1
|
Du PZ, Christopher ND, Ganapathy V. Association between cervical fracture patterns and blunt cerebrovascular injury when screened with computed tomographic angiography. Spine J 2024; 24:310-316. [PMID: 37734494 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Prior studies have demonstrated a close association between cervical spine fractures and blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI). Undiagnosed BCVI is a feared complication because of the potentially catastrophic outcomes in a missed posterior circulation stroke. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is commonly used to screen BCVI in the trauma setting. However, determining which cervical fracture patterns mandate screening is still not clearly known. PURPOSE The aim of this retrospective review is to further elucidate which fracture patterns are associated with BCVI when using CTA and may mandate screening. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE All patients that presented to our trauma and emergency departments with a blunt cervical spine fracture from January 2018 to December 2021. Inclusion criteria included blunt cervical trauma and the use of CTA for BCVI screening. Exclusion criteria included patients under the age of 18, penetrating cervical trauma, and use any imaging modality besides CTA for BCVI screening. OUTCOME MEASURES Patient demographics (age, gender, Glasgow coma scale, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, mechanism of energy of injury, polytrauma status), fracture location, fracture pattern (anterior arch, dens, dislocations/subluxations, facet, hangman, Jefferson, lamina, lateral mass, occipital condyle dissociation, occipital condyle, pedicle, posterior arch, spinous process, transverse process, transverse foramen, and vertebral body), and whether the patient sustained a BCVI or CVA. METHODS If a patient had multiple fracture levels or fracture patterns, each level and pattern was counted as a separate BCVI. Multilevel fractures were defined as any patient with fractures at two distinct cervical levels. Differences between the patients who had a BCVI and those who did not were analyzed using independent sample t-tests for continuous variables and the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess likelihood between patient characteristics/fracture characteristics and BCVI. RESULTS A total of 690 patients were identified as having a blunt cervical spine injury. A total of 453 patients (66%) underwent screening for BCVI with CTA. Among patients who underwent CTA, BCVI was diagnosed in 138 patients (30%), VAI in 119 patients (26%), CAI in 30 patients (7%), and 11 patients were diagnosed with both a VAI and CAI (2%). Overall, among all patients there were 9 strokes, all in patients identified with a BCVI (1%). No individual cervical level was associated with increased risk of BCVI, but when combined, OC-C3 fractures were associated with an increased risk (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-1.9, p-value: .006). Multilevel fractures were also associated with an increased risk (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.3, p-value: .01). The only fracture pattern associated with increased risk of BCVI were fractures associated with a dislocation/subluxation (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.9-7.8, p-value = .0001). CONCLUSIONS The only fracture pattern associated with an increased risk of BCVI were fractures associated with dislocation/subluxation. The only fracture levels associated with BCVI were combined OC-C3 and multilevel fractures. We recommend that any upper cervical fracture (OC-C3), multilevel fracture, or fracture with dislocation/subluxation undergo screening for BCVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Z Du
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Ave, 8th Floor Room 8401, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
| | - Nicholas D Christopher
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Ave, PO Box 245017, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Venkat Ganapathy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Ave, 8th Floor Room 8401, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crawford AM, Striano BM, Gong J, Simpson AK, Schoenfeld AJ. Does the Stopping Opioids After Surgery Score Perform Well Among Racial and Socioeconomic Subgroups? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:2343-2351. [PMID: 37159263 PMCID: PMC10642872 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Stopping Opioids After Surgery (SOS) score is a validated tool that was developed to determine the risk of sustained opioid use after surgical interventions, including orthopaedic procedures. Despite prior investigations validating the SOS score in diverse contexts, its performance across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic subgroups has not been assessed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES In a large, urban, academic health network, did the performance of the SOS score differ depending on (1) race and ethnicity or (2) socioeconomic status? METHODS This retrospective investigation was conducted using data from an internal, longitudinally maintained registry of a large, urban, academic health system in the Northeastern United States. Between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022, we treated 26,732 adult patients via rotator cuff repair, lumbar discectomy, lumbar fusion, TKA, THA, ankle or distal radius open reduction and internal fixation, or ACL reconstruction. We excluded 1% of patients (274 of 26,732) because of missing length of stay information, 0.06% (15) for missing discharge information, 1% (310) for missing medication information related to loss to follow-up, and 0.07% (19) who died during their hospital stay. Based on these inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26,114 adult patients were left for analysis. The median age in our cohort was 63 years (IQR 52 to 71), and most patients were women (52% [13,462 of 26,114]). Most patients self-reported their race and ethnicity as non-Hispanic White (78% [20,408 of 26,114]), but the cohort also included non-Hispanic Black (4% [939]), non-Hispanic Asian (2% [638]), and Hispanic (1% [365]) patients. Five percent (1295) of patients were of low socioeconomic status, defined by prior SOS score investigations as patients with Medicaid insurance. Components of the SOS score and the observed frequency of sustained postoperative opioid prescriptions were abstracted. The performance of the SOS score was compared across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic subgroups using the c-statistic, which measures the capacity of the model to differentiate between patients with and without sustained opioid use. This measure should be interpreted on a scale between 0 and 1, where 0 represents a model that perfectly predicts the wrong classification, 0.5 represents performance no better than chance, and 1.0 represents perfect discrimination. Scores less than 0.7 are generally considered poor. The baseline performance of the SOS score in past investigations has ranged from 0.76 to 0.80. RESULTS The c-statistic for non-Hispanic White patients was 0.79 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.81), which fell within the range of past investigations. The SOS score performed worse for Hispanic patients (c-statistic 0.66 [95% CI 0.52 to 0.79]; p < 0.001), where it tended to overestimate patients' risks of sustained opioid use. The SOS score for non-Hispanic Asian patients did not perform worse than in the White patient population (c-statistic 0.79 [95% CI 0.67 to 0.90]; p = 0.65). Similarly, the degree of overlapping CIs suggests that the SOS score did not perform worse in the non-Hispanic Black population (c-statistic 0.75 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.81]; p = 0.003). There was no difference in score performance among socioeconomic groups (c-statistic 0.79 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.83] for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients; 0.78 [95% CI 0.77 to 0.80] for patients who were not socioeconomically disadvantaged; p = 0.92). CONCLUSION The SOS score performed adequately for non-Hispanic White patients but performed worse for Hispanic patients, where the 95% CI nearly included an area under the curve value of 0.5, suggesting that the tool is no better than chance at predicting sustained opioid use for Hispanic patients. In the Hispanic population, it commonly overestimated the risk of opioid dependence. Its performance did not differ among patients of different sociodemographic backgrounds. Future studies might seek to contextualize why the SOS score overestimates expected opioid prescriptions for Hispanic patients and how the utility performs among more specific Hispanic subgroups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The SOS score is a valuable tool in ongoing efforts to combat the opioid epidemic; however, disparities exist in terms of its clinical applicability. Based on this analysis, the SOS score should not be used for Hispanic patients. Additionally, we provide a framework for how other predictive models should be tested in various lesser-represented populations before implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jonathan Gong
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew K. Simpson
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crawford AM, Striano BM, Gong J, Koehlmoos TP, Simpson AK, Schoenfeld AJ. Validation of the Stopping Opioids After Surgery (SOS) Score for the Sustained Use of Prescription Opioids Following Orthopaedic Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:1403-1409. [PMID: 37410854 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.23.00061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Stopping Opioids after Surgery (SOS) score was developed to identify patients at risk for sustained opioid use following surgery. The SOS score has not been specifically validated for patients in a general orthopaedic context. Our primary objective was to validate the SOS score within this context. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we considered a broad array of representative orthopaedic procedures performed between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022. These procedures included rotator cuff repair, lumbar discectomy, lumbar fusion, total knee and total hip arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fracture, ORIF of distal radial fracture, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The performance of the SOS score was evaluated by calculating the c-statistic, receiver operating characteristic curve, and the observed rates of sustained prescription opioid use (defined as uninterrupted prescriptions of opioids for ≥90 days) following surgery. For our sensitivity analysis, we compared these metrics among various time epochs related to the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS A total of 26,114 patients were included, of whom 51.6% were female and 78.1% were White. The median age was 63 years. The observed prevalence of sustained opioid use was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2% to 1.5%) in the low-risk group (SOS score of <30), 7.4% (95% CI, 6.9% to 8.0%) in the medium-risk group (SOS score of 30 to 60), and 20.8% (95% CI, 17.7% to 24.2%) in the high-risk group (SOS score of >60). The performance of the SOS score in the overall group was strong, with a c-statistic of 0.82. The performance of the SOS score showed no evidence of worsening over time. The c-statistic was 0.79 before the COVID-19 pandemic and ranged from 0.77 to 0.80 throughout the waves of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS We validated the use of the SOS score for sustained prescription opioid use following a diverse array of orthopaedic procedures across subspecialties. This tool is easy to implement for the purpose of prospectively identifying patients in musculoskeletal service lines who are at higher risk for sustained opioid use, thereby enabling the future implementation of upstream interventions and modifications to avert opioid abuse and to combat the opioid epidemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Crawford
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brendan M Striano
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan Gong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tracey P Koehlmoos
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morishita S, Yoshii T, Inose H, Hirai T, Yuasa M, Matsukura Y, Ogawa T, Fushimi K, Katayanagi J, Jinno T, Okawa A, Fujiwara T. Perioperative Complications of Laminoplasty in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy -A Comparative Study Between Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database. Global Spine J 2023; 13:1956-1963. [PMID: 34920676 PMCID: PMC10556883 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211063867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES Laminoplasty (LAMP) is one of the effective methods to successfully achieve surgical decompression in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). However, little evidence exists regarding the perioperative complications in LAMP for patients with ossification of the longitudinal ligament (OPLL) compared with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). We aimed to investigate the perioperative complication rates and medical costs of DCM, including OPLL and CSM patients who underwent LAMP using a large national inpatient database. METHODS This study identified patients who underwent LAMP for OPLL and CSM from 2010 to 2016 using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We compared the incidence of perioperative complications (systemic and local), reoperation rates, medical costs during hospitalization, and mortality were between the OPLL and CSM groups after propensity score matching. RESULTS This study included 22,714 patients (OPLL: 7485 patients, CSM: 15,229 patients). Consequently, 7169 pairs were matched. More perioperative systemic complications were detected in the OPLL group (one complication: 9.1% vs 7.7%; P = .002), especially for pneumonia (.5% vs .2%; P = .001) and dysphagia (.5% vs .2%; P = .004). The local complication rate was also higher in the OPLL group (paralysis: 1.1% vs .6%, P = .006; spinal fluid leakage: .4% vs .1%, P = .002). The hospitalization costs were approximately $2300 higher ($19,024 vs $16,770; P < .001) in the OPLL group. CONCLUSIONS More perioperative complications and higher medical costs were noted in patients with OPLL than in patients with CSM who underwent LAMP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shingo Morishita
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Toshitaka Yoshii
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Inose
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Hirai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Yuasa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Matsukura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahisa Ogawa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junya Katayanagi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Jinno
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Atsushi Okawa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Fujiwara
- Department of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Crawford AM, Striano BM, Giberson-Chen CC, Xiong GX, Lightsey HM, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Projected Lifetime Cancer Risk Associated With Intraoperative Computed Tomography for Lumbar Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:893-900. [PMID: 37040462 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE (1) To determine the incremental increase in intraoperative ionizing radiation conferred by computed tomography (CT) as compared with conventional radiography; and (2) to model different lifetime cancer risks contextualized by the intersection between age, sex, and intraoperative imaging modality. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Emerging technologies in spine surgery, like navigation, automation, and augmented reality, commonly utilize intraoperative CT. Although much has been written about the benefits of such imaging modalities, the inherent risk profile of increasing intraoperative CT has not been well evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Effective doses of intraoperative ionizing radiation were extracted from 610 adult patients who underwent single-level instrumented fusion for lumbar degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis from January 2015 through January 2022. Patients were divided into those who received intraoperative CT (n=138) and those who underwent conventional intraoperative radiography (n=472). Generalized linear modeling was utilized with intraoperative CT use as a primary predictor and patient demographics, disease characteristics, and preference-sensitive intraoperative considerations ( e.g. surgical approach and surgical invasiveness) as covariates. The adjusted risk difference in radiation dose calculated from our regression analysis was used to prognosticate the associated cancer risk across age and sex strata. RESULTS (1) After adjusting for covariates, intraoperative CT was associated with 7.6 mSv (interquartile range: 6.8-8.4 mSv; P <0.001) more radiation than conventional radiography. (2) For the median patient in our population (a 62-year-old female), intraoperative CT use increased lifetime cancer risk by 2.3 incidents (interquartile range: 2.1-2.6) per 10,000. Similar projections for other age and sex strata were also appreciated. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative CT use significantly increases cancer risk compared with conventional intraoperative radiography for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusions. As emerging technologies in spine surgery continue to proliferate and leverage intraoperative CT for cross-sectional imaging data, strategies must be developed by surgeons, institutions, and medical technology companies to mitigate long-term cancer risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Crawford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Brendan M Striano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Carew C Giberson-Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Grace X Xiong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Harry M Lightsey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tran NA, Pawar JP, Tobert D, Harris MB, Khurana B. Upper cervical spine fracture patterns and blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Emerg Radiol 2023; 30:315-323. [PMID: 37043145 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-023-02129-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine patterns of C1 and C2 vertebral fractures that are associated with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI). METHODS Retrospective chart review of clinical and imaging reports at a level 1 trauma center over 10 consecutive years was conducted in patients with C1 and C2 fractures. Student t-test and chi-squared analyses were used to determine associations between fracture levels and fracture types with the presence of BCVI on CTA and/or MRI or stroke on CT and/or MRI. RESULTS Multilevel fractures were associated with higher incidence of BCVI compared to isolated C1 or C2 fractures (p < 0.01), but not with stroke (p = 0.16). There was no difference in incidence of BCVI or stroke between isolated C1 and isolated C2 fractures (p = 0.46, p = 0.25). Involvement of the transverse foramen (TF) alone was not associated with BCVI or stroke (p = 0.10-0.40, p = 0.34-0.43). However, TF fractures that were comminuted or contained fracture fragment(s) were associated with increased BCVI (p < 0.01, p = 0.02), though not with stroke (p = 0.11, p = 0.09). In addition, high-energy mechanism of injury was also associated with BCVI (p < 0.01) and stroke (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION C1 and C2 fractures are associated with BCVI in the presence of high-energy mechanism of injury, concomitant fractures of other cervical vertebral body levels, comminuted TF fractures, or TF fractures with internal fragments. Attention to these fracture parameters is important in evaluating C1 and C2 fractures for BCVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngoc-Anh Tran
- Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
| | - Jayashri P Pawar
- Center for Clinical Data Science, Massachusetts General Hospital & Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Daniel Tobert
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Mitchel B Harris
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Bharti Khurana
- Trauma Imaging Research and Innovation Center, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crawford AM, Striano BM, Lightsey HM, Gong J, Simpson AK, Schoenfeld AJ. Intraoperative CT for Lumbar Fusion Is Not Associated with Improved Short- or Long-Term Complication Profiles. Spine J 2023; 23:791-798. [PMID: 36870450 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The use of intraoperative CT has continued to grow in recent years, as various techniques leverage the promise of improved instrumentation accuracy and the hope for decreased complications. Nonetheless, the literature regarding the short- and long-term complications associated with such techniques remains scant and/or confounded by indication and selection bias. PURPOSE To use causal inference techniques to determine whether intraoperative CT use is associated with an improved complication profile as compared to conventional radiography for single-level lumbar fusions, an increasingly commonplace application for this technology. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Inverse probability weighted retrospective cohort study carried out within a large integrated healthcare network PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients who underwent surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis via lumbar fusion from January 2016 through December 2021 OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome was the incidence rate of revision surgery. Our secondary outcome was the incidence of composite 90-day complications (deep and superficial surgical site infection, venous thromboembolic events, and unplanned readmissions). METHODS Demographics, intraoperative information, and postoperative complications were abstracted from electronic health records. A propensity score was developed utilizing a parsimonious model to account for covariate interaction with our primary predictor, intraoperative imaging technique. This propensity score was utilized in the creation of inverse probability weights to adjust for indication and selection bias. The rate of revisions within 3 years as well as the rate of revisions at any time-point were compared between cohorts using Cox regression analysis. The incidence of composite 90-day complications were compared using negative binomial regression. RESULTS Our patient population consisted of 583 patients, with 132 who underwent intraoperative CT and 451 who underwent conventional radiographic techniques. There were no significant differences between cohorts following inverse probability weighting. No significant differences were detected in 3-year revision rates (HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.29, 1.92]; p=0.5), overall revision rates (HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.20, 1.46]; p=0.2), or 90-day complications (RC -0.24 [95% CI -1.35, 0.87]; p=0.7). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative CT use was not associated with an improved complication profile in either the short- or long-term for patients undergoing single-level instrumented fusion. This observed clinical equipoise should be weighed against resource and radiation-related costs when considering intraoperative CT for low complexity fusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Crawford
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Brendan M Striano
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Harry M Lightsey
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jonathan Gong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xiong GX, Greene NE, Hershman SH, Fogel HA, Schwab JH, Bono CM, Tobert DG. Does Nasal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Prevent Deep Surgical Site Infections for Elective Cervical Spinal Fusion? Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:E51-E58. [PMID: 35676748 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) testing and surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the setting of primary posterior cervical instrumented spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Preoperative MRSA screening and decolonization has demonstrated success for some orthopedic subspecialties in prevention of SSIs. Spine surgery, however, has seen varied results, potentially secondary to the anatomic and surgical heterogeneity of the patients included in prior studies. Given that prior research has demonstrated greater propensity for gram positive SSIs in the cervical spine, we sought to investigate if MRSA screening would be more impactful in the cervical spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult patients undergoing primary instrumented posterior cervical procedures from January 2015 to December 2019 were reviewed for MRSA testing <90 days before surgery, preoperative mupirocin, perioperative antibiotics, and SSI defined as operative incision and drainage (I&D) <90 days after surgery. Logistic regression modeling used SSI as the primary outcome, MRSA screening as primary predictor, and clinical and demographic factors as covariates. RESULTS This study included 668 patients, of whom MRSA testing was performed in 212 patients (31.7%) and 6 (2.8%) were colonized with MRSA. Twelve patients (1.8%) underwent an I&D. On adjusted analysis, preoperative MRSA testing was not associated with postoperative I&D risk. Perioperative vancomycin similarly had no association with postoperative I&D risk. Notably, 6 patients (50%) grew methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus from intraoperative cultures, with no cases of MRSA. CONCLUSIONS There was no association between preoperative nasal MRSA screening and SSIs in primary posterior cervical instrumented procedures, nor was there any association between vancomycin or infection rate. Furthermore, there was a preponderance of gram positive infections but none caused by MRSA. Given these findings, the considerable cost and effort associated with MRSA testing in the setting of primary posterior cervical instrumentation may not be justified. Further research should investigate if higher-risk scenarios demonstrate greater utility of preoperative testing.
Collapse
|
9
|
Temperley HC, McDonnell JM, O'Sullivan NJ, Waters C, Cunniffe G, Darwish S, Butler JS. The Incidence, Characteristics and Outcomes of Vertebral Artery Injury Associated with Cervical Spine Trauma: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J 2022; 13:1134-1152. [PMID: 36341773 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221137823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic Review. OBJECTIVES Vertebral Artery Injury (VAI) is a potentially serious complication of cervical spine fractures. As many patients can be asymptomatic at the time of injury, the identification and diagnosis of VAI can often prove difficult. Due to the high rates of morbidity and mortality associated with VAI, high clinical suspicion is paramount. The purpose of this review is to elucidate incidence, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of VAI associated with cervical spine injuries. METHODS A systematic search of electronic databases was performed using 'PUBMED', 'EMBASE','Medline (OVID)', and 'Web of Science, for articles pertaining to traumatic cervical fractures with associated VAI. RESULTS 24 studies were included in this systematic review. Data was included from 48 744 patients. In regards to the demographics of the focus groups that highlighted information on VAI, the mean average age was 46.6 (32.1-62.6). 75.1% (169/225) were male and 24.9% (56/225) were female. Overall incidence of VAI was 596/11 479 (5.19%). 190/420 (45.2%) of patients with VAI had fractures involving the transverse foramina. The right vertebral artery was the most commonly injured 114/234 (48.7%). V3 was the most common section injured (16/36 (44.4%)). Grade I was the most common (103/218 (47.2%)) injury noted. Collective acute hospital mortality rate was 32/226 (14.2%), ranging from 0-26.2% across studies. CONCLUSION VAI secondary to cervical spine trauma has a notable incidence and high associated mortality rates. The current available literature is limited by a low quality of evidence. In order to optimise diagnostic protocols and treatment strategies, in addition to reducing mortality rates associated with VAI, robust quantitative and qualitative studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jake M McDonnell
- 8881The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Gráinne Cunniffe
- 8881The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Joseph S Butler
- 8881The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Du PZ, Barton D, Bridge N, Ganapathy V. Cervical fracture patterns associated with blunt cerebrovascular injures when utilizing computed tomographic angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J 2022; 22:1716-1725. [PMID: 35671944 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Prior studies have demonstrated an association between cervical spine fractures and blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) due to the intimate anatomic relationship between the cervical spine and the vertebral arteries. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has historically been the gold standard, but computed tomography angiography (CTA) is commonly used to screen for BCVI in the trauma setting. However, there is no consensus regarding which fracture patterns mandate screening. Over aggressive screening may lead to increased radiation, increased false positives, and overtreatment of patients which can cause unnecessary patient harm, and increased healthcare costs. PURPOSE The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze which cervical spine fracture patterns are most predictive of BCVI when utilizing CTA. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Systematic review and meta-analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES Odds ratios for specific cervical fracture patterns and risk of developing a BCVI. METHODS A systematic literature review of all English language studies from 2000-2020 was conducted. The year 2000 was chosen as the cut-off because use of CTA prior to 2000 was rare. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Global Index Medicus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) the diagnostic imaging modality was CTA; (2) investigated blunt cervical trauma; (3) noted specific cervical spine fracture patterns associated with BCVI; (4) odds ratios for specific cervical spine fracture patterns or the odds ratio could be calculated; (5) subjects were 18 years old or older. Studies were excluded if they: (1) included DSA or magnetic resonance imaging; (2) included penetrating cervical trauma; (3) included pediatric patients less than 18 years of age; (4) were not written in English. All statistical analysis was performed using R Studio (RStudio, Boston, MA, USA). RESULTS The initial search, after duplicates were removed, resulted in 10,940 articles for independent review. Six studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Specific fracture patterns mentioned are isolated C1, C2, C3 fractures, any C1-C3 fracture, any C4-C7 fracture, two-level fractures, subluxation/dislocations, and transverse foramen (TF) fractures. Three studies were included in the meta-analysis for C1, C2, C1-C3, subluxations/dislocations, and TF fractures. Two studies were included in the meta-analysis for C3, C4-C7, and two-level fractures. The pooled odds ratio with 95% confidence interval for: C1 fractures and BCVI is 1.3 (0.8-2.1); C2: 1.6 (0.9-2.8); C3: 1.8 (0.9-3.6); C1-C3: 2.2 (1.1-4.2); C4-C7: 0.7 (0.3-1.7); Two-level: 2.5 (1.4-4.6); Subluxation/Dislocation: 2.9 (1.8-4.5); TF: 3.6 (1.4-8.9). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION This study found that when utilizing CTA for screening of BCVI only fractures in the C1-C3 region, two-level fractures, subluxations/dislocations, and transverse foramen fractures were associated with increased incidence of a BCVI. Further refinement of protocols for CTA in the setting of blunt cervical trauma may help limit unnecessary patient harm from overtreatment and reduce healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Z Du
- University of Arizona - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1501 N Campbell Avenue, 8th Floor Room 8401, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
| | - Dane Barton
- University of Arizona - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1501 N Campbell Avenue, 8th Floor Room 8401, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | - Nathaniel Bridge
- University of Arizona - College of Medicine, 1501 N Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245017, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | - Venkat Ganapathy
- University of Arizona - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1501 N Campbell Avenue, 8th Floor Room 8401, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xiong GX, Greene NE, Hershman SH, Schwab JH, Bono CM, Tobert DG. Nasal screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus does not reduce surgical site infection after primary lumbar fusion. Spine J 2022; 22:113-125. [PMID: 34284131 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) testing and decolonization has demonstrated success for arthroplasty patients in surgical site infections (SSIs) prevention. Spine surgery, however, has seen varied results. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of nasal MRSA testing and operative debridement rates on surgical site infection after primary lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study and/or Consolidated medical enterprise PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing primary instrumented lumbar fusions from January 2015 to December 2019 were reviewed. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was incision and drainage performed in the operating room within 90 days of surgery. METHODS MRSA testing <90-day's before surgery, mupirocin prescription <30-day's before surgery, perioperative antibiotics, and Elixhauser comorbidity index were collected for each subject. Bivariate analysis used Wilcoxon rank-sum testing and logistic regression modeling Multivariable logistic regression modeling assessed for associations with MRSA testing, intravenous vancomycin use, and I&D rate. RESULTS The study included 1,884 patients for analysis, with mean age of 63.1 (SE 0.3) and BMI 29.5 (SE 0.1). MRSA testing was performed in 755 patients (40.1%) and was more likely to be performed in patients with lower Elixhauser index scores (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p=.021) on multivariable analysis. Vancomycin use increased significantly over time (OR 1.49 and/or year, 95% CI 1.3-1.8, p<.001) despite no change in mupirocin or I&D rates. MRSA testing, mupirocin prescriptions, perioperative parenteral vancomycin use, and intrawound vancomycin powder use had no impact on I&D rates. I&D risk was associated with higher BMI (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, p=.009) and higher number of blood product units transfused (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.46, p=.022). CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates no impact on surgical I&D rates from the use of preoperative MRSA testing. Increased BMI and transfusions were associated with operative I&D rates for surgical site infection. As a result of the hospital directive, vancomycin use increased over time with no associated change in infection rates, underscoring the need for focused interventions, and engagement with antibiotic stewardship programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace X Xiong
- Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Stuart H Hershman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher M Bono
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel G Tobert
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ziino C, Karhade AV, Schoenfeld AJ, Harris MB, Schwab JH. Characteristics of postoperative opioid prescription use following lumbar discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 35:710-714. [PMID: 34450580 DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.spine202041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of spine surgeons in precipitating and mediating sustained prescription opioid use remains controversial at this time. The purpose of this study was to identify prescription opioid use following lumbar discectomy and characterize the source of opioid prescriptions by clinician specialty (surgeon vs nonsurgeon). METHODS Using a retrospective review, the authors identified adult patients undergoing lumbar discectomy for a primary diagnosis of disc herniation between 2010 and 2017. The primary outcome was sustained prescription opioid use, defined as issue of an opioid prescription at a time point 90 days or longer after the surgical procedure. The primary predictor variable was prescriber specialty (surgeon vs nonsurgeon). The independent effect of provider specialty on the number of opioid prescriptions issued to patients was assessed using multivariable Poisson regression that accounted for confounding from all other clinical and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS This study included 622 patients who underwent a lumbar discectomy. A total of 610 opioid prescriptions were dispensed for this population after surgery. In total, 126 patients (20.3%) had at least one opioid prescription in the period beyond 90 days following their surgery. The majority of opioid prescriptions, 494 of 610 (81%), were non-inpatient prescriptions. Among these, only a minority (26%) of outpatient opioid prescriptions were written by surgical providers. Following multivariable Poisson regression analysis, surgical providers were found to have a lower likelihood of issuing an opioid prescription compared to nonsurgical clinicians (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.89; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A minority of lumbar discectomy patients continue to receive opioid prescriptions up to 15 months after surgery. Many of these prescriptions are written by nonsurgical providers unaffiliated with the operative team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chason Ziino
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya V Karhade
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mitchel B Harris
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Striano BM, Xiong GX, Lightsey HM, Crawford AM, Pisano AJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Interbody Fusion Techniques and the Influence of Patient and Procedural Factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:1669-1675. [PMID: 34610614 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to elucidate the relative influence of multiple factors on radiation usage for anterior, lateral, and posterior based lumbar interbody fusion techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There has been substantial global growth in the performance of lumbar interbody fusions, due to evolution of techniques and approaches and increased attention to sagittal alignment. Utilization of intraoperative imaging guidance has similarly expanded, with a predominance of fluoroscopy and consequent increased radiation exposure. There have been no larger-scale studies examining the role of patient and procedural factors in driving radiation exposure across different interbody techniques. METHODS We used a clinical registry to review all single-level lumbar interbody fusions performed between January 2016 and October 2020. Operative records were reviewed for the amount of radiation exposure during the procedure. Patient age, biologic sex, body mass index (BMI), operative surgeon, surgical level, surgical time, and fusion technique were recorded. Multivariable adjusted analyses using negative binomial regression were used to account for confounding. RESULTS We included 134 interbody fusions; 80 performed with a posterior approach (TLIF/PLIF), 43 via an anterior approach (ALIF) with posterior pedicle fixation, and 9 performed with a lateral approach (LLIF/XLIF). Average radiation per case was 136.4 mGy (SE 17.3) for ALIF, 108.6 mGy (16.9) for LLIF/XLIF, and 60.5 mGy (7.4) for TLIF/PLIF. We identified lateral approaches, increased BMI, minimally invasive techniques, and more caudal operative levels as significantly associated with increased radiation exposure. CONCLUSION We identified several novel drivers of radiation exposure during interbody fusion procedures, including the relative importance of technique and the level at which the fusion is performed. More caudal levels of intervention and lateral based techniques had significantly greater radiation exposure.Level of Evidence: 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan M Striano
- Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, M
| | - Grace X Xiong
- Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, M
| | - Harry M Lightsey
- Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, M
| | - Alexander M Crawford
- Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, M
| | - Alfred J Pisano
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wynn MS, Kesler KK, Bertroche E, Pugely AJ, Igram C. Patient specific predictive factors of vertebral artery injury following blunt cervical spine trauma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 210:106988. [PMID: 34678555 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine patient and injury characteristics predictive of vascular injury (VAI) in blunt cervical spine (BCS) trauma to identify high-risk patients and propose an alternative screening protocol. METHODS Patients presenting between 2014 and 2018 with BCS injury and cervical spine CT imaging were included. Demographics and injury characteristics of BCS injuries were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses to determine risk factors for VAI were performed. Once factors associated with greater odds of VAI were identified, this information was used to create an alternative protocol for indicating CTA in patients who sustained BCS injury. RESULTS A total of 475 patients were included. CTA of the neck was performed in 55.5% patients. In patients who received CTA, 18.2% had a contraindication to receiving anti-platelet therapy, and 25% were already receiving anti-coagulation therapy as an outpatient medication. VAI was found in 13.2% patients. In patients with VAI, 48.5% were already receiving anti-coagulation as outpatient medication. Acute kidney injury was found in 10.5% patients who had received CTA. Factors associated with greater odds of having VAI included transverse foramen involvement(p = 0.0001), subluxation/displacement/dislocation of fracture(p = 0.03), high energy mechanism(p = 0.02), SLIC score > 4(p = 0.04), and concomitant lumbar spine injury(p = 0.03). Using Modified Hawkeye Protocol, 40.2% of patients were indicated to receive a CTA, and 17 VAI were identified. Compared to Denver Criteria, CTAs were performed in 73 less patients(p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Updated protocols utilizing evidence-based clinical parameters to predict chance of VAI may avoid unnecessary advanced imaging and contrast load to patients in the setting of BCS trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malynda S Wynn
- University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics, Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Iowa City, IA, United States.
| | - Kyle K Kesler
- University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics, Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Eric Bertroche
- University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics, Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Andrew J Pugely
- University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics, Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Cassim Igram
- University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics, Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Iowa City, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morishita S, Yoshii T, Inose H, Hirai T, Yuasa M, Matsukura Y, Ogawa T, Fushimi K, Okawa A, Fujiwara T. Comparison of Perioperative Complications in Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E425-E431. [PMID: 34039894 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study with a national inpatient database. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to research the perioperative complication rates of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients who underwent anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) using a large national inpatient database and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There are several ways to successfully achieve surgical spinal decompression in CSM patients; however, evidence of the systemic complications and reoperation rates in ADF and PDF is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified patients who were hospitalized for CSM and underwent either ADF or PDF from 2010 to 2016 using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. In the ADF and PDF groups, we compared postoperative complications (systemic and local), medical costs during hospitalization, and mortality before and after PSM. In addition, multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for perioperative systemic complications. RESULTS A total of 1013 matched pairs were made after PSM. More perioperative systemic complications were detected in the ADF group than in the PDF group (at least 1 complication: ADF vs. PDF: 15.2% vs. 12.0%, P=0.038), especially for respiratory failure (1.4% vs. 0.4%, P=0.018), pneumonia (1.9% vs. 0.5%, P=0.004), and dysphagia (3.0% vs. 1.1%, P=0.003). The costs were ~$8000 higher (P<0.001) and the length of hospital stay was almost 5 days longer (P<0.001) in the PDF group. The risk factors for perioperative systemic complications in ADF were high age, low body mass index, and preoperative respiratory disease, and the factors in PDF were high body mass index and preoperative renal disease. CONCLUSION More systemic complications, especially respiratory events, were more frequently observed in the ADF group, while the medical costs were higher and the hospital stay was longer in the PDF group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Takeo Fujiwara
- Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Xiong G, Greene NE, Lightsey HM, Crawford AM, Striano BM, Simpson AK, Schoenfeld AJ. Telemedicine Use in Orthopaedic Surgery Varies by Race, Ethnicity, Primary Language, and Insurance Status. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:1417-1425. [PMID: 33982979 PMCID: PMC8208394 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare disparities are well documented across multiple subspecialties in orthopaedics. The widespread implementation of telemedicine risks worsening these disparities if not carefully executed, despite original assumptions that telemedicine improves overall access to care. Telemedicine also poses unique challenges such as potential language or technological barriers that may alter previously described patterns in orthopaedic disparities. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES Are the proportions of patients who use telemedicine across orthopaedic services different among (1) racial and ethnic minorities, (2) non-English speakers, and (3) patients insured through Medicaid during a 10-week period after the implementation of telemedicine in our healthcare system compared with in-person visits during a similar time period in 2019? METHODS This was a retrospective comparative study using electronic medical record data to compare new patients establishing orthopaedic care via outpatient telemedicine at two academic urban medical centers between March 2020 and May 2020 with new orthopaedic patients during the same 10-week period in 2019. A total of 11,056 patients were included for analysis, with 1760 in the virtual group and 9296 in the control group. Unadjusted analyses demonstrated patients in the virtual group were younger (median age 57 years versus 59 years; p < 0.001), but there were no differences with regard to gender (56% female versus 56% female; p = 0.66). We used self-reported race or ethnicity as our primary independent variable, with primary language and insurance status considered secondarily. Unadjusted and multivariable adjusted analyses were performed for our primary and secondary predictors using logistic regression. We also assessed interactions between race or ethnicity, primary language, and insurance type. RESULTS After adjusting for age, gender, subspecialty, insurance, and median household income, we found that patients who were Hispanic (odds ratio 0.59 [95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.91]; p = 0.02) or Asian were less likely (OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.53 to 0.99]; p = 0.04) to be seen through telemedicine than were patients who were white. After controlling for confounding variables, we also found that speakers of languages other than English or Spanish were less likely to have a telemedicine visit than were people whose primary language was English (OR 0.34 [95% CI 0.18 to 0.65]; p = 0.001), and that patients insured through Medicaid were less likely to be seen via telemedicine than were patients who were privately insured (OR 0.83 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.98]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Despite initial promises that telemedicine would help to bridge gaps in healthcare, our results demonstrate disparities in orthopaedic telemedicine use based on race or ethnicity, language, and insurance type. The telemedicine group was slightly younger, which we do not believe undermines the findings. As healthcare moves toward increased telemedicine use, we suggest several approaches to ensure that patients of certain racial, ethnic, or language groups do not experience disparate barriers to care. These might include individual patient- or provider-level approaches like expanded telemedicine schedules to accommodate weekends and evenings, institutional investment in culturally conscious outreach materials such as advertisements on community transport systems, or government-level provisions such as reimbursement for telephone-only encounters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Xiong
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nattaly E Greene
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harry M Lightsey
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander M Crawford
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brendan M Striano
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Crawford AM, Lightsey HM, Xiong GX, Striano BM, Pisano AJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Variability and contributions to cost associated with anterior versus posterior approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 206:106688. [PMID: 34015696 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lumbar interbody fusions are being performed with increased frequency in the last decade. Anterior and posterior interbody techniques have demonstrated relatively similar success rates. Nonetheless, despite increased attention to cost-effective care delivery, approach-related differences in procedural cost and predictors for these differences remain poorly defined. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the variability in cost for anterior versus posterior-based lumbar interbody fusions and to identify key predictors of procedural cost. METHODS We evaluated the records of all patients who underwent a primary anterior (ALIF) or posterior/transforaminal (PLIF/TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion with concomitant posterior fusion from 2016 to 2020 at four hospitals in a major metropolitan area. We reviewed the records of all included patients and abstracted demographics, insurance status, approach, operative time, diagnosis, surgeon, institution, open versus minimally invasive technique, and components of procedural costs. Costs based upon interbody approach were compared via multivariable adjusted analyses using negative binomial regression. RESULTS We included 139 interbody fusion procedures; 98 were performed via posterior approach (TLIF/PLIF) and 41 using an anterior approach. Anterior techniques were associated with significantly increased costs as compared to posterior procedures (anterior, $16316 [SE 556] vs. posterior, $9415 [SE 345]; p < 0.001). This determination remained significant following multivariable adjusted analysis (regression coefficient -0.22, 95% CI -0.34, -0.10, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis also indicated that surgeon, invasiveness, and procedure time were significant predictors of total cost. CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate that anterior interbody techniques are, on average, 173% (anterior, $16316 [SE 556] vs. posterior, $9415 [SE 345]; p < 0.001) more expensive than posterior-based procedures. Given the relative equipoise of these different approaches for many clinical applications, these findings should be considered in an ecosystem increasingly attentive to cost effective care delivery. This work has also provided specific procedural variables for surgeons and systems to target when optimizing procedural costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Crawford
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harry M Lightsey
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Grace X Xiong
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brendan M Striano
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alfred J Pisano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dunn CJ, Changoor S, Issa K, Moore J, Moontasri NJ, Faloon MJ, Sinha K, Hwang KS, Ruoff M, Emami A. Cervical Computed Tomography Angiography Rarely Leads to Intervention in Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures. Global Spine J 2020; 10:992-997. [PMID: 32875840 PMCID: PMC7645098 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219885897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the management of trauma patients with cervical spine fractures by identifying high-risk patients for vertebral artery injury (VAI), and evaluating how frequently patients undergo subsequent surgical/procedural intervention as a result of these findings. METHODS All trauma patients with cervical spine fractures who underwent CTA of the head and neck at our institution between January 2013 and October 2017 were identified. Patients were indicated for CTA according to our institutional protocol based on the modified Denver criteria, and included patients with cervical fractures on scout CT. Those with positive VAI were noted, along with their fracture location, and presence or absence of neurological deficit on physical examination. Statistical analysis was performed and odds ratios were calculated comparing the relationship of cervical spine fracture with presence of VAI. RESULTS A total of 144 patients were included in our study. Of those, 25 patients (17.4%) were found to have VAI. Two patients (1.4%) with VAI underwent subsequent surgical/procedural intervention. Of the 25 cervical fractures with a VAI, 20 (80%), were found to involve the upper cervical region (4.2 OR, 95% CI 1.5-12.0; P = .007). Of the 25 who had a VAI, 9 were unable to undergo reliable neurologic examination. Of the remaining 16 patients, 5 (31.3%) had motor or sensory deficits localized to the side of the VAI, with no other attributable etiology. CONCLUSIONS Cervical spine fractures located in the region of the C1-C3 vertebrae were more likely to have an associated VAI on CTA. VAI should also be considered in cervical trauma patients who present with neurological deficits not clearly explained by other pathology. Despite a finding of VAI, patients rarely underwent subsequent surgical or procedural intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor John Dunn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
| | - Stuart Changoor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
| | - Kimona Issa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
| | - Jeffrey Moore
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
| | - Nancy J. Moontasri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
| | - Michael Joseph Faloon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Kumar Sinha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
| | - Ki Soo Hwang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
| | - Mark Ruoff
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
| | - Arash Emami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph’s University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA
- Arash Emami, University Spine Center, 504 Valley Road, Suite 203, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vehviläinen J, Brinck T, Lindfors M, Numminen J, Siironen J, Raj R. Occurrence and prognostic effect of cervical spine injuries and cervical artery injuries with concomitant severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162:1445-1453. [PMID: 32157398 PMCID: PMC7235059 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04279-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) and cervical spinal injuries (CSIs) are not uncommon injuries in patients with severe head injury and may affect patient recovery. We aimed to assess the independent relationship between BCVI, CSI, and outcome in patients with severe head injury. METHODS We identified patients with severe head injury from the Helsinki Trauma Registry treated during 2015-2017 in a large level 1 trauma hospital. We assessed the association between BCVI and SCI using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for injury severity. Our primary outcome was functional outcome at 6 months, and our secondary outcome was 6-month mortality. RESULTS Of 255 patients with a cervical spine CT, 26 patients (10%) had a CSI, and of 194 patients with cervical CT angiography, 16 patients (8%) had a BCVI. Four of the 16 BCVI patients had a BCVI-related brain infarction, and four of the CSI patients had some form of spinal cord injury. After adjusting for injury severity in multivariable logistic regression analysis, BCVI associated with poor functional outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 6.0, 95% CI [confidence intervals] = 1.4-26.5) and mortality (OR = 7.9, 95% CI 2.0-31.4). We did not find any association between CSI and outcome. CONCLUSIONS We found that BCVI with concomitant head injury was an independent predictor of poor outcome in patients with severe head injury, but we found no association between CSI and outcome after severe head injury. Whether the association between BCVI and poor outcome is an indirect marker of a more severe injury or a result of treatment needs further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juho Vehviläinen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, PO. Box 266, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuomas Brinck
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matias Lindfors
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, PO. Box 266, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jussi Numminen
- Department of Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jari Siironen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, PO. Box 266, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Rahul Raj
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, PO. Box 266, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lipa SA, Greene N, Reyes AM, Blucher JA, Makhni MC, Simpson AK, Harris MB, Schoenfeld AJ. Prognostic value of laboratory values in older patients with cervical spine fractures. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 194:105781. [PMID: 32278269 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand the prognostic value of laboratory markers at presentation on post-treatment survival of patients 50 and older following cervical spine fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS We obtained clinical data on patients 50 and older treated for cervical spine fracture in a single healthcare system (2006-2016). Our primary outcome consisted of 1-year mortality, with mortality within 3-months of presentation considered secondarily. Our primary predictors included serum glucose, serum creatinine, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at presentation. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding from sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Point estimates and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) from the final model were refined using Bayesian regression techniques. RESULTS We included 1781 patients in this analysis, with an average age of 75.3 (SD 12.0). The mortality rate at 3-months was 12 % and 17 % at 1-year. In multivariable testing, neither elevated PLR or NLR were significant predictors of 1-year mortality. Elevated serum creatinine was associated with increased mortality at 1-year (OR 1.89; 95 % CI 1.30, 2.74), as was hyperglycemia (OR 1.50; 95 % CI 1.06, 2.13). Elevated serum creatinine remained influential (OR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.06, 2.54) on mortality at 3-months. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to evaluate laboratory values at presentation in conjunction with survival following cervical fractures. The results can be used to help forecast natural history and in expectation management. They may also help formulate treatment plans, especially when the need for surgical intervention is not clearly defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaina A Lipa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Nattaly Greene
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Angel M Reyes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Justin A Blucher
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Melvin C Makhni
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Mitchel B Harris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pizetta GR, Maçaneiro CH, Lauffer RF, Miyamoto RK, Ferreira APB, Santos RAAD. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SPINAL CORD INJURY IN THE CITY OF JOINVILLE (SC). COLUNA/COLUMNA 2020. [DOI: 10.1590/s1808-185120201901223272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective This paper proposes a retrospective analysis of the spinal cord trauma at a regional hospital that is a Unified Health System (SUS) reference in Orthopedics and Traumatology, considering epidemiological data and comparing treatments and hospitalization costs. Methods This study is a retrospective, analytical-descriptive, exploratory documental analysis, using data from the medical records of patients treated for spinal cord trauma during 2016 at the São José Municipal Hospital (Joinville, SC). Results Twenty-three patients were included in the study, 20 of whom (87%) were male. As to etiology, traffic accidents accounted for 47.8% of the cases and gunshot wounds were in second place with 26.1% of the injuries. The correlation between the cost of hospitalization and the days of hospitalization was statistically significant (p = 0.013), as was the correlation between the cost of hospitalization and the number of procedures (p = 0.000). Conclusions Surgical treatment demands greater amounts of financial and human resources. The purpose of this study is to provide local epidemiological data to encourage discussion about other studies, as well as planning for resource allocation and public policy. Level of evidence II; Retrospective Study.
Collapse
|
22
|
Orlowski HL, Kansagra AP, Miller-Thomas MM, Vo KD, Goyal MS. Response Letter Regarding “Utility of CT angiography in screening for traumatic cerebrovascular injury”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 181:53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
The Impact of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Standard Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44:E366-E371. [PMID: 30830037 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To assess whether administration of prophylactic vancomycin, in addition to cefazolin decreased revision surgeries for postoperative infection (SSI) as well as the need for revisions overall. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA In 2010 our institution implemented an antibiotic prophylaxis regimen consisting of intravenous vancomycin and cefazolin that applied to all patients receiving surgical implants. The impact of this change in prophylactic antibiotic regimen on SSIs following instrumented spinal fusions remains unknown. METHODS We conducted a prepost analysis evaluating the effect of the change in antibiotic prophylaxis on SSIs following instrumented spinal fusions. We collected data on all eligible patients over the course of 2005 to 2009 and 2011 to 2015. We used logistic regression techniques to evaluate unadjusted results for the prophylactic antibiotic protocol on all revision surgeries, as well as those for SSI, followed by sequential adjustments for sociodemographic factors and surgical characteristics. RESULTS Revision surgeries performed for a diagnosis of infection were reduced from a rate of 4% (n = 57) in the period 2005 to 2009 to 2% (n = 44) over 2011 to 2015 (P < 0.001). At the same time, the incidence of revision surgeries for any cause was also reduced (14% in 2005-2009 vs. 9% in 2011-2015; P < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, the odds of a revision procedure for SSI were reduced by 50% following introduction of the protocol (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33, 0.76). No significant difference in the organisms responsible for SSI was identified between 2005 and 2009 and 2011 and 2015 (P = 0.22). CONCLUSION This natural experiment has shown some utility for a preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimen of vancomycin and cefazolin, including meaningful reductions in revision procedures performed for SSI. This is the first effort we are aware of to consider a uniform institutional protocol that employs the use of intravenous vancomycin and cefazolin as prophylactic agents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2.
Collapse
|
24
|
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Screening and Diagnosis. CURRENT TRAUMA REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40719-019-0153-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|