Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty

Clinical and Computational Evaluation of an Anatomic Patellar Component

BACKGROUND

Anatomic patellar components for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have demonstrated favorable in vivo kinematics. A novel failure mechanism in TKA patients with an anatomic patellar component was observed prompting an investigation to identify patient- and implant-related factors associated with suboptimal performance.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was performed comparing 100 TKA patients with an anatomic patellar component to 100 gender-, age-, and body mass index-matched patients with a medialized dome component. All surgeries were performed with the same posterior-stabilized TKA system with minimum of 1-year follow-up. Several radiographic parameters were assessed. A separate computational evaluation was performed using finite-element analysis, comparing bone strain energy density through the patella bone remnant.

RESULTS

Patients with an anatomic patellar component had significantly higher rates of anterior knee pain (18 versus 2%, P < .001), chronic effusions (18 versus 2%, P < .001), and superior patellar pole fragmentation (36 versus 13%, P < .001) compared to those with a dome component. Radiographically, the anatomic group demonstrated more lateral patellar subluxation (2.3 versus 1.1 mm, P < .001) and lateral tilt (5.4 versus 4.0 mm, P = .013). Furthermore, there were more revisions in the anatomic group (7 versus 3, P = .331). On computational evaluation, all simulations demonstrated increased bone strain energy density at the superior patellar pole with the anatomic patella. Resection thickness <13 mm resulted in over 2-fold higher strain energy density, and negative resection angle of 7° resulted in 6-fold higher superior pole strain energy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an anatomic patellar component showed higher rates of anterior knee pain, chronic effusion, and superior pole fragmentation compared to patients with a dome patella, with higher superior patellar pole strain energy confirmed on computational evaluation. Avoiding higher resection angles and excessive patellar resection may improve the performance and survivorship of the anatomic patella.

Differences in Trochlear Morphology of a New Femoral Component Designed for Kinematic Alignment from a Mechanical Alignment Design

Because kinematic alignment (KA) aligns femoral components in greater valgus and with less external rotation than mechanical alignment (MA), the trochlear groove of an MA design used in KA is medialized, which can lead to complications. Hence, a KA design has emerged. In this study, our primary objective was to quantify differences in trochlear morphology between the KA design and the MA design from which the KA design evolved. The KA and MA designs were aligned in KA on ten 3D femur-cartilage models. Dependent variables describing the morphology of the trochlea along the anterior flange, which extends proximal to the native trochlea, and along the arc length of the native trochlea, were determined, as was flange coverage. Along the anterior flange, the KA groove was significantly lateral proximally by 10 mm and was significantly wider proximally by 5 mm compared to the MA design (p < 0.0001). Along the arc length of the native trochlea, the KA groove was significantly lateral to the MA design by 4.3 mm proximally (p ≤ 0.0001) and was significantly wider proximally by 19 mm than the MA design. The KA design reduced lateral under-coverage of the flange from 4 mm to 2 mm (p < 0.0001). The KA design potentially mitigates risk of patellofemoral complications by lateralizing and widening the groove to avoid medializing the patella for wide variations in the lateral distal femoral angle, and by widening the flange laterally to reduce under-coverage. This information enables clinicians to make informed decisions regarding use of the KA design.

Differences in Trochlear Morphology from Native Using a Femoral Component Interfaced with an Anatomical Patellar Prosthesis in Kinematic Alignment and Mechanical Alignment

Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty can be traced in part to alignment of the femoral component. Kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) use the same femoral component but align the component differently. Our objective was to determine differences in trochlear morphology from native for a femoral component interfaced with an anatomical patellar prosthesis in KA and MA. Ten three-dimensional femur-cartilage models were created by combining computed tomography and laser scans of native human cadaveric femurs free of skeletal abnormalities. The femoral component was positioned using KA and MA. Measurements of the prosthetic and native trochlea were made along the arc length of the native trochlear groove and differences from native were computed for the medial-lateral and radial locations of the groove and sulcus angle. Mean medial-lateral locations of the prosthetic groove were within 1.5 and 3.5 mm of native for KA and MA, respectively. Mean radial locations of the prosthetic groove were as large as 5 mm less than native for KA and differences were greater for MA. Sulcus angles of the prosthetic trochlea were 10 degrees steeper proximally, and 10 degrees flatter distally than native for both KA and MA. Largest differences from native occurred for radial locations and sulcus angles for both KA and MA. The consistency of these results with those of other fundamentally different designs which use a modified dome (i.e., sombrero hat) patellar prosthesis highlights the need to reassess the design of the prosthetic trochlea on the part of multiple manufacturers worldwide.

Patella Strength Characteristics in Cemented vs Press-fit Implants: A Biomechanical Analysis of Initial Stability

Background

Patellar resurfacing is routinely performed during total knee arthroplasty to reduce pain associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis. With 3-dimensional ingrowth materials readily available, the present study aimed to evaluate if cemented polyethylene (CP) patellar buttons conferred higher ultimate load to failure than press-fit metal-backed (PF) buttons in axial compression.

Material and methods

Ten matched cadaveric and 20 composite patellae were resurfaced and implanted with either a PF or CP button. Biomechanical testing using an MTS machine was performed to measure the force required to generate a periprosthetic patella fracture. Mean load to failure and load to failure per 1-mm patellar thickness were compared with a paired and independent samples Students’ t-test for the cadaveric and composite patellae, respectively.

Results

The average load to failure for the matched cadaveric patellae with PF implants was significantly lower than that for patellae with CP buttons (4082.05 N vs 5898.37 N, P = .045). The average load to failure for composite patella with PF implants was significantly higher than that for composite patellae with CP implants (6004.09 N vs 4551.40 N, P = .001). The mean load to failure per 1-mm patellar thickness was also significantly higher for composite patellae with PF implants (263.80 N/mm vs 200.37 N/mm, P = .001).

Conclusion

Cadaveric patellae with cemented implants had a significantly higher ultimate load to failure in axial compression than press-fit patella. However, this result was reversed in the composite model. Exploration of biological and composite model properties could provide further insight into patellar implant selection during total knee arthroplasty.

Outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (Review)

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging surgical procedure. Although good results are presented, the outcomes are worse in comparison with those of primary TKA, with a higher failure rate. The main reasons for the failure of revision TKA include: sepsis, loosening and instability. There are multiple variables linked to these results, and it is difficult to determinate the exact cause as it is often a multifactorial issue. These variables may be related to the quality of the index-procedure (TKA), to the revision procedure or to patient characteristics. The purpose of this review was to highlight the outcomes of revision knee arthroplasty and main factors that may influence the results. Considerable progress has been made during the last 30 years regarding infection treatment and prevention, complex revision prosthetic design and surgical technique development. Although the outcomes have improved over time, patients who undergo revision TKA may need further re-operations in the future.

Short-Term Follow-Up of Patellar Component Revision in Patients With Isolated Patellar Component Loosening

BACKGROUND

The etiology of patellar component loosening can be multifactorial, including component malposition, trauma, infection, and poor implant design. These cases may be managed with isolated patellar component revision or simultaneous patellar component with femoral and/or tibial component revision. Isolated patellar revision in the setting of aseptic loosening historically has had limited success with high rates of repeat revision.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 75 cases diagnosed with patellar component loosening that underwent revision. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Cases were categorized as either isolated patellar (IP) revision or patellar with femoral and/or tibial component (P + O) revisions. Survivorship and re-revision causes were compared between groups. Secondary outcomes included surgical time, estimated blood loss, range of motion, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent IP revision, and 25 patients had P + O revision. Overall survivorship at the 2-year follow-up interval was 94.6%. Survivorship of IP revision undertaken for aseptic loosening was 94%. Survivorship of P + O revision was 96%. Eight percent of patients required reoperation from the P + O revision group, while 12% of patients in the IP revision group underwent a reoperation. Patients undergoing IP revision had better postoperative range of motion, lower surgical times, lower estimated blood loss, and decreased length of stay.

CONCLUSION

IP revision demonstrates excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes comparable to P + O revision. When appropriate, IP revision should be considered as a potential treatment option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Long-Term Results of Patellar Bone-Grafting for Severe Patellar Bone Loss During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on managing severe patellar bone loss after total knee arthroplasty. We previously described an initial series involving a novel technique of patellar bone-grafting with a short follow-up. The purpose of this study was to determine long-term survivorship and the radiographic and clinical results of patellar bone-grafting during revision total knee arthroplasty in a larger series with an extended follow-up.

METHODS

We identified 90 patients from a single institution who underwent 93 patellar bone-grafting procedures for severe patellar bone loss from 1997 to 2014. The mean age of the patients was 70 years, and 46% of patients were female. Forty-five knees (48%) underwent first-time revisions, and 19 knees (20%) had undergone a failed attempt at patellar resurfacings. Intraoperative patellar caliper thickness increased from a mean of 7 to 25 mm after patellar bone-grafting (p < 0.01). Radiographic review determined changes in patellar height, tracking, and remodeling. Knee Society scores (KSSs) were calculated. The mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 18 years). Kaplan-Meier methods determined survivorship free of any revision and any reoperation. Cox proportional hazards analysis determined predictive factors for failure.

RESULTS

Survivorship free of patellar revision was 96% at 10 years. Survivorship free of any revision was 84% at 10 years. Survivorship free of any reoperation was 78% at 10 years. Increasing patient age was the only protective factor against further patellar revision (hazard ratio, 0.95; p < 0.01). When comparing initial radiographs with final radiographs, patellar height decreased from 22 to 19 mm (p < 0.01), 80% compared with 59% of patellae articulated centrally in the trochlea (p = 0.01), and 32% compared with 77% had remodeling over the lateral femoral condyle (p < 0.01). Anterior knee pain decreased from 51% to 27% postoperatively (p = 0.01). The mean knee flexion improved from 101° to 108° (p = 0.03). The mean KSS improved from 50 to 85 points (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable long-term clinical results can be expected with patellar bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Pain, range of motion, and other reported outcomes improve despite radiographic changes to patellar height, tracking, and remodeling. This technique is a durable and reliable option when standard patellar resurfacing is not possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcome of prosthesis matched and unmatched patella components in primary and revision total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Although knee replacements have specifically designed patella prostheses that correspond to the geometry of their femoral components, a patella prosthesis that is unmatched to the femoral component may occasionally be inserted. In revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an originally resurfaced patella may be left, but the femoral component revised to one that does not match the patella. Few studies have compared the outcome of matched and unmatched patella components in TKA. This study compared the primary or revision TKA outcome of procedures where patella components matched to their femoral counterparts were inserted, with procedures using patella and femoral components that were unmatched.

METHODS

Data on all primary and revision TKA procedures without a patella component or a matched or an unmatched patella component were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Revision surgery was the outcome measure. Cumulative percent revised (CPR) were calculated and Hazard ratios with p values were used to test statistical significance.

RESULTS

In primary TKA, there were higher rates of revision where unmatched patella components were used, regardless of implant design. There was no difference in the second revision rates of unmatched versus matched patella component groups. This was evident where delayed resurfacing was carried out, and where the patella prosthesis was left alone but the femoral component was changed.

CONCLUSIONS

All primary TKA procedures require a patella component corresponding to the femoral component if the patella is resurfaced. Conversely, revision knee arthroplasties are not affected by the use of dissimilar patella and femoral components.

[Causes and management of patellar instability after total knee replacement : Lateralization, subluxation and luxation]

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty are responsible for a variety of surgical revisions.

OBJECTIVE

The causes of the various types of instability of the patella are listed in a differentiated way and the importance of clinical and imaging diagnostics as well as preventive strategies are elaborated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This article is based on a selective literature search in the PubMed database and on the long-standing experience of the author.

RESULTS

Besides postoperative genu valgum with malalignment of the extensor mechanisms, other risk factors for patellar maltracking are insufficiency of the medial retinaculum, weakening of the vastus medialis muscle, contracture of the quadriceps femoris or tractus iliotibialis muscle, residual valgus deformity after total knee replacement, femoral or tibial malrotation as well as malpositioning of the patella, inappropriate design of the prosthesis and asymmetrical resection of the patella. The causes with respect to incorrect component positioning, faulty preparation of the patella, leg malalignment, inappropriate design of the prosthesis and soft tissue imbalance have to be recognized in order to address the problem in a targeted way. The preferred method of choice in the case of patellofemoral instability after total knee replacement is normally surgery; however, the cause for the instability has to be identified and consequently corrected before surgery. Without a clearly identified cause surgical measures are unrewarding and almost regularly lead to an unsatisfactory outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patella maltracking after total knee arthroplasty is multifactorial and requires an accurate clarification. A surgical revision is only recommended in cases of clearly defined causes of pain or a clearly defined reason for patella malpositioning.

Failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In Norway, the proportion of revision knee arthroplasties increased from 6.9% in 1994 to 8.5% in 2011. However, there is limited information on the epidemiology and causes of subsequent failure of revision knee arthroplasty. We therefore studied survival rate and determined the modes of failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties.

METHOD

This study was based on 1,016 aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1994 and 2011. Revisions done for infections were not included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the survival rate and the relative risk of re-revision with all causes of re-revision as endpoint.

RESULTS

145 knees failed after revision total knee arthroplasty. Deep infection was the most frequent cause of re-revision (28%), followed by instability (26%), loose tibial component (17%), and pain (10%). The cumulative survival rate for revision total knee arthroplasties was 85% at 5 years, 78% at 10 years, and 71% at 15 years. Revision total knee arthroplasties with exchange of the femoral or tibial component exclusively had a higher risk of re-revision (RR = 1.7) than those with exchange of the whole prosthesis. The risk of re-revision was higher for men (RR = 2.0) and for patients aged less than 60 years (RR = 1.6).

INTERPRETATION

In terms of implant survival, revision of the whole implant was better than revision of 1 component only. Young age and male sex were risk factors for re-revision. Deep infection was the most frequent cause of failure of revision of aseptic total knee arthroplasties.

The impact of patellar resurfacing in two-stage revision of the infected total knee arthroplasty

Evidence for optimal management of the patellofemoral joint in revision surgery for the infected TKA is limited. We reviewed 69 infected TKAs undergoing two-stage revision. Fifty four patellae were resurfaced, 11 had patelloplasty performed, two were augmented with trabecular metal, one had impaction grafting, and one knee underwent patellectomy. Average follow-up was 4.5 years. The patients that received patellar resurfacing at re-implantation experienced statistically significant improvements in KSS pain score, functional KSS, and patellar score (P < 0.03). One further patient treated with impaction grafting improved significantly in terms of pain and function. Patients treated with patelloplasty, trabecular metal augmentation, or patellectomy did not have significant improvements in clinical or functional outcome. Patient age, use of dynamic vs. static spacer, use of extensor mechanism release, and differences in Charlson index did not seem to statistically affect outcome. We recommend that every effort should be made to minimize patellar bone loss in first stage resection, as inability to resurface the patella at time of reimplantation may adversely affect patient outcome.

Lateral patellar facet impingement after primary total knee arthroplasty: it does exist

The existence of the diagnosis "lateral patellar facet impingement" (LPFI) is controversial and the outcomes for surgical revision for symptomatic LPFI uncertain. We found that of the 3361 index knee revisions performed at our institution from 1995 to 2008, eleven were done for symptomatic LPFI. Their clinical histories and radiographic imaging were reviewed before and after revision TKA and were also compared to a group of control patients. We found no statistically significant differences between the groups in preoperative KS pain and function scores or radiographic features. However, the combined findings of pain in the subpatellar/lateral aspect of the knee post TKA and radiographic lateral facet contact were significantly associated with revision due to LPFI. Surgical revision results were variable, but~2/3 of the patients were satisfied with the operation and had a significant improvement in KS function scores.

The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus?

Early arthroplasty designs were associated with a high level of anterior knee pain as they failed to cater for the patello-femoral joint. Patellar resurfacing was heralded as the saviour safeguarding patient satisfaction and success but opinion on its necessity has since deeply divided the scientific community and has become synonymous to topics of religion or politics. Opponents of resurfacing contend that the native patella provides better patellar tracking, improved clinical function, and avoids implant-related complications, whilst proponents argue that patients have less pain, are overall more satisfied, and avert the need for secondary resurfacing. The question remains whether complications associated with patellar resurfacing including those arising from future component revision outweigh the somewhat increased incidence of anterior knee pain recorded in unresurfaced patients. The current scientific literature, which is often affected by methodological limitations and observer bias, remains confusing as it provides evidence in support of both sides of the argument, whilst blinded satisfaction studies comparing resurfaced and non-resurfaced knees generally reveal equivalent results. Even national arthroplasty register data show wide variations in the proportion of patellar resurfacing between countries that cannot be explained by cultural differences alone. Advocates who always resurface or never resurface indiscriminately expose the patella to a random choice. Selective resurfacing offers a compromise by providing a decision algorithm based on a propensity for improved clinical success, whilst avoiding potential complications associated with unnecessary resurfacing. Evidence regarding the validity of selection criteria, however, is missing, and the decision when to resurface is often based on intuitive reasoning. Our lack of understanding why, irrespective of pre-operative symptoms and patellar resurfacing, some patients may suffer pain following TKA and others may not have so far stifled our efforts to make the strategy of selective resurfacing succeed. We should hence devote our efforts in defining predictive criteria and indicators that will enable us to reliably identify those individuals who might benefit from a resurfacing procedure. Level of evidence V.

[The third compartment in knee endoprosthetics: from denervation to replacement, which therapy is correct?]

Involvement of the patellofemoral compartment is common in osteoarthritis of the knee but to date there is no consensus as to the most appropriate approach concerning the patella. Both general non-selective resurfacing as well as selective or secondary resurfacing are currently accepted. However, despite abundant studies on the subject no clear conclusions can be drawn from the available evidence. There are arguments in favour of either approach. Accordingly, no strong evidence can be found to support peripatellar denervation. With the advent of new diagnostic modalities for the assessment of knee osteoarthritis, such as single photon emission computed tomography/CT (SPECT/CT), a more selective approach to patellar resurfacing with a potentially improved outcome might become possible.

Patellar resurfacing as a second stage procedure for persistent anterior knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Knee pain after total knee arthroplasty may be caused by an unresurfaced patella. Secondary isolated resurfacing of the previously unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcome after patellar resurfacing as a second stage procedure.

METHODS

The study included 22 patients (13 female/nine male) who underwent resurfacing of the patella with a mean follow-up of 61.8 ± 39.2 months. The mean age of the patients was 60 ± 9.7 years at the time of operation. The average period between total knee arthroplasty and patellar resurfacing was 26.3 ± 15.2 months. The patient's subjective satisfaction was assessed by a custom-made questionnaire.

RESULTS

The mean Knee Society Score improved significantly from 60.1 ± 8.3 to 77.0 ± 6.3 (p = 0.0063). The mean functional score also improved significantly from 42.7 ± 2.3 to 60.2 ± 3.9 (p = 0.001). Three patients (13.6%) needed further operative revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical scores showed significant improvement some patients continued to have pain and remained dissatisfied without detecting a specific reason. Further studies are needed to better elucidate the benefit of patellar resurfacing as second stage procedure.

Porous tantalum patellar components in revision total knee arthroplasty minimum 5-year follow-up

Revision total knee arthroplasty can be complicated by severe patellar bone loss, precluding the use of standard cemented patellar components. This study evaluated the midterm outcomes of porous tantalum (PT) patellar components. Twenty-three PT components were used in 6 men and 17 women (average age, 62 years). All patellae had less than 10-mm residual thickness. The PT shell was secured to host bone, and a 3-peg polyethylene component was cemented onto the shell. In 2 patients, the PT component was sutured directly to extensor mechanism. Average follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 5-10 years). At follow-up, the Knee Society scores for pain and function averaged 82.7 and 33.3, respectively, whereas the mean Oxford knee score was 32.6. Four patients underwent revision surgery. Survivorship was 19 (83%) of 23 patients. Porous tantalum patellar components can provide fixation where severe bone loss precludes the use of traditional implants. Failures were associated with avascular residual bone and fixation of components to the extensor mechanism.

Are current total knee arthroplasty implants designed to restore normal trochlear groove anatomy?

Biomechanical studies have shown that external rotation of the femoral TKA component improves patellar tracking but does not restore it to physiologic values. We hypothesized that this could be due to differences in the trochlear groove geometry of TKA and normal knees. This was investigated via a virtual TKA procedure that mounted femoral components on to 3-dimensional models of healthy femurs, followed by measurement of the trochlear geometry before and after the simulated TKA. The results showed that (1) external rotation of the component brought the trochlear groove closer to normal anatomy than no external rotation; (2) however, even with external rotation, the trochlear anatomy was only partially restored to normal. Further work is needed to determine implications for patellofemoral complications observed with current TKA designs.

Early outcomes of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty is a contentious issue. The literature suggests that resurfacing of the patella is based on surgeon preference, and little is known about the role and timing of resurfacing and how this affects outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 134,799 total knee arthroplasties using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Hazards ratios (HRs) were used to compare rates of early revision between patella resurfacing at the primary procedure (the resurfacing group, R) and primary arthroplasty without resurfacing (no-resurfacing group, NR). We also analyzed the outcomes of NR that were revised for isolated patella addition.

RESULTS

At 5 years, the R group showed a lower revision rate than the NR group: cumulative per cent revision (CPR) 3.1% and 4.0%, respectively (HR = 0.75, p < 0.001). Revisions for patellofemoral pain were more common in the NR group (17%) than in the R group (1%), and "patella only" revisions were more common in the NR group (29%) than in the R group (6%). Non-resurfaced knees revised for isolated patella addition had a higher revision rate than patella resurfacing at the primary procedure, with a 4-year CPR of 15% and 2.8%, respectively (HR = 4.1, p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Rates of early revision of primary total knees were higher when the patella was not resurfaced, and suggest that surgeons may be inclined to resurface later if there is patellofemoral pain. However, 15% of non-resurfaced knees revised for patella addition are re-revised by 4 years. Our results suggest an early beneficial outcome for patella resurfacing at primary arthroplasty based on revision rates up to 5 years.

Magnetic resonance imaging of in vivo patellofemoral kinematics after total knee arthroplasty

Simulated partial weight bearing during magnetic resonance imaging of the knee was used to measure patellar tilt, medial-lateral patellar shift, and patellofemoral contact area in three groups of subjects; patients with posterior cruciate retaining (PCR) TKA, patients with bicruciate substituting (BCS) TKA, and healthy controls. Contact stress was also calculated based on the contact area and body weight-based estimates of contact force. Contact stress was significantly (p<0.05) higher in PCR knees (2.5+/-3.0 MPa) than in BCS knees (0.2+/-0.1 MPa) when knees were fully extended, but this difference was not significant (3.7+/-3.5 MPa for PCR knees vs. 1.4+/-1.9 MPa for BCS knees; p>0.05) in early flexion. The results also indicate that patellar tilt (normal=2.4 degrees +/-4.8 degrees, BCS=5.5 degrees +/-5.5 degrees, PCR=-3.0 degrees +/-6.9 degrees change in lateral tilt when moving from full extension to early flexion) and contact area (full extension: normal=267+/-111 mm(2), BCS=344+/-201 mm(2), PCR=83+/-80 mm(2); early flexion: normal=723+/-306 mm(2), BCS=417+/-290 mm(2), PCR=246+/-108 mm(2)) in BCS TKA mimic those in the normal knees more closely than PCR knees do. These results suggest that the patellar component in BCS TKA may be expected to experience less wear than the patellar component in PCR TKA over time.

Contemporary cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with a pegged tibial baseplate. Results at a minimum of ten years

BACKGROUND

A total knee arthroplasty with a four-peg tibial baseplate is an uncommonly used contemporary design. Potential advantages of this baseplate include preservation of host bone, compatibility with minimally invasive techniques, and easier removal with revision techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term results of a contemporary total knee arthroplasty that included a four-peg tibial baseplate.

METHODS

From February 1995 to December 1996, 127 total knee arthroplasties were performed by one surgeon in 115 patients with an average age of seventy years. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed with use of the Knee Society scoring system at a minimum of ten years following replacement. Complications were identified by means of chart review and screening for readmission at surrounding institutions.

RESULTS

At the time of follow-up, at a minimum of ten years after the arthroplasty, thirty patients (with thirty-three involved knees) were documented to have died and four patients (with seven involved knees) could not be located. The next-of-kin of the patients who had died directly confirmed that the knee was unrevised at the time of death. Eighty-seven knees in eighty-one patients remained available for evaluation after a minimum of ten years of follow-up. Two knees had failed: one had a late infection at three years, and one had aseptic loosening at seven years. The rate of survival free of revision at ten years was 97%. Knee Society knee and function scores averaged 94 and 75 points, respectively. None of the remaining knees had radiographic evidence of loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated excellent, durable clinical and radiographic results at a minimum of ten years after replacement with this cemented, modular, fixed-bearing, cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis with a four-peg tibial baseplate. We believe that this design is an acceptable option for total knee arthroplasty.

How to address the patella in revision total knee arthroplasty

Patellar issues need to be carefully addressed during any revision TKA and the surgeon often faces the question of what to do with the patella at the time of revision. The choice of treatment is often made by balancing what is technically feasible with the risk of potential complications and takes into account the reason for the revision, the type of implant (i.e., metal-backing or all-polyethylene), the duration of implantation, the fixation, the stability, the sterilization technique, the wear, the presence of osteolysis, the compatibility with the femoral component, and most importantly the remaining bone stock. The various treatment options then include retention of the patellar component, revision of the patellar component, removal of the component with retention of the patellar bony shell (patelloplasty or resection arthroplasty), excision of the patella (partial or total patellectomy), secondary resurfacing, and reconstruction/augmentation of the patellar bone stock. Isolated patellar revision is associated with a high complication rate and recurrent failure when poor patellar tracking, incongruent designs and malalignment of the femoral and tibial components exist. Retention of a well-fixed all-PE (non-oxidized) patella is advocated where possible and revision of metal-backed patella is recommended (unless well fixed with poor bone stock). In the situation of a deficient patella, patelloplasty, augmentation procedures and very rarely patellectomy are other viable options.

Isolated all-polyethylene patellar revisions for metal-backed patellar failure

The outcome of isolated patellar component revisions after metal-backed patellar failure is variable with satisfactory results reported from 78% to 100%. To supplement information in the literature we determined the failure rate and the functional outcome based on the Knee Society clinical and roentgenographic evaluation systems of isolated patellar component revisions after metal-backed patellar component failure. We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients with 28 isolated patellar component revisions for metal-backed patellar component failure performed between 1988 and 2005. Twenty-five knees in 24 patients were available for review with a minimum followup of 24 months (mean, 90 months; range, 24-210 months). All knees were revised with a cemented all-polyethylene patellar component and all tibial polyethylene components were routinely exchanged. One failure (4%) occurred 122.6 months after the isolated patellar component revision secondary to femoral and tibial component loosening. The average Knee Society knee score improved from 73 to 89 points, whereas the average Knee Society function score improved from 56 to 65. Our data confirm those in the literature suggesting a successful outcome can be achieved with an isolated patellar component revision for metal-backed patellar component failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty

The management of the patellar articular surface at the time of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. We used expected-value decision analysis to determine whether the patella should be resurfaced in TKA, and also whether secondary resurfacing on an unresurfaced patella is worthwhile. Outcome probabilities and utility values were derived from randomized controlled trials only. A decision tree was constructed and fold-back analysis was performed to ascertain the best treatment path. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effect on decision-making of varying outcome probabilities and utilities. Our model showed patellar resurfacing is the best management strategy for the patella at the time of primary TKA. This decision is robust to changes in the specific data: the best path would remain the same as long as the incidence of persistent anterior knee pain (AKP) with resurfacing remains less than 29% (current mean, 12%) or the incidence of AKP after nonresurfacing falls below 12% (current mean, 26%). Delayed (ie, secondary) patellar resurfacing for ongoing patellar pain provides inferior results for the majority of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, decision analysis. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Retention of superficially damaged femoral components after metal-backed patella component failure

Metal-backed patellar components have been associated with high rates of failure often causing surface damage to the femoral component. Retention of a superficially damaged femoral component may be an alternative to a more extensive patellar and femoral component revision. Twenty-three metal-backed patellar components were revised. Superficially damaged femoral components were retained when a described set of criteria were met. At an average follow-up of 80.3 months, evidence of only 1 failure (4%) was observed. The Knee Society knee score improved from 69 to 88 (P < .001), whereas the Knee Society knee function score improved from 52 to 63 (P < .003). The findings from this study indicate that retaining a superficially damaged femoral component after metal-backed patella revision is a reasonable surgical option.

Fixation strength comparison of onlay and inset patellar implants

Patellar implant fixation continues to be one of the most troublesome areas in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It has been reported that patellofemoral complications in TKA are responsible for almost half of all re-operations. The literature review revealed the rate of primary all-polyethylene patellar implant loosening ranging 1%-4.2% [Berend ME, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Crites BM. The failure of all-polyethylene patellar components in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2001;388:105-11, Chew JT, Stewart NJ, Hanssen AD, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN. Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs. Clin Orthop 1997;345:87-98, Barrack RL, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a five to seven year follow-up of prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Proceedings of Sixty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2000. p. 547]. The loosening rates for metal-backed or following patellar component revisions were considerably higher [Chew JT, Stewart NJ, Hanssen AD, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN. Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs. Clin Orthop 1997;345:87-98, Jordan LR, Sorrells RB, Jordan LC, Olivo JL. The long-term results of a metal-backed mobile bearing patella. Clin Orthop 2005;436:111-8, Berger RA, Lyon, JH, Jacobs JJ, Barden RM, Berkson EM, Sheinkop MB, et al. Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup. Clin Orthop 2001;392:196-207, Ritter MA, Pierce MJ, Zhou H, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM. Patellar complications (total knee arthroplasty). Effect of lateral release and thickness. Clin Orthop 1999;367:149-57] Onlay and inset patellar components with variable fixation surface geometry are currently available for clinical use. The purpose of this study was to quantify the shear disassociation strength for both onlay and inset patellar fixation techniques. The variation in host material was minimized by the use of synthetic patellae, which has been previously validated in implant fixation studies. The testing revealed that inset patellar fixation resistance to shear disassociation was 25% higher than onlay patellae (p=0.0002).

Early mechanical failure in total knee arthroplasty

Early mechanical dysfunction of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging problem in terms of causality and solutions. The current strategy in our department is to perform a complete TKA revision rather than the less invasive partial procedures when a clear mechanical cause of failure has been found. In this investigation, we assessed 21 patients who underwent complete TKA revision in 2003-2004 in our institution within the first two years following the index TKA. Various clinical presentations included pain, stiffness, instability, and femoro-patellar signs. These corresponded to implant size, position, and fixation issues. The IKS knee score/function significantly increased from 47/47 to 85/78 at follow-up (six months minimum). Compared to the data in the literature, this systematic full revision seems to be a reasonable approach. This attitude takes advantage of the modularity of the implants for allowing perioperative adjustments of position, fixation, and constraint. Based on the results of our study, we propose a list of six mechanical pitfalls to be evaluated in the case of early dysfunction: frontal misalignment, sagittal overstuffing or malpositioning, axial malrotation, poor bone fixation, inappropriate constraint or ligamentous balance, and inappropriate level of the joint space.

Isolated revision of failed metal-backed patellar components: outcome with minimum 4-year follow-up

Several reports document high failure rates of metal-backed patellar components, but few report the outcome of revising these components to all-polyethylene, cemented implants. At a mean 87.2-month follow-up, we describe a series of 36 patients (40 knees) who underwent isolated metal-backed patellar revision to a cemented, all-polyethylene patellar component. After the patellar revision, 5 patients (6 knees) underwent additional surgery, but no patellar components required revision. The additional surgeries were performed at an average of 77.6 months after patellar revision and included 3 tibial insert exchanges for polyethylene wear, 2 revisions of femoral and tibial components for osteolysis, and 1 realignment procedure for recurrent subluxation of the patella. We conclude that revision of a failed metal-backed patellar component to a cemented, all-polyethylene patella is a durable, successful procedure.

Revision total knees done for extensor problems frequently require reoperation

We retrospectively reviewed 361 patients who had a revision total knee arthroplasty done for an extensor mechanism problem to assess the prevalence, etiology, and risk factors for subsequent reoperation. The prevalence of reoperation was 23% because 84 patients were reoperated on one or more times. The average time to the first reoperation was 2.4 years. The total number of reoperations was 127 with 58 patients reoperated on once, 15 reoperated on twice, and 11 reoperated on three or more times. The cumulative risk of a reoperation for any reason after index revision was 7% at 1 year, 19.6% at 5 years, and 35.9% at 10 years. The most common reason for reoperation was a new or recurrent patellofemoral problem, which accounted for 33% of the first reoperations. The risk of reoperation was substantially lower for patients that had femoral or tibial component malrotation corrected at the time of revision TKA. The risk of reoperation after revision TKA for an extensor mechanism complication increased in patients operated on in the 1990s compared with patients operated on in the 1970s and 1980s.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level-IV-1 (case series). See the Guidelines for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Revision of the patella with deficient bone using a biconvex component

Revision surgery on a failed patellar component can be difficult because of deficient residual bone that may compromise the functional outcome of the revision. We reviewed 20 knees in 20 patients in whom the residual patellar bone was less than 10 mm at the time of revision and used the Genesis Biconvex Patella implant to reconstruct the patella. The patients were followed up for an average of 34 months (range, 24-65 months), and were followed up clinically and radiographically by Knee Society criteria. Patellar revisions and complications were noted and standard radiographic studies to ascertain radiolucent lines and patella/patellar component thickness were evaluated. The Knee Society Scores improved from an average of 45 points to 89 points. Function scores improved from an average of 47 points to 65 points. None of the patients has required revision surgery and no patellar fractures have been seen. Radiographs showed complete lucencies at the cement-bone interface in two knees. The mean residual central patella bone thickness was 6.5 mm and the average postoperative composite thickness was 14.5 mm. The data indicate that the use of the Genesis Biconvex Patella implant is a satisfactory method of treating revision of the patella when there is major bone deficiency.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective study, Level IV-1 (case study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A modular prosthesis for patellofemoral arthroplasty: design and initial results

This study was designed to determine if a new and modular prosthesis for patellofemoral arthroplasty would produce results at least as good as those reported for other designs, while simultaneously eliminating the risks of patellar revision should total knee arthroplasty be needed in the future. Another issue was its suitability for the older patient with isolated patellofemoral arthritis in order to avoid destruction of the normal femoro-tibial compartments involved in total knee arthroplasty. Finally, I sought information about the safety and longevity of this prosthesis when used for patellofemoral arthroplasty in severely disabled patients too young to be considered for total knee replacement. From a cohort of 16 patients (8 studied retrospectively and 8 prospectively), aged 26 to 81 years, and followed up for 2.75-6.25 years, 15 (94%) rated their results excellent or good using the Activities of Daily Living Scale. These results are better than previously reported for other prosthetic designs. To date, no patient in this study group has required conversion to a total knee arthroplasty. The design has proven safe for use in both the older and younger patient, but longer followup will be needed to assess greater longevity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Study, Level IV-8 (case series--no, or historical control group). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early results with a total patellofemoral joint replacement arthroplasty prosthesis

This report concerns a new prosthesis for total patellofemoral joint replacement. Patients severely disabled due to isolated patellofemoral arthritis in whom all other treatment options had been tried and failed, or were not indicated, became candidates for this surgery. Fifteen patients met these criteria and were followed an average of 3.75 years (range: 2.25-5.5 years). Using the Activities of Daily Living Scale, 14 of 15 patients (93%) had excellent (85%-100%) or good (75%-84%) results, and 1 was fair (65%-74%).

Isolated patellar revisions for failed metal-backed components: 2- to 9-year follow-up

Results of isolated patellar revisions for failed metal-backed patellae remain controversial. Isolated patellar revisions from April 1993 to April 2000 were assessed for complication rates, the Knee Society score (KSS), implant survival, and radiological loosening. Twenty-nine knees were revised in patients aged 71.0 years (range, 61-87; SD, 6.2). At 67.0 months (range, 24-98 months; SD, 22.0), no patient underwent further revision. Knee scores improved by 26.5 (range, 9.0-44.0; SD, 10.9) while function scores improved by 25.0 (range, 0-50.0; SD,14.5) over prerevision values. Early complications included 3 superficial wound infections, 1 hematoma, and a urinary tract infection in 1 patient. One patient had a subluxed patella. One patient had asymptomatic femoral osteolysis on radiological evaluation. Isolated patellar revisions can be performed in low-demand, elderly patients with minimal patellar maltracking.

Patellar options in revision total knee arthroplasty

There are numerous options that need to be considered by the surgeon at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One needs to consider the reason for the revision, the type of patella in place, and the length of time the patella has been in place. The surgeon also needs to consider the status of the patellar bone stock, the stability of the patellar component (well-fixed or loose), and the component type (cemented or metal-backed). Assuming that the existing prosthesis is not metal-backed and has minimal PE wear, then it is preferable to retain a well-fixed all-PE cemented patellar button. However, if the button is metal-backed, then it probably is best to remove the button and replace it with an all-PE domed patellar component. Assuming more than 8 mm of patellar bone stock is remaining, it usually is best to cement an all-PE dome-shaped patella. However, if less than 8 mm is remaining, then that patient can be left with a patelloplasty, recognizing that this individual is going to continue with a high likelihood of anterior knee pain, subluxation, and poor functional results. In that situation, it may be preferable to consider a bone stock augmentation.