Effective osteoporosis education in the outpatient orthopaedic setting

Assessing osteoporosis awareness and knowledge levels of Turkish multiple sclerosis patients: an observational study

This study assessed osteoporosis knowledge and awareness among multiple sclerosis patients. The findings reveal a concerning lack of knowledge and awareness regarding osteoporosis, emphasizing the necessity for educational interventions to enhance early detection and mitigate complications within this particular patient group.

AIM

To assess the knowledge and awareness of osteoporosis in Turkish multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

MATERIAL-METHODS

Three hundred twenty-five patients were asked to fill out the osteoporosis awareness scale (OAS), which has a scoring range of 31-124, and the revised osteoporosis knowledge test (R-OKT), which has a score range of 0-32. Fall risk assessment for patients was conducted using the timed up-and-go test (high risk: > 30, moderate risk: 29-20, low risk: 14-19, and no risk: < 13 s).

RESULTS

An average score of 59.42 ± 19.63(31%) on the OAS and 14.99 ± 5.39 (47%) on the R-OKT was detected. No difference was found in R-OKT scores between genders, education levels, and patients with different fall risks and between genders and education levels in OAS scores. Patients with low, medium, and high fall risks exhibited higher OAS scores compared to those without any fall risk (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). No correlation was found between gender and education level with OAS and R-OKT scores and between the R-OKT scores and the risk of falls. There was a weak correlation between the OAS scores and an increased risk of falls (r = 0.269, p < 0.001). No differences between the age groups regarding OAS and R-OKT scores were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Turkish MS patients have inadequate knowledge and low awareness of OP compared to the healthy population. Urgent action is warranted to educate and support individuals with MS, implementing targeted interventions and awareness campaigns to improve early detection and prevent osteoporosis-related complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05760651.

Knowledge and awareness assessment of bone loss and fracture risk after spinal cord injury

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on a convenience sample of 138 adults with SCI, who completed a survey regarding knowledge and awareness of post-SCI bone health as part of a larger study. Self-reported demographic information and assessments of bone health knowledge were analyzed.

RESULTS

Approximately 20% (n = 28) of participants had never heard of bone mineral density (BMD), 25% (n = 34) only vaguely remembered that BMD was mentioned during their hospitalization/rehabilitation after SCI, 36% (n = 50) clearly remembered that BMD was mentioned during their hospitalization/rehabilitation, and 17% (n = 24) reported having an individual or group education session on causes and management of low BMD during rehabilitation. Only 30% (n = 42) of participants believed they had adequate knowledge on the subject, while 70% (n = 96) believed their knowledge was inadequate or were unsure. Most participants (73%, n = 101) reported being concerned about the risks of low BMD after SCI and were interested in learning more about prevention (76%, n = 105) and treatment options (78%, n = 108).

CONCLUSIONS

While results suggest that most participants received some information regarding bone health in post-SCI care, over 70% of participants reported wanting more information about bone loss prevention and treatment, indicating bone health education is a patient priority in this population.

The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest

Introduction:

With osteoporosis on the rise across the United States, the goal of this prospective study is to determine the effectiveness of our Midwest level-1 trauma center in diagnosing, treating, and educating osteoporosis patients after fracture with the use of questionnaires. Secondarily, we aimed to identify barriers that prevent our patients from complying with bone health recommendations.

Methods:

One hundred participants (≥55 years) were given 2 questionnaires (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and a study-specific questionnaire) that were administered during the patient’s visit to the orthopedic trauma clinic. A group of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis was compared to a group of patients not diagnosed with osteoporosis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24 (IBM Corp, Chicago, Illinois).

Results:

Patients who had been diagnosed with osteoporosis were significantly older (72.7 vs 66.5, P = .009) and more were women (86.2% vs 66.2%, P = .043). Significantly, fewer patients without the diagnosis of osteoporosis had a history of fragility fracture (56.3%) compared to 92.9% of those diagnosed with osteoporosis (P < .001). Of those with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) recommended by a healthcare provider, 20 (55.6%) of those without the diagnosis of osteoporosis and 13 (52%) of those with the diagnosis of osteoporosis had DXA screening before their fragility fracture (P = .499). More patients diagnosed with osteoporosis (93.1%) were taking calcium and vitamin D supplementation compared to 66.2% of those without the diagnosis of osteoporosis (P = .005). Only 37.9% of patients with the diagnosis of osteoporosis were receiving US Food and Drug Administration–approved medications for the management of their disease.

Discussion:

In patients without previous osteoporosis diagnosis, 59 (83.1%) of the 71 claimed that they did not receive any preventative education about osteoporosis, while 21 (72.4%) of the 29 patients with the diagnosis of osteoporosis claimed that they did not receive a preventative education (P = .165). Both groups lacked optimum diagnosis, treatment, and education of osteoporosis.

Conclusion:

Our study highlights the need for a deliberate effort of a multidisciplinary team to focus efforts in all stages of osteoporosis management.

Effects of a DXA result letter on satisfaction, quality of life, and osteoporosis knowledge: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Undiagnosed, or diagnosed and untreated osteoporosis (OP) increases the likelihood that falls result in hip fractures, decreased quality of life (QOL), and significant medical expenditures among older adults. We tested whether a tailored dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test result letter and an accompanying educational bone-health brochure affected patient satisfaction, QOL, or OP knowledge.

Methods

The Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study was a double-blinded, pragmatic, randomized trial which enrolled patients from 2012 to 2014. We randomized 7,749 patients presenting for DXA at three health care institutions in the United States who were ≥ 50 years old and able to understand English. Intervention patients received a tailored letter four weeks after DXA containing their results, 10-year fracture risk, and a bone-health educational brochure. Control patients received the results of their DXA per the usual practices of their providers and institutions. Satisfaction with bone health care, QOL, and OP knowledge were assessed at baseline and 12- and 52-weeks after DXA. Intention-to-treat analyses used multiple imputation for missing data and random effects regression models to adjust for clustering within providers and covariates.

Results

At 12-weeks 6,728 (86.8 %) and at 52-weeks 6,103 participants (78.8 %) completed their follow-up interviews. The intervention group was more satisfied with their bone health care compared to the usual care group at both their 12- and 52-week follow-ups (standardized effect size = 0.28 at 12-weeks and 0.17 at 52-weeks, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the intervention and usual care groups in QOL or OP knowledge at either time point.

Conclusions

A tailored DXA result letter and bone-health educational brochure sent to patients improved patient satisfaction with bone-related health care.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01507662 First received: December 8, 2011.

Evaluation of osteoporosis risk and initiation of a nurse practitioner intervention program in an orthopedic practice

The purpose of this study was to assess whether education and referral by a nurse practitioner could improve treatment adherence in patients with low bone mineral density in the orthopedic office. Our customized project did show some improvement but resistance to care continues in this unique population of patients.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis and osteopenia are significant clinical problems. Nearly 50% of adults over the age of 50 are osteopenic (Looker et al. in Osteoporos Int 22:541-549, 2011). Many patients with osteoporosis are not taking calcium or vitamin D, or any active treatment, even after dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and demonstration of low bone mineral density (Dell et al. in J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 6):79-86, 2009). One hypothesis to explain low adherence with osteoporosis treatment is lack of patient education. This study was designed to compare a control group with an education-intervention group (receiving patient education from a nurse practitioner) to determine any effect of education on treatment adherence.

METHODS

A total of 242 females and 105 males were studied as a control: a total of 292 females and 155 male were studied in the education group. Patients in the education group received educational materials and were counseled by a single nurse practitioner. Patients had a DXA performed and patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia were followed to assess treatment. At 12 months, patients received follow-up phone calls to determine patient use of calcium, vitamin D, and/or an active treatment. Results between the groups were compared.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients began calcium and vitamin D after education (p = 0.04); significantly more patients were taking or were recommended for an active treatment after education (p = 0.03). Thirty percent of patients either did not follow up or refused active treatment for osteoporosis. Approximately 50% of patients with osteoporosis were not taking an FDA-approved pharmacologic agent for osteoporosis treatment, despite education.

CONCLUSION

After patient education and referral to endocrinology, significantly more patients began calcium and vitamin D supplementation. However, up to 50% of patients with osteoporosis would not complete follow-up visits and/or did not adhere to treatment recommendations for osteoporosis.

Role of patient information handouts following operative treatment of ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Widespread evidence exists for directed patient information interventions (eg, pamphlets) in the setting of several orthopaedic conditions and interventions. Up until now, no study had assessed the role of these interventions in the management of patients following ankle fractures.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2007, 40 patients who suffered an operative ankle fracture were randomized to either a standard treatment group for an ankle fracture or an enhanced information group who received an American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons ankle fracture information pamphlet that explained postoperative routine at our institution and a physiotherapy handout depicting a standard protocol. Study participants were followed for 3 months clinically and radiographically. At the 6-week and 3-month intervals, study participants completed the Olerud-Molander Questionnaire and 2 questions regarding their level of satisfaction. The primary outcome measure was the Likert-scale-based survey question determining the level of satisfaction with the treating staff.

RESULTS

Participants in the enhanced information group were more satisfied with treatment at 3 months (9.2 vs 6.3; P < .001). There were significant improvements in work/activity ability at 6 weeks (P = .01), but this advantage disappeared at 3 months (P = .24). No differences in postoperative complication rates were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Information enhancement in the form of pamphlets can be helpful in providing patients with accessible information in the postoperative period. While they do not seem to have a sustained impact on postoperative outcomes, handouts may enhance the interaction between staff and patient at postoperative visits, improving patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, appropriately powered randomized prospective cohort study.

Active Referral Intervention following Fragility Fractures Leads to Enhanced Osteoporosis Follow-Up Care

At one major urban academic medical center, patients aged 50 years and older with fragility fractures were identified and scheduled or assisted in referral into osteoporosis medical management appointments. We evaluated the efficacy of an active intervention program at overcoming the logistical barriers and improving proper osteoporosis follow-up for persons who have sustained a fragility fracture. Of 681 patients treated for defined fractures, 168 were eligible and consented for the study of fragility fractures. Of those enrolled, 91 (54.2%) had appropriate osteoporosis follow-up on initial interview, and overall 120 (71.4%) had successful osteoporosis follow-up following our active intervention. Seventy patients (41.7%) were deemed to have no osteoporosis follow-up, and, of these, 48 were successfully referred to a scheduling coordinator. The scheduling coordinator was able to contact 37 (77%) patients to schedule proper follow-up, and, of these, 29 (78.4%) confirmed receiving an appropriate follow-up appointment. Active intervention and assisted scheduling for patients with recent fragility fractures improved the self-reported rate of osteoporosis follow-up from 54.2% to 71.4%.

Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients thirty years of age or younger

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than thirty years of age represents a long-term challenge. As polyethylene wear secondary to a high activity level could be problematic, hard-on-hard bearings have been proposed to reduce wear. The aim of this retrospective case series was to assess the clinical and radiographic results of primary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients thirty years of age or younger.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied thirty-four patients (forty-seven hips) who had undergone metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and analyzed the radiographic and clinical measurements after a mean duration of follow-up of 108 months (range, 62.4 to 153.6 months). The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was twenty-five years (range, fifteen to thirty years). The diameter of the head of the femoral component was 28 mm in all hips except five, in which it was 32 mm. The metal-on-metal bearing was the same in all patients.

RESULTS

The mean Merle d'Aubigné score increased from 10.6 (range, 1 to 14) to 17.1 (range, 12 to 18). No wear was found on the latest radiograph, but osteolysis was noted in three femora and two acetabula. Two revisions were performed, one because of impingement secondary to cup malorientation and the other because of acetabular loosening with osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis with revision of either component as the end point revealed a ten-year survival rate of 94.5% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 98.6%). The survival rate of the femoral stem was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

These encouraging intermediate-term results indicate that hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearing components may be a suitable solution for young and active patients with hip osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty

The main advantage of hip resurfacing is bone conservation for patients likely to outlive a primary conventional hip replacement. Previous attempts at hip resurfacing failed predominantly because of the consequences of a high amount of wear of thin polyethylene acetabular components and poor femoral component fixation. With correct patient selection, surgeon education, and operative technique, survivorship at five years is comparable with that of traditional hip replacements. Hip resurfacing has its own unique set of complications, including a fractured neck of the femur. It is necessary to understand the risk factors prior to performing the procedure.