Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty

Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years of Age and Younger: A 20-year Follow-Up Analysis

BACKGROUND

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been an excellent bearing for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to improved wear characteristics compared to conventional materials. Patients 50 years of age or younger are at high risk for wear-related complications of their THA, and few studies have followed these patients who have HXPLE into the third decade.

METHODS

In a retrospective review of 88 consecutive THAs performed in 77 patients aged 50 years and younger (mean 41; range, 20 to 50), in which HXLPE was utilized, they were evaluated for their clinical and radiographic results at an average of 20-year follow-up (range, 18 to 24). The current study reports on longer-term follow-up from our previously published series at shorter follow-up times. Patients were categorized by femoral head material: cobalt chrome (n = 14), ceramic (n = 30), and oxidized zirconium (n = 22) and by femoral head size: 26 mm (n = 12), 28 mm (n = 46), and 32 mm (n = 8). Harris Hip Scores were collected preoperatively and at the most recent follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated for linear and volumetric wear, radiolucent lines, and osteolysis.

RESULTS

Mean Harris Hip Scores improved from 47.1 (standard deviation [SD] 8.8) preoperatively to 92.0 (SD 7.7) (P < .0001) at 20-year follow-up. There was one hip that was revised for recurrent instability, and no hip demonstrated radiographic evidence of loosening or osteolysis. The mean polyethylene linear wear rate was 0.017 (SD 0.012) mm/y, and the mean polyethylene volumetric wear rate was 3.15 (SD 2.8) mm3/year, with no significant differences based on articulation type or head size.

CONCLUSIONS

Total hip arthroplasty with HXLPE in patients ≤ 50 years of age continues to demonstrate excellent long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with low wear characteristics at 20-year follow-up, regardless of femoral head material or size.

Updating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), a condition characterized by the presence of a necrotic bone lesion in the femoral head, is caused by a disruption in the blood supply. Its occurrence is more common in young and middle-aged adults and it is the main reason for performance of total hip arthroplasty in this age group. Its incidence is increasing along with increased use of glucocorticoids for management of adjuvant therapy for treatment of leukemia as well as organ transplantation and other myelogenous diseases. Current information on etiology and pathogenesis, as well as natural history, stage system, and treatments is provided in this review. A description of the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) criteria for classification of glucocorticoids- and alcohol-associated ONFH, 2019 ARCO staging system, and 2021 ARCO classification using computed tomography for the early stages of ONFH is also provided.

Ten to 13-Year Results of Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 30 Years Old

BACKGROUND

We previously reported mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in 72 patients (86 hips) who were <30 years old. Noise was noted in 8 (9.3%) of the hips, no osteolysis or loosening was detected, and no patient required reoperation. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and survivorship at >10 years after THA using Delta CoC bearings in patients who were <30 years old.

METHODS

Cementless THA with a Delta CoC bearing was performed between March 2008 and January 2012 in 91 hips of 76 patients who were <30 years old. Eighty-five hips in 71 patients (44 men and 27 women) with a mean age of 25.9 years (range, 16 to 29 years) at surgery were followed for a mean of 10.9 years (range, 10 to 13 years).

RESULTS

No ceramic bearings fractured. The incidence of squeaking increased to 5.9% (5 of 85), but the squeaking was not reproducible within individual patients. Periprosthetic osteolysis developed in 3 hips (3 patients): around the stem in 2 and around the metal shell in 1. The stem in 1 hip underwent revision because of a Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture. One patient with systemic lupus erythematosus underwent irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Survivorship free of reoperation for any reason was 92.4% (95% confidence interval, 82.4% to 100%) at 13 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term results and survivorship of Delta CoC THA in patients <30 years old were favorable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A 10- to 12-year follow-up study of delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We previously reported five-to-seven-year results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of delta ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing. We conducted an extension study with a CT scan at a minimum of 10 years after surgery.

METHODS

From March 2009 to March 2011, 273 patients (310 hips) received cementless THA with delta CoC bearing, porous-coated cup and hydroxyapatite-coated stem. In this extended study, 252 patients (144 men and 108 women) (288 hips) with a mean age of 49.7 years (16-83) at surgery were followed for a mean of 10.4 years (10-12) with CT scans in 133 hips (46.2%, 133/288). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were made at each follow-up and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with revision and reoperation as endpoints.

RESULTS

There were no more ceramic fractures. Compared to mid-term results, the incidence of squeaking and RLLs increased to 3.1% (9/288) and 19.4% (56/288), respectively. The RLL progressed to focal osteolysis in 3 hips (5.4%, 3/56). No hip had detectable wear or prosthetic loosening. Two hips were reoperated due to periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic femoral fracture in each. The survivorship decreased to 98.3% (96.7-99.9%) at 12 years.

CONCLUSION

During the extended follow-up, no additional ceramic fracture occurred, and the incidence of squeak increased by 0.7%. The long-term survivorship of Delta CoC THA was encouraging. However, focal osteolysis occurred around the hydroxyapatite-coated stem in 1% (3/288).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (Prospective cohort study).

Long-term survivorship of an exchangeable-neck hip prosthesis with a Ti-alloy/Ti-alloy neck-stem junction

INTRODUCTION

Breakage of exchangeable-neck (EN) and adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) to neck-stem junction (NSJ) damage products are responsible for increasing the revision rate of EN hip prostheses. We investigated the survivorship of an EN hip prosthesis including a NSJ with both components made of titanium alloy (Ti-alloy/Ti-alloy) to assess whether, and to what extent, EN breakage and NSJ damage affected implant survivorship.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from a hip replacement registry, we determined survivorship of 2857 EN prostheses. Long-offset configurations of head and EN were implanted in heavy (> 90 kg) patients only in 23 hips. We investigated under which conditions EN breakages or ALTRs occurred. We also measured titanium (Ti) and vanadium (V) blood concentrations in 24 patients with a unilateral well-working prosthesis.

RESULTS

The 17-year survival rates for any reason and aseptic loosening of any component were 88.9% (95%CI 87.5-90.1; 857 hips at risk) and 96.9% (95%CI 96.0-97.6), respectively. There were two cases of EN breakage and one case of ALTR (metallosis), due to rim-neck impingement, out of 276 revisions. After an average period of 9.8 years (range 7.8-12.8 years), the maximum Ti and V blood concentrations in patients with a well-working prosthesis were 5.0 µg/l and 0.16 µg/l, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present incidence of EN breakage or ALTR is lower than those reported in other studies evaluating EN hip prosthesis survivorship. This study suggests that (i) the risk of EN breakage is reduced by limiting the use of long-offset configurations in heavy patients and (ii) Ti-alloy/Ti-alloy NSJ damage products do not promote ALTR nor significantly alter the rate of implant loosening. Since design decisions and implant configuration determine the NSJ strength, the NSJ strength in working conditions must be thoroughly investigated to proper define the clinical indications for any EN design.

Third and fourth generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years

BACKGROUND

Ceramic on Ceramic bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) afford a low friction coefficient, low wear rates and extreme hardness. Significant complications include hip squeak, ceramic fracture and poor polyethylene performance in revision procedures due to imbedding of abrasive microscopic ceramic fragments. We report on the results of this bearing at a minimum of 10 years.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective review of 449 THAs was performed. Primary outcome measures included aseptic revision and all-cause revision rates at a minimum of 10 years post operatively. Evaluation of functionality was performed with WOMAC and SF-36 scores which were performed pre-operatively and at intervals of 6 months, one year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years post operatively.

RESULTS

There was a 6.2% (n = 28) all-cause and 5.3% (n = 24) aseptic revision rate for ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty at minimum of 10 years with a mean time to revision 4.8 years (range 2 months-11.6 years). Notably, there were 2 revisions for ceramic head fracture, one for ceramic liner fracture, 3 for aseptic loosening and 3 revisions for squeaking. Pain of unknown origin was the most common reason for revision. There was an improvement in postoperative WOMAC scores from a mean of 59.8 (range 15-95) pre-operatively to a mean of 15.6 (range 0-78) at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

This study showed good functional outcomes but high revision rates for CoC THA at a minimum of 10 years. Our rates of ceramic fracture were consistent with other studies.

Effect of Operation Room Nursing Intervention and Ceramic Prosthesis on Total Hip Arthroplasty

In order to solve the problems of large trauma, many postoperative complications, and complex operation of artificial hip arthroplasty, a method to analyze the application effect of operating room nursing intervention in artificial hip arthroplasty was proposed. Firstly, 120 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty in our hospital from January to December 2017 were selected; Secondly, they were randomly divided into routine group (60 cases) and intervention group (60 cases); finally, on this basis, the intervention group strengthened the nursing in the operating room and used nanoceramic prosthesis. The Harris score of hip joint, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the satisfaction with nursing services were compared between the two groups. The results showed that the Harris score of hip joint and the satisfaction score of nursing service in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the routine group (P < 0.05); the incidence of postoperative complications in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the routine group (P < 0.05). It is proved that actively carrying out nursing intervention in the operating room and using nanoceramic prosthesis can not only improve the clinical efficacy and nursing service satisfaction of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty but also reduce the incidence of complications.

A case-driven hypothesis for multi-stage crack growth mechanism in fourth-generation ceramic head fracture

BACKGROUND

Ceramic bearings are used in total hip arthroplasty due to their excellent wear behaviour and biocompatibility. The major concern related to their use is material brittleness, which significantly impacts on the risk of fracture of ceramic components. Fracture toughness improvement has contributed to the decrease in fracture rate, at least of the prosthetic head. However, the root cause behind these rare events is not fully understood. This study evaluated head fracture occurrence in a sizeable cohort of patients with fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic implants and described the circumstances reported by patients in the rare cases of head fracture.

METHODS

The clinical survivorship of 29,495 hip prostheses, with fourth-generation ceramic bearings, was determined using data from a joint replacement registry. The average follow-up period was 5.2 years (range 0.1-15.6). Retrieval analysis was performed in one case for which the ceramic components were available.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes confirmed the extremely low fracture rate of fourth-generation ceramic heads: only two out of 29,495 heads fractured. The two fractures, both involving 36 mm heads, occurred without a concurrent or previous remarkable trauma. Considering the feature of the fractured head, a multi-stage crack growth mechanism has been hypothesized to occur following damage at the head-neck taper interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons must continue to pay attention to the assembly of the femoral head: achieving a proper head seating on a clean taper is a prerequisite to decrease the risk of occurrence of any damage process within head-neck junction, which may cause high stress concentration at the contact surface, promoting crack nucleation and propagation even in toughened ceramics.

Third-Generation Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A 10- to 16-year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

Long-term follow-up results of ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasty (THA), specifically, in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) are unknown. We evaluated (1) clinical results and radiological outcomes, (2) ceramic-related complications: noise and ceramic fracture, (3) osteolysis, and (4) survivorship after alumina COC THA in ONFH patients with longer than 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

From May 2003 to June 2009, 325 ONFH patients (403 hips) underwent primary THAs at our department. Among them, 231 patients (293 THAs) were followed for 10 to 16 (mean, 12.9) years. There were 148 men and 83 women, their mean age at the time of THA was 47.2 years, and their mean body index was 24.0 kg/m2. The postoperative CT scans were done in 160 hips.

RESULTS

Grinding sensation or squeak was noted in 6.8% (20/293), ceramic head fracture occurred in 2.4% (7/293) and acetabular osteolysis developed in 0.7% (2/293). All 7 ceramic fractures occurred in 28-mm short-neck heads. There was no detectable wear or prosthetic loosening, and the 16-year survivorship was 96.0% (95% confidence interval; 93.8% to 98.2%). The mean Harris hip score was 91.7 (range, 84 to 100) points at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10- to 16-year results of alumina COC THAs were encouraging with an excellent survivorship. However, ceramic fracture and noise still remain matters of concern. We recommend not to use 28-mm short-neck ceramic head to avoid ceramic head fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

High Risk of Neck-liner Impingement and Notching Observed with Thick Femoral Neck Implants in Ceramic-on-ceramic THA

BACKGROUND

Recently, impingement between the femoral stem and ceramic liner, which appears as a notch in the stem neck on radiographs, has emerged as a new complication. However, the proportion of impingement, potential risk factors, and related complications are poorly elucidated.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

In patients who underwent ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THA and had at least 10 years of follow-up, we asked: (1) What proportion had radiographic evidence of stem neck-ceramic liner impingement (notching of the stem), and what implant design, implantation factors, or complications such as ceramic fracture or metallosis are associated with impingement? (2) How common are the complications of noise and ceramic fracture? (3) What are the radiologic changes (including fixation of femoral and acetabular components, osteolysis, and heterotopic ossification) and clinical outcomes as determined by the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) for this cohort? (4) What is the survivorship with implant revision as the endpoint and with reoperation for any reason as the endpoint after CoC THA using a thick-neck stem design?

METHODS

Between May 2003 and April 2010, 643 patients underwent primary THA at a tertiary referral hospital. After excluding patients with metal-on-polyethylene and with ceramic-on-polyethylene implants, 621 patients were considered eligible for this study. All patients received the same hemispherical titanium cup, a standard-length tapered titanium stem, and a CoC bearing. Of those, 19% (115) were lost to follow-up before 10 years, and 8% (50) were excluded because they died before the minimum follow-up duration of 10 years, leaving 73% (456) for analysis. Patients had a mean age of 50 ± 14 years and were followed for a median (range) of 13 years (10 to 17). The mean cup abduction was 38° ± 5°, and the mean cup anteversion was 26° ± 7°. To determine the proportion of patients with the neck-liner impingement, we analyzed the plain radiographs of every patient during follow-up to detect notches around the stem. The detection of stem neck notches on the radiographs was reliable (intraobserver reliability: κ = 0.963; p < 0.001 and interobserver reliability: κ = 0.975; p < 0.001). To evaluate factors related to notching, we compared the possible confounding factors including gender, age, BMI, implant position, neck length, and head diameter. Complications such as ceramic fracture, noise, dislocation, and periprosthetic joint infection were recorded. Noise was evaluated via interview and with the Hip Noise Assessment Questionnaire, which assessed the noise qualitatively. For clinical outcome, we assessed the mHHS, which includes pain and function scales (0 [worst] to 100 [best]), every visit. Tilting of at least 4° or migration of at least 4 mm was the criteria for cup loosening; subsidence more than 3 mm, any change in position, or a continuous radiolucent line greater than 2 mm was the criteria for stem loosening. To evaluate osteolysis, we performed CT scans in 57% (262 of 456) of patients. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using the endpoints of survivorship free from implant revision and survivorship free from reoperation for any cause.

RESULTS

The proportion of stem neck notching was 11% (49 of 456). There were no differences in cup abduction and anteversion between hips with notches and those without notches. Notched hips were more likely to have 28-mm than 32-mm heads (90% [44 of 49] versus 70% [285 of 407]; odds ratio 3.77 [95% CI 1.46 to 9.73]; p = 0.004). None of the 49 notched hips had a ceramic head or liner fracture or evidence of metallosis. A ceramic head fracture was reported in 2% (9 of 456); all fractures occurred in 28-mm short neck heads. A ceramic liner fracture occurred in 0.2% (1 of 456), and noise was noted in 6% (27 of 456). Acetabular osteolysis developed in 2% (7 of 456). The mHHS was 91 ± 12 points at the final follow-up. The survivorship free from implant revision was 97% (95% CI 96% to 99%), and the survivorship free from reoperation for any cause was 96% (95% CI 95% to 98%) at 13 years.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of stems with neck-ceramic liner impingement and ceramic component fracture were unacceptably high after the use of a thick-neck stem design, especially when a 28-mm head was used. We have discontinued the use of this stem design and we recommend that such stems should not be used when CoC bearings are used. As these findings might be generalized to other bearing couples, further studies focused on polyethylene liner wear and local metallosis due to thick stem neck are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Surgeons’ Awareness and Impaction Technique of a Ceramic Liner into a Metal Shell

Background

In ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty, firm locking is necessary between a ceramic liner and an acetabular metal shell to prevent dissociation of the liner from the metal shell. We evaluated surgeons’ awareness of the technique for inserting the ceramic liner and measured the impaction force applied by surgeons during the insertion of the ceramic liner.

Methods

To evaluate the awareness, we conducted a survey using a questionnaire including techniques for ceramic liner insertion. The impaction force was measured using an impaction simulator in 224 surgeons.

Results

Most surgeons answered that they cleaned and dried up the inner surface of the metal shell before inserting a ceramic liner (96.4% and 86.2%, respectively), and 74.6% checked the correct seating of the ceramic liner. However, only 23.2% correctly answered that a minimum of 2kN (a light strike) was necessary to obtain a sufficient fit between the metal shell and the ceramic liner. The impaction force was weaker than 2 kN in 9.4% of the surgeons.

Conclusions

Education about the adequate impaction force to obtain a firm fit of the ceramic liner is necessary for surgeons who perform total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.

Fracture of a 40-mm BIOLOX Delta Femoral Head

Ceramic bearing surfaces have gained popularity in total hip arthroplasty as a result of the favorable mechanical properties and low wear rates. Despite the recognition as an attractive articulation, problems such as ceramic head fracture persist. Smaller heads and higher body mass indices are touted as risk factors for ceramic head fracture and are often associated with antecedent trauma. We present a case report of an 83-year-old male with a body mass index of 26.7 kg/m² who suffered a fracture of a 40-mm ceramic femoral head. This occurred atraumatically 5 years from his index surgery. This patient underwent revision total hip arthroplasty which included debridement of ceramic debris and alteration of the bearing surface with femoral head and polyethylene liner exchange.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Ceramic-On-Ceramic Bearing Breakage in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing breakage is a rare but significant complication of total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to identify risk factors for breakage and to determine the outcome of different revision options.

METHODS

All ceramic-on-ceramic primary total hip arthroplasty procedures reported to the Australian Joint Replacement Registry from September 1999 to December 2019 were included. Procedures were subdivided into alumina or mixed ceramic (alumina/zirconia). All breakages were identified. The association between ceramic type and head size was assessed. Subsequent revision rates were compared and cause of revision assessed.

RESULTS

There were 23,534 alumina and 71,144 mixed ceramic procedures. Breakage was the reason for 1^st revision in 84 alumina (5.27% of all revisions and 0.36% of procedures) and 56 mixed ceramic procedures (2.46% of all revisions; 0.08% of procedures). Alumina had a higher breakage rate than mixed ceramic (HR 2.50 (95% CI 1.75, 3.59), P < .001), and breakage was higher for 36-38mm head sizes using alumina (HR 2.84 (1.52, 5.31), P = .001). 17.8% of 2^nd revisions occur by 3 years, due to dislocation, infection, metal-related pathology, and loosening. A neck adapter sleeve did not reduce 2^nd revisions. Numbers were too low to compare revision bearing surface options.

CONCLUSION

Ceramic breakage has reduced with mixed ceramics but has a 0.79/1000 incidence at 15-year follow-up. It is unclear what the risk factors are for modern ceramics with increasing head size a risk for alumina only. Risk of 2^nd revision is high and occurs early. The optimal revision option is unknown.

Preventing ceramic liner fracture after Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with use of Delta ceramic articulation were successful at medium term follow-up. The use of this newest ceramic has markedly reduced the incidence of ceramic head fractures, but not the incidence of ceramic liner fractures. We tested a hypothesis that the ceramic fractures are prevented by use of a metal shell with 18° inner taper angle and a stem design with a reduced neck geometry.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicenter study of cementless THA with use of 32/36-mm Delta ceramic bearing, Exceed ABT metal shell and Taperloc stem. We evaluated ceramic fracture, noise, clinical results, radiological changes and survival rate at a minimum of 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

From April 2010 to February 2012, 246 patients (274 THAs) were enrolled. Among them, 224 patients (130 men and 94 women, 250 hips) were followed-up for 5-8 years (mean 6.0 years). Ceramic malseating or fracture did not occur in any patient. Eight patients (8 hips, 3.2%) reported noise. Mean Harris hip score was 84 points at the latest follow-up. All acetabular and femoral components had bone-ingrown stability. Two hips were revised due to recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. The survival rate was 99.6% at 8 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Ceramic fractures can be prevented by a use of (1) 32/36-mm Delta ceramic bearing, (2) metal shell with 18° taper angle, and (2) stem with a reduced neck geometry. However, noise remains a concern of the Delta ceramic bearing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level II.

Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: an Updated Review of ARCO on Pathogenesis, Staging and Treatment

Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) usually affects adults younger than 50 years and frequently leads to femoral head collapse and subsequent arthritis of the hip. It is becoming more prevalent along with increasing use of corticosteroids for the adjuvant therapy of leukemia and other myelogenous diseases as well as management of organ transplantation. This review updated knowledge on the pathogenesis, classification criteria, staging system, and treatment of ONFH.

The reasons for ceramic-on-ceramic revisions between the third- and fourth-generation bearings in total hip arthroplasty from multicentric registry data

This study aimed to evaluate (1) the overall reasons for first revision in CoC THAs; (2) whether the reasons for revision differ between third-generation and fourth-generation CoC THAs; and (3) the specific factors associated with bearing-related problems as the reason for revision. We retrospectively reviewed 2045 patients (2194 hips) who underwent first revision THA between 2004 and 2013, among which 146 hips with CoC bearings underwent revision. There were 92 hips with third-generation ceramic bearings and 54 hips with fourth-generation ceramic bearings. The major reasons for CoC THA revisions were ceramic fracture and loosening of the cup or stem. When ceramic fracture, squeaking, incorrect ceramic insertion, and unexplained pain were defined as directly related or potentially related to ceramic use, 28.8% (42/146) of CoC revisions were associated with bearing-related problems. Among the third-generation ceramic bearings, revision was performed in 41.3% (38/92) of cases owing to bearing-related problems whereas revisions were performed for only 7.4% (4/54) of cases with fourth-generation ceramic bearings owing to bearing-related problems (p < 0.001). Younger age, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and preoperative diagnosis of osteonecrosis were factors related to CoC THA revisions due to bearing-related problems.

Cementless total hip arthroplasty with delta-on-delta ceramic bearing in patients younger than 30 years

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the mechanical properties of alumina ceramics, the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with contemporary ceramic bearings in young patients remains a matter of concern. We evaluated the results of cementless THA with the use of the delta ceramic bearing, and determined the prevalence of osteolysis, squeaking, and ceramic fracture in patients aged < 30 years at mid-term.

METHODS

From March 2008 to January 2012, 76 consecutive patients (91 hips), younger than 30 years, underwent cementless THA with Delta ceramic bearings. In each follow-up, the clinical evaluation including noise and radiological evaluations were recorded.

RESULTS

Among them, 72 patients (86 THAs) were followed-up for a minimum of 5 years (mean 70.8; 60-95.9 months). There were 44 men (47 hips) and 28 women (39 hips). The mean age at the time of the index arthroplasty was 25.9 (16-30) years and the mean preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 59.4 (23-79) points. HHS improved to 96.3 (64-100) points at the final follow-up evaluation. 8 hips (9.3%) exhibited grinding or squeaking. No hip had aseptic loosening and no hip was revised. No osteolysis was detected around any acetabular or femoral components.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that cementless THA with the use of Delta ceramic bearing provides satisfactory results without osteolysis or ceramic fracture in patients aged <30 years at a mid-term follow-up.Clinical Trials.gov Protocol Registration System (trial no. NCT01838096).

Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty is superior to metal-on-conventional polyethylene at 20-year follow-up: A randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Metal-on-conventional polyethylene (MoPc) bearing wear-related biological reactions in total hip arthroplasty (THA) continue to raise concerns among young, active patients. Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings may offer improved outcomes in this patient population.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The aim of this study was to determine if, more than 20years postoperatively, there is a difference between MoPc and CoC THA in terms of (1) survivorship, (2) related complications, (3) radiographic signs of wear, and (4) functional scores.

HYPOTHESIS

CoC bearing THAs have superior clinical results compared to MoPc THAs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 140 hips in 116 patients with a mean age of 42years were randomised to receive CoC or MoPc THA between 1996 and 2001. Sixty-nine hips in 58 patients received MoP and 71 hips in 68 patients received CoC. Revision rate, WOMAC score, and radiological signs of osteolysis and loosening were compared at last follow-up.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 21years (19-23), 40 patients (48 THAs; 34%) had died and 6 patients (6 THAs; 4%) were lost to follow-up. Aseptic revision rate was significantly higher in the MoPc group (17/69; 24.6%) versus CoC (2/71; 2.8%; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator with revision for aseptic reasons was 73.6% (95% CI: 63.3-84.9%) for MoPc and 96.9% (95% CI: 92.8-100%) for CoC (p<0.001). On radiographic evaluation, 13% (3/23) MoPc were considered loose versus no CoC, and 61% (14/23) MoPc versus 6% (2/33) CoC showed osteolytic signs (p<0.001). CoC had better mean WOMAC scores than MoPc (11.0 vs. 19.4; p=0.048). No ceramic fracture was observed.

CONCLUSION

In this RCT, CoC bearings provided excellent results and were safer than MoPc bearings at more than 20-year follow-up. The long-term in vivo behaviour of CoC bearing makes it a great THA option for middle-aged patients and should be compared to newer polyethylene bearings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Early Short-Term Postoperative Mechanical Failures of Current Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasties

Although ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings have been shown to produce the smallest amount of wear volume in vitro as well as in vivo studies when used for total hip arthroplasties (THA), concerns about the failure of these bearing surfaces persist due to early failures observed after short postoperative time. In this study, an exhaustive analysis of the early failure occurred on the new generation of ceramic bearings, consisting of a composite alumina matrix-based material reinforced with yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) particles, chromium dioxide, and strontium crystals, was performed. For this study, 118 CoC bearings from 117 patients were revised. This article describes a group of mechanical failure CoC-bearing BIOLOX THA hip prosthesis patients without trauma history. The retrieved samples were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM), composition was analyzed with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and damaged surfaces were analyzed by grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD) and white light interferometry. In the short term, CoC articulations provided similar mechanical behavior and functional outcome to those in XLPE cases. However, 5% more early mechanical failures cases were observed for the ceramic components. Although the fracture rate of third generation CoC couples is low, the present study shows the need to further improve the third generation of CoC-bearing couples for THA. Despite the improved wear compared to other materials, stress concentrators are sources of initial crack propagation, such as those found in the bore-trunnion areas. Moreover, in view of the evidence observed in this study, the chipping observed was due to the presence of monoclinic phase of the Y-TZP instead of tetragonal, which presents better mechanical properties. The results showed that total safety after receiving a THA is still a goal to be pursued.

What Is the Frequency of Fracture of Ceramic Components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017

BACKGROUND

Ceramic bearings in THA have been used to reduce wear and, more recently, to avoid metals in the bearing because of the risk of metal ions adverse effects. Potential disadvantages to ceramic bearings are their brittleness and the ceramic fracture risk, which may lead to revision surgery. The frequency of revision for a fracture ceramic bearing, however, has not been thoroughly studied.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the frequency of revision for a fractured ceramic bearing in ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THAs, and is there any difference between alumina ceramics and alumina matrix composites (AMC)? (2) What are the factors associated with this complication? (3) To what extent did the patients who underwent revision for a fractured ceramic bearing undergo subsequent revisions, and for what reason?

METHODS

The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register has collected data on hip arthroplasty since 1987 and has a completeness of reporting of 97.3% for primary THAs and 93.3% for revision. From 1997 to 2017, 146,171 primary THAs were registered in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Of these, 31,479 had a CoP articulation and 5790 had a CoC articulation. Two manufacturers produced ceramic heads; one produced 25,678 alumina heads and the other made 2465 alumina heads. All 7901 AMC heads were made by the same manufacturer. Patients who underwent CoP THA were a median (range) of 63 years old (11 to 98) and CoC THA were a median (range) 61 years old (17 to 95); 38% (11,833 of 31,479) of the patients who underwent CoP THA and 41% (2379 of 5790) of the patients who underwent CoC THA were males. Femoral heads made of alumina (n = 28,143), zirconia (n = 1225), and AMC (n = 7901) ceramics were used. To assess revision frequency, we identified patients who underwent revision because of fracture of a ceramic head and/or liner, and calculated the Kaplan-Meier survivorship free of revision for fracture in CoC and CoP articulations. Alumina ceramics and AMC were compared. In terms of factors potentially associated with revision, patient factors (age, sex, and diagnosis), type of articulation (CoP or CoC), femoral head size, and femoral head/neck length were evaluated with Cox regression models to evaluate any association with ceramic fracture and a Poisson regression to compare alumina and AMC head fractures. To evaluate subsequent revisions, hips that were revised for ceramic fracture were evaluated for any further revisions; Kaplan-Meier survivorship free of further revisions was calculated, and revision causes were identified.

RESULTS

Survivorship free from revision for ceramic fracture was 99.9% (95% CI 99.9 to 99.9) for CoP bearings, and 99.8% (95% CI 99.6 to 100) for CoC bearings at 10 years, with 7467 and 1884 hips at risk in the two groups, respectively. The hazard ratio for ceramic head fracture was 3.6 (95% CI 1.7 to 7.6) for CoC compared with CoP. The risk of fracture was greater for alumina ceramics than for AMC heads (adjusted HR 14.1 [95% CI 4.2 to 47.0]; p < 0.001). Factors that were associated with revision for fracture of a ceramic head were male sex (HR 5.2 [95% CI 2.6 to 10.4]; p < 0.001), a CoC articulation compared with CoP (HR 3.6 [95% CI 1.7 to 7.6]; p = 0.001), a 28-mm femoral head compared with a 32-mm head (HR 2.7 [95% CI 1.1 to 6.4]; p = 0.02), and short head/neck length compared with a medium head/neck length (HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.1 to 5.3]; p = 0.03). Five of 50 patients undergoing revision for ceramic fracture underwent further revisions, resulting in a 5-year survivorship free from re-revision of 86% (95% CI 74.4 to 98.0). The reasons for re-revision were infection (n = 2), another ceramic head fracture (n = 2), and cup loosening (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Fracture of a ceramic THA bearing is rare and seems to affect about one in 1000 patients who receive such a bearing. To minimize the risk of this complication, surgeons should avoid small femoral heads (< 32 mm) and the shortest head/neck lengths. Surgeons should also know that the risk is increased in CoC articulations and in males. Bearings made of AMC appear to be at lower risk than those made from alumina ceramics. However, the long-term clinical wear performance of AMC bearings has not been extensively studied and should be studied further.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Incidence of Ceramic Fracture in Contemporary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Proportions

BACKGROUND

We performed a proportion meta-analysis of currently available data to determine the prevalence of ceramic fracture for each generation.

METHODS

A total of 10,571 total hip arthroplasties from 45 studies were included. Proportion meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed to estimate the prevalence of ceramic fracture. To determine whether the ceramic fractures have a fatigue nature and a risk or latent period for the development, postoperative time lapse, patient age, and body mass index were related with ceramic fracture by metaregression analysis.

RESULTS

As of postoperative 2.0 to 18.8 years, the rate of ceramic fracture was 0.5% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.8%) in the forte group and 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%) in the delta group (P = .059). The ceramic fracture rate for each component was 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.3%) for the forte head, 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.2%) for the delta head (P = .210), 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.3%) for the forte liner, and 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%) for the delta liner (P = .305). The rate of ceramic fracture per 1000 patient-years was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-0.13) in the forte group and 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-0.8) in the delta group (P = .072). In metaregression analysis, no significant associations were found between prevalence of ceramic fracture and postoperative time lapse, patient age, or body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of ceramic fracture was 0.9/1000 patient-year in the forte group and 0.5/1000 patient-year in the delta group. The results of this study provide baseline data for further studies validating ceramic bearings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, meta-analysis.

Ultra-Short Anatomic Uncemented Femoral Stem and Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing in Patients With Idiopathic or Ethanol-Induced Femoral Head Osteonecrosis

BACKGROUND

Long-term result of the ultra-short anatomic cementless stem in the patients with idiopathic or ethanol-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head has not been assessed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical, radiographic, computed tomography scan, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning results, and survivorship of this specific femoral stem in patients with idiopathic or ethanol-induced femoral head osteonecrosis.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-six patients (335 hips) with an average age of 49.8 years (range 20-63) were enrolled in the current study. All patients underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning of the acetabulum and proximal femur preoperatively and at final follow-up. Computed tomography scan was obtained in all patients at final follow-up. The mean follow-up was 14.7 years (range 13-16).

RESULTS

At final follow-up, the average Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 94 points, 12 points, and 8 points, respectively. Four stems (1%) underwent revision for aseptic loosening. One acetabular component (0.3%) was revised for recurrent dislocation. No hip was revised for squeaking or clicking sound. Survivorship of the femoral stem was 99.0% (95% confidence interval 94-100) and that of the acetabular component was 99.4% (95% confidence interval 95-100) at 14.7 years.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-short proximal loading anatomic uncemented femoral stems with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have excellent survivorship free from aseptic loosening and good clinical results at long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Incidence of a stem sitting proud of a proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stem

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

A stem sitting proud (SP) or that above the final rasp position remains in some patients who undergo hip replacement using proximally coated tapered wedge stems. Surgeons may face challenges providing the best fit because of unpredictable SP of proximally coated tapered wedge stems. Zimmer Inc. introduced a new rasp to solve this issue but the clinical results of this rasp have not yet been published. Therefore, our aim was to address the following: (1) What is the stem SP incidence using a proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stem? (2) Does the new rasp system (0-mm rasp) improve seating height? and (3) What are the risk factors of stem SP?

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study with 338 hips, in which Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem (BPS) was used in 181 hips and M/L Taper stem was used in 157 hips (82 hips before and 75 hips after 0-mm rasp use). A positive stem SP was defined as a stem proud height of >2 mm. We analysed and compared SP incidence in two stems and M/L Taper stems before and after the 0-mm rasp use.

RESULTS

An incidence of stem SP was 13% in the Tri-Lock BPS and 15% in the M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm rasp use. Stem SP incidence in the M/L Taper stem substantially decreased after the 0-mm rasp use (4%). The significant risk factor for stem SP was use of the high offset option in Tri-Lock BPS.

CONCLUSION

The proximally coated tapered wedge stems present potential problems related to stem SP. The new rasp of the M/L Taper stem showed significant improvement in initial seating height.

THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE

This study was conducted to understand "stem sitting proud" in proximally coated tapered wedge stem as one of the most popular designs nowadays in adult hip joint arthroplasty field. In this study, we aimed to address the incidence of stem proud, investigated the risk factor and introduced the effect of new rasp system which improve stem seating height.

Long-Term Outcomes of Ultra-Short Metaphyseal-Fitting Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Ceramic-on-Ceramic Articulation for Young Patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the long-term outcomes of this specific stem in patients younger than 50 years old, with regard to clinical and radiographic outcomes, survivorship, and complication rate.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-nine consecutive series of patients (324 hips) who were younger than 50 years old at the time of surgery were enrolled in the study. Osteonecrosis (50%) and dysplastic hip (34%) were most common diagnoses. Patients were informed to use crutches or walker for 4 weeks to protect the femoral component against rotational stress. The mean follow-up was 15.6 years (range 14-17).

RESULTS

At the latest follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 93 points, 13 points, and 7 points, respectively. Three patients (1.3%) had moderate thigh pain. All of the acetabular components and 321 (99%) femoral stems were solidly fixed at the time of the latest follow-up. Three stems (0.9%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Two hips (0.6%) had a dislocation and 2 hips (0.6%) had a periprosthetic fracture. Ceramic fracture or osteolysis was not found in any hip at the time of the final follow-up. Survival rate of the femoral component was 99.1% (95% confidence interval 94-100) and that of the acetabular component was 100% (95% confidence interval 94-100) at 15.6 years.

CONCLUSION

In this series, THA using an ultra-short metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless femoral stem provided excellent long-term clinical and radiographic results in patients younger than 50 years old. Furthermore, our initial theoretical concerns about early aseptic loosening due to the absence of distal stem fixation were not justified.

A focused update on preventing ceramic fractures in hip arthroplasty

Ceramic bearings have several desirable properties, such as resistance to wear, hardness, and biocompatibility, that favour it as an articulating surface in hip arthroplasty. However, ceramic fracture remains a concern. We have reviewed the contemporary literature, addressing the factors that can influence the incidence of ceramic bearing surface fracture.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:897–901.

Midterm Results of Fourth-Generation Ceramic-On-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

There are limited reports for the results of the fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulation total hip arthroplasty (THA). And, throughout the surgical experience, we encountered some cases of liner pulling-out phenomenon after liner fixation and femoral preparation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors of delta ceramic liner or head fractures, and also the clinical and radiological results of using the fourth-generation CoC articulation in THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients (263 hips) who underwent primary THA using the fourth-generation CoC articulation with a minimum followup of 2 years. Demographic data, Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Patient's satisfactory level were recorded. The radiological evaluation was used to evaluate the implant fixation and complications. Mean followup duration was 5.2 years.

RESULTS

Mean HHS and WOMAC score were significantly (P < 0.05) improved at the last followup. About 98.5% of the patients were satisfied with results of the surgery. All acetabular components were placed in adequate position and there was no osteolysis on acetabular or femoral components and subsidence of femoral stem. Four patients showed complications including one-liner fracture.

CONCLUSION

Our midterm study demonstrated excellent clinical and radiological results with only one ceramic liner fracture. Moreover, the results of this study indicate that one possible cause of pulling-out phenomenon is the resonance effect during implantation in Dorr type A patients with the thick cortex. If the surgeon is aware of the liner malposition throughout the operation, the fourth-generation CoC articulation THA could be an outstanding treatment.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Hybrid Ceramic Bearing: A Minimum 10-Year Followup Study

BACKGROUND

Contemporary ceramic articulation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has shown successful clinical and radiologic outcomes at mid-to-long term. Delta ceramic, which includes 24% zirconia, has been developed to reduce the rate of ceramic fracture. However, the phase transformation of the zirconia that might cause surface roughness, ceramic wear, and subsequent osteolysis remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinicoradiological outcomes, ceramic-related complications, and survivorship of THA with the use of hybrid ceramic bearing; BIOLOX delta liner-on-BIOLOX forte head articulation at a minimum followup of 10 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred cementless THAs (85 patients) were performed with the use of 36-mm hybrid ceramic bearing. The thickness of the delta ceramic liner was 4-6 mm. Four patients (4 hips) were lost and six patients (6 hips) died within 10 years after the operation. Thus, the remaining 75 patients (90 hips) were followed up for 10-12 years. There were 43 men and 32 women. The mean age of these patients at the index operation was 58 years (21-78 years).

RESULTS

There were no fractures of ceramic liner or head. There was no measurable ceramic wear, and neither pelvic nor femoral osteolysis was identified. All acetabular and femoral components were bone-ingrown. Three (3/90, 3.3%) patients noted noise of clicking sound. The mean Harris hip score was 87 points (range 72-99 points) at the time of final followup. THA survivorship with revision surgery as an endpoint was 97.8% (95% confidence interval: 91.4%-99.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The long term result of cementless THA with the use of a large BIOLOX forte head on the BIOLOX delta liner showed an encouraging result. Wear or osteolysis associated with composite of 24% zirconia in the fourth-generation ceramic was not observed at a minimum followup of 10 years.

Could larger diameter of 4th generation ceramic bearing increase the rate of squeaking after THA?: A retrospective study

The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and bearing-specific complications in a single center of 135 delta ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and explore the occurrence rate of squeaking in 4th generation COC THAs and collate the risk factors for squeaking.We retrospectively analyzed consecutive cohorts of 127 patients (135 hips) who had primary THA with delta COC bearings in our hospital between April 2010 and April 2012. Preoperative Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. We also evaluated ceramic fracture, squeak, mid-term results, and survival.In our study, the final patient final follow-up date was July 31, 2016. The mean preoperative HHS improved from 39.5 to 93.1 points. Mean preoperative UCLA score was 3.2 points, improving to 8.2 points. The mean preoperative total WOMAC score was 55.5 points and the mean total WOMAC score was 13.3 points at the final follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier survival plot of revision for any reason as the end point was 98.5% and survival with ceramic fracture as the end point was 99.2% at a mean of 70 months' follow-up. One post-operative ceramic liner rim fracture occurred at 50 months after surgery. Thirteen of the 135 hips produced a squeaking sound. There were no significant differences in gender (P = .56), age (P = .20), body mass index (BMI) (P = .11), diagnosis (P = .46), cup inclination (P = .36), or cup anteversion (P = 1.0) between the squeaking and non-squeaking groups. However, the incidence of squeaking in the 36 mm COC femoral head bearings was higher than in the 28 mm size (13.6% vs 2.1%, P = .033).The 4th generation COC bearing performed well and provides an encouraging rate of survival with no osteolysis or loosening. However, we found that a squeaking sound associated with use of the delta ceramic occurred at a rate of 9.6%, with the larger-diameter heads having significantly higher incidence.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty after Ceramic Bearing Fractures in Patients Under 60-years Old; Mid-term Results

Purpose

Although advances in technology have reduced the risk of ceramic implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty, these injuries do occur and their treatment remains challenging. There is a lack of studies reporting on the effectiveness of ceramic components in revision hip arthroplasty after ceramic bearing fracture. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of revision surgery with ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic bearing fractures in young (i.e., under 60 years old) and active patients.

Materials and Methods

Eight patients who, from May 2004 to November 2011, underwent ceramic-on-ceramic revision surgery following a ceramic component fracture and had more than 6 years follow up were enrolled in this study. All eight patients were male with mean ages at first and revision surgeries of 39 years (range, 31–50 years) and 43.8 years (range, 33–60 years), respectively. There were 6 and 2 cases of ceramic liner and ceramic head fractures, respectively. The average time from the first operation to revision surgery was 54.3 months (range, 9–120 months), and the average follow up period was 9.7 years (range, 6–13.3 years).

Results

At the last follow up, all patients showed improvement in Harris hip score and pain relief and there were no cases of loosening or osteolysis.

Conclusion

Revision total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic component fracture is a feasible and appropriate surgical option in young and active patients.

Isolated revision of the acetabular component using alumina-on-alumina bearings without a metal sleeve: A preliminary study

INTRODUCTION

There has been a debate on the use of ceramic-on-ceramic coupling with the retained femoral stem in isolated acetabular revision. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the results and complications of isolated revision of the acetabular component using alumina-on-alumina bearings.

METHODS

Between August 2010 and December 2013, 22 patients (23 hips) with a mean age of 60.74 years (40-73) underwent isolated revision of the acetabular component from metal-on-polyethylene to alumina-on-alumina bearings without using a metal sleeve on the undamaged trunnion. All patients completed clinical and radiographic evaluation.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 3 years (2-5.5), all patients had a significant improvement in the clinical outcome, including Harris Hip Score (84.9 vs. 43, p < 0.001), West Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index Score (14.4 vs. 49.2, p < 0.001), and visual analogue pain score (1.42 vs. 6.63, p < 0.001). Complications included one aseptic loosening of the acetabular component and three noisy hips (click only). No fracture of the ceramic bearings, dislocation, infection, or squeaking noise were observed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Isolated revision of the acetabular component to alumina-on-alumina bearings on the undamaged trunnion may be considered if there is no available titanium sleeves. Our study showed a satisfactory early outcome with minimal complications. However, a longer term follow-up study is necessary.

3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

3^rd generation ceramic bearings were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the potential to have better mechanical strength and wear properties than their predecessors. At present, there are few studies looking at the long-term results of this latest generation of ceramic bearings. The purpose of our study was to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of 3^rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA and the incidence of ceramic specific complications such as squeaking and bearing surface fracture.

METHODS

The database of the senior author (J.D.W.) was reviewed. A total of 126 hip replacements performed in 108 patients (average age 39.6 years) with an average follow-up of 12.1 years (10-16 years) was identified. Clinical notes and plain radiographs were reviewed. To measure function, patients were contacted and an Oxford Hip Questionnaire was completed. Patients were also directly questioned about the presence of squeaking or any other sounds from the hip. Radiographs were evaluated for signs of wear, osteolysis, loosening and heterotopic ossification. The abduction angle of the acetabular component was measured.

RESULTS

The average Oxford Hip Score was 39.8 out of 48. Survivorship at 10 years was 94.6% (95% CI) with revision for any cause as the endpoint. There was 1 femoral head fracture, no osteolysis, no squeaking and no detectable wear.

CONCLUSIONS

The good clinical and radiographic results for this series of patients are similar to other recent long-term studies looking at 3^rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA. The results compare favourably with other bearing surfaces. The lack of osteolysis associated with this articulation is encouraging and may also make it a good choice for younger patients requiring total hip replacement.

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing fractures in total hip arthroplasty

Aims

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are commonly used, but concerns exist regarding ceramic fracture. This study aims to report the risk of revision for fracture of modern CoC bearings and identify factors that might influence this risk, using data from the National Joint Registry (NJR) for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

Patients and Methods

We analysed data on 223 362 bearings from 111 681 primary CoC THAs and 182 linked revisions for bearing fracture recorded in the NJR. We used implant codes to identify ceramic bearing composition and generated Kaplan-Meier estimates for implant survivorship. Logistic regression analyses were performed for implant size and patient specific variables to determine any associated risks for revision.

Results

A total of 222 852 bearings (99.8%) were CeramTec Biolox products. Revisions for fracture were linked to seven of 79 442 (0.009%) Biolox Delta heads, 38 of 31 982 (0.119%) Biolox Forte heads, 101 of 80 170 (0.126%) Biolox Delta liners and 35 of 31 258 (0.112%) Biolox Forte liners. Regression analysis of implant size revealed smaller heads had significantly higher odds of fracture (chi-squared 68.0, p < 0.001). The highest fracture risk was observed in the 28 mm Biolox Forte subgroup (0.382%). There were no fractures in the 40 mm head group for either ceramic type. Liner thickness was not predictive of fracture (p = 0.67). Body mass index (BMI) was independently associated with revision for both head fractures (odds ratio (OR) 1.09 per unit increase, p = 0.031) and liner fractures (OR 1.06 per unit increase, p = 0.006).

Conclusions

We report the largest independent study of CoC bearing fractures to date. The risk of revision for CoC bearing fracture is very low but previous studies have underestimated this risk. There is good evidence that the latest generation of ceramic has greatly reduced the odds of head fracture but not of liner fracture. Small head size and high patient BMI are associated with an increased risk of ceramic bearing fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1012–19.

3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

3rd generation ceramic bearings were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the potential to have better mechanical strength and wear properties than their predecessors. At present, there are few studies looking at the long-term results of this latest generation of ceramic bearings.The purpose of our study was to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of 3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA and the incidence of ceramic specific complications such as squeaking and bearing surface fracture.

METHODS

The database of the senior author (J.D.W.) was reviewed. A total of 126 hip replacements performed in 108 patients (average age 39.6 years) with an average follow-up of 12.1 years (10-16 years) was identified. Clinical notes and plain radiographs were reviewed. To measure function, patients were contacted and an Oxford Hip Questionnaire was completed. Patients were also directly questioned about the presence of squeaking or any other sounds from the hip. Radiographs were evaluated for signs of wear, osteolysis, loosening and heterotopic ossification. The abduction angle of the acetabular component was measured.

RESULTS

The average Oxford Hip Score was 39.8 out of 48. Survivorship at 10 years was 94.6% (95% CI) with revision for any cause as the endpoint. There was 1 femoral head fracture, no osteolysis, no squeaking and no detectable wear.

CONCLUSIONS

The good clinical and radiographic results for this series of patients are similar to other recent long-term studies looking at 3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA. The results compare favourably with other bearing surfaces. The lack of osteolysis associated with this articulation is encouraging and may also make it a good choice for younger patients requiring total hip replacement.

Mid-term results of the BIOLOX delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

Aims

We conducted a prospective study of a delta ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) to determine the rate of ceramic fracture, to characterise post-operative noise, and to evaluate the mid-term results and survivorship.

Patients and Methods

Between March 2009 and March 2011, 274 patients (310 hips) underwent cementless THA using a delta ceramic femoral head and liner. At each follow-up, clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was undertaken to estimate survival.

Results

Four patients (four hips) died and 18 patients (20 hips) were lost to follow-up within five years. The remaining 252 patients (286 hips) were followed for a mean of 66.5 months (60 to 84). There were 144 men (166 hips) and 108 women (120 hips) with a mean age of 49.7 years (16 to 83) at surgery. The mean pre-operative Harris Hip Score of 47.1 points improved to 93.8 points at final follow-up. Six patients reported squeaking in seven hips; however, none were audible. Radiolucent lines involving Gruen zones one and/or seven were seen in 52 hips (18.2%). No hip had detectable wear, focal osteolysis or signs of loosening. One hip was revised because of fracture of the ceramic liner, which occurred due to an undetected malseating of the ceramic liner at the time of surgery. One hip was revised for a periprosthetic fracture of the femur, and one hip was treated for periprosthetic joint infection. The six-year survivorship with re-operation for any reason as the endpoint was 99.0% (95% confidence interval 97.8% to 100%).

Discussion

The rate of delta ceramic fracture was 0.3% (one of 286). While ceramic head fracture was dominant in previous ceramic-on-ceramic THA, fracture of the delta ceramic liner due to malseating is a concern. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:741–8.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Fractured Ceramic Bearings: A Review of Best Practices for Revision Cases

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty revision for a fractured ceramic bearing is rare but offers unique challenges. The purpose of this review was to provide a summary of existing literature on fractured ceramic bearings.

METHODS

Two authors performed a literature search of the MEDLINE OVID and PubMed databases with the following search terms: ceramic, fracture, total hip arthroplasty, and revision.

RESULTS

The search identified 228 articles of which 199 were selected for review.

CONCLUSIONS

It is mandatory to perform a complete synovectomy and thorough debridement of the fractured ceramic fragments. A well-fixed acetabular component should be removed if either the locking mechanism is damaged or the component is malpositioned. If the femoral stem taper is damaged, the femoral stem should be removed. However, if minimal damage is present, the femoral stem may be retained and revised using a fourth generation ceramic head with a titanium sleeve. Metal bearings should be avoided and revision with ceramic bearings should be performed whenever possible.

Effect of Inner Taper Angle of Acetabular Metal Shell on the Malseating and Dissociation Force of Ceramic Liner

BACKGROUND

Malseating of ceramic liner appeared as a matter of concern in multibearing metal, although multibearing cup can be coupled with hard liners as well as polyethylene liner. In this metal shell, the inner taper angle should be 10° for the modularity, while standard metal shells for ceramic liner have an inner taper angle of 18°. However, there has been no study in the effect of taper angle to the risk of malseating. We evaluated whether the taper angle of metal shell might affect the malseating of ceramic liner, and dissociation force of ceramic liner from metal shell.

METHODS

Three surgeons manually inserted ceramic liners into two designs of metal shell with different tapers angles (10° and 18°). We compared malseating rates of ceramic liners and push-out strengths, which means dissociation force of the ceramic liner from the metal shell, between these two metal shell designs.

RESULTS

The malseating rates in 10° metal shell were higher than those in 18° metal shell (23.3% vs 0%, P < .05). The mean dissociation force (1148.8 ± 46.7 N) in 10° taper cup was higher than that (389.7 ± 108.3 N) in 18° taper cup (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that surgeon should be cautious about malseating of ceramic liner when using multi-bearing metal shell with inner taper angle of 10°.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When surgeon use multi-bearing metal shell with inner taper angle of 10°, our results suggest that surgeon should be cautious about malseating of ceramic liner.

Long Term Survivorship of a Severely Notched Femoral Stem after Replacing the Fractured Ceramic head with a Cobalt-Chromium Head

Background:

Although ceramic head fracture occurs infrequently today, in the event of a fracture, the resulting revision surgery can prove very challenging, since the ceramic particles lodge into the surrounding soft tissue and can cause rapid implant failure

Case Presentation:

A case of long term survivorship of a severed notched femoral stem after replacing the fractured femoral head with a cobalt-chromium one is reported in a 40-year old woman with hip dysplasia who underwent an uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty. The incident of ceramic femoral head fracture occurred 14 months postoperatively without reporting any significant trauma. Intraoperative findings at revision were a multifragmented femoral head and a damaged polyethylene insert along with diffuse metallosis and excessive wear of the cone of the stem. Both the stem and the acetabular component were stable. After removal of ceramic fragments, metallotic tissue excision and careful lavage of the joint, the inlay was replaced by a similar one and a cobalt-chromium femoral head was placed to the existing notched taper of the firmly incorporated stem. At the 13^th year follow up examination, the patient had no pain, used no walking aids, and had normal activity with no signs of wearing or loosening in the plain x-rays.

Conclusion:

Despite current recommendations of using ceramic femoral heads in cases of fracture or to revise the severely damaged stems we were able to provide a long term survivorship up to 13 years postoperatively of a cobalt-chromium femoral head applied to a severe damaged stem.

Granulomatous Lung Disease: A Novel Complication following Metallosis from Hip Arthroplasty

A case of a female patient with local and systemic complications of metallosis, following catastrophic wear of a revised hip arthroplasty, is presented. The patient had a history of a fractured ceramic-on-ceramic implant, exchanged with a metal-on-polyethylene prosthesis. Systemic complications included sarcoidosis-like reactions, presenting as granulomatous lung disease, along with chorioretinitis, erythema nodosum, and cardiomyopathy. High local and circulating cobalt and chromium levels established the diagnosis. The patient underwent extensive debridement and implant revision. One year postoperatively, she had no respiratory symptoms or functional impairment. Local and systemic complications of metallosis after hip arthroplasty should be promptly recognized and treated operatively.

Primary total hip arthroplasty using 3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic articulation

PURPOSE

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) is currently a popular bearing combination in young patients in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic results and complications of cementless THA with 3rd generation CoC articulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2001 to January 2008, 310 primary THAs were performed in 300 patients using 3rd generation CoC articulation. The mean follow-up period was 8.9 years and the mean age at index surgery was 54.6 years. Patient clinical outcome was evaluated with the Harris Hip Score. Radiographic evaluations was performed to analyse osteolysis, implant fixation and loosening.

RESULTS

Mean Harris Hip Score at last follow-up was 95.4 (76-100). Radiographic analysis demonstrated no evidence of stem or cup loosening and there were no cases of osteolysis. Ceramic wear was not detectable on the plain radiograph. Complications requiring revision occurred in 12 cases; 2 ceramic head fractures, 4 dislocations, 2 deep infections and 4 cases of periprosthetic fracture. The cohort had an overall revision rate of 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcomes using cementless THA with 3rd generation CoC articulation were satisfactory. Although the mechanical properties of ceramic materials have improved, there are still problems such as ceramic fracture and squeaking. More clinical study and investigation for alternative bearing are necessary to reduce complications. 4th generation CoC or ceramic on cross linked polyethylene may address some of these issues.

Could larger diameter of 4th generation ceramic bearing decrease the rate of dislocation after THA?

BACKGROUND

Fourth generation (Delta) ceramic bearing was developed to reduce dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) by increasing the head diameter. We tested a hypothesis that 32/36 mm Delta ceramic bearing decreases the dislocation rate. We also evaluated ceramic-related complications and early outcome of this thin liner-on-large head ceramic bearing.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study on patients who underwent THA with use of 32/36 mm Delta ceramic bearing. The dislocation rate was compared with the historical dislocation rate of third generation 28 mm ceramic bearing. We also evaluated ceramic fracture, squeak, short-term results and survival. Follow-up period was minimum 2 years.

RESULTS

Between April 2010 and February 2012, we enrolled 250 consecutive patients (278 hips). All patients received cementless prostheses. Four patients (4 hips) who received metal shells ≤ 46 mm and 28 mm heads were excluded. Three patients died and 2 patients were lost within 2 years. The remaining 241 patients (269 hips) were followed for 24-46 months. There were 142 men (161 hips) and 99 women (108 hips) with a mean age of 53.7 years (range, 17-75 years) at the index operation. Dislocation occurred in three hips (1.1%). An old age was a risk factor for dislocation. Ceramic fracture and squeaking did not occur in any patient. Mean Harris hip score was 90.3 points at the latest follow-up. All acetabular and femoral components had bone-ingrowth stability. No hip had detectable wear or osteolysis. The survival was 99.3% in the best case scenario and 97.8% in the worst at 48 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Total hip arthroplasty with use of 32/36 mm Delta ceramic bearing showed lower incidence of hip dislocation compared with 28 mm third generation ceramic bearing. A caution should be paid to prevent a fall in senile patients even though a large head is used. The short-term results of THA with this type of ceramic articulation are encouraging and we did not find any ceramic-related complications.

Is a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing really superior to ceramic-on-polyethylene for primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The outcomes of using a ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) vs ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearing surface for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are much debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare and evaluate the outcomes of these 2 bearing surfaces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, CENTRAL, Embase and Web of Science) were systematically searched for RCTs investigating the association between bearing surfaces and outcomes following primary THA. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed the risk of bias, extracted and analysed the data.

RESULTS

In total, 13 RCTs including a total of 2,488 THAs were identified. The Harris Hip Score appeared to be similar between CoC and CoP THAs. The acetabular liner wear rate was lower in CoC than CoP THA, but the meta-analysis showed that the incidence of component-related noise and overall ceramic fracture in CoC group were 14.73 times and 6.02 times higher than CoP THA, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of radiolucent line formation (&gt;1 mm), osteolysis, loosening, revision with follow-up ≥ 5 years, intraoperative femoral fracture, dislocation, deep infection, deep venous thrombosis and leg length discrepancy between CoC and CoP THAs.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be no clear evidence favouring the use of either a CoC or CoP bearing surfaces in primary THA, further studies with high-quality and longer term follow-up to provide more evidence on this topic are still required.

Microscale tribological behavior and in vitro biocompatibility of graphene nanoplatelet reinforced alumina

Graphene nanoplatelets were added as reinforcement to alumina ceramics in order to enhance microscale tribological behavior, which would be beneficial for ceramic-on-ceramic hip implant applications. The reduction in microscale wear is critical to hip implant applications where small amounts of wear debris can be detrimental to patients and to implant performance. The addition of the GNPs lead to improvements in fracture toughness and wear (scratch) resistance of 21% and 39%, respectively. The improved wear resistance was attributed to GNP-induced toughening, which generates fine (~100nm) microcracks on the scratch surface. In addition, active participation of GNPs was observed in the scratch subsurface of GNP-reinforced samples through focused ion beam sectioning. Friction coefficients are not significantly influenced by the addition of GNPs, and hence GNPs do not act as solid state lubricants. In vitro biocompatibility with human osteoblasts was assessed to evaluate any possible cytotoxic effects induced by GNPs. Osteoblast cells were observed to survive and proliferate robustly in the GNP-reinforced samples, particularly those with high (10-15vol%) GNP content.

Bearing Change to Metal-On-Polyethylene for Ceramic Bearing Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty; Does It Work?

We evaluated the short-term to midterm results of reoperation with bearing change to metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) after ceramic bearing fracture in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Nine third-generation ceramic bearing fractures (6 heads and 3 liners) were treated with bearing change to MoP. Mean age at reoperation was 52.7 years. Mean follow-up was 4.3 years. During follow-up, 2 of 3 liner-fractured hips and 1 of 6 head-fractured hips showed radiologic signs of metallosis and elevated serum chromium levels. Re-reoperation with bearing rechange to a ceramic head was performed for the hips with metallosis. One liner-fractured hip had periprosthetic joint infection. Dislocation occurred in 3 hips. From our experience, bearing change to MoP is not a recommended treatment option for ceramic bearing fracture in total hip arthroplasty.

Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?

BACKGROUND

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples are theoretically attractive in total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of low wear, but concerns regarding ceramic fracture and squeaking have arisen. Improved material properties of newer alumina matrix composite (AMC) materials, known as Delta ceramics, may reduce these risks. In addition, the use of thinner liners and larger femoral heads may be helpful clinically to lower the rate of dislocation. However, limited short-term clinical results are available and intermediate-term effects are unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the frequency of bearing-related complications (dissociation, fracture, and noise) with ceramic-on-ceramic AMC bearings in cementless THA? (2) What other complications arose in patients treated with these bearings? (3) What are the Harris hip scores (HHS) and survivorship free from reoperation and revision at a minimum of 5 years after cementless THA performed with AMC bearings?

METHODS

Over a 9-month period in 2009, one surgeon performed 125 THAs, of which 100 (80% of the total) were performed with cementless, AMC bearings. During the period in question, the exclusion criteria for this implant were primary THAs with severe acetabular or femoral bone defect and revision THAs. Of these, 94 hips (95%) in 91 patients were available for analysis at a minimum of 5 years (range, 5-6 years), because five patients (six hips) had died. Mean age at the time of arthroplasty was 55 ± 14 years. Prostheses with an identical design and Biolox(®) Delta ceramics were used in all patients. Noise was classified into squeaking, clicking, grinding, and popping. Ceramic fracture, dislocation, and any other complications associated with the use of AMC ceramics were also investigated. Clinical evaluation included the modified HHS preoperatively and at each followup. Survivorship free from reoperation and revision was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 91 patients, four developed bearing-related complications, including one with liner dissociation despite initial square seating and three with clicking. No patients had ceramic fractures. A single event of perioperative dislocation occurred in one patient and postoperative periprosthetic fracture occurred in two hips. Mean HHS improved from 56 to 93 points at the final followup (p < 0.001). Survivorship at 5 years free from reoperation and revision was 96.8% and 97.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved material properties combined with the possible use of larger diameter heads make AMC ceramics a promising alternative bearing option with seemingly comparable clinical outcomes reported by others with conventional ceramic bearings. Despite these encouraging results, however, meticulous technical precautions such as square seating and proper impaction in particular should be taken during liner insertion, because we did observe one liner dissociation and several patients with hip noises.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve

BACKGROUND

Modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have become attractive alternatives to conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a result of their low wear and minimal particle production. However, 28-mm heads in ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples have been associated with ceramic fracture. To address these issues, 32-mm and larger ceramic heads with a titanium-alloy sleeve have been introduced, although limited data are available on their durability and clinical outcomes.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined (1) the survivorship of the primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve at a minimum followup of 5 years; (2) Harris hip scores; (3) the incidence of ceramic fracture and noisy hip; and (4) the proportion of hips showing radiographic evidence of osteolysis.

METHODS

From November 2005 to August 2009, we performed 301 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve in 270 patients. Of these, 12 patients (12 hips [4%]) died from problems unrelated to surgery and 13 patients (15 hips [5%]) were lost during followup before a minimum of 5 years had been reached, leaving 245 patients who had 274 THAs with a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 6.5 years; range, 5-9 years) in this retrospective analysis. During the study period, 30% (301 of 997 hips) were performed with this articulation based on the operating surgeon's discretion. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 55 years (range, 16-82 years). All operations were performed at a single center. All of the ceramic implants were hot isostatic-pressed, laser-marked, proof-tested third-generation alumina. We determined the implant survival, Harris hip scores, incidence of ceramic fracture or noisy hips (based on a questionnaire), and presence of osteolysis.

RESULTS

The survival rate of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in primary THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve was 98% (95% confidence interval, 96%-100%) at 9 years. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 47 points preoperatively to 93 points at last followup. One ceramic head fractured at 6 years postoperatively. No ceramic liners fractured. Audible hip clicking and squeaking were identified in four hips and one hip, respectively. Osteolysis was detected in three hips, but none had symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve has a survivorship of 98% at 9-year followup. Nevertheless, surgeons should be aware of the potential risks of ceramic fracture, noise, and osteolysis associated with the use of a ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

The Survival Analysis in Third-Generation Ceramic-On-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

A total of 527 patients (577 hips) who underwent primary THA using third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulation were retrospectively reviewed. They were followed up for an average of 5.9 years. Seven hips experienced liner fracture and 14 hips experienced head fracture. Squeaking occurred in eight hips. The revision rate in this study was 5.2%, but excluding the cases of ceramic head and liner fracture, there were nine cases (1.6%) of revision surgery. Considering revision for any reason as the end point, mean survivorship was 93% at 10 years. According to the femoral head size and neck length, 28 mm head with short neck has the worst survivorship of 89% at 10 years. Overall, our study showed a higher rate of ceramic fracture compared with other studies.

Atraumatic Fracture of a BIOLOX Delta Ceramic Femoral Head Articulating with a Polyethylene Liner: A Case Report

CASE

We describe the case of a forty-one-year-old man who underwent total hip arthroplasty with a 32-mm BIOLOX delta ceramic head articulating with a polyethylene liner. The patient did not suffer any trauma postoperatively, and his only symptom was of a "clicking" noise from the operatively treated hip. At his six-week postoperative review, fracture of the femoral head was diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

Fracture of a ceramic femoral head is a rare but catastrophic complication. This case report highlights the importance of vigilance on the part of the surgeon when reviewing patients after hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing couples, even with limited symptoms associated with the hip and no reported trauma.

Midterm Outcomes of the Recently FDA Approved Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Under 65 Years of Age

The present study aimed to evaluate the mid-term results of the fourth generation of ceramic on ceramic (CC) bearing. Demographics, surgical technique, complications, clinical and radiologic outcomes were analyzed in a series of 133 consecutive CC total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with a newest generation CC bearings to determine if these provide safe and well performing bearings. At the last follow-up, there were no cases of ceramic fracture or chipping and no revision surgery necessary for bearing related complication. One hip underwent two staged revision for infection and another underwent revision for dislocation, resulting in an overall 98.5% survival rate at a mean of 6 years. The newest generation of CC bearings provides a reliable and safe bearing in young, active patients undergoing THA.

Third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: 14 to 16-year follow-up study

Ceramic-on-ceramic articulation has the lowest wear with little osteolysis. However, the wear and osteolysis in long-term follow-up are not known. Another concern is ceramic fracture, which might occur after repeated stress during a long period. Ninety hips (76 patients with a mean age of 47 years) that underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty using third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic articulation were followed for 14-16 years. At final follow-up, there was no measurable ceramic wear and no periprosthetic osteolysis was identified. No ceramic fracture occurred during the follow-up. One hip was revised because of late infection. All prostheses were bone-ingrown. Two patients experienced a grinding sensation. However, no patient had squeak. The mean Harris hip score at the final evaluation was 89 points and the survival rate was 98.9%.