem. There are multiple revision fixation strategies, of which compression plating is a mainstay. The aim of this study was to assess the results of open reduction and direct compression plating without the need for autograft or allograft in the setting of revision humerus open reduction internal fixation.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of 19 patients treated between 2008 and 2017 for humerus nonunions following failed fixation who were treated by a single surgeon using direct compression plating with bone graft substitutes. Patients were treated with neurolysis of the radial nerve, hardware removal, debridement of the nonunion site with shortening osteotomies, compression plating, and augmentation with bone graft substitutes. All patients were followed until radiographic and clinical union.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were identified for the study and 17 had adequate follow-up for final analysis. Humeral union was achieved in 16/17 (94.1%) patients with a mean time to union of 23 weeks. Two patients required a repeat compression plating with bone graft substitute to achieve union. The one patient with a nonunion radiographically reported minimal clinical symptoms and opted for no revision surgery. An association with the index procedure was seen, as three out of four of the patients who experienced radial nerve palsies after their index procedure subsequently experienced a radial nerve palsy after the procedure to repair their nonunion. All patient's all experienced a return of function in their radial nerve either back to baseline or improved from before the revision nonunion surgery.

CONCLUSION

The use of humeral shortening osteotomy and compression plating without autograft or allograft is a viable option for management of humeral nonunions which avoids the morbidity associated with autograft harvest. The patients with radial nerve palsy after the index procedure are likely to have a transient radial nerve palsy as well after the revision surgery necessitating proper informed consent prior to the operation.

Approach to Humeral Shaft Nonunion: Evaluation and Surgical Techniques

Humeral shaft fractures account for 1% to 3% of all fractures. Traditional nonsurgical treatment with a functional brace is still the standard treatment of these fractures; however, modern studies have reported that nonunion rates may be as high as 33%. Recent information suggests that the development of nonunion after nonsurgical treatment may be identified as early as 6 to 8 weeks postinjury. Even with surgical treatment, nonunion rates as high as 10% have been reported. Regardless of the original treatment method, nonunion results in poor quality of life for the patient and therefore should be addressed. A thorough preoperative evaluation is important to identify any metabolic or infectious factors that may contribute to the nonunion. In most cases, surgical intervention should consist of compression plating with or without bone graft. Although most patients will achieve union with standard surgical intervention, some patients may require specialized techniques such as cortical struts or vascularized fibular grafts. Successful treatment of humeral shaft nonunion improves function, reduces disability, and improves the quality of life for patients. In this article, we outline our approach to the treatment of humeral shaft nonunion in a variety of clinical settings.

COMPARISON OF SINGLE- AND DOUBLE-PLATE FIXATION TECHNIQUES IN THE TREATMENT OF NONUNIONS OF THE HUMERAL SHAFT

Introduction

Humerus shaft fractures may be treated conservatively or surgically. In 2.5% to 13% of cases, nonunion is observed, and it leads to severe pain and morbidity. Plate osteosynthesis has become popular in the treatment of nonunion of the humeral shaft. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of patients with humerus shaft nonunion whom we treated with single- or double-plate fixation.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-three patients diagnosed with aseptic humeral shaft nonunion and treated with plate fixation were included in the study. Patients were evaluated according to the number of plates (single vs. double plates). The two groups were subjected to statistical evaluation according to their clinical and radiographical results.

Results

The average age of the patients was 53 years (range: 1-86); 28 (52.8%) were female and 25 (47.2%) were male. The union rate was 90.32% for single plate and 90.91% for double plate fixation. There was no statistically significant difference between single and double plates in the clinical and radiographical results (union time, union rate, Q-DASH score) (p > 0.05). There was a significant correlation between age and union times / Q-DASH scores according to the Spearman correlation test (p < 0.05). Transient radial nerve neuropraxia developed in 2 patients and 1 patient suffered from an infection that was treated with debridement and antibiotic therapy.

Conclusion

In our study, similar good results were obtained with single and double plates. In treatment of humeral shaft nonunions, a second plate is not needed if enough stability is provided with single plate fixation. Level of evidence III, Retrospective comparative study.

Surgical management of humeral shaft nonunions. Success of a consistent protocol over 17 years

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment of humeral shaft nonunions is characterized by variability of fixation methods, graft choices, and rates of union and iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the union rate of humeral shaft aseptic nonunions and the rate of postoperative complications following a consistent management protocol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 41 consecutive adult patients (23 female and 18 male with a mean age of 42 years) with aseptic nonunions of the humeral shaft treated by the senior author in our institution over a 17-year period. Nonunions were located in the middle third of the diaphysis in 33 patients, in the distal third in 6, and in the proximal third in 2 patients. Comorbidities were present in 49% of patients and the most common were smoking in 27% and diabetes mellitus in 17% of patients. Patients were treated at an average of 24 months after their injury. Surgical protocol consisted of careful dissection of the radial nerve, debridement of the nonunion site, stable plate fixation and augmentation of local biology.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients had mean clinical and radiographic follow-up of 9.4 months. All 38 nonunions healed at a mean time of 3.5 months. There were no persistent nonunions and no failures of fixation. None of the 40 patients with an intact radial nerve preoperatively developed any signs of radial nerve compromise after surgery. Complications consisted of one superficial infection (2%) that resolved with oral antibiotics and one deep infection (2%) that required implant removal and debridement. The mean pain score on the visual analog scale was 0.7. Mean elbow range of motion was 125 degrees with a mean extension deficit of 5 degrees and mean flexion of 130 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Our surgical protocol achieved consistent healing of nonunions of the humeral shaft with a low complication rate and no iatrogenic radial nerve palsy, even in long-standing nonunions in patients with comorbidities.

Factors associated with humeral shaft nonunion

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to identify patient and injury factors independently associated with humeral diaphyseal fracture nonunion after nonoperative management. The secondary aim was to determine the effect of management (operative/nonoperative) on nonunion.

METHODS

From 2008-2017, a total of 734 humeral shaft fractures (732 consecutive skeletally mature patients) were retrospectively identified from a trauma database. Follow-up was available for 663 fractures (662 patients, 90%) that formed the study cohort. Patient and injury characteristics were recorded. There were 523 patients (79%) managed nonoperatively and 139 (21%) managed operatively. Outcome (union/nonunion) was determined from medical records and radiographs.

RESULTS

The median age at injury was 57 (range 16-96) years and 54% (n = 359/662) were female. Median follow-up was 5 (1.2-74) months. Nonunion occurred in 22.7% (n = 119/524) of nonoperatively managed injuries. Multivariate analysis demonstrated preinjury nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; odds ratio [OR] 20.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-199.48; P = .009) and glenohumeral arthritis (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.03-5.77; P = .043) were independently associated with an increased risk of nonunion. Operative fixation was independently associated with a lower risk of nonunion (2.9%, n = 4/139) compared with nonoperative management (OR for nonoperative/operative management 9.91, 95% CI 3.25-30.23; P < .001). Based on these findings, 5 patients would need to undergo primary operative fixation in order to avoid 1 nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Preinjury NSAIDs and glenohumeral arthritis were independently associated with nonunion following nonoperative management of a humeral diaphyseal fracture. Operative fixation was the independent factor most strongly associated with a lower risk of nonunion. Targeting early operative fixation to at-risk patients may reduce the rate of nonunion and the morbidity associated with delayed definitive management.

Humeral Shaft Fracture Healing Rates in Older Patients

Nonoperative treatment has become the standard of care for the majority of humeral shaft fractures. Published studies have mainly come from trauma centers with a young cohort of patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the nonunion rate of humeral shaft fractures in patients older than 55 years. A retrospective study was performed on a group of orthopedic trauma group treated at a level I trauma center during a 10-year period (2007-2017). Patients 55 years or older and treated for a humeral shaft fracture nonoperatively, with or without manipulation, were identified. Nonunion was defined by no bridging callus radiographically or by gross motion at the fracture at least 12 weeks from injury. There were 31 patients identified with humeral shaft fractures who met the inclusion criteria. The cohort included 21 (67.7%) females and 10 (32.3%) males with a mean age of 72.5 years (range, 55-92 years). Twenty-one fractures went on to union, and there were 10 nonunions, with no significant differences in the demographics or comorbidities. There was no correlation between AO/OTA fracture classification or fracture location and union status. There was a tendency toward higher risk of nonunion in proximal third humeral shaft fractures (45%) compared with middle (26%) and distal third (20%) humeral shaft fractures, although this was not statistically significant. The overall nonunion rate for humeral shaft fractures was 32% for patients older than 55 years. The authors found a significant correlation between age and union rate: as age increased, union rate decreased (R=-0.9, P=.045). The incidence of humeral shaft nonunion in patients older than 55 years was significantly higher than that of younger adults. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to report a significant correlation between nonunion and increased age. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(3);168-172.].

Humeral Diaphyseal Fracture Nonunion: An Audit of the Outcome from Intramedullary Nailing and DCP Plating

Purpose

This study aims to compare the functional outcomes of nonunion humeral diaphyseal fractures following conservative treatment when managed surgically with either a plate or intramedullary (IM) nail fixation.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 56 patients with nonunion humeral fractures following conservative treatment who underwent plate or IM nail fixation between 2007 and 2014. Comparison was made for short term profile (intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, and length of hospitalization) and long term clinical outcome with functional score (Constant-Murley score (CMS)) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score). The union and complication rate were also compared.

Results

There were 36 and 20 patients included in plate and IM nail fixation group with the average of 36.14 ± 7.54-month follow-up time. The intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, and length of hospitalization were superior in IM nail group compared to plate group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean CMS and DASH score were superior in the plate group compared to the IM nail group (82.40 ± 16.84 versus 77.58 ± 12.96; 17.46 ± 11.05 versus 20.86 ± 11.63, respectively; with p = 0.246, p = 0.299, respectively). Plate fixation group showed higher union rate and complication rate compared to IM nail group (100% versus 90%, 13.8% versus 10%, respectively).

Conclusions

IM nail and plate fixation demonstrated comparable clinical outcome. IM nail fixation showed superior short term result with lower complication rate which benefits the elderly group patients with significant comorbidities.

Humeral shaft non-union in the elderly: Results with cortical graft plus stem cells

INTRODUCTION

Humeral shaft is a common site of fracture non-union. Biology and bone quality represent some of the problems that the orthopaedic surgeon has to face up in the elderly. The goals of treatment of humeral shaft non-union are the achievement of mechanical stability and creation of a favourable biologic environment. Bone graft and stem cells are some of the augmentation techniques available to reach these goals.

PURPOSE

Evaluation of the outcomes of humeral shaft non-union in elderly population treated with cortical allograft and stem cells.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cohort of 21 patients with humeral shaft non-union was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients aged more than 65 years, with a diagnosis of humeral shaft non-union treated with cortical allograft and stem cells. Primary endpoints were 'bone healing' and 'time-to-union'. Secondary endpoints were shoulder and elbow function and patients' quality of life with Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant score and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D).

RESULTS

6 patients met the inclusion criteria. In 5 of them, the cortical allograft was opposite to a plate, whereas in the other one a "Sandwich" technique was chosen because of large osteolysis. 'Bone healing' occurred in all patients after a mean of 3.3 months (range 2-5). In all but two patients, the elbow range of motion was in almost normal range (15-130). The mean OSS was 35.8 (+/- 6.4), whereas the mean Constant was 53.3 (+/- 2.2). The mean EQ-5D index was 0.451 (+/- 0.21).

DISCUSSION

Bone healing occurred in all patients, with a time-to-union comparable or even better compared with other series. The use of cortical bone graft provide both stability and biological benefit, whereas stem cells improve the non-union environmental biology. Functional outcomes were lower than other series and patients' quality of life was similar to Italian elderly women.

CONCLUSION

The use cortical allograft with stem cells is a viable strategy to treat humeral shaft non-union in the elderly.

Comparative analysis of functional outcome of anatomical precontoured locking plate versus reconstruction plate in the management of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures

INTRODUCTION

For the fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures, different plates are available, each with its specific pros and cons. The ideal plating choice remains subject to ongoing discussion. Reconstruction plates are cheap and easily bendable, but their strength and stability have been questioned. The anatomical precontoured locking plates provide better stability and strength compared with the reconstruction plate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have analyzed both prospectively and retrospectively 55 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated surgically using precontoured anatomical locking plate (24 cases) or reconstruction plate (31 cases) for patients admitted in our institute between January 2011 and December 2017. The clinical and radiological outcomes between the reconstruction plate and precontoured anatomical locking plate were compared using Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and plain radiographs, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean time to union was 16.3 weeks in the reconstruction plate group compared with 13.4 weeks in the precontoured locking plate group. The mean score in Quick DASH was 32.65 in the reconstruction group and 25.44 points in the precontoured locking plate group. We had complications such as hypertrophic scar, painful shoulder, and restricted range of motion in both the groups, whereas screw cutout and plate failure were noted only in the reconstruction plate group, which needed implant removal. The mean follow-up period was 16.44 months (14-31 months). The removal of implant was carried out in three patients in the reconstruction group. None of the group had nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Surgical management of fresh middle third clavicle fractures with anatomical precontoured locking plate provided stable fixation, faster union, and better functional outcome compared with the reconstruction plating. Anatomical plate had the advantage of less soft tissue stripping, and there is less need for lag screw fixation of the plate for fracture stability as precontoured plate itself provides a rigid construct.

Biomechanical Analysis Using FEA and Experiments of Metal Plate and Bone Strut Repair of a Femur Midshaft Segmental Defect

This investigation assessed the biomechanical performance of the metal plate and bone strut technique for fixing recalcitrant nonunions of femur midshaft segmental defects, which has not been systematically done before. A finite element (FE) model was developed and then validated by experiments with the femur in 15 deg of adduction at a subclinical hip force of 1 kN. Then, FE analysis was done with the femur in 15 deg of adduction at a hip force of 3 kN representing about 4 x body weight for a 75 kg person to examine clinically relevant cases, such as an intact femur plus 8 different combinations of a lateral metal plate of fixed length, a medial bone strut of varying length, and varying numbers and locations of screws to secure the plate and strut around a midshaft defect. Using the traditional “high stiffness” femur-implant construct criterion, the repair technique using both a lateral plate and a medial strut fixed with the maximum possible number of screws would be the most desirable since it had the highest stiffness (1948 N/mm); moreover, this produced a peak femur cortical Von Mises stress (92 MPa) which was below the ultimate tensile strength of cortical bone. Conversely, using the more modern “low stiffness” femur-implant construct criterion, the repair technique using only a lateral plate but no medial strut provided the lowest stiffness (606 N/mm), which could potentially permit more in-line interfragmentary motion (i.e., perpendicular to the fracture gap, but in the direction of the femur shaft long axis) to enhance callus formation for secondary-type fracture healing; however, this also generated a peak femur cortical Von Mises stress (171 MPa) which was above the ultimate tensile strength of cortical bone.

Why a surgically treated humeral shaft fracture became a nonunion: review of 11 years in two trauma centers

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate nonunion causes of surgically treated humeral shaft fractures in two different trauma centers.

METHODS

A total of 327 cases of humeral shaft fractures were treated in 11 years in two trauma centers. We retrospectively reviewed in detail some factors in order to understand the reasons for nonunion: (1) fracture type, according to the AO classification, (2) grade of open fracture, according to Gustilo-Anderson, (3) timing, (4) reduction and (5) fixation.

RESULTS

We observed 19 nonunions, 10 women and 9 men, with an average age of 57 years. Fractures were 1 A1 case, 2 A2 cases, 4 B2 cases, 6 B3 cases, 2 C1 cases, 1 C2 case and 3 C3 cases. Three cases had a simple fracture with two fragments; all the other were comminuted. Fifteen cases were closed, four open. The major criticalities observed were fracture comminution, exposure, unstable fixation and bone resorption. All 19 patients with nonunion underwent surgical fixation with compression plate and frozen cortical bone graft. A 4.5 LCP plate was used in 17 cases. The remaining 2 cases had an anatomical site-specific proximal humeral 3.5-mm LCP plate (Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA). In 17 patients, the nonunion healed: 15 cases treated with a 4.5 straight plate, and 2 cases with an anatomical site-specific proximal humeral 3.5 mm LCP plate, at a mean of 5 months. In 2 cases, consolidation was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that humeral diaphyseal fractures should be treated surgically to avoid many complications. Our retrospective analysis indicates that factors that lead to a fixation failure are fracture comminution, open fracture, unstable fixation. The 19 nonunions treated with compression plating and frozen bone graft demonstrated consolidation in almost 90% of the cases.

Recalcitrant aseptic atrophic non-union of the shaft of the humerus after failure of surgical treatment: management by excision of non-union, bone grafting and stabilization by LCP in different modes

Non-union of the humeral shaft is infrequently noticed after surgical fixation. Sixty eight patients whose osteosynthesis of humeral shaft had failed leading to non-union were identified over a duration of 10 years from (January 2006 to December 2015). Clinical and radiographical follow-up was available for 64 patients (4 patients were lost for follow-up), with a mean age of 58 years (range 25-78 years). All patients had aseptic atrophic non-union of either: proximal shaft (n=12), mid shaft (n=38), and lower shaft (n=14). All these patients had failure of primary fixation, with a minimum duration from 36 to 110 weeks. Non-unions were operated by excision of non-union, autogenous bone grafting and osteosynthesis by locking compression plating. Adequate fixation of non-union with bone grafting was achieved in all patients. All non-unions healed well at an average of 16 weeks (range 6-36 weeks). The mean length of follow-up was 120 weeks (range 60-250 weeks). The mean range of movements following healing of non-union was forward flexion of 140°, external rotation and internal rotation of 30° at shoulder and average fixed flexion deformity of 10° and flexion of 130° at elbow. Two patients had postoperative radial nerve palsy because of neuropraxia, which recovered in eight weeks. Three patient developed superficial infections at the iliac crest, which settled with antibiotics, dressings in 3 weeks time and two patients had some discomfort over the fibular graft harvest site. In all patients complete clinical and radiological union was achieved with satisfactory outcome in terms of relief of symptoms and functional improvement in the range of movements. The main points in surgical treatment were complete excision of non-union, correction of deformity, use of plenty of corticocancellous graft, furthermore the use of intramedullary fibula and osteosynthesis by long locking compression plating in different modes of fixation provided good to excellent results and clinical outcome.

Closing the gap: a novel technique for humeral shaft nonunions using cup and cone reamers

INTRODUCTION

Nonunion following closed treatment of humeral shaft fracture is estimated to be 5.5%. Many surgical techniques have been described to address humeral shaft nonunion including: open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF) with compression plating and bone graft, dual plating, cortical strut allograft and autograft, and adding biologic augmentation (BMP). The current standard of care includes ORIF with compression plating and bone grafting, but even this technique has an approximated 10% failure rate. We describe a novel surgical technique using cup and cone reamers, which were originally designed for metatarsophalangeal or metacarpalphalangeal arthrodesis. Cup and cone reamers are the appropriate size for mid-shaft, transverse humeral nonunions to ensure ideal apposition of healthy, bleeding bone.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We retrospectively reviewed 3 patients with nonunion of the midshaft humerus which were treated with the cup and cone technique and a large fragment LCDC plate. An anterolateral approach was used in 2 cases and a posterior in the other. After exposure of fracture ends, 24-mm hemispherical convex and concave reamers were then used to ream the proximal and distal ends in order to create a "cup and cone" articulation of the fracture ends. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months with a mean follow-up of 12 months.

RESULTS

All patients treated with this technique achieved union, reported zero pain and full functional outcome. Specifically, patients had a mean age of 36.3 and the mean interval between injury and time to surgery was 11.5 months. Two of the patients presented with nonunions after attempted closed treatment and the other patient had 3 prior surgeries for infected nonunion. Union was achieved at a mean of 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, the use of cup and cone reamers for nonunion of the humerus has never been described. We describe a simple and effective technique for humeral shaft nonunions which has been successful in both septic and hypertrophic nonunions, as well as from multiple approaches-both anterolateral and posterior.

Dual plating for fixation of humeral shaft fractures: A mechanical comparison of various combinations of plate lengths

Objective

The role of plate configuration was found inconclusive on the biomechanical effects of the plate size and hole number for dual plate constructions in humeral shaft fractures. The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical stability of various dual plate constructions.

Methods

Twenty-four left humeri (4th Generation Composite Humerus, Sawbones, Malmö, Sweden) with comminuted midshaft humeral fracture were used. Four groups of plate constructs were tested: laterally fixed 8-hole locking plate and screws were combined with anteriorly locking plates containing 0, 4, 6, or 8 holes in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The alterations in axial, bending, and torsional angles were recorded.

Results

There were no fixation failures during axial, bending, or torsional stiffness testing within the elastic behavior limits. Axial stiffness was highest in Group IV. Torsional stiffness, posterior-to-anterior bending stiffness, lateral-to-medial bending stiffness, and medial-to-lateral bending stiffness were lowest in Group I.

Conclusion

The similar stiffness values for the 8-to-4 hole and 8-to-6 hole plate constructions indicate that the 8-to-4 hole construction is an option in young adults, while the stiffest 8-to-8 hole combination may be an option for osteoporotic patients.

Step-Cut Osteotomy for Recalcitrant Humeral Shaft Nonunion

The majority of humeral shaft nonunions resolve following operative intervention; however, a small percentage will persist despite surgical efforts. These cases of persistent nonunion are frustrating for patients and challenging for orthopedic surgeons. The authors describe the use of a step-cut osteotomy of the humeral diaphysis coupled with neutralization plating and autologous bone grafting for the management of humeral shaft nonunions that were recalcitrant to initial surgical management. In the authors' experience, this technique has been a valuable adjunct for obtaining adequate reduction and subsequent union in these complex cases. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):e587-e591.].

Outcome of fixation for nonunion of extremities

PURPOSE

To review the outcomes of 102 consecutive patients who underwent fixation for nonunion of extremities.

METHODS

Medical records of 71 men and 31 women aged 16 to 82 (mean, 45; standard deviation [SD], 19) years who underwent fixation for nonunion of the upper (n=31) and lower (n=71) extremities were reviewed. The nonunion types included oligotrophic (n=47), hypertrophic (n=22), atrophic (n=17), defect (n=12), and comminuted (n=4). 13 of the nonunions were infected. 10 patients had concomitant injuries of the brain (n=2), abdomen (n=5), chest (n=1), and spine (n=2). 43 patients were smokers, and 19 had diabetes mellitus. 80 patients had had previous surgery, and 3 had undergone previous radiotherapy. The mean time from injury to nonunion surgery was 19 (SD, 25.6; range, 6-180) months. Outcome measures included bone union, ability to return to original work, pain, gait, and loss of range of motion.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 26.6 (SD, 19.9; range, 8-121) months. 100 patients achieved bone union. 83 of them achieved bone union after a single surgery in a mean of 5.6 (SD, 2.9) months. The remaining 17 patients underwent multiple surgeries, 13 of whom had infected nonunions. Two patients did not achieve bone union. Of 64 patients who had work, 47 returned to their original work and 17 did not. Outcome was unsatisfactory in 5 patients who had persistent pain and/or no improvement in gait.

CONCLUSION

Bone union is not necessarily associated with adequate recovery of function.

Risk factors for fracture mobility six weeks after initiation of brace treatment of mid-diaphyseal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have identified specific subsets of diaphyseal humeral fractures for which functional bracing is less effective. The present study tested the hypothesis that a gap between fracture fragments may be a risk factor (after accounting for other potential risk factors) for fracture instability six weeks after functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified seventy-nine adult patients (forty-six men, thirty-three women; forty-two fractures on the right side, thirty-seven fractures on the left), each with an acute, closed, AO type-A2 (oblique, ≥30°) or type-A3 (transverse, <30°) mid-diaphyseal humeral shaft fracture treated nonoperatively at three different level-I trauma centers from June 2004 to August 2011. The gap between the fracture fragments was measured on the first radiographs made after the affected upper extremity was placed in a brace.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (80%) had documented healing of the fracture. Sixteen patients (20%) had motion at the fracture site and a persistent fracture line shown on radiographs six weeks or more after injury. In multivariable analysis, each millimeter of gap between the main fragments with the patient wearing the brace (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 1.7), smoking (OR = 5.8, 95% CI = 1.4 to 25), and female sex (OR = 5.3, 95% CI = 1.2 to 23) increased the risk of fracture instability six weeks after injury (R2 = 0.38, area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of the gap between the fracture fragments is an independent risk factor for fracture instability and the lack of a bridging callus six weeks after a diaphyseal humeral fracture.

A single-stage treatment protocol for presumptive aseptic diaphyseal nonunions: a review of outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To review the results of a single-stage treatment protocol for presumptive aseptic diaphyseal nonunion with a well-healed wound and no infection history.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all presumptive aseptic diaphyseal nonunions treated by a single-stage protocol. There were 104 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-seven patients were available for follow-up through to complete healing (83.7% follow-up rate).

INTERVENTION

The protocol entails withholding preoperative antibiotics, removing the implant, performing open debridement or canal reaming, taking 5 cultures of the nonunion site or canal reamings, followed by antibiotic administration, and revision open reduction and internal fixation or exchange nailing. If intraoperative cultures are positive, long-term antibiotics are begun specific to organism sensitivities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

To analyze the rate of positive cultures and to compare the rate of secondary surgery to promote healing in positive and negative culture groups.

RESULTS

Intraoperative cultures were positive in 28.7% (25/87) of patients with complete follow-up. The overall rate of secondary surgery for persistence of nonunion was 12.6% (11/87). In patients with positive intraoperative cultures, rate of secondary surgery was 28% (7/25) versus 6.4% (4/62) in the group without positive intraoperative cultures (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A single-stage treatment protocol for presumptive aseptic diaphyseal nonunions was effective in obviating further revision surgery in 93.6% of truly aseptic cases and in 72% of positive culture cases and is still employed at our institution.

Outcome of locking compression plates in humeral shaft nonunions

BACKGROUND

Nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus are frequently seen in clinical practice (incidence of up to 15% in certain studies) and osteosynthesis using dynamic compression plates, intra medullary nails and Ilizarov fixators have been reported previously. Locking compression plates (LCP) are useful in the presence of disuse osteoporosis, segmental bone loss and cortical defects that preclude strong fixation. We report a prospective followup study of the outcome of the use of LCP for humeral nonunion following failed internal fixation in which implants other than LCP had been used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty four patients with nonunion of humeral shaft fractures following failed internal fixation were included in the study. The mean followup period was 3.4 years (range: 2.4 to 5.7 years) and the minimum followup period was 2 years. Mean age of the patients was 41.04 years (range: 24 to 57 years). All 24 patients underwent osteosynthesis using LCP and autologous bone grafting (cortico-cancellous iliac crest graft combined with or without fibular strut graft). Main outcome measurements included radiographic assessment of fracture union and pre and postoperative functional evaluation using the modified Constant and Murley scoring system.

RESULTS

23 out of 24 fractures united following osteosynthesis. Average time to union was 16 weeks (range: 10 to 28 weeks). Complications included delayed union (n = 2), transient radial nerve palsy (n = 2) and persistent nonunion (n = 1). Functional evaluation using the Constant and Murley score showed excellent results in 11, good in 10, fair in two and poor outcome in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Locking compression plating and cancellous bone grafting is a reliable option for achieving union in humeral diaphyseal nonunion with failed previous internal fixation and results in good functional outcome in patients with higher physiological demands.

The anterolateral approach to the proximal humerus for nonunions and delayed unions

Nonunions of proximal humerus fractures can be disabling as a result of pain, deformity and instability, and are often found in geriatric patients with poor bone quality. There are relatively few studies examining the treatment of nonunions of the proximal third of the humerus and the ideal treatment and surgical approach remains unclear. This case series reports the successful use of the anterolateral acromial approach for treatment of the symptomatic proximal third humerus nonunions in a geriatric group of patients with clear challenges as a result of patient comorbidities and bone quality.

Outcomes of nonoperatively treated displaced scapular body fractures

BACKGROUND

Displaced scapular body fractures most commonly are treated conservatively. However there is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the outcomes owing to retrospective design of studies, different classification systems, and diverse outcome tools.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The functional outcome after nonoperative management of displaced scapular body fractures was assessed by change in the DASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score; (2) the radiographic outcome was assessed by the change of the glenopolar angle (GPA); and (3) associated scapular and extrascapular injuries that may affect outcome were identified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine consecutive patients were treated with early passive and active ROM exercises for a displaced scapular body fracture. We followed 32 of these patients (65.3%) for a minimum of 6 months (mean, 15 months; range, 6-33 months). Mean age of the patients was 46.9 years (range, 21-84 years) and the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 21.5 (range, 5-50). Subjective functional results (DASH score) and radiographic assessment (fracture union, glenopolar angle) were measured.

RESULTS

All fractures healed uneventfully. The mean change of glenopolar angle was 9° (range, 0°-20°). The mean change of the DASH score was 10.2, which is a change with minimal clinical importance. There was a correlation between the change in this score with the ISS and presence of rib fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory outcomes are reported with nonoperative treatment of displaced scapular body fractures. We have shown that the severity of ISS and the presence of rib fractures adversely affect the clinical outcome.

Anterior plating as a surgical alternative in the treatment of humeral shaft non-union

This study included 15 patients with humeral shaft fractures who had no clinical, radiological or bone scan signs of healing after eight months. The patients were followed for a mean of 35.8 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. Anterior plating of humeral shaft nonunion via an anterior approach was performed using a straight plate and compression for well-vascularised non-unions and wave plating with a tricortical graft for poorly vascularised non-unions. All non-unions healed within 6-18 weeks (mean, nine weeks) without local complication. One patient had a mild decrease in elbow and shoulder range of motion. No neurovascular injury was observed. Anterior plating is a simple, safe and effective treatment for humeral shaft non-union. As this approach avoids the need for radial nerve visualisation and extensive soft-tissue dissection, and the healing time is similar to that of other methods, we suggest this treatment as an alternative option.

Management of non-union of humeral fractures with the Stryker T2 compression nail

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the humeral shaft are relatively common injuries and the majority achieve union uneventfully; however, non-union rates of up to 13% are reported when managed either conservatively or operatively. Despite the many surgical techniques described for the management of non-unions, including plate fixation, intramedullary nailing or external fixation, some cases remain resistant to treatment with ongoing problems achieving union.

METHOD

We describe a technique using the Stryker T2 humeral nail which incorporates a compression system allowing closure of the non-union fracture gap. Twelve patients underwent compression nailing for established humeral fracture non-union. All achieved radiological union at an average of 4.5 months (range 3-12 months).

RESULTS

All patients reported a return to their normal pre-injury level of activities.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that this technique of intramedullary nailing with a novel compression technique is effective in the treatment of humeral shaft fracture non-union.

Management of nonunions of the proximal humeral diaphysis

It has been reported that the majority of nonunions of the humeral shaft evaluated are within the proximal one-third of the diaphysis. We are not aware of any reported series of humeral nonunions dealing specifically with the proximal diaphysis. We therefore sought to identify patients with a humeral shaft nonunion from an orthopaedic trauma service database, determine the frequency of those within the proximal one-third and review our treatment strategy and resulting clinical outcomes for these difficult fractures. Clinical and radiographical follow-up was available for 19 patients with a mean age of 70 years (range 29-94 years). This represented 46% of all humeral shaft nonunions treated during the study period. Dual plating was used in 11 cases to get adequate fixation in the proximal segment. Post-operative alignment was within 5° of anatomic in all cases. All nonunions healed at an average of 15.2 weeks (range 8-36 weeks). The mean length of follow-up was 12.5 months (range 6-122 months). All patients reported significant improvement in pain. The mean range of motion following fracture union was forward flexion 137°, external rotation 41° and internal rotation 30°. There were two minor complications and neither required a secondary surgery. The surgical technique we have used emphasising a thorough debridement of the nonunion site, correction of the deformity, fracture site compression with a rigid construct and bone grafting provides excellent rates of union and clinical outcomes.

Operative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures: comparison between reconstruction plate and reconstruction locking compression plate

Background

To compare the outcomes of reconstruction plate and reconstruction locking compression plate (LCP) for the treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures.

Methods

Forty one patients with a clavicle midshaft fracture were treated by internal fixation with a reconstruction plate (19 patients) or reconstruction LCP (22 patients). The clinical and radiological results were evaluated according to the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and plain radiographs.

Results

The mean time to union was 14.6 weeks in the reconstruction plate group compared to 13.2 weeks in the reconstruction LCP group (p > 0.05). The mean score to Quick DASH was 33.85 points in the reconstruction plate group compared to 34.81 points in the reconstruction LCP group (p > 0.05). The complications in the reconstruction plate were hypertrophic scarring in 2 cases, painful shoulder in 2 cases, limitation of shoulder motion in 2 cases, and screw loosening in 3 cases. In addition, the complications in the reconstruction LCP group was hypertrophic scarring in 4 cases, painful shoulder in 1 case and a limitation of shoulder motion in 1case (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

This study showed radiologically and clinically satisfactory results in both groups. Overall, operative treatment with a Reconstruction plate or reconstruction LCP for clavicle shaft fractures can be used to obtain stable fixation.

Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of using two versus three locking screws per bone segment in a cadaveric humerus fracture gap model.

METHODS

Six matched pairs of elderly osteoporotic fresh-frozen human cadaveric humerii were used. An eight-hole locking compression plate was placed posteriorly on the humeral shaft and secured with either four or six bicortical locking screws. A 5-mm middiaphyseal gap osteotomy was created to simulate a comminuted fracture without bony contact. Specimens were tested in offset axial compression, four-point anteroposterior bending, four-point medial-lateral bending, and torsion. After the initial testing in each of these modalities, the constructs were cyclically loaded in torsion and again tested in the four loading modalities. Lastly, the fixation constructs were then tested to failure in torsion.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in stiffness between the group fixed with two screws per segment and the group fixed with three screws per segment. The peak torque to failure was higher in the four-screw construct compared with the six-screw construct. The mean torque to failure was 23.5 +/- 3.7 Nm in the construct with two locking screws per segment compared with 20.4 +/- 2.8 Nm in the construct with three locking screws per segment (P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a third screw in the locked plate construct did not add to the mechanical stability in axial loading, bending, or torsion. In testing to failure, the addition of a third screw resulted in lower load to failure.

Allografting in locked nailing and interfragmentary wiring for humeral nonunions

In this prospective study, we compared outcomes after repair of humeral nonunions when morsellized fresh-frozen allograft or autograft was used to augment repair by intramedullary nailing. Sixty-five patients with humeral shaft nonunions of greater than 6 months' duration and gross instability at the nonunion site were included and treated by locked nailing, interfragmentary wiring, and bone grafting. Graft type was determined by patient preference. Outcomes assessed included union rate and functional recovery of the arm. Secondary end points included operative blood loss, operation time, hospital stay, time to fracture healing, and complications. Twenty-eight patients with autografts and 36 with allografts were followed up more than 2 years. The baseline conditions of the two groups were similar. The autograft group had greater blood loss and longer operative time than the allograft group. The autograft group also had a longer hospital stay. The healing rate, time to healing, and functional scores did not differ between these two groups. In the autograft group, 43% reported pain and limited mobility as a result of the donor site. We concluded that when used in association with locked nailing for humeral nonunions, allografts can achieve treatment results similar to autografts but without donor site complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Revision with dynamic compression plate and cancellous bone graft for aseptic nonunion after surgical treatment of humeral shaft fracture

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effect of revision with dynamic compression plate (DCP) and cancellous bone graft for aseptic nonunion after surgical treatments of humeral shaft fracture.

METHOD

Eighty-six patients with aseptic nonunion of humeral shaft fracture after various surgical treatments were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively between January 1982 and August 2006. There were 59 men and 27 women with the average age of 42 years (range, 19-81 years). Thirty-one fractures were defined as atrophic nonunion, 45 fractures were hypertrophic nonunion, and 10 fractures could not be defined clearly. All the fractures were managed with removal of previous implants, open reduction and internal fixation with DCP, supplemented by cancellous bone graft. The follow-up period was 38 months in average (range, 12-288 months). Functional evaluations were done by Mayo Elbow Performance Index and the modified scale of Constant and Murley.

RESULTS

All the nonunions united with the average union time of 18 weeks (range, 14-26 weeks). Complications included five temporary radial nerve palsies and two wound infections. In final follow-up, the shoulder and elbow functions of the operated limbs were all noted to be good or excellent.

CONCLUSION

DCP with cancellous bone graft is a reliable and an effective treatment for revision of aseptic nonunion of humeral shaft fracture after surgical treatment.

Treatment of isolated ulnar nonunions using wave plate osteosynthesis: a report of four cases

With current operative techniques, it is rare that treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures results in nonunion. Because the rate of nonunion is low, there are only a few published articles that help guide management of forearm nonunions. We describe a new application of wave plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of isolated atrophic nonunions of the ulna. This biologic plating concept restores anatomic alignment without standard rigid fixation and aims to take advantage of the vascularity of the surrounding soft tissues to achieve union by secondary healing. This technique can be most useful in nonunions secondary to segmental bone defects or to large areas of nonviable bone.

Two-plate fixation for humeral shaft non-unions

PURPOSE. To review 22 patients who underwent 2-plate fixation for non-union of the humeral shaft. METHODS. 13 women and 9 men aged 32 to 76 (mean, 48) years underwent fixation for non-union of the humeral shaft, using a 2-plate construct, together with decortication, debridement, and bone grafting. The two 3.5-mm reconstruction plates were parallel and lying at 90 degrees to each other and fixed with screws purchasing into at least 6 cortices of each fragment for both plates. Fractures were located in the upper third (n=8) or middle third (n=14) of the humerus. Initial treatments included casting (n=9), coaptation splinting (n=8), multiple retrograde pinning (n=4), and Marchetti-Vicenzi nailing (n=1). 18 non-unions were atrophic and 4 were hypertrophic. Shoulder and elbow range of motion as well as functional results were evaluated. RESULTS. The time for union was 4.6 (range, 4-6) months. No implants were loose or broken. No nonunion or infection was noted. Functional results were excellent in 17 and good in 5 patients. One patient had iatrogenic radial nerve palsy that recovered within 3 months. CONCLUSION. Two-plate fixation achieves good results for humeral shaft non-unions.

Shortening osteotomy and compression plating for atrophic humeral nonunions: surgical technique

The incidence of nonunion after humeral shaft fractures is low with both operative and nonoperative interventions. However, when a delayed union or nonunion occurs, it can be a very debilitating, leading to limited function and pain. Several methods have been described for the management of humeral diaphyseal nonunions. We present 11 cases managed with a transverse, shortening osteotomy and compression plating with or without bone grafting. Of the 11 cases, 10 had prior surgical treatment of open reduction and internal fixation. Union was achieved in all 11 humeri.

Fixation of long bone segmental defects: a biomechanical study

OBJECTIVES

Obtaining stable fixation in cases of long bone non-union with segmental bone defects can be challenging. Bone quality is often sub-optimal. Locking plates and structural allografts have both been used clinically in these cases. The objective of this study was to determine the biomechanical characteristics of three constructs that have been employed in this context.

METHODS

A biomechanical study was performed using 3rd Generation Composite Femurs as specimens. A diaphyseal segmental defect was created and fixed with one of three constructs: (1) lateral locking plate (LP); (2) lateral non-locking plate and medial allograft strut (S); (3) lateral non-locking plate and intramedullary fibula allograft (F). The "allografts" were fashioned from 3rd generation composite bones. Axial, torsional and bending stiffness as well as load to failure were determined using a materials testing machine.

RESULTS

Overall, construct S was the stiffest and construct LP was the least stiff. Construct F had intermediate characteristics. Axial load to failure for construct S (6108N) and for construct F (5344N) was significantly greater than for construct LP (2855N).

CONCLUSION

When maximal stiffness is desired, a construct with a structural allograft should be chosen over a locking plate. However, biological and anatomic factors must also be taken into account when using these constructs clinically.

Treatment of the humeral shaft nonunion after surgical failure using the Selfdynamisable internal fixator

INTRODUCTION

A nonunion of the humeral shaft is not a rare condition and is a complication of both nonoperative and operative treatment of the fracture. Several fixation options were used in the nonunion treatment, including various plate techniques, intramedullary nails and external fixator. We applied our Selfdynamisable internal fixator for the treatment of humeral shaft nonunion after surgical failure and evaluated its clinical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six patients with persistent atrophic nonunion of the humeral shaft were treated with Selfdynamisable internal fixator. The inclusion criteria were mobile, unstable resistant nonunion of the humeral diaphysis which persisted after surgical treatment for nonunion. All patients were men with a mean age of 32 (27-39) years. The initial fracture treatment was external fixator in two patients and plaster cast for four patients. All cases failed to unite after primary treatment. Plate fixation was resorted for fracture union but failed. The revision surgery consisted of removal of hardware, freshening of bone ends and bone grafting, and internal fixation with a Selfdynamisable internal fixator.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 33 months. All the nonunions healed after indexed operation. The average time for union was 5.5 months (range 4-9 months). There was no loosening or breakage of the fixation device. The functional results, according to the scale of Constant and Murlay modified by Ring, were excellent in five and good in one patient. There were no complications of nerve injuries or infections related to the operation.

CONCLUSION

Selfdynamisable internal fixator with bone graft for the treatment of recalcitrant humeral shaft nonunion provided successful clinical outcome with minimal complications.

Ilizarov frame fixation without bone graft for atrophic humeral shaft nonunion: 28 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of patients with atrophic humeral shaft nonunion (HSNU) treated by Ilizarov frame fixation without the use of bone graft.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of 28 consecutive patients treated in 1 center between 1996 and 2002.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 28 consecutive patients: 12 male and 16 female. Of the patients, 21 had been previously operated (15 by internal fixation using compression plates, 3 by intramedullary nailing, and 3 by external fixation), and 9 of those 21 patients also had failed revision procedures; 7 patients had been treated nonoperatively from the time of injury to the time of the index procedure for HSNU. Mean age at the time of the index operation was 44 years (16-73 years).

INTERVENTION

Removal of the previous fixation device, excision of fibrous tissue at the HSNU site, opening of the intramedullary canal, excision of avascular bony ends, and stabilization fixation and compression of the humerus with an Ilizarov circular frame (proximal semicircular ring) using smooth 1.8-mm K-wires. No bone graft was used. The mean postoperative follow-up was 76 months (24-174 months).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Radiologic union using plain radiographs. Clinical and functional outcome using the Lammens system, which evaluates pain, range of shoulder and elbow movements (and their limitations), and humeral alignment and union. Patient subjective outcomes were assessed using a 4-point patient satisfaction questionnaire.

RESULTS

Bony union was achieved in all 28 cases after a mean of 4.1 months (3.4-5.7 months). There were 6 superficial pin tract infections (which resolved with antibiotics) and 1 transient radial nerve palsy (which resolved at 2.5 months). One patient refractured his humeral shaft following a fall, but the fracture successfully united 5.7 months later after a further Ilizarov frame application. All patients had good or excellent functional outcomes and range of shoulder and elbow movements as rated by the Lammens scoring system.

CONCLUSIONS

Ilizarov circular frame fixation without bone graft is a reliable method for the treatment of atrophic nonunion of the humerus, even after failed previous surgery.

Shoulder arthroplasty for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Between 1986 and 1997, 13 shoulders in adult patients who had severe polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis were treated with primary arthroplasty. Eleven shoulders were evaluated retrospectively by an independent observer with a mean follow-up of 9 years. Patient evaluation included pain Visual Analogue Scale, range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Short-Form 36. Patients' pain decreased significantly after surgery (mean 6.7). Forward elevation improved on average by 41.1 degrees and external rotation by 39.1 degrees , without evidence of shoulder instability. Final Short-Form 36 scores and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand results (mean, 44.7) were poor, but all patients rated themselves satisfied with the procedure. Shoulder arthroplasty provided pain relief for end-stage shoulder involvement in adult juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Improvement in external rotation in this severely affected group appears to have a beneficial effect on functional outcome.

Locking plate technology and its role in osteoporotic fractures

Osteoporosis is a public health issue that leads to increased morbidity and dependency in an increasing population. Fractures in osteoporotic bone have been a contraindication to internal fixation due to their past poor results. Various treatment methods and innovations have been attempted that have met with some success. This paper reviews one such innovation, locking-plate osteosynthesis, looking at its technology and success and its role in osteoporotic patients. As this is an evolving technology, surgeon's experience with these plates and screws are in advance of clinical studies and therefore the surgeons should proceed with caution when choosing locking plate technology in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures.

Humeral fractures in the elderly: treatment with a reamed intramedullary locking nail

In the elderly person, comorbidities combined with lower functional demands tend to indicate non-operative treatment; however, fast functional recovery is mandatory to prevent loss of independency and social ability. This retrospective follow-up study included 40 people with a mean age of 75 (range 60-87) years. They had all received treatment with a reamed intramedullary nail for humeral fracture; 21 were operated after a mean of 6 (range 0-16) days, and 19 after a mean of 28 (range 9-63) days after a primary decision for non-operative treatment. In all, 5 cases (12.5%) were lost to follow-up. The primary healing rate was 94% (33/35) after a mean of 17 (range 6-61) weeks; 14% (5/35) needed re-operation, in 2 cases because of healing problems. Functional results could be assessed in 18 cases: the median Neer score was 90 (range 45-97) points and the median Morrey score 98 (range 74-100) points. The relative functional scores were 94 (range 89-101) and 100 (range 97-100) points, respectively. All functional scores were independent of introduction site and time to treatment. On the basis of these results we conclude that treatment of humeral fractures in the elderly with an intramedullary nail leads to good healing and functional results, and an acceptable re-operation rate.

Humeral diaphyseal aseptic non-unions: an Algorithm of management

Successful operative treatment of a humeral shaft non-union may be a challenge for the surgeon. Several treatment options have been reported over the years. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Twenty-three retrieved articles (level of evidence IV) fulfilled our inclusion criteria and dealt with aseptic diaphyseal humeral non-union managed by plating, intramedullary nailing and external fixation based on Ilizarov's principles. Despite an obvious superiority of plating in the treatment of humeral shaft non-unions, there is no doubt that intramedullary nailing as well as external fixation devices have a role. An algorithm of management of the humeral shaft non-unions following a rational approach is suggested.

Nonunion After Functional Brace Treatment of Diaphyseal Humerus Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To assess which fractures of the humeral diaphysis are prone to nonunion after functional bracing by analyzing patients that present for treatment of nonunion after brace treatment.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients treated operatively for a nonunion of the diaphyseal humerus after functional brace treatment were analyzed with respect to the location and the pattern of the original fracture. There were 21 women and 11 men with an average age of 53 years (range 23-84 years).

RESULTS

The fracture involved the proximal third of the diaphysis in 17 patients, the middle third in 14 patients, and the distal third in 1 patient. The pattern of the fracture was oblique or spiral in 27 patients with a butterfly fragment in 11 of those patients. Only four patients had a transverse fracture. Operative fixation ultimately achieved union in all 32 patients, but a second procedure was necessary for loosening of fixation or persistent nonunion in 3 older-aged patients. The functional results were good or excellent in all 32 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the epidemiology of acute diaphyseal humerus fractures, nonunions after functional bracing are more likely to follow spiral/oblique fractures that involve the mid- or proximal-third of the diaphysis. Operative treatment can gain union and improve arm function.

A Comparison of Self-Reported and Independently Observed Disability in an Orthopedic Trauma Population

BACKGROUND

Although outcome measures that assess disability after isolated orthopedic injuries have been found to be valid and responsive to change, the reliability of self-reported disability has not been studied in these patients. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported and independently observed disability in patients with isolated orthopedic injuries.

METHODS

Items were selected from the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcome assessment instruments. Participants had either an isolated upper (n = 61) or lower extremity (n = 55) injury or were noninjured controls (n = 40). Participants completed the SMFA and DASH before being videotaped completing items selected from the outcome assessment instruments. Observers reviewed the video and rated participants' levels of disability in performing the items.

RESULTS

Observers consistently rated the disability levels for the items lower than the participants. Overall, agreement in levels of disability between observers and participants varied greatly across the different items (quadratic weighted kappa; range, 0.00-0.82).

CONCLUSION

The results emphasize that patients and observers differ in their assessment of an individual's level of disability in performing items related to activities of daily living. Therefore, caution should be used when data collected by a proxy observer is used to substitute self-reported data.