Patients Reporting Outcomes: Are We Getting It Right?: Commentary on an article by Frederick A. Matsen III, MD, et al.: "Relationship Between Patient-Reported Assessment of Shoulder Function and Objective Range-of-Motion Measurements"

Syndesmotic Suture Button Fixation Results in Higher Tegner Activity Scale Scores When Compared to Screw Fixation: A Multicenter Investigation

BACKGROUND

Suture buttons and metal screws have been used and compared in biomechanical, radiographic, and clinical outcome studies for syndesmotic injuries, with neither implant demonstrating clear superiority. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of both implants.

METHODS

Patients who underwent syndesmosis fixation at 2 separate academic centers from 2010 through 2017 were compared. Thirty-one patients treated with a suture button and 21 patients treated with screws were included. Patients in each group were matched by age, sex, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture classification. Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), patient satisfaction score, surgical failure, and reoperation rates were compared.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent suture button fixation had significantly higher TAS scores than those who underwent screw fixation (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in FAAM ADL scores between cohorts (p = 0.08). Symptomatic hardware removal rates were similar (3.2% suture button cohort vs 9.0% in screw cohort). One patient (4.5%) underwent revision surgery secondary to syndesmotic malreduction after screw fixation, for a reoperation rate of 13.5%.

CONCLUSION

Patients with unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with suture button fixation had higher mean TAS scores compared to patients treated with screws. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and ADL scores in these cohorts were similar.Level of Evidence: Level 3 Retrospective Matched Case-Cohort.

Ankle fractures: High implant cost is not associated with better patient reported outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Ankle fractures comprise 9% of all fractures and are among the most common fractures requiring operative management. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screws is the gold standard for the treatment of unstable, displaced ankle fractures. While performing ORIF, orthopaedic surgeons may choose from several fixation methods including locking versus nonlocking plating and whether to use screws or suture buttons for syndesmotic injuries. Nearly all orthopaedic surgeons treat ankle fractures but most are unfamiliar with implant costs. No study to date has correlated the cost of ankle fracture fixation with health status as perceived by patients through patient reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between increasing implant cost and PROs after a rotational ankle fracture.

METHODS

All ankle fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) at a level I academic trauma center from January 2018 to December 2022 were identified. Inclusion criteria included all rotational ankle fractures with a minimum 6-month follow-up and completed 6-month PRO. Patients were excluded for age <18, polytrauma and open fracture. Variables assessed included demographics, fracture classifications, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL) score, implant type, and implant cost.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in cost between fracture types (p < 0.0001) with trimalleolar fractures being the most expensive. The mean FAAM-ADL score was lowest for trimalleolar fractures at 78.9, 95% CI [75.5, 82.3]. A diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia was associated with a decrease in cost of $233.3, 95% CI [-411.8, -54.8]. There was no relationship between syndesmotic fixation and implant cost, $102.6, 95% CI [-74.9, 280.0]. There was no correlation between implant cost and FAAM-ADL score at 6 months (p = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of higher cost ankle fixation does not correlate with better FAAM-ADL scores. Orthopaedic surgeons may choose less expensive implants to improve the value of ankle fixation without impacting patient reported outcomes.

Many-faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index-revised short form

Background

The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI-RS) is a foot- and ankle- patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI-RS. A multi-faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI-RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI-RS as a PROM of foot function.

Method

A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI-RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud-based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI-RS were assessed using a many-faceted Rasch analysis that included model-data fit, rating scale function, item-person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale.

Results

Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32-items from the original FFI-RS were retained. The 4-item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (-0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (-0.58 to 1.15), and person’s foot function (-6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions.

Conclusions

Many-faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI-RS had sound psychometric properties using the many-faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels.

Patient Reported Outcome Measures in the Foot and Ankle: Normative Values Do Not Reflect 100% Full Function

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to determine normative values for foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM), activities of daily living (ADL), FAAM/foot and ankle disability (FADI) Sport, Tegner activity scale, SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) in individuals who are representative of the "normal" adult population in the United States. The secondary purpose was to perform a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of ankle functional ability to provide evidence of reliability and validity of commonly used orthopaedic outcome scores. Our hypothesis was that normative values will differ based on patient characteristics and demographics, and that the selected commonly used foot and ankle outcomes scores will demonstrate acceptable reliability and validity estimates.

METHODS

There were 271 persons in this study (101 women, 170 men, average age = 31.4 (SD = 15.1) years, average BMI = 25.9 (SD = 5.9)). Age, sex and BMI were documented. Comparisons of outcome scores were made between cohorts. CFA was performed to test factor structure of ankle functional ability.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in FAAM ADL between women and men (n.s.) or FAAM Sport (n.s.). Women had significantly higher SF-12 PCS (P = 0.001). Men had significantly higher SF-12 MCS (P < 0.001) and Tegner (P = 0.024). FAAM ADL, FAAM Sport and SF-12 PCS scores were significantly higher in people who did not have previous ankle surgery. Younger people and those with lower BMI had significantly higher ankle function. Reliability was excellent, and the CFA had excellent model fit demonstrating evidence of validity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that normative values of foot and ankle outcome measures did not reflect 100% function and differed by sex, previous ankle surgery status, age and BMI. Individuals who did not have previous ankle surgery were younger, and had lower BMI and higher functional levels. Reliability was excellent, and the CFA model demonstrated excellent fit, providing evidence for validity, and lending support to use aggregated outcome measures as one scale. This study is unique in that it provides surgeons with normative ankle values in commonly reported outcome measures including the FAAM, FADI SF-12 and Tegner activity scale, in the normal population, based on BMI, age, gender and previous ankle surgery status. This information can be a very useful tool in the clinical setting for patient expectations counseling. In addition, surgeons and clinicians can feel confident using these outcome scores to assess their patients' progress through the continuum of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Rasch Analysis of Reliability and Validity of Scores From the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of scores from the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports scales in patients who have a variety of ankle injuries.

METHODS

All patients who underwent surgical treatment for an ankle injury and completed the FAAM ADL and Sport scales were included in this study (n = 456; 192 females, 264 males). The average age was 47.6 years (range, 18-79 years). The average time to follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 2.0-7.7 years). All data were collected prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. A reliability and validity analysis, utilizing the Rasch measurement model, a special case of item response theory (IRT), was conducted.

RESULTS

Reliability was very good. For FAAM ADL, person reliability was 0.87 and item reliability was 0.99. For FAAM Sport, person reliability was 0.89 and item reliability was 1.0. Infit mean square (MNSQ) values, which assess internal scale validity, were examined. For FAAM ADL, items 11 (coming up on your toes) and 10 (squatting) were high (2.27 and 2.08, respectively). All other infit values were within the acceptable range of 0.5 to 1.7. For FAAM Sport, all infit values were within the acceptable range. Outfit MNSQ values, which assess the FAAM ADL and Sport rating scale function, were examined. Three items from FAAM ADL were beyond the acceptable range. Items 10 and 11 from FAAM ADL had high outfit MNSQ values (2.15 and 1.98, respectively). Item 19 (light to moderate work) item had a marginally low outfit MNSQ of 0.48. For FAAM Sport, all outfit values were within the acceptable range.

CONCLUSION

There was very good evidence of the reliability and validity of FAAM ADL and FAAM Sport scores. Two FAAM ADL items may indicate the need for further scale development for use in a diverse surgical ankle population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.