Factors Affecting the Risk of Aseptic Patellar Complications in Primary TKA Performed with Cemented All-Polyethylene Patellar Resurfacing

Minimum 15-Year Survival of a Biconvex Inlay Patellar Component in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 2,530 Total Knee Arthroplasties From a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Routine patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. To our knowledge, there are no studies reporting the long-term performance of a cemented biconvex all-polyethylene inlay component implanted at the time of primary TKA. The purpose of this study was to examine the 15-year survivorship and long-term clinical outcomes of this biconvex inlay patella used at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected institutional database and identified 2,530 patients who underwent cemented TKA with a single prosthetic design (from 1996 to 2007) where the patella was resurfaced using this cemented biconvex inlay patella. The mean age at surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 93). The mean body mass index was 33.0 (range, 16.4 to 76.3), with 61.9% women. At the time of analysis, the mean time from surgery was 20.4 years (range, 15 to 26). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate survivorship at 15 years. We analyzed clinical outcomes using 3 patient-reported outcome measures collected prospectively.

RESULTS

The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for all causes as the end point was 97.1% (95% confidence interval 96.1 to 98.1%). The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for a patella-related complication as the end point was 99.7% (95% confidence interval 99.4 to 1.0). At the final follow-up, patients showed significant improvement in scores for the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (P < .001), and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey physical component (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine patellar resurfacing using a biconvex inlay patellar component has excellent survivorship and a low rate of complications at 15 years post-TKA.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing Following Primary Unresurfaced Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beware of the Incidence of Late Patellar Erosion

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) indications and rates in a single-surgeon series utilizing a modern TKA design and additionally, to review the functional outcomes of patients after undergoing SPR.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected institutional database was performed. All patients undergoing primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2021 were included. During this time, the senior surgeon resurfaced the patella selectively. Patients were divided into the primary resurfaced (PR) and the primary unresurfaced (UR). All patients undergoing SPR in the UR group were identified, their radiographs reviewed, and their clinical outcomes assessed. During the study period, 1,511 TKAs were performed, with 73.1% (1,105 TKAs) being unresurfaced.

RESULTS

The all-cause revision rate was 1.2% in the PR group and 3.6% in the UR group. The rate of SPR in the UR group was 2.0% (22 of 1,105 TKAs). No patient in the PR group underwent revision surgery for a patellar complication. The mean age at primary TKA for those undergoing SPR was 65 years (range, 50 to 78). The average time for SPR from primary TKA was 3.4 years (range, 1.1 to 8.8). Postoperative radiographic progression of patellar erosion, in combination with new onset anterior knee pain, was the indication for SPR in 14 of the 22 (63.7%) SPR cases. After SPR, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index score (P < .001) and Knee Society Score (P < .001) improved from pre-SPR.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) was the most common (55%) reason for revision surgery after primary UR TKA in this series. An SPR improved clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients. Surgeons should consider patellar resurfacing for all patients undergoing primary TKA to reduce the burden of revision surgery post-TKA. Additionally, the paradigm that late SPR does not improve clinical outcomes needs to be revisited.

Patellar resurfacing might not be mandatory in contralateral second total knee replacement even if performed during replacement of the first knee

INTRODUCTION

The appropriateness or necessity of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not clearly established. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and functional results of patients with bilateral involvement, operated on in one knee by TKA with patellar resurfacing and in the other knee by TKA without resurfacing. The hypothesis was that there was no difference in results between the two sides.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort of patients operated on by TKA without patellar resurfacing in a second osteoarthritic knee after contralateral TKA with patellar resurfacing. Twenty consecutive patients who underwent second primary TKA constituted their own control group (40 knees). Iwano scores were comparable. Mean age was 75.9±6.2years. Mean time between the two procedures was 20.6±11.9months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in SF-36, KOOS or Lille patellofemoral scores between the right and left knees. Sixty-five percent of patients were unable to differentiate the performance of their knees in activities of daily living.

CONCLUSION

The present study did not differentiate results according to patellar resurfacing, showing the limitations of resurfacing for early functional gain after primary TKA. Resurfacing might thus not be essential, even if it was performed in replacement of the first knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

The Fate of Unresurfaced Patellae in Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early to Midterm Results

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased significantly over the past decade in the United States, likely due to modern patella-friendly implants, complications with resurfacing, and the knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship out to 8.5 years in a cohort of contemporary primary TKAs with patella-friendly femoral components and unresurfaced patellae.

METHODS

A total of 1,053 consecutive primary TKAs with unresurfaced patellae were retrospectively reviewed. A selective patellar nonresurfacing protocol was used for all cases. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on patellar revision and the latest follow-up. An aggressive lateral patellar facetectomy was performed in 78% (823 of 1,053) of cases. The cohort was 62% women and 43% American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II with a mean age and body mass index of 65 years (range, 35 to 94) and 35 kg/m2 (range, 18 to 65), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 4 (0.4%, 4 of 1,053) unresurfaced patellae were revised. Three were resurfaced as part of other procedures: 2 for global instability and one for aseptic loosening at a mean of 1.6 years; and one patella was resurfaced by an outside surgeon for unexplained pain. The all-cause revision-free survivorship estimate specifically related to the patella was 98.9% (95% confidence interval, 98 to 100) out to 8.5 years. No significant difference in survivorship was related to patellae with or without a lateral patellar facetectomy (99.5 versus 98.1%, P ≥ .191); however, 3 of 4 patellar revisions occurred in TKAs without a lateral patellar facetectomy (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate excellent revision-free survivorship related to unresurfaced patellae, particularly when a lateral facetectomy was performed. These early to midterm results using modern patella-friendly femoral components are promising and comparable to resurfaced patellae in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain and Functional Difficulty in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort Following Total Knee Arthroplasty With Selective Patellar Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

The influence of patellar resurfacing on anterior knee pain, stair climbing, and functional activity outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are incompletely understood. This study examined the influence of patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relating to anterior knee pain and function.

METHODS

The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score of Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR.) patient PROMs were collected preoperatively and at 12 months follow-up for 950 TKAs performed over 5 years. Indications for patellar resurfacing included Grade IV patello-femoral (PFJ) changes or mechanical PFJ findings during patellar trialing. Patellar resurfacing was performed on 393 (41%) of the 950 TKAs performed. Multivariable binomial logistic regressions were performed, using KOOS, JR. questions assessing pain during stair climbing, standing upright, and function during rising from sitting as surrogates for anterior knee pain. Independent regression models were performed for each of the targeted KOOS, JR. questions, with adjustment for age at surgery, sex, and baseline pain and function.

RESULTS

No association was observed between 12-month postoperative anterior knee pain or function with patellar resurfacing (P = .17, .97). Patients who had moderate or greater preoperative pain on stairs had an increased likelihood of postoperative pain and functional difficulty (odds ratio 2.3, P = .013), while males were 42% less likely to report postoperative anterior knee pain (odds ratio 0.58, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Selective patellar resurfacing based on PFJ degeneration and mechanical PFJ symptoms produces similar improvement in PROMs for resurfaced and unresurfaced knees.

Cementless Metal-Backed Patellar Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Average 10-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Historically, 1st generation metal-backed cementless patellar implants demonstrated high failure rates due to multiple factors. The 2nd generation cementless implants were developed with purported improvements in component design and polyethylene wear characteristics. This study evaluated clinical results of a current generation cementless metal-backed patellar implant with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-six primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with metal-backed cementless patellae were compared to 183 cemented patellae with the same implant design. The cementless group mean age was 61 years (range, 40 to 81), mean body mass index (BMI) of 34.9 (range, 22.6 to 64.5), and mean follow-up of 10 years (range, 5 to 13). The cemented group mean age was 65 years (range, 32 to 89), mean BMI of 32.5 (range, 18.2 to 56.6), and mean follow-up of 10 years (range, 5 to 12). Significant demographic differences of age (P < .001), BMI (P < .01), and sex (P < .001) were found, with cementless patients being younger, heavier, and with more men.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in non-revision procedures (P = .214), TKA revisions (P = .639), patellar revisions (P = .151), and patellar aseptic loosening (P = .737). The 10-year survivorship of the cementless metal-backed patella was 95.9% with all-cause failure as the endpoint. The 10-year survivorship of the cemented patellar component was 98.9%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated noninferiority of a 2nd generation HA-coated cementless metal-backed patellar implant in primary TKA compared to cemented patellae with 10-year survivorship of 95.9%. Advances in implant design and polyethylene wear properties have led to improved clinical results with metal-backed patellar components in primary TKA.

Selective Patella Resurfacing in Contemporary Cruciate Retaining and Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity.

METHODS

A total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135).

CONCLUSION

In contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Significantly Worse Fixation of Cemented Patellar Components on Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Femoral and Tibial Components: A Cause for Concern?

BACKGROUND

The etiology of anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. Few studies have examined patellar fixation quality. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the patellar cement-bone interface after TKA on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to correlate the patella fixation grade with the incidence of anterior knee pain.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 279 knees undergoing metal artifact reduction MRI for either anterior or generalized knee pain at least 6 months after cemented, posterior-stabilized TKA with patellar resurfacing with one implant manufacturer. MRI cement-bone interfaces and percent-integration of the patella, femur, and tibia were assessed by a fellowship-trained senior musculoskeletal radiologist. The grade and character of the patella interface were compared to the femur and tibia. Regression analyses were used to determine the association between patella integration with anterior knee pain.

RESULTS

There were more patellar components with ≥75% zones of fibrous tissue (50%) compared to the femur (18%) or tibia (5%) (P < .001). There were a greater number of patellar implants with poor cement integration (18%) compared to the femur (1%) or tibia (1%) (P < .001). MRI findings showed more evidence of patellar component loosening (8%) compared to the femur (1%) or tibia (1%) (P < .001). Anterior knee pain was correlated with worse patella cement integration (P = .01), with women predicted to have better integration (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The quality of the patellar cement-bone interface after TKA is worse compared to the femoral or tibial component interface. Poor patellar cement-bone interface may be a source of anterior knee pain after TKA, but further investigation is required.

Metal-Backed Patella Implants in Knee Arthroplasty: Can the Past Predict the Future?

BACKGROUND

There is a renewed interest in uncemented total knee arthroplasty to potentially provide longer durability, including the use of newer design metal-backed patellae (MBPs). The purpose of this study was to review survivorship with failure mode and time to failure of an earlier version MBP at up to 10-30 years of follow-up that may influence the desirability of using these components today.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients that had uncemented total knee arthroplasty with an uncemented MBP. All-cause revision rates were obtained from chart reviews and telephone discussions with patients and family members of deceased patients. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to determine the implant survivorship. Outcome scores were compared between revised and nonrevised patients.

RESULTS

The 97 knees that had an end point of an aseptic revision or last known contact with implant survivorship averaged 15 years (range, 0-32 years). There were 40 knees that underwent revision that included 37 patella component failures (38.1%). All patellar failures had polyethylene wear or fracture. None were revised due to loosening. Survivorship was 97.9% at 5 years, 88.7% at 10 years, and 53.0% at 20 years. Median time to failure was 11 years.

CONCLUSION

Loosening is not a failure mode with this MBP. There were 75% of the failures occurring after 10 years. Use of contemporary MBP with improved but still thin polyethylene warrants guarded optimism when used in younger patients where longer survivorship than with a cemented all-polyethylene patellar component is the goal.