The DUROM cup humeral surface replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Preoperative Comorbidities and Postoperative Complications Do Not Influence Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Humeral Head Resurfacing: Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of 106 Patients

Background

Humeral head resurfacing (HHR) has emerged as an alternative treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We investigated the outcomes of HHR using validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on 213 patients who underwent HHR. A PRO follow-up was performed by administering a questionnaire including the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score, Brophy activity survey, short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) survey, and general shoulder function. PRO scores were stratified by comorbidities and complications.

Results

Survey responses were received from 106 patients (51%), with a mean follow-up of 5.6 ± 1.8 years (range: 9 months to 6.1 years). Preoperative comorbidities were associated with significantly higher quickDASH scores. Postoperative complications were associated with significantly higher rates of current pain, higher visual analog scale scores, night pain, lower subjective shoulder values, and lower ASES pain and total scores. No differences in patient satisfaction were identified between the cohorts with and without preoperative comorbidities and between the cohorts with and without postoperative complications.

Conclusion

In our cross-sectional analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes following HHR, preoperative comorbidities, or postoperative complications had no impact on patient-perceived postoperative satisfaction or most PROs. HHR is clinically viable in a wide variety of patients. Future work is necessary to compare the efficacy of HHR compared with more traditional total shoulder arthroplasty and stemmed hemiarthroplasty regarding long-term outcomes and appropriate indications.

Radiological and functional 24-month outcomes of resurfacing versus stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing resurfacing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with those treated with a stemmed TSA.

METHODS

Patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent humeral resurfacing (RES) or stemmed (STA) TSA were identified in our shoulder arthroplasty register for retrospective analysis. Standard radiographs and clinical/patient-rated assessments were made up to 24 months post-surgery. Implant revisions were assessed. Patients were frequency-matched in a 1:1 (RES:STA) ratio based on gender and age, and compared with regard to operation time and shoulder function (Constant, SPADI and Quick DASH scores). Mixed models with statistical adjustments were applied.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2014, 44 RES and 137 STA operations were performed in 157 patients; one and two revisions were recorded in the RES and STA group, respectively. The final matched cohort included a total of 69 patients and 37 operations per treatment group. Resurfacing TSA was 17 min shorter (95%CI: 5-28) compared to the stemmed procedure (p = 0.005). RES and STA patients showed significant functional improvement six months post-implantation, yet all measured scores did not differ between the groups at 2 years (p ≥ 0.131). The status of static centering of the humeral head, acromiohumeral distance, and a lack of signs of implant loosening were also similar between treatments.

CONCLUSION

Similar 24-month post-operative radiological and functional outcome is achieved by RES and STA patients, even with a shorter RES surgery time. Larger cohorts and longer follow-up are required to better assess implant survival.

Radiostereographic analysis of a shoulder surface replacement: does hydroxyapatite have a place?

Resurfacing of the humeral head is commonly used within the UK to treat osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder. We present the results of a small prospective randomised study of this procedure using the Global CAP prosthesis with two different coatings, Porocoat and DuoFix hydroxyapatite (HA). We followed two groups of ten patients with OA of the shoulder for two years after insertion of the prosthesis with tantalum marker beads, recording pain, Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) outcome scores, and using radiostereometric analysis to assess migration. The outcomes were similar to those of other series, with significant reductions in pain (p = 0.003) and an improvement in the Constant (p = 0.001) and ASES scores (p = 0.006). The mean migration of the prosthesis three months post-operatively was 0.78 mm (0.51 to 1.69) and 0.72 mm (0.33 to 1.45) for the Porocoat and DuoFix groups, respectively. Analysis of variance indicated that the rate of migration reached a plateau after three months post-operatively in both groups. At follow-up of two years the mean migration was 1 mm (sd 1 (0.25 to 3.32)); in the Porocoat group and 0.8 mm (sd 0.4 (0.27 to 1.45)) in the DuoFix HA group. Significant migration of the prosthesis was seen in one patient who had received an anterior humeral bone graft. This prosthesis was later revised after 2.7 years. The addition of a coating of HA to the sintered surface does not improve fixation of this prosthesis.

Shoulder arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: 303 consecutive cases with minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

This is an update on a previously documented cohort of patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis, with a minimum 5-year clinical follow-up.

METHODS

The survivorship of 303 consecutive shoulder arthroplasties (108 hemiarthroplasties, 195 total shoulder arthroplasties) for rheumatoid arthritis at one institution was assessed. There were 255 arthroplasties in the clinical analysis and 188 in the radiographic analysis.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survivorship free of revision at 5 years and 10 years was 96.1% and 92.9% for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and 89.2% and 87.9% for hemiarthroplasty (HA). The most common indications were glenoid loosening (5%) and infection (2%) for TSA revision and glenoid arthrosis (7%) for HA revision. Pain relief was greater with TSA than with HA. In patients with an intact rotator cuff, in comparing TSA with HA, those with a TSA had greater improvements in pain scores (-2.7 vs. -1.8 on a 5-point scale) and degrees of elevation (45 versus 24) (P = .08). Approximately 30% of humeral components and 73% of glenoid components had periprosthetic lucencies. There was a shift in position of the glenoid in 33% of TSAs, and 36% were "at risk." Eighty-one percent of HAs had moderate or severe glenoid erosion.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Both HA and TSA provide pain relief and improved motion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In patients with an intact rotator cuff, pain relief and range of motion are more improved with TSA compared with HA. There is a high rate of component lucency, but component revision is uncommon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series, treatment study.

Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Humeral resurfacing has shown promising results for osteoarthritis, but revisions for glenoid erosion have been reported frequently. We investigated the hypothesis that preoperative glenoid wear and postoperative progress of glenoid erosion would influence the clinical outcome.

METHODS

We reviewed 61 resurfacing hemiarthroplasties (55 patients) for primary osteoarthritis. 6 patients were lost to follow-up and 5 had undergone revision arthroplasty. This left 50 shoulders in 44 patients (mean age 66 years) that were followed for mean 30 (12-44) months. Complications, revisions, and the age- and sex-related Constant score were assessed. Radiographs were evaluated for loosening and glenoid erosion according to Walch.

RESULTS

Of the 50 shoulders that were functionally assessed, the average age- and sex-related Constant score was 73%. In patients with preoperative type-B2 glenoids, at 49% it was lower than in type-A1 glenoids (81%, p = 0.03) and in type-B1 glenoids (84%, p = 0.02). The average age- and sex-related Constant score for patients with type-A2 glenoids (60%) was lower than for type-A1 and -B1 glenoids and higher than for type-B2 glenoids, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the total population of 61 shoulders, the radiographs showed postoperative glenoid erosion in 38 cases and no humeral prosthetic loosening. Revision arthroplasty was performed in 11 cases after 28 (7-69) months. The implant size had no statistically significant influence on the functional outcome. The size was considered to be adequate in 28 of the 50 functionally assessed shoulders. In 21 cases, the implant size was too large and in 1 case it was too small.

INTERPRETATION

We found frequent postoperative glenoid erosion and a high rate of revision arthroplasty after humeral resurfacing for primary osteoarthritis. Oversizing of the implants was common, but it had no statistically significant influence on the functional outcome. Inferior results were found in the presence of increased eccentric preoperative glenoid wear. Total shoulder arthroplasty should be considered in these patients.

Aequalis humeral head resurfacing in glenohumeral arthritis at a minimum followup of 2 years

Aim. To evaluate results of Aequalis humeral head resurfacing in patients with end-stage glenohumeral arthritis at a minimum followup of two years. Patients and Methods. Twenty-one consecutive patients underwent humeral head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty between 2007 and 2009. Three patients did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. 18 patients with mean age of 75.1 years (range 58-91 years) and a mean duration of preoperative symptoms of 33.6 months (range 6-120 months) were analyzed. Patients' self-reported Oxford shoulder score (OSS) was collected prospectively and was used as an assessment tool to measure final outcome. Results. The mean initial OSS was 15 (range 3-29). The score improved by an average of 19.5 points at a mean followup of 36.3 months (range 24-54 months) to reach a mean final OSS of 34.5 (range 6-47). The improvement of OSS was highly significant with a two-tailed P value less than 0.0001. The overall patient satisfaction was 94%. Conclusion. This study demonstrates Aequalis shoulder resurfacing hemiarthroplasty as a reliable procedure, away from its originating center, for improvement of shoulder function as shown by the patients' self-reported outcome score (OSS) in end-stage glenohumeral arthritis at a minimum followup of 2 years.

Resurfacing humeral prosthesis: do we really reconstruct the anatomy?

BACKGROUND

The goal of a resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce the individual's anatomy while preserving the bone stock of the humeral head. This study investigated the hypothesis that resurfacing the humeral prosthesis restores normal glenohumeral relationships and correlates with the final clinical results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A resurfacing shoulder implant was performed in 61 patients (64 shoulders). Indications were primary osteoarthritis in 26, secondary osteoarthritis in 21, avascular necrosis in 4, rheumatoid arthritis in 4, dysplasia in 4, and for others indications in 5.

RESULTS

At an average of 36 months (range, 24-65) of follow-up , the Constant score reached 68 points and the Quick-Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score reached 28 points. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic analysis showed a decrease of the humeral head diameter (51 ± 5 vs 48 ± 5 mm) and of the height of the humeral head (21 ± 4 vs 19 ± 2 mm), without modification of the radius of curvature or the height of the center of rotation. The medial humeral offset increased from 3.3 ± 3.5 to 6.4 ± 3 mm and the lateral offset from 6.8 ± 9 to 10.4 ± 9 mm. The implant was mainly in varus postoperatively compared with preoperative values (122° ± 11° vs 134° ± 7°). Postoperative radiographic analysis and at the last follow-up did not show any significant difference, except for the increase of the depth of the glenoid from 4.2 ± 1.4 to 4.9 ± 1.8 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty reproduces the normal anatomy and compensates glenohumeral wear. However, there was a tendency to position the prosthesis in varus because of technical imperfections. With follow-up, medialization of the humerus with glenoid wear was observed and was correlated in some patients with reappearance of pain.

Treatment of severe cuff tear arthropathy with the humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty: two-year minimum follow-up

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of a humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty implanted toward valgus for patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We monitored 24 patients with CTA who underwent resurfacing arthroplasty. Patients were assessed with use of the Constant score and a subjective satisfaction score. The rotator cuff was evaluated preoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging. The Sirveaux classification of glenoid erosion in glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff was used to grade the preoperative status of the glenoid.

RESULTS

The mean absolute Constant score for the entire cohort improved from 21 points (range, 7-44 points) to 63 points (range, 23-89 points) at a mean of 38 months (range, 24-56 months). Patients with an intact or moderately atrophied teres minor muscle (n = 16) showed a significantly better Constant score (P = .011) and greater active external rotation (P = .034) than patients with severe atrophy. Neither the type of glenoid erosion according to Sirveaux nor the inclination angle of the implant has an effect on the clinical or functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

For selected patients with CTA, resurfacing arthroplasty of the humeral head provides satisfactory medium-term outcomes. The teres minor muscle is necessary for maintaining or establishing external rotation. In patients with massive limitation of motion and total absence of the subscapularis tendon, the implantation of a humeral surface replacement should be seriously considered.

Early results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis affecting the shoulder is typically associated with rotator cuff compromise and can also result in severe glenoid erosion. Since reverse shoulder arthroplasty is capable of addressing both rotator cuff disorders and glenoid bone deficiencies, our aim was to evaluate the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and either or both of these associated conditions.

METHODS

We performed eighteen primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties in sixteen patients with rheumatoid arthritis involving the shoulder as well as associated rotator cuff compromise and/or severe erosion of the glenoid bone between 2002 and 2007. Patients were assessed with use of the Constant score, patient satisfaction score, subjective shoulder value, range of shoulder motion, and imaging studies.

RESULTS

The mean Constant score improved from 22.5 to 64.9 points at a mean of 3.8 years (range, 2.1 to 7.0 years) postoperatively. The patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome of the surgery in seventeen of the eighteen shoulders. The mean subjective shoulder value was 68.6% postoperatively. Active forward elevation improved from 77.5° to 138.6°, and external rotation with the arm in 90° of abduction improved from 16.9° to 46.1°. The mean Constant score improved from 28.0 points to 74.3 points in shoulders in which the teres minor muscle was normal before the surgery, and it improved from 20.8 to 54.6 points in shoulders with an atrophic teres minor muscle. Scapular notching was observed in ten of the eighteen shoulders. A fracture involving the acromion, acromial spine, coracoid, or greater tuberosity was observed either intraoperatively or postoperatively in four of the eighteen shoulders. One case of transient axillary nerve injury was noted. There were no cases of dislocation, infection, or component loosening. None of the patients required revision surgery for any reason.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparatively good outcomes were observed in the short to intermediate term after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, surgeons should be aware of the risk of intraoperative and postoperative fractures in this patient group.

Cemented humeral surface replacement for a locked posterior fracture-dislocation: a case report

Posterior fracture-dislocations of the shoulder are uncommon and challenging lesions. We present the case of a 76-year-old male patient who sustained a locked posterior humeral head fracture-dislocation during a convulsion. Because more than 40% of the articular surface was involved, preserving the head was not possible. We treated the fracture with a cemented humeral surface replacement. The patient demonstrated good shoulder function and no instability on short-term follow-up. Surface replacement may be a valuable treatment option for fracture-dislocations of the shoulder with articular surface involvement.

Long-term results and patient satisfaction after shoulder resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Shoulder resurfacing has regained popularity in recent years. This report presents the long-term (>20 years) results of this procedure with regard to patient satisfaction and implant survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We followed up 61 patients who underwent shoulder resurfacing procedures (74 shoulders) for a minimum of 20 years or until death (7 additional patients were lost to follow-up). The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 58 years. There were 41 total resurfacing procedures and 33 hemi-resurfacing procedures. The humeral component consisted of a cup with a short central peg that was placed either with or without cement. The glenoid was resurfaced with a cemented polyethylene or polyurethane component.

RESULTS

Patient satisfaction was 95%, and the survivorship of the humeral prostheses was 96%. There were no periprosthetic fractures, dislocations, or infections. Two humeral components were revised to stemmed prostheses (one for loosening and one for unexplained pain), and one was revised from a cementless to a cemented resurfacing prosthesis. Twelve cemented polyethylene glenoid prostheses had radiolucencies, but only three produced symptoms requiring revision surgery; three polyurethane glenoid prostheses showed severe wear radiographically, but none was loose or required revision surgery. There were 7 revision procedures, 6 with good results.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder resurfacing is a successful procedure for the majority of patients, with high rates of patient satisfaction, long-term survivorship of the humeral prosthesis, and few complications.

[Shoulder arthroplasty for primary synovial diseases]

Shoulder arthroplasty has become an essential component of the standard surgical repertoire for the treatment of severe primary and secondary glenohumeral arthritis and has been shown to provide reliable long-term pain relief with satisfactory functional results. In most cases, in particular in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the indications for arthroplasty are primarily based on pain, which often includes severe pain at rest. Despite poor bone stock and impaired soft tissue quality in RA which frequently results in massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears, shoulder arthroplasty has been shown to be an effective means of improving shoulder function. Several different types of prostheses are now available for different indications determined by age, functional demand, etiology and structural deficits. For optimal outcome, the most suitable type of prosthesis needs to be selected by an experienced shoulder surgeon who is familiar with the entire spectrum of treatment options.

Humeral surface replacement for the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus

Fractures of the proximal humerus can lead to malalignment of the humeral head, necrosis and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. In such cases surface replacement might be a promising option. A total of 28 shoulders with glenohumeral arthritis subsequent to a fracture underwent surface replacement arthroplasty of the humeral head in patients with a mean age of 60 years (35 to 83). On the basis of the inclination of the impacted head, post-traumatic arthritis was divided into three types: type 1, an impacted fracture of the head in an anatomical position (seven cases); type 2, a valgus impacted fracture (13 cases); type 3, a varus impacted fracture (eight cases). The outcome was measured by means of the Constant score. According to the Boileau classification of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus, all 28 patients had a final result of intra-capsular category 1. The mean Constant score for the 28 shoulders increased from 23.2 points (2 to 45) pre-operatively to 55.1 points (20 to 89) at a mean of 31 months (24 to 66) post-operatively. Valgus impacted fractures had significantly better results (p < 0.039). Surface replacement arthroplasty can provide good results for patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Their use avoids post-operative complications of the humeral shaft, such as peri-prosthetic fractures. Further surgery can be undertaken more easily as the bone stock is preserved.

Beneficial and harmful effects of shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a Cochrane review

OBJECTIVE

To assess beneficial and harmful effects of arthroplasty in the shoulder joint in patients with RA.

METHODS

A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials and case series (included for assessment of complications) published between 1995 and 2008. Articles considered potentially relevant were retrieved in full text and assessed independently by two authors. Risk of bias and level of evidence were assessed according to the established criteria.

RESULTS

One RCT (26 shoulders) compared cemented and uncemented humeral stem fixation during arthroplasty, reporting no significant differences between groups at 2-year follow-up (low-quality evidence). Nineteen case series (1155 shoulders) reported component loosening requiring revision at 5%, infections at 2% and minor complications at 7% (very low-quality evidence). The retrospective case series had several limitations related to methodological quality and standards of reporting.

CONCLUSION

At present, there is very little research evidence supporting decisions about shoulder joint arthroplasty in patients with RA.

Surgical interventions for the rheumatoid shoulder

BACKGROUND

Involvment of the shoulder joint in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) leads to severe destruction of the glenohumeral joint. When conservative treatment does not result in sufficient improvement, surgical procedures may be considered as the only beneficial treatment option.

OBJECTIVES

To assess beneficial and harmful effects of all forms of surgical treatment in the management of the shoulder in people with rheumatoid arthritis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Articles were identified by searches in The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCISEARCH and reference lists of relevant articles (January 1995 to May 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised Controlled Trials, and Controlled Clinical Trials reporting on effects of shoulder surgery. In addition case-series were included for the assessment of complications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

One RCT, one CCT and 21 case-series were included. The RCT compared cemented versus uncemented humeral stem fixation in arthroplasty and found no significant differences between the two groups after two years (low quality evidence). The CCT compared rotator cuff repair with augmented subscapularis transposition versus subscapularis transposition alone and reported significant differences in favour of the augmented subscapularis transposition after 2 years in function, mean difference (MD) 4.00 on a 0 to 30 scale (95% CI 1.11 to 6.89) and pain, MD 4.00 on a 0 to 20 scale (95% CI 0.84 to 7.16) (low quality evidence). Based on 11 case series (mean follow up 4.5 to 12 years) complications were reported in 11% (95% CI: 9.9% to 12.1%) of the total shoulder arthroplasties, while 10 case-series (mean follow-up 2.7 to 11.3 years) reported complications in 9.9% (95% CI: 8.4% to 11.4%) of the hemiarthroplasties (very low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of surgical treatment in the management of the shoulder in people with rheumatoid arthritis are largely unknown due to the paucity of randomised controlled trials.

Shoulder resurfacing

Resurfacing is a type of shoulder arthroplasty that involves replacing the humeral joint surface with a metal covering, or cap, thus preserving the bone of the proximal part of the humerus. If the glenoid is also replaced, a current conventional polyethylene glenoid replacement prosthesis or an interposed soft-tissue graft is used. The potential advantages of humeral resurfacing, as compared with conventional shoulder arthroplasty, are: (1) no osteotomy is performed (and thus the head-shaft angle does not have to be addressed); (2) minimal bone resection; (3) a short operative time; (4) a low prevalence of humeral periprosthetic fractures; and (5) ease of revision to a conventional total shoulder replacement, if needed. Outcomes of surface replacement arthroplasty have been comparable with those of arthroplasties with a stemmed prosthesis in numerous short and mid-term follow-up studies. Future studies are required to assess the long-term outcomes of humeral resurfacing and to evaluate alternative surface bearing materials, especially on the glenoid side. Resurfacing appears to be a viable option for shoulder replacement, especially in young patients.