The Demographic and Geographic Trends of Meniscal Procedures in New York State: An Analysis of 649,470 Patients Over 13 years

Higher odds of meniscectomy compared with meniscus repair in a young patient population with increased neighbourhood disadvantage

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on the management of isolated meniscus tears in young patients and to identify trends in surgical management of meniscus tears based on surgeon volume.

METHODS

Data from a large healthcare system on patients aged 14-44 years who underwent isolated meniscus surgery between 2016 and 2022 were analysed. Patient demographics, socioeconomic factors and surgeon volume were recorded. Patient age was categorised as 14-29 years and 30-44 years old. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a measure of neighbourhood disadvantage with increased ADI corresponding to more disadvantage, was grouped as <25th, 25-75th and >75th percentile. Multivariate comparisons were made between procedure groups while univariate comparisons were made between surgeon groups.

RESULTS

The study included 1552 patients treated by 84 orthopaedic surgeons. Older age and higher ADI were associated with higher odds of undergoing meniscectomy. Patients of older age and with non-private insurance were more likely to undergo treatment by a lower-volume knee surgeon. Apart from the year 2022, higher-volume knee surgeons performed significantly higher rates of meniscus repair compared with lower-volume knee surgeons. When controlling for surgeon volume, higher ADI remained a significant predictor of undergoing meniscectomy over meniscus repair.

CONCLUSION

Significant associations exist between patient factors and surgical choices for isolated meniscus tears in younger patients. Patients of older age and with increased neighbourhood disadvantage were more likely to undergo meniscectomy versus meniscus repair. While higher-volume knee surgeons favoured meniscus repair, a growing trend of meniscus repair rates was observed among lower-volume knee surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, level III.

Epidemiologic patterns of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis detection and treatment in new york state

The purpose of this study is to examine the epidemiologic trends of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) detection and treatment in New York State (NYS), including disparities in access. The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent treatment for, or were diagnosed with, AIS from 2008 to 2016. Age determined adolescence; and the surgery date, 3-digit zip code, sex, race, insurance status, institution and surgeon license number were recorded to identify such trends. The geographical distribution was assembled from an NYS shapefile, obtained from the Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing database with analysis performed using tigris R. In total 54 002 patients with AIS, 3967 of whom were surgically treated, were identified for analysis. Diagnoses spiked in 2010. Females were diagnosed and underwent surgical treatment more frequently than males. AIS was diagnosed and treated in white patients more frequently than in black and Asian patients combined. From 2010 to 2013, the patients self-paying for surgical treatment decreased more than other payment modalities. Medium-volume surgeons continually increased the number of cases performed, whereas low-volume surgeons exhibited the opposite pattern. High-volume hospitals had a decrease in the number of cases from 2012 and were overtaken by medium-volume hospitals in 2015. Most procedures are performed within the New York City (NYC) area, though AIS was common in all NYS counties. AIS diagnoses increased after 2010, with fewer patients self-paying for surgery. White patients underwent more procedures than minority patients. Surgical cases were disproportionally performed in the NYC area compared to statewide.

In-Office Needle Arthroscopy with Meniscal Repair for Meniscal Lesions of the Knee

Meniscal injuries are a common cause of knee pain and are often an indication for knee arthroscopy, the most common orthopedic surgical procedure in the United States. In-office needle arthroscopy (IONA) is a described technique with the ability to diagnose and treat meniscal injuries in the office. IONA allows for diagnosis and treatment at a significantly deceased cost, with both quicker patient recovery, and improved patient satisfaction. The purpose of this technical report is to describe the technique for performing in-office needle arthroscopy for meniscal injuries of the knee, including the technique for obtaining adequate local anesthesia, proper indications, adequate visualization, and the advantages of performing these procedures in the office rather than the operating room.

Differential Utilization Patterns of Total Ankle Arthroplasty vs Arthrodesis: A United States National Ambulatory Database Analysis

Background

End-stage ankle osteoarthritis is a condition that can be treated with ankle arthrodesis (AA) or total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The goal of this study is to estimate the 2016-2017 United States' utilization of TAA and AA in specific ambulatory settings and delineate patient and hospital factors associated with the selection of TAA vs AA for treatment of ankle osteoarthritis.

Methods

TAA and AA procedures performed for ankle osteoarthritis were identified in the 2016-2017 Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample (NASS) Database. Notably, the NASS database only examines instances of ambulatory surgery encounters at hospital-owned facilities. As such, instances of TAA and AA performed at privately owned or freestanding ambulatory surgical centers or those performed inpatient are excluded from this analysis. Cases were weighted using nationally representative discharge weights. Univariate analyses and a combined multiple logistic regression model were used to compare demographic, hospital-related, and socioeconomic factors associated with TAA vs AA.

Results

In total, 6577 cases were identified, which represents 9072 cases after weighting. Of these, TAA was performed for 2233 (24.6%). Based on the logistic regression model, several factors were associated with increased utilization of TAA vs AA. With regard to patient factors, older patients were more likely to undergo TAA, as well as females. Conversely, patients with a higher comorbidity burden were less likely to receive TAA over AA.With regard to socioeconomic factors, urban teaching and urban nonteaching hospitals were significantly more likely to use TAA compared to rural hospitals. Similarly, privately insured patients and those with a median household income of $71 000 or more were also more likely to receive TAA over AA. Private hospitals ("not-for-profit" and "investor-owned") were significantly more likely to offer TAA over AA.

Conclusion

Using a large nationally representative cohort, the current data revealed that during 2016-2017, 24.6% of operatively treated cases of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis in the ambulatory setting are treated with TAA. Associations between socioeconomic and hospital-level factors with TAA utilization suggest that nonclinical factors may influence surgical treatment choice for ankle osteoarthritis.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Low-Volume Surgeons Use Allograft in Younger Patients and Show Greater Rates of Revision Following Primary Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared With High-Volume Surgeons

Purpose

To determine whether surgeon volume affects revision rate following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with allograft and to determine whether surgeon volume impacts allograft tissue type used.

Methods

All patients aged 14 years or older who underwent primary allograft ACLR at a large hospital system between January 2015 to December 2019 with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patients with double-bundle ACLR, multiligament reconstruction, and absent allograft type data were excluded. Surgeon volume was categorized as 35 or more ACLR/year for high-volume surgeons and less than 35 ACLR/year for low-volume surgeons. Revision was defined as subsequent ipsilateral ACLR. Patient characteristics, operative details, allograft type, and revision ACLR rates were retrospectively collected. Revision rate and allograft type were analyzed based on surgeon volume.

Results

A total of 457 primary allograft ACLR cases (mean age: 38.8 ± 12.3 years) were included. Low-volume surgeons experienced greater revision rates (10% vs 5%, P = .04) and used allograft in a younger population (37.6 vs 40.0 years old, P = .03) than high-volume surgeons. Subgroup analysis of the total cohort identified a significantly increased failure rate in patients <25 years old compared with ≥25 years old (30% vs 4%, P < .001). Allograft type selection varied significantly between surgeon volume groups, with low-volume surgeons using more bone-patellar tendon-bone (P < .001) and less semitendinosus allograft (P = .01) than high-volume surgeons. No differences in revision rate were observed based on allograft type (P = .71).

Conclusions

There was a greater revision rate following primary allograft ACLR among low-volume surgeons compared with high-volume surgeons. Low-volume surgeons also used allograft in a younger population than did high-volume surgeons.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Surgeon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction volume and rates of concomitant meniscus repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of surgeon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) volume on rates of ACLR with concomitant meniscus repair versus meniscectomy and subsequent meniscus surgeries.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted from a database of all ACLR performed between 2015 and 2020 at a large integrated health care system. Surgeon volume was categorized as < 35 ACLR per year (low-volume), and ≥ 35 ACLR per year (high-volume). Rates of concomitant meniscus repair and meniscectomy were compared between low-volume and high-volume surgeons. Subgroup analyses compared the rates of subsequent meniscus surgery and procedure time based on surgeon volume and meniscus procedure type.

RESULTS

A total of 3,911 patients undergoing ACLR were included. High-volume surgeons performed concomitant meniscus repair statistically significantly more often than low-volume surgeons (32.0% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression indicated 4.15 times higher odds of meniscus repair among high-volume surgeons. Subsequent meniscus surgery occurred more commonly following ACLR with meniscus repair among low-volume surgeons (6.7% vs 3.4%, p = 0.047), but not high-volume surgeons (7.0% vs 4.3%, p = 0.079). Low-volume surgeons also had longer procedure times for concomitant meniscus repair (129.9 vs 118.3 min, p = 0.003) and meniscectomy (100.6 vs 95.9 min, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this study shows that surgeons with lower volume of ACLR select meniscus resection statistically significantly more often than higher-volume surgeons. However, an abundance of literature is available to show that meniscus loss negatively affects the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in patients Therefore, as demonstrated in this study by high-volume surgeons, the meniscus should be repaired and protected whenever possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tear Management With Meniscectomy Versus Repair Correlates With Patient, Socioeconomic, and Hospital Factors

INTRODUCTION

Bucket-handle meniscus tears are common knee injuries that are often treated surgically with meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Although clinical factors may influence the choice of one treatment approach over the other, the influence of patient, socioeconomic, and hospital factors remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to estimate the relative nationwide utilization of these two procedures and delineate a variety of factors that are associated with the selection of one treatment approach over the other.

METHODS

Meniscal repair and meniscectomy procedures conducted for isolated bucket-handle meniscus tears in 2016 and 2017 were identified in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample database. Cases were weighted using nationally representative discharge weights. Univariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression model were used to compare patient, socioeconomic, and hospital factors associated with meniscal repair versus meniscectomy.

RESULTS

In total, 12,239 cases were identified, which represented 17,236 cases after weighting. Of these, meniscal repair was conducted for 4,138 (24.0%). Based on the logistic regression model, meniscal repair was less likely for older and sicker patients. By contrast, several factors were associated with markedly higher odds of undergoing meniscal repair compared with meniscectomy. These included urban teaching hospitals; geographic location in the midwest, south, and west; and higher median household income.

DISCUSSION

Using a large nationally representative cohort, the current data revealed that only 24.0% of surgically treated bucket-handle meniscus tears were treated using repair. Identification of patient, socioeconomic, and hospital factors differentially associated with meniscal repair suggest that other factors may systematically influence surgical decision-making for this patient population. Surgeons should be conscious of these potential healthcare disparities when determining the optimal treatment for their patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients with and without multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disease with debilitating manifestations that may predispose patients to hip fracture and osteoarthritis, and may affect recovery from total hip arthroplasty (THA). With increased longevity of MS patients and growth in demand for arthroplasty in this population, it is important to understand outcomes of THA in patients with MS.

AIM

We sought to compare outcomes of THA among persons with MS and without MS.

METHODS

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision Procedure Coding System (ICD-9-PCS) codes for hip arthroplasty (815.1) were used to identify all patients in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database who underwent THA between 2000 and 2014. Patients with MS, the primary exposure, were identified using ICD-9-Clinical Modification (CM) code 340. The study outcomes of length of stay (days), discharge disposition, index admission mortality, 90-day readmission, 1-year revision arthroplasty, and 1-year all-cause mortality were evaluated using multivariable regression analyses inclusive of basic demographics, admission source, disposition, payer, comorbidity, and socioeconomic status (SES).

RESULTS

Compared to patients without MS, those with MS had marginally longer lengths of stay (mean ratio [MR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.10; p = 0.0142), higher risk for institutional discharge disposition (odds ratio [OR] 2.03; 95% CI, 1.54-2.70; p < 0.0001) and higher risk of readmission for revision hip arthroplasty (OR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.07-6.35; p = 0.035). However, MS patients had similar risk for 90-day readmission and one-year all-cause mortality as compared with non-MS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with MS who underwent THA had a 90-day complication risk that was similar to those without MS, the risk for requiring revision surgery was more than 2-fold higher. Additional studies are needed to understand the reasons for revision surgery and for developing strategies to mitigate the risk of complications.

Return to Work Following Arthroscopic Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

PURPOSE

Evaluate the ability of patients to return to work (RTW) following arthroscopic meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) for meniscal deficiency.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing MAT were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Patients completed a subjective work questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale for pain, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients who were employed within 3 years prior to surgery (average age: 30.2 ± 6.9 years) were contacted at an average of 3.5 ± 0.9 years postoperatively. Forty-six patients (97.8%) returned to work by 2.7 ± 2.6 months postoperatively, and 44 patients (93.6%) returned to the same level of occupational intensity. Patients who held sedentary, light, medium, or high intensity occupations were able to RTW at a rate of 100.0%, 100.0%, 88.9%, and 85.7% (P = 0.4) by 1.1 ± 1.0 months, 2.5 ± 2.5 months, 3.5 ± 3.2 months, and 4.3 ± 2.8 months (P = 0.3) postoperatively. Thirty-eight patients (80.9%) were at least somewhat satisfied, and 43 patients (91.5%) would still have the operation if presented the opportunity. No patient underwent revision MAT or conversion to arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

In patients with painful meniscal deficiency, MAT provides a high rate of RTW (97.8%) by 2.7 ± 2.6 months postoperatively. However, some patients may be unable to return to their previous level of occupational intensity. Although statistically insignificant, patients with higher intensity occupations may have a lower rate and longer duration until RTW than those with less physically demanding occupations. Information regarding RTW is imperative for appropriately managing postoperative expectations.

Cartilage Restoration for Tibiofemoral Bipolar Lesions Results in Promising Failure Rates: A Systematic Review

Purpose

The purpose of the present study is to systematically review the available literature for management of bipolar lesions within the tibiofemoral joint and determine whether tibiofemoral cartilage restoration is an effective treatment modality.

Methods

PubMed and MEDLINE databases were queried between 2000 and 2020 using the following keywords: “osteochondral” and “knee” and “microfracture,” “autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI),” or “transplantation." Articles were reviewed for the presence of a bipolar or “kissing” tibiofemoral lesion and reported lesion size, concomitant procedures, failure rates, and time to failure.

Results

After screening 1,295 articles, there were 4 articles available for analysis and a total of 152 knees involving the management of bipolar tibiofemoral lesions. Age ranged from 14 to 60 years, and mean follow-up was between 12 and 240 months. There was 1 retrospective cohort study (36 knees) and 3 case series (mean, 38.7 ± 17.5 knees). There were 58 knees treated with bipolar osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation, 58 knees treated with bipolar ACI, 20 knees treated with femoral OCA and tibial debridement, and 16 knees treated with femoral OCA and tibial microfracture. There were 37 failures (24.3%): 16 patients (10.5%) were converted to unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty, 4 restorative procedures (2.6%) were revised, and 8 patients (1.6%) had unsatisfactory outcomes only. The remaining 15 failures (9.9%) had an unspecified combination of objective failure. The mean rate of failure ranged between 0% and 44.1% (I² = 83.2%). The mean time to failure ranged between 2.7 and 4.1 years (I² = 79.1%).

Conclusions

Cartilage restoration, through both ACI and OCA, had failure rates between 0% and 44% in patients with bipolar lesions of the tibiofemoral compartment. Although a higher level of evidence is required to prove efficacy, the current study demonstrates midterm survivorship rates between 55% and 100%, which may delay the need for secondary arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Analysis of Charges and Payments for Outpatient Arthroscopic Meniscectomy From 2005 to 2014: Hospital Reimbursement Increased Steadily as Surgeon Payments Declined

Background:

Charge and reimbursement trends for arthroscopic partial meniscectomies among orthopaedic surgeons, anesthesiologists, and hospital/surgery centers have not been formally analyzed, even though meniscectomies are the most commonly performed orthopaedic surgery.

Purpose:

To analyze Medicare charge and reimbursement trends for surgeons, anesthesiologists, and hospital/surgery centers for outpatient arthroscopic partial meniscectomies performed in the United States.

Study Design:

Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We analyzed trends in surgeon, anesthesiologist, and hospital charges and reimbursements for outpatient isolated arthroscopic partial meniscectomies from 2005 to 2014. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to capture charge and reimbursement information using the nationally representative 5% Medicare sample. National and regional trends for charge, reimbursement, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were evaluated using linear regression analysis.

Results:

A total of 31,717 patients were analyzed in this study. Charges across all groups increased significantly (P < .001) during the 10-year study period, with an increase of 18.4% ($2754-$3262) for surgeons, 85.5% ($802-$1480) for anesthesiologists, and 116.8% ($2743-$5947) for hospitals. Surgeon reimbursements declined by 15.5% ($504-$426; P = .072) during this period. Anesthesiologist and hospital reimbursements increased significantly during by 36.5% ($133-$182; P < .001) and 28.9% ($1540-$1984; P < .001) during the 10-year study period, respectively. The annual incidence of partial meniscectomies per 10,000 database patients decreased significantly from 18.3 to 15.6 over the course of the study (14.8% decrease; P = .009), while the CCI did not change significantly (P = .798).

Conclusion:

Hospital and anesthesiologist Medicare reimbursements for outpatient arthroscopic partial meniscectomies increased significantly, while surgeon reimbursements decreased. In 2005, hospitals were reimbursed 205% more ($1540 vs $504) than surgeons, and by 2014, they were reimbursed 365% more ($1984 vs $426), indicating that the gap between hospital and surgeon reimbursement is rising. Improved understanding of charge and reimbursement trends represents an opportunity for key stakeholders to improve financial alignment across the field of orthopaedics.

Long-term National Trends of Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Debridement

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of meniscal pathology continues to evolve in orthopaedic surgery, with a growing understanding of which patients benefit from which procedure and which patients might be best treated nonsurgically. In 2002, Moseley et al found no difference between arthroscopic procedures, including meniscal debridement and sham surgery, in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. This called into question the role of routine arthroscopic debridement in these patients. Additionally, an increased interest in understanding and maintaining the function of the meniscus has more recently resulted in a greater focus on meniscal preservation procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiology study.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to evaluate the trends of arthroscopic meniscal debridement and repair and the characteristics of the patients receiving these treatments, compare the differences in practice between newly trained orthopaedic sports medicine specialists and those of other specialties, and analyze if there are differences in practice by region. It was hypothesized that the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) database would evaluate practice patterns of recent graduates as a surrogate for current treatment and training and, consequently, demonstrate a decreased rate of meniscal debridement.

METHODS

Data from ABOS Part II examinees from 2001 to 2017 were obtained from the ABOS Case List. Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes related to arthroscopic meniscal treatment were selected. The examination year, age of the patient, practice region, and examinee subspecialty were analyzed. Patient age was stratified into 4 groups: <30, 30 to 50, 51 to 65, and >65 years. Examinee subspecialty was stratified into sports medicine and non-sports medicine. Statistical regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Between 2001 and 2017, ABOS Part II examinees submitted 131,047 cases with CPT codes 29880 to 29883. Meniscal debridement volume decreased for all age groups during the study period, while repair increased. Sports medicine subspecialists were more likely than their counterparts to perform repair over debridement in patients aged younger than 30 years (P = .0004) and between 30 and 50 years (P = .0005).

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into arthroscopic meniscal debridement and repair practice trends among ABOS Part II examinees. Meniscal debridement is decreasing and meniscal repair is increasing. Younger patient age and treatment by a sports medicine subspecialty examinee are associated with a higher likelihood of repair over debridement.

Recent Trends in Concomitant Meniscal Procedures During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The chondroprotective effect and secondary stabilizing role of the meniscus has been well-established. Meniscal preservation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been advocated in the literature and supported by advancements in surgical techniques.

PURPOSE

To examine the recent trends in concomitant partial meniscectomy and meniscal repair procedures with ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiological study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 29880, 29881), meniscal repair (CPT codes 29882, 29883), and ACLR (CPT code 29888) between 2010 and 2018 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We calculated the proportion of patients who underwent each surgery type, stratified by year and by patient age and body mass index (BMI) groups. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to analyze yearly proportions of concomitant meniscal surgery types.

RESULTS

During the 9-year study period, 22,760 patients underwent either isolated ACLR (n = 10,562) or ACLR with concomitant meniscal surgery (either meniscectomy [n = 8931] or meniscal repair [n = 3267]). There was a gradual decrease in the proportion of meniscectomies (from 80.8% of concomitant procedures in 2010 to 63.8% in 2018), while the proportion of meniscal repairs almost doubled (from 19.2% in 2010 to 36.2% in 2018) (trend, P < .001). ACLR with meniscal repair increased in patients aged 35 to 44 years and 45 to 54 years (trend, P = .027) between 2010 and 2018; at the same time, the proportion of normal weight patients decreased by 17.7%, the proportion of overweight patients increased by 13.2%, and increases were seen in BMI groups corresponding to obesity classes 1 to 3 (trend, P < .001). In 2010, the average BMI of patients undergoing ACLR with meniscectomy versus meniscal repair differed by 2 (P = .004), but by 2018 the difference was nonsignificant (28.83 ± 5.80 vs 28.53 ± 5.73; P = .113).

CONCLUSION

Between 2010 and 2018, there was an upward trend in the proportion of meniscal repairs performed during ACLR, with notable increases in the proportion of repairs being performed on older, overweight, and obese patients.

Trends in the Management of Traumatic Upper Extremity Amputations

PURPOSE

Treatment for upper extremity amputations includes revision amputation or attempted replantation. The rate of digital replantation has been declining in the United States. Prior studies discovered the presence of socioeconomic disparities associated with these injuries. The goals of this study were to investigate yearly trends of traumatic upper extremity amputations and evaluate the presence of disparities with access to care in these injuries.

METHODS

The 2008 to 2014 New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) inpatient and outpatient databases were utilized to identify patients who had traumatic upper extremity amputations. We queried the database for patient characteristics, resource utilization characteristics, insurance status, major in-hospital complications, and mortality. Patients at low-, medium-, and high-volume institutions were compared. We performed multivariable logistic regressions for the binary variable replantation (yes/no) controlling for age, sex, race, insurance status, amputation level, admission hour, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 2,492 patients met our inclusion criteria: 92.1% sustained digital amputations and 7.9% sustained arm amputations. The annual rate of inpatient finger amputations decreased significantly (1.9 per 100,000 people in 2008 vs 1.4 per 100,000 people in 2014) during the study period while that of outpatient finger amputations increased significantly (12.0 per 100,000 people in 2008 vs 15.5 per 100,000 people in 2014). Multivariable analysis demonstrated incrementally lower odds for replantation with increasing age and increased odds for replantation in patients with private insurance (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.50). The number of replantation surgeries at medium-volume institutions decreased by 45% while remaining steady in low- and high-volume institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings corroborate the findings of other studies that underscore the existence of disparities with respect to insurance status in these injuries. Replantations occur more frequently at high-volume hospitals and are more common in younger patients with private insurance. This finding suggests that patients with traumatic amputations may benefit from treatment at high-volume institutions. Further research to help improve access to such institutions is warranted.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Volume-outcome relationship in halo vest utilization for C2 fractures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The prevalence of C2 fractures has increased in recent years. The treatment of these fractures include halo-vest immobilization (HVI), rigid cervical collar, or spinal fusion. There is controversy regarding the management of these fractures with different institutions having their own protocols based on individualized experience. The volume-outcome relationship of HVI use for C2 fractures has not been studied. Evaluation of such relationships are important as they suggest that patients may benefit from referral to and treatment at high-volume institutions.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the volume-outcome relationship in HVI use for C2 fractures in New York State.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a statewide database.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We queried the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database for the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code 805.02 (closed fracture of second cervical vertebra) and procedure code 029.4 (insertion or replacement of skull tongs or halo traction device) to identify all patients who received HVI for a fracture of the second cervical vertebra between the years 2001 and 2014. Those who had isolated C2 fractures were selected.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes of interest included resource utilization characteristics (hospitalization charges and length of stay), perioperative complications, comorbidities, 30-day mortality, any readmission, and any future cervical fusion surgery.

METHODS

The 2001 to 2014 Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was used to identify patients with C2 fractures who received HVI. Our key independent variable was institution volume modeled as high- (>25 halos/year), medium-, (10-25 halos/year), or low-volume (<10 halos/year) based on the total number of HVI procedures reported by hospitals during the study period. We compared outcomes with respect to hospital volume. We also compared patients by age groups: <40, 40 to 60, 60 to 80, and >80. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed for the binary variables any complication and any readmission while controlling for covariates hospital volume, age, sex, race, insurance status, and Elixhauser comorbidity mean. Statistical significance was set at a value of p<.05 for all analyses.

RESULTS

In all, 625 patients with C2 fractures managed with HVI were included. Most patients were male (53%) and Caucasian (76%) with a mean age of 57. Patients at high-volume hospitals were younger (52 vs. 59 and 60 for medium- and low-volume, respectively; p<.01) and had fewer future readmissions (40% vs. 54% and 84% for medium- and low-volume, respectively; p<.01). On multivariable analysis, those with private insurance and worker's compensation had lower likelihood of future readmission compared to Medicaid patients. Patients >80 had higher rates of major in-hospital complications (52% vs. 40%, 18%, and 19% for groups 60-79, 40-59, and <40, respectively; p<.01), mortality (14% vs. 5%, 1%, and 1% for groups 60-79, 40-59, and <40, respectively; p<.01), and readmissions after the initial HVI (62% vs. 50%, 54%, and 37% for groups 60-79, 40-59, and <40, respectively; p<.01). The annual rate of HVI use for C2 fractures decreased significantly from 2001 to 2014 (0.32 to 0.06 HVI procedures per 100,000 people; p<.01) with the rate of decline being less pronounced in high-volume institutions (70% decrease vs. 85% and 90% for medium- and low-volume, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Halo vest utilization for C2 fractures in New York State has been declining over the past decade, with the decline being less pronounced in high-volume hospitals. Our hospital volume analysis suggests that HVI use in high-volume institutions is associated with a lower rate of future readmissions. This finding suggests that patients with C2 fractures may benefit from treatment at high-volume institutions. Further research to help improve referral of appropriate patients and increase access to such institutions is warranted.

Opioid Use After Common Sports Medicine Procedures: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

The prescription of opioids after elective surgical procedures has been a contributing factor to the current opioid epidemic in North America.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the opioid prescribing practices and rates of opioid consumption among patients undergoing common sports medicine procedures.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the electronic databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed was performed from database inception to December 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Two investigators independently identified all studies reporting on postoperative opioid prescribing practices and consumption after arthroscopic shoulder, knee, or hip surgery. A total of 119 studies were reviewed, with 8 meeting eligibility criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

DATA EXTRACTION

The quantity of opioids prescribed and used were converted to milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) for standardized reporting. The quality of each eligible study was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies including 816 patients with a mean age of 43.8 years were eligible for inclusion. A mean of 610, 197, and 613 MMEs were prescribed to patients after arthroscopic procedures of the shoulder, knee, and hip, respectively. At final follow-up, 31%, 34%, and 64% of the prescribed opioids provided after shoulder, knee, and hip arthroscopy, respectively, still remained. The majority of patients (64%) were unaware of the appropriate disposal methods for surplus medication. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair had the highest opioid consumption (471 MMEs), with 1 in 4 patients receiving a refill.

CONCLUSION

Opioids are being overprescribed for arthroscopic procedures of the shoulder, knee, and hip, with more than one-third of prescribed opioids remaining postoperatively. The majority of patients are unaware of the appropriate disposal techniques for surplus opioids. Appropriate risk stratification tools and evidence-based recommendations regarding pain management strategies after arthroscopic procedures are needed to help curb the growing opioid crisis.

What are the prevalence and risk factors for repeat ipsilateral knee arthroscopy?

PURPOSE

The number of arthroscopic knee surgeries performed annually has increased over the last decade. It remains unclear what proportion of individuals undergoing knee arthroscopy is at risk for subsequent ipsilateral procedures. Better knowledge of risk factors and the incidence of reoperative ipsilateral arthroscopy are important in setting expectations and counselling patients on treatment options. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of repeat ipsilateral knee arthroscopy, and the risk factors associated with subsequent surgery over long-term follow-up.

METHODS

The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems outpatient database was reviewed from 2003 to 2016 to identify patients who underwent elective, primary knee arthroscopy for one of the following diagnosis-related categories of procedures: Group 1: cartilage repair and transfer; Group 2: osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions; Group 3: meniscal repair, debridement, chondroplasty, and synovectomy; Group 4: multiple different procedures. Subjects were followed for 10 years to determine the odds of subsequent ipsilateral knee arthroscopy. Risk factors including the group of arthroscopic surgery, age group, gender, race, insurance type, surgeon volume, and comorbidities were analysed to identify factors predicting subsequent surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 765,144 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy between 2003 and 2016, were identified. The majority (751,873) underwent meniscus-related arthroscopy. The proportion of patients undergoing subsequent ipsilateral knee arthroscopy was 2.1% at 1-year, 5.5% at 5 years, and 6.7% at 10 years of follow-up. Among patients who underwent subsequent arthroscopic surgery at 1-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up, there was a greater proportion of patients with worker's compensation insurance (p < 0.001), index operations performed by very high volume surgeons (p < 0.001), and cartilage restoration index procedures (p < 0.001), compared with those who never underwent repeat ipsilateral surgery.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the incidence of subsequent knee arthroscopy after index procedure in different age groups and the patterns over 10 years of follow-up is important in counselling patients and setting future expectations. The majority of subsequent surgeries occur within the first 5 years after index surgery, and subjects tend to have higher odds of ipsilateral reoperation for up to 10 years if they have worker's compensation insurance, or if their index surgery was performed by a very high volume surgeon, or was a cartilage restoration procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.