Intraoperative anaphylactic shock associated with bacitracin irrigation during revision total knee arthroplasty. A case report

A Review of Surgical Irrigation Solutions for Infection Prevention in Orthopaedic Surgery

» Intraoperative surgical irrigation is a common practice in orthopaedic procedures, although there is no universally established standard of care due to a lack of concrete data supporting an optimal irrigation agent.» Isotonic normal saline has long been considered a safe and cost effective solution for wound irrigation as compared with other antibiotic and antiseptic irrigation solutions.» Currently, the only adjunct to saline that is formally supported by American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and World Health Organization is povidone-iodine.» Further in vivo clinical studies are needed to identify the ideal irrigation solution that carries low cytotoxic effects while also exerting optimal antimicrobial properties.

Concepts in wound irrigation of open fractures: 'Where we came from, and where are we now?

Wound irrigation is described as the flow of a solution through an exposed fracture surface to reduce the microbial colonization, to remove apparent foreign particles and wound exudates. . While recent literature and various in-vitro and in-vivo trials have cleared some clouds of doubt from the mind, it still remains a topic of debate. Normal saline remains the standard irrigation solution as it is non tissue toxic and has the same tonicity as body fluids. The quantity and duration of washing though is not standardized and is the surgeon's choice. This adds to the dilemma in the minds of the surgeon, with the timing of the debridement and the duration of wound irrigation depending on the surgeon's discretion. Future studies should aim to regulate the duration of the wound irrigation besides guiding about the ideal fluid volume to be used for the irrigation. Further, secondary end-points like the duration of hospital stay, rate of infections and use of hospital resources, should be computed to know about the adequacy of the wound debridement and irrigation. Antimicrobial solutions can kill microorganisms in the wound but are toxic to the host tissues as well, which limits their use. In addition, pulsatile (high pressure) lavage has not been seen to increase overall effectiveness. Recent research trials have found cumulative use of innovative solutions like phenols and EDTA along with enzymes to be encouraging though large randomized controlled trials are lacking.

What Is the Optimal Irrigation Solution in the Management of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections?

BACKGROUND

Thorough irrigation and debridement using an irrigation solution is a well-established treatment for both acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). In the absence of concrete data, identifying the optimal irrigation agent and protocol remains challenging.

METHODS

A thorough review of the current literature on the various forms of irrigations and their additives was performed to evaluate the efficacy and limitations of each solution as pertaining to pathogen eradication in the treatment of PJI. As there is an overall paucity of high-quality literature comparing irrigation additives to each other and to any control, no meta-analyses could be performed. The literature was therefore summarized in this review article to give readers concise information on current irrigation options and their known risks and benefits.

RESULTS

Antiseptic solutions include povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, hypochlorous acid, and preformulated commercially available combination solutions. The current literature suggests that intraoperative use of antiseptic irrigants may play a role in treating PJI, but definitive clinical studies comparing antiseptic to no antiseptic irrigation are lacking. Furthermore, no clinical head-to-head comparisons of different antiseptic irrigants have identified an optimal irrigation solution.

CONCLUSION

Further high-quality studies on the optimal irrigation additive and protocol for the management of PJI are warranted to guide future evidence-based decisions.

Wound Irrigation in Orthopedic Open Fractures: A Review

Background: Management of open fractures remains a major clinical challenge because of the higher energy involved in the injury, the greater local trauma, tissue necrosis, and extensive contamination. Even though early surgical debridement was thought to be critical, limited available operative techniques have minimized surgery in favor of early antibiotic administration. No clear agreement on the surgical approach, debridement, or irrigation technique exists. Surgeons continue to argue about the use of various fluids, the appropriate pressure of irrigation, antiseptics, and other factors. The current work reviews the available data and summarizes the capabilities of modern orthopedic irrigation solutions. Methods: To delineate available research on the topic, the PubMed database was queried for the most common techniques, fluid variables, and chemical adjuvants utilized in current open fracture and wound irrigation methodologies. Modes of delivery, volume, pressure, temperature, timing, solution type, and additives are evaluated in the context of known outcomes to determine which solutions may be preferable. Results: Various methods have been described with their own advantages as well as limitations. Particular solutions may apply to specific clinical scenarios, presence of implants, and degree of tissue contamination. Desired irrigation solutions are isotonic, non-toxic, non-hemolytic, transparent, sterilizable, efficient in removing debris and pathogens, as well as affordable; however, no current irrigant achieves all these desired characteristics. Conclusions: Despite being crucial for the healing of open fractures, there is no clear gold standard for irrigation. Although there are some novel irrigation solutions, there has been a paucity of research on finding new, safer, and more effective irrigation solutions that will promote wound healing and reduce infection.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Infection Prevention

Implementation of strategies for prevention of surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection is gaining further attention. We provide an overview of the pertinent evidence-based guidelines for infection prevention from the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the second International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection. Future work is needed to ascertain clinical efficacy, optimal combinations, and the cost-effectiveness of certain measures.

Polymyxin and Bacitracin in the Irrigation Solution Provide No Benefit for Bacterial Killing in Vitro

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons add topical antibiotics to irrigation solutions assuming that this has a local effect and eliminates bacteria. However, prior studies have suggested that the addition of antibiotics to irrigation solution confers little benefit, adds cost, may potentiate anaphylactic reactions, and may contribute to antimicrobial resistance. We sought to compare the antimicrobial efficacy and cytotoxicity of an irrigation solution containing polymyxin-bacitracin with other commonly used irrigation solutions.

METHODS

Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were exposed to irrigation solutions containing topical antibiotics (500,000-U/L polymyxin and 50,000-U/L bacitracin; 1-g/L vancomycin; or 80-mg/L gentamicin), as well as commonly used irrigation solutions (saline solution 0.9%; povidone-iodine 0.3%; chlorhexidine 0.05%; Castile soap 0.45%; and sodium hypochlorite 0.125%). Following 1 and 3 minutes of exposure, surviving bacteria were manually counted. Failure to eradicate all bacteria in any of the 3 replicates was considered not effective for that respective solution. Cytotoxicity analysis in human fibroblasts, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes exposed to the irrigation solutions was performed by visualization of cell structure and was quantified by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity. Efficacy and cytotoxicity were assessed in triplicate experiments, with generalized linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Polymyxin-bacitracin, saline solution, and Castile soap at both exposure times were not effective at eradicating S. aureus or E. coli. In contrast, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and sodium hypochlorite irrigation were effective against both S. aureus and E. coli (p < 0.001). Vancomycin irrigation was effective against S. aureus but not against E. coli, whereas gentamicin irrigation showed partial efficacy against E. coli but none against S. aureus. Within fibroblasts, the greatest cytotoxicity was seen with chlorhexidine (mean [and standard error], 49.38% ± 0.80%; p < 0.0001), followed by Castile soap (33.57% ± 2.17%; p < 0.0001) and polymyxin-bacitracin (8.90% ± 1.40%). Povidone-iodine showed the least cytotoxicity of the efficacious solutions (5.00% ± 0.86%). Similar trends were seen at both exposure times and across fibroblasts, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrigation with polymyxin-bacitracin was ineffective at bacterial eradication, and statistically inferior to povidone-iodine. Chlorhexidine lavage conferred the greatest in vitro cytotoxicity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These data suggest that the addition of polymyxin-bacitracin to saline solution irrigation has little value. Given the cost and antimicrobial resistance implications, our findings, combined with prior clinical literature, provide adequate reason to avoid widespread use of antibiotics in irrigation solutions. Povidone-iodine may be a more effective and safer option.

An update on surgical and antimicrobial therapy for acute periprosthetic joint infection: new challenges for the present and the future

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that can occur following any arthroplasty procedure. Approximately half of these infections develop within the first year after arthroplasty, mainly in the first 1 to 3 months. These infections are known as early PJI. It is widely accepted that many early PJIs can be successfully managed by debridement, irrigation, and prosthetic retention, followed by a course of biofilm-effective antibiotics (debridement, antibiotics, implant retention procedure), but candidate patients should meet the requirements set down in Zimmerli's algorithm. The best antibiotic regimen for acute PJI treated without implant removal remains uncertain. Rifampin-containing regimens, when feasible, are recommended in gram-positive infections, and fluoroquinolones in gram-negative cases. The duration, dosage, and administration route of antibiotics and the use of combined therapy are matters that requires further clarification, as the current level of evidence is low and most recommendations are based on experimental data, studies in small series, and expert experience.

Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter-update 2015

This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, which represents the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Contact Dermatitis: A Practice Parameter-Update 2015." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is changing and not all recommendations will be appropriate or applicable to all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including members serving on the Joint Task Force, are authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information or interpretation of this practice parameter by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by the pharmaceutical industry in drug development or promotion. Previously published practice parameters of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters for Allergy & Immunology are available at http://www.JCAAI.org or http://www.allergyparameters.org.

Antibiotic allergy: immunochemical and clinical considerations

Antibiotics are among the most widely and heavily prescribed drugs, but despite this, allergic reactions to most groups of antibiotics are relatively uncommon-especially when compared with the number and frequency of type 1 hypersensitivity responses to the beta-lactams (ie, penicillins, cephalosporins, and, to a lesser extent, carbopenems). Still, there remains a steady flow of reports of allergic reactions to some topically used antibiotics (eg, rifamycin SV and bacitracin). Moreover, aminoglycosides (eg, neomycin and gramicidin) may be implicated more often than previously suspected. Despite advances in our understanding of the structural basis of the allergenicity of beta-lactam antibiotics, the insights have not readily transferred into routine use to improve diagnoses of reactions to individual penicillins and cephalosporins. This remains a challenge in drug allergy, as does the need for further chemical, immunologic, and clinical research on cephalosporin breakdown products and the so-called multiple antibiotic allergy syndrome.

Irrigation of the wounds in open fractures

Modern principles for the treatment of open fractures include stabilisation of the bone and management of the soft tissues. Wound debridement and irrigation is thought to be the mainstay in reducing the incidence of infection. Although numerous studies on animals and humans have focused on the type of irrigation performed, little is known of the factors which influence irrigation. This paper evaluates the evidence, particularly with regard to additives and the mode of delivery of irrigation fluid.

Normal saline should be used and although many antiseptics and antibiotics have been employed, no consensus has been reached as to the ideal additive. Despite the advocates of high-pressure methods highlighting the improved dilutional ability of such techniques, the results are inconclusive and these irrigation systems are not without complications.

New systems for debridement are currently being investigated, and an ideal method has yet to be determined.

Intraoperative anaphylaxis to bacitracin during pacemaker change and laser lead extraction

BACKGROUND

Bacitracin is widely used in operating rooms to soak implants, irrigate compound fractures, and apply to surgical incisions. However, bacitracin is a known sensitizer and causes not only allergic contact dermatitis but also anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a 72-year-old woman with anaphylaxis after irrigation and packing of an infected pacemaker pocket with a bacitracin solution.

METHODS

Skin prick testing to bacitracin and latex; serum tryptase, serum histamine, serum IgE to latex, and serial cardiac enzyme measurements; blood cultures, transthoracic echocardiograms, and venograms were performed to characterize the reaction.

RESULTS

Six hours after the anaphylactic event, the patient had an elevated serum tryptase level of 49 ng/mL (reference range, 2-10 ng/mL), which normalized the next morning. She had immediate-type skin prick test reactions to full-strength bacitracin ointment (500 U/g) and bacitracin solution (150 U/mL). Serum IgE level to latex was undetectable, and results of skin testing to latex were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first case report of anaphylaxis to bacitracin during pacemaker surgery. This case illustrates that intraoperative anaphylaxis to bacitracin can be life-threatening.

Salvage of infected cartilage grafts for nasal reconstruction with a through-and-through irrigation system

Development of a wound infection after nasal reconstruction can place the entire reconstructive effort in jeopardy. The approach to management in these cases has traditionally entailed wound drainage, removal of involved graft material, and debridement of nonvital tissue. Following adequate wound healing, delayed reconstruction is then performed, with the final result often compromised in form and function. We present a case of a postoperative wound infection following reconstruction of a traumatic nasal deformity utilizing autologous cartilage grafts. Treatment consisted of hospitalization with administration of culture-specific parenteral antibiotics and continuous through-and-through antibiotic irrigation of the wound via an indwelling catheter. The infection was completely eradicated and all cartilage grafts were salvaged utilizing this technique. At 3 years postoperatively, the patient has maintained the shape and quality of her reconstruction, without evidence of recurrent infection.

Epidemiology of life-threatening and lethal anaphylaxis: a review

Severe anaphylaxis is a systemic reaction affecting two or more organs or systems and is due to the release of active mediators from mast cells and basophils. A four-grade classification routinely places 'severe' anaphylaxis in grades 3 and 4 (death could be graded as grade 5). Studies are underway to determine the prevalence of severe and lethal anaphylaxis in different populations and the relative frequencies of food, drug, latex and Hymenoptera anaphylaxis. These studies will also analyse the risk arising from the lack of preventive measures applied in schools (personalized management protocols) and from the insufficient use of self-injected adrenalin. Allergy-related conditions may account for 0.2-1% of emergency consultations. Severe anaphylaxis affects 1-3 per 10 000 people, but for the United States and Australia figures are even higher. It is estimated to cause death in 0.65-2% of patients, i.e. 1-3 per million people. An increased prevalence has been revealed by monitoring hospitalized populations by reference to the international classification of disease (ICD) codes. The relative frequency of aetiological factors of allergy (food, drugs, insects and latex) varies in different studies. Food, drug and Hymenoptera allergies are potentially lethal. The risk of food-mediated anaphylaxis can be assessed from the number of personalized management protocols in French schools: 0.065%. Another means of assessment may be the rate of adrenalin prescriptions. However, an overestimation of the anaphylaxis risk may result from this method (0.95% of Canadian children). Data from the literature leads to several possibilities. First, a definition of severe anaphylaxis should be agreed. Secondly, prospective, multicentre enquiries, using ICD codes, should be implemented. Moreover, the high number of anaphylaxis cases for which the aetiology is not identified, and the variation in aetiology in the published series, indicate that a closer cooperation between emergency specialists and allergists is essential.