Intra-Articular Osteotomy of the Distal Radius with the Use of Inexpensive In-House 3D Printed Surgical Guides and Arthroscopy: A Case Report

Intra-Articular Corrective Osteotomy for Distal Radial Intra-Articular Malunion Using Patient-Matched Instruments: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial

Background

Corrective osteotomy for intra-articular malunion is a challenging procedure. However, recent advancements, including patient-matched instruments created on the basis of preoperative computer simulation, enable accurate intra-articular correction. We hypothesized that intra-articular corrective osteotomy using patient-matched instruments for the treatment of distal radial intra-articular malunion would reduce intra-articular deformity and restore wrist function at 12 months of follow-up.

Methods

This prospective study included 12 patients with distal radial intra-articular malunion who underwent intra-articular corrective osteotomy external to the joint using patient-matched instruments. The primary end point was the maximum step-off on the articular surface of the distal radius, measured with use of computed tomography (CT), with an expected postoperative value of ≤1.5 mm. The secondary end points included the gap of the articular surface; range of motion; grip strength; pain evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS); patient satisfaction; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. A mean postoperative step-off of ≤1.5 mm for the primary end point was assessed with use of the 1-sample t test. The secondary end points were assessed with use of the Dunnett multiple comparison test.

Results

The average step-off significantly improved from 3.75 ± 1.04 mm preoperatively to 0.51 ± 0.40 mm at the 52-week postoperative follow-up and was maintained within 1.5 mm. The average wrist and forearm range of motion, VAS score, grip strength, DASH score, and PRWE score significantly improved. Eleven patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with their outcomes.

Conclusions

The use of patient-matched instruments could contribute to improving postoperative outcomes of intra-articular corrective osteotomy procedures involving the distal radius.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Role of Three-Dimensional Guides in Management of Forearm and Wrist Malunions

Although its precise added value and cost-effectiveness need to be determined, three-dimensional (3D) planning and intraoperative guidance facilitate restoration of normal anatomy. The use of 3D computer planning and patient-specific intraoperative guides leads to more accurate and reproducible correction of forearm and wrist malunion. Its value augments with increasing complexity of deformities. Combined deformities and complex intra-articular malunions of the forearm and wrist benefit the most from the use of 3D techniques. New technical developments, including lower-dose scanning technology, software improvement, artificial intelligence, and in-hospital printing, may lower the associated costs and make its application more accessible.

Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in Upper Extremity Surgery: A Systematic Review

Three-dimensional printing for medical applications in surgery of the upper extremity has gained in popularity as reflected by the increasing number of publications. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the clinical use of 3D printing in upper extremity surgery.

METHODS

We searched the databases PubMed and Web of Science for clinical studies that described clinical application of 3D printing for upper extremity surgery including trauma and malformations. We evaluated study characteristics, clinical entity, type of clinical application, concerned anatomical structures, reported outcomes, and evidence level.

RESULTS

We finally included 51 publications with a total of 355 patients, of which 12 were clinical studies (evidence level II/III) and 39 case series (evidence level IV/V). The types of clinical applications were for intraoperative templates (33% of a total of 51 studies), body implants (29%), preoperative planning (27%), prostheses (15%), and orthoses (1%). Over two third of studies were linked to trauma-related injuries (67%).

CONCLUSION

The clinical application of 3D printing in upper extremity surgery offers great potential for personalized approaches to aid in individualized perioperative management, improvement of function, and ultimately help to benefit certain aspects in the quality of life.