Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults: reexamined as evidence-based and outcomes medicine

[Concomitant injuries of the wrist, distal ulna and distal radioulnar joint in distal radius fractures : Primary operative cotreatment vs. healing with no additional treatment]

Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures in adults and account for one quarter of all fractures, with increasing incidence. The number of patients and the requirement of an exact treatment are high. Continuous developments in diagnostic and operative possibilities enable in many cases a high-quality treatment with good clinical outcome; however, radius fractures rarely occur alone but in combination with additional fractures or ligamentous injuries. The frequency and extent of these injuries are not linked to the complexity of the primary injury. The aim is to recognize and correctly diagnose potential concomitant injuries. Many injuries do not need immediate treatment but heal without additional treatment after the radius has been treated. It is important to recognize those injuries which can cause severe complications if untreated; however, exactly this is often difficult. In many cases there is still no consensus if and how concomitant injuries should be treated. This article highlights the most frequent concomitant injuries in distal radius fractures with the possible advantages and disadvantages of cotreatment in order to facilitate decision making.

Microwave-assisted intralesional curettage combined with other adjuvant methods for treatment of Campanacci III giant cell tumor of bone in distal radius: a multicenter clinical study

Objective

To compare the clinical outcomes of microwave-assisted intralesional curettage(MAIC) with those of en bloc resection and autogenous fibular reconstruction (EBR-AFR) for treating grade III giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) of the distal radius and to elucidate the indications for wrist preservation surgery.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, 19 patients with grade III GCTB of the distal radius who underwent surgery at three medical institutions were included and categorized based on their surgical pattern. Seven patients underwent MAIC and internal fixation with bone cement (MAIC group) and 12 underwent EBR-AFR (EBR-AFR group). To evaluate the function of the affected limb postoperatively, wrist range of motion, grip strength, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores were recorded.

Results

The follow-up time of the MAIC group was 73.57 ± 28.61 (36-116) months, with no recurrence or lung metastasis. In contrast, the follow-up time of the EBR-AFR group was 55.67 ± 28.74 (36-132) months, with 1 case of local recurrence (8.3%, 1/12) and 1 case of lung metastasis (8.3%, 1/12). The wrist flexion, extension, supination, pronation, grip strength were better in the MAIC group than in the EBR-AFR group. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the MSTS score between the two groups, it is noteworthy that the MAIC group exhibited significantly superior emotional acceptance and hand positioning compared to the EBR-AFR group(p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The functional outcomes of the MAIC group are better. The treatment strategy for grade III GCTB of the distal radius should be determined based on the specific preoperative imaging findings. Nevertheless, MAIC can be the preferred surgical approach for most patients with grade III GCTB of the distal radius, particularly for young patients.

Ligament-Sparing Volar Radiocarpal Arthrotomy During Distal Radius Fracture Repair: Anatomical Description and Quantification of Articular Surface Area Visualized in a Cadaveric Model

PURPOSE

Distal radius (DR) fracture repair using the volar locked plating technique typically involves indirect fracture reduction, assessed using fluoroscopy, without direct visualization of the articular surface. This method of fracture repair may be guided by the rationale that volar radiocarpal ligament disruption may cause radiocarpal instability, although direct articular visualization may facilitate improved fracture reduction. This study investigated anatomical feasibility and articular surface visualization using volar ligament-sparing radiocarpal arthrotomy pertinent to DR fracture repair.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens of the upper extremity underwent volar arthrotomy via the standard flexor carpi radialis approach with partial longitudinal sectioning of the long radiolunate and partial transverse sectioning of the short radiolunate ligaments to visualize the articular surface of the DR. Following arthrotomy, the visible surface of the DR was analyzed using digital photography. The wrist was disarticulated, and the fully exposed articular surface was photographed. The visible area of the articular surface was quantified using digital imaging software by calculating the ratio of the surface area visualized using the arthrotomy to the total articular surface area.

RESULTS

The percentage of the articular surface area of the DR visualized using the volar arthrotomy was 76% ± 7.6% (range, 69%-90%), including both the scaphoid facet, lunate facet, and scapholunate ridge.

CONCLUSIONS

Volar radiocarpal arthrotomy allows clinically relevant visualization of the articular surface of the DR, including the scaphoid and lunate facets.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Radiocarpal arthrotomy may facilitate improved articular reduction during DR fracture repair via the volar approach.

Accuracy of radiographic measurements of fracture-induced deformity in the distal radius

Background

Management of the distal radius fracture (DRF) is to some extent based on radiographic characterization of fracture displacement. It remains unclear, however, if the measurements used to quantify displacement are accurate.

Purpose

To quantify accuracy of two radiographic measurements: dorsal/volar tilt and fracture compression, measured indirectly as ulnar variance (UV), using radiostereometric analyses (RSA) as reference standard.

Material and Methods

Twenty-one fresh frozen non-fractured human cadaveric forearms (right = 11, left = 10) were thawed and eligible for inclusion. The forearms were mounted on a custom made platform that allowed for controlled forearm rotation, and they underwent two rounds of imaging (both rounds consisted of RSA and radiographs). In round one, the non-fractured forearms were radiographed. In round two, artificial DRF´s with compression and dorsal angulation were created and imaging procedures repeated. Change in tilt and UV between the non-fractured and later fractured forearms was defined as fracture-induced deformity. Deformity was measured radiographically and additionally calculated using RSA. Bland Altman analyses were used to estimate agreement between radiographically measured, and RSA calculated, fracture-induced deformity.

Results

Our results indicated that radiographs underestimate the amount of fracture-induced deformity. Mean measured differences (bias) in dorsal tilt deformity between radiographs and RSA were -2.5° for both observers. The corresponding values for UV were -1.4 mm and -1.5 mm.

Conclusion

Quantifying fracture-induced deformity on radiographs underestimated the actual deformity when compared to RSA calculated deformity. These findings suggest that clinicians, at least in part, base fracture management and potentially corrective surgery on inaccurate measurements.

Elderly unstable distal radius fractures a prospective cohort study of bone substitutes-augmented percutaneous pinning

Background

Based on debatable recommendations of using bone substitutes for filling of metaphyseal void in elderly unstable distal radius fractures; this study investigated the following question “Do bone substitutes effectively contribute to postoperative stability of k-wire fixation construct and accelerate healing in elderly unstable distal radius fractures?”.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted from October 2014 to April 2021. According to use of bone substitutes, 40 patients of elderly unstable distal radius fractures were alternately allocated into; group-(A) of bone substitutes-augmented percutaneous pinning (19 patients); and group-(B) of non-augmented percutaneous pinning (21 patients). Groups were compared for preoperative patients’ demographics and postoperative ROM, Quick-DASH and Mayo Wrist scores, radiographic parameters (palmar tilt, radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and intra-articular step-off) and duration until radiographic fracture healing.

Results

Statistically, augmented and non-augmented groups were matched in terms of patients’ demographics (mean age; 58.7 vs. 62.0 years respectively, P-value = 0.25). All included fractures have healed with insignificantly longer duration in augmented group (7.1 vs. 6.8 weeks, P-value = 0.26). At 12-week postoperative evaluation, radiographic parameters of both groups were comparably well-maintained except for intra-articular step-off which showed significantly less secondary displacement in augmented group (0.1 vs. 0.4 mm, P-value = 0.01). There were insignificant differences in 6-month postoperative ROM, and Quick-DASH and Mayo Wrist scores.

Conclusion

Compared to its bone substitutes-augmented counterpart; non-augmented percutaneous pinning of elderly unstable distal radius fractures can offer advantages of comparable healing rates and functional and radiographic outcomes, less-invasive approach, shorter operative time and lower cost.

Level of evidence

III

When used to augment percutaneous pinning of elderly unstable distal radius fractures, bone substitutes did not significantly offer additional postoperative mechanical stability of fixation construct.

When used to augment percutaneous pinning of elderly unstable distal radius fractures, bone substitutes did not significantly accelerate fracture healing.

Compared to bone substitutes-augmented pinning; stand-alone percutaneous pinning of elderly unstable distal radius fractures can achieve comparable healing rates and satisfactory functional and radiographic outcomes; and in addition, less-invasive approach, shorter operative time and lower cost.

Effect of the Articular Surface Incongruency on Surgical Outcome of the Distal Radius Fracture

Purpose

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the joint fragment that mostly affects the outcome of the distal radius fracture surgically treated with a volar locking plate (VLP).

Methods

The outcomes of 69 patients with the distal radius fractures were evaluated at their final follow-up. The articular surface was divided into six specific fragments, and computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate the degree of mismatch of each fragments. A plain radiograph was also obtained for evaluation of the distal radius alignment. Clinical outcomes were measured by using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS). Univariate analyses were performed, with subsequent multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 14.8 (range, 12 to 52) months. The group with a worse DASH score showed significantly greater mismatch in the volar and dorsal lunate facets, as well as the central depression of the distal radius (p = 0.042, 0.031, and 0.023, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between the DASH score and degree of mismatch of the dorsal lunate facet and central depression of the distal radius (p = 0.040 and 0.011, respectively). Groups with worse MMWS showed significantly greater mismatch in the dorsal lunate facet (p = 0.025). There was a significant negative correlation between MMWS and abnormal ulnar variance and mismatch of the dorsal lunate facet and central depression of the distal radius (p = 0.041, 0.004, and 0.018, respectively). The result of multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a mismatch of the dorsal lunate facet is a significant predictor for a worse MMWS (odds ratio = 3.072, p = 0.043).

Conclusions

Articular surface mismatch of the dorsal lunate facet appears to mostly affect the surgical outcomes of the distal radius fractures using VLP. In cases where the dorsal lunate facet is heavily involved, surgeons should be cautious about its reduction and fixation.

Origins of the threshold for surgical intervention in intra-articular distal radius fractures

AIMS

The aim of this study was to identify the origin and development of the threshold for surgical intervention, highlight the consequences of residual displacement, and justify the importance of accurate measurement.

METHODS

A systematic review of three databases was performed to establish the origin and adaptations of the threshold, with papers screened and relevant citations reviewed. This search identified papers investigating functional outcome, including presence of arthritis, following injury. Orthopaedic textbooks were reviewed to ensure no earlier mention of the threshold was present.

RESULTS

Knirk and Jupiter (1986) were the first to quantify a threshold, with all their patients developing arthritis with > 2 mm displacement. Some papers have discussed using 1 mm, although 2 mm is most widely reported. Current guidance from the British Society for Surgery of the Hand and a Delphi panel support 2 mm as an appropriate value. Although this paper is still widely cited, the authors published a re-examination of the data showing methodological flaws which is not as widely reported. They claim their conclusions are still relevant today; however, radiological arthritis does not correlate with the clinical presentation. Function following injury has been shown to be equivalent to an uninjured population, with arthritis progressing slowly or not at all. Joint space narrowing has also been shown to often be benign.

CONCLUSION

Knirk and Jupiter originated the threshold value of 2 mm. The lack of correlation between the radiological and clinical presentations warrants further modern investigation. Measurement often varies between observers, calling a threshold concept into question and showing the need for further development in this area. The principle of treatment remains restoration of normal anatomical position. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1457-1461.

Incidence and missed diagnosis risk of occult posterior malleolar fractures associated with the tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review

Background

Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) combined with occult posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs) are becoming widely recognized in the field of orthopedics. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical incidence, missed diagnosis rate, and treatment strategies of this combined injury.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE Ovid databases were searched for articles of English language from 1988 to 2020, identifying 1549 papers.

Results

Twenty-one of the 1278 identified studies were eligible for inclusion. Each study reported on the incidence of this combined injury, and 12 studies documented the missed diagnosis rate. Seventeen studies reported surgical intervention strategies for PMFs. In the present review, PMFs frequently occurred in spiral TSFs (70%), especially distal third spiral TSFs (70.4%), based on CT scans or additional MRI. Based on the original X-ray detection, approximately 50% of PMFs were missed in patients with a combined injury. In addition, the treatment strategies for PMFs were inconsistent. Most studies (11/17) believe that specific surgical management needs to be developed based on the fragment size, displacement, and stability of the PMF.

Conclusions

For patients with TSFs, spiral TSFs, especially distal third spiral TSFs, are closely related to PMFs and are often not sufficiently diagnosed by X-ray alone. Advanced CT and MRI examinations can significantly reduce the missed diagnosis rate of occult PMFs. According to available literature, the treatment strategy for PMFs associated with TSFs is questionable without convincing evidence of benefit.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02502-6.

A Critical Assessment of the Most Cited Papers on Distal Radius Fractures

This article reviews the impact of the most cited works on distal radius fractures. Judged by the most cited works in this field, distal radius fracture research has followed other paradigm shifts in the history of science. Landmark papers showed that restoring premorbid anatomy led to better outcomes, and a plurality of fixation strategies emerged. A breakthrough in technology came with volar plating, and the new paradigm emerged: precise anatomic reduction is achieved typically with volar plates, unless fragment-specific approaches are needed. This paradigm is being challenged as the association among malunion, arthritis, and function continues to be understood. The best treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly has also evolved through time.

Nuances of Radiographic Assessment of Distal Radius Fractures to Avoid Missed Fragments

Distal radius fractures, like many articular and periarticular fractures, can make it difficult to determine the true number, location, and orientation of fracture fragments. This article should help the reader work through imaging interpretation starting from the initial, often displaced radiographs to postreduction imaging and determination if further 3-dimensional imaging is necessary.

Accuracy and Early Clinical Outcome After 3-Dimensional Correction of Distal Radius Intra-Articular Malunions Using Patient-Specific Instruments

PURPOSE

To investigate the residual articular incongruity on computed tomography image data and the early clinical outcome of 3-dimensional planned and navigated intra-articular osteotomies of the distal radius.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of intra-articular osteotomies executed between 2008 and 2016. We identified 37 patients (aged 26-73 years) and performed a combined intra-articular and extra-articular osteotomy on 20 patients. A preoperative 3-dimensional plan with the superimposed bone of the contralateral healthy side was performed in each case to analyze and execute the osteotomy by intraoperative navigation. The residual articular incongruity was assessed by quantification of the maximal stepoff in the coronal or sagittal computed tomography scans. Clinical outcome, including range of motion, grip strength, and return to work, was assessed after a minimum follow-up of 12 months and compared with preoperative measurements.

RESULTS

On average, the preoperative intra-articular stepoff was 2.5 mm (±0.6 mm; range, 1.4-4.2 mm) and was significantly reduced to 0.8 mm (±0.2 mm) after surgery. After surgery, 30 patients had a stepoff less than 1 mm; in 7, a stepoff of 1.1 to 1.4 mm was measured. After 1 year, 22 had no pain, 9 had slight pain during heavy work, and 5 had moderate pain with no improvement compared with their preoperative status, although wrist strength and range of motion improved in all 37 patients. One patient underwent a secondary radioscapholunate arthrodeses owing to persistent pain despite a congruent joint with a small residual intra-articular stepoff (0.6 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular osteotomies of the distal radius treated by 3-dimensional preoperative planning and patient-specific guides are an accurate technique to reduce articular incongruity to an average stepoff of 0.8 mm (range, 0.3-1.4 mm). The early clinical outcomes demonstrated overall reduction in pain and improvement of range of motion and grip strength in 36 of 37 patients.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Assisted Reduction and Volar Plating through Preservation of Pronator Quadratus for Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fracture

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes following an arthroscopic-assisted reduction and volar plating (AR-VP) surgery through pronator quadratus (PQ) preservation for treating intra-articular distal radius fractures (IA-DRFs) and to assess prognostic factors that affect functional outcomes. Methods: Between March 2014 and February 2017, 54 patients who had intra-articular DRF and underwent AR-VP through the PQ preservation technique and completed 1-year follow-up were enrolled. Patients were divided into the satisfactory group (excellent and good results) and an unsatisfactory group (fair and poor results) based on the modified Mayo Wrist Scoring System (MMWS) scored at 1-year follow-up to determinate prognostic factors that affected clinical outcomes. Patients' demographics, clinical outcome measures (VAS, DASH, PRWE, etc.), and pre-and post-operative radiographic parameters were analyzed. Results: The outcomes according to MMWS were 10 excellent, 22 good, 14 fair, and 8 poor. A univariate analysis showed a significant difference between the groups (p < .05) for all radiographic parameters, sex, and the presence of an intra-articular comminution. In the multivariate analysis, female gender, presence of an intra-articular comminution, and difference of palmar articular tilt compared to uninjured wrist (> 20.1°) at trauma were considered as significant poor prognostic factors of functional outcome. Conclusions: AR-VP surgery through PQ preservation for intra-articular DRFs has reliable clinical and radiological outcomes. However, female gender, presence of an intra-articular comminution, and difference of palmar articular tilt compared to the uninjured wrist (> 20.1°) at initial injury were considered poor prognostic factors for AR-VP through PQ preservation for intra-articular DRF.

Recent advances in the surgical treatment of malunions in hand and forearm using three-dimensional planning and patient-specific instruments

Malunions of the forearm and hand cause significant disability. Moreover, intraarticular deformities may contribute to early onset osteoarthritis. Such conditions require precise surgical correction in order to improve functional outcomes and prevent early or late complications. The purpose of this study was to describe the technical advantages of accurate anatomical reconstruction using 3D guided osteotomies and patient specific instruments (PSI) in multiple joints of the hand and forearm. Acquisition of three-dimensional (3D) datasets and surgical implementation of PSI was performed in a series of patients between December 2014 and July 2017. Patients had intra- or extra-articular malunions of the forearm, radiocarpal joint, trapeziometacarpal joint, or proximal interphalangeal joint. A previously described 3D surface model that incorporates CT data was used for segmentation (Mimics®, Materialise™, Belgium). For all the cases, CT scans of both forearms were acquired to use the contralateral uninjured side as the anatomic reconstruction template. Computer-assisted assessment of the deformity, the preoperative plan, and the design of PSI are described. Outcomes were determined by evaluating step-off correction, fusion, changes in range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Six patients were included in the study; all achieved fusion. Improved clinical outcomes including pain reduction, better ROM and grip strength were obtained. Complete correction of intraarticular step-off was achieved in all cases with intraarticular malunions. 3D guided osteotomies are an established surgical treatment option for malunions of the hand and forearm. 3D analysis is a helpful diagnostic tool that provides detailed information about the underlying deformity. PSI can be developed and used for surgical correction with maximal accuracy for both intraarticular step-off and angular deformity.

Functional Outcomes of Tillaux and Triplane Fractures with 2 to 5 Millimeters of Intra-Articular Gap

BACKGROUND

The treatment of transitional ankle fractures (Tillaux and triplane) is often dictated by the amount of displacement at the articular surface. Although >2 mm is a common indication for operative management, this practice has not been strongly supported by either the pediatric or adult literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether operative treatment of transitional fractures with 2 to 5 mm of intra-articular gap leads to superior functional outcomes compared with cast management.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients treated for distal tibial fractures at a single institution between 2009 and 2017 was conducted. Computed tomographic images obtained after closed reduction were reviewed to identify patients with 2 to 5 mm of displacement (either gap or step-off) at the articular surface of the tibial plafond. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo system. Only patients with functional outcome data (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM]) at a minimum of 2 years after treatment were included. Two multivariable linear regression models were developed using backward stepwise regression with either the FAAM Sports score or the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Sports score as the dependent variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (34 with triplane fractures and 23 with Tillaux fractures) with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 2.0 to 9.2 years) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four patients were treated operatively, and 23 patients were treated with closed reduction and cast application. Nonoperative treatment, greater intra-articular gap, and presence of a grade-III complication were associated with worse functional outcomes in both multivariable regression models. A gap after closed reduction remained a negative predictor of functional outcome even in patients who were treated operatively. Patients who were treated nonoperatively and had ≤2.5 mm of gap had a significantly higher mean SANE Sports score at 90% than those patients with >2.5 mm of gap at 75% (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In Tillaux and triplane fractures with 2 to 5 mm of gap at the tibial plafond, a greater gap after closed reduction, nonoperative treatment, and complications were negative predictors of functional outcome at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Surgical management likely conveys the greatest functional benefit when the intra-articular gap exceeds 2.5 mm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

International Survey: Factors Associated With Operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures and Implications for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' Appropriate Use Criteria

OBJECTIVES

Through an international survey, we assessed whether deciding to operatively treat an intra-articular distal radius fracture (DRF) is guided by identifiable patient and surgeon factors. In addition, we compared surgeons' treatment decisions with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) treatment recommendations.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey asked 224 surgeons to operatively or nonoperatively treat 28 hypothetical patients with radiographs of an intra-articular DRF. We randomized patient age (50/70 years), gender, mechanism of injury, activity level, and OTA/AO fracture type. We classified 6 fractures as "nonclinically significant displacement" and 22 as "potentially clinically significant displacement." Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Statistical significance was P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Patient factors independently associated with surgery included younger age (OR 6.7, P = 0.003), clinically significant fracture displacement (type B: OR 122, CI, 20-739, P < 0.001; type C: OR 59, CI, 12-300, P < 0.001), normal activity level (OR 5.0, P < 0.001), and high-energy mechanisms (OR 1.3, P = 0.002). Surgeon factors associated with recommending surgery included practicing outside the United States (Europe: OR 2.6, P < 0.001; "other": OR 4.8, P < 0.001). Hand surgeons most often selected surgery, as compared to orthopaedic trauma surgeons (OR 2.3, P = 0.001) and "other orthopaedists" (OR 2.2, P = 0.022). Thirty-seven percent of treatment decisions for patients with normal activity levels were rated by AUC recommendations as "rarely appropriate," which included 91% disagreement for 70-year-olds with nonclinically significant displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons use patient age and fracture displacement to make treatment recommendations for intra-articular DRF. We recommend that the AUC be updated to include these clinical factors as essential components in its algorithm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dorsal Lunate Facet Fracture Reduction Using a Bone Reduction Forceps

Background  The dorsal lunate facet fragment represents part of a complex articular injury of the distal radius and is challenging to reduce through a standard volar approach. We propose reduction through a standard volar approach and intraoperative dorsal lunate facet reduction using a bone forceps. To evaluate the postoperative reduction, we used computed tomography (CT) scan. Methods  We retrospectively included 60 patients with a median follow-up of 44 weeks. Fracture reduction was evaluated using pre- and direct postoperative CT scans of the wrist, measuring the articular gap and step of the sigmoid notch. The range of motion was evaluated clinically by the treating physician. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements and to compare wrist range of motion. Results  When comparing the injured with the uninjured wrist, there was a significant difference in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination. In 87% of the patients, there was complete radiographic reduction of the fracture. Conclusion  This study shows that dorsal ulnar lunate facet fracture fragments in distal radius fractures can be reduced through a standard volar approach with the help of an intraoperative bone reduction forceps. Using wrist CT, we showed that 87% of the patients with a dorsal ulnar lunate facet fragment had a postoperative articular step or gap of <1 mm. Level of Evidence : This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

Volar Locking Plates Versus Augmented External Fixation of Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: Functional Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the functional outcomes following fixation with a volar locking plate (VLP) with those outcomes after augmented external fixation (EF) of displaced, intra-articular distal radial fractures in patients 18 to 70 years of age.

METHODS

Following inclusion, randomization, and surgery, clinical examination and outcome assessments were conducted at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. The primary outcome was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and secondary outcomes included wrist range of motion, grip strength, and pain assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Over a span of 3 years, 166 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 55.0 years (standard deviation [SD] = 11.5 years), with the ages distributed evenly in each treatment group by block randomization (84 patients in the VLP group and 82 in the EF group). The patients in the VLP group had a significantly better mean QuickDASH score, range of motion, and grip strength at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. There were no significant differences between the groups at 2 years. On the basis of the minimal clinically important difference, the difference in the QuickDASH score was clinically relevant only at 6 weeks and arguably at 3 months (9.2 and 8.5 points, respectively). Therefore, the statistically significant improvement in the functional outcome of VLP compared with that of EF cannot be safely said to have clinical relevance beyond 12 weeks. The overall complication rate was comparable between the 2 groups. The rate of follow-up at 2 years was 97.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

VLP fixation resulted in faster recovery of function compared with EF, but no functional advantage was demonstrated at 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Distal Radius Fractures: AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria Versus Actual Management at a Level I Trauma Center

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine whether the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for distal radius fractures correlates with actual treatment by orthopedic hand surgeons at a level I trauma center.

METHODS

ICD-9 codes were used to retrospectively identify patients who presented with wrist fractures over 1 year. Patients with isolated distal radius fractures were evaluated using the AAOS AUC application for distal radius fractures. Actual treatment was then compared with treatment recommended by the AUC.

RESULTS

Of the 112 patients, 64 (57%) received treatment that matched the AAOS AUC recommendation as an "appropriate treatment." Actual management matched the AUC recommendation 100%, 7%, and 50% of the time, for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type A, B, and C fractures, respectively. Surgery was performed for type A, B, and C fractures 30%, 7%, and 50% of the time, respectively. For type B fractures, only the 2 cases that were managed operatively were in agreement with the AUC. For type C fractures, increased patient age (57 years and older) was significantly associated with nonoperative treatment decisions. Surgeon decisions for nonoperative treatment were in agreement with the AUC recommendations 40% of the time, whereas surgeon decisions for surgery matched the AUC recommendations 97% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

We found low agreement between actual treatment decisions and the AUC-recommended "appropriate" treatments, especially for the type B and C fractures that were managed nonoperatively. The AUC favors surgery for all intra-articular fractures, while we emphasized age and fracture displacement in our decision-making process.

Clinical and Radiographic Results of Reconstruction with Fibular Autograft for Distal Radius Giant Cell Tumor

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the result of en bloc resection and reconstruction of the distal radius with a non-vascularized fibular autograft for giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2015, 12 eligible patients (seven males, five females, mean age 31.3 years) with grade III GCT of the distal radius were treated by en bloc resection and reconstruction with non-vascularized proximal fibular autografts in four Chinese institutions (members of Giant Cell Tumor Team of China). The patients had a clinical and radiographic review every 6 months for the first 2 years then annually thereafter. The functional, oncologic and radiological outcomes of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 39.6 months. Bony union was achieved in all cases. None of the patients were dissatisfied with the shape and appearance of the wrist. The mean MSTS score was 25.23 ± 2.38 (range, 22-29). The mean DASH score was 13.0 (range, 6.7-33.3). The average range of motion of the wrist was: 35.8° ± 14.5° of extension, 14.0° ± 8.4° of flexion, 15.5° ± 6.7° of radial deviation, 19.4° ± 10.1° of ulnar deviation, 57.2° ±18.9° of pronation and 44.0° ± 24.8° of supination. The average percentage of grip strength was 55.2% ± 29.0% compared with that of the contralateral side. One localized soft tissue recurrence occurred; it was successfully managed by excision. Lung metastases developed postoperatively in one case and were treated by gamma knife radiotherapy. There was radiographic evidence of radiocarpal arthritis in eleven patients, bone resorption in ten, distal radioulnar joint diastasis in six, ulnar deviation of the wrist in seven, subluxation of the carpal bone in three and dislocation of the carpal bone in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction with a non-vascularized proximal fibular autograft is a reasonable option after en bloc resection of the distal radius for giant cell tumor of bone.

Citation analysis of the 100 most common articles regarding distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

Bibliometric studies are increasingly being utilized as a tool for gauging the impact of different literature within a given field. The purpose of this study was to identify the most cited articles related to the management of distal radius fractures to better understand how the evidence of this topic has been shaped and changed over time.

METHODS

We utilized the ISI web of science database to conduct a search for the term "distal radius fracture" under the "orthopaedics" research area heading, and sorted the results by number of times cited. The 100 most cited articles published in orthopedic journals were then analyzed for number of citations, source journal, year of publication, number of authors, study type, level of evidence, and clinical outcomes utilized.

RESULTS

The 100 most cited articles identified were published between 1951 and 2009. Total number of citations ranged between 525 and 67, and came from ten different orthopedic journals. The largest number of articles came from J Hand Surg Am and J Bone Joint Surg Am, each with 32. Consistent with previous analyses of orthopedic literature, the articles were primarily clinical, and of these, 53/76 were case series. The vast majority were evidence level IV. Only a small percentage of articles utilized patient reported outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that despite distal radius fractures being a common fracture encountered by physicians, very few of the articles were high quality studies, and only a low proportion of the studies include patient reported outcome measures. Surgeons should take this lack of high-level evidence into consideration when referencing classic papers in this field.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Analysis of the 100 most cited distal radius fracture articles allows for delineation of which articles are most common in the field and if a higher level of evidence correlates positively with citation quantity.

Articular Gap and Step-off Revisited: 3D Quantification of Operative Reduction for Posterior Malleolar Fragments

OBJECTIVES

Despite advanced imaging techniques, classic measurements of fracture reduction have not been revisited to date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of innovative measurement techniques to quantify operative fragment reduction of posterior malleolar fractures by quantification of three-dimensional computed tomography (Q3DCT).

METHODS

Twenty-eight ankle fractures including a posterior malleolar fragment (AO/OTA type 44) were evaluated using 2DCT and Q3DCT to postoperatively quantify fragment reduction. "Classic" maximum gap and step-off of the posterior fragment were measured on 2DCT and Q3DCT. In addition, 2 innovative Q3DCT parameters were introduced and their reliability was tested using intraclass correlations (ICCs): gap surface (mm) and multidirectional 3D-displacement (mm).

RESULTS

"Classic" measurements showed a median maximum step-off of 1.1 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 0.0-1.8 mm] on 2DCT versus a median step-off of 0.6 mm (IQR 0.0-1.1) on Q3DCT. Median maximum gap was 1.2 mm (IQR 0.0-3.8) on 2DCT, and its equivalent on Q3DCT showed no median displacement. Q3DCT measurements revealed a median gap surface of 14.5 mm (IQR 4.7-30.0) and a median multidirectional 3D-displacement of 0.7 mm (IQR 0.0-1.1). Interrater reliability of these new Q3DCT parameters of displacement was excellent (ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-0.98) for gap surface and good (ICC 0.64, 95% CI 0.28-0.88) for 3D-displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Q3DCT is a reliable and promising technique for postoperative evaluation of fracture fragment reduction. In addition to "classic" gap and step-off measurements, we propose to explore total gap surface and 3D-displacement as innovative radiographic measurements in future clinical studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Wrist function in malunion: Is the distal radius designed to retain function in the face of fracture?

Introduction Fractures of the distal radius are the most common fracture in humans and are the sempiternal hazard of 3.5 million years of bipedalism. Despite the antiquity of the injury, one of the most controversial topics in current orthopaedics is the management of distal radius fractures. It has been suggested that radiographic appearances rarely correlate with functional outcomes. As the success of the human species is predicated almost exclusively on its dexterity and intelligence, it is conceivable that the distal radius has evolved to preserve function even in the face of injury. We therefore hypothesise that the distal radius is designed to accommodate the possibility of fracture. Methods We conducted a review of studies comparing fracture pattern and form with function. We also explore the paleoanthropological evidence and comparative studies with other primates. Findings The evidence points to the human distal radius being highly tolerant of post-fracture deformity in terms of preservation of function. In addition, the distal radius appears to have apparently anatomically 'redundant' features that confer this capability. We believe these phenomena to be an evolved trait that developed with bipedalism, increasing the chances of survival for a species whose success depends upon its dexterity.

Recovery of Wrist Function after Volar Locking Plate Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our present study was to examine the recovery of the postoperative wrist function, and to compare the range of motion among each direction ofthe wrist joint during the same time periods after surgery for distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Twenty patients treated with a volar locking plate were evaluated. The active range of motion and grip strength were assessed at four weeks, six weeks, three months, six months and one year after surgery.

RESULTS

The ratio of the range of motion in pronation and supination recovered significantly earlier than for any other directions within six months after surgery (p = 0.0205), however, the ratio of the range of motion among the six directions was not significantly different at one year after surgery (p = 0.0823). The recovery of the range of motion in flexion was 96.8% compared with the contralateral wrist at one year after surgery, and it was not significantly lower than that in extension, radial deviation or ulnar deviation (97.8%, 93.5%, 94.4%, respectively). The grip strength of dominant hand recovered from 50% after four weeks to 66% after six weeks, 83% after three months, 91% after six months and 106% at the examination performed after one year compared with the uninjured non-dominant hand. The grip strength of non-dominant hand recovered from 52% after four weeks to 59% after six weeks, 79% after three months, 84% after six months and 94% at the examination performed after one year compared with the uninjured dominant hand. The mean DASH score was 5.3.

CONCLUSIONS

The range of motion in flexion can achieve similar improvement to that in the other directions by obtaining the appropriate postoperative parameters. The optimal postoperative radiographic parameters were thus identified to be essential for successfully obtaining a recovery of the wrist function for unstable distal radius fractures.

The Effect of Displaced Dorsal Rim Fragment in a Distal Radius Fracture

Background In intra-articular fracture of distal radius, the intra-articular fragments can be divided into some specific fragments. In particular, the poor outcomes have been well documented for reduction loss of the volar lunate facet, but the effect of a displaced dorsal rim fracture has rarely been addressed. Materials and Methods The records of 26 patients with dorsal rim fragment displaced by more than 2 mm after volar locking plate (VLP) fixation for a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture (DRF) treated from March 2006 to March 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical assessments including grip strengths, wrist range of motions, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were performed at 12 months postoperatively. Widths of the distal ends of dorsal rims were determined by preoperative computed tomography (CT). Dorsal rim fragment displacements were measured in immediate postoperative plain lateral radiographs. Radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance were measured on immediate postoperative wrist radiographs. Arthritic changes of radiocarpal joints were graded using radiographs obtained at 12 months postoperatively. Description of Technique DRFs were fixed using a VLP in the usual manner. Although DRF displacement was noticed after plate fixation, no further procedure was performed. The sizes of articular portions of dorsal rim fragments were measured arthroscopically in 5 of the 26 patients at the time of plate fixation. Results At 12 months postoperatively, mean grip strength, wrist flexion arc, and mean wrist extension arc were 86 ± 13, 87 ± 11, and 91 ± 10%, respectively, of contralateral sides. Mean forearm supination and pronation were 96 ± 8 and 99 ± 5%, respectively, of contralateral sides. Mean DASH score was 11 ± 10 points. Preoperatively, mean width of the distal end of dorsal rim fragments and mean displacements of dorsal rim fragments were 2.0 ± 0.6 and 3.0 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. Mean width of the articular portions of dorsal rim fragment by arthroscopic examination was 1.0 ± 0.4 mm. Mean radial inclination was 21 ± 4.8 degrees, mean volar angulation was 4.8 ± 3.9 degrees, and mean ulnar variance was 0.6 ± 1.8 mm at immediate postoperatively. Two patients showed grade I arthritic changes at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions The articular portions of dorsal rim fragments measured arthroscopically were smaller than determined by CT. Furthermore, the study shows that displaced dorsal rim fragments in dorsally displaced DRFs treated by VLP do not adversely affect wrist clinical outcomes.

Intra-articular Fractures of the Sigmoid Notch of the Distal Radius: Analysis of Progression to Distal Radial Ulnar Joint Arthritis and Impact on Upper Extremity Function in Surgically Treated Fractures

Background Studies have established an increased risk of radiocarpal joint posttraumatic arthritis in patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius, although this phenomenon has yet to be evaluated in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Purpose We hypothesized that patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the sigmoid notch would have a higher prevalence of DRUJ arthritis and greater upper extremity dysfunction after operative treatment of distal radius fractures compared with fractures without sigmoid notch involvement. We also hypothesized that the degree of sigmoid notch incongruity would be correlated with the grade of DRUJ arthritis and the severity of upper extremity dysfunction. Patients and Methods A retrospective review was conducted on surgically treated patients with distal radius fractures with pre- and/or postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients were divided into groups based on presence or absence of fracture extension into the sigmoid notch. Within the sigmoid notch group, postoperative CT scans were used to measure sigmoid notch fracture step-off and diastasis (mm), as well as volar or dorsal DRUJ subluxation (%). Patients were administered Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaires and radiographs were obtained to grade DRUJ arthritis using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) radiographic criteria. Results Thirty-three patients were included (19 with sigmoid notch involvement and 14 without) with an average radiographic follow-up of 6.3 years (range: 3.5-10.1 years). DASH scores were available for all patients, and radiographic follow-up was available in 24 patients (73%). A trend toward higher grade of DRUJ arthritis and poorer average DASH was found in those with sigmoid notch involvement, but was not statistically different. In the sigmoid notch group there were poorer DASH scores in patients with coronal step-off > 1.0-mm (p < 0.05). There were no significant correlations between sigmoid notch step-off, diastasis or DRUJ subluxation and either KL grade of arthritis or DASH scores. Conclusion Fractures involving the sigmoid notch did not appear to have a greater prevalence of DRUJ posttraumatic arthritis in operatively treated patients at greater than 6 years of follow-up. Postoperative sigmoid notch step-off, diastasis or DRUJ subluxation had a minimal effect on upper extremity function, but fractures with a coronal step-off of > 1.0-mm exhibited higher levels of upper extremity dysfunction. Level of Evidence Prognostic, Level III-Case control.

Classification and treatment of distal radius fractures: a survey among orthopaedic trauma surgeons and residents

Purpose

Classification, the definition of an acceptable reduction and indications for surgery in distal radius fracture management are still subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to characterise current distal radius fracture management in Europe.

Methods

During the European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ECTES) 2015 a 20-question multiple-choice survey was conducted among the attending surgeons and residents of the hand and wrist session. Consensus was defined as more than 50 % identical answers (moderate consensus 50–75 % and high consensus more than 75 %).

Results

A total of 46 surgeons and residents participated in the survey. High consensus was found among both surgeons and residents for defining the AO/OTA classification as the preferred classification system. For the definition of an acceptable reduction, a moderate to high consensus could be determined. Overall, high consensus was found for non-operative treatment instead of operative treatment in dislocated extra- and intra-articular distal radius fractures with an acceptable closed reduction, regardless of age. We found high (surgeons) and moderate (residents) consensus on the statement that an intra-articular gap or step-off ≥2 mm, in patients younger than 65 years, is an absolute indication for ORIF. The same applied for ORIF in dislocated fractures without an acceptable closed reduction in patients younger than 75 years of age.

Conclusion

Current distal radius fracture management in Europe is characterised by a moderate to high consensus on the majority of aspects of fracture management.

Radiographical measurements for distal intra-articular fractures of the radius using plain radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images

OBJECTIVE

Operative treatment of an intra-articular distal radius fracture is one of the most common procedures in orthopedic and hand surgery. The intra- and interobserver agreement of common radiographical measurements of these fractures using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and plain radiographs were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients undergoing open reduction and volar fixation for a distal radius fracture were studied. Two radiologists analyzed the preoperative radiographs and CBCT images. Agreement of the measurements was subjected to intra-class correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

Plain radiographs provided a slightly poorer level of agreement. For fracture diastasis, excellent intraobserver agreement was achieved for radiographs and good or excellent agreement for CBCT, compared to poor interobserver agreement (ICC 0.334) for radiographs and good interobserver agreement (ICC 0.621) for CBCT images. The Bland-Altman analyses indicated a small mean difference between the measurements but rather large variation using both imaging methods, especially in angular measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

For most of the measurements, radiographs do well, and may be used in clinical practice. Two different measurements by the same reader or by two different readers can lead to different decisions, and therefore a standardization of the measurements is imperative. More detailed analysis of articular surface needs cross-sectional imaging modalities.

The relationship between radiographic parameters and clinical outcome of distal radius fractures in elderly patients

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Treatment of distal radius fractures in elderly patients is controversial. This study explored the relationship between radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes of patients with distal radius fractures following conservative treatment. The study was done using radiographic measurements of distal radius fractures in elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-two active, healthy patients with conservatively managed distal radius fractures were included in the study. Functional and radiographic assessments were made 1 year after injury. Fifty patients who underwent corrective osteotomy comprised the control group. Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The correlation coefficients of the radiographic parameters were analysed using multiple regression.

RESULT

Radius height (RH), volar tilt (VT) and Mayo wrist and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores in the experimental group were significantly superior to those of the control group. There was no significant group difference in radial inclination. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the most important factor affecting functional outcome was RH, followed by VT.

DISCUSSION

RH and VT were significantly correlated with the clinical outcomes of conservative treatment of distal radius fractures. RH should be given foremost consideration in elderly patients. Preoperatively, surgeons should evaluate this parameter carefully and be prepared to treat injuries accordingly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV retrospective study.

Current concepts in the treatment of distal radial fractures

Distal radial fractures are among the most commonly encountered traumatic fractures of the upper extremity. Initial trauma mechanism, fracture pattern, associated injuries, and patient age influence treatment and outcome. Although stable fractures are commonly treated conservatively, the past decade has seen changes in surgical practice and techniques. Indications for surgery have been extended and refined based on new insight into the pathophysiology of the distal end of the forearm and technological advances in implant design. Despite the frequency of this fracture, only limited higher-level evidence exists to guide practitioners in decision making for this injury. This article highlights key concepts in the treatment of distal radial fractures and summarizes current evidence.

Clinical and biomechanical investigation of an increased articular cavity depth after distal radius fractures: effect on range of motion, osteoarthrosis and loading patterns

INTRODUCTION

After fracture, distal radius malunion with dissociation of the volar and dorsal ulnar fracture fragments can lead to an increased articular cavity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To investigate its clinical impact we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 81 patients and simulated this form of malunion in a biomechanical experiment with six cadaver specimens in a dynamic loading set-up.

RESULTS

In clinics, a higher arthritis stage was significantly correlated with an increased articular cavity depth and an increased anterioposterior distance. In cadaver specimens, a significantly decreased range of motion and significantly altered intraarticular contact characteristics were recognized for an increased cavity.

CONCLUSION

Alterations in contact biomechanics could be one reason for the higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis when a deeper central impaction of the distal radius is present. From a clinical and experimental point of view, restoration of the normal shape of the distal radius is considered to minimize the risk for posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis.

Correction of extra-articular distal radius malunions using an anatomic radial plate

Malunion is a debilitating complication of a distal radius fracture. The malunion often requires a corrective osteotomy to restore the stability and joint congruity about the distal radius, a procedure which offers tremendous benefits in terms of pain, strength, and functionality. Here we describe a unique technique to address the malunion of an extra-articular distal radius fracture using a radial anatomic plate. This is a simple and reproducible method of fixation involving straightforward anatomy, which does not require excessive radiography, and which represents an excellent choice of fixation in the distal radius malunion.

A comparison of the long-term outcome of partial articular (AO Type B) and complete articular (AO Type C) distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

A short-term comparison of AO type B (shearing) and type C (compression) articular fractures of the distal radius found no significant differences in functional outcome, but long-term studies would provide important information. We tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference in arm-specific disability between patients with type B and C fractures in long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We evaluated 46 patients (17 with type B fractures and 29 patients with 31 type C fractures of the distal radius) with a mean age of 39 years at the time of injury at a mean of 20 years after operative treatment. We used the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and 2 physician-based rating systems, the modified Mayo wrist score and the modified Gartland and Werley score. We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses to identify the factors that contributed most to the variation in these scores.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between patients with type B and C fractures on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, modified Mayo wrist, or Gartland and Werley scores, or with respect to range of motion, grip strength, and arthrosis. The only statistical difference was in volar tilt of the articular surface on lateral radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

On average, patients undergoing operative treatment of type B and type C articular fractures of the distal radius have similar impairment, symptoms, and disability in the long-term.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Common myths and evidence in the management of distal radius fractures

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fracture treated by physicians, but questions remain regarding optimal management. Fracture patterns, biomechanics, and treatment strategies have been debated for more than 200 years, and research shows many controversies regarding long-held beliefs. Although these common myths have been propagated and considered fact, they are not based on the best-available evidence. This article illustrates some of the major controversies regarding the management of DRFs. To provide optimal care in a world of evidence-based medicine, clinicians must shift their thinking and accept that some of the indoctrinated ideas may represent a flawed heuristic approach.

Management of distal radius fractures from the North American perspective

In North America, the rate of nonoperative management of displaced distal radius fractures has declined as the rate of internal fixation has increased. Volar locking plate fixation has increased in popularity despite a lack of supportive level 1 evidence. Issues of cost-effectiveness are relevant because there is no best-practice treatment at this stage. Clinicians should be aware of the goals of treatment and challenges, particularly in managing elderly patients with distal radius fractures. Large, randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses may provide answers about when operative intervention is favored over nonoperative management and which operative intervention provides the best outcomes.

The effects of a displaced dorsal rim fracture on outcomes after volar plate fixation of a distal radius fracture

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a displaced dorsal rim fracture has an adverse effect on wrist function after volar plate fixation of a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture (DRF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two matched cohorts of 23 matched patients, one with a displaced dorsal rim fracture >2mm (group 1), and the other without a dorsal rim fracture (group 2) were analysed in this study of volar locking plate fixation for dorsally unstable DRFs. The two cohorts were analysed for differences in wrist function and wrist pain, radiographic parameters and arthritic grades of radiocarpal joints. Displacement of dorsal rim fragments and diameters of the retained articular portions of dorsal rims in group 1 were measured.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the two groups in overall wrist function or wrist pain. Mean displacement of dorsal rims in group 1 was 3.0mm and the mean diameter of the retained articular portion of dorsal articular wall was 2.0mm. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of any radiographic parameters or the arthritic grading of radiocarpal joints.

CONCLUSION

A displaced dorsal rim fracture does not appear to affect outcomes adversely after volar locking plate fixation of dorsally displaced DRFs.