Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management

[Periprosthetic acetabular fractures: classifications, treatment and challenges]

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures (PPAF) are fractures of the acetabulum with a hip endoprosthesis in place. They are a rare complication, although they are occurring more frequently due to the increase in patients being fitted with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the long service life of the implants. At present, only a small amount of scientific literature exists, particularly regarding the surgical treatment of these fracture types.The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the topic of PPAF with a critical review of the current literature and to present the necessary surgical treatment.An evaluation of the current literature on the topic of PPAF with a focus on the surgical treatment of fractures is carried out.Surgical treatment is technically demanding due to the pelvic ring instability with removal of the bone tension for secure acetabular cup fixation and should lead to the recovery of the biomechanical stability of the pelvis and thus the secure anchoring of the acetabular cup. An interdisciplinary approach requiring both trauma surgery and orthopaedic expertise is certainly recommended, as older and comorbid patients with poor bone quality are particularly frequently affected.The treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures, especially in older patients, requires not only the individual expertise of surgeon involved in the operation but also a goal-oriented and consistent interdisciplinary approach by the surgeons involved from the fields of orthopaedics and trauma surgery in view of the patients' frequent comorbidities. By working together, the optimal and individualized operation can be performed for the patient.

Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Management and Functional Outcomes

PURPOSE

Intraoperative acetabular fracture (IAF) is a non-common complication of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite the prevalence of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures are increasing, little has been written about this type of fracture. The main objective is to analyze possible risk factors, treatment options and functional outcomes associated with IAF.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2020, 4 senior arthroplasty surgeons performed 5540 uncemented primary THA. We reviewed our Total Joint Registry and found 18 cases with an IAF. We analyzed demographic factors, medical history, preoperative diagnose, acetabular cups designs, anatomic location of the fracture, treatment, associated complications and functional outcomes. The minimum duration of follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

The prevalence of an IAF was 0,3%. All the acetabular cups were hemispherical modular. The most frequent acetabular cup associated with an IAF was the CSF Plus (JRI). In two cases the acetabular components were judged to be stable and no additional treatment was done. In the other sixteen patients, various surgical procedures were carried out. Almost 30% of patients that sustained an IAF had some complication during their follow up. Moreover, poor functionality outcomes were obtained (12.1 ± 4.1). in the final follow up accordance to Postel Merle d'Aubingé score.

CONCLUSION

Although IAF is a rare complication of THA, maintaining a high index of suspicion is important as they can be difficult to identify. Still with an adequate early treatment they have poor functionality and high risk of associated complications.

Outcomes Following Intraoperative Calcar Fractures During Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative calcar fractures (IOCFs) are an established complication of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prompt recognition and management may prevent subsequent postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and revision rates of THAs with IOCFs identified and managed intraoperatively.

METHODS

There were 11,438 primary cementless THAs performed at a single institution from 2009 to 2022. Prospectively collected data on cases with an IOCF was compared to cases without the complication. The fracture group had a lower body mass index (26.9 versus 28.9 kg/m2; P = .01). Patient age, sex, and mean follow-up (3.2 (0 to 12.8) versus 3.5 years (0 to 14); P = .45) were similar between groups.

RESULTS

An IOCF occurred in 62 of 11,438 (0.54%) cases. The THAs done via a direct anterior approach experienced the lowest rate of fractures (31 of 7,505, 0.4%) compared to postero-lateral (27 of 3,759, 0.7%; P = .03) and lateral (4 of 165, 2.4%; P < .01) approaches. Of the IOCFs, 48 of 62 (77%) were managed with cerclage cabling, 4 of 62 (6.5%) with intraoperative stem design change and cabling, 4 of 62 (6.5%) with restricted weight-bearing, and 6 of 62 (9.7%) with no modification to the standard postoperative protocol. The IOCF group experienced one case of postoperative component subsidence. No subjects in the IOCF cohort required revision, and rates were similar between groups (0 of 62, 0% versus 215 of 11,376, 1.9%; P = .63). Postoperative Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores were comparable (85.7 versus 86.4; P = .80).

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless THA complicated by IOCF had similar postoperative revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures at early follow-up when compared to patients not experiencing this complication. Surgeons may use these data to provide postoperative counseling on expectations and outcomes following these rare intraoperative events.

Three Differing Methods of Treating Intraoperative Nondisplaced Calcar Fractures Demonstrate Similar Radiographic Stem Subsidence

BACKGROUND

Several management strategies have been described to treat intraoperative calcar fractures during total hip arthroplasty (THA), including retaining the primary implant and utilizing cerclage cables (CCs) or switching the implant to one that bypasses the fracture and achieves diaphyseal fixation. However, the radiographic and clinical outcomes of these differing strategies have never been described and compared.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 50 patients who sustained an intraoperative calcar fracture out of 9,129 primary total hip arthroplasties (0.55%) performed by one of three surgeons between 2008 and 2022. Each of the three surgeons consistently employed a distinct strategy for the management of these fractures: retention of the primary metaphyseal-engaging implant and placement of CCs; exchange to a modular, tapered-fluted stem (MTF); or exchange to a fully-coated, diaphyseal-engaging stem (FC). Stem subsidence was then evaluated on standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs at three months and one year postoperatively. Postoperative medical and surgical complication rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of fifteen patients were treated with CC, 15 with MTF, and 20 with FC. At three-month follow-up, mean stem subsidence was 0.43 ± 0.08 mm, 1.47 ± 0.36 mm, and 0.68 ± 0.39 mm for CC, MTF, and FC cohorts, respectively (P = .323). At one-year, mean stem subsidence was 0.70 ± 0.08 mm, 1.74 ± 0.69 mm, and 1.88 ± 0.90 mm for the CC, MTF, and FC cohorts, respectively (P = .485). Medical complications included 2 venous thromboembolic events (4%) within 90 days of surgery. There were 6 reoperations (12%); 3 (6%) for acute periprosthetic joint infection (all within the FC cohort); 2 (4%) for postoperative periprosthetic fractures (one fracture distal to the stem in the FC cohort and one fracture at the level of the stem in the MTF cohort), and 1 (2%) closed reduction for instability (within the CC cohort).

CONCLUSIONS

The three described methods of managing intraoperative nondisplaced calcar fractures demonstrated little radiographic stem subsidence; however, the risk of reoperation was much higher than expected.

Mid-term to Long-term Outcomes and Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe forms of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in adulthood often lead to total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term to long-term outcomes of THA in Crowe type IV DDH cases, which represent a technically challenging and complex patient group.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for observational studies and case series with over 100 months of mean follow-up on adult patients who had Crowe type IV DDH treated with THA. A total of 3,710 records were initially identified, leading to the inclusion of 24 studies in the final analysis. These studies were subjected to quality assessment using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment tool. Various outcomes including revision rates, leg length discrepancy (LLD), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and complications like periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), dislocations, and nerve injuries were analyzed. A random effects model was employed for statistical analysis, with sensitivity analysis and meta-regression applied in cases of high heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The included studies assessed 1,024 hips with a mean follow-up of 11 years, revealing improvements in HHS and reductions in LLD post-THA. However, notable challenges were noted, including a 10.7% rate of intraoperative fractures, a 1.8% PJI rate, and a 5.8% dislocation rate. Osteolysis and aseptic loosening revisions were observed in 9.1 and 8% of cases, respectively. Heterotopic ossification (HO) occurred in 11.1% of patients. Nerve injury was reported in 4.2% of cases. With the use of meta-regression, some factors for observed heterogeneity were identified.

CONCLUSION

Total hip arthroplasty in Crowe type IV DDH patients presents notable challenges, but can lead to substantial long-term improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

What features of stem increase the risk of intraoperative femoral fracture during cementless primary hip arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Cementless fixation has become increasingly popular in hip arthroplasty due to its shorter operation time, easier technique, biologic fixation, and avoidance of bone cement implantation syndrome compared to cemented fixation. However, intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (IOPFx) is a disconcerting complication during cementless hip arthroplasty. Our purpose was to identify the features of cementless stem that increase the risk of IOPFx during primary hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all 4806 hip arthroplasties that was performed in a single institution from May 2003 to December 2020. Age at the index arthroplasty, sex, body mass index, physical status, ambulatory function, side of the operation, operational history, cause of the index arthroplasty, type of arthroplasty, surgical approach, surgeon, implant information, and events during the operation were investigated. The shoulder geometry and length of stem were also reviewed. The event of interest was narrowed down to IOPFx among various records of intraoperative events.

RESULTS

We found IOPFx of 2.6% among all the hips operated with cementless stem. In the multivariable analysis, female (OR = 1.52), childhood hip disease (OR = 2.30), stove-pipe femur (OR = 2.43), combined approach (OR = 2.60), and standard length of stem (OR = 1.59) were found to be significant risk factors of IOPFx.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, a stem with a standard length is significantly associated with risk of IOPFx compared to a shortened stem. These findings highlight the importance of careful consideration in terms of the risk of IOPFx when standard length cementless stem is chosen.

Cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 75 years: is it feasible?

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the indication for cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been widened to elderly patients as they might profit by the advantages of the short-curved implant design as well. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of a cementless short stem in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) compared to a young control group (≤ 60 years).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 316 THAs performed between 2014 and 2017 was prospectively examined. In all patients a cementless, curved short stem and press-fit cup (Fitmore® stem; Allofit®/-S cup; both ZimmerBiomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) were implanted via a minimally-invasive anterolateral approach. Clinical and radiological outcome as well as rate of complications and revision were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 292 patients have been included for analysis of complications and revisions (Øfollow-up: 4.5 years) and 208 patients for clinical and radiological outcome (Øfollow-up: 4.4 years). Complication rate was significantly increased in elderly patients (13.7% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.023), while the revision rate was increased without statistical significance (5.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.169). Periprosthetic fractures occurred significantly higher in the elderly patients (5.2% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.026). Both groups showed a comparable clinical outcome in the Harris Hip Score (93.7 vs. 91.9; p = 0.224), Oxford Hip Score (44.5 vs. 43.7; p = 0.350), Forgotten Joint Score (81.7 vs. 81.5; p = 0.952) and WOMAC (7.4 vs. 9.3; p = 0.334).

CONCLUSION

Cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty shows a comparable clinical and radiological outcome in patients over 75 years of age compared to younger patients under 60 years of age. However, cementless shorts stem THA shows an increased rate of overall complications and periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients over 75 years of age. Cemented fixation of the femoral component should be considered in patients over 75 years of age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Case-controlled study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Observational study without need for trial registration due to ICMJE criteria.

Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fracture - When is the Cerclage Enough?

BACKGROUND AND PLANNING

Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures are among the most serious complications in both primary and revision arthroplasty. They are often not detected, despite intraoperative radiological control. Since an unnoticed intraoperative fracture often requires revision surgery, which has been associated with increased mortality rates, intraoperative diagnosis and corresponding direct and sufficient treatment are crucial. There are patient-, surgery-, and implant-specific risk factors that increase the possibilities of intraoperative fractures. The most common risk factors on the patient side are age, gender, and various pre-existing conditions, such as osteoporosis or rheumatic diseases. A minimally invasive approach and a cementless press-fit fixation are the most significant surgery- and implant-specific risk factors. The Vancouver classification or the modified Mallory classification are available for the classification of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures. Based on these classifications, treatment recommendations can be derived. Different strategies are available for fracture management.

THERAPY

Generally, if the stem is stable, osteosynthesis can be performed with preservation of the implant. This procedure can be applied to the majority of cases with non-displaced fractures by using cerclages as fixation. An unstable implant may require replacement of the stem. In higher grade fractures, stabilisation by using plate osteosynthesis may be necessary. The aim is to achieve the most anatomical reposition possible for the best possible bony consolidation. The ultimate goal is high implant stability and restoration of the biomechanics.

Higher rates of intraoperative fractures with compaction broaching compared to conventional broaching during hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures

PURPOSE

Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (IPFF) is a known iatrogenic complication during hemiarthroplasty (HA) which may lead to inferior outcomes. The risk factors for IPFF during HA in displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) remains to be fully elucidated. This study aims to compare IPFF rates between compaction broaching and conventional broaching techniques for cementless HA in FNF.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed institutional surgical data of patients who underwent cementless HA for displaced FNF from January 2010 to January 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the broaching system: conventional broaching and compaction broaching. The presence, location, and treatment of IPFF were assessed for both groups. Effect of IPFF on postoperative weight-bearing status, mortality readmission and revision rates were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1,586 patients included in the study. 1252 patients (78.9%) in the conventional broaching group and 334 patients (21.1%) in the compaction broaching group. A total of 104 IPFF were found (6.5%). As compared to conventional broaching, compaction broaching was associated with significant higher IPFF rates (12.9% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001, OR 2.84, CI 1.88-4.30). The location of the IPFF was similar between groups (p = 0.366), as well as the intraoperative treatment (p = 0.103) and postoperative weight-bearing status (p = 0.640). Surgical time, mortality rates, readmission rates and revision rates were comparable between groups. In a multivariate regression analysis, compaction broaching (OR, 4.24; p < 0.001) was independently associated with IPFF.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals higher rates of IPFF associated with compaction broaching. Although this finding may have minimal clinical relevance, surgeons should consider these results when considering implant selection.

A Technique for Difficult Intraoperative Dislocation of Hip Prosthesis in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

There are instances where a patient's prosthetic hip is unable to be dislocated intraoperatively during a conversion or revision arthroplasty, despite scar removal and standard dislocation maneuvers. We describe a technique that involves an in situ disassociation of the femoral head component from the trunnion without the need for additional osteotomies. This maneuver may be beneficial in cases of protrusio, muscular stiffness, high soft tissue tension, arthrofibrosis, and ankylosis due to heterotopic ossification, as well as cases that involve a large femoral head or acetabular constraint. We also present a case of a 61-year-old male with a chronic prosthetic hip infection who underwent a two-stage revision surgery where this technique was utilized.

Vibratory insertion of press-fit acetabular components requires less force than a single blow technique

Aims

Periprosthetic fracture and implant loosening are two of the major reasons for revision surgery of cementless implants. Optimal implant fixation with minimal bone damage is challenging in this procedure. This pilot study investigates whether vibratory implant insertion is gentler compared to consecutive single blows for acetabular component implantation in a surrogate polyurethane (PU) model.

Methods

Acetabular components (cups) were implanted into 1 mm nominal under-sized cavities in PU foams (15 and 30 per cubic foot (PCF)) using a vibratory implant insertion device and an automated impaction device for single blows. The impaction force, remaining polar gap, and lever-out moment were measured and compared between the impaction methods.

Results

Impaction force was reduced by 89% and 53% for vibratory insertion in 15 and 30 PCF foams, respectively. Both methods positioned the component with polar gaps under 2 mm in 15 PCF foam. However, in 30 PCF foam, the vibratory insertion resulted in a clinically undesirable polar gap of over 2 mm. A higher lever-out moment was achieved with the consecutive single blow insertion by 42% in 15 PCF and 2.7 times higher in 30 PCF foam.

Conclusion

Vibratory implant insertion may lower periprosthetic fracture risk by reducing impaction forces, particularly in low-quality bone. Achieving implant seating using vibratory insertion requires adjustment of the nominal press-fit, especially in denser bone. Further preclinical testing on real bone tissue is necessary to assess whether its viscoelasticity in combination with an adjusted press-fit can compensate for the reduced primary stability after vibratory insertion observed in this study.

Management of Severe Bone Defects in Femoral Revision following Total Hip Arthroplasty

Treatment of femoral bone defects continues to be a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA); therefore, meticulous preoperative evaluation of patients and surgical planning are required. This review provides a concise synopsis of the etiology, classification, treatment strategy, and prosthesis selection in relation to femoral bone loss in revision THA. A search of literature was conducted for identification of research articles related to classification of bone loss, management of femoral revision, and comparison of different types of stems. Findings of a thorough review of the included articles were as follows: (1) the Paprosky classification system is used most often when defining femoral bone loss, (2) a primary-length fully coated monoblock femoral component is recommended for treatment of types I or II bone defects, (3) use of an extensively porouscoated stem and a modular fluted tapered stem is recommended for management of types III or IV bone defects, and (4) use of an impaction grafting technique is another option for improvement of bone stock, and allograft prosthesis composite and proximal femoral replacement can be applied by experienced surgeons, in selected cases, as a final salvage solution. Stems with a tapered design are gradually replacing components with a cylindrical design as the first choice for femoral revision; however, further confirmation regarding the advantages and disadvantages of modular and nonmodular stems will be required through conduct of higher-level comparative studies.

Management of Isolated Greater Trochanter Fractures Associated With Total Hip Arthroplasty

Periprosthetic hip fractures are recognized complications associated with total hip arthroplasty. Over the past decade, there has been a 2.5-fold increase in the incidence of periprosthetic fractures which is expected to grow exponentially in the future. Most of these fractures require surgical fixation or revision arthroplasty. Fractures of the greater trochanter represent a subset of periprosthetic fractures for which there is currently no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal management. The purpose of this review was to outline the management strategies available to address these fractures, with formulation of recommendations for fractures sustained intraoperatively, postoperatively, and in the setting of primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Incidence and outcomes of intraoperative periprosthetic acetabular fractures during cementless total hip arthroplasty: a prospective three-dimensional computer tomography-based study

PURPOSE

Unlike periprosthetic femoral fractures, periprosthetic acetabular fractures during total hip arthroplasty (THA) have not been evaluated in detail. We prospectively evaluated the incidence, patterns, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of intraoperative periprosthetic acetabular fractures using pre- and postoperative computer tomography (CT).

METHODS

In this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated 234 consecutive patients (250 hips) who underwent THA and three-dimensional CT before and after the surgery. We assessed the incidence, pattern of fractures, outcomes for each fracture pattern, reoperation and revision rates, Harris hip score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Multivariate regression models were used to identify risk factors for periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

RESULTS

In total, 43 periprosthetic acetabular fractures (17.2%) were identified via CT. Fractures occurred most frequently at the superolateral wall. Early cup migration occurred in three hips. None of the patients underwent revision surgery for acetabular loosening. Regression modeling showed that rheumatoid arthritis was a significant predictor of periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are not infrequent during cementless THA and are more common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Results of Utilizing Cerclage Wires in the Management of Intraoperative Vancouver B1 Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Retrospective Cohort Investigation into Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Due to an increase in total hip arthroplasties (THAs), the incidence of periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHFs) is forecast to rise considerably in the next decades, with Vancouver B1 fractures (VB1) accounting for one third of total cases. Femur fixation with cerclages (with or without screws) is considered the current treatment option for intraoperative VB1.

METHODS

The study retrospectively includes data from patients who developed VB1 PPHFs during THAs from 3 December 2020 to 30 November 2022. The primary outcome of this study was to identify the reintervention-free survival rate. The secondary aim was to determine clinical and radiographic assessment at follow-up, based on Harris hip score (HHS) and limb length discrepancy (LLD).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients with a mean age of 60.03 ± 15.49 (22 to 77) years old were included. Overall, the Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated a reoperation-free survival rate of 99% (CI 95%) at 6 months. The mean limb length discrepancy (LLD) improved from -3.69 ± 6.07 (range -27.9 to 2.08) mm to 0.10 ± 0.67 (range -1.07 to 1.20) mm. The mean HHS improved from 42.72 ± 14.37 (range 21.00-96.00) to 94.40 ± 10.32 (range 56.00-100.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The employment of cerclage wires represents an effective strategy for handling intraoperative VB1 fractures. Level III retrospective cohort study.

Does size matter? Outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty with long or primary stems: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Femoral reconstruction with long stems is widely accepted as the standard in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). However, long stems can be technically challenging to insert and can compromise bone stock for future revision. This study aimed to identify whether there was a difference in outcomes with using a long versus primary or short femoral stem in revision.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles comparing long and primary stem length in rTHA for Paprosky 1-3B femoral defects. The primary outcome measure was the reoperation rate after rTHA. Secondary outcomes included infection and dislocation rates, periprosthetic fracture, loosening, mortality, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

RESULTS

The results of 3,102 rTHAs performed in 2,982 patients were reported from 9 eligible studies in the systematic review, of which 6 were included in the meta-analysis. The mean patient age was 67.4 and the mean follow-up lasted 5 years (range, 1-15 years). There was no significant difference in the reoperation rate (odds ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-2.17, P = 0.63). Similarly, there was no significant difference in dislocation or periprosthetic fracture risk. Harris Hip Score was better with primary stems by a mean difference of 14.4 points (P < 0.05). Pooled 5-year stem-related survival was 91.3% ± 3.5% (SD) for primary stems and 89.9% ± 6.7% (SD) for long stems.

CONCLUSIONS

A primary stem provided non-inferior outcomes compared with long stems in rTHA with Paprosky type 1-3B femoral defects. Primary stems may yield a more straightforward technique and preserve distal bone stock for future revision particularly in younger patients. In older patients with lower functional demands and who would benefit from a decreased risk of complications, a long cemented stem is recommended.

Treatment of Intraoperative Trochanteric Fractures During Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intraoperative trochanteric fractures during primary and revision total hip arthroplasty typically occur during femoral canal preparation and component placement. Several fixation strategies, including wires, cables, cable grips, and plating, are available for fracture fixation. Surgeons should consider patient activity level preoperatively, bone mineral density, and fracture morphology when deciding on fixation strategies. Patient activity must be modified postoperatively to prevent fracture displacement and additional complications. Patients must be counseled postoperatively about the possibility of decreased clinical outcomes.

Management of Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intraoperative fractures of the acetabulum are a rare but serious complication during total hip arthroplasty. Acute fractures generally require attention with plating, whereas chronic acetabular fractures may be approached with distraction, a Burch-Schneider cage, or a custom implant. It is imperative for arthroplasty surgeons to possess a thorough understanding of how to identify and manage these injuries. Collaborating with an orthopedic traumatologist for assistance with plating the anterior or posterior column, if necessary, can be invaluable. Management options encompass conservative management, revision style acetabular component, screw/plating of anterior/posterior column, and the use of a larger cup with multiple screw augmentation options.

Association of osteoporosis and high serum homocysteine levels with intraoperative periprosthetic fracture during total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-score matching analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture, one of the most frequent complications of total hip arthroplasty, is a very important factor that affects rehabilitation, hospitalization time, and cost of treatment. Osteoporosis is common in total hip arthroplasty patients and likely contributes to the increasing incidence of periprosthetic fracture. Despite this awareness, preoperative and postoperative osteoporosis evaluations remain insufficient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between the occurrence of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures and both bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis-related biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included a total of consecutive 487 hip joints of patients with a mean age of 65.5 ± 11.8 years who underwent total hip arthroplasty between July 2017 and December 2020. Patients with low BMD defined as T-score < -1.0 versus those with normal BMD were matched by a 1:1 propensity score to balance for patient baseline characteristics, and outcome was analyzed by a modified Poisson regression model. Our primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic fracture during surgery. We also investigated the effect modification of osteoporosis-related biomarkers, including tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b), total procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (total P1-NP), intact parathyroid hormone (intact PTH), and homocysteine, on osteoporosis and outcomes.

RESULTS

After matching, 250 patients were analyzed. The risk of fracture was significantly higher in patients with low BMD than in normal BMD patients (Incidence rate ratio 5.00 [95% CI 1.11-22.43], p = 0.036). We also observed significant effect of high serum homocysteine on the occurrence of intraoperative fractures (Incidence rate ratio 8.38 × 106 [95% C; 3.44 × 106-2.01 × 107], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative osteoporosis and high serum homocysteine levels were risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, A single-center retrospective study.

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures as a complication of total hip arthroplasty

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but potentially devastating complications of total hip arthroplasty. As the number of total hip arthroplasties performed annually increases, so has the incidence of periprosthetic fractures, with the topic being spotlighted more frequently in the orthopaedic community. There is a particular sparsity of literature regarding periprosthetic acetabular fractures, with periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty being traditionally far more commonly reported. This article aims to provide an up-to-date review of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, classifications, and management strategies for periprosthetic acetabular fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

The use of a standard-length conical tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty to address Paprosky type I-II femoral defects: a prospective study of 87 patients

INTRODUCTION

Low-grade femoral defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) might be preferably treated with a primary implant. Almost no previous study reported the use of standard-length conical tapered (SLCT) stems in these cases. We analyzed a series of cases using a SLCT stem in rTHA with Paprosky type I-II femoral defects. The purpose of the study was to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes in this series of rTHA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively followed 87 patients undergoing a femoral component rTHA: 53 Paprosky type I and 34 type II femoral defects. Patient-reported measures (Oxford Hip Score, EQ-5D, VAS pain during rest and activity) were administered at baseline, 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Radiographic subsidence overtime was scored. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the subsidence over time, the complication-free survival, and the implant survivorship with reoperation and stem revision as endpoints.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 72.5 (SD ± 23.9) months. All PROMs significatively improved over time. The average subsidence was 2.8 (SD ± 3.2), 3.6 (SD ± 4.4), and 4.0 (SD ± 4.9) mm at 4, 12, and 24 months respectively. 6 stems had subsidence > 10 mm. The survival without complication was 0.85 (95% CI 0.94-0.77), while the implant survival without reoperation was 0.83 (95% CI 0.95-0.72). The overall stem survival rate was 93.7% (95% CI 0.91-0.97) at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

The use of a SLCT stem in rTHA with Paprosky type I-II femoral defects demonstrated good survival with low subsidence rates during the first 2 years after surgery. Surgeons should consider the use of this primary prosthesis as a potential treatment during stem revision in cases with limited femoral bone loss.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Fracture-Related Infection After Peri-Prosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (TRON Group Study)

Background: Fracture-related infection (FRI) sometimes occurs with peri-prosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) treatment. Fracture-related infection often leads to multiple re-operations, possible non-union, a decreased clinical function, and long-term antibiotic treatment. In this multicenter study, we aimed to clarify the incidence of FRI, the causative organisms of wound infection, and the risk factors associated with post-operative infection for PPF. Patients and Methods: Among 197 patients diagnosed with peri-prosthetic femoral fracture who received surgical treatment in 11 institutions (named the TRON group) from 2010 to 2019, 163 patients were included as subjects. Thirty-four patients were excluded because of insufficient follow-up (less than six months) or data loss. We extracted the following risk factors for FRI: gender, body mass index, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, chronic hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, dialysis, history of osteoporosis treatment, injury mechanism (high- or low-energy), Vancouver type, and operative information (waiting period for surgery, operation time, amount of blood loss, and surgical procedure). We conducted a logistic regression analysis to investigate the risk factors for FRI using these extracted items as explanatory variables and the presence or absence of FRI as the response variable. Results: Fracture-related infection occurred after surgery for PPF in 12 of 163 patients (7.3%). The most common causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7). The univariable analysis showed differences for dialysis (p = 0.001), Vancouver type (p = 0.036), blood loss during surgery (p = 0.001), and operative time (p = 0.001). The multivariable logistic-regression analysis revealed that the patient background factor of dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 22.9; p = 0.0005), and the operative factor of Vancouver type A fracture (OR, 0.039-1.18; p = 0.018-0.19) were risk factors for FRI. Conclusions: The rate of post-operative wound infection in patients with a PPF was 7.3%. Staphylococcus was the most frequent causative organism. The surgeon should pay attention to infection after surgery for patients with Vancouver type A fractures and those undergoing dialysis.

Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Short Versus Straight Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies indicate a decreased risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) for short compared to straight stems. However, the results are still inconclusive. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the rate of PFFs within the first year between cementless short and straight stem THA.

METHODS

A 1:1 propensity score matching of 3,053 THAs was performed. Two groups including 1,147 short stem THAs implanted through a minimally invasive antero-lateral approach and 1,147 straight stem THAs implanted through a transgluteal Hardinge approach were matched. The rates of PFFs and fracture patterns were compared between both stem types. Risk factors for PFFs were analyzed by multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

The overall rate of PFFs was 1.7% in short stem THA and 3.2% in straight stem THA (P = .015). Postoperatively detected Vancouver A fractures occurred significantly more often in straight stem THA (P = .002), while the occurrence Vancouver B fractures did not differ significantly (P = .563). The risk of PFFs was significantly increased for women in straight stem THA (Odds ratio (OR) 2.620; Confidence Interval (CI) 1.172-5.856; P = .019). Increasing age showed a significantly increased odds ratio in short stem (OR 1.103; CI 1.041-1.169, P < .001) and straight stem THA (OR 1.057; CI 1.014-1.101, P = .008).

CONCLUSION

Short stem THA reduces Vancouver Type A PFFs in the trochanteric region compared to straight stem THA, while Vancouver Type B fractures are comparable. Increasing age is a significant risk factor for both stem types, while the risk for PFFs in women was only significantly increased in the straight stem group.

[Periprosthetic acetabular fractures and defects : Trauma meets ortho]

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are considered to be a severe and challenging complication in total hip arthroplasty. To date, there are no internationally applicable standardized recommendations which can assist orthopedic surgeons and trauma surgeons in the treatment of patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to report on the current state of knowledge on periprosthetic acetabular fractures, to present the commonly used classification systems and to demonstrate appropriate treatment algorithms together with personal experiences.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selective search of the existing literature was carried out and the commonly used classification systems and treatment options for periprosthetic acetabular fractures were compiled and are discussed in relation to the in-house cases.

RESULTS

The comparison of the classification systems showed that frequently only fractures which have a purely traumatic origin are included among periprosthetic acetabular fractures. Insufficiency fractures within the framework of acetabular defects, which also belong to the group of acetabular fractures, are frequently included in revision arthroplasty. The management of defects with appropriate implants represents a challenge. By the combination of osteosynthesis and implant replacement, the selection of implants can often be de-escalated.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures represent a complex operation for both trauma surgeons and for specially trained orthopedic surgeons, which necessitate a high level of expertise. By the cooperation between trauma surgeons and orthopedic surgeons good treatment results can be achieved and recommendations for the selection of implants can be made.

Undetected Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

Periprosthetic fracture in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be catastrophic, and early detection and appropriate management are vital to the overall prognosis. This study aimed to describe and summarize the features of undetected intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IPFFs) in primary THA patients and treatment measures and to review the relevant literature.

METHODS

We reviewed a total of 6350 primary THAs performed at our institution between January 2013 and December 2020 and screened all IPFFs. Of 138 IPFFs, 24 were undetected and met the inclusion criteria. We recorded and compared basic patient and operative information and measured some parameters to evaluate canal morphologies based on preoperative radiographs. We also compared fracture line characteristics using postoperative radiographs to summarize the features of intraoperative fractures and propose treatment strategies. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the normality of the variable distributions. Measured parameters in all groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and compared using Dunnett's test. The χ² and Fisher exact tests were used to compare reoperation rates across the groups. Interrater and intrarater reliability were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Among the 24 hips, there was no significant difference in patient demographics, basic operative information or morphology. The incidence of IPFFs in primary THA patients was 2.17%, and up to 17.4% of IPFFs were undetected until postoperative fluoroscopy. The incidence of undetected IPFFs among all primary THA patients was 0.38% and varied by stem type, with the highest incidence in femurs with either anatomical (1.04%, 4/385) or modular stems (0.90%, 9/1003). Femurs with anatomical stems had a higher reoperation rate. The distal periprosthetic (Gruen zone 4) fracture line of femurs with tapered stems was more prone to involve the medial or lateral bone cortex, which could cause instability.

CONCLUSION

An undetected IPFF is most likely in femurs fitted with a prosthesis of an inappropriate size or type. Anatomical stems will most likely cause unstable fractures; thus, it is recommended to use them with caution and note the possibility of medial distal femoral fracture. Improper modular stem type or size selection results in longitudinal fractures of the distal femur, and prophylactic cerclage wire binding is recommended in dysplastic hips. Incorrect use of tapered stems in well-ossified femurs may cause distal femoral fractures involving the medial or lateral bone cortex. Intraoperative fluoroscopy after implantation may help detect hidden fractures.

Cementless primary or revision stem in revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect?

BACKGROUND

The use of primary or revision stem during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent revision THA with a primary or revision stem.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 78 patients who received revision THA for aseptic stem loosening using primary (N = 28) or revision stems (N = 50). The bone defects were classified as Paprosky type I or II. The mean follow-up duration was 72.3 ± 34.7 months. The primary outcome domains included surgical complications and implant failures. The secondary outcome domains included medical complications, 30- and 90-day readmission, and Harris hip score (HHS).

RESULTS

The use of revision stem was associated with a higher incidence than primary stem of patient complications (60.0% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.018), including intraoperative femur fracture (28.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.029) and greater trochanter fracture (16.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.045). The implant survival rate was comparable between groups. HHS at the final follow-up was similar.

CONCLUSION

With a lower risk of surgical complications and a similar rate of mid-term implant survival, cementless primary stem appears superior to revision stem in revision THA for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect.

Stay Short or Go Long in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paprosky Type II Femoral Defects: A Comparative Study With the Use of an Uncemented Distal Fixating Modular Stem and a Primary Monobloc Conical Stem With 5-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

In the revisions for Paprosky type II femoral defects, diaphyseal fixating femoral stems are commonly used. To preserve bone stock, the use of a shorter primary conical stem could be an adequate alternative. The objective of this study is to compare the results of a primary conical stem to the more commonly used diaphyseal fixating modular revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty surgery with Paprosky type II femoral defects.

METHODS

A total of 59 consecutive patients with Paprosky type II femoral defects from our prospective revision registry were included. Thirty patients who received a long distal fixating modular stem (Revision Stem, Lima Corporate) and 29 patients who received a primary conical short stem (Wagner Cone, Zimmer) were prospectively followed. Minimal follow-up time was 2 years for subsidence and patient-reported outcome measures and 5 years for complications, reoperation, and revision. We compared subsidence, perioperative complications, reoperations, femoral component survival, Oxford Hip Score, EuroQol 5 Dimension, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, and VAS for pain during activity between stems.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable regarding demographic, clinical, and surgery-related characteristics. We found more perioperative complications and stem revisions with the modular revision stem than with the primary conical stem. There were no statistical differences in subsidence, EuroQol 5 Dimension, Oxford Hip Score, and VAS for pain at rest or during activity between both stems.

CONCLUSION

In revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type II femoral defects, uncemented primary monobloc conical femoral stems showed the same clinical result as distal fixating modular stems with fewer complications and fewer stem revisions.

Revision of a Failed Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty following Excessive Reaming with a Medial Cup Protrusion

Background and Objectives: Atraumatic intrapelvic protrusion of the acetabular component following excessive reaming of the acetabulum with a far medial positioning of the cup is a rare, but serious complication of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study analyzes the factors contributing to this uncommon complication and presents the outcome after the revision surgery using the Ganz reinforcement ring combined with a bone graft and plating of the posterior column and/or screws for the anterior column. Materials and Methods: A retrospective case series study with seven patients (four males, mean age 76 ± 10 years (60−86)) that underwent a revision THA within 24 ± 17 days (5−60) after an atraumatic periprosthetic acetabular fracture with a medial cup protrusion was performed. All fractures were reconstructed with a Ganz reinforcement ring and bone graft with a mean follow-up of 1.7 ± 1.7 years (0.5−5). Radiographs were evaluated for the following: (i) cup positioning immediately after the primary THA and the revision surgery, (ii) cup migration in the follow-up, and (iii) fracture healing. Results: The position of the acetabular component as assessed on the postoperative radiographs after the index surgery and before the complete medial cup protrusion showed a cup placement beyond the ilioischial line indicative of a fracture of the medial wall. The revision surgery with the reconstruction of the medial wall with a Ganz reinforcement ring combined with a bone graft restored in the presented cases the center of rotation in the horizontal direction with a statistical significance (p < 0.05). During the follow-up, there was no aseptic loosening with the relevant cup migration or significant change in the position of the acetabular cup at the final follow-up (p > 0.05) after the revision. All seven fractures and bone grafts realized a bone union until the latest follow-up. Conclusions: Following excessive reaming, the acetabular component was placed too far medially and resulted in an intrapelvic cup protrusion. An unstable cup following a fracture of the medial wall was evident on the immediate postoperative radiographs. In the case of the medial wall perforation with an intrapelvic cup protrusion after the primary THA, the reconstruction with a Ganz reinforcement ring was a successful treatment option resulting in the fracture healing and a stable cup positioning. Surgeons should be aware of that rare and probably underreported complication and restore the anatomic center of rotation by treating the defect intraoperatively.

Management of Periprosthetic Acetabular Fractures: A Critical Analysis and Review of the Literature

➢

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are uncommon and infrequently the focus of studies.

➢

Acetabular fractures are occasionally recognized postoperatively when patients report unremitting groin pain weeks after surgery.

➢

The widespread use of cementless acetabular cups might lead to a higher number of fractures than are clinically detectable.

➢

Appropriate recognition, including mindfulness of preoperative patient and surgical risk factors, is critical to the successful management of acetabular complications.

The insidious risk of periprosthetic fracture in clinically functional total hip arthroplasties: A biomechanical study of willed joints

Femoral bone quality is a major risk factor of periprosthetic fracture after total hip arthroplasty (THA), which has mortality similar to native hip fractures but higher short-term morbidity. The goal of this study was to quantify cortical strains at the site of expected Vancouver Type-B periprosthetic fracture as a function of bone mineral density, femoral stem material, and fixation method using a series of 29 autopsy-retrieved, clinically asymptomatic hip joints with THA. Periprosthetic bone mineral content and density was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry by Gruen Zone. Specimens then underwent combined cyclic axial and torsional loading, increasing incrementally from 100 N and ±1 Nm to peaks of 700 N and ±5 Nm. All specimens experienced significantly higher strains on the lateral surface than on the anterior surface, indicating that the bending loads in the frontal plane, rather than axial/torsional loads, had the predominant effect. Multiple significant relationships (p = 0.04, p = 0.02) were found between predicted periprosthetic strains calculated from radiographic measurements and observed principal strains. Though THA in the present study were in successful clinical service, the produced results indicated that some femurs with rigid cemented or noncemented implants were potentially at high risk for Vancouver Type-B fractures, which may be predicted radiographically.

Effectiveness of prophylactic double-looped wiring in cementless Hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical study in osteoporotic bone model using impaction simulation system

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is well-known complication in cementless hip arthroplasty (HA), especially in the elderly with osteoporosis. To prevent intraoperative PFFs during HA, prophylactic cerclage wiring on the calcar area during femoral broaching and implant insertion is recommended. However, biomechanical data on the benefits of cerclage wiring in osteoporotic bone during impaction are limited and controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic double-looped cerclage wiring (PDLCW) during femoral broaching in the osteoporotic bone model with an impaction simulation system.

METHODS

Fifteen osteoporotic femur models were prepared and allocated to three groups; control group (no cerclage), PW group (received PDLCW), and CC+PW group (prepared as having calcar crack and received PDLCW). All femurs were broached under impaction force that sequentially increased until the visible fracture or calcar crack propagation was visible. The primary outcomes were mallet impaction force (MIF-CF) and mallet velocity (MV-CF) at the time of calcar fracture. The secondary outcomes were calcar fracture pattern and subsidence during calcar fracture (S-CF).

RESULTS

PW group showed a significant increase in average MIF-CF, by 40.4% and 120.2% (p<0.001) compared to the control and CC+PW groups, respectively. The average MV-CF in PW group was also significantly greater, 13.1% and 64.6% (p<0.001), compared to the control and CC+PW groups, respectively. Control group revealed significantly greater incidence of complete calcar fracture (60% vs. 0% vs. 0%, p = 0.024), and the highest S-CF compared to those in the PW and CC+PW groups (10.6 ± 6.0 mm, 6.7 ± 4.4 mm, and 1.3 ± 2.0 mm, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that PDLCW significantly improved hoop stress resistance by increasing the calcar fracture threshold related to mallet impaction, decreasing the risk of complete calcar fracture.

Treatment Algorithm of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracturens

Introduction. The ever-expanding indications for total hip arthroplasty are leading to more implants being placed in younger as well as in older patients with high functional demand. Also, prolonged life expectancy is contributing to an overall increment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. The Vancouver classification has been the most used for guiding the surgeon choice since its proposal in 1995. Fractures occurring over a hip femoral implant can be divided into intra-operative and post-operative PFFs, and their treatment depends on factors that may severely affect the outcome: level of fracture, implant stability, quality of bone stock, patients' functional demand, age and comorbidities, and surgeon expertise. There are many different treatment techniques available which include osteosynthesis and revision surgery or a combination of both. The goals of surgical treatment are patients' early mobilization, restoration of anatomical alignment and length with a stable prosthesis and maintenance of bone stock. Significance. The aim of this review is to describe the state-of-the-art treatment and outcomes in the management of PFFs. We performed a systematic literature review of studies reporting on the management of PFFs around hip stems and inter-prosthetic fractures identifying 45 manuscripts eligible for the analysis. Conclusions. PFFs present peculiar characteristic that must be considered and special features that must be addressed. Their management is complex due to the extreme variability of stem designs, the possibility of having cemented or uncemented stems, the difficulty in identifying the "real" level of the fracture and the actual stability of the stem. As a result, the definition of a standardized treatment is unlikely, thereby high expertise is fundamental for the surgical management of PPFs, so this kind of fractures should be treated only in specialized centres with both high volume of revision joint arthroplasty and trauma surgery.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Primary Stem or Full-Porous-Coated Long Stem for Aseptic Femoral Component Loosening: A Matched-Pair Study

Background

Revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) for loosening the femoral stem is a technical challenge. Distally fixed, full-porous-coated long stems are widely accepted as the standard selection for these revisions. However, the success of primary stems in RTHA is not well known.

Methods

This study enrolled 24 patients with aseptic loosening of the femoral stem who underwent RTHA using primary stems. Another 72 patients with aseptic loosening who underwent RTHA using full-porous-coated long stems were matched in terms of operation date, proximal femoral bone stock (Paprosky classification), sex, and age. The primary and secondary outcomes of failure were the need for revision for any reason and the radiographic change in the stem respectively.

Results

In the primary stem group, one patient had a periprosthetic fracture and received a second RTHA 2 years after the previous one. The primary outcome’s 5-and 10-year survival rates were both 95.8%. For the matched comparison group, one patient had an immediate periprosthetic fracture of the femoral shaft requiring further open reduction internal fixation surgery. Another patient had a full-porous-coated long stem breakage 6 years postoperatively, which required a second RTHA. The primary outcome’s 5-and 10-year survival rates were 98.6% and 97.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Primary stems can achieve non-inferior clinical success compared to a full-porous-coated long stem for aseptic stem loosening RTHA in patients with adequate proximal femoral bone stock.

Occult periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum in THA using an elliptic cup design have no adverse impact on outcome

Occult periprosthetic fractures have been defined as a fracture only visible on postoperative CT scans but not on postoperative plain radiography after an uneventful surgery without intraoperative fracture. The fracture rate for hemispherical and peripheral self-locking cups has been described as 8.4%. We retrospectively analyzed postoperative CT scans after primary THA to clear the question whether such occult periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum require particular treatment strategy. Between 2014 and 2018 we identified 115 CT scans of 114 patients after primary cementless THA with elliptical cups using a direct anterior approach. The CT scans were obtained as part of other investigations. Localization of the fracture, patients demographics, clinical (WOMAC, Harris Hip Score) and radiological outcome were analyzed. Fracture and non-Fracture group were compared with regard to demographics and short-term outcome after 1 year. Four occult fractures (3.5%) were identified. Three fractures involved the posterior wall. All patients had an uneventful routine postoperative rehabilitation. Patients with occult fractures showed similar post- operative HHS and WOMAC scores at 3 (HHS p = 0.576, WOMAC p = 0.128) and 12 (HHS p = 0.479, WOMAC p = 0.588) months. There were no cup loosening nor radiolucent lines at latest follow-up (mean FU 22 months, range 12-34 months). Clinical and radiological short-term outcome was not impaired by the occurrence of an occult periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum. The incidental detection of an occult periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum does not seem to oblige the surgeon to adapt the postoperative regime.

Bilateral multiple periprosthetic hip fractures and joint dislocations secondary to general convulsive seizures

Background

During a seizure, there is a powerful and forceful contraction of muscles which may lead to fractures or joint dislocations. However, multiple periprosthetic hip fractures and joint dislocations secondary to seizures have not been reported.

Case presentation

A 49-year-old male developed spontaneous and bilateral multiple periprosthetic hip fractures and joint dislocations (including displaced fracture of the proximal right femur, avulsion fracture of the left lesser trochanter, left acetabular fracture and bilateral joint dislocations) secondary to generalized convulsive seizures which occurred within few hours after bilateral total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Bilateral open reconstruction and fixation were performed on the 21st day after primary THAs and on 2-year follow-up, the patient showed satisfactory functional outcome.

Conclusions

Multiple periprosthetic hip fractures and joint dislocations secondary to seizure are extremely rare, and treatment targets for these injuries should focus on fracture healing and limb function recovery. Craniocerebral operation could bring an elevated risk of seizure; meanwhile, subsequent corticosteroid replacement threapy was complicated by secondary osteoporosis. Therefore, anti-osteoporotic and anti-epileptic therapy should be considered in this type of patients to avoid fracture and dislocation after arthroplasty.

Cement-in-cement technique of the femoral component in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision: A systematic review of the contemporary literature

Background

Clinical outcomes of cemented femoral stems revisions using the cement-in-cement technique in aseptic conditions after total hip arthroplasty have been widely described.

Methods

The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried.

Results

Twelve articles were included (620 revision THA). Revision rate for complications related to the femoral side was 1.4% at mid-term follow-up (5.4 years). Periprosthetic femoral fracture rate was 1.1%, aseptic loosening of the femoral component 0.3%.

Conclusions

Cement-in-cement revision technique of the femoral component is associated with a high mid-term success rates (98.6%) and is potentially less challenging than other revision techniques.

Radiographic Evaluation of Proximal Femoral Nutrient Arteries After Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Short Femoral Stem

BACKGROUND

The use of less invasive approaches and broach only press-fit femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may increase the risk for periprosthetic fracture. Proximal femoral nutrient arteries (FNAs) can be mistaken for fractures after THA. Description of FNAs in relation to THA implants is important to better distinguish between FNAs and periprosthetic fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency, location, and morphology of FNAs visible on radiographs after primary THA with a broach-only stem design.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients ≥18 years who underwent primary THA with a cementless, broach-only stem, and had 6-week follow-up radiographs were included. Patient demographics were recorded. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 6 weeks postoperatively were assessed for the presence of FNA; if present, measurements of vessel location and morphology were obtained. Descriptive statistics were reported. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient characteristics associated with the radiographic presence of perforating vessel.

RESULTS

A total of 378 hips were evaluated (332 patients). FNAs were identified radiographically in 46.3% (175 hips/378 hips). All FNAs were found to be unicortical, most observed in the posterior and lateral cortices. Gender, age, BMI, stem position, and surgical approach did not correlate with a presence of FNA on radiograph.

CONCLUSION

FNA was seen on postoperative radiographs in 46% of patients after THA with one broach-only stem design. The FNA was unicortical and present on preoperative radiographs. Surgeons should consider this when evaluating postoperative radiographs.

Diagnosis and Management of Intraoperative Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures are challenging complications that may affect implant stability and survivorship. Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are uncommon and infrequently are the focus of studies. Acetabular fractures are occasionally recognized after patients report unremitting groin pain weeks postoperatively. The widespread use of cementless acetabular cups might lead to higher number of fractures than is clinically detectable. Conversely, the incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures are more common and encompass a broad spectrum, ranging from a small cortical perforation to displaced fractures with an unstable prosthesis. Appropriate recognition, including mindfulness of preoperative patient and surgical risk factors, is critical to the successful management of acetabular and femoral complications. This comprehensive review article focuses on the incidence, patient and surgical risk factors, diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes associated with intraoperative acetabular and femur fractures in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Multiple failures of internal fixation for treatment of periprosthetic femoral refracture: a case report and literature review

We herein report a case involving three failures of internal fixation after periprosthetic femoral fracture (Vancouver type B1). The patient had low bone mass (T-score of −1.7) and was overweight (body mass index of 28.7 kg/m²) but had no sign of femoral stem loosening. The first open reduction with internal fixation was performed according to the recommended treatment. Unexpectedly, three treatment failures subsequently occurred, after which the patient finally attained endurable walking activity. A literature review indicated that the intrinsic biomechanical problems of Vancouver B1 fractures have not been thoroughly addressed. Choosing the correct surgical strategy for Vancouver B1 fractures is essential to avoid complications and ensure healing. A sufficient locking plate and cable system should be used after the first failure if revision was not performed the first time.

Comparison of different fixation techniques for periprosthetic fractures: a biomechanical study of a new implant

INTRODUCTION

The ideal treatment method for periprosthetic fractures is controversial due to the risks of current methods. Single-cortex screw fixation in prosthesis may lead to implant failure. Therefore, we aimed to develop an implant that lowers the risk for complications. For this study, we designed and tested two new implant models. The first model was a plate with a combination of U nails and cerclage holes. The second model was a U nail plate with a screw, which combines a plate screw with U nail (staples). Our study aimed to compare the stability of two newly designed implants with classical treatment modalities. We used 27 (in 3 groups) artificial bone models and 9 different test models.

METHODS

The ISO 7206-4:2010 (E) standards were used for 27 bones in nine groups tested under laboratory conditions. In our study, we examined nine different groups. In group 1, hip the prosthesis was extracted, and a revision femoral stem was embedded. In group 2, periprosthetic fractures were repaired with a plate and cable. In group 3, periprosthetic fractures were repaired with a plate and stapler. In group 4, periprosthetic fractures were repaired with a plate and stapler cable. In group 5, periprosthetic fractures were repaired with a plate stapler and screw. Groups 6 and 7 were the control groups. Group 6 was the only artificial bone group, and group 7 was the prosthesis embedded bone group. Group 8 was periprosthetic fractures treated with unicortical screw fixation with cerclage, and group 9 was periprosthetic fractures treated with unicortical screw fixation. Axial loading was applied to the bones. The yield strength of the system was determined by loading the synthetic bone models with a constant compression speed of 5 mm/min through the centre of motion using the Geratech SH 2000 testing system. During the tests, load and displacement values were recorded, and the stiffness of the models was calculated based on those values.

RESULTS

According to our results, the greatest durability was found in the revision hip prosthesis group (1511 N), and the weakest performance was found in the plate with the stapler implant group (163N). When comparing the data of groups according to compression, significant differences were found in group 2 with groups 1, 4, 5, and 7; group 3 with group 1; group 8 with groups 1 and 5; and group 9 with 1, 5, 7, and according to breakage, significant differences were found in group2 with groups 1, 3, 5, and 7; group 3 with group 1; group 8 with groups 1 and 5; and group 9 with groups 1, 5, and 7 (p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

The revision hip prosthesis treatment for periprosthetic fractures showed the best performance, followed by the plate with stapler screw. In older patients, U nail-augmented implants may be a good alternative for periprosthetic fractures. Unicortical screw and cerclage wire combination fixation results were unsatisfactory results in this study.

CONCLUSION

This is an experimental study, so further studies, especially patient-specific studies, should be made to expand the findings of this study.

Periprosthetic occult acetabular fracture: an unknown side effect of press-fit techniques in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study sought to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of periprosthetic occult acetabular fracture occurring during cementless acetabular cup insertion in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to assess the clinical consequences of these fractures.

METHODS

A total of 232 hips (n = 205 patients) were included in this study. A periprosthetic occult acetabular fracture was defined as that which was unrecognised intraoperatively and was undetectable on post-operative radiographs yet was successfully diagnosed on post-operative computed tomography (CT) images. Clinical (age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative diagnosis) and surgical (additional screw fixation, cup rim size, and cup type) variables were analysed to identify risk factors for periprosthetic occult acetabular fracture.

RESULTS

Sixteen (6.9%) periprosthetic occult intraoperative acetabular fractures were identified. In addition, one (0.4%) periprosthetic acetabular fracture was found during operation. The superolateral wall (9/16 hips; 56.3%) was the most frequent location. In addition, one (0.4%) periprosthetic acetabular fracture was found during operation. Male sex was the only factor associated with an increased risk for periprosthetic occult intraoperative acetabular fracture (odds ratio for male versus female sex: 4.28; p = 0.04). There was no significant association between cup type and the occurrence of periprosthetic occult acetabular fracture. All 16 hips with periprosthetic occult intraoperative acetabular fracture were healed at the final follow-up visit without the requirement for any additional surgical interventions.

CONCLUSION

The results of the current study suggest that periprosthetic occult acetabular fractures are common during press-fit acetabular cup insertion in primary THA. Surgeons should have a high index of suspicion and early CT imaging referral in male patients who present with unexplained early post-operative groin pain in primary THA using cementless acetabular cups.

Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The increasing number of hip arthroplasties (HA), due to the growing elderly population, is associated with the risk of femoral periprosthetic fractures (FPFs). The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors for the development of FPFs after HA.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted in five data bases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Cinahl, ICTRP) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines up to May 2019, using the key words “risk factor,” “periprosthetic fracture,” and “hip replacement or arthroplasty.” Meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of HA and subgroup analysis based on the factors that were implicated in FPFs was performed.

Results

Sixteen studies were included (sample size: 599,551 HA patients, 4253 FPFs, incidence 0.71%). Risk factors statistically associated with increased incidence of FPFs were female gender (+ 40%), previous revision arthroplasty surgery (× 3 times), and the presence of rheumatoid arthritis (× 2.1 times), while osteoarthritis (− 57%), cement application (− 59%), and insertion of Biomet (− 68%) or Thompson’s prosthesis (− 75%) were correlated with low prevalence of FPFs. Obesity, cardiac diseases, advanced age, bad general health (ASA grade ≥ 3), and use of Exeter or Lubinus prosthesis were not linked to the appearance of FPFs.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggested that female gender, rheumatoid arthritis, and revision arthroplasty are major risk factors for the development of FPFs after a HA. In those patients, frequent follow-ups should be planned. Further prospective studies are necessary to clarify all the risk factors contributing to the appearance of FPFs after HA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-020-02152-0.

Periprosthetic hip fractures: an update into their management and clinical outcomes

The Vancouver classification is still a useful tool of communication and stratification of periprosthetic fractures, but besides the three parameters it considers, clinicians should also assess additional factors.

Combined advanced trauma and arthroplasty skills must be available in departments managing these complex injuries.

Preoperative confirmation of the THA (total hip arthroplasty) stability is sometimes challenging. The most reliable method remains intraoperative assessment during surgical exploration of the hip joint.

Certain B1 fractures will benefit from revision surgery, whilst some B2 fractures can be effectively managed with osteosynthesis, especially in frail patients.

Less invasive osteosynthesis, balanced plate–bone constructs, composite implant solutions, together with an appropriate reduction of the limb axis, rotation and length are critical for a successful fixation and uneventful fracture healing.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:75-92. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200050

Prevalence and Treatment of Osteoporosis Prior to Elective Shoulder Arthroplasty

Introduction:

The rate of preoperative osteoporosis in lower extremity arthroplasty is 33%. The prevalence of osteoporosis in shoulder arthroplasty patients is inadequately studied. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroplasty, (2) report the percentage of patients having dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) testing before surgery, and (3) determine the percentage of patients who have been prescribed osteoporosis medications within 6 months before or after surgery.

Methods:

This retrospective case series included all adults aged 50 years and older who underwent elective shoulder arthroplasty at a single tertiary care center over an 8-year period. National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria for screening and treatment were applied.

Results:

Two hundred fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria; 171 (68%) met the criteria for DEXA testing, but only 31 (12%) had this testing within 2 years preoperatively. Eighty patients (32%) met the NOF criteria for receipt of pharmacologic osteoporosis treatment, and 17/80 (21%) received a prescription for pharmacotherapy.

Discussion:

Two-thirds of elective shoulder arthroplasty patients meet the criteria to have bone mineral density measurement done, but less than 20% have this done. One in three elective shoulder arthroplasty patients meet the criteria to receive osteoporosis medications, but only 20% of these patients receive therapy.

Can custom 3D printed implants successfully reconstruct massive acetabular defects? A 3D-CT assessment

We report on the accuracy, measured with three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) postoperatively, in positioning custom 3D printed titanium components in patients with large acetabular defects. Twenty patients (13 females and 7 males) received custom-made acetabular implants between 2016 and 2018; the mean age was 66 years (SD = 11.6) and their mean body mass index was 28 (SD = 6.1). The median time to follow up was 25.5 months, range: 12 to 40 months. We describe a comparison method that uses the 3D models of CT-generated preoperative plans and the postoperative CT scans to quantify the discrepancy between planned and achieved component positions. Our primary outcome measures were the 3D-CT-measured difference between planned and achieved a component position in six degrees of freedom: center of rotation (CoR), component rotation, inclination (INC), and version (VER) of the cup. Our secondary outcome measures were: Oxford hip score, walking status, and complication rate. All components (100%) were positioned within 10 mm of planned CoR (in the three planes). Eighteen (95%) components were not rotated by more than 10° compared to the plan. Eleven (58%) components were positioned within 5° of planned cup angle (INC and VER). To date one complication has occurred, a periprosthetic fracture. This is the largest study in which postoperative 3D-CT measurements and clinical outcomes of custom-made acetabular components have been assessed. Accurate pre-op planning and the adoption of custom 3D printed implants show promising results in complex hip revision surgery.

Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease at King Fahad Hospital Hofuf: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background  Patients with avascular necrosis related to sickle cell disease (SCD) can be severely disabled by the severe degenerative changes of their hip. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains the only surgical option for some of these patients. Total hip arthroplasty can be a challenging procedure, and SCD patients demonstrate high percentages of medical, intraoperative, and postoperative complications and implant failure. Furthermore, the need for THA following avascular necrosis in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia is high, and the subsequent risk of periprosthetic fracture is prevalent. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct such a study. Aim of the study This cross-sectional retrospective study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors for periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty in sickle cell disease patients at King Fahad Hospital Hofuf, Saudi Arabia. Methods We collected the data of all SCD patients who had undergone THA during the study period, January 2015 to September 2020. Forty-nine SCD patients who had undergone THA during the study period were included. Patients who had undergone hip hemiarthroplasty, postoperative fractures, or had an indication of THA other than avascular necrosis were excluded. Surgeon factors, assistant factors, and surgical technique were also excluded. We then analyzed the data according to gender, age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, implant fixation type, avascular necrosis stage, proximal femoral morphology, Vancouver classification type, sickle cell type, preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level, and the risk of periprosthetic fractures. Descriptive statistics were presented using frequency and percentages for categorical variables, and continuous variables were summarized using means ± standard deviations. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were used to test for associations between categorical variables. At 0.05, the significance level was set. Results  Of the patients, 32.7% were male and 67.3% were female. 32.7% of the patients had advanced degenerative changes due to avascular necrosis. Among the patients, 20.4% had an intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture, 90% had a Vancouver classification class A, and 10% had a Vancouver classification class B1. According to Dorr classification, 75.5% were classified as Dorr A and 24.5% as Dorr B. Of the patients, 48 had an uncemented implant, and only 1 had cemented. The mean perioperative Hb was 9.02 + 2.02, with a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 14. No significant associations were found between the incidence of intraoperative femoral fracture and the demographic variables and the operative profile characteristics. However, a significantly higher rate of fracture was observed in patients operated on the right side compared to patients operated on the left side. Conclusion The prevalence of periprosthetic intraoperative fracture among SCD patients at King Fahad Hospital Hofuf was 20.4% during the study period. Even with adequate perioperative management, orthopedic surgeons must be prepared to deal with high rates of intraoperative fracture. No significant association was found between the incidence of intraoperative femoral fracture in SCD patients and the demographic variables and the operative profiles. However, a significantly higher rate of fracture was observed in patients operated on the right side compared to patients operated on the left side.

A Calcar Collar Is Protective Against Early Torsional/Spiral Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture: A Paired Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fracture is a leading reason for readmission following total hip arthroplasty. Most of these fractures occur during the early postoperative period before bone ingrowth. Before ingrowth occurs, the femoral component can rotate relative to the femoral canal, causing a spiral fracture pattern. We sought to evaluate, in a paired cadaver model, whether the torsional load to fracture was higher in collared stems. The hypothesis was that collared stems have greater load to fracture under axial and torsional loads compared with collarless stems.

METHODS

Twenty-two cadaveric femora (11 matched pairs) with a mean age of 77 ± 10.2 years (range, 54 to 90 years) were harvested. Following dissection, the femora were evaluated with use of a dual x-ray absorptiometry scanner and T scores were recorded. We utilized a common stem that is available with the same intraosseous geometry with and without a collar. For each pair, 1 femur was implanted with a collared stem and the contralateral femur was implanted with a collarless stem with use of a standard broaching technique. A compressive 68-kg load was applied to simulate body weight during ambulation. A rotational displacement was then applied until fracture occurred. Peak torque prior to fracture was measured with use of a torque meter load cell and data acquisition software.

RESULTS

The median torque to fracture was 65.4 Nm for collared stems and 43.1 Nm for uncollared stems (p = 0.0014, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The median T score was -1.95 (range, -4.1 to -0.15). The median difference in torque to fracture was 29.18 Nm. As expected in each case, the mode of failure was a spiral fracture around the implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Collared stems seemed to offer a protective effect in torsional loading in this biomechanical model comparing matched femora.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results may translate into a protective effect against early periprosthetic Vancouver B2 femoral fractures that occur before osseous integration has occurred.

The cement-in-cement technique is a reliable option in hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The cement-in-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty has many potential advantages and has recently gained widespread interest but still lacks evidence to support it. Our aim was to examine the surgical and patient-reported outcomes after cement-in-cement revision hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to February 2019 for original studies reporting the outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty surgeries using the cement-in-cement technique. The methodological quality was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies scale.

RESULTS

Sixteen non-comparative studies met the eligibility criteria, comprising 1899 hips in 1856 patients (72.2 mean age, 37% male), with a mean follow-up of 7.2 years. Most studies reported only primary revisions and focused on the stem component. Intraoperative complications such as femoral or acetabular fractures (5.3%) were low and easily manageable with no relevant sequelae, as were dislocation rates (2.8% of uncomplicated events and 1.6% of cases requiring re-revision). Failure (considered if there was aseptic loosening of the cement-in-cement revised component, 2%), re-revision (9.3%), implant survival and late complication rates were favourable. Functional patient-reported outcomes showed an overall improvement above the minimal clinically important difference at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The cement-in-cement technique is a viable option for hip arthroplasty revision surgery with low intraoperative and late complication rates, dislocations and immediate post-operative morbidity, resulting in good functional patient-reported outcomes and favourable medium-term implant survival.

[Periprosthetic fractures: basics, classification and treatment principles]

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) are becoming an increasingly important topic in orthopedics and trauma surgery due to the rising number of endoprosthetic joint replacements. The recently published unified classification system (UCS) has replaced numerous historical classification systems and can be applied to all PPFx regardless of the bone or joint involved. The treatment of PPFx requires individual therapeutic concepts taking patient-dependent and patient-independent factors into consideration. The conservative treatment of PPFx is only justified in exceptional situations. In contrast, the choice between operative treatment and deciding between osteosynthesis or revision arthroplasty is particularly based on the assessment of the implant stability. In order to achieve fracture consolidation and also a good functional outcome, knowledge of the basic biomechanical principles of operative (osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis) treatment of periprosthetic fractures is necessary.