Confronting the Opioid Crisis: Practical Pain Management and Strategies: AOA 2018 Critical Issues Symposium

Access to an Educational Video Preoperatively Has No Effect on Postoperative Opioid Use After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy of the Knee: A Prospective Cohort Study

Purpose

To determine whether access to a website with an educational video would decrease postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Methods

Enrolled patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy at a single center were randomized to either the intervention or control group prior to surgery. The intervention group received a card with access to an online educational video regarding opioids with their postoperative instructions; the control group did not. The online video was just over 5 minutes long and contained general information about the dangers of opioid use, how to safely dispose of unused opioids, and local support contact information. Data were collected by telephone 10 to 14 days postoperatively and analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 9.5.0. Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, allergies, smoking, depression, alcohol abuse, American Society of Anesthesiologists level, diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes, substance abuse, employment status, workers' compensation, and sports participation were analyzed and correlated with postoperative opioid use.

Results

A total of 166 patients were included in this study, with 78 in the control group and 88 in the intervention group. Mean number of pills consumed was 3 in the control group and 2.2 in the intervention group. This difference did not reach statistical significance. Patients who were obese, smokers, or diagnosed with depression both consumed more opioids and were less likely to take no narcotics postoperatively. Patients who participated in sports consumed fewer total opioids on average than those who did not. Subgroup analysis of patients with higher risk factors did not show a difference between the control and intervention groups in the average amount of opioid used or the likelihood of using no narcotics. Among all patients, 82 (49%) used no narcotics postoperatively and 90% used 8 or fewer tablets.

Conclusions

Directing patients to an educational website and video is not an effective tool in decreasing opioid consumption. Patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy who are obese, active smokers, and clinically depressed or do not participate in sports are likely to use more postoperative narcotics. Regardless of access to the online educational video, half of patients used no narcotics.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prospective cohort.

Surgical Demographics of Acute Hand Compartment Syndrome

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the demographic, injury-related, and treatment-related characteristics of patients who undergo fasciotomies for acute hand compartment syndrome.

METHODS

A cohort of 53 adult patients with acute hand compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomy at 2 tertiary care referral centers over a 10-year time period from January 1, 2006, to June 30, 2015, were retrospectively identified. We reviewed the electronic medical record for patient-related variables (eg, age, sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus), injury-related variables (eg, mechanism of injury, presence of fractures), and treatment-related variables (eg, compartments released, number of operations, use of split-thickness skin grafts, and time from injury to surgery).

RESULTS

The mean age of our cohort was 45 years, and 33 patients (62%) were men. The mechanism of injury varied widely, but the most common causative mechanisms were crush injury (25%), prolonged decubitus (17%), and infection (11%). Associated hand fractures were present in 15 (28%) patients. The surgically released compartments varied; the dorsal interosseous compartments (83%), thenar compartment (75%), and hypothenar compartment (74%) were most frequently released, while the adductor pollicis compartment (43%) and Guyon canal (28%) were least frequently released.

CONCLUSIONS

The demographics of acute hand compartment syndrome have evolved in the last 25 years compared with the prior literature, partly as a result of the opioid epidemic leading to a rise in "found down" compartment syndrome. Treating providers should recognize crush injury, prolonged decubitus, and infection as the most common causes of acute hand compartment syndrome.

On the Road Again: Return to Driving Following Minor Hand Surgery

BACKGROUND

Patient return-to-driving following minor hand surgery is unknown. Through daily text message surveys, we sought to determine return-to-driving after minor hand surgery and the factors that influence return-to-driving.

METHODS

One hundred five subjects undergoing minor hand surgery received daily text messaging surveys postoperatively to assess: (1) if they drove the day before and if so; (2) whether they wore a cast, sling, or splint. Additional patient-, procedure-, and driving-related data were collected.

RESULTS

More than half of subjects, 54 out of 105, returned to driving by the end of postoperative day #1. While patient-related factors had no effect on return-to-driving, significant differences were seen in anesthesia type, procedure laterality, driving assistance, and distance. Return-to-driving was significantly later for subjects who had general anesthetic compared to wide awake local anesthetic with no tourniquet (4 ± 4 days vs 1 ± 3 days, P = 0.020), as well as for bilateral procedures versus unilateral procedures (5 ± 5 days vs 1 ± 3 days, P = 0.046). Lack of another driver and driving on highways led to earlier return-to-driving (P = 0.040 and, P = 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients rapidly return to driving after minor hand surgery. Use of general anesthetic and bilateral procedures may delay return-to-driving. Confidential real-time text-based surveys can provide valuable information on postoperative return-to-driving and other patient behaviors.

Mu-opioid receptor and receptor tyrosine kinase crosstalk: Implications in mechanisms of opioid tolerance, reduced analgesia to neuropathic pain, dependence, and reward

Despite the prevalence of opioid misuse, opioids remain the frontline treatment regimen for severe pain. However, opioid safety is hampered by side-effects such as analgesic tolerance, reduced analgesia to neuropathic pain, physical dependence, or reward. These side effects promote development of opioid use disorders and ultimately cause overdose deaths due to opioid-induced respiratory depression. The intertwined nature of signaling via μ-opioid receptors (MOR), the primary target of prescription opioids, with signaling pathways responsible for opioid side-effects presents important challenges. Therefore, a critical objective is to uncouple cellular and molecular mechanisms that selectively modulate analgesia from those that mediate side-effects. One such mechanism could be the transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) via MOR. Notably, MOR-mediated side-effects can be uncoupled from analgesia signaling via targeting RTK family receptors, highlighting physiological relevance of MOR-RTKs crosstalk. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge surrounding the basic pharmacology of RTKs and bidirectional regulation of MOR signaling, as well as how MOR-RTK signaling may modulate undesirable effects of chronic opioid use, including opioid analgesic tolerance, reduced analgesia to neuropathic pain, physical dependence, and reward. Further research is needed to better understand RTK-MOR transactivation signaling pathways, and to determine if RTKs are a plausible therapeutic target for mitigating opioid side effects.

Postoperative Pain Medication Utilization in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sports Orthopaedic Surgery: Characterizing Patient Usage Patterns and Opioid Retention

INTRODUCTION

Opioid overprescribing is a problem in orthopaedic surgery, with many patients having leftover opioid medications after surgery. The purpose of our study was to capture utilization patterns of opioids in pediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic sports medicine surgery, in addition to evaluating patient practices surrounding unutilized opioid medication. Our hypothesis was that there would be low utilization of opioids in this patient population and would in turn contribute to notable overprescribing of opioids and opioid retention in this population.

METHODS

Pediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery for knee and hip pathology were prospectively enrolled. A survey was administered 14 days postoperatively, with questions centered on the patient-reported number of opioids prescribed, number of opioids used, number of days opioids were used, and incidences of leftover opioid medication and disposal of leftover medication. The magnitude of opioid overprescribing was calculated using the reported prescribed and reported used number of opioid pills. Linear regression was used to examine associations between opioids and NSAIDs prescribed.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients reported a mean prescription of 12.0 ± 5.0 pills, with utilization of 4.4 ± 6.1 pills over 2.7 ± 5.1 days. Patients were prescribed 2.73 times the number of opioid pills required on average. One hundred patients (87.7%) reported having unused opioid medication after their surgery, with 71 (71.0%) reporting opioid retention. Regression results showed an association with opioids used and prescribed opioid amount (β = 0.582, R = 0.471, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Overall, our study results help characterize the utilization patterns of opioid medications in the postsurgical pediatric sports orthopaedic population and suggest that orthopaedic surgeons may be able to provide smaller quantities of opioid pills for analgesia than is typically prescribed, which in turn may help reduce the amount of prescription opioid medications present in the community.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Defining the Opioid Requirement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Introduction:

The amount and duration of opioids necessary after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are inadequately defined. This study sought to prospectively (1) define the amount and duration of opioid consumption, (2) investigate the relationship between preoperative pain expectation and postoperative satisfaction with pain management, and (3) identify risk factors for increased opioid use after ACLR.

Methods:

One hundred eight patients undergoing primary ACLR with hamstring graft were prospectively analyzed for preoperative pain expectation, using visual analog scale (VAS) rating, and postoperative satisfaction with pain management. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to identify patient characteristics associated with satisfaction and/or amount and duration of opioid use.

Results:

Mean duration and cumulative intake of opioid consumption after ACLR were 5.3 days and 15.3 tablets, respectively. Patients expected moderate postoperative pain: mean preoperative VAS = 68.9. The preoperative VAS rating was associated with a significantly greater amount (P = 0.0265) and longer duration (P = 0.0212) of opioid consumption. Baseline opioid users took opioids for twice as long postoperatively (10.0 versus 5.0 days; P = 0.0149) and consumed twice as many tablets (29.3 versus 14.8 tablets; P = 0.0280) compared with opioid-naive patients.

Discussion:

This study demonstrated on average 15.3 opioid tablets over 5.3 days provided satisfactory pain management after ACLR. Risk factors for increased opioid consumption included preoperative opioid use.

Older, Male Orthopaedic Surgeons From Southern Geographies Prescribe Higher Doses of Post-Operative Narcotics Than do their Counterparts: A Medicare Population Study

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of Evidence

European clinical practice recommendations on opioids for chronic noncancer pain - Part 2: Special situations

BACKGROUND

Opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is under debate. In the absence of pan-European guidance on this issue, a position paper was commissioned by the European Pain Federation (EFIC).

METHODS

The clinical practice recommendations were developed by eight scientific societies and one patient self-help organization under the coordination of EFIC. A systematic literature search in MEDLINE (up until January 2020) was performed. Two categories of guidance are given: Evidence-based recommendations (supported by evidence from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials or of observational studies) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) statements (supported either by indirect evidence or by case-series, case-control studies and clinical experience). The GRADE system was applied to move from evidence to recommendations. The recommendations and GCP statements were developed by a multiprofessional task force (including nursing, service users, physicians, physiotherapy and psychology) and formal multistep procedures to reach a set of consensus recommendations. The clinical practice recommendations were reviewed by five external reviewers from North America and Europe and were also posted for public comment.

RESULTS

The European Clinical Practice Recommendations give guidance for combination with other medications, the management of frequent (e.g. nausea, constipation) and rare (e.g. hyperalgesia) side effects, for special clinical populations (e.g. children and adolescents, pregnancy) and for special situations (e.g. liver cirrhosis).

CONCLUSION

If a trial with opioids for chronic noncancer pain is conducted, detailed knowledge and experience are needed to adapt the opioid treatment to a special patient group and/or clinical situation and to manage side effects effectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

If a trial with opioids for chronic noncancer pain is conducted, detailed knowledge and experience are needed to adapt the opioid treatment to a special patient group and/or clinical situation and to manage side effects effectively. A collaboration of medical specialties and of all health care professionals is needed for some special populations and clinical situations.

Reduced Opioid Prescription After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Affect Postoperative Pain or Prescription Refills: A Prospective, Surgeon-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Purpose

To investigate opioid utilization after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the setting of a multimodal pain regimen and assess the feasibility of prescribing fewer opioids to achieve adequate postoperative pain control.

Methods

Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in conjunction with a multimodal approach to pain control were randomized to receive either 30 or 60 tablets of hydrocodone (10 mg)–acetaminophen (325 mg). Patients were contacted at multiple time points up to 21 days after surgery to assess opioid utilization and medication side effects. We compared the mean number of tablets used between groups as the primary outcome. Preoperative variables associated with an increased risk of higher opioid pain medication requirements were also assessed.

Results

The final analysis included 43 patients in the 30-tablet group and 42 in the 60-tablet group. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of tablets consumed (9.5 vs 12.2, P = .22), number of days opioids were required (4.5 vs 6.2, P = .14), 3-month opioid refill rates (12% vs 7%, P = .48), or postoperative pain control at any point up to 21 days after surgery. The 30-tablet group had a significantly smaller proportion of unused tablets compared with the 60-tablet group (69% of prescribed tablets [910 tablets] vs 80% of prescribed tablets [2,027 tablets], P < .001). Opioids were required after surgery by 91% of patients (n = 77), and 81% could have had their pain medication requirements met with a prescription for 15 tablets. Risk factors for increased postoperative opioid use included a family history of substance abuse (β = 14.1; 95% confidence interval, 5.7-22.4; P = .0014) and increased pain score at 2 hours after surgery (β = 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.064-2.07; P = .037).

Conclusions

Orthopaedic surgeons may significantly reduce the number opioid tablets prescribed after ACL reconstruction without affecting postoperative pain control or refill rates.

Level of Evidence

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

An opioid-sparing protocol with intravenous parecoxib can effectively reduce morphine consumption after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty

Multimodal pain management protocol effectively relieves pain following simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA) but is associated with administration of large amounts of opioids in the perioperative period. In this prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, single-surgeon clinical trial, the goal was to validate the efficacy of an opioid-sparing protocol for SBTKA with a reduced opioid dose, while achieving similar pain relief with few adverse events. Fifty-six patients who had undergone SBTKA were randomly allocated to receive either an opioid-sparing or opioid-based protocol. The primary outcome parameters were visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest, with movement, and cumulative morphine dose, through time. Secondary outcome parameters included drug-related adverse events and range of motion with continuous passive motion device, through time. In the opioid-sparing group, a lower VAS score with movement at postoperative 24 and 72 h was observed compared with the opioid-based group, but the difference did not reach the minimal clinically importance difference. A reduced cumulative morphine dose was noted in the opioid-sparing group at postoperative 24, 48 and 72 h. In conclusion, the opioid-sparing protocol may be used as an alternative modality for pain management following SBTKA. Similar pain relief effects may be achieved utilizing a reduced cumulative opioid dose, with few opioid related adverse events.

Can We Eliminate Opioid Medications for Postoperative Pain Control? A Prospective, Surgeon-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial in Knee Arthroscopic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic surgeons have a responsibility to develop responsible opioid practices. Growing evidence has helped define an optimal number of opioids to prescribe after surgical procedures, but little evidence-based guidance exists to support specific practice patterns to decrease opioid utilization.

HYPOTHESIS

After knee arthroscopic surgery with partial meniscectomy, patients who were provided a prescription for opioids and instructed to only fill the prescription if absolutely necessary for pain control would take fewer opioids than patients with opioids automatically included as part of a multimodal approach to pain control prescribed at discharge.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were provided multimodal pain control with aspirin, acetaminophen, and naproxen and randomized to receive oxycodone as either included with their multimodal pain medications (group 1) or given an optional prescription to fill (group 2). Patients were contacted at time points up to 1 month after surgery to assess opioid utilization and medication side effects. The mean number of tablets utilized was the primary outcome measure, with a 50% reduction defined as a successful outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were initially enrolled, and 95 (91%; 48 in group 1 and 47 in group 2) successfully completed the study. There was no significant reduction in the number of tablets utilized between groups 1 and 2 (3.5 vs 4.5, respectively; P = .45), days that opioids were required (2.2 vs 3.2, respectively; P = .20), or postoperative pain at any time point. The group with the option to fill their prescription had significantly fewer unused tablets remaining than the group with opioids included as part of the multimodal pain control regimen (75% of potentially prescribed tablets vs 82% of prescribed tablets; P < .001). Overall, 37% of patients did not require any opioids after surgery, and 86% used ≤8 tablets.

CONCLUSION

Patients required a minimal number of opioids after knee arthroscopic surgery with partial meniscectomy. There was no difference in the number of tablets utilized whether the opioid prescription was included in a multimodal pain control regimen or patients were given an option to fill the prescription. Offering optional opioid prescriptions in the setting of a multimodal approach to pain control can significantly reduce the number of unused opioids circulating in the community.

REGISTRATION

NCT03876743 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Magnesium and Pain

In terms of antinociceptive action, the main mode of action of magnesium involves its antagonist action at the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which prevents central sensitization and attenuates preexisting pain hypersensitivity. Given the pivotal function of NMDA receptors in pain transduction, magnesium has been investigated in a variety of pain conditions. The oral and parenteral administration of magnesium via the intravenous, intrathecal, or epidural route may alleviate pain and perioperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements. These beneficial effects of magnesium therapy have also been reported in patients with neuropathic pain, such as malignancy-related neurologic symptoms, diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. In addition, magnesium treatment is reportedly able to alleviate fibromyalgia, dysmenorrhea, headaches, and acute migraine attacks. Although magnesium plays an evolving role in pain management, better understanding of the mechanism underlying its antinociceptive action and additional clinical studies is required to clarify its role as an adjuvant analgesic.

Utilization of a Novel Opioid-Sparing Protocol in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Results in Reduced Opiate Consumption and Improved Functional Status

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) candidates have historically received high doses of opioids within the perioperative period; however, the amounts are being continually reduced as awareness of opioid abuse spreads. Here we seek to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel opiate-sparing protocol (OSP) for primary THAs in reducing opiate administrations, while maintaining similar levels of pain control and postoperative function.

METHODS

All patients undergoing primary THA between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2019 were placed under a novel OSP. Data were prospectively collected as part of standard of care. To assess the primary outcome of opiate consumption, nursing documented opiate administration events were converted into morphine milligram equivalences (MMEs) per patient encounter per 24-hour interval. Postoperative pain and functional status were assessed as secondary outcomes using the Verbal Rating Scale for pain and the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care scores, respectively.

RESULTS

One thousand fifty primary THAs had received our institution's OSP, and 953 patients were utilized as our historical control. OSP patients demonstrated significantly lower 0-24, 24-48, and 48-72 hours with less opiate administration variance (total MME: Control 75.55 ± 121.07 MME vs OSP 57.10 ± 87.48 MME; 24.42% decrease, P < .001). Although pain scores reached statistical significance between 0 and 12 (Control 2.09 vs OSP 2.36, P < .001), their differences were not clinically significant. Finally, OSP patients demonstrated a trend toward higher Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care scores across all 6 domains (total scores: Control 20.53 ± 3.67 vs OSP 20.76 ± 3.64, P = .18).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an OSP can significantly decrease the utilization of opioids in the immediate postoperative period. Inpatient opioid administration can be significantly reduced while maintaining a comparable and non-inferior level of pain and function.