Cash-Based Stem-Cell Clinics: The Modern Day Snake Oil Salesman? A Report of Two Cases of Patients Harmed by Intra-articular Stem Cell Injections

Regulatory claims made by US businesses engaged in direct-to-consumer marketing of purported stem cell treatments and exosome therapies

Aim: This study investigated whether US businesses engaged in direct-to-consumer online marketing of purported stem cell therapies and stem cell-derived exosome products made claims concerning the regulatory status of these interventions. Methods: We used data mining and content analysis of company websites to examine regulatory-related representations made by US businesses marketing stem cell treatments and exosome therapies. Results: More than two thirds of such businesses did not make explicit representations about the regulatory status of their marketed products. Businesses that made claims about the regulatory status of the stem cell and exosome products they sold used range of representations concerning the legal standing of these interventions. Conclusion: The absence of information addressing the regulatory status of stem cell interventions and exosome products and the use of what appeared to be inaccurate information concerning the regulatory status of numerous products likely complicates efforts by customers to make informed health-related decisions.

Safety and efficacy claims made by US businesses marketing purported stem cell treatments and exosome therapies

Aim: Examining websites of US businesses engaged in direct-to-consumer advertising of putative stem cell treatments and exosome therapies, this study investigated the marketing claims such companies make about the purported safety and efficacy of these products. Methods: Data mining and content analysis of company websites were used to identify and analyze safety and efficacy claims. Results: Of the 978 businesses analyzed, less than half the companies made identifiable claims about the safety and efficacy of their advertised stem cell and exosome products. We also explored how companies framed the stem cell and exosome products they promoted. Representations ranged from assertions that such products are unproven and investigational to claims they constituted cures. Most advertising frames fell between these poles. Conclusion: Some businesses include in their marketing representations claims about the safety and efficacy of advertised products. Businesses that did not make such assertions use other techniques to attract prospective clients.

Evaluation of Patient Preference and Perception Regarding the Clinical Use of Autologous Versus Allogeneic Cell Therapy in Orthopedic Surgery

Background: Cell therapy has become a hot topic in orthopedics, with significant research dedicated to improving physicians' understanding of its efficacy. However, little is known about patients' cell therapy knowledge. Questions/Purposes: The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate patients' perceptions of cell therapy in orthopedics, (2) determine whether patients have a preference for autologous or allogeneic cell therapy, and (3) assess patient concerns about cell therapy. Methods: Consecutive outpatients of an orthopedic clinic were surveyed from June 2019 to January 2020. All patients were 18 years old or older and being seen for an orthopedic intervention, including rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, arthroscopic meniscectomy, or a cartilage repair procedure such as an osteochondral allograft transplantation or matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation. Results: A total of 50 patients were surveyed (mean age: 53 years). The patients' average rating for likelihood to use autologous cells was 8.86 ± 2.2 out of 10 and the average rating for likelihood to use allogeneic cells was 6.24 ± 3.3; 46% of patients had no specific concerns about autologous cell therapy, while 28% expressed concerns about efficacy, and 12% had concerns about donor age. The top 2 "main concerns" about allogeneic cell therapy were disease transmission (30%) and immune reaction (24%). Conclusions: This survey found that patients asserted a preference for autologous cell therapy in orthopedics. Further research is necessary to further elucidate the factors related to cell therapy that are most important to patients.

The Direct to Consumer Stem Cell Market and the Role of Primary Care Providers in Correcting Misinformation

INTRODUCTION

Direct to consumer stem cell and regenerative interventions (SCRIs) for various medical conditions have increased in popularity due to unmet medical needs and the promise of SCRIs to meet those needs. These interventions may have varying levels of safety and efficacy data and many lack sufficient scientific data to be marketed. The direct to consumer SCRI industry has received significant attention due to potential physical, economic, and emotional harms to patients. Patients may seek the counsel of their primary care providers when considering stem cell therapy for their condition.

METHODS

Here we describe strategies primary care providers can utilize when counseling patients.

RESULTS

Although we recommend constructing these discussions around individual patients' needs, one can utilize a general approach consisting of 4 parts. First, providers should recognize what information the patient is seeking and what is their understanding of stem cell and regenerative medicine. Next, providers should convey evidence-based information at the level of patients understanding so that they are aware of the risks, benefits, and descriptions of possible procedures. Throughout the conversations, attempts should be made to guide patients to a trusted resource that can provide additional information. Finally, providers should make an effort to address misinformation in a way that is nonjudgmental and patient-centered to make the patient feel safe and comfortable.

CONCLUSION

Effectively communicating risk information by primary care providers to patients is important given the harms reported from direct-to-consumer SCRIs. Correcting misinformation remains a priority when discussing SCRI's. Providers should strive to offer patients with additional resources such as the opportunity for consultation with a specialist or a consultation service dedicated to informing patients about regenerative medicine.

Colony Forming Potential and Protein Composition of Commercial Umbilical Cord Allograft Products in Comparison With Autologous Orthobiologics

BACKGROUND

Umbilical cord (UC) connective tissues contain plastic-adherent, colony forming unit-fibroblasts (CFU-Fs) amenable to culture expansion for potential therapeutic use. Recently, UC-derived allograft products have been made available to practitioners in orthopaedics and other specialties, by companies purporting "stem cell"-based healing. However, such marketing claims conflict with existing regulations for these human tissues, generating questions over the cellular and protein composition of current commercially available UC allograft products.

PURPOSE

To evaluate commercial UC allograft products for viable cells, CFU-Fs, and protein makeup.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Five commercial UC allograft products claiming to contain viable, undescribed "stem cells," 2 obtained from UC blood (UCB) and 3 from UC tissue (UCT), were analyzed. Image-based methods were used to measure cell concentration and viability, a traditional CFU-F assay was used to evaluate in vitro behavior indicative of a connective tissue progenitor cell phenotype often referred to as mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, and quantitative immunoassay arrays were used to measure a combination of cytokines and growth factors. Bone marrow concentrate (BMC) and plasma derived from the blood and bone marrow of middle-aged individuals served as comparative controls for cell culture and protein analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

Viable cells were identified within all 5 UC allograft products, with those derived from UCB having greater percentages of living cells (40%-59%) than those from UCT (1%-22%). Compared with autologous BMC (>95% viability and >300 million living cells), no CFU-Fs were observed within any UC allograft product (<15 million living cells). Moreover, a substantial number of proteins, particularly those within UCB allograft products, were undetectable or present at lower concentrations compared with blood and bone marrow plasma controls. Interestingly, several important growth factors and cytokines, including basic fibroblast growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, and osteoprotegerin, were most prevalent in 1 or more UCT allograft products as compared with blood and bone marrow plasma.

CONCLUSION

CFU-Fs, often referred to as stem cells, were not found within any of the commercial UC allograft products analyzed, and clinicians should remain wary of marketing claims stating otherwise.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Any therapeutic benefit of current UC allograft products in orthopaedic medicine is more likely to be attributed to their protein composition (UCT > UCB) or inclusion of cells without colony forming potential (UCB > UCT).

Complications Following Biologic Therapeutic Injections: A Multicenter Case Series

PURPOSE

To describe the complications that occur following biologic therapeutic injections.

METHODS

We queried physician members of the Biologic Association, a multidisciplinary organization dedicated to providing a unified voice for all matters related to musculoskeletal biologics and regenerative medicine. Patients included in this study must have (1) received a biologic injection, (2) sustained an adverse reaction, and (3) had a minimum of 1-year follow-up after the injection. Patient demographic information, medical comorbidities, diagnoses, and previous treatments were recorded. The type of injection, injection setting, injection manufacturers, and specific details about the complication and outcome were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 14 patients were identified across 6 institutions in the United States (mean age 63 years, range: 36-83 years). The most common injections in this series were intra-articular knee injections (50%), followed intra-articular shoulder injections (21.4%). The most common underlying diagnosis was osteoarthritis (78.5%). Types of injections included umbilical cord blood, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, placental tissue, and unspecified "stem cell" injections. Complications included infection (50%), suspected sterile inflammatory response (42.9%), and a combination of both (7.1%). The most common pathogen identified from infection cases was Escherichia coli (n = 4). All patients who had isolated infections underwent treatment with at least one subsequent surgical intervention (mean: 3.6, range: 1-12) and intravenous antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that serious complications can occur following treatment with biologic injections, including infections requiring multiple surgical procedures and inflammatory reactions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Stem cell therapy for heart failure: Medical breakthrough, or dead end?

Heart failure continues to be one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Myocardial infarction is the primary causative agent of chronic heart failure resulting in cardiomyocyte necrosis and the subsequent formation of fibrotic scar tissue. Current pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies focus on managing symptoms of heart failure yet remain unable to reverse the underlying pathology. Heart transplantation usually cannot be relied on, as there is a major discrepancy between the availability of donors and recipients. As a result, heart failure carries a poor prognosis and high mortality rate. As the heart lacks significant endogenous regeneration potential, novel therapeutic approaches have incorporated the use of stem cells as a vehicle to treat heart failure as they possess the ability to self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell lineages and tissues. This review will discuss past, present, and future clinical trials, factors that influence stem cell therapy outcomes as well as ethical and safety considerations. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown a wide spectrum of outcomes when applying stem cells to improve cardiac function. This may reflect the infancy of clinical trials and the limited knowledge on the optimal cell type, dosing, route of administration, patient parameters and other important variables that contribute to successful stem cell therapy. Nonetheless, the field of stem cell therapeutics continues to advance at an unprecedented pace. We remain cautiously optimistic that stem cells will play a role in heart failure management in years to come.