American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femur fracture

Submuscular nonlocking plates: an effective option for pediatric extra-articular proximal femur fractures

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of submuscular plating using nonlocking plates for extra-articular proximal femur fractures (EPFF) in children. From our hospital records, we retrieved data of 15 children treated with submuscular plating with nonlocking dynamic compression plates (DCP) for EPFF between January 2010 and September 2021. EPFF was defined as a proximal femur fracture within 10% of the femoral length below the lesser trochanter. Patients' demographics, as well as details of the duration of operation, type of DCP used, time to union, complications, and outcomes using Flynn criteria were noted. There were nine males and six females. Mean age of the patients was 10.8 ± 1.9 years (range 7-14 years). All the patients had fracture union and two patients had union with an angulation less than 10°. All fractures healed uneventfully with a mean time to union of 11.8 ± 1.2 weeks (range 10-15 weeks). No patient required surgery for complications or malunion. Using Flynn criteria, excellent outcomes were seen in 13 out of 15 patients. There were no poor outcomes. Our study shows that submuscular plating using nonlocking plates is an effective option for treating pediatric EPFF. Treatment of these tricky fractures with submuscular plating using nonlocking plates shows excellent outcomes with minimal complications.

Submuscular plating vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal femur fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of submuscular plating (SMP) vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in the treatment of pediatric femur shaft fracture.

Method

Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of SMP and ESIN in pediatric shaft fracture were retrieved from five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, OVID, and Web of Science) from inception to March 2023 using a systematic literature search strategy. A total of 13 outcome measures, such as perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results, were included in the meta-analysis.

Results

Eight eligible studies involving 491 patients were included in the narrative synthesis. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Meta-analysis showed reduced radiation time (RT), soft tissue irritation and angular deformation in the SMP group than in the ESIN group. However, the SMP group had greater estimated blood loss (EBL) than the ESIN group. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS), implant removal, complications requiring surgery, Flynn score, incidence of infection, fracture healing time, and limb length discrepancy (LLD) were similar between the two groups. Only one study reported higher incidences of fracture nonunion or delayed healing in the ESIN group.

Conclusion

SMP is an effective and safe intervention superior to ESIN in reducing soft tissue irritation, angular deformation and radiation time. Given the presence of potential bias and heterogeneity, surgeons should select the treatment that would provide the best outcomes for EBL, LOS, operation time, and bone nonunion or delayed healing based on their experience.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023404118, Identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021228512).

Do All Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures Need a Computed Tomography Scan of the Ipsilateral Femoral Neck? Calculating the Incidence of Concomitant Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

In adults, the incidence of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in the setting of femoral shaft fractures is reported to be as high as 9%; however, scant literature exists on the same clinical scenario in pediatric/adolescent populations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of ipsilateral femoral neck fracture in the setting of femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents treated in pediatric hospitals across the United States.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients aged 18 years or younger who were treated for a femoral neck, femoral shaft, and pertrochanteric femur fractures through an emergency department, inpatient, ambulatory surgery, or observation visit. Patients were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Data from 49 pediatric hospitals between the years 2002 and 2020 were included. Incidence was calculated as the number of cases including the event divided by the total number of cases.

RESULTS

A total of 90,146 records were identified from a cohort of 55,733,855 (0.16%). Distal femur fractures, pathologic fractures, and periprosthetic fractures were excluded, resulting in 65,651 unique cases. Of the 65,651 cases, 7104 (11%) were identified as isolated neck fractures. The combined incidence of femoral neck or pertrochanteric femur fractures in the setting of a femoral shaft fracture was 82.3 per 10,000 cases (0.82%). Only 283 cases of concomitant femoral neck and shaft fractures were found among 55,169 femoral shaft fractures (0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ipsilateral femoral neck or pertrochanteric femur fractures in the setting of a femoral shaft fracture is 82.3 per 10,000 patients (0.82%) based on data from Pediatric Health Information System-participating institutions. The incidence of femoral neck/pertrochanteric femur fractures and femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents is more than 10 times lower than reported for adults; therefore, the routine use of advanced diagnostic imaging in pediatric patients with femoral shaft fractures should be considered cautiously.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; cross-sectional analysis.

ESIN in femur fractures in children under 3: is it safe?

BACKGROUND

Pediatric femur fractures are a major trauma in children. Different treatment algorithms have been developed but indications for surgical treatment, especially in very young patients, are still controversial. Literature recommends surgical stabilization with elastic-stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) starting at the age of 3 and non-operative treatment in younger patients. This study sought to present the outcome of patients younger than 3 years of age treated with ESIN for femur fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were patients younger than 3 treated with ESIN in femur fractures. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, mechanism of injury, outcomes and complications were recorded using charts and X-rays. Primary outcome measures were time to mobility, fracture consolidation and surgical-related complications.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2020, 159 patients were treated with ESIN in femur fractures in our institution. A total of 30 patients met the criteria. The mean age was 2.1 ± 0.7 years (13 months-2.9 years). Most common mechanism was fall from standing height (60%). Other mechanisms were motor vehicle accidents as a pedestrian (10%) or as a passenger (10%) as well as direct blow trauma (20%). Femoral shaft fracture was the most common injury (80%). 5 subtrochanteric and one distal metaphyseal femur fractures were found. Mean length of stay was 2.0 ± 1.3 days. Radiographic controls were performed on day 1, 14 and 6 weeks after surgery if not otherwise specified or if complications occurred. 4.6 ± 1.2 (n 2-7) X-rays were performed on average after surgery. First radiographic consolidation signs were seen after 2.4 ± 0.6 weeks. Only one child showed surgical-related complication with a leg length discrepancy of 1 cm. In 10% of the patients, shortening after surgery of 1.7 ± 1.4 mm (0.3-3.1 mm) occurred. One child initially treated with traction therapy showed skin irritations and was operated with ESIN. No non-union or ESIN-related complications were found. Mean follow-up was 5.1 ± 4.4 months (4-24 months). First independent mobilization was seen at an average of 3.4 ± 1.1 weeks (2-6 weeks) after surgery. Implant removal was performed after 3.2 ± 1.3 months (2-8 months). No refracture after implant removal occurred.

CONCLUSION

Early results with ESIN show a reasonable and safe treatment option for femur fractures in toddlers and young children under the age of 3 with easy postoperative care, fast fracture union and early independent mobilization.

A systematic review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of fractures in children to develop the WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation

INTRODUCTION

Fractures have been identified as one of the 20 major health conditions for the World Health Organization's (WHO) Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation (PIR) - that includes also the needs of children and youth. The identification of existing interventions for rehabilitation and related evidence is a crucial step along the development of the PIR. The methods for the identification have been developed by WHO Rehabilitation Program and Cochrane Rehabilitation under the guidance of WHO's Guideline Review Committee Secretariat.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This paper is part of the "Best Evidence for Rehabilitation" (be4rehab) series, developed according to the methodology presented in the PIR introductory paper. It is a systematic review of the existing Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on fractures in pediatric population published between 2009 to 2019.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified seven relevant CPGs after title and abstract screening. According to inclusion/exclusion criteria and after checking for quality, publication time, multidisciplinarity and comprehensiveness, we have been able to include two CPGs: one addresses the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures and the other provides recommendations on the treatment of diaphyseal femur fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

The selected CPGs on the management of supracondylar humerus and diaphyseal femur fractures in pediatric population include few recommendations considered as interventions for rehabilitation, of low quality of evidence and weak strength. We found several gaps in specific rehabilitative topics. High quality studies are absolutely needed to upgrade the quality of available evidence to inform future development of guidelines.

Variability in the Follow-up Management of Pediatric Femoral Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Variability in follow-up has previously been identified in orthopaedic trauma. Variability in follow-up for pediatric femur fractures has not previously been documented. The aim of this study was to document the variability in clinical and radiographic follow-up for pediatric femur fractures based on the fixation method and the treating surgeon.

METHODS

This retrospective case series identified isolated femoral fractures in patients younger than 18 years, treated by eight surgeons at a single center from 2010 to 2015. The total number and frequency of clinical visits, radiographic visits and discrete radiograph views, demographic data, fracture classification, treatment method, and presence of complications were extracted. Variability in follow-up was assessed through descriptive statistics and linear and Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-four femoral fractures in 160 patients were included. Fractures were stratified by the treating surgeon. The mean length of follow-up ranged from 6.5 to 13.6 months. Complications increased follow-up time by mean 1.7 months (1.3 to 2.4). Patients who were treated with rigid locking nails were followed for the shortest amount of time, averaging 9.9 months, while traction followed by rigid locking nails averaged 24.4 (0.5 to 9.3) months of follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Variation in the length of follow-up was identified and was associated with the fixation method and the treating surgeon. Few patients were followed long enough to definitively identify complications and sequelae known to occur after femur fractures such as femoral overgrowth or growth arrest. The results of this study indicate a need for additional study and consensus on an appropriate follow-up for pediatric femur fractures.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus submuscular plating in pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures: a randomized controlled trial among children in South India

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the current preferred method for treating diaphyseal femur fractures in children. Introduction of the submuscular locked plate (SMP) fixation construct has opened the debate on treatment options for pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures in the older children and adolescents. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) protocol was designed to compare ESIN and SMP for diaphyseal femur fractures in children. An open-labelled RCT comparing SMP with ESIN was conducted from January 2013 to June 2016, for children aged 6-15 years with closed, acute femoral diaphyseal fractures. Randomization was done through computer-generated randomization sequence and opaque-sealed envelopes. Rate of adverse surgical events including unplanned re-operations was assessed as the primary outcome and secondary analysis was done for time to union, degree of malunion, limb length discrepancy, functional outcome at 2 years, surgical duration and blood loss, radiation exposure, hospital stay, cost incurred and secondary implant removal procedure. Forty children were randomized with allocation concealment. There were three adverse events in the SMP arm and five in the ESIN arm. Fifteen children with SMP underwent routine implant removal compared to only three children with ESIN (P < 0.001). Both ESIN and SMP are equally safe, viable and effective options for treating pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures. However, the additional cost of secondary surgery for implant removal in the SMP group proved to be a deterrent factor, which led to ESIN being the preferred option in our resource-limited setting.

Flexible Intramedullary Nail Versus Submuscular Locked Plate with the Cluster Technique in Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures Fixation

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study is the comparison between the flexible intramedullary nail and submuscular Locked Plate with the cluster technique in fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures at the age group between 6 and 12 years old with simple diaphyseal closed or Gustilo open grade I fractures.

METHODS

Fifty children aged 6-12 years with femoral fractures were enrolled in this study. The children were randomly assigned equally to the two groups for fractures fixation. The follow-up period was 1 year. A comparison of various parameters and outcomes between both groups was documented.

RESULTS

No significant differences were detected between both groups regarding the age, gender, affected side, mechanisms of fracture, or fracture classifications. The operative time and radiation time were longer in the plating group, while the amount of blood loss was lesser in the nail group. The patients treated with plating had better results concerning knee range of motion, weight-bearing, malalignment, and length discrepancy, with fewer complications and better functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The result of the present study supports the use of submuscular locked plate with cluster technique in the treatment of studied fractures over flexible IMN.

Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation

Background

External fixation is the primary treatment option in children for femoral shaft fractures, such as open femoral or multiple fractures. One complication is refracture, which is the biggest limitation of fixation devices. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with refracture after the removal of external fixation devices and decrease the frequency of refracture.

Materials and methods

Retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 165 patients treated at our hospital for fresh femoral shaft fractures with external fixation between May 2009 and February 2018 were included in this study. Patients with pathological fractures, fractures of the femoral neck, fractures that were fixed using plates or elastic stable intramedullary nailing, and old fractures, as well as those who underwent postoperative femoral surgery were excluded. Potential risk factors included: patient age, gender, and weight, fracture sides, open or closed fracture, fracture sites, reduction methods, operation time, perioperative bleeding, number and diameter of the screws, and immobilization time. These factors were identified by univariate and logistic regression analyses.

Results

Femoral shaft refracture developed in 24 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that refracture was not statistically significantly associated with any of the above factors, except AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF) classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio (L2, length of femur fixed by the two screws farthest from the fracture line; L3, the total length from the greater trochanter to the distal end of femur; P < 0.001 and P = 0.0141, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were also independent risk factors for femoral refracture.

Conclusions

Femoral shaft refracture is relatively common in children treated with external fixation. Because of the limited number of cases in this study, we cautiously concluded that the PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were independent risk factors for femoral shaft refracture in these patients.

Level of evidence

IV

Deciding without data: clinical decision-making in pediatric orthopedic surgery

OBJECTIVE

Identifying when and how often decisions are made based on high-quality evidence can inform the development of evidence-based treatment plans and care pathways, which have been shown to improve quality of care and patient safety. Evidence to guide decision-making, national guidelines and clinical pathways for many conditions in pediatric orthopedic surgery are limited. This study investigated decision-making rationale and quantified the evidence supporting decisions made by pediatric orthopedic surgeons in an outpatient clinic.

DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS/INTERVENTION(S)/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We recorded decisions made by eight pediatric orthopedic surgeons in an outpatient clinic and the surgeon's reported rationale behind the decisions. Surgeons categorized the rationale for each decision as one or a combination of 12 possibilities (e.g. 'Experience/anecdote,' 'First principles,' 'Trained to do it,' 'Arbitrary/instinct,' 'General study,' 'Specific study').

RESULTS

Out of 1150 total decisions, the most frequent decisions were follow-up scheduling, followed by bracing prescription/removal. The most common decision rationales were 'First principles' (n = 310, 27.0%) and 'Experience/anecdote' (n = 253, 22.0%). Only 17.8% of decisions were attributed to scientific studies, with 7.3% based on studies specific to the decision. As high as 34.6% of surgical intervention decisions were based on scientific studies, while only 10.4% of follow-up scheduling decisions were made with studies in mind. Decision category was significantly associated with a basis in scientific studies: surgical intervention and medication prescription decisions were more likely to be based on scientific studies than all other decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

With increasing emphasis on high value, evidence-based care, understanding the rationale behind physician decision-making can educate physicians, identify common decisions without supporting evidence and help create clinical care pathways in pediatric orthopedic surgery. Decisions based on evidence or consensus between surgeons can inform pathways and national guidelines that minimize unwarranted variation in care and waste. Decision support tools and aids could also be implemented to guide these decisions.

TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC FEMORAL FRACTURES IN THE CITY OF ZAGREB

Femur fractures in children can be treated with a number of operative and conservative methods. Numerous factors determine which method is optimal for a specific fracture. The aim of this research was to analyze distribution of femur fractures in children living in the urban communities of Zagreb and Zagreb County by localization, type and frequency of treatment methods used according to age and fracture mechanism. The research included 103 children aged up to 18 years, treated for femur fractures at the Zagreb University Hospital Centre and Zagreb Children’s Hospital. Data were collected from these institutions and a retrospective study covered the 2010-2015 period. The cause of fracture and diagnosis were coded with the help of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Operative treatment was applied in 55% of cases, which is contrary to previous researches. The highest incidence of femur fractures was recorded in the 0- to 4-year age groups, accounting for 49.1% of all fractures. These fractures mostly occurred due to falls and were more often treated with non-operative methods. All other age groups were mostly treated with operative methods. Coxofemoral immobilization and traction were used as non-operative methods, whereas flexible intramedullary nailing was the most frequently used operative method. The treatment depended on age, complexity of the fracture, fracture type, fragment displacement, and associated injuries. The cause was also an important factor on choosing the treatment method. Non-operative treatment was mostly used for fractures caused by falls (64.71% of cases due to falls) and operative treatment was mostly used for fractures caused by traffic accidents (79.4% of cases due to traffic accidents). It is a wide-known opinion that the best treatment for femur fractures in children is non-operative treatment. However, recent studies have shown that the use of operative methods in femur fracture treatment is growing. Our cohort of children treated during a five-year period (2010-2015) also underwent operative treatment more often than non-operative one. Two non-operative and eight operative methods were used. With such a large number of methods, it is clear that there is no unique method for all fractures. However, it is clear that the trend of using operative treatment is connected to the perennial trend of considerable sociodemographic and socioeconomic changes in urban settings such as Zagreb. Lifestyle changes directly affect the prevalence of femur fractures among children, as well as approach to treatment choice. General opinion is that most of fractures that occur at an early age can be treated with non-operative methods. Our research on femur fractures in children confirmed this rule. The youngest age group that had the highest incidence of fractures (49.1% of all fractures) was treated with non-operative methods in 75% of cases. Operative methods prevailed in other age groups. Similar results have been published by other authors. In conclusion, nearly half of all femur fractures (49.1%) occurred at a young age (0-4 years). Diaphysis fractures were most common. Most of the fractures that occurred during the 2010-2015 period were treated with operative methods, mostly in children aged 5-9 years. Out of eight different operative methods, elastic stable intramedullary osteosynthesis was most frequently used (60%). Coxofemoral immobilization and traction were used as non-operative methods.

Pediatric Open Both-Bone Forearm Fracture Stabilized with Titanium and Stainless Steel Stacked Extension Internal Plating: A Case Report

CASE

A 12-year-old male patient sustained a multisegmental both-bone forearm fracture. Definitive stabilization was ulna intramedullary pinning, with stainless steel plating of the radius followed by a titanium plate stacked atop and extending internal fixation. Currently, 36 months after surgery, he experiences no limitations or complications. All hardware remains in situ.

CONCLUSION

We believe this is the first description of different material plates in direct contact, of stacked plates, and of 1 plate extending another's fixation. No adverse effects developed.

Spica Casting Results in More Unplanned Reoperations than Elastic Intramedullary Nailing: A National Analysis of Femur Fractures in the Preschool Population

Background:

Spica casting and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) are treatment options for femur fractures in preschool-age children. Clinical practice guidelines are only of moderate or limited strength, which may lead to variation in practice. The purpose of this study was to compare the revision surgery rate in young children undergoing these procedures.

Methods:

The Pediatric Health Information System, a database of 49 children hospitals, was queried for patients aged 3 to 6 years undergoing spica casting or ESIN for a diaphyseal femur fracture. ESIN removal was not considered an unplanned revision surgery because the indication for removal could not be determined in the database. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate regression.

Results:

Analysis included 4,059 subjects with a mean age of 3.9 ± 1.1 years. Unplanned revision surgery was done in 227/2,878 children (8%) with a spica cast and 35/1,181 (3%) of those with ESIN (P < 0.01). Approximately 2% of children in each cohort underwent ESIN or open reduction and internal fixation as a revision procedure (P = 0.35). In multivariate analysis, spica casting resulted in 4.4 times higher odds of unplanned revision surgery than ESIN (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9–6.7; P < 0.01). In the spica cast cohort, each year of increasing age resulted in 1.3 times higher odds of revision surgery (95% CI, 1.1–1.6; P < 0.01). Children who were aged 5 or 6 years at the time of spica casting had 1.9 times higher odds of requiring a subsequent procedure compared with 3- and 4-year-olds (95% CI, 1.3–2.7; P < 0.01).

Conclusions:

In this large, nationally representative cohort, spica casting resulted in higher odds of requiring an unplanned revision surgery than ESIN, when nail removal was not included as an unplanned procedure. Spica casting in 5- and 6-year-olds yielded higher odds of revision surgery. Regardless of whether spica casting or ESIN is chosen as the initial treatment, 2% of patients will subsequently undergo ESIN or open reduction and internal fixation as a revision procedure.

Length unstable femoral fractures: A misnomer?

BACKGROUND

Flexible intramedullary nailing (FIMN) is relatively contraindicated for pediatric length unstable femoral fractures.

AIM

To evaluate FIMN treatment outcomes for pediatric diaphyseal length unstable femoral fractures in patients aged 5 to 13 years.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes pediatric patients (age range 5-13 years) who received operative treatment for a diaphyseal femoral fracture at a single institution between 2013 and 2019. Length unstable femur fractures treated with FIMN were compared to treatment with other fixation methods [locked intramedullary nailing (IMN), submuscular plating (SMP), and external fixation] and to length stable fractures treated with FIMN. Exclusion criteria included patients who had an underlying predisposition for fractures (e.g., pathologic fractures or osteogenesis imperfecta), polytrauma necessitating intensive care unit care and/or extensive management of other injuries, incomplete records, or no follow-up visits. Patients who had a length stable femoral fracture treated with modalities other than FIMN were excluded as well.

RESULTS

Ninety-five fractures from ninety-two patients were included in the study and consists of three groups. These three groups are length unstable fractures treated with FIMN (n = 21), length stable fractures treated with FIMN (n = 45), and length unstable fractures treated with either locked IMN, SMP, or external fixator (n = 29). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Patient characteristic differences that were statistically significant between the groups, length unstable with FIMN and length unstable with locked IMN, SMP, or external fixator, were average age (7.4 years vs 9.3 years, respectively), estimated blood loss (29.2 mL vs 98 mL, respectively) and body mass (27.8 kg vs 35.1 kg, respectively). All other patient characteristic differences were statistically insignificant. Regarding complications, length unstable with FIMN had 9 total complications while length unstable with locked IMN, SMP, or external fixator had 10. Grouping these complications into minor or major, length unstable with locked IMN, SMP, or external fixator had 6 major complication while length unstable with FIMN had 0 major complications. This difference in major complications was statistically significant. Lastly, when comparing patient characteristics between the groups, length unstable with FIMN and length stable with FIMN, all characteristics were statistically similar except time to weight bearing (39 d vs 29 d respectively). When analyzing complication differences between these two groups (9 total complications, 0 major vs 20 total complications, 4 major), the complication rates were considered statistically similar.

CONCLUSION

FIMN is effective for length unstable fractures, having a low rate of complications. FIMN is a suitable option for length stable and length unstable femur fractures alike.

Flexible intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: closed versus open reduction

Children's femoral shaft fractures are commonly treated with flexible intramedullary nailing after closed or open reduction, but there is little information concerning indications for open reduction. The purpose of this study was to determine radiographic and clinical features likely to lead to open reduction before flexible intramedullary nailing. Record review identified 158 femoral shaft fractures treated with flexible intramedullary nailing. In addition to patient demographics and mechanism of injury, data obtained included surgeon name, estimated blood loss, type of reduction, type and diameter of nail, type of operating table, the use of percutaneous reduction techniques or supplemental casting, time to and duration of surgery, total time in operating room, and time to union. Fracture ratios were calculated based on established radiographic protocol. Of 158 fractures, 141 were treated with closed reduction and 17 with open reduction. The anteroposterior fracture index (1.3 ± 0.4, P = 0.0007), surgeon (P = 0.002), and flattop operating table (0.05) were associated with open reduction. Smaller lateral diameter of bone at the fracture site, transverse fracture, and surgeon were all found to be independent risk factors for open reduction; patient characteristics, including age, sex, and BMI, did not seem to influence the choice of open reduction. Fractures with a lower fracture index or pattern resembling a transverse fracture rather than oblique or spiral had an increased risk of converting to an open reduction. Surgeon preference and use of flattop tables also had a significant influence on how the fracture was treated.

Elastic nail fixation versus plate fixation of paediatric femoral fractures in school age patients - A retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

The management of paediatric femoral fractures continues to spark debate in published literature, with poor quality evidence guiding current guidelines on the optimum treatment in children. Many centres report excellent results for both elastic intramedullary nailing and plate fixation of diaphyseal femoral fractures. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of femoral fractures treated with elastic nail fixation versus those treated with plate fixation in a tertiary children's trauma unit, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all femoral fractures undergoing fixation at a level one paeditric trauma and tertiary referral unit, between 1st April 2009 and 30th April 2017, was performed.Clinical notes and radiographs were reviewed to determine patient demographics and injury, operative and hospital stay data. Radiological union, defined as bridging callus present on at least three out of four cortices on orthogonal radiographs, was determined at 12 weeks. Outcomes were determined using the Flynn Criteria. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Data was statistically analysed, and a p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There were a total of 28 patients- 14 in each treatment group. Patients undergoing elastic nail fixation were significantly older than plate fixation (9.7 ± 1.9 Vs 7.7 ± 1.8; p = 0.008). A male preponderance was noted (21/28), with no difference between groups (10 Vs 11; p = 1.00). Plate fixation demonstrated a tendency towards shorter length of stay (6.3 ± 2.1 Vs 7.8 ± 3.0; p = 0.134), earlier radiological union at 12 weeks (14 Vs 10; p = 0.098), lower postoperative analgesia requirements (0.82 ± 0.45 Vs 1.12 ± 0.97; p = 0.200), and better outcomes, as determined by the Flynn criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In the authors opinion, plate fixation is a safe, effective alternative to elastic nail fixation with equivocal outcomes as determined by the Flynn Criteria. Plate fixation may offer advantages in shorter length of stay, reduced postoperative pain and earlier weightbearing. Further large scale, prospective research is required to determine whether these are borne out in practice.

Patient Safety Checklists: Do They Improve Patient Safety for Supracondylar Humerus Fractures?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether a safety checklist could be used consistently in an academic center, and, whether its presence correlates with a decreased rate of complications, and therefore, improved overall patient safety.

METHODS

Data from 3 years before and after the implementation of the checklist were compared. Prechecklist data from August 2008 through August of 2011, including all operative supracondylar humerus fractures treated at our institution, were retrospectively reviewed. Postchecklist data, from August 2011 to August 2014 were prospectively collected. Patients' charts and their imaging were all reviewed for: fracture type, nerve injury, placement of a medial pin, infection, loss of alignment, loss of fixation, and return to the operating room (OR). Patients who were within the checklist group were reviewed for checklist compliance and concordance of resident and attending-attested checklists.

RESULTS

Nine hundred thirty-one operative supracondylar humerus fractures were reviewed-394 in the prechecklist group and 537 in the postchecklist group. There was no significant difference in fracture type between the prechecklist and postchecklist groups. No significant differences were found between prechecklist and postchecklist patients in regards to loss of fixation, loss of alignment, infection, or nerve injury. In the postchecklist group, the number of medial pins placed was significantly less than in the prechecklist group (P=0.0001), but this was not found to have clinical significance. In the prechecklist group, 11 patients returned to the OR for a second procedure, whereas 4 in the postchecklist group had a return to the OR. This finding was significant (P=0.015), but the returns to the OR were not related to checklist parameters. The checklist compliance of the attending physicians was 85.85% and the residents were compliant 83.11% of the time. There were documented discrepancies between resident and attending checklists in 7.38% of all total checklists.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patient safety checklists are not necessarily affecting patient care in a clinically significant manner. It is important that we validate and refine these specialty-specific checklists before becoming reliant on them.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Treatment of Closed Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children Aged 6 to 10

BACKGROUND

Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures remains controversial, particularly in children between the ages of 6 and 10. In the current push toward cost containment, hospital type, and surgeon subspecialization have emerged as important factors influencing this treatment decision. Thus, in the present study, we use a nationwide pediatric inpatient database to compare the: (a) incidence; (b) demographic characteristics; (c) hospital costs; (d) length of stay; and (e) treatment method of pediatric closed femoral shaft fractures admitted to general versus children's hospitals.

METHODS

The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for all patients aged 6 to 10 who sustained a closed femoral shaft fracture in 2009 or 2012, and patient records were stratified into children's hospitals and general hospitals. Primary outcome measures included method of treatment, total hospital costs, and length of stay. Student/Welch t testing and χ analysis were utilized to compare continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively, between hospital types.

RESULTS

The total incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures decreased between 2009 and 2012 (1919 to 1581 patients; P=0.020), as did the proportion of patients treated in children's hospitals (58.6% to 32.3%; P<0.001). In addition, patients treated at general hospitals were more likely to receive open reduction with internal fixation (45.3% vs. 41.1%) or external fixation (4.1% vs. 2.3%), and less likely to be managed with closed reduction with internal fixation (32.0% vs. 39.7%) than those treated at children's hospitals (P<0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates a decrease in the incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures in 6- to 10-year old patients from 2009 to 2012, as well as decreased definitive management in children's hospitals and increased selection of operative treatment. In addition, treatment in a nonchildren's hospital was associated with decreased total inpatient costs and decreased treatment with closed reduction with internal fixation in favor of open reduction with internal fixation. Future studies should seek to identify the specific surgical procedures performed and match patients more closely based specific fracture pattern.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level II.

Factors Associated With Nonaccidental Trauma Evaluation Among Patients Below 36 Months Old Presenting With Femur Fractures at a Level-1 Pediatric Trauma Center

BACKGROUND

In 2009, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures, which recommended a nonaccidental trauma (NAT) evaluation for all patients below 36 months of age. A recent study of these guidelines found <50% clinical compliance with this treatment recommendation. We aimed to identify areas for improvement in compliance with this guideline.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients presenting to a single pediatric tertiary care hospital with a diaphyseal femur fracture from January 2007 to June 2013 who were below 36 months old. Medical records were reviewed for documentation of a NAT evaluation, patient characteristics, presence of other fractures or injuries, and hospital of presentation. Radiographs were reviewed for fracture pattern. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences overall and before and after CPG publication.

RESULTS

During the study period, 281 children below 36 months presented with femur fractures; 41% were evaluated for NAT. Overall, the following factors were significantly associated with receipt of a NAT evaluation: younger age (P<0.001), transfer from an outside facility (P=0.027), and identification of another fracture (P=0.004). Before publication of the CPG, nonwhite patients were much more likely to undergo NAT evaluation compared with white patients (43% vs. 19%; P=0.014). After publication of the CPGs, this differential disappeared (43% vs. 47%; P=0.685). Fracture pattern and patient sex did not influence receipt of NAT evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

We found poor utilization of NAT evaluation for patients below 36 months old presenting with femur fracture. Despite CPG publication, only modest improvements in this evaluation occurred over the study period, with less than half of all patients being evaluated. Younger children, patients transferred from other institutions, and patients presenting with concomitant fractures were more likely to undergo NAT evaluation. Compliance with the CPG may be improved by focusing on older children, patients who initially present to tertiary care centers, and those with an isolated femur fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Locking plate fixation in pediatric femur fracture: evaluation of the outcomes in our experience

Background and Aim: Femoral shaft fracture is a common traumatic musculoskeletal injures in pediatric population. The treatment of diaphyseal femoral fractures depends on age patient and pattern fracture. We present our record about the use of locking plate fixation and their outcomes. Method: We conduct a retrospective analysis in 22 patients, surgically treated for 26 diaphyseal femur fracture between 2008 and 2013. The mean age was 13 years. All the patients underwent a clinical and radiological follow-up for two years. We recorded time to weight bearing, time to union, complication (malalignment, dysmetria, infection), time to resumption to sport, plate removal, parents’ satisfaction. Results: All the patients had a minimal clinical e radiological follow-up of 24 months. The average fracture healing time was of 7.4 weeks. All the patients had a full hip and knee range of movements. Fifteen patients developed minor malalignment (varo-valgus or procurvatum femur) without clinical effects. No cases of infections. The mean time to a full weight bearing was 12 weeks and the return to sportive activity was 24 weeks. Four patients required a plate and screws removal. The average result of parents’ satisfaction was 8/10. Conclusions: Locking plate fixation is to be considered a successful way of treatment for pediatric femur fractures, especially in patients older than 6 years, head-injured or in the treatment of polytrauma. The anatomic and functional outcomes are comparable to those of other fixation techniques for this kind of fracture. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Submuscular plates versus flexible nails in preadolescent diaphyseal femur fractures

PURPOSE

To compare patient characteristics, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and complications after insertion and removal of submuscular plates (SMPs) versus flexible nails (FNs) for paediatric diaphyseal femur fractures.

METHODS

We reviewed records of 58 children (mean age, 7.7 years SD 2.0) with diaphyseal femur fractures who underwent treatment with SMPs (n = 30) or FNs (n = 28) from 2005 to 2017 (mean follow-up, 22 months SD 28). Patients with pathological fractures or musculoskeletal comorbidities were excluded. Alpha = 0.05.

RESULTS

Insertion of FNs was associated with shorter operative time (ß = -24 mins) and less EBL (ß = -38 mL) (both, p < 0.001) compared with insertion of SMPs, after adjusting for fracture type and time from beginning of study period. Removal of FNs was also associated with shorter operative time (ß = -15 min) compared with removal of SMPs (p < 0.001). EBL during removal was similar between groups (p = 0.080). The FN group had a shorter LOS after insertion (ß = -0.2 d) compared with the SMP group (p = 0.032). Four patients treated with SMPs and three treated with FNs developed surgical site infections. Two patients treated with SMPs and seven treated with FNs experienced implant irritation that resolved with removal. No other complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Compared with SMPs, FNs were associated with shorter operative time (for insertion and removal), less EBL (for insertion) and shorter post-insertion LOS in patients with diaphyseal femur fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Evidence-based Medicine in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Evidence-based Practice Committee Summary of Levels of Evidence, Clinical Practice Guidelines, Appropriate Use Criteria, and Best Practice Guidelines

The concept of evidence-based medicine has evolved over the past 2 decades, and has become a cornerstone to clinical decision-making in virtually every aspect of medicine. With a commitment to providing its members with high-quality evidence-based guidelines, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has instituted concerted efforts since 2006 to develop clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and appropriate use criteria (AUCs) for certain orthopaedic conditions. Many of these CPGs and AUCs detail the management of pediatric orthopaedic conditions. By the same token, members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) Evidence Based Practice Committee have been publishing succinct evaluations of randomized controlled trials in pediatric orthopaedic surgery to create an evidence-based repository for quick reference to available high-level evidence as well as resource to identify gaps in the current research and identify opportunities for future investigation. In instances where higher-level evidence needed to develop CPGs is not available to address a critically important clinical question, consensus recommendations from experts in the field have been obtained to develop best practice guidelines (BPGs). The purpose of this review is to provide readers with a deeper understanding of the key principles of evidence-based medicine and methodologies used for the development of CPGs, AUCs, and BPGs.

Flexible Intramedullary Nails for Femur Fractures in Pediatric Patients Heavier Than 100 Pounds

BACKGROUND

Flexible intramedullary nailing (FIMN) of femoral shaft fractures in children >100 pounds remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between patient weight and alignment at radiographic union following Ender's FIMN of pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

METHODS

An IRB approved, retrospective review of all patients who sustained a femoral shaft fracture treated by retrograde, stainless-steel Ender's FIMN was performed at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2005 to 2012. Preoperative radiographs were analyzed to determine fracture pattern, location, and isthmic canal diameter. Patient weight was measured on presentation to the emergency room. Radiographs at bony union were reviewed to measure shortening, coronal angulation, and sagittal angulation.

RESULTS

A total of 261 children underwent Ender's FIMN for femoral shaft fractures during the study period. There were 24 patients who weighed ≥100 lbs and 237 patients who weighed <100 lbs. There were no significant differences in sex (75% vs. 73% male), fracture stability (42.6% vs. 41.7% length unstable), or fracture patterns between the 2 groups. The ≥100 lbs group was significantly older (10.6 vs. 8.0 y, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in final coronal angulation (1.5 vs. 3.0 degrees), sagittal angulation (2.8 vs. 3.1 degrees), or shortening (3.4 vs. 3.5 mm) between the 2 groups. There were significantly more nail removals in the <100 lbs group (81.4% vs. 66.7%, P<0.01). Four percent of the population (10 patients) weighed ≥120 lbs and aside from age (11.4 vs. 8.1 y, P<0.01), there were no significant demographic or fracture pattern differences between this group and the remaining population. This heaviest group demonstrated no significant difference in shortening (3.3 vs. 3.5 mm), coronal angulation (0.8 vs. 3.0 degrees), or sagittal angulation (0.7 vs. 3.2 degrees) at radiographic union when compared with the lighter patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stainless-steel Ender's FIMN is an effective treatment for pediatric femoral shaft fractures in patients ≥100 pounds with excellent radiographic outcomes and no increased risk for malunion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Redefining Optimal Nail to Medullary Canal Diameter Ratio in Stainless Steel Flexible Intramedullary Nailing of Pediatric Femur Fractures

PURPOSE

The ideal canal fill for flexible intramedullary fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures is considered to be 80% based upon relatively few clinical studies. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between the summed nail to intramedullary canal diameter (ND/MCD) ratio and alignment at radiographic union following flexible intramedullary nailing (FIMN) of pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

METHODS

An Internal Review Board approved, retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who sustained a femoral shaft fracture treated by retrograde, stainless steel FIMN was performed at a single level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2005 to 2012. Preoperative radiographs were analyzed to determine fracture pattern, location, and isthmic canal diameter. ND/MCD ratio was calculated using the sum of the known nail diameters and the measured isthmic diameter. Radiographs at bony union were reviewed to measure shortening, coronal angulation, and sagittal angulation. ND/MCD ratio was analyzed to determine correlative factors with final radiographic outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 261 children underwent retrograde FIMN at an average age of 8.2 years (range, 2.2 to 17.0 y). ND/MCD ratio of ≥80% was seen in 108 (41.4%) patients. When compared with those with <80% ND/MCD ratio, there were no significant differences in age (8.8 vs. 8.0 y), sex (76.9% vs. 71.0% males), or body mass index (18.5 vs. 17.2 kg/m). There were significantly more length unstable fractures in the <80% ND/MCD ratio group (49.4% vs. 29.7%; P<0.01). Radiographic outcome was no different with respect to coronal angulation (2.7 vs. 3.0 degrees), sagittal angulation (3.0 vs. 3.2 degrees), or shortening (2.5 vs. 4.1 mm). ND/MCD ratio of ≥70% was seen in 176 (67.4%) patients and, when compared with the <70% ND/MCD ratio group, there were no differences in shortening (3.3 vs. 3.9 mm), coronal angulation (2.8 vs. 3.0 degrees), or sagittal angulation (3.0 vs. 3.4 degrees). Finally, 6.9% of the population (18 patients) had ND/MCD ratios <60% and did not demonstrate a significant increase in shortening, coronal, or sagittal angulation compared with groups with higher ND/MCD ratios. No group had an increased rate of infection, implant removal, nonunion, or need for reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large series of consecutive patients treated with retrograde stainless steel FIMN there does not appear to be any correlation between the ND/MCD ratio and radiographic outcome. Stainless steel flexible IM nails seem to maintain fracture alignment without an increase in complications at lower ND/MCD ratios than previously reported as "optimal."

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

V, RHH A, Khurana A. Current Concepts in Paediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures

Pediatric femoral shaft fractures account for less than 2% of all fractures in children. However, these are the most common pediatric fractures necessitating hospitalization and are associated with prolonged hospital stay, prolonged immobilization and impose a significant burden on the healthcare system as well as caregivers. In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive review of epidemiology, aetiology, classification and managemement options of pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

[Effectiveness of rigid interlocking nails through tip of greater trochanter for fixation of femur shaft fracture in adolescent]

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of rigid interlocking nails through the tip of the greater trochanter for fixation of femur shaft fracture in adolescent.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 23 adolescents with femoral shaft fractures treated between June 2011 and June 2015. Of 23 cases, 19 were male and 4 were female, aged from 13 years and 6 months to 17 years (mean, 15.2 years), weighed from 40 to 77 kg (mean, 53.5 kg). The causes were traffic accident injury in 13 cases, sports injury in 7 cases, and falling injury in 3 cases. Fracture located at the proximal 1/3 in 6 cases, middle 1/3 in 10 cases, and distal 1/3 in 7 cases; fracture was typed as transverse in 10 cases, oblique in 6 cases, spiral in 1 case, and comminuted in 6 cases. The course of disease was 3-17 days (mean, 6.2 days). At last follow-up, the leg length discrepancy, femoral neck shaft angle, femoral neck diameter, and articulotrochanteric distance (ATD) were measured on the X-ray films.

Results

Wounds healed in all patients, and no infection occurred. All patients were followed up 15-36 months (mean, 26.5 months). The patients had no pain and had normal gait, without lameness. The X-ray films showed bone healing at 5-13 months (mean, 6.5 months). No nonunion, delayed union, malunion of more than 5 °, or rotational deformity occurred. The removal time of internal fixations was 12-24 months (mean, 19.5 months) after operation. No heterotopic ossification, re-fracture, proximal femoral deformity, or femoral head necrosis occurred during follow-up. Two patients had early epiphyseal closure of greater trochanter, which had no impact on gait; leg-length inequality of less than 1 cm was observed in 2 cases. At last follow-up, the neck shaft angle, femoral neck diameter, and ATD of normal and affected sides were (131.7±6.3) and (132.9±7.8)°, (34.1±3.2) and (33.9±3.8) mm, and (27.8±9.2) and (26.5±8.5) mm, showing no significant difference between two sides ( t=-0.24, P=0.86; t=0.18, P=0.92; t=1.03, P=0.49).

Conclusion

It is a reliable and effective method to use rigid interlocking nails inserted through the tip of the greater trochanter for the fixation of femur shaft fracture in adolescent.

The management of paediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures: a modern approach

The definitive treatment of paediatric femoral diaphyseal fractures remains controversial. Modalities of treatment vary mostly according to age, with fracture pattern and site having a lesser impact. Current evidence is reflective of this variation with most evidence cited by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons being level 4 or 5. The authors present a review of the most up-to-date evidence relating to the treatment of these fractures in each age group. In an attempt to clarify the current trends, we have produced an algorithm for decision-making based on the experience from our own tertiary referral level 1 major trauma centre.

Extreme femoral valgus and patella dislocation following lateral plate fixation of a pediatric femur fracture

A 15-year-old boy presented with a 35° femoral valgus deformity, leg-length discrepancy, painful retained hardware, and a lateral dislocation of the patella 4 years after undergoing lateral plate fixation of a distal femur fracture. Femoral valgus is a possible complication of lateral plate fixation in up to 30% of pediatric distal femur fractures. With this patient's unusual combination of deformities as an example, we suggest early hardware removal after fracture union to prevent the development of deformity. If plate removal is not chosen, then continued close monitoring of the patient is necessary until skeletal maturity.

Fixator-augmented flexible intramedullary nailing for osteopenic femoral shaft fractures in children

Children with underlying metabolic bone diseases, such as osteogenesis imperfecta and spastic cerebral palsy, pose a challenge in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. We performed flexible intramedullary nailing with supplemental monolateral external fixation in a subgroup of such patients. The external fixator assists in controlling angulation and rotation at the fracture site, and avoids the need for supplemental casting with its associated problems such as skin breakdown and difficulty with personal hygiene. We describe the surgical technique, pitfalls, and outcomes in a series of four patients with underlying osteopenia treated with external fixator-augmented flexible nailing for femoral shaft fractures.

Impact of Clinical Practice Guideline on the Treatment of Pediatric Femoral Fractures in a Pediatric Hospital

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines are being developed for a number of topics in medicine to decrease practice variability and to improve evidenced-based care. Within orthopaedic surgery, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has a dedicated committee that produces these clinical practice guidelines on a variety of issues. One such issue was the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures, with the clinical practice guideline being published in 2009. We performed a retrospective review of the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures at a single institution from 2007 to 2012 to assess the clinical impact of this clinical practice guideline on the treatment of this condition.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients treated at a single pediatric hospital between 2007 and 2012 for a pediatric diaphyseal femoral fracture was conducted. The 2009 AAOS clinical practice guideline on the treatment of this condition was assessed and each patient record was analyzed to determine if the clinical practice guideline was followed, based on the age-specific recommendations. The percentage of treatment rendered adhering to the clinical practice guideline recommendations was compared in the pre-guideline group (prior to June 2009) and the post-guideline group (after June 2009).

RESULTS

A total of 361 patients were treated for a diaphyseal femoral fracture during this time frame and were included in this study. Overall, little change in treatment was found following the publication of this clinical practice guideline. The only significant change noted over this time period was a decrease (p = 0.03) in the percentage of patients between the ages of five and eleven years who were treated with flexible nails, at odds with this specific clinical practice guideline recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

We found little direct clinical impact of the recently published AAOS clinical practice guideline on the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures. This analysis suggests an important role for clinical assessment after guideline publication to identify areas of potentially important future clinical research and to assess the utility of this guideline.

[Femoral shaft fractures in children under 3 years old. Current treatment standard]

INTRODUCTION

Femoral shaft fractures in children are a common injury. Operative treatment is recommended for children above 3 years of age. The question of this investigation was the current clinical standard for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children under 3 years old.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An e-mail questionnaire was sent to all clinics and hospital departments of the members of the German Society for Trauma Surgery and the German Society of Pediatric Surgery.

RESULTS

Out of 775 clinics and departments, 121 participated in the survey (16 %). From 2011 to 2012 overall 756 femoral shaft fractures of children 3 years and younger were treated of which 375 (50 %) were stabilized with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN), 183 (24 %) with an overhead extension, 178 (23 %) with a plaster cast and 9 (1 %) with external fixation. Finally, operative treatment was used in 51 % compared to 49 % with conservative treatment.

DISCUSSION

Obviously, operative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children younger than 3 years is routinely used despite the fact that there is no evidential basis for this approach. There are good arguments for and against operative and conservative forms of treatment. Indications for operative treatment include multiple trauma, open fractures, body weight over 20 kg, child already free walking and lack of stable fixation with conservative treatment. To achieve more evidence for the existing recommendation of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Working Group of the Scientific Medical Specialist Societies), further investigations are needed.

An observational cohort study of the adoption of elastic stable intramedullary nailing for the treatment of pediatric femur fractures in Kumasi, Ghana

BACKGROUND

In high- and middle-income countries, elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the commonest treatment of femur fractures in children 5-11 years of age. At Komfo Anokye Teaching hospital (KATH) in Kumasi, Ghana, prior to this study all pediatric femur fractures were treated with skin traction to union. This study was designed to report the early results and costs of the adoption of ESIN at KATH to provide data to other low- and middle-income sites considering adoption of this surgical technique.

METHODS

An observational cohort study that included 84 pediatric patients ages 3-14 years presenting with closed femur fractures and treated with either skin traction or ESIN. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the rate of treatment success between treatment groups.

RESULTS

Treatment success (coronal and sagittal angulation less than 10 ° and shortening less than 15 mm at osseous union) was achieved in 92 % of the ESIN group versus 67 % of the skin traction group (odds ratio for ESIN group 9.28 (1.6-54.7); p = 0.0138). Average length of stay was significantly lower in the ESIN group (p = 0.001), but charges to patients were higher in the ESIN group (p < 0.001) because of the high cost of implants.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial experience of operative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children using ESIN was positive, with improved rates of treatment success and no surgical complications. Because of the high cost of implants, direct costs of treatment remained higher with ESIN despite reductions in length of hospital stay.

End caps prevent nail migration in elastic stable intramedullary nailing in paediatric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study using synthetic and cadaveric bones

End caps are intended to prevent nail migration (push-out) in elastic stable intramedullary nailing. The aim of this study was to investigate the force at failure with and without end caps, and whether different insertion angles of nails and end caps would alter that force at failure. Simulated oblique fractures of the diaphysis were created in 15 artificial paediatric femurs. Titanium Elastic Nails with end caps were inserted at angles of 45°, 55° and 65° in five specimens for each angle to create three study groups. Biomechanical testing was performed with axial compression until failure. An identical fracture was created in four small adult cadaveric femurs harvested from two donors (both female, aged 81 and 85 years, height 149 cm and 156 cm, respectively). All femurs were tested without and subsequently with end caps inserted at 45°. In the artificial femurs, maximum force was not significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.613). Push-out force was significantly higher in the cadaveric specimens with the use of end caps by an up to sixfold load increase (830 N, standard deviation (SD) 280 vs 150 N, SD 120, respectively; p = 0.007). These results indicate that the nail and end cap insertion angle can be varied within 20° without altering construct stability and that the risk of elastic stable intramedullary nailing push-out can be effectively reduced by the use of end caps.

Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the femoral shaft in children are relatively uncommon but serious injuries that disrupt the lives of children and their carers and can result in significant long-term disability. Treatment involves either surgical fixation, such as intramedullary nailing or external fixation, or conservative treatment involving prolonged immobilisation, often in hospital.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (accessed 16 August 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2013 Issue 7), MEDLINE (1946 to August Week 1 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2012 week 9), CINAHL (16 August 2013), clinical trials registries, conference proceedings and reference lists; and contacted trial authors and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing conservative and surgical interventions for diaphyseal fractures of the femur in children under 18 years of age. Our primary outcomes were functional outcome measures, unacceptable malunion, and serious adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened and selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for each outcome for each comparison using the GRADE approach. We pooled data using a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials (six randomised and four quasi-randomised) involving a total of 527 children (531 fractures). All trials were at some risk of bias, including performance bias as care provider blinding was not practical, but to a differing extent. Just one trial was at low risk of selection bias. Reflecting both the risk of bias and the imprecision of findings, we judged the quality of evidence to be 'low' for most outcomes, meaning that we are unsure about the estimates of effect. Most trials failed to report on self-assessed function or when children resumed their usual activities. The trials evaluated 10 different comparisons, belonging to three main categories. Surgical versus conservative treatment. Four trials presenting data for 264 children aged 4 to 12 years made this comparison. Low quality evidence (one trial, 101 children) showed children had very similar function assessed using the RAND health status score at two years after surgery (external fixation) compared with conservative treatment (spica cast): mean 69 versus 68. The other three trials did not report on function. There was moderate quality evidence (four trials, 264 children, aged 4 to 12 years, followed up 3 to 24 months) that surgery reduced the risk of malunion (risk ratio (RR) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.59, 4 trials). Assuming an illustrative baseline risk of 115 malunions per 1000 in children treated conservatively, these data equate to 81 fewer (95% CI 47 to 97 fewer) malunions per 1000 in surgically-treated children. Conversely, low quality evidence indicated that there were more serious adverse events such as infections after surgery (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.17, 4 trials). Assuming an illustrative baseline risk of 40 serious adverse events per 1000 for conservative treatment, these data equate to 56 more (95% CI 4 to 167 more) serious adverse events per 1000 children treated surgically. There was low quality evidence (one trial, 101 children) of similar satisfaction levels in children and parents with surgery involving external fixation and plaster cast only. However, there was low quality evidence (one trial, 46 children) that more parents were satisfied with intramedullary nailing than with traction followed by a cast, and that surgery reduced the time taken off from school. Comparisons of different methods of conservative treatment. The three trials in this category made three different comparisons. We are very unsure if unacceptable malunion rates differ between immediate hip spica versus skeletal traction followed by spica in children aged 3 to 10 years followed up for six to eight weeks (RR 4.0, 95% CI 0.5 to 32.9; one trial, 42 children; very low quality evidence). Malunion rates at 5 to 10 years may not differ between traction followed by functional orthosis versus traction followed by spica cast in children aged 5 to 13 years (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.12; one trial, 43 children; low quality evidence). We are very unsure (very low quality evidence) if either function or serious adverse events (zero events reported) differ between single-leg versus double-leg spica casts (one trial, 52 young children aged two to seven years). Low quality evidence on the same comparison indicates that single-leg casts are less awkward to manage by parents, more comfortable for the child and may require less time off work by the caregiver. Comparisons of different methods of surgical treatment. The three trials in this category made three different comparisons. Very low quality evidence means that we are very unsure if the rates of malunion, serious adverse events, time to return to school or parental satisfaction actually differ in children whose fractures were fixed using elastic stable intramedullary nailing or external fixation (one trial, 19 children). The same applies to the rates of serious adverse events and time to resume full weight-bearing in children treated with dynamic versus static external fixation (one trial, 52 children). Very low quality evidence (one trial, 47 children) means that we do not know if malunion, serious adverse events and time to resume weight-bearing actually differ between intramedullary nailing versus submuscular plating. However, there could be more difficulties in plate removal subsequently.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to determine if long-term function differs between surgical and conservative treatment. Surgery results in lower rates of malunion in children aged 4 to 12 years, but may increase the risk of serious adverse events. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing may reduce recovery time. There is insufficient evidence from comparisons of different methods of conservative treatment or of different methods of surgical treatment to draw conclusions on the relative effects of the treatments compared in the included trials.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Different methods of treating fractures of the shaft of the thigh bone in children and adolescents Although uncommon, fractures of the femoral shaft (thigh bone) in children may require prolonged treatment in hospital and sometimes surgery. This can cause significant discomfort and can disrupt the lives of the children and their familles. This review compared different methods of treating these fractures. Surgical treatment comprises different methods of fixing the broken bones, such as internally-placed nails, or pins incorporated into an external frame (external fixation). Non-surgical or conservative treatment usually involves different types of plaster casts with or without traction (where a pulling force is applied to the leg). We searched for studies in the medical literature until August 2013. The review includes 10 randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that recruited 527 children. Four trials compared different surgical versus non-surgical treatments; three compared different methods of non-surgical treatment and three compared different methods of surgical treatment. Generally we are unsure about the results of these trials because some were at risk of bias, some results were contradictory and usually there was too little evidence to rule out chance findings. Most trials failed to report on self-assessed function or when children resumed their usual activities. Comparing surgical versus non-surgical treatment. Low quality evidence (one trial, 101 children) showed children had similar function at two years after having surgery, involving external fixation, compared with those treated with a plaster cast. The other three trials did not report this outcome. There was moderate quality evidence (four trials, 264 children, aged 4 to 12 years, followed up for 3 to 24 months) that surgery reduced the risk of malunion (the leg is deformed) compared with non-surgical treatment. However, low quality evidence (four trials) indicated that there were more serious adverse events such as infections after surgery. There was low quality evidence (one trial, 101 children) of similar satisfaction levels in children and parents with surgery involving external fixation and plaster cast only. However, there was low quality evidence (one trial, 46 children) that more parents were satisfied with surgery involving an internal nail than with traction followed by a cast and that surgery reduced the time taken off from school. Comparing various non-surgical treatments. Very low quality evidence means that we are very unsure if the rates of malunion differ or not between children treated with immediate plaster casts versus with traction followed by plaster cast (one trial, 42 children), or between children treated with traction followed by either a functional orthosis (a brace or cast that allows some movement) or a cast (one trial, 43 children). We are very unsure if either function or serious adverse events differ between young children (aged two to seven years) immobilised in single-leg versus double-leg casts (one trial, 52 children). However, single-leg casts appear to be easier to manage by parents and more comfortable for the child. Comparing various surgical treatments Very low quality evidence means that we are very unsure if the rates of malunion, serious adverse events, time to return to school or parental satisfaction actually differ in children whose fractures were fixed using internal nails or external fixation (one trial, 19 children). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

External fixation for closed pediatric femoral shaft fractures: where are we now?

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in external fixation technique and pin design have sought to minimize complications such as pin site infection and premature removal of the external fixator. Although newer forms of internal fixation have gained popularity, external fixation may still have a role in managing pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to assess the time to healing, limb alignment, and complications observed in a cohort of pediatric patients with closed femoral shaft fractures who were treated with external fixation.

METHODS

Over a 15-year period, one surgeon treated 289 pediatric patients with femur fractures, 31 (11%) of whom received an external fixator. The general indications for use of an external fixator during the period in question included length-unstable fractures, metadiaphyseal location, refracture, and pathologic fracture. Six patients (19%) had inadequate followup data and four patients (13%) were treated with a combination of flexible intramedullary nails and external fixation, leaving 21 patients for analysis. Mean age at injury was 10 years (range, 6-15 years) and followup averaged 22 months (range, 5-45 months) after removal of the fixator. Radiographs were examined for alignment and limb length discrepancy. Complications were recorded from a chart review.

RESULTS

Mean time in the fixator was 17 weeks (range, 9-24 weeks). One patient sustained a refracture and one patient with an isolated femur fracture had a leg length discrepancy > 2 cm. There were no pin site infections requiring intravenous antibiotics or additional surgery. One patient with Blount disease and previous tibial osteotomy developed transient peroneal nerve palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvements in pin design and predictable fracture healing, complications such as refracture and leg length discrepancy after external fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures can occur. However, external fixation remains a viable alternative for certain fractures such as length-unstable fractures, metadiaphyseal location, pathologic fractures, and refractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the femoral shaft in children are relatively uncommon but serious injuries that disrupt the lives of children and their carers and can result in significant long-term disability. Treatment involves either surgical fixation, such as intramedullary nailing or external fixation, or conservative treatment involving prolonged immobilisation, often in hospital.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (accessed 16 August 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2013 Issue 7), MEDLINE (1946 to August Week 1 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2012 week 9), CINAHL (16 August 2013), clinical trials registries, conference proceedings and reference lists; and contacted trial authors and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing conservative and surgical interventions for diaphyseal fractures of the femur in children under 18 years of age. Our primary outcomes were functional outcome measures, unacceptable malunion, and serious adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened and selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for each outcome for each comparison using the GRADE approach. We pooled data using a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials (six randomised and four quasi-randomised) involving a total of 527 children (531 fractures). All trials were at some risk of bias, including performance bias as care provider blinding was not practical, but to a differing extent. Just one trial was at low risk of selection bias. Reflecting both the risk of bias and the imprecision of findings, we judged the quality of evidence to be 'low' for most outcomes, meaning that we are unsure about the estimates of effect. Most trials failed to report on self-assessed function or when children resumed their usual activities. The trials evaluated 10 different comparisons, belonging to three main categories. Surgical versus conservative treatment Four trials presenting data for 264 children aged 4 to 12 years made this comparison. Low quality evidence (one trial, 101 children) showed children had very similar function assessed using the RAND health status score at two years after surgery (external fixation) compared with conservative treatment (spica cast): mean 69 versus 68. The other three trials did not report on function. There was moderate quality evidence (four trials, 264 children, aged 4 to 12 years, followed up 3 to 24 months) that surgery reduced the risk of malunion (risk ratio (RR) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.59, 4 trials). Assuming an illustrative baseline risk of 115 malunions per 1000 in children treated conservatively, these data equate to 81 fewer (95% CI 47 to 97 fewer) malunions per 1000 in surgically-treated children. Conversely, low quality evidence indicated that there were more serious adverse events such as infections after surgery (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.17, 4 trials). Assuming an illustrative baseline risk of 40 serious adverse events per 1000 for conservative treatment, these data equate to 56 more (95% CI 4 to 167 more) serious adverse events per 1000 children treated surgically. There was low quality evidence (one trial, 101 children) of similar satisfaction levels in children and parents with surgery involving external fixation and plaster cast only. However, there was low quality evidence (one trial, 46 children) that more parents were satisfied with intramedullary nailing than with traction followed by a cast, and that surgery reduced the time taken off from school. Comparisons of different methods of conservative treatmentThe three trials in this category made three different comparisons. We are very unsure if unacceptable malunion rates differ between immediate hip spica versus skeletal traction followed by spica in children aged 3 to 10 years followed up for six to eight weeks (RR 4.0, 95% CI 0.5 to 32.9; one trial, 42 children; very low quality evidence). Malunion rates at 5 to 10 years may not differ between traction followed by functional orthosis versus traction followed by spica cast in children aged 5 to 13 years (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.12; one trial, 43 children; low quality evidence). We are very unsure (very low quality evidence) if either function or serious adverse events (zero events reported) differ between single-leg versus double-leg spica casts (one trial, 52 young children aged two to seven years). Low quality evidence on the same comparison indicates that single-leg casts are less awkward to manage by parents, more comfortable for the child and may require less time off work by the caregiver. Comparisons of different methods of surgical treatmentThe three trials in this category made three different comparisons. Very low quality evidence means that we are very unsure if the rates of malunion, serious adverse events, time to return to school or parental satisfaction actually differ in children whose fractures were fixed using elastic stable intramedullary nailing or external fixation (one trial, 19 children). The same applies to the rates of serious adverse events and time to resume full weight-bearing in children treated with dynamic versus static external fixation (one trial, 52 children). Very low quality evidence (one trial, 47 children) means that we do not know if malunion, serious adverse events and time to resume weight-bearing actually differ between intramedullary nailing versus submuscular plating. However, there could be more difficulties in plate removal subsequently.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to determine if long-term function differs between surgical and conservative treatment. Surgery results in lower rates of malunion in children aged 4 to 12 years, but may increase the risk of serious adverse events. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing may reduce recovery time.There is insufficient evidence from comparisons of different methods of conservative treatment or of different methods of surgical treatment to draw conclusions on the relative effects of the treatments compared in the included trials.

Rigid intramedullary nail fixation of femoral fractures in adolescents: what evidence is available?

Background

Femoral fracture in adolescents is a significant injury. It is generally agreed that operative fixation is the treatment of choice, and rigid intramedullary nail fixation is a treatment option. However, numerous types of rigid nails to fix adolescent femoral fractures have been described. Hence, the aim of this paper was to collate and evaluate the available evidence for managing diaphyseal femoral fractures in adolescents using rigid intramedullary nails.

Materials and methods

A literature search was undertaken using the healthcare database website (http://www.library.nhs.uk/hdas). Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify prospective and retrospective studies of rigid intramedullary nail fixation in the adolescent population.

Results

The literature search returned 1,849 articles, among which 51 relevant articles were identified. Of these 51 articles, 23 duplicates were excluded, so a total of 28 articles were reviewed. First-generation nails had a high incidence of limb length discrepancy (Küntscher 5.8 %, Grosse–Kempf 9 %), whilst second-generation nails had a lower incidence (Russell–Taylor 1.7 %, AO 2.6 %). Avascular necrosis was noted with solid Ti nails (2.6 %), AO femoral nails (1.3 %) and Russell–Taylor nails (0.85 %). These complications have not been reported with the current generation of nails.

Conclusions

Rigid intramedullary nail fixation of femoral fractures in adolescents is a useful procedure with good clinical results. A multiplanar design and lateral trochanteric entry are key to a successful outcome of titanium alloy nail fixation.

Treatment of pediatric femur fractures with the Pavlik harness: multiyear clinical and radiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Femur fractures account for 1.4% to 1.7% of all pediatric fractures. The use of the Pavlik harness has been described for infants; however, previous reports have included only short-term follow-up. This study describes the multiyear clinical and radiographic results from patients younger than 6 months of age treated with a Pavlik harness.

METHODS

The clinical and radiographic records were reviewed for all children under the age of 6 months who were treated with a Pavlik harness for an isolated femoral shaft fracture at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. Radiographs were obtained at final follow-up, as well as a standing full-length anteroposterior scanogram. Clinical examination was completed and inquiry regarding patient activity limitations, complications of treatment, and overall parent/provider satisfaction was made.

RESULTS

Ten patients with 10 fractures met inclusion criteria. The average age of the patients at the time of injury was 2.2 months. The average duration of Pavlik harness treatment was 43 days (range, 31 to 54 d). The average age at final follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 2.6 to 7.3 y). At final follow-up, average angulation was 3 degrees valgus (range, 0 to 8 degrees) and 5 degrees procurvatum (range, 0 to 24 degrees). Only 1 patient had a measurable leg-length discrepancy of 7 mm at final follow-up. There were no complications noted.

CONCLUSIONS

It is felt that pediatric patients have a significant potential for bone remodeling and that any angulation at the time of fracture union will remodel. Our study supports this notion as the final angulation at follow-up averaged 3 degrees valgus and 5 degrees procurvatum. In the patient group presenting with >20 degrees of angulation at the time of injury, final angulation averaged 5 degrees valgus and 11 degrees procurvatum. Treatment with the Pavlik harness provides for excellent clinical outcomes with a minimal complication rate. However, some patients, especially those presenting with a high degree of angulation, may have some degree of persistent radiographic angulation.

Complications of plate fixation of femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents

PURPOSE

This study aims to critically analyze the major and minor complications that may be associated with plate fixation of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures.

METHODS

The medical records of skeletally immature patients (6-15 years of age) who underwent plate fixation of a diaphyseal femur fracture at a tertiary-care level-1 pediatric trauma center between 1/2003 and 12/2010 were reviewed. Demographic and clinical information regarding the mechanism of injury, fracture type, and surgical technique were recorded. Radiographic evaluation of bony healing, hardware position, and deformity was performed throughout the study period. All intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Complication incidence and time from surgery to complication were described. Multivariate logistic regression and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the association between different variables and the occurrence of a complication. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were used to evaluate the freedom from a complication with longer follow-up.

RESULTS

Over an 8-year period, 85 skeletally immature patients (83 % males, mean age 10.2 years) underwent plate fixation for diaphyseal femur fractures. Overall, complications were identified in 11 patients (13 %). Major complications, defined as those resulting in unplanned reoperation (excluding elective removal of asymptomatic plate/screws), occurred in five patients (6 %) and included two patients (2 %) with wound infections requiring irrigation and debridement, two patients (2 %) with distal femoral valgus deformity (DFVD) leading to osteotomy and hardware removal, respectively, and one patient (1 %) with a 3-cm leg length discrepancy (LLD) requiring epiphysiodesis. Minor complications, defined as those not requiring unplanned operative intervention, occurred in six patients (7 %) and included two patients (2 %) with delayed union, two patients (2 %) with symptomatic screw prominence, one patient (1 %) with a superficial wound infection effectively treated with oral antibiotics, and one patient (1 %) with valgus malunion, which was asymptomatic at early follow-up. There were no intraoperative complications and no reports of postoperative knee stiffness, shortening, or reoperations to address fracture stability. Fifty-two patients (61 %) underwent routine elective removal of hardware without related complications following fracture union. Overall, complications occurred postoperatively at a mean time of 20 months (range 0-65 months), though major complications occurred at a later time point (mean 29.1 months, range 0-65 months) than minor complications (mean 12.5 months, range 0-40.1 months). Longer follow-up was associated with higher occurrence of a complication [p = 0.0012, odds ratio = 1.05, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.08].

CONCLUSIONS

The plating of pediatric femur fractures is associated with 6 and 7 % rates of major and minor complications, respectively. There were minimal long-term sequelae associated with the complications noted. This complication rate compares favorably with the published rate of complications (10-62 %) associated with titanium elastic nail fixation of similar fracture types. Most complications occurred >4 months postoperatively, with major complications occurring at a later time point than minor complications. Long-term follow-up of these patients is recommended to ensure that complications do not go undetected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Implant removal in children

PURPOSE

Implant removal in children is still a standard procedure. Implants may disturb function, and some theoretical long-term risks like growth disturbance, foreign body reaction, chronic infection and corrosion are used as arguments for removal. Implant migration or interference with any other orthopaedic treatment over the later course of life is also a matter of debate. On the other hand, the difficulty in removing single implants as well as possible perioperative complications has induced discussion about the retention of implants in childhood.

METHODS

The current procedures are exposed and the available literature on implant removal in children reviewed.

RESULTS

Actually, a clear recommendation does not exist. The current line of action still includes routine removal, as it is preferred by some authors, whereas others argue for a selective procedure. K-wires as well as intramedullary nails are usually removed because the ends may interfere with the surrounding tissue. Screws and plates can be retained if there are no local problems. The removal of external fixators is non-controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

Benefits have to outweigh the risks and complications in the individual case and the procedure should not require a more extensive procedure than insertion. It has to be an individual decision in view of the lack of evidence to support routine removal as well as to refute it.

Distal femoral valgus deformity following plate fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the frequency and potential risk factors associated with the development of distal femoral valgus deformity following plate fixation of diaphyseal femoral fractures in children.

METHODS

Records of eighty-five skeletally immature patients who underwent plate fixation of a diaphyseal femoral fracture at a tertiary-care pediatric center from January 2003 to December 2010 were reviewed. Demographic data and clinical information were analyzed. Radiographic measurement of the distance from the distal plate edge to the distal femoral physis and of the anatomic lateral distal femoral angle was performed. Development of distal femoral valgus deformity was defined as a change in the anatomic lateral distal femoral angle of ≥5° in the valgus direction. Logistic regression analysis and contingency tables were used to relate the development of distal femoral valgus deformity with retention of hardware, patient age, fracture site, plate-to-physis distance, and the location of a bend in the plate at fixation.

RESULTS

Midshaft fractures (45%) were more common than proximal or distal diaphyseal fractures. Intraoperatively, the plate was bent proximally or distally, or both, in 80% of the patients. Distal femoral valgus deformity of ≥5° was seen in ten patients, eight of whom had distal diaphyseal fractures. Three of the ten patients developed symptoms as a result of the distal femoral valgus deformity that required at least one unplanned additional surgical procedure. On the basis of the statistical analysis, patients with a plate-to-physis distance of ≤20 mm (relative risk= 12.77, p = 0.005) and a distal fracture (relative risk = 11.0, p < 0.001) were at a significantly higher risk of developing distal femoral valgus deformity. Although not clearly an independent factor, a distal bend was also found to be associated with distal femoral valgus deformity (p = 0.004) but was not predictive of the pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal femoral valgus deformity occurred in 30% of patients with distal diaphyseal fractures and in 12% overall. We advocate long-term monitoring of patients with femoral plate fixation, particularly those in whom the plate is placed ≤20 mm from the distal femoral physis.

Fractures and refractures after femoral locking compression plate fixation in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Locking compression plates (LCPs) are being increasingly utilized in fixation of fractures and osteotomies in the pediatric population. However, plate insertion or removal may pose a risk of femoral fractures or refractures. The goal of this study was to analyze failure patterns associated with LCPs and identify possible contributing factors.

METHODS

The sample included all patients who underwent fixation of femoral fractures or osteotomies utilizing straight LCPs at a tertiary pediatric medical center from 2004 to 2009. All were followed up until fracture union. The charts and radiographs were reviewed, and data on demographics, indications, surgical technique, and timing of plate removal were summarized. In cases of failure, the timing, circumstances, fracture location, and refixation method were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent 41 straight LCP fixations during the study period. The indication for surgery was acute femoral fracture in 25 procedures (25 patients) and elective osteotomy or limb lengthening in 16 procedures (12 patients). Thirty-five plates were removed after complete clinical and radiographic union. The time from plate fixation to removal averaged 13 months (range, 5 to 34 mo) in the fracture group and 17.6 months (range, 7.5 to 28 mo) in the osteotomy group. Five procedures (12%) were complicated by femoral fractures or refractures: 2 occurred after the index surgery-1 at the proximal screw and 1 through the original fracture site, with plate breakage. Three patients sustained refractures after plate removal, all at the original fracture or regenerate site: 1 after a fall and 2 spontaneously. The average time from plate removal to refracture was 18 days (range, 10 to 30). There were no differences in demographics, timing, or technique between patients with and without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LCPs are considered flexible fixators, they may carry the risk of overstiffness, similar to external fixators. Further clinical and biomechanical studies are needed to evaluate risk factors for fractures or refractures, particularly in children. There seems to be an increase in risk of refracture immediately after plate removal. Caution should be taken in the first weeks after plate removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Intramedullary nails for pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures in older, heavier children: early results

PURPOSE

A common treatment for pediatric femur fractures is intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion. Elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESINs) are often used for these procedures in heavier patients, but the potential for complications and malunion is greater. We describe here a rigid IMN specifically designed for adolescents, the adolescent lateral entry femoral nail (ALFN). The purpose of this study was to compare the recovery and complications for patients treated with ESINs to those treated with the ALFN.

METHODS

Our study design was a retrospective cohort study. We performed a review of medical records of 22 children ages 10-17 requiring surgical fixation of a femur fracture for a 2½-year period. Patients selected for the study had traumatic diaphyseal femur fractures and were treated with ESINs without end-caps or ALFNs. Our analyses evaluated injury, surgical, and outcome information for all patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were eligible for inclusion and were divided into two groups according to their treatment: the ESIN group with 7 patients and the ALFN group with 15 patients. We then performed a comparison of complications and recovery for these patients. The mean time to full weight-bearing was significantly less for the ALFN group (4.1 weeks; SD, 2.2), than the ESIN group (9.4 weeks; SD 3.9). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of major or minor complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Older, heavier pediatric patients treated for femur fracture with ALFNs had a shorter recovery time than similar patients treated with ESINs. However, the outcomes for both groups were satisfactory.

Management of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures

A variety of strategies are utilized for management of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures, depending chiefly on the age of the patient. Other factors that can influence the selection of a technique-which range from skeletal traction with spica casting to immediate spica casting, flexible intramedullary nailing, rigid intramedullary rodding, or plate fixation-are weight, fracture severity, associated injuries, and underlying medical or musculoskeletal conditions. The available evidence regarding technique, outcomes, and complications of the aforementioned treatment options remains largely insufficient, and, at times, conflicting, which contributes to the challenges in management decisions. Considerable controversy has arisen over several topics, particularly the optimal treatment for patients aged 5 to 12 years and accepted standards of treatment. This review is designed to provide perspective for some of the most recent influential literature on pediatric diaphyseal femur fracture treatment in light of established evidence and evolving controversies.