Prognostic Factors Affecting Union After Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy in Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Ulnar Resection Length: A Risk Factor for Nonunion in Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Nonunion rates following ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) are reported up to 18% with few known risk factors. While resection length is variable in practice, little is known about the prognostic implications on healing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether longer resection lengths increased the odds of nonunion.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent an elective USO at a single institution over a 6-year period. Demographic, social, comorbidity, and surgical data were reviewed. Ulnar resection length was obtained from operative notes and dichotomized into smaller (<5.5 mm) and larger (≥5.5 mm) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of nonunion. Univariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression model were used to assess for significant predictors of nonunion.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included with a mean age of 45 years. Patient comorbidities included 12.6% with diabetes, 29.9% with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ≥ 3, 5.8% reporting current tobacco use, and 29.9% reporting former tobacco use. There were 55 patients (63.2%) with resection lengths < 5.5 mm and 32 patients (36.8%) with ≥ 5.5 mm resections. Multivariable analysis identified longer resection length (≥5.5 mm) and current tobacco use as independent risk factors for nonunion. Patients with a resection length of ≥ 5.5 mm had 20.2 times greater odds of nonunion compared with patients with smaller resections, and current smokers had 72.2 times greater odds of nonunion compared with nonsmokers.

CONCLUSION

Longer ulnar resection length (≥5.5 mm) significantly increases the risk of nonunion following USO.

Sliding Plate System: A Novel Method and Device for Shortening Osteotomy

We report a novel sliding plate system (SPS) and its application for radial shortening osteotomy. We conceptualised, designed and introduced the SPS, which helps with precise shortening osteotomy in both radius and ulna. We implanted the SPS in a patient with Kienböck disease following a radius shortening osteotomy. The SPS was safe and efficient, and the surgical technique eliminated extra steps. The SPS affords precise shortening, optimum compression and anatomic alignment after radius shortening osteotomy. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Is ulnar shortening osteotomy or the wafer procedure better for ulnar impaction syndrome?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Wrist pain on the ulnar side is often caused by ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). Idiopathic UIS requires surgical treatment when conservative treatment fails. The 2 main surgical procedures used are the wafer procedure and ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) of the metaphysis or diaphysis. This review aimed to analyze comparative studies of the 2 procedures in UIS to determine clinical outcomes and complications.

METHODS

One prospective and 5 retrospective comparison trials were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes were treatment effectiveness; pain visual analog scale (VAS), disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Mayo wrist, and Darrow scores. The incidence of postoperative complications formed the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The selected studies included 107 patients who underwent the wafer procedure (G1) and 117 patients who underwent USO (G2). The wafer procedure had the benefits of less postoperative immobilization and an early return to work. However, there were no significant differences in the postoperative pain improvement and functional scores. All 6 studies reported high total complication rates and reoperation with USO. The most frequent complication was implant-related discomfort or irritation; subsequent plate removal was the most common reason for a secondary operation.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in pain improvement or the postoperative functional score between the groups. Nevertheless, postoperative complications were the major pitfalls of USO. As the specialized shortening system advances further, a high-level study will be necessary to determine the surgical option in UIS.

Is metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy superior to diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (MUSO) is safer for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) than diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DUSO), DUSO is widely used for UIS treatment.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of DUSO and MUSO for UIS treatment and determine the factors that should be considered when choosing surgical treatment for UIS.

METHODS

Articles comparing the effectiveness of DUSO and MUSO for UIS treatment were systematically retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The demography, incidence of complications, secondary operation rate, postoperative DASH score, wrist pain on the visual analogue scale, and grip strength improvement were also evaluated. In addition, the correlation between the improvement of grip strength and the shortening of osteotomy length of ulna was analyzed. The outcome of the patient was discontinuous, and the odds ratio, risk ratio (RR), and 95%CI were calculated and analyzed via RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

Six studies, including 83 patients receiving MUSO (experimental group) and 112 patients receiving DUSO (control group), were included in the meta-analysis. The second operation rate was significantly higher after DUSO than after MUSO. The DASH scores were slightly lower in the MUSO group than in the DUSO group. The patients receiving MUSO had slightly better pain relief effect than patients receiving DUSO. However, the incidence of complications and improvement of grip strength were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although DUSO and MUSO provide similar effects for UIS, MUSO is associated with a lower secondary operation rate, slightly lower postoperative DASH scores and slightly better pain relief effect than DUSO, indicating that MUSO can effectively be used for UIS treatment.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for posttraumatic ulnar impaction syndrome in adolescent (younger than 18 years) - Based on the Cha & Shin assessment

PURPOSE

We performed ordinary ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) in patients younger than 18 years old with secondary ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) after traumatic events. Here, we report the clinical and radiologic outcomes with a review of the previous literature through a retrospective case series.

METHODS

Twenty-two adolescents treated by USOs from 2006 to 2018 were investigated. The amount of shortening was classified into three categories. The first category was for a still open physis on the medial half of the radius in those younger than 15. In this category, we osteotomized the ulna for the physis level to be left neutral or negative by 1-2 mm. The second category had no growth potency in the radius. If the patient was younger than 15, we considered only residual growth of the ulna, thus performing USO for the ordinary UV to be negative by 2-3 mm. For patients aged 15-18 years old, if growth potency was nearly absent in the ulna, we performed traditional USO with a neutral ulnar variance (UV).

RESULTS

Categories 1, 2, and 3 for the amount of USO were determined for 4, 4, and 14 patients, respectively. All USOs properly healed without substantial complications. The mean preoperative UV was 2.91 mm, and the final value decreased to 0.23 with statistical significance (p < 0.001). The range of wrist motion was improved after USO from 133.86° and 132.73° to 154.77° and 160.68° (all, p < 0.001 in flexion-extension and pronation-supination arcs, respectively). The preoperative VAS and MMWS scores also improved from 2.77 to 75.00 to 0.18 and 88.86, respectively, at the final follow-up (all, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

UIS in adolescent populations after trauma in their children/younger adolescents could be properly treated by USO. Even with an open physis at the ulna, neutral UVs could be achieved, and the clinical outcomes were satisfactory. However, long-term follow-up is still needed regarding TFCC and DRUJ status.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Results of isolated ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impaction syndrome

The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of isolated ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy (USSO) in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome. This was a two-center retrospective study. All patients older than 18 years who underwent isolated USSO for idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome between 2006 and 2016 were included. The outcome measures were: patient satisfaction, decrease in pain intensity, change in occupation, QuickDASH and PRWE functional scores, secondary palliative surgery suggesting failure of the ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy, and postoperative ulnar variance. The main complications were analyzed. Thirty-one patients were included. Twenty-six (84%) were satisfied with the procedure. At an average follow-up of 62 months, there was no secondary palliative surgery. Mean pain intensity on VAS was 7/10 (range, 2-10) and 1.7/10 (range, 0-6) preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively, for a mean decrease of 5.3 ± 2.6 points; this decrease was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001). None of the manual workers had to alter their work. Mean postoperative QuickDASH score was 19.6/100 (range, 0-79.55) and mean postoperative PRWE score was 23/100 (range, 1-85). Mean postoperative ulnar variance was -0.5 mm. As for complications, 61% of patients (n = 19/31) had discomfort related to the plate; 9.7% (n = 3/31) had distal radioulnar osteoarthritis; 4% (n = 1/19) had a fracture after hardware removal; 13% (n = 4/31) had non-union. Despite a high rate of complications, the study confirmed the effectiveness, in terms of pain, of isolated USSO in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort.

Long-term outcomes after ulna shortening osteotomy: a mean follow-up of six years

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to describe long-term patient-reported outcomes after ulna shortening osteotomy for ulna impaction syndrome.

Methods

Overall, 89 patients treated between July 2011 and November 2017 who had previously taken part in a routine outcome evaluation up to 12 months postoperatively were sent an additional questionnaire in February 2021. The primary outcome was the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) total score. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with treatment results, complications, and subsequent treatment for ulnar-sided wrist pain. Linear mixed models were used to compare preoperative, 12 months, and late follow-up (ranging from four to nine years) PRWHE scores.

Results

Long-term outcomes were available in 66 patients (74%) after a mean follow-up of six years (SD 1). The mean PRWHE total score improved from 63 before surgery to 19 at late follow-up (difference in means (Δ) 44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 39 to 50; p = <0.001). Between 12 months and late follow-up, the PRWHE total score also improved (Δ 12; 95% CI 6 to 18; p = < 0.001). At late follow-up, 14/66 of patients (21%) reported a PRWHE total score of zero, whereas this was 3/51 patients (6%) at 12 months (p = 0.039). In all, 58/66 patients (88%) would undergo the same treatment again under similar circumstances. Subsequent treatment (total n = 66; surgical n = 57) for complications or recurrent symptoms were performed in 50/66 patients (76%). The most prevalent type of reoperation was hardware removal in 42/66 (64%), and nonunion occurred in 8/66 (12%).

Conclusion

Ulna shortening osteotomy improves patient-reported pain and function that seems to sustain at late follow-up. While satisfaction levels are generally high, reoperations such as hardware removal are common.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(5):375–382.

The association of three anatomical factors with ulnar-sided wrist pain: a radiological study

BACKGROUND

Ulnar-sided wrist pain is associated with the development of multiple wrist pathologies. But the anatomical etiologies have not been fully understood.

PURPOSE

To determine the association of three anatomical factors with ulnar-sided wrist pain, including ulnar variance (UV), distal ulnar volar angle (DUVA), and pisiform-ulnar distance (PUD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 64 patients who had ulnar-sided wrist pain associated with training injuries were retrospectively studied. A control group included 64 healthy athletes from the same unit. The UV, DUVA, and PUD of each individual was measured on radiographs.

RESULTS

The average UV and DUVA of those in the ulnar-sided pain group were 0.84 mm and 174.65°, respectively; the control group values were 0.39 mm and 175.11°. The differences between the two groups had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). The average PUD of the ulnar-sided wrist pain group was shorter than that of the control group (2.37 cm vs. 2.65 cm); the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05). PUD had a negative correlation with ulnar-sided pain; it was an anatomical protective factor (odds ratio = 0.01; P < 0.00; 95% confidence interval=0.00-0.05). Both UV and DUVA had no significant correlations with ulnar-sided wrist pain (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PUD has a significant correlation with ulnar-sided wrist pain. It is the anatomical protective factor. Both the UV and DUVA have no statistical association with ulnar-sided wrist pain, but we cannot ignore their potential pathogenic effects on wrists, and further studies are needed to confirm the results.

Outcomes of ulna shortening osteotomy: a cohort analysis of 106 patients

Background

Ulna shortening osteotomy (USO) for ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) aims to improve pain and function by unloading the ulnar carpus. Previous studies often lack validated patient-reported outcomes or have small sample sizes. The primary objective of this study was to investigate patient-reported pain and hand function at 12 months after USO for UIS. Secondary objectives were to investigate the active range of motion, grip strength, complications, and whether outcomes differed based on etiology.

Materials and methods

We report on 106 patients with UIS who received USO between 2012 and 2019. In 44 of these patients, USO was performed secondary to distal radius fracture. Pain and function were measured with the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Active range of motion and grip strength were measured before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Complications were scored using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Complications in Hand and Wrist conditions (ICHAW) tool.

Results

The PRWHE total score improved from a mean of 64 (SD = 18) before surgery to 40 (22) at 3 months and 32 (23) at 12 months after surgery (P  < 0.001; effect size Cohen’s d = −1.4). There was no difference in the improvement in PRWHE total score (P = 0.99) based on etiology. Also, no clinically relevant changes in the active range of motion were measured. Independent of etiology, mean grip strength improved from 24 (11) before surgery to 30 (12) at 12 months (P  = 0.001). Sixty-four percent of patients experienced at least one complication, ranging from minor to severe. Of the 80 complications in total, 50 patients (47%) had complaints of hardware irritation, of which 34 (32%) had their hardware removed. Six patients (6%) needed refixation because of nonunion.

Conclusion

We found beneficial outcomes in patients with UIS that underwent USO, although there was a large variance in the outcome and a relatively high number of complications (which includes plate removals). Results of this study may be used in preoperative counseling and shared decision-making when considering USO.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10195-021-00621-8.

Ulnocarpal Impaction

Ulnocarpal impaction syndrome is a common cause for ulnarsided wrist pain caused by an abutment between the ulnar head and the lunotriquetral complex. This pain is typically triggered by load bearing and rotation of the forearm. Radiographic examination is often associated with positive ulnar variance and cysts in the lunate, edema of the ulnoproximal lunate is shown in MRI. Operative treatment aims to reduce load on the lunate, either by open ulnar shortening osteotomy or arthroscopic wafer procedure.

The Combined Procedure of Ulnar Metaphyseal Shortening Osteotomy With Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Knotless Repair

Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear are common causes of ulnar-sided wrist pain. As a standard surgical treatment, ulnar-shortening osteotomy (USO) and TFCC repair are used respectively. Patient spectrums of UIS accompanied by distal radioulnar joint instability or traumatic TFCC foveal tear with UIS symptoms exist, and both USO and TFCC repair are necessary for treating some of these patients. However, there have been few reports on the procedure for performing these 2 operations concurrently. We introduce a combined procedure to concurrently perform USO and TFCC repair. We performed a USO in the ulnar metaphysis using a locking plate and open TFCC knotless repair using a suture anchor at the ulnar fovea. In this technique, USO is conducted in the metaphysis, which is favorable to union, using a small plate that is easy to handle, and knotless TFCC repair can be performed simultaneously through a single small incision.

Refracture after plate removal following ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome - a retrospective case-control study

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Inevitable nonunion after ulnar shortening osteotomy in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome and breast cancer under bisphosphonate treatment

BACKGROUND

Nonunion after ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) was observed at a high rate in patients undergoing long-term bisphosphonate (BP) maintenance treatment after breast cancer surgery. Here, we report the unique features of these nonunions.

METHODS

In total, 485 patients who had undergone USO between March 2008 and September 2017 were screened for inclusion based on the following criteria: (1) definitive nonunion after USO; (2) prior history of or ongoing BP therapy after the diagnosis of breast cancer; and (3) no evidence of metastasis in the ulna treated with USO, as determined based on the radiological evaluation.

RESULTS

Five patients with histories of breast cancer and subsequent BP treatment were identified; all (100%) of these patients showed definitive nonunion after USO. The mean age was 56.2 years, and all ulnae were on the contralateral side to that of the original breast cancer. Intravenous Ibandronate^® and Zolendronate^® were administrated to one and four patients, respectively. The mean period of administration was 67.8 months. Three patients exhibited suspicious lesions impending atypical fracture on their femurs, and the other two patients were treated by intramedullary nailing after the occurrence of atypical fractures. Radiological evaluation revealed no evidence of a metastatic lesion, including in the musculoskeletal system, in any patient. Osteosynthesis was performed with cancellous iliac bone graft and mean of 4.3 months after osteosynthesis, union in all cases was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Problems associated with BP treatment are well known. Even in cases in which the agent is essential for preventing bony metastasis of breast cancer, the normal bony physiology, including bone turnover and healing, is likely to be compromised. In addition to atypical fractures of the femur and ulna, procedures such as USO are likely to be affected by BP. Furthermore, not only a primary iliac bone graft but also other method (oblique osteotomy) should be needed to avoid nonunion during plating in USO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Retrospective case series.

Nonunion and Reoperation After Ulna Shortening Osteotomy

Background: The primary purpose of our study was to identify factors associated with reoperation after ulna shortening osteotomy. Our secondary aims were to determine the rate and type of reoperation procedures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients older than 18 years of age who underwent an ulna shortening osteotomy between January 2003 and December 2015. Medical records of patients were assessed for our explanatory variables, reoperations, and reporting of symptoms. We used bivariate and multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with reoperation after ulna shortening osteotomy. Results: Among 94 patients who underwent 98 ulna shortening osteotomies, there were 34 reoperations (35%). Nineteen patients (19%) underwent removal of hardware, 6 (6.1%) had a nonunion, and 9 (9.2%) underwent additional surgeries. Surgery on their dominant limb, trauma, and prior surgery to the ipsilateral wrist were associated with reoperation. In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with reoperation were the dominant side being affected (odds ratio = 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36-11) and traumatic origin (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.1-11). Bivariate analysis identified younger age and prior surgery of the affected wrist as factors associated with hardware removal. More operations for refixation due to nonunion of osteotomy were performed in patients with a transverse osteotomy compared with patients with an oblique osteotomy. Conclusions: One in 3 patients will undergo a reoperation after ulna shortening osteotomy, most often due to hardware irritation or nonunion of osteotomy. Awareness of these rates and predictive factors may be helpful for preoperative discussions and surgical decision making.

Determinants of Pain and Predictors of Pain Relief after Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Background  The purpose of this study is to characterize patient- and surgery-specific factors associated with perioperative pain level in patients undergoing ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) for ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). We hypothesize that preoperative opiate consumption, tobacco utilization, and severity of ulnar variance will be associated with less postoperative pain relief. Methods  All cases of USO between January 2010 and December 2016 for management of UIS were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, smoking status, type of labor, and opioid utilization before surgery were recorded. Radiographic measurements for ulnar variance, radial tilt and inclination, as well as triangular fibrocartilage complex and distal radial-ulnar joint (DRUJ) morphology were assessed. Pre- and postoperative pain score were recorded. Regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of pain scores. Results  A total of 69 patients were included for the final analysis with a mean age of 44 years (range 17-73 years). Seventeen patients reported use of daily opioid medications at the time of surgery (25%). Patients who used opioid analgesics daily, active laborers, smokers, and patients involved in worker compensation claims had significantly less pain relief after surgery. Patients with osteotomy performed at the metaphysis had significantly more pain relief than patients that had diaphyseal osteotomy. Regression analysis identified tobacco utilization and anatomic site of osteotomy as independent predictors of postoperative pain. Conclusion  The results from this study identified smoking and location of osteotomy as independent predictors of postoperative pain relief. While smoking cessation is paramount to prevent delayed/nonunion it may also help improve pain relief following USO. The potential to achieve greater shortening with a metaphyseal osteotomy suggests that in addition to the mechanical unloading the carpus, pain relief after USO may also stem from tensioning the ulnar collateral ligaments of the wrist, the ECU subsheath, and the radioulnar ligaments. Level of Evidence  This is a Level III, therapeutic study.

Intra-Articular Distal Ulnar Sliding Osteotomy for Ulnar Shortening

Background

Ulnocarpal impaction is the most common reason to perform ulnar shortening osteotomy. There are 3 osteotomy techniques for ulnar shortening: transverse, step-cut, and oblique cut^1-3.First described by Milch⁴ in 1941, extra-articular diaphyseal oblique or transverse shortening is the most frequently performed type of shortening. However, it is associated with a nonunion rate of up to 10%, and irritation by implants requiring removal occurs in up to 28% of cases^5,6. Intra-articular procedures such as the wafer procedure affect the distal ulnar joint surface, which can lead to stiffness of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) due to scar tissue formation and adhesion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC)⁷. Lapner et al.⁸ described increased pressure in the DRUJ after the wafer procedure, which may lead to an early onset of osteoarthritis. Complication rates between 8% for open wafer procedures and 21% for arthroscopic wafer procedures have been described⁹.Intra-articular shortening has also been described by Slade and Gillon¹⁰ in 2007 and Hammert et al.¹¹ in 2012 and was tested in cadavers by Greenberg et al.¹² in 2013. This closing wedge technique preserves the distal joint surface of the ulna and also allows for easy correction of the inclination of the hub joint surface of the ulna.In contrast to the technique of Slade, our described osteotomy is steeper and longer proximally, which allows for fixation with >2 screws^13-16. Rapid healing of the metaphyseal bone compared with diaphyseal bone is described, and implant removal is necessary less often^14,17,18.With the described procedure, the interosseous membrane remains untouched, especially the distal oblique bundle, which additionally provides stability of the DRUJ in 40% of patients¹⁹.

Description

A dorso-ulnar approach through the fifth extensor sheath is performed. The ulnocarpal joint and the DRUJ are accessed through an arthrotomy distal and proximal to the TFCC. The foveal attachment of the TFCC and the subsheath of the sixth extensor sheath are visualized. The osteotomy is intra-articular oblique from distal ulnar to proximal radial. Sliding the head of the ulna proximally achieves the desired shortening of up to 5 mm, and the head is fixed using 2, 3, or 4 cannulated headless screws. A slight correction of the axis of the ulnar head is also possible.

Alternatives

An alternative to this procedure is extra-articular osteotomy using a palmar or dorsal ulnar approach. If necessary, additional ulnocarpal procedures can be performed in an open or arthroscopically assisted manner.

Rationale

The shortening takes place only in the articular part of the distal aspect of the ulna. This procedure can easily be combined with TFCC repair, synovectomy of the DRUJ, or repair or reconstruction of the lunotriquetral ligament if needed. Shortening of up to 5 mm is possible.

Chronic Longitudinal Instability of the Forearm Treated With a Combination of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy, Pronator Teres Transfer, and Tightrope Technique

Restoration of longitudinal stability of the forearm continues to pose a difficult challenge for the hand surgeon, and no technique has demonstrated success above others. Longitudinal stability to the forearm is conferred by 3 structures: the radial head, which acts as a primary stabilizer, the interosseous membrane, more specifically, the central band and, the distal radioulnar ligaments which are part of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. A combination of techniques is described in this article to address chronic longitudinal instability of the forearm: (1) ulnar shortening osteotomy to restore ulnar variance, (2) pronator teres transfer was used to reconstruct the central band of the interosseous membrane, and (3) tightrope augmentation was used to prevent elongation during the healing process.

Association Between Distal Radial Fracture Malunion and Patient-Reported Activity Limitations: A Long-Term Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The long-term effect of distal radial fracture malunion on activity limitations is unknown. Between 2001 and 2002, we conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients with distal radial fracture treated with casting or percutaneous fixation in northeast Scania in Sweden. In that original study, the patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire at baseline and at 2 years. We performed a long-term follow-up study of patients who were 18 to 65 years of age at the time of the fracture to investigate the association between fracture malunion and activity limitations.

METHODS

In this long-term follow-up, patients who had participated in the original study completed the DASH questionnaire and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and for satisfaction (scored, 0 [best] to 100) and underwent radiographic and physical examinations at 12 to 14 years after the fracture. We defined malunion as dorsal angulation of ≥10°, ulnar variance of ≥3 mm, and/or radial inclination of ≤15°. We also assessed the presence of radiocarpal osteoarthritis and ulnar styloid nonunion. The primary outcome was the change in DASH score from baseline. Secondary outcomes were DASH, pain, and satisfaction scores, wrist range of motion, and grip strength at the time of the follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 85 eligible patients, 63 (74%) responded to the questionnaires and underwent examinations. Malunion was found in 25 patients, osteoarthritis was found in 38 patients, and styloid nonunion was found in 9 patients. Compared with patients without malunion, those with malunion had significantly worse DASH scores from baseline to 12 to 14 years (p = 0.002); the adjusted mean difference was 11 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 17 points). Similarly, follow-up scores were significantly worse among patients with malunion; the adjusted mean difference was 14 points (95% CI, 7 to 22 points; p < 0.001) for DASH scores, 10 points (95% CI, 0 to 20 points; p = 0.049) for VAS pain scores, and 26 points (95% CI, 11 to 41 points; p = 0.001) for VAS satisfaction scores. No differences were found in range of motion or grip strength. Osteoarthritis (mostly mild) and styloid nonunion had no significant association (p > 0.05) with DASH scores, VAS pain or satisfaction scores, or grip strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who sustain a distal radial fracture at the age of 18 to 65 years and develop malunion are more likely to have worse long-term outcomes including activity limitations and pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Late Reconstruction of the Interosseous Membrane with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft for Chronic Essex-Lopresti Injuries: Outcomes with a Mean Follow-up of Over 10 Years

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to report our long-term outcomes following reconstruction of the forearm interosseous membrane (IOM) with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft for treatment of chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries.

METHODS

We identified 33 patients who underwent IOM reconstruction with BPTB graft for chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries over a 20-year treatment interval. Twenty male and 13 female patients, with a mean age of 42.1 years (range, 19 to 73 years) and a minimum follow-up interval of 5 years, were included. Preinjury clinical examination and radiographic measurements were obtained from records for comparison with prospectively collected data. Additional functional outcome data collected postoperatively included QuickDASH (an abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]), modified Mayo wrist (MMW), and Broberg-Morrey elbow function scores.

RESULTS

IOM reconstruction was performed at a mean interval (and standard deviation) of 44.9 ± 60.0 months (range, 6.4 to 208 months) from the time of the initial injury. At a mean follow-up of 10.9 ± 4.4 years (range, 5.5 to 24.2 years), significant improvements were observed in mean elbow flexion-extension arc (+13° [95% confidence interval (CI), 4° to 22°]; p = 0.005), wrist flexion-extension arc (+19° [95% CI, 4° to 34°]; p = 0.016), forearm pronation-supination (+23° [95% CI, 8° to 39°]; p = 0.004), and grip strength (+25% of that of the contralateral side [95% CI, 18% to 32% of contralateral side]; p < 0.001). Improvements in ulnar variance were sustained over the long term from +3.9 mm (95% CI, 3.2 to 4.6 mm) preoperatively to -1.6 mm (95% CI, -2.3 to -0.9 mm) immediately postoperatively and -1.1 mm (95% CI, -1.8 to -0.4 mm) at the time of the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean QuickDASH, MMW, and Broberg-Morrey scores were 29.8 (range, 5 to 61), 82.7 (range, 60 to 100), and 91.6 (range, 64 to 100), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IOM reconstruction with a BPTB graft is an effective treatment option for chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries, with satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes over the long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.