Core Decompression and Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate Grafting for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Regenerative therapies for femoral head necrosis in the past two decades: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Regenerative techniques combined with core decompression (CD) are commonly used to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, no consensus exists on regeneration therapy combined with CD that performs optimally. Therefore, we evaluated six regenerative therapies combined with CD treatment using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Six common regeneration techniques were categorized into the following groups with CD as the control group: (1) autologous bone graft (ABG), (2) autologous bone graft combined with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ABG + BMAC), (3) bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), (4) free vascular autologous bone graft (FVBG), (5) expanded mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and (6) platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and progression rate to femoral head necrosis were compared among the six treatments.

RESULT

A total of 17 literature were included in this study. In the NMA, two of the six treatment strategies demonstrated higher response in preventing the progression of ONFH than CD: MSCs (odds ratio [OR]: 0.098, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0087-0.87) and BMAC (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.073-0.73). Additionally, two of the six treatment strategies were effective techniques in preventing the conversion of ONFH to THA: MSCs (OR: 0.062, 95% CI: 0.0038-0.40) and BMAC (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.1-0.074). No significant difference was found among FVBG, PRP, ABG + BMAC, ABG, and CD in preventing ONFH progression and conversion to THA (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our NMA found that MSCs and BMAC were effective in preventing ONFH progression and conversion to THA among the six regenerative therapies. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking value, MSCs ranked first, followed by BMAC. Additionally, based on our NMA results, MSCs and BMAC following CD may be necessary to prevent ONFH progression and conversion to THA. Therefore, these findings provide evidence for the use of regenerative therapy for ONFH.

Reliability and repeatability of 2021 ARCO classification and its guiding significance in treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head

BACKGROUND

The study was designed to evaluate the interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability of the 2021 Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification and explore its guiding significance in the treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we randomly selected and investigated 50 sets of preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans from 96 patients (139 hips) to validate the reliability and repeatability of the 2021 ARCO classification. Patients with a nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 support rod were included in the clinical efficacy study. The Harris hip score (HHS) was used to assess hip function. Femoral head collapse of > 2 mm was considered radiological failure. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) was performed for clinical failure, and follow-up was discontinued.

RESULTS

The average kappa value of interobserver consistency was 0.652. The average rate of consistency was 90.25%, and the average kappa value of intraobserver consistency was 0.836. Eighty-two patients (122 hips) were enrolled and followed up for a mean of 43.57 ± 9.64 months. There was no significant difference in the HHS among the three groups before surgery, but the difference was statistically significant at the last follow-up. Among them, types 1 and 2 had significantly higher scores at the last follow-up than preoperatively (P < 0.05), whereas type 3 had a lower score at the last follow-up than preoperatively, although the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).According to the imaging evaluation, the failure rate of type 1, 2, and 3 at the last follow-up was 0%, 19%, and 87%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the femoral head survival rate of radiography was significantly affected by the new classification system (P = 0.00). At the last follow-up, the incidence rate of THA in type 1, 2, and 3 was 5%, 7%, and 31%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the femoral head survival rate was significantly affected by the new classification system (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2021 ARCO classification for early-stage ONFH shows substantial consistency and repeatability. We do not recommend femoral head-preserving surgery for patients with type 3 ONFH.

Computer-Assisted and Hip Arthroscopy for Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head With Femoroacetabular Impingement

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head with femoroacetabular impingement is a disabling disease. Without early treatment and intervention, its further development will even lead to hip osteoarthritis and hip dysfunction. This technical note aims to introduce a computer-assisted precise core decompression of the femoral head, followed by injection of platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow aspirate concentrate. Then, the autologous ipsilateral iliac bone is transplanted to the core decompression area. Thereafter, under hip arthroscopy, the injured glenoid lip of the hip joint is repaired, and the cam deformity of the femoral head/neck junction is polished and formed. The advantages of this technique include accurately locating the core decompression area, combined with autologous cells and bone transplantation, being able to delay the process of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and evaluating articular cartilage injury, subchondral collapse, and guidance during reaming and curettage.

[The importance of removing osteonecrosis during treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis]

Atraumatic femoral head necrosis (aFHN) in adults is estimated to be the leading cause of approximately 10% of all hip prosthesis implantations. Due to the relatively frequent occurrence of aFHN at a young age, the possibility of a joint-preserving intervention should be examined. This includes the classic "core decompression" and modifications based on it. There are different data on the success rates of this method. Reasons for treatment failure could include a lack of clearance of the necrosis zone. The clearance of the necrosis zone is taken into account by alternative surgical procedures for the treatment of aFHN. These are the "trap-door procedure", the "light-bulb procedure" and "advanced core decompression". The current state of knowledge on these procedures is reviewed in this keynote article. It is shown that the extensive excision of femoral head necrosis is of particular importance. None of the procedures mentioned can currently be recommended in preference over the others.