Outcomes of 360° Osteotomy in the Cervicothoracic Spine (C7-T1) for Congenital Cervicothoracic Kyphoscoliosis in Children

A novel classification of congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis: identification of coronal subtypes and their prognostic significance

OBJECTIVE

To propose a novel classification system for stratifying coronal curve patterns in congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis with hemivertebrae (CTS-HV).

METHODS

Type A: regional cervicothoracic deformity only disturbing the balance of head-neck-shoulder complex; Type B: cervicothoracic deformity with significant trunk tilt to the convex side; Type C: cervicothoracic deformity with a significant compensatory thoracic curve. The reliability and reproducibility were assessed via the Kappa test. The differences among different subtypes in deformity parameters and bony structures were compared to identify the causative factors predisposing to different subtypes.

RESULTS

98 patients were classified into Type A (47 cases), Type B (31 cases), and Type C (20 cases). The Kappa test showed excellent reliability (Kappa value = 0.847) and reproducibility (Kappa value = 0.881). The proportions of Klippel-Feil syndrome in Types B (71.0%) and C (85.0%) were significantly higher than in Type A (46.8%; all P < 0.05). Type A (66.0%) and Type B (71.0%) predominantly had their hemivertebra (HV) at T3 or T4, while Type C (75%) mostly had HV at T1 or T2. Type B exhibited the most severe trunk tilt, head shift, neck tilt, head tilt, and coronal balance distance (all P < 0.05). Type C had the lowest T1 tilt and first rib angle despite the greatest cervicothoracic Cobb angle (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel reliable classification allows a better understanding of structural diversity and different coronal compensatory mechanisms for the natural progression of CTS-HV. It can contribute to determining the individualized treatment strategy and standardizing academic communication for this rare clinical entity.

Progressive coronal caudal curve after corrective osteotomies for congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis: incidence and predictors

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative progressive coronal caudal curve (PCC) was characterized by a postoperative de novo caudal S-curve ≥ 20° following congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis (CTS) corrective osteotomies, and at least 20° greater than the preoperative measurement, while the incidence was uncertain and the pathogenesis was equivocal. The objective of this study was to investigate the morbidity and potential factors contributing to PCC following CTS surgery.

METHODS

This study reviewed 72 CTS patients between 2005 and 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the absence or presence of PCC at last follow-up, namely the nonprogressive curve group (NPC-group) and the progressive curve group (PC-group). Demographics, radiographic data and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire results were reviewed. Multivariate linear regression analyses were utilized to determine possible predictors for PCC.

RESULTS

PCC was observed in 11 (15%) of the total 72 patients. Compared with the NPC-group, the PC-group exhibited greater postoperative residual local curve (24.0 ± 9.7° vs. 9.1 ± 4.4°, P < 0.001), upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt (16.9 ± 7.4° vs. 6.2 ± 3.7°, P < 0.001), T1 tilt (14.3 ± 9.4° vs. 6.6 ± 3.9°, P = 0.022) and neck tilt (10.1 ± 6.7° vs. 3.7 ± 2.5, P = 0.009). The multivariable linear regression demonstrated that the larger postoperative UIV tilt, residual local curve and neck tilt were associated with PCC. In addition, patients with PCC showed lower SRS-22 scores in terms of pain, mental health, self-image and satisfaction (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The morbidity of PCC was 15% in CTS patients who underwent corrective osteotomies. Greater residual local curve, postoperative UIV tilt and neck tilt were identified as predictors for PCC.

Cervicothoracic dislocation due to congenital and bone-dysplasia-related vertebral malformations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the approaches to treatment of congenital and bone-dysplasia-related pediatric cervicothoracic dislocations and define the optimal treatment method.

METHODS

The publications available in PubMed and Google Scholar data bases were selected following such criteria as the disease in question, pediatric age, the treatment description, and follow-up results. The paper also includes the descriptions of our own six cases of the cervicothoracic dislocations detected in children with different vertebral malformations.

RESULTS

Only eight patients meeting the abovementioned selection criteria were found in the publications: three of them had the Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS), two had one-level vertebral anomaly, one had neurofibromatosis (NF type 1), one had the Larsen syndrome, and one had a variation of VACTERL association. Their treatment was long term, multi stage, and complicated. Among six our own cases, four patients also had KFS, one had a variation of VACTERL association, and one had NF type 1. All the patients suffered from preoperative neurological disorders. Posterior instrumental fixation with posterior vertebral body resection was performed in four cases and one patient underwent a combined surgery. The parents of one of the patients refused the operation, so he was observed while receiving bracing treatment. Since the treatment was long term and complicated by reoperations, the average follow-up period comprised 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Congenital cervicothoracic dislocations are an extremely rare pathology that manifests itself in early age and requires an early surgical treatment. Failure to provide the treatment leads to the patient's disability. The surgical tactics for such patients is determined individually, but the published data and our own experience demonstrate that early multi-stage combined treatment has been the best option available so far. The cervicothoracic dislocations due to NF 1 manifest later and have a more favorable forecast.

Multiple Hemivertebrae: The Natural History and Treatment of 50 Patients

OBJECTIVE

Multiple hemivertebrae (MHV) is defined as three or more hemivertebrae, and is relatively uncommon among patients with congenital scoliosis. This study aimed to compare the natural history of different kinds of MHV and describe the surgical outcome of MHV.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 50 patients diagnosed with MHV were enrolled from June 2007 to June 2018. The medical records and radiographs of these patients were reviewed to summarize the characteristics of MHV. Patients with MHV were divided into the unbalanced (UB) group, partially unbalanced (PUB) group, and completely balanced (CB) group. Medical records and radiographs of MHV patients were reviewed to collect HV position, natural history, coronal and sagittal parameters. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the radiographical data, such as the cobb angle of main curve and secondary curve, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare the patients in different kinds of MHV with surgical indication or not.

RESULTS

The average number of hemivertebrae was 3.6 and the average main curve was 57.5°. Twenty-four of 50 patients had associated anomalies, including four patients with sacral agenesis, one with tetralogy of Fallot, two with congenital imperforate anus, and 17 with Klippel-Feil syndrome. In 22 patients who underwent MRI imaging, three patients had mild syringomyelia and three patients had diastematomyelia. The UB and PUB groups had a larger main curve and compensatory curve than the CB group. Of the 25 patients with follow-up before surgery, the curve progression rate was highest in the UB group (12.1°/year) but similar in the PUB group (4.2°/year) and CB group (3.6°/year). All patients in the UB and PUB group met the criteria for surgery. In contrast, only 10 of 23 patients in the CB group had surgical indications. Eighteen of the 37 patients with surgical indications chose to undergo surgery and the correction rate of the main curve was 51.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Early surgical intervention should be considered for most patients with UB or PUB MHV. For patients with CB MHV, surgical treatment may not be urgently needed at the first visit. Posterior hemivertebrectomy could be used for the treatment of MHV with satisfying radiographic outcome.

Strategy and Efficacy of Surgery for Congenital Cervicothoracic Scoliosis with or without Hemivertebra Osteotomy

OBJECTIVE

Cervicothoracic scoliosis will cause severe deformities in the early stage, and its structure is complex and the surgical methods are varied. The purpose of this research is to explore the indication and analyze the corrective effect of the two different posterior approach surgical strategies, including correction with fusion and hemivertebra osteotomy, for congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis deformities in children and adolescents.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 21 patients with cervicothoracic scoliosis who received surgical treatment from January 2010 to June 2020, including nine cases of posterior hemivertebra osteotomy and fusion surgery and 12 cases of posterior correction and fusion alone. The Cobb angle, T1 tilt angle, clavicular angle, neck tilt angle, radiographic shoulder height, sagittal vertical axis, coronal balance distance, and local kyphosis angle were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. Posterior approach hemivertebra resection or correction with fusion surgery was adopted based on the different individual characteristics of deformity such as main curve Cobb angle, growth potential, and flexibility. Patients were divided into two groups (osteotomy group and nonosteotomy group) according to whether a hemivertebra osteotomy was performed, and the corrective results in the two groups were compared. Paired-sample t tests or independent-sample t tests were used.

RESULTS

The median follow-up after surgery of the 21 patients was 36 months (range, 18-72 months). The Cobb angle was corrected from 45.81° ± 14.23° preoperatively to 10.48° ± 5.56° postoperatively (correction rate, 77.78% ± 8.93%). The T1 tilt angle decreased from 15.26° ± 7.08° preoperatively to 3.33° ± 2.14° postoperatively (correction rate,73.42% ± 21.86%). The radiographic shoulder height was corrected from 1.13 ± 0.74 cm preoperatively to 0.52 ± 0.42 cm postoperatively (correction rate, 39.51% ± 35.65%). The clavicular angle improved from 2.52° ± 1.55° preoperatively to 1.16° ± 0.96° postoperatively (correction rate, 47.18% ± 35.84%). No significant differences were found at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). The Cobb angle of the main curve, T1 tilt angle, clavicular angle, cervical tilt angle, and shoulder height difference were similar in the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior approach hemivertebra resection or correction with fusion surgery can be used in the treatment of congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis with satisfactory results, and the surgeon can make an individualized surgical plan according to individual characteristics of deformity.

Is Growth-friendly Surgical Treatment Superior to One-stage Posterior Spinal Fusion in 9- to 11-year-old Children with Congenital Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND

The distraction-based growth-friendly technique has become a mainstay of treatment for young children with long-spanned congenital scoliosis. However, in patients who are 9 years to 11 years old, the choice is much less clear, and posterior spinal fusion is also a potential option.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Comparing growth-friendly scoliosis surgery and posterior spinal fusion, which technique (1) provides greater correction of spinal deformity, (2) is associated with more surgical complications, and (3) results in greater improvement in pulmonary function tests, health-related quality of life scores, other patient-reported outcomes?

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2017, one spinal center performed 212 spinal interventions for scoliosis in patients aged between 9 years and 11 years old and who had open triradiate cartilage, including 40 patients with growth-friendly approaches (34 with growing-rod technique and six with a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib) and 172 with one-stage posterior spinal fusion, respectively. During this period, our general indications for using growth-friendly surgery were patients with open triradiate cartilage, major curve higher than 40°, and upper and lower end vertebrae involving at least eight segments. Twelve patients with a median (range) age of 9.3 years (9 to 11) treated with growth-friendly surgery met the following inclusion criteria: (1) had at least two lengthening procedures before definitive spinal fusion along with 2 years of follow-up after definitive spinal fusion; (2) had been followed until skeletal maturity (Risser grade ≥ 4); and (3) with complete radiographic and clinical data (health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and pulmonary function test results) preoperatively and at the latest follow-up. A group of patients between 9 years and 11 years old and underwent one-stage posterior spinal fusion was selected from our database of patients with congenital scoliosis. Our general indications for using one-stage posterior spinal fusion were patients with a major curve greater than 40°, and with thoracic height higher than 18 cm. Sixty-two patients who had open triradiate cartilage and had been followed until skeletal maturity (Risser grade ≥ 4) were accounted for. In this retrospective, controlled study, we matched patients in the posterior spinal fusion group to those 12 patients who had growth-friendly surgery by age, sex, pathologic findings, major curve size, and location of the apex of the major curve (2:1 matching provided 24 patients in the control group). The median (range) age was 9.8 years (9 to 11). We then compared the groups in terms of magnitude of correction and postoperative complications. Surgical complications, including infection, implant-related complications, and alignment-related complications were evaluated and classified using the surgical complications grading system. Pulmonary function tests and HRQoL were also compared between groups. Pulmonary function tests were performed at the same center with a spirometer. HRQoL were assessed by questionnaire, including the 24-item Early-onset Scoliosis questionnaire for parent-reported outcomes and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire for patient-reported outcomes. All patients involved in this study gave their informed consent.

RESULTS

The posterior spinal fusion group achieved a greater correction magnitude at the latest follow-up (median [range] 46% [28 to 70] versus median 34% [9 to 58], difference of medians = 11%; p < 0.001) than the growth-friendly group. A higher proportion of patients in the growth-friendly group had complications than in the posterior spinal fusion group (7 of 12 versus 4 of 24; p = 0.03). There were no between-group differences in terms of pulmonary function tests. Few differences were found between the groups in terms of 24-item Early-onset Scoliosis parental impact (median [range] 60 [44 to 83] for the growth-friendly group versus median 71 [55 to 87] for the posterior spinal fusion group, difference of medians = 13; p = 0.001), financial burden (median 44 [30 to 55] for the growth-friendly group versus median 62 [53 to 75] for the posterior spinal fusion group, difference of medians = 16; p < 0.001) and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 self-image scores (median 3.8 [3.2 to 4.3] for the growth-friendly group versus median 4.4 [4.1 to 4.6] for the posterior spinal fusion group, difference of medians = 0.5; p = 0.006) at the latest follow-up, and those differences that were observed all favored the posterior spinal fusion group.

CONCLUSIONS

In light of the superior deformity correction and fewer observed complications with posterior spinal fusion, and the absence of important differences in validated outcomes scores or pulmonary function tests, posterior spinal fusion might be a better choice for 9- to 11-year-old children with long-spanned congenital scoliosis and limited growth potential in the intended instrumentation area.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.