Preoperative Radiographic Osteoarthritis Severity Modifies the Effect of Preoperative Pain on Pain/Function After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results at 1 and 2 Years Postoperatively

Patient Selection in Randomized Controlled Trials of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Assessing Inclusion Criteria

BACKGROUND

Patients undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at widely disparate stages of osteoarthritis, raising the possibility of high heterogeneity among patients enrolled in TKA research studies. Obscuration of treatment effectiveness and other problems that may stem from cohort heterogeneity can be controlled in clinical studies by rigorously defining target patients. The purpose of this review was to determine the extent to which randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TKA use osteoarthritis severity, as defined by radiographic grade or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), in their inclusion criteria, and to investigate potential impact on outcome.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases used a combination of terms involving TKA, PROMs, and radiographic scoring. A total of 1,227 studies were independently reviewed by 2 screeners for the above terms. RCTs with ≥100 patients (236) and with <100 patients (325) undergoing TKA were analyzed with regard to the specific inclusion criteria and recruitment process.

RESULTS

Among the identified RCTs with ≥100 patients, 18 (<8%, with a total of 2,952 randomized patients) used specific radiographic scoring or PROM thresholds in their inclusion criteria. Eleven of the 18 studies used specific radiographic scoring, such as the Kellgren-Lawrence or Ahlbäck classifications. Three studies used preoperative PROM thresholds: Knee Society Knee Score of <60, Knee Society Function Score of <60, Oxford Knee Score of <20, and Hospital for Special Surgery Score of <60. Among studies with <100 patients, 48 (<15%) used specific inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of RCTs (>85%) did not enroll patients based on disease severity, as measured by PROM score thresholds or radiographic classifications, in their inclusion criteria. The lack of consistent inclusion criteria likely results in heterogeneous cohorts, potentially undermining the validity of RCTs on TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Three out of four working-age patients have fulfilled expectations towards paid employment six months after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a multicentre cohort study

To investigate factors associated with fulfilment of expectations towards paid employment after total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Cohort study including preoperatively employed patients aged 18-64 scheduled for THA/TKA. Expectations were collected preoperatively, and 6 and 12 months postoperatively with the paid employment item of the Hospital-for-Special-Surgery Expectations Surveys (back-to-normal = 1; large improvement = 2; moderate improvement = 3; slight improvement = 4; not applicable = 5). Patients scoring not applicable were excluded. Fulfilment was calculated by subtracting preoperative from postoperative scores (< 0: unfulfilled; ≥ 0: fulfilled). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted separately for THA/TKA at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Six months postoperatively, 75% of THA patients (n = 237/n = 316) and 72% of TKA patients (n = 211/n = 294) had fulfilled expectations. Older age (TKA:OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15) and better postoperative physical functioning (THA:OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.14; TKA:OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06) increased the likelihood of fulfilment. Physical work tasks (THA:OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.44), preoperative sick leave (TKA:OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.65), and difficulties at work (THA:OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.35; TKA:OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.98) decreased the likelihood of fulfilment. Twelve months postoperatively similar risk factors were found. Three out of four working-age THA/TKA patients had fulfilled expectations towards paid employment at 6 months postoperatively. Preoperative factors associated with fulfilment were older age, mental work tasks, no sick leave, postoperative factors were better physical functioning, and no perceived difficulties at work.

Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for chronic post-surgical pain after total knee arthroplasty considering biopsychosocial factors: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Biopsychosocial factors are involved in the occurrence of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to develop a clinical prediction rule (CPR) that considers biopsychosocial factors to predict which patients are more likely to develop CPSP after TKA.

METHODS

CPSP after TKA was dichotomized into CPSP and non-CPSP groups using the Likert scale and Minimal clinically important difference, and binomial logistic regression analysis was performed. Cut-off values were then calculated using the extracted factors and dichotomized variables. The cut-off values and dichotomized variables were then used to derive a CPR that discriminates between groups with and without CPSP.

RESULTS

Seventy-one TKA patients were included in the study. Binomial logistic regression analysis revealed that Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were associated with CPSP. The cut-off values for CSI and PSQI were 26 and 7, respectively. The CPSP scale was created using the cut-off values of CSI and PSQI, with a score of 0 for being below the cut-off values of both CSI and PSQI, 1 for being above the cut-off values of either CSI or PSQI, and 2 for being above the cut-off values of both CSI and PSQI. Furthermore, the area under the curve (AUC) for CPR created by the presence of CPSP and using the CPSP scale was significant (AUC = 0.766; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combination of the two tests, CSI and PSQI, suggested the possibility of predicting CPSP after TKA.

Similar short-term KOOS between open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty in patients over age 60: A propensity score-matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate improvement in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in comparison with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in cohorts over age 60 matched by pre-operative age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), KOOS sub-scores, and osteoarthritis (OA) grade.

METHODS

Propensity score matching was performed between 162 HTO patients and 134 TKA patients. When calculating the propensity score by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following pre-operative confounders were included: age, gender, BMI, HKAA, KOOS sub-scores, and OA grade. Consequently, a total of 55 patients were included in each group. The Student's t-test was used to analyse differences in the post-operative KOOS sub-scores between groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, all matched pre-operative valuables were identical, with no significant differences between the HTO and TKA groups. None of the post-operative KOOS sub-scores at 1 year after surgery showed a significant difference between the HTO and TKA groups. Both groups demonstrated significant and comparable post-operative improvement in every KOOS sub-score.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients over age 60, there was no significant difference in short-term pain relief and improvements in activity and quality of life between HTO and TKA after propensity score matching including pre-operative age, KOOS sub-scores, and OA grade. HTO is a joint preservation procedure that is valid for knee OA even in individuals over age 60.

Selective Patella Resurfacing in Contemporary Cruciate Retaining and Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity.

METHODS

A total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135).

CONCLUSION

In contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Patients With Mild Osteoarthritis Are Less Likely to Achieve a Clinically Important Improvement in Pain or Function After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The severity of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) as demonstrated by preoperative radiographs and patient-reported pain plays an important role in the indication for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). In hip and knee research, data about the effect of the severity of preoperative radiographic OA on the outcome of total joint arthroplasty have been mixed. For shoulder replacement, we are unsure of the effects of radiographic severity on outcomes.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This study investigated whether the preoperative radiographic severity of glenohumeral OA is associated with improvement in pain and function after aTSA. We asked, (1) does the severity of glenohumeral OA correlate with improvement in patient-reported outcomes after TSA (delta American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score [postoperative-preoperative], delta Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, delta Simple Shoulder Test, and delta VAS)? (2) Is having mild osteoarthritis associated with not meeting the minimum clinically important differences in preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores?

METHODS

An institutional query of patients who underwent aTSA for OA was performed between January 2015 and December 2018. A total of 1035 patients were eligible; however, only patients with adequate preoperative radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively were included. Patients with proximal humerus fractures, inflammatory arthropathy, cuff tear arthropathy, prior ipsilateral rotator cuff repair, brachial plexus injury or neuromuscular disorder, workers compensation, periprosthetic joint infection, or revision surgery within 2 years were excluded. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and prior shoulder surgery were recorded. The severity of OA was classified based on the modified Samilson-Prieto and Walch classification. The association between Samilson-Prieto grade and patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and VAS score) was evaluated. Radiographic characteristics, patient demographics, comorbidities, and prior surgery were also evaluated for the potential risk of not achieving improvement in the minimum clinically important difference (16.1) with respect to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score is scored 0 to 100, with higher scores representing less pain and better function. A total of 206 patients (20% of those eligible) with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years were included. Twenty-three patients had Samilson-Prieto Grade I, 38 had Grade II, 57 had Grade III, and 88 had Grade IV.

RESULTS

There were no differences in improvements (delta) between the groups and between patient-reported outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and VAS). Compared with patients with more severe osteoarthritis (Samilson-Prieto Grades II, III, and IV), a higher proportion of patients with less severe osteoarthritis (Grade I) did not exceed the minimum clinical important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (22% [five of 23] versus 4% [seven of 183]; odds ratio 0.14 [95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.520]; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The improvement in patient-reported outcome measure scores was similar regardless of radiographic severity after aTSA. Surgeons should use caution when recommending surgery to patients with less severe OA because a higher percentage did not improve, based on the minimum clinically important difference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Prior Meniscectomy in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Worse Short-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who have prior meniscectomy may have increased rates of postoperative infection, arthrofibrosis, and revision. However, aside from an increased risk of complications, it is unclear whether prior meniscectomy impacts functional outcomes after TKA. This study was conducted to compare functional outcomes following TKA in patients who did and did not have a prior meniscectomy. We hypothesized that patients who had a prior ipsilateral meniscectomy would have worse functional outcomes after undergoing TKA.

METHODS

A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. Patients who underwent both meniscectomy and TKA (cases) or TKA alone (controls) from 2013 to 2020 were identified from our institutional database using current procedural terminology codes. Cases were matched in a 1:3 ratio to controls using age, sex, race, body mass index, and a comorbidity index. Inclusion criteria comprised a minimum of 1-year follow-up for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (KOOS-JR). Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing revision TKA and patients who had a history of ligamentous knee surgery or fracture. T- and Chi-squared analyses were conducted, with significance threshold being P < .05. A total of 589 cases and 1,767 controls were included after matching. There were no significant differences in demographic variables. Cases underwent TKA after their meniscectomy at a mean of 2.9 years (range: 42 days to 16 years).

RESULTS

While no significant difference existed for preoperative KOOS-JR scores (46.4 versus 46.4; P = .984), postoperative KOOS-JR scores were significantly lower in the case group (71.9 versus 75.3; P = .001). The case group also achieved the KOOS-JR minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at significantly lower rates than the control group [(MCID: 71.0 versus 77.3%; P = .011) (PASS: 69.4 versus 76.7%; P = .001);].

CONCLUSION

Patients who had a prior meniscectomy may experience lower postoperative functional outcome scores after TKA and had a lower rate of achieving the MCID and PASS for KOOS-JR. Patient expectations should be adjusted accordingly.

Mitochondrial function, grip strength, and activity are related to recovery of mobility after a total knee arthroplasty

Low muscle quality and a sedentary lifestyle are indicators for a slow recovery after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mitochondrial function is an important part of muscle quality and a key driver of sarcopenia. However, it is not known whether it relates to recovery. In this pilot study, we monitored activity after TKA using a wrist mounted activity tracker and assessed the relation of mitochondrial function on the rate of recovery after TKA. Additionally, we compared the increase in activity as a way to measure recovery to traditional outcome measures. Patients were studied 2 weeks before TKA and up to 6 months after. Activity was monitored continuously. Baseline mitochondrial function (citrate synthase and complex [CP] 1-5 abundance of the electron transport chain) was determined on muscle tissue taken during TKA. Traditional outcome measures (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], timed up-and-go [TUG] completion time, grip, and quadriceps strength) were performed 2 weeks before, 6 weeks after, and 6 months after TKA. Using a multivariate regression model with various clinical baseline parameters, the following were significantly related to recovery: CP5 abundance, grip strength, and activity (regression weights 0.13, 0.02, and 2.89, respectively). During recovery, activity correlated to the KOOS-activities of daily living (ADL) score (r = 0.55, p = 0.009) and TUG completion time (r = -0.61, p = 0.001). Mitochondrial function seems to be related to recovery, but so are activity and grip strength, all indicators of sarcopenia. Using activity trackers before and after TKA might give the surgeon valuable information on the expected recovery and the opportunity to intervene if recovery is low.

Do symptoms of anxiety and/or depression and pain intensity before primary Total knee arthroplasty influence reason for revision? Results of an observational study from the Dutch arthroplasty register in 56,233 patients

OBJECTIVE

Anxiety, depression and greater pain intensity before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may increase the probability of revision surgery for remaining symptoms even without clear pathology or technical issues. We aimed to assess whether preoperative anxiety/depression and pain intensity are associated with revision TKA for less clear indications.

METHODS

Less clear indications for revision were defined after a Delphi process in which consensus was reached among 59 orthopaedic knee experts. We performed a cox regression analyses on primary TKA patients registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (LROI) who completed the EuroQol 5D 3 L (EQ5D-3 L) anxiety/depression score to examine associations between preoperative anxiety/depression and pain (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)) with TKA revision for less clear reasons. These analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, sex, smoking, ASA score, EQ5D-3 L thermometer and OKS score.

RESULTS

In total, 25.9% patients of the 56,233 included patients reported moderate or severe symptoms of anxiety/depression on the EQ5D-3 L anxiety/depression score. Of those, 615 revisions (45.5%) were performed for less clear reasons for revision (patellar pain, malalignment, instability, progression of osteoarthritis or arthrofibrosis). Not EQ5D-3 L anxiety/depression score, but higher NRS pain at rest and EQ5D-3 L pain score were associated with revision for less clear reason (HR: 1.058, 95% CI 1.019-1.099 & HR: 1.241, 95% CI 1.044-1.476, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that pain intensity is a risk factor for TKA revision for a less clear reason. The finding that preoperative pain intensity was associated with reason for revision confirms a likely influence of subjective, personal factors on offer and acceptance of TKA revision. The association between anxiety/depression and reason for revision after TKA may also be found when including more specific outcome measures to assess anxiety/depression and we therefore hope to encourage further research on this topic with our study, ideally in a prospective setting.

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal Cohort Study Level III, Delphi Consensus.

Factors Correlated With Physical Function 1 Year After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

More than 1 in 5 patients do not experience improved physical function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Identification of factors associated with physical function may be warranted to improve outcomes in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To identify preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with physical function at 12 months after TKA in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Data from January 2000 to October 2021 were searched in Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). No language restrictions were applied.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective observational studies or randomized clinical trials on factors associated with physical function after TKA in adult patients with osteoarthritis were selected. A prespecified peer-reviewed protocol was followed.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline, 2 reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and judged risk of bias using Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS). Multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate mean correlations between factors and physical function with 95% CIs. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for each QUIPS domain. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was physical function 12 months after TKA. Secondary outcomes were physical function 3 and 6 months after TKA. All estimates are mean correlations between factors and postoperative function. Positive correlations correspond to better function.

RESULTS

Among 12 052 articles, 20 studies (including 11 317 patients and 37 factors) were analyzed. Mean correlation with higher BMI was estimated to be -0.15 (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.05; P = .33; moderate-certainty evidence), while mean correlation with better physical function was estimated to be 0.14 (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.26; P = .03; low-certainty evidence) and mean correlation with more severe osteoarthritis was estimated to be 0.10 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.19; P = .17; high-certainty evidence). In sensitivity analyses, mean correlation with better physical function was estimated to be 0.20 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.36; P = .02), and so perhaps a larger coefficient than in the main analysis, while mean correlations were estimated to be similar for other factors (BMI: -0.17; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.06; P < .001; osteoarthritis severity: 0.10; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.20; P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that higher presurgical BMI was correlated with worse physical function (with moderate certainty) and that better physical function (low certainty) and osteoarthritis severity (high certainty) were correlated with better physical function after TKA. These findings suggest that these factors should be included when testing predictive models of TKA outcomes.

Osteoarthritic Severity in Unresurfaced Patellae Does Not Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes in Contemporary Primary TKA

Introduction:

The degree of osteoarthritis (OA) acceptable to leave in a native patella during unresurfaced total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. This study's purpose was to examine the effect of patellofemoral OA severity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing.

Methods:

One hundred ninety-three primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patellofemoral OA severity was graded on severity, marginal osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and chondral damage using accepted grading systems. Patellar tilt and tibiofemoral alignment were measured radiographically. PROMs were evaluated at a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Results:

In multivariate regression, preoperative lateral patella Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 was associated with superior change in Knee Society Score pain with level walking, higher absolute change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (P ≤ 0.029), and knees ‟always feeling normal” (odds ratio [OR] 3.12; P = 0.005). Osteoarthritis Research Society International atlas grades and Outerbridge classification scores did not significantly influence PROMs.

Discussion:

Worse preoperative OA severity in the lateral patellar facet, graded with the Kellgren-Lawrence system, predicted superior knee-specific PROMs in patients with unresurfaced patellae after contemporary TKA. This observation supports the clinical finding that patients with more severe OA have optimized patient outcomes and highlights the minimal contribution of patella OA to knee function after primary TKA.

Mild radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with increased pain and dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty when compared with severe osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The association between severity of radiographic osteoarthritis with patient pain, function, and satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty has been disputed. The discrepancies in current literature prompt us to further examine this association in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The OVID-Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception up to Mar 2020. The main independent variable was osteoarthritis severity as defined by preoperative radiographs. The outcomes measured were pain, function and satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty. A minimum of three studies assessing the same patient-reported outcome measures were included in the meta-analysis, as well as those separating patients by chronic pain or dissatisfaction.

RESULTS

29 studies were included in this study. Significant heterogeneity was seen between radiographic evaluation and reported outcomes. Patients with only mild radiographic osteoarthritis were more likely to suffer from chronic pain (odds ratio = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.80-3.34, p < 0.001) and dissatisfaction (odds ratio = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.79-3.31, p < 0.001) compared to patients with severe osteoarthritis. A significant association was found between mild radiographic severity and lower total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis scores (95% CI = - 0.37-0.06, p = 0.006) as well as Knee Society Scores (CI: - 0.54-0.16, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with mild radiographic osteoarthritis are anticipated to gain less from total knee arthroplasty compared to those with severe osteoarthritis. They are also at risk for chronic pain and dissatisfaction and should be consulted about this risk prior to surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Radiographic Severity May Not be Associated with Pain and Function in Glenohumeral Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Despite the routine use of plain radiographs to stratify the severity of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, little is known about the relationship between radiographic measures and patient-perceived pain and function.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What radiographic findings are associated with worse pain and function in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis? (2) What demographic factors are associated with worse pain and function in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis?

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients presenting for an initial office visit for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients with other concurrent shoulder pathologic findings, prior surgery, lack of pain and functional scores, recent injection, or inadequate radiographs were excluded. Between January 2017 and January 2019, 3133 patients were eligible based on these inclusion criteria; 59% (1860) had outcome assessments and 48% (893) of those had radiographs. An additional 42% (378) of those with radiographs were excluded because of other shoulder findings, recent injection, prior surgery, or inadequate radiographs, leaving 16% (515 of 3133) who were fully analyzed in this study. A radiographic review included the joint space width, posterior humeral head subluxation, inferior humeral head osteophyte size, cystic change, and head asphericity. Additionally, radiographic arthritis was classified according to the Walch, Samilson-Prieto, and Kellgren-Lawrence classifications by two separate reviewers. Radiographic and demographic criteria as well as the presence of psychologic or mental illness were correlated with VAS Pain (range 1-10; minimal clinically important difference [MCID] 1.6), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES; range 0-100; MCID 13.6), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE; range 0-100; MCID 14), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST; range 0-12; MCID 1.5) scores using univariate and multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

After accounting for age, gender, and psychologic illness in the multivariable analysis, we found that patients with Samilson-Prieto Grade 4 arthrosis had lower VAS Pain scores (β = -1.9; p = 0.02) than those with Grade 0 or 1 did; however, no clinically important associations were found between Samilson-Prieto Grade 4 and ASES (β = 7; p = 0.25), SANE (β = 4; p = 0.63), or SST (β = 0.5; p = 0.62) scores. No clinically important associations were found between Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 and VAS Pain (β = 1.4; p = 0.10), ASES (β = -8; p = 0.22), SANE (β = -13; p = 0.11), or SST scores (β = 0.4; p = 0.66). Radiographic joint space and posterior subluxation also did not have any clinically important associations with VAS Pain or functional scores. In assessing Walch glenoid type, there was no clinically important association between glenoid type and VAS Pain (F = 3.1; p < 0.01), ASES (F = 1.9; p = 0.15), SANE (F = 0.45; p = 0.66), or SST scores (F = 0.76; p = 0.71). Men had higher SST scores than women did (β = 2.0; p < 0.01), but there were no clinically important differences in VAS Pain (β = -0.4; p = 0.04), ASES (β = 6; p < 0.01), or SANE (β = 4; p = 0.07) scores. No clinically important association was found between age or the presence of any psychologic illness and VAS Pain or functional scores.

CONCLUSION

In patients with glenohumeral arthritis, no consistent clinically important differences in pain or function were discovered with respect to radiographic or demographic factors. Surgeons should understand that the pain levels of patients with glenohumeral arthritis may not parallel radiographic severity. Future studies can build on these findings by examining other non-radiographic or demographic factors that affect pain in patients with shoulder arthritis, such as psychological factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: did it ever work?

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is one the most common orthopedic surgical procedures. The most common indication for APM is a degenerative meniscal tear (DMT). High-quality evidence suggests that APM does not provide meaningful benefits in patients with DMTs and may even be harmful in the longer term. This narrative review focuses on a fundamental question: considering the history and large number of these surgeries, has APM ever actually worked in patients with DMT? A truly effective treatment needs a valid disease model that would biologically and plausibly explain the perceived treatment benefits. In the case of DMT, effectiveness requires a credible framework for the pain-generating process, which should be influenced by APM. Basic research, pathoanatomy, and clinical evidence gives no support to these frameworks. Moreover, treatment of DMT with an APM does not align with the traditional practice of medicine since DMT is not a reliable diagnosis for knee pain and no evidence-based indication exists that would influence patient prognosis from APM. A plausible and robust explanation supported by both basic research and clinical evidence is that DMTs are part of an osteoarthritic disease process and do not contribute to the symptoms independently or in isolation and that symptoms are not treatable with APM. This is further supported by the fact that APM as an intervention is paradoxical because the extent of procedure and severity of disease are both inversely associated with outcome. We argue that arthroscopic treatment of DMT is largely based on a logical fallacy: post hoc ergo propter hoc.

Comparison of KOOS Scores of Middle-Aged Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty to the General Dutch Population Using KOOS Percentile Curves: The LOAS Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the application of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) percentile curves, using preoperative and postoperative data of patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We used Longitudinal Leiden Orthopedics Outcomes of Osteo-Arthritis study data of patients between 45 and 65 years and undergoing primary TKA. KOOS scores (0-100) were obtained preoperatively and 6, 12, and 24 months after TKA. Preoperative knee radiographs were assessed according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) in a subset (37%) of patients. Comorbidities were self-reported using a standardized questionnaire. The median (interquartile range) population-level KOOS scores were plotted on previously developed population-based KOOS percentile curves. In addition, we assessed the application of the curves on patient level and investigated differences in scores between patients with preoperative KL scores ≤2 and ≥3 and presence (vs absence) of comorbidities.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 853 patients (62% women, mean age 59 years, body mass index 30 kg/m²) with knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA. Preoperatively, median KOOS scores of all subscales were at or below the 2.5^th percentile. Scores increased to approximately the 25^th percentile 12 months postoperatively. Greater improvements were observed in pain and less improvements in sport and recreational function and quality of life. Patients with higher preoperative KL scores and without comorbidities showed greater improvements.

CONCLUSION

The KOOS percentile curves provided visual insights in knee complaints of patients relative to the general population. Furthermore, the KOOS percentile curves give insight in how preoperative patient characteristics are correlated with postoperative results.

Impact of sarcopenia on rehabilitation outcomes after total knee replacement in older adults with knee osteoarthritis

Introduction:

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is associated with an increased risk of sarcopenia, and aging-related muscle deterioration continues after total knee replacement (TKR). Low skeletal muscle mass index may influence postoperative rehabilitation outcomes. Through this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative sarcopenia on clinical outcomes after postoperative rehabilitation in older Asian adults.

Methods:

A total of 190 older adults (39 men, 151 women) were enrolled from two previous trials and were classified as having no sarcopenia, class I sarcopenia, or class II sarcopenia according to definitions provided by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). All patients were retrospectively analyzed before (T₀) and after (T₁) TKR rehabilitation and 10 months after surgery (T₂). The outcome measures included the timed up-and-go test (TUGT), gait speed (GS), timed chair rise (TCR), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical difficulty (WOMAC-PF). With patient characteristics and T₀ scores as covariates, an analysis of variance was performed to identify intergroup differences in changes of all outcome measures at T₁ and T₂.

Results:

According to the definitions of both the AWGS and EWGSOP, patients with class I and class II sarcopenia exhibited minor changes in TUGT, GS, TCR, and WOMAC-PF at T₁ and T₂ (all p < 0.05), compared with those without sarcopenia. For patients classified as having sarcopenia based on AWGS and EWGSOP definitions, no significant intergroup differences in WOMAC pain score was observed at T₁ or T₂ (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions:

Sarcopenia independently had negative impacts on the treatment effects of rehabilitation on physical mobility but not on pain outcome after TKR in older adults with KOA.

Which Preoperative Factors are Associated with Not Attaining Acceptable Levels of Pain and Function After TKA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Although TKA is a common and proven reliable procedure for treating end-stage knee osteoarthritis, a minority of patients still do not achieve satisfactory levels of pain relief and functional improvement. Even though several studies have attempted to identify patients at risk of having poor clinical outcomes, few have approached this issue by considering the outcome of the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), defined as the value on a patient-reported outcome measure scale above which the patient deems their current symptom state acceptable.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the proportion of patients who do not attain the PASS in pain and function at 1 year after TKA? (2) Which preoperative patient factors are associated with not achieving the PASS in pain at 1 year after TKA? (3) Which preoperative patient factors are associated with not achieving the PASS in function at 1 year after TKA?

METHODS

This retrospective study is a secondary analysis of the 1-year follow-up data from a prospective, international, multicenter study of a single TKA system. Inclusion criteria for that study were patients diagnosed with primary osteoarthritis or post-traumatic arthritis and who were able to return for follow-up for 10 years; exclusion criteria were infection, osteomyelitis, and failure of a previous joint replacement. Between 2011 and 2014, 449 patients underwent TKA at 10 centers in five countries. At 1 year, 13% (58 of 449) were lost to follow-up, 2% could not be analyzed (eight of 449; missing 1-year KOOS), leaving 85% (383 of 449) for analysis here. The primary outcomes were not surpassing evidence-derived PASS thresholds in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain and Activities in Daily Living (ADL) sub-scores. Multivariate binary logistic regressions considering preoperative demographic, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measure data were constructed using a forward stepwise elimination algorithm to reach the simplest best-fit regression models.

RESULTS

At 1 year after TKA, 38% of the patients (145 of 383) did not reach the PASS in KOOS Pain, 36% (139 of 383) did not reach the PASS in KOOS ADL, and 29% (110 of 383) did not achieve the PASS in either KOOS Pain or ADL. After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as gender, age, BMI, and comorbidity scores, we found that men (odds ratio 2.09; p = 0.01), and patients with less-than-advanced radiographic osteoarthritis (OR 2.09; p = 0.01) were strongly associated with not achieving the PASS in pain. After controlling for the same potentially confounding variables, we found that patients with less-than-advanced radiographic osteoarthritis (OR 2.09; p = 0.01) were also strongly associated with not achieving the PASS in function.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patients with less severe osteoarthritis were much less likely to attain the PASS in pain and function at 1 year after TKA, and that men were much less likely to achieve the PASS in pain at 1 year after TKA. Based on these findings, surgeons should strongly consider delaying surgery in patients who present with less-than-severe osteoarthritis, with increased caution in men. Surgeons should counsel their patients on their expectations and their chances of achieving meaningful levels of pain and functional improvement. Future regional and national registry studies should assess the true proportion of patients attaining PASS in pain and function after TKA and confirm if the preoperative factors identified in this study remain significant in larger, more diverse patient populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.