Preemptive Pregabalin in Children and Adolescents Undergoing Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion: A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial

Opioid Utilization After Scoliosis Surgery is Greater in Marfan Syndrome Than Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective matched case cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Compare postoperative opioid utilization and prescribing behaviors between patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) after posterior spinal fusion (PSF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Opioids are an essential component of pain management after PSF. However, due to the potential for opioid use disorder and dependence, current analgesic strategies aim to minimize their use, especially in younger patients. Limited information exists on opioid utilization after PSF for syndromic scoliosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty adolescents undergoing PSF with MFS were matched with patients with AIS (ratio, 1:2) by age, sex, degree of spinal deformity, and the number of vertebral levels fused. Inpatient and outpatient pharmaceutical data were reviewed for the quantity and duration of opioid and adjunct medications. Prescriptions were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) using CDC's standard conversion factor.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with AIS, patients with MFS had significantly greater total inpatient MME use (4.9 vs . 2.1 mg/kg, P ≤ 0.001) and longer duration of intravenous patient-controlled anesthesia (3.4 vs . 2.5 d, P = 0.001). Within the first 2 postop days, MFS patients had more patient-controlled anesthesia boluses (91 vs . 52 boluses, P = 0.01) despite similar pain scores and greater use of adjunct medications. After accounting for prior opioid use, MFS was the only significant predictor of requesting an opioid prescription after discharge (odds ratio: 4.1, 95% CI: 1.1-14.9, P = 0.03). Patients with MFS were also more likely to be discharged with a more potent prescription (1.0 vs . 0.72 MME per day/kg, P ≤ 0.001) and to receive a longer-duration prescription (13 vs . 8 d, P = 0.005) with a greater MME/kg (11.6 vs . 5.6 mg/kg, P ≤ 0.001) as outpatients.

CONCLUSION

Despite a similar intervention, patients with MFS and AIS seem to differ in their postoperative opioid usage after PSF, presenting an opportunity for further research to assist clinicians in better anticipating the analgesic needs of individual patients, particularly in light of the ongoing opioid epidemic.

The Role of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Multimodal Pain Management Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Faster and Farther With Less Opioids

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective controlled cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration on postsurgical pain management in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients by analyzing postoperative opioid consumption, ambulation, and length of stay (LOS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Optimal postoperative pain control for AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is challenging. Multimodal pain management protocols provide adequate analgesia while decreasing opioid consumption. LB was recently approved for pediatric patients; however, use in AIS patients is understudied.

METHODS

119 consecutive patients with AIS who underwent PSF were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who received LB as erector spinae block in addition to the standard postoperative pain management protocol (Group A), and patients who received only the standard postoperative pain protocol (Group B). Oral morphine equivalents, intravenous opioid and valium consumption, pain scores (VAS), nausea/vomiting, ambulation distance and LOS were assessed.

RESULTS

Group A experienced significantly lower total opioid consumption compared to Group B (44.5 mg vs. 70.2 mg). Morphine use was lower in Group A on postoperative day (POD) 0, and oxycodone use was lower in Group A on PODs 1 and 2. There was a higher proportion of patients who used only oral opioids in Group A (81% vs. 41%). Of patients requiring any intravenous opioids, 79% did not receive LB. A significantly higher proportion of LB patients were discharged on POD 2 (55% vs. 27%); therefore, LOS was shorter for Group A. Group A ambulated further postoperatively. There were no differences in pain scores, valium requirements or nausea/vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

LB was associated with decreased total opioid use, shorter LOS, and improved ambulation in AIS patients undergoing PSF. Including LB in multimodal pain management protocols proved effective in reducing opioid use while increasing mobilization in the immediate postoperative period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Perioperative Indications for Gabapentinoids in Pediatrics: A Narrative Review

In recent years, there has been increased interest in using gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) as part of multimodal medication plans or enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to mitigate several perioperative clinical challenges. Outcomes explored in the context of using gabapentinoids perioperatively in children are variable and include acute complications of pain, anxiety, nausea and vomiting, and emergence agitation, as well as the long-term postoperative outcome of chronic postsurgical pain. This narrative review describes the current literature regarding perioperative use of gabapentinoids in pediatric patients and aims to describe the role of gabapentinoids in the perioperative setting for each specific indication.

A retrospective cohort study of bleeding characteristics and hidden blood loss after segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in neuromuscular scoliosis as compared with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background

Progressive scoliosis in neuromuscular patients often requires a long instrumented spinal fusion. Previous studies have shown larger intraoperative blood loss in these patients than those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but the total blood loss composed of visible and hidden blood loss has not been described in this patient population. The aim of our study was to investigate the bleeding characteristics and hidden blood loss related to spinal fusion in neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) as compared to AIS patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study with prospective data collection of NMS patients undergoing segmental pedicle screw instrumentation at a university hospital between 2009 and 2021. A comprehensive statistical analysis was performed regarding intra- and postoperative blood loss compared to patient characteristics such as age and diagnosis. Hidden blood loss was estimated and compared to the total blood loss. We standardized amount of bleeding with patient weight and fusion level for further analysis. Consecutive AIS patients served as a control population. Eighty-one consecutive patients with NMS (mean age 15.2 years, 37 females) were included and their bleeding characters were compared with 199 AIS patients (mean age 15.8 years, 143 females). The primary outcome was total blood loss including intraoperative, 24-hour drain output and hidden blood loss. Secondary outcome measures included requirement for blood transfusion.

Results

Neuromuscular patients had a significantly larger total blood loss with mean values of 1914 mL in the NMS and 1357 mL in the AIS groups, respectively (p<0.001). The hidden blood loss was also significantly larger in NMS than in AIS group (566 ± 533 mL vs. 398 ±411 mL, p=0.0332). Neuromuscular scoliosis was also associated with significantly greater weight and levels of fused adjusted intraoperative bleeding (1.79 ml/kg/fused level in NMS vs. 0.87 ml/kg/fused level in AIS vs. p< 0.0001) and hidden blood loss (1.00 ml/kg/levels fused vs. 0.65 ml/kg/fused levels, p=0.053). NMS diagnosis was also a risk factor for greater hidden blood loss in multivariable analysis (p=0.0011). 24-hour drain output was similar in the NMS and AIS groups. Male gender was a risk factor for greater hidden blood loss in the NMS group (p=0.0429). Fifty-nine (73%) NMS and 27 (14%) AIS patients received allogenic red blood cell infusions perioperatively (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Hidden blood loss constitutes one-third of total blood loss in children undergoing segmental pedicle screw instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis. Hidden blood loss is significantly greater in the neuromuscular as compared with idiopathic scoliosis. Hidden blood loss should be considered in the perioperative management of NMS.

What's New in Pain Management for Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Improving pain control and decreasing opioid prescription and usage continue to be emphasized across both pediatric and adult populations. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of recent literature and highlight new advancements pertaining to pain control in pediatric orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

An electronic search of the PubMed database was performed for keywords relating to perioperative pain management of pediatric orthopaedic surgery. Search results were filtered by publication date for articles published between January 1, 2015 and December 1, 2020 and yielded 404 papers.

RESULTS

A total of 32 papers were selected for review based upon new findings and significant contributions in the following categories: risk factors for increased opioid usage, opioid overprescribing and disposal, nonpharmacologic interventions, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, peripheral nerve blocks, spine surgery specific considerations, surgical pathway modifications, and future directions.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been many advances in pain management for pediatric patients following orthopaedic surgery. Rapid recovery surgical care pathways are associated with shorter length of stay and improved pain control in pediatric spine surgery. Opioid overprescribing continues to be common and information regarding safe opioid disposal practices should be routinely provided for pediatric patients undergoing surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-literature review.

Pregabalin and Persistent Postoperative Pain Following Posterior Spinal Fusion in Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of spinal deformity requires major surgical intervention with extensive manipulation of the spine and neural elements. Persistent postoperative pain affects patient quality of life and can also cause financial burden for patient families and for society. We aimed to investigate the effect of perioperative pregabalin on the incidence of persistent pain following instrumented spinal fusion.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled single-center clinical trial. Adolescents and children 10 to 21 years old with a spinal deformity who were scheduled for pedicle screw instrumentation and fusion were randomized into either the pregabalin or placebo group. Patients received 2 mg/kg of pregabalin or a placebo twice daily preoperatively and for 5 days postoperatively. The duration of follow-up was 2 years. The primary outcomes were cumulative opioid consumption during the first 48 hours postoperatively and the incidence of persistent postoperative pain over the course of the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-four of 77 eligible patients were enrolled in the study, with all patients completing the 2-year follow-up. Thirty-three patients were randomized into the pregabalin group and 31 into the placebo group. There was no significant difference in cumulative 48-hour opioid consumption between the study groups. The Scoliosis Research Society 24-Item Questionnaire pain domain score improved significantly, from a mean value of 3.8 in both groups to 4.3 in the pregabalin and 4.0 in the placebo group at 2 years postoperatively, with no differences between the study groups at any time point (p = 0.317). The Scoliosis Research Society total scores of the study groups were similar (p = 0.678). Back pain, as measured with use of a visual analogue scale, improved significantly (p = 0.001) with no significant differences at any time point (preoperatively and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative pregabalin does not reduce postoperative opioid consumption or the incidence of persistent postoperative pain following instrumented posterior spinal fusion for spinal deformities in an adolescent population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Postoperative Dexamethasone Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Surgeons have hesitated to use steroids in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion because of the risk of wound complications. The literature has supported the use of postoperative steroids in other areas of orthopaedics on the basis of more rapid recovery and improved postoperative pain control. We hypothesized that a short course of postoperative dexamethasone following posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) would decrease opioid usage without increasing wound-healing problems.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS from 2015 to 2018 at a single hospital were included. A review of demographic characteristics, curve characteristics, surgical data, and postoperative clinic notes was performed. Opioid usage was determined by converting all postoperative opioids given into morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients underwent posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS without postoperative steroids (the NS group), and 48 patients were managed with 3 doses of postoperative steroids (the WS group) (median, 8.0 mg/dose). There was no difference between the groups in terms of curve magnitude, number of vertebrae fused, or estimated blood loss. There was a 39.6% decrease in total MME used and a 29.5% decrease in weight-based MME used in the group receiving postoperative steroids (82.0 mg [1.29 mg/kg] in the NS group versus 49.5 mg [0.91 mg/kg] in the WS group]; p < 0.001). This difference persisted after accounting for gabapentin, ketorolac, and diazepam usage; surgical time; curve size; levels fused; and number of osteotomies (median decrease, 0.756 mg/kg [95% CI, 0.307 to 1.205 mg/kg]; p = 0.001). Three patients in the NS group (4.6%) and 4 patients in the WS group (8.3%) developed wound dehiscence requiring wound care (p = 0.53). One patient in the NS group required surgical debridement for the treatment of an infection. Patients in the WS group were more likely to walk at the time of the initial physical therapy evaluation (60.4% versus 35.4%; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

A short course of postoperative steroids after posterior spinal fusion was associated with a 40% decrease in the use of opioids, with no increase in wound complications. Surgeons may consider the use of perioperative steroids in an effort to decrease the use of postoperative opioids following posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.