Function-Sparing Free Split Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Lower-Extremity Reconstruction: Five-Year Consecutive Single-Surgeon Series

Salvaging Complex Lower Extremity Injury with Laparoscopically Harvested Omental Flaps

Background

Traumatic injuries to the lower extremities are frequently accompanied by extensive soft tissue loss, combined with vascular damage or exposure of bony tissues, making it difficult to reconstruct; consequently, patients are commonly at risk of amputation. Due to its superior anatomical and biochemical properties, the omental flap has been used to reconstruct soft tissue defects for decades. However, few studies have reported the omental flap's effectiveness in treating severe and complex lower extremity deformities. We attempted to use a laparoscopically harvested omental flap in conjunction with a second-stage skin graft to reduce infections during limb preservation, increase flap survival probability, and restore the aesthetic and functional integrity of the affected extremity.

Methods

Seventeen patients with severe lower extremity wounds underwent omental flap transplantation and were followed up for 6 to 12 months to check for surgical complications, evaluate cosmetic results, and ensure proper limb function.

Results

There were no complications, such as intestinal adhesion, intestinal volvulus, and peritonitis, with any of the omental grafts. The affected extremities were well-functioning and aesthetically pleasing.

Conclusion

Laparoscopically harvested omental flap transplantation with skin grafting is an alternative reconstruction technique for severe lower extremity injuries with massive soft tissue loss and exposed bones and tendons.

Re-Do Plastic Reconstruction for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Following a beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) Operation-Key Considerations

Innovation in surgery and pelvic oncology have redefined the boundaries of pelvic exenteration for CRC. However, surgical approaches and outcomes following repeat exenteration and reconstruction are not well described. The resulting defect from a second beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) presents a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. The aim of this study was to explore reconstructive options for patients undergoing repeat beyond TME for recurrent CRC following previous beyond TME and regional reconstruction. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for relevant articles, yielding 2353 studies. However, following full text review and the application of the inclusion criteria, all the studies were excluded. This study demonstrated the lack of reporting on re-do reconstruction techniques following repeat exenteration for recurrent CRC. Based on this finding, we conducted a point-by-point discussion of certain key aspects that should be taken into consideration when approaching this patient cohort.

[Treatment strategies for fracture-related infections with concurrent soft tissue damage]

Fracture-related infections are the predominant complication following surgical fracture treatment. The distal lower leg, e.g., in pilon tibial fractures, is at a high risk of infection due to poor soft tissue coverage, particularly in cases of open fractures in this area. Fracture-related infections with significant soft tissue damage require special attention alongside treatment of the infection itself. In general, the principle is that healing of fracture-related infection is not possible without sufficient soft tissue coverage. Therefore, it is crucial to integrate both soft tissue damage and fracture-related infection into a comprehensive treatment plan from the beginning. An interdiscpilinary treatment approach between trauma and plastic surgery is often necessary and beneficial. In cases, where fracture fixation devices or bone is exposed, mid- or long-term use of vacuum-assisted wound therapy is not advisable due to a higher risk of reinfection. Hence, an interdisciplinary treatment strategy involving trauma and plastic surgery should prioritize early soft tissue closure, referred to as the "orthoplastic approach". If this cannot be done in the own hospital, early patient transfer is indicated to ensure optimal interdisciplinary therapy with early soft tissue closure and simultaneous trauma surgical treatment to control the infection and enable bone healing. Free fasciocutaneous or muscle flap techniques in combination with adequate trauma surgical and antibiotic therapy lead to good reliable results in these situations.

Patient-reported outcomes following free flap lower extremity reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity has shown success for the management of large and complex defects, restoration of function, and favorable aesthetic outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have not been well explored in previous literature. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of PROs after free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to 2021 for studies reporting on PROs following free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

RESULTS

Overall, 53 studies were included, and 11 studies reported validated PRO measures for meta-analysis. A total of 1953 patients underwent reconstruction with 1958 free flaps for lower limb defects with a mean follow-up of 3.26 (0.25-7.83) months. The mean postoperative Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores were 60.3 (±12) out of 80 points (4 studies, 85 patients). The mean postoperative AOFAS scores were 75.1 (±15) out of 100 points (4 studies, 68 patients). The mean postoperative SF-36 scores were 88.1 (±8.0) out of 100 points; mental health component was 48.7 (±8.9), and physical component was 38.4 (±8.2), out of 50 points (4 studies, 88 patients).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that patients report improved physical health, mental health, and function following lower extremity reconstruction with free flaps. Patients reported similar improvements in functional scores following lower extremity reconstruction regardless of their free flap type. Furthermore, patients with myocutaneous flaps may have improved mental health and worse physical health scores when compared to perforator flaps. The evidence profiles presented in this review indicate that additional research is needed to help guide future decision-making.

Variations of Extended Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flap for Reconstruction of Large Wounds in the Extremity

Objective

The aim of the present study was to report a novel nomenclature system for extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous (LD) flaps. To evaluate the clinical application and surgical efficacy of the different extended LD flaps for large wounds in the extremities.

Methods

From January 2004 to December 2018, 72 consecutive patients who received extended LD flaps were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' ages ranged from 2 to 68 years with 37 males and 35 females. All wounds were extensive in either the upper or lower limbs, while the skin defect area ranged from 18 cm × 10 cm to 37 cm × 21 cm. Forty‐one wounds were located in the calf, 18 in the foot and ankle, six in the shoulder and upper arm, four in the thigh, and three at the knee joint. Twenty‐eight patients had fractures, and six of these patients with segmental bone defects (ranging in size from 3 to 7 cm) required secondary orthopaedic procedures. Single‐ and double‐wing extended LD flaps were designed and harvested according to the shape of the wounds.

Results

The flaps received consisted of 64 single‐wing and eight double‐wing extended LD flaps, and the mean flap harvest time was 56.2 min. The donor sites were closed primarily for all patients. Additional subcutaneous veins were anastomosed to the recipient's vessels in 14 patients. The venous crisis was noticed on the first postoperative day in four cases. Two flaps were salvaged after emergency re‐exploration, and another two patients' flaps were necrosed. In these two patients, lower limb amputation and extended LD flap on the other side were used, respectively, for the final treatment. The wounds healed well, providing reliable soft tissue coverage and good contour in the reconstructed areas. Six patients had segmental bone defects that required secondary orthopaedic procedures, two patients were repaired with vascularized iliac crest bone grafts, and another four patients were reconstructed by the Ilizarov technique. All the patients' bone defects achieved union and most patients achieved good functional recovery at the recipient site. The mean follow‐up was 15.7 months (range, 10–56 months). No significant donor site morbidities limiting patients' daily activities occurred during the follow‐up. Eight patients developed a donor site hypertrophic scar, three patients on the back, and five on the anterolateral thigh.

Conclusion

Single‐ and double‐wing extended LD flaps are simple and reliable methods for large skin and soft tissue defects in the extremity, with good functional and aesthetic results.

Objective Comparison of Donor-Site Morbidity following Full and Thoracodorsal Nerve-Preserving Split Latissimus Dorsi Flaps

BACKGROUND

The latissimus dorsi flap is a workhorse for reconstruction. However, flap harvest has been variably reported to result in donor-site morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare donor-site morbidity following harvest of a split latissimus dorsi flap, preserving the anterior branch of the thoracodorsal nerve, and a traditional nerve-sacrificing full latissimus dorsi flap.

METHODS

Patients who underwent split or full latissimus dorsi flaps between July of 2017 and August of 2020 at a single center were recalled for assessment. Donor-site morbidity in the shoulder was evaluated through the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. Medical Research Council strength grading was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients in the split latissimus dorsi cohort and 22 patients in the full latissimus dorsi cohort were recalled. Patient-reported outcomes as assessed through the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire scores revealed statistically greater (p < 0.05) donor-site morbidity associated with the traditional compared to split latissimus dorsi flap. Seven patients in the full latissimus dorsi cohort had less than Medical Research Council grade 5 power at the shoulder, whereas all patients in the split latissimus dorsi cohort demonstrated full power at the shoulder.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional full latissimus dorsi flaps were found to result in greater donor-site morbidity compared to thoracodorsal nerve-preserving split latissimus dorsi flaps. Split latissimus dorsi flaps may be beneficial in preserving donor-site function and strength.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Supine harvest of vascularised scapular bone grafts-Anatomical study and clinical application

BACKGROUND

We report our findings from an anatomical study on harvest of a vascularized scapular bone graft from a supine position. A clinical case is presented to illustrate the operative approach.

METHODS

Twenty cadaveric hemibody specimens were dissected in the supine position. Outcomes of interest included the characterization of anatomical variants and measurements of pedicle length. Specific measurements included distance from the origin of the subscapular artery (at the axillary artery) to the branch point of the angular artery from the thoracodorsal artery or serratus branch and the length of the angular branch proper.

RESULTS

There are five reported anatomic variations regarding the origin of the angular branch of the thoracodorsal artery. In our cadaveric cohort only four known types were seen, and an entirely new variant was encountered. Six cadaveric dissections exhibited a type 3 configuration, six were type 1, four were type 2, three were type 4, and one was a previously unreported variant we termed a type 6, with multiple angular artery branches originating from the posterior branch of the thoracodorsal. The mean distance between the origin of the subscapular artery and the takeoff of the angular branch was 6.3 ± 2.0 cm. The mean length of the angular branch was 3.7 ± 1.4 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Supine positioning for harvest of a vascularized bone graft obviates the need for an intraoperative position change and allows reconstruction of bone defects in the hand and upper extremity within a single surgical field.

Reconstruction of recalcitrant pressure ulcers with latissimus dorsi muscle-splitting free flaps

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of recalcitrant pressure ulcers is very challenging because all available local tissues have been exhausted. Although occasionally suggested as reconstructive options in some reports, free flaps are still not favored for pressure ulcers because of the less available recipient vessels in buttock area and the need for position change. Here, we describe our experience with latissimus dorsi muscle-splitting free flaps harvested in prone position for recalcitrant pressure ulcers.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and January 2020, 10 patients of recalcitrant pressure ulcers underwent reconstruction using latissimus dorsi muscle-splitting free flaps. To harvest flaps in the prone position, the curvilinear incision was made along the line connecting the lateral border of the scapula and the midaxillary line of the armpit and the latissimus dorsi muscle was split just below the skin incision. Only the required amount of muscle was harvested including the 5 × 3 cm sized muscle cuff around bifurcation points of the transverse and descending branches.

RESULTS

Flap size ranged from 16 × 9 to 24 × 14 cm and the gluteal vessels were mainly used as recipients. The mean operation time was 170 mins. All the flaps survived but two patients suffered wound disruption and partial flap loss, respectively. During the mean follow-up periods of 2.45 years, there were no recurrences at the reconstruction site, and no patient complained of donor site morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results obtained from this consecutive series of patients, latissimus dorsi muscle-splitting free flaps are valuable option for recalcitrant pressure ulcer reconstruction.

Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications of the Free Anterior Branch Split Latissimus Dorsi Flap

BACKGROUND

The free anterior branch split latissimus dorsi flap has a reliable anatomy and advantages over the traditional latissimus dorsi flap. By preserving the posterior branch of the thoracodorsal nerve, morbidity at the donor site is reduced, preserving shoulder strength.

METHODOLOGY

The purpose of this article is to review our experience with the split latissimus flap, describe our surgical technique, and finally review representative cases of reconstruction in different anatomical regions.

RESULTS

From April 2017 to October 2020, 39 free split latissimus flaps were performed at a single center. Flaps were performed for coverage in the upper extremity (n = 2), lower extremity (n = 32), and head and neck (n = 5). Flap success rate was 97.4%. Mean dimensions of the flap were 17.0 × 8.3 cm, with a mean area of 145 cm2.

CONCLUSIONS

The flap has a broad application and can be utilized in many different reconstructive scenarios including for coverage of defects in the extremities, trunk, and head and neck.

The esthetic outcome of lower limb reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the progress of anatomical knowledge and microsurgical techniques, in particular the development of perforator flaps, has risen the number of flaps available for lower leg reconstruction. The esthetic consequences of flap choice and harvest do have an impact on patients' quality of life. Nowadays, more researchers evaluate the esthetic changes following lower limb reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the esthetic outcome of lower limb reconstruction.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was planned to identify the most relevant indexed articles on this subject. The search was performed on Pubmed database without date of publication limits.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All papers about reporting information about the esthetic outcome of lower limb reconstruction were selected. Case reports and the articles not including specific information about complications, secondary procedures, and outcomes were excluded. The articles were categorized according to their topic and date of publication. The full texts of all the articles were obtained and read thoroughly. The references for each article were screened to identify articles that were eventually left outside our database search.

PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

One hundred and eight articles were retained for the definitive review. Eleven review articles were kept because they represented a good source of information. Thirty-three articles were added after reading the full texts. The articles appear highly heterogeneous and at, this stage, only a critical and qualitative analysis could be performed.

RESULTS

We found information about 7895 lower reconstructions, 1295 local flaps, 6546 free flaps.

LIMITATIONS

The esthetic evaluation is intrinsic subjective. Many psychological and cultural factors influence both the patient and the surgeon. There is not a validated assessment tool for the esthetic outcome of lower leg reconstruction. Therefore, no quantitative analysis was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Some ancient techniques are today obsolete, like the rectus abdominis free muscle flaps and perhaps free forearm flap, others are always useful, like gracilis and latissimus dorsi free flap. ALT flap is the most versatile perforator flap today available, but the SCIP flap is gaining the favor of a growing number of surgeons. Local flaps will be always performed with success but their indications should not be pushed beyond the medium-size defects. The best cosmetic outcome for each patient cannot necessarily be obtained neither with the easiest techniques nor with the most technically demanding ones. It is necessary to develop validated tools to assess the cosmetic outcome of lower limb reconstruction.