"Doctor, What Happens After My Meniscectomy?"

Comparison of Size of Posterior Tibial Slope and Medial Tibial Depth in Patients With an Isolated Meniscal Tear Requiring Surgery and Matched Uninjured Controls

BACKGROUND

Meniscal injuries are extremely common. Several anatomic features of the knee, including the tibial plateau morphology, have been shown to influence knee biomechanics and the risk of ligamentous injuries. Little is known, however, how these morphological features influence the risk of isolated meniscal injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-intact knee.

HYPOTHESIS

There are differences in the slopes and concavity of the tibial plateau between patients with isolated meniscal tears and matched uninjured controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In total, 89 patients with first-instance isolated medial (n = 37) or lateral (n = 52) meniscal injuries requiring surgical treatment (mean age, 16 ± 1 years; 35% female) were matched to 89 controls with uninjured knees and no previous injuries (mean age, 16 ± 2 years; 35% female) based on age and sex. Magnetic resonance imaging scans (preoperative for injured group) were used to measure the coronal slope of the tibial plateau, posterior slope of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus, and maximum depth of the medial tibial plateau. General linear models were used to evaluate the differences in tibial plateau morphology between the knees with and without meniscal injuries, with and without adjustment for age and sex.

RESULTS

Compared with matched controls, patients with surgically treated isolated meniscal tears had a smaller lateral tibial slope (by 2.2° [medial meniscal injury] and 1.6° [lateral meniscal injury]; P < .02), a smaller medial tibial slope (by 2.3° [medial meniscal injury] and 2.4° [lateral meniscal injury]; P < .001) and a larger medial tibial depth (by 0.8 mm [medial meniscal injury] and 0.9 mm [lateral meniscal injury]; P < .001). There were no differences in coronal tibial slope between the injured and uninjured groups. There were no differences in quantified anatomic features between the isolated medial and lateral meniscal injury groups. The same trends were observed after adjusting for age and sex.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that patients with an isolated meniscal tear requiring surgery have a smaller posterior tibial slope and a larger medial tibial depth (more concave medial tibial plateau) than matched uninjured controls. This is contrary to what is known for ACL tears, in which a steeper posterior tibial slope and a shallower medial tibial depth have been associated with an increased risk of ACL tear.

The Principles of Knee Joint Preservation: Operative Treatment Strategies

➤ Joint alignment, meniscal status, and ligament stability are codependent factors involved in knee joint preservation, and any injury or imbalance can impact the knee articular cartilage status and can result in adverse clinical outcomes.➤ Cartilage preservation procedures in the knee will not result in optimal outcomes if there is joint malalignment, meniscal deficiency, or ligamentous instability.➤ Lower-extremity varus or valgus malalignment is a risk factor for the failure of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It represents an indication for a high tibial osteotomy or distal femoral osteotomy in the setting of failed ACL reconstruction, and may even be considered in patients who have an initial ACL injury and severe malalignment.➤ An elevated posterior tibial slope increases the risk of failure of ACL reconstruction, whereas a decreased posterior tibial slope increases the risk of failure of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Age alone does not affect the joint survivorship after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative medial meniscus tears: a propensity-score matched survival analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of age itself on the joint survivorship after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for degenerative medial meniscus tears (DMTs).

METHODS

Patients undergoing APM for DMTs during 1999-2010 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) DMTs identified on preoperative MRI scans, (2) no definite history of trauma, and (3) follow-up duration more than 5 years. In evaluation of the joint survivorship, the endpoint was defined as conversion to arthroplasty (or realignment osteotomy) or progression to Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4. The study population was divided into older and younger groups by a cutoff age at which the difference in the joint survival rates was maximized, using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The two groups were then matched based on propensity scores. The joint survival rates were compared between the groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis, before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

A total of 633 knees were included. The cutoff age was calculated as 60 years. Before PSM, 239 knees were allocated to the older group (≥ 60 years) and 394 knees to the younger group (< 60 years). A significant difference in the joint survival rates was noted between the groups (log-rank test, p < 0.001). After PSM, 183 knees remained in each group. The difference in the survival rates was no more statistically significant (n.s.). The latest Lysholm scores of the older and the younger groups before PSM were 72.2 ± 20.8 and 79.9 ± 19.6, respectively (p < 0.001); however, the scores after PSM were 73.2 ± 20.3 and 77.4 ± 20.5, respectively (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Joint survivorship after APM was affected by other factors associated with the aging process, such as cartilage status and meniscal tear pattern, rather than age itself. Advanced age should not be the only reason for precluding APM in treatment of DMTs. APM is a viable option when treating DMTs in elderly patients if adopted with caution. According to this study, a surgeon should assess the age-related factors when he considers APM in elderly patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Off-Season Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football Players Has a Longer Return to Sport Time than In-Season Surgery

Purpose

To report the outcomes of routine arthroscopic meniscectomy in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Football players.

Methods

NCAA athletes who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy over 5 years were included. Players who had incomplete data, previous knee surgery, ligamentous injury, and/or microfractures were excluded. Data collected were player position, timing of surgery, procedures performed, return to play (RTP) rate and time, and postoperative performance. Continuous variables were analyzed with Student t-tests or a one-way analysis of variance.

Results

Thirty-six athletes (38 knees) who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (31 lateral, 7 medial) were included. The mean RTP time was 71 ± 39 days. The mean RTP time in athletes who underwent in-season surgery) was significantly shorter than the RTP in athletes who had off-season surgery (58 ± 41 days vs 85 ± 33 days, P < .05). The mean RTP in 29 athletes (31 knees) with lateral meniscectomy was similar to the 7 athletes (7 knees) who had medial meniscectomy (70 ± 36 vs 77 ± 56, P = .6803). The mean RTP time was similar between football players who underwent isolated lateral meniscectomy and those who had lateral meniscectomy with chondroplasty (61 ± 36 days vs 75±41 days, P = .32). Athletes played an average of 7.7 ± 4.9 games the season they returned; position category and anatomical compartment of the knee lesion had no bearing on number of games played (P = .1864 and P = .425).

Conclusions

NCAA Division 1 football players who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy RTP at approximately 2.5 months' postoperatively. Athletes who underwent off-season surgery had longer RTP time compared with those who underwent in-season surgery. RTP time and performance after surgery did not differ based on player position, anatomical location of the lesions, or chondroplasty at the time of meniscectomy.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Approximately One Half of Patients Greater Than 40 Years Old Achieve Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State 6 Months After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to 1) calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in a population of patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) based on Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores (KOOS), 2) quantify the difference between the proportion of patients reaching MCID based on KOOS versus the proportion who considered surgery to be successful based on a "yes" answer to a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) question, and 3) calculate the percentage of patients experiencing treatment failure (TF).

Methods

A large, single-institution clinical database was queried for patients undergoing isolated APM (>40 years of age). Data were collected at regular time intervals, including KOOS and PASS outcome measures. Calculation of MCID using a distribution-based model was performed using preoperative KOOS scores as baseline. Comparison of the proportion of patients surpassing MCID was made to the proportion of patients answering "yes" to a tiered PASS question at 6 months after APM. Proportion of patients experiencing TF was calculated using patients who responded "no" to a PASS question and "yes" to a TF question.

Results

Three-hundred and fourteen of 969 patients met inclusion criteria. At 6 months following APM, the percentage of patients meeting or exceeding the MCID for each respective KOOS subscore ranged from 64 to 72% compared to 48% who achieved a PASS (P < .0001 for each subscore). Fourteen percent of patients experienced TF.

Conclusions

Six months after APM, approximately one half of the patients achieved a PASS and 15% experienced TF. The difference between achieving MCID based on each of the KOOS subscores and achieving success via PASS ranged from 16% to 24%. Thirty-eight percent of patients undergoing APM did not fit neatly into overt success or failure categorization.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Impact of job characteristics on return-to-work interval following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy

The aim of this paper was to investigate whether job characteristics are associated with time interval for return to former professional activity (return to work, RTW) after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). A retrospective study was carried out in a sample of 63 patients in working age who underwent an APM between July 2018 and July 2020. The following preoperative characteristics were assessed: age at surgery, meniscal side, sex, physical job demands (white versus blue collar worker), telework and work status (salaried versus self- employed). A linear regression analysis was used to study the association between job characteristics and RTW interval adjusted for socio-demographic and medical (meniscal side) factors. Telework was most strongly associated with interval for RTW (p <0,001, adjusted R Square: 20,8). The results suggested that telework supports early RTW independently of sociodemographic and medical factors. This study supported the need for a tailormade approach in the prescription of sick leave.

The efficacy of intraarticular viscosupplementation after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

METHOD

A randomized controlled trial of 47 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was conducted between March 2020 and March 2021. Patients were randomized into two groups: a viscosupplementation group (n = 23) and a control group (n = 24). A single-dose intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection was used as viscosupplementation. The 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment was measured at baseline and at 1 day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, Lysholm, and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and range of motion (ROM) of the knee were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

RESULTS

The 100 mm VAS score for pain was significantly lower in the viscosupplementation group at 2 weeks post-surgery (27.5 mm vs. 40.7 mm, P = 0.047). ROM was significantly greater in the viscosupplementation group than in the control group at 2 weeks (131.5° vs. 121.0°, P = 0.044) post-surgery. No significant differences were observed in the IKDC or in the Tegner, Lysholm, and WOMAC scores between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Viscosupplementation after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy significantly reduced pain at 2 weeks post-surgery and improved ROM of the knee at 2 weeks post-surgery. There might be some benefits in terms of pain and functional recovery of viscosupplementation after arthroscopic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This randomized controlled trial was registered at cris.nih.go.kr # KCT0004921 .

An increasing trend of the number of meniscus allograft transplantation in Korea

PURPOSE

Meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) can be performed to treat symptomatic patients with meniscus-deficient knees. However, the current epidemiologic status of MAT is unknown in many countries, including Korea. This study aimed to investigate the national trends of MAT in Korea which covers MAT procedures by the Korean national health insurance system.

METHODS

Information from the national database was acquired through the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) from 2010 to 2017. All patients encoded as MAT were included. The total number of MATs and their incidence per 100,000 persons were determined, and the results were stratified by age and sex.

RESULTS

The total number of MATs and their incidence per 100,000 persons per year were 369 and 0.77, respectively, in 2010, which increased to 826 and 1.72, respectively, in 2017. The number of MATs increased by 124% over 8 years. The peaks for the total number of MATs and their incidence were seen in patients in their 20 s in 2010, but in 2017, the peaks were observed in patients who were in their 40 s. MAT was performed more frequently in males (61%) than in females (39%) over the study period.

CONCLUSION

The total number of MATs and their incidence had increased by 124% between 2010 and 2017. The peak treatment age range for MAT changed from 20 years of age in 2010 to 40 years of age in 2017, and MAT was performed more frequently in males than in females.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outcomes at 20 years after meniscectomy in young patients

AIM

To define arthroscopic meniscectomy (AM) outcomes in young patients at 20 years follow up in terms of predictors of poor clinical results, rate and timing of conversion to total knee replacement (TKR).

METHODS

The following data were collected for 225 patients aged between 18 and 50 years with meniscal tear (MT) who underwent AM: age at surgery, gender, injured meniscus, knee alignment, associated lesions, amount of meniscal resection. At 20 years follow up, rate and timing of TKR conversion and clinical outcomes with Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) score were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ten patients (4.4%) required TKR in the follow up period. The mean time from AM to TKR was 7.0 years (standard deviation 3.87). Age between 40 and 50 years at AM (P < 0.01), malalignment (P < 0.01), lateral meniscectomy (any size, P = 0.01), advanced chondral lesion (Outerbridge > 2, P < 0.01) and total meniscectomy (P < 0.01) were significantly related to subsequent TKR. Negative predicting factors to obtaining equal or superior to age/sex-adjusted KOOS score were age between 40 and 50 years old at time of AM (P < 0.01), female sex (P < 0.01), malalignment (P = 0.04), and advanced chondral lesion (Outerbridge > 2, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty years conversion rate to TKR after AM for MT is 4.4% and TKR was performed after a mean time of 7 years. Significant association between TKR surgery and advanced chondral lesion (Outerbridge > 2), total meniscectomy, lateral meniscectomy, age at surgery between 40 and 50 years old, and malalignment were found. Age between 40 and 50 years at time of AM, female, malalignment, advanced chondral lesion were all factors significantly related to poor clinical results.

Augmentation of Meniscal Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

Background:

The effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation for meniscal repair (MR) is unclear, as current evidence is limited to small, mostly nonrandomized studies.

Purpose:

To systematically review the literature to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MR with PRP augmentation.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies (level of evidence 1-3) that compared the clinical efficacy of MR performed with versus without PRP. The search phrase used was platelet-rich plasma meniscus. Patients were assessed based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Lysholm score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and treatment failure.

Results:

We identified 6 studies (2 studies with level 1 evidence; 4 studies with level 3 evidence) that met inclusion criteria, for a total of 309 patients undergoing MR with PRP (mean age, 31.9 years) and 445 patients without PRP augmentation (mean age, 29.6 years). The mean follow-up was 32.8 months (range, 12-72 months). Overall, 17.0% of PRP patients experienced MR failure compared with 22.1% of non-PRP patients. No differences in VAS, Lysholm, or subjective IKDC scores were found between groups except in 1 study, in which postoperative subjective IKDC scores were significantly better in the PRP group (P < .01). Another study found significantly better postoperative WOMAC scores among PRP patients, and 2 studies found significantly better KOOS subscores among PRP patients.

Conclusion:

There are a limited number of high-quality studies comparing outcomes and healing rates between patients undergoing MR with versus without PRP augmentation. Based on the available evidence, patients undergoing MR with PRP augmentation experience similar clinical outcomes at midterm follow-up when compared with conventional MR, and additional studies are needed to determine the efficacy of MR augmented with PRP.