The Effect of Surgeon Preference for Selective Patellar Resurfacing on Revision Risk in Total Knee Replacement: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of 136,116 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Over a decade of experience in total knee arthroplasty with a multiradius design and fixed bearing at a single centre: Data from the Catalan Arthroplasty Registry

Purpose

Arthroplasty registers can provide feedback information on the results of arthroplasties performed by a certain institution or surgeon. The use of real-world data to achieve real-world evidence can help evaluate the performance of the implants used and help counsel our patients. The main objective of our study was to determine the survivorship of the total knee implant we are currently using.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients who received a total knee arthroplasty from January 2009 to December 2020 in our hospital was conducted, using data from the Catalan arthroplasty registry and the Catalan health service database. Demographic and surgical data were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models with the R Project software (p < 0.05).

Results

A total of 1336 total knee arthroplasties were included in the study, of which 992 were women. The causes for revision included aseptic loosening (17), infection (29), instability (13), patellar implantation (13), arthrofibrosis (5) and quadriceps tendon rupture (1).The cumulative risk for revision at 5 years using the Kaplan-Meier method was 6.0% and at 10 years 6.5%. Considering gender, this risk was 7.0% and 7.5% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, in women and 3.3% in men, both at 5 and 10 years (p = 0.009). A higher risk for revision in women was seen, which is considered statistically significant (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

Our survivorship results are comparable to those published in the literature, but with a higher revision risk in women that is only statistically significant for the whole group of reoperations and for patellar implantation, but not for the rest of the diagnoses.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Minimum 15-Year Survival of a Biconvex Inlay Patellar Component in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 2,530 Total Knee Arthroplasties From a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Routine patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. To our knowledge, there are no studies reporting the long-term performance of a cemented biconvex all-polyethylene inlay component implanted at the time of primary TKA. The purpose of this study was to examine the 15-year survivorship and long-term clinical outcomes of this biconvex inlay patella used at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected institutional database and identified 2,530 patients who underwent cemented TKA with a single prosthetic design (from 1996 to 2007) where the patella was resurfaced using this cemented biconvex inlay patella. The mean age at surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 93). The mean body mass index was 33.0 (range, 16.4 to 76.3), with 61.9% women. At the time of analysis, the mean time from surgery was 20.4 years (range, 15 to 26). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate survivorship at 15 years. We analyzed clinical outcomes using 3 patient-reported outcome measures collected prospectively.

RESULTS

The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for all causes as the end point was 97.1% (95% confidence interval 96.1 to 98.1%). The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for a patella-related complication as the end point was 99.7% (95% confidence interval 99.4 to 1.0). At the final follow-up, patients showed significant improvement in scores for the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (P < .001), and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey physical component (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine patellar resurfacing using a biconvex inlay patellar component has excellent survivorship and a low rate of complications at 15 years post-TKA.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing Following Primary Unresurfaced Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beware of the Incidence of Late Patellar Erosion

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) indications and rates in a single-surgeon series utilizing a modern TKA design and additionally, to review the functional outcomes of patients after undergoing SPR.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected institutional database was performed. All patients undergoing primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2021 were included. During this time, the senior surgeon resurfaced the patella selectively. Patients were divided into the primary resurfaced (PR) and the primary unresurfaced (UR). All patients undergoing SPR in the UR group were identified, their radiographs reviewed, and their clinical outcomes assessed. During the study period, 1,511 TKAs were performed, with 73.1% (1,105 TKAs) being unresurfaced.

RESULTS

The all-cause revision rate was 1.2% in the PR group and 3.6% in the UR group. The rate of SPR in the UR group was 2.0% (22 of 1,105 TKAs). No patient in the PR group underwent revision surgery for a patellar complication. The mean age at primary TKA for those undergoing SPR was 65 years (range, 50 to 78). The average time for SPR from primary TKA was 3.4 years (range, 1.1 to 8.8). Postoperative radiographic progression of patellar erosion, in combination with new onset anterior knee pain, was the indication for SPR in 14 of the 22 (63.7%) SPR cases. After SPR, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index score (P < .001) and Knee Society Score (P < .001) improved from pre-SPR.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) was the most common (55%) reason for revision surgery after primary UR TKA in this series. An SPR improved clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients. Surgeons should consider patellar resurfacing for all patients undergoing primary TKA to reduce the burden of revision surgery post-TKA. Additionally, the paradigm that late SPR does not improve clinical outcomes needs to be revisited.

Do we need to restore patellar thickness after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether increased patellar thickness after resurfacing decreased knee flexion angle and had any effect on functional outcomes comparing with patellar thickness restoration (patelloplasty) in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or not.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 220 patients undergoing primary TKA: 110 patients undergoing patelloplasty and 110 patients received overstuffed patellar resurfacing using subchondral bone cut at lateral facet technique were recruited. The mean increase in patellar thickness after resurfacing equal to 2 ± 1.2 mm. The outcomes were postoperative knee flexion angle and modified Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at minimum 2 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative knee flexion angles were similar between overstuffed resurfacing group and patelloplasty group (132 ± 7° vs. 134 ± 8°, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 6.9-1.8°, p = 0.1). The mean increase in postoperative knee flexion was 13° in both groups (p = 0.94). The mean change of overall modified WOMAC score was also similar between the two groups (42 ± 12 vs. 39 ± 9 points, 95% CI - 1.7-9.4 points, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that increased patellar thickness has no effect on postoperative knee flexion angle and functional outcomes in TKA. The finding clarified the misunderstanding principle of native patellar thickness restoration after resurfacing which had made many surgeons to refrain from resurfacing especially in patient who had thin patella.

How to Distinguish Correlation From Causation in Orthopaedic Research

Correlations in observational studies are commonly misinterpreted as causation. Although correlation is necessary to establish a causal relationship between two variables, correlations may also arise due to chance, reverse causality, or confounding. There are several methods available to orthopaedic researchers to determine whether the observed correlations are causal. These methods depend on the key components of the study including, but not limited to, study design and data availability on confounders. In this article, we illustrate the main concepts surrounding correlation and causation using intuitive real-world examples from the orthopaedic literature. Please visit the following https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW7pFudZbHA&t=52s for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

Aspirin for Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis Following Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Safety and Efficacy Accounting for Surgeon Selection Bias

BACKGROUND

Aspirin may be effective at preventing venous thromboembolism following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Current evidence is limited by bias as many surgeons who use aspirin prescribe for high-risk patients alternative chemoprophylactic agents. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients who received aspirin and warfarin while accounting for surgeon selection bias.

METHODS

A national database was queried for patients undergoing primary elective TKA or THA from 2015 to 2020. Patients whose surgeon used aspirin in >90% of their patients were compared to patients whose surgeon used warfarin in >90% of cases. Instrumental variable analyses were performed to assess for PE, DVT, and transfusion while accounting for selection bias. Among TKA patients, 26,657 (18.8%) were in the warfarin cohort and 115,005 (81.2%) were in the aspirin cohort. Among THA patients, 13,035 (17.7%) were in the warfarin cohort and 60,726 (82.3%) were in the aspirin cohort.

RESULTS

Analyses were unable to identify a difference in the risk of PE (TKA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98, P = .659; THA: aOR = 0.93, P = .310) and DVT (TKA: aOR = 1.05, P = .188; THA: aOR = 0.96, P = .493) between the aspirin and warfarin cohorts. However, the aspirin cohort was associated with a lower risk of transfusion (TKA: aOR = 0.58, P < .001, THA: 0.84, P < .001).

DISCUSSION

After accounting for surgeon selection bias, aspirin was as effective as warfarin at preventing PE and DVT following TKA and THA. Furthermore, aspirin was associated with a lower risk of transfusion compared to warfarin.

Tranexamic Acid and Prothrombotic Complications Following Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Population-Wide Safety Analysis Accounting for Surgeon Selection Bias

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) utilization during total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has become ubiquitous. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of thrombotic complications. The goal of this study was to examine the risk of prothrombotic complications in patients who received TXA during total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for patients who underwent elective TJA. TXA utilization trends were described from 2008 to 2020. Two analyses were performed using ICD-10 codes from 2016 to 2020: (1) patients who received TXA compared to patients who did not receive TXA and, (2) to account for surgeon selection bias, patients whose surgeon utilized TXA consistently (≥90% of cases) compared to patients whose surgeons used TXA infrequently (≤30% of cases). Multivariate and instrumental variable analyses (IVA) were performed to assess outcomes while accounting for confounding factors. TXA utilization increased from 0.1% of cases in 2008 to 89.2% in 2020. From 2016 to 2020, 1,120,858 TJAs were identified (62.1% TKA, 27.9% THA), of which 874,627 (78.0%) received TXA.

RESULTS

Patients who received TXA were at lower risk of prothrombotic (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.82, P < .001), bleeding (aOR 0.75, P < .001), and infectious complications (aOR 0.91, P < 0.001). Furthermore, patients who underwent surgery from surgeons who utilized TXA consistently were at lower risk for prothrombotic (aOR 0.90, P < .001) and bleeding (aOR 0.72, P < .001) complications.

CONCLUSION

The widespread utilization of TXA during elective TJA was not associated with increased rates of prothrombotic complications. These findings persisted after accounting for surgeon selection bias.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparison Among Conventional Multivariable Analysis, Proxy Exposure Analysis, and Instrumental Variable Analysis: Effectiveness of Two-or-More-Dose Vaccination for Measles and Rubella in University Students

A catch-up campaign for measles and rubella (MR) vaccinations was conducted among third-year high school (MR-4) students between 2008 and 2012 as part of governmental policy. We examined three analytical methodologies to assess the vaccination policies. We measured the antibody titers of the first-year students involved and not involved in the catch-up campaign and analyzed the levels of antibody titers after two-or-more-dose vaccination using conventional regression analysis, the individual's birth year using proxy exposure analysis, and the birth fiscal year using two-stage least square (2SLS) regression as instrumental variables. Of the 379 students invited to participate in the study, 220 (58.0%) vaccinated against measles and 213 (56.2%) vaccinated against rubella were included in the analysis. Conventional regression analysis revealed that two-or-more-dose vaccination produced 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.49) greater log-antibody titers for measles. Proxy exposure analysis of the birth year revealed that two-or-more-dose vaccination produced 0.40 (95% CI, 0.18-0.63) greater log-scale antibody titers against measles. According to the two-stage least squares regression analysis, two-or-more-dose vaccination produced 0.72 (95% CI, 0.31-1.13) greater log-scale antibody titers against measles. All three analyses showed similar trends, but no findings were reported for rubella. These results were consistent across the three analytical methodologies used to assess the vaccination policies.

Short-Term Surface Damage Mechanisms of Retrieved Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Patellar Components

BACKGROUND

Previous retrieval studies of patellar components for total knee arthroplasty focused on historical designs and polyethylene materials that are no longer clinically relevant. Therefore, this study aimed to compare revision reasons and surface damage mechanisms of conventional, gamma inert sterilized polyethylene and highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) patellar components in contemporary designs from a single manufacturer.

METHODS

A total of 114 gamma inert and 76 HXLPE patellar components were gathered in a multicenter orthopaedic implant retrieval program. Patient age and body mass index were similar between cohorts (P = .27 and P = .42, respectively); however, the gamma inert cohort was implanted longer (μ_difference = 3.1 years; P = .005). A matched subset was created based on the total knee arthroplasty design, patellar shape, and implantation time. Revision reasons were gathered from revision operating notes, and surface damage was examined via the Hood scoring method. Differences between HXLPE and gamma inert cohorts were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U-tests.

RESULTS

The most common revision reasons were infection, loosening, and instability, with the most common patellar complication resulting in revision being patellar loosening for both cohorts with similar incidences for both (chi-square; P = .60, P = .59). The most common surface damage modes were burnishing, scratching, and pitting in both cohorts. Total surface damage was significantly higher in the gamma inert components (P = .02), but not in the matched subset (P = .46).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the clinical performance of HXLPE was similar to that of conventional polyethylene for patellar components with short implantation times. While this study provides much needed information on the performance of HXLPE patellae in short-term retrievals, long-term studies are still needed.

Clinical effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing and selective resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational evidence

Background

Patellar resurfacing is optional during total knee replacement (TKR). Some surgeons always resurface the patella, some never resurface, and others selectively resurface. Which resurfacing strategy provides optimal outcomes is unclear. We assessed the effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing, and selective resurfacing in primary TKR.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and bibliographies were searched to November 2021 for randomised-control trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes for two or more resurfacing strategies (resurfacing, no resurfacing, or selective resurfacing) in primary TKR. Observational studies were included if limited or no RCTs existed for resurfacing comparisons. Outcomes assessed were patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and further surgery. Study-specific relative risks [RR] were aggregated using random-effects models. Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results

We identified 33 RCTs involving 5,540 TKRs (2,727 = resurfacing, 2,772 = no resurfacing, 41 = selective resurfacing). One trial reported on selective resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing reduced anterior knee pain compared with no resurfacing (RR = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.44–0.96)); there were no significant differences in PROMs. Resurfacing reduced the risk of revision surgery (RR = 0.63, CI = 0.42–0.94) and other complications (RR = 0.54, CI = 0.39–0.74) compared with no resurfacing. Quality of evidence ranged from high to very low. Limited observational evidence (5 studies, TKRs = 215,419) suggested selective resurfacing increased the revision risk (RR = 1.14, CI = 1.05–1.22) compared with resurfacing. Compared with no resurfacing, selective resurfacing had a higher risk of pain (RR = 1.25, CI = 1.04–1.50) and lower risk of revision (RR = 0.92, CI = 0.85–0.99).

Conclusions

Level 1 evidence supports TKR with patellar resurfacing over no resurfacing. Resurfacing has a reduced risk of anterior knee pain, revision surgery, and complications, despite PROMs being comparable. High-quality RCTs involving selective resurfacing, the most common strategy in the UK and other countries, are needed given the limited observational data suggests selective resurfacing may not be effective over other strategies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05877-7.

Accuracies of bone resection, implant position, and limb alignment in robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-centre study

Objective

This study assessed the accuracy of robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) for bone resection, component size prediction, implant placement, and limb alignment.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 36 patients. All procedures were performed by a single experienced surgeon, using an identical approach and implant designs. The MAKO RIO Robotic Interactive Orthopaedic Arm (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) system was used. The actual bone resection, implant placement, component size, and postoperative mechanical alignment were recorded, then compared with the preoperative plan.

Results

The mean absolute differences from the plan for the distal (medial and lateral) and posterior (medial and lateral) femoral cuts were 0.39 mm (0.62), 0.49 mm (0.70), 0.62 mm (0.79), and 0.65 mm (0.81), respectively, with 0.57° (0.65) varus. The mean absolute differences in the medial and lateral tibial cuts were 0.56 mm (0.75) and 0.58 mm (0.76), with 0.48° (0.16) varus and 0.54° (0.25) anterior/posterior slope. Of 192 bone resections, 176 (91.7%) were within ≤ 1 mm of the preoperative plan. The accuracies of femoral and tibial component size prediction were 100% and 97.22%, respectively. The mean absolute difference in final limb coronal alignment was 0.92° (0.65). Of the alignments, 18 (75.0%) were within ≤ 1.00° of the plan, and 100% were within ≤ 3.00° of the plan.

Conclusion

RATKA could accurately predict the component size and execute a preoperative plan to achieve precise bone resection, and implant placement, thereby reducing alignment outliers.

Patellar management during total knee arthroplasty: a review

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and surgeons tend to approach the patella with one of three general mindsets: always resurface the patella, never resurface the patella, or selectively resurface the patella based on specific patient or patellar criteria.

Studies comparing resurfacing and non-resurfacing of the patella during TKA have reported inconsistent and contradictory findings.

When resurfacing the patella is chosen, there are a number of available patellar component designs, materials, and techniques for cutting and fixation.

When patellar non-resurfacing is chosen, several alternatives are available, including patellar denervation, lateral retinacular release, and patelloplasty. Surgeons may choose to perform any of these alone, or together in some combination.

Prospective randomized studies are needed to better understand which patellar management techniques contribute to superior postoperative outcomes. Until then, this remains a controversial topic, and options for patellar management will need to be weighed on an individual basis per patient.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:861-871. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200156

Management of the Patella During Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial topic with no consensus.

»

Patellar management techniques during TKA include patellar retention or resurfacing with or without patellaplasty, as well as circumferential denervation and partial lateral facetectomy (PLF).

»

Special considerations such as patient age, etiology of disease, implant design, and surgeon preference should be accounted for when determining optimal management.

»

We recommend that most patellae be circumferentially denervated, regardless of whether they are resurfaced, as the potential benefits outweigh the small associated risks.

»

Evidence demonstrates improved functional outcomes with the addition of PLF to nonresurfaced patellae. There is currently a paucity of evidence of this technique with respect to resurfaced patellae.

»

Patellar resurfacing adds additional costs and health-care resources that should be considered in the decision-making process.

Patellar resurfacing during primary total knee replacement is associated with a lower risk of revision surgery

AIMS

Debate remains whether the patella should be resurfaced during total knee replacement (TKR). For non-resurfaced TKRs, we estimated what the revision rate would have been if the patella had been resurfaced, and examined the risk of re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry (NJR) was performed. All primary TKRs for osteoarthritis alone performed between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016 were eligible (n = 842,072). Patellar resurfacing during TKR was performed in 36% (n = 305,844). The primary outcome was all-cause revision surgery. Secondary outcomes were the number of excess all-cause revisions associated with using TKRs without (versus with) patellar resurfacing, and the risk of re-revision after secondary patellar resurfacing.

RESULTS

The cumulative risk of all-cause revision at ten years was higher (p < 0.001) in primary TKRs without patellar resurfacing (3.54% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47 to 3.62)) compared to those with resurfacing (3.00% (95% CI 2.91 to 3.11)). Using flexible parametric survival modelling, we estimated one 'excess' revision per 189 cases performed where the patella was not resurfaced by ten years (equivalent to 2,842 excess revisions in our cohort). The risk of all-cause re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing was 4.6 times higher than the risk of revision after primary TKR with patellar resurfacing (at five years from secondary patellar resurfacing, 8.8% vs 1.9%).

CONCLUSION

Performing TKR without patellar resurfacing was associated with an increased risk of revision. Secondary patellar resurfacing led to a high risk of re-revision. This represents a potential substantial healthcare burden that should be considered when forming treatment guidelines and commissioning services. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):864-871.

Patellar Denervation Reduces Postoperative Anterior Knee Pain After Patellar Resurfacing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The benefit of patellar denervation (PD) in patellar resurfacing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debatable. This prospective, randomized controlled trial investigated whether circumferential PD should be performed in patellar resurfacing TKA.

METHODS

A total of 241 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were randomized into PD or non-PD groups. Incidence, intensity, and presentation time of anterior knee pain (AKP) and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the PD group (6.4% vs 16.2%, P = .032). The intensity of AKP and patient satisfaction scores were significantly better in the PD group at 3 months but not after 3 months. The presentation time of AKP mostly occurs at 3 months after surgery. The Knee Society score, range of motion, Oxford score, patellar score, activity of daily living score, and visual analog scale of overall knee pain were not significantly different between the two groups during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Given that PD can improve AKP and patient satisfaction at an early period postoperatively without jeopardizing clinical outcomes at no additional cost, this inexpensive procedure readily available in nearly every operation room is strongly recommended during primary TKA with patellar resurfacing.

Global Research Trends in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study

BACKGROUND

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a longstanding area of research interest in orthopedics due to its increasing global demand and associated technical challenges. The present study aims to analyze and present the current state of research and trends in this active field.

METHODS

Articles on revision TKA published from inception to 2018 were retrieved from Web of Science. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using the metadata of the included articles. Visualized analysis was conducted using VOSviewer software to reveal global trends in revision TKA research, through analyses of bibliographic coupling, co-authorship, co-citation and co-occurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 6027 articles were included. The number of publications and relative research interest in the field of revision TKA displayed strong upward growth over the time period examined. The USA had the highest number of citations for publications in this field, as well as the highest H-index. Studies in the field could be categorized into five clusters: prosthesis design, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic joint infection, risk factors for revision TKA, and survivorship of implants. Studies focused on infection and risk factors for revision TKA are likely to become the most popular research topics in the field.

CONCLUSION

Global trends over the past few years suggest that the field of revision TKA research will continue to grow and lead to increasing rates of publication output over the coming years. Future developments in the field will likely include more preventative and etiological studies relating to revision TKA.

Association Between Uncemented vs Cemented Hemiarthroplasty and Revision Surgery Among Patients With Hip Fracture

IMPORTANCE

Consensus guidelines and systematic reviews have suggested that cemented fixation is more effective than uncemented fixation in hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Given that these recommendations are based on research performed outside the United States, it is uncertain whether these findings also reflect the US experience.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes associated with cemented vs uncemented hemiarthroplasty in a large US integrated health care system.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study of 12 491 patients aged 60 years and older who underwent hemiarthroplasty treatment of a hip fracture between 2009 and 2017 at 1 of the 36 hospitals owned by Kaiser Permanente, a large US health maintenance organization. Patients were followed up until membership termination, death, or the study end date of December 31, 2017.

EXPOSURES

Hemiarthroplasty (prosthetic replacement of the femoral head) fixation via bony growth into a porous-coated implant (uncemented) or with cement.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was aseptic revision, defined as any reoperation performed after the index procedure involving exchange of the existing implant for reasons other than infection. Secondary outcomes were mortality (in-hospital, postdischarge, and overall), 90-day medical complications, 90-day emergency department visits, and 90-day unplanned readmissions.

RESULTS

Among 12 491 patients in the study cohort who underwent hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture (median age, 83 years; 8660 women [69.3%]), 6042 (48.4%) had undergone uncemented fixation and 6449 (51.6%) had undergone cemented fixation, and the median length of follow-up was 3.8 years. In the multivariable regression analysis controlling for confounders, uncemented fixation was associated with a significantly higher risk of aseptic revision (cumulative incidence at 1 year after operation, 3.0% vs 1.3%; absolute difference, 1.7% [95% CI, 1.1%-2.2%]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.77 [95% CI, 1.43-2.19]; P < .001). Of the 6 prespecified secondary end points, none showed a statistically significant difference between groups, including in-hospital mortality (1.7% for uncemented fixation vs 2.0% for cemented fixation; HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.73-1.21]; P = .61) and overall mortality (cumulative incidence at 1 year after operation: 20.0% for uncemented fixation vs 22.8% for cemented fixation; HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.90-1.01]; P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with hip fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty in a large US integrated health care system, uncemented fixation, compared with cemented fixation, was associated with a statistically significantly higher risk of aseptic revision. These findings suggest that US surgeons should consider cemented fixation in the hemiarthroplasty treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the absence of contraindications.