Outcomes following distal humeral fracture fixation with an extensor mechanism-on approach

Distal Humerus Morphological Analysis of Chinese Individuals: A Statistical Shape Modeling Approach

Objective

A detailed analysis of the morphology of distal humeral articulation can help in the creation of anatomic prostheses of hemiarthroplasty. This study used statistical shape modeling to evaluate the 3D morphology of the distal humerus in healthy Chinese individuals and to investigate the proper articular morphology differences.

Methods

A statistical shape model (SSM) of the distal humerus was created using CT scans of 106 survey‐confirmed nonpathologic elbows. In addition, the articular components of each principal component (PC) were selected and fitted on the mean mode. The Euclidean point‐to‐mesh distance of articular modes was calculated as a measurement the proper change in the morphology of the articulation.

Results

The first seven PCs jointly accounted for 80.9% of the total variation (44.4%, 12.2%, 7.9%, 5.9%, 4.1%, 3.4% and 3%, respectively). In the mean model, the distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles was 57.4 mm, the width of the articulation was 42.1 mm, and the angle of the transepicondylar line (TEL) and C line was 4.8°. The articular surface differences of the first PC were significant (RMS: 1.43 mm in the −3 SD model and 2.38 mm in the +3 SD model), whereas under other conditions, the differences were not remarkable despite the maximum deformation not exceeding 1 mm.

Conclusion

A novel method (SSM) was used to evaluate the 3D morphology of the distal humerus in healthy Chinese individuals and investigate the proper articular shape differences. We found the proper shape of articular surface basically transformed into one variation pattern which was relevant to the bone size, even though the morphology of distal humerus possessed complicated variation modes. The findings of this study can be helpful to design the next generation of elbow hemiarthroplasty in the future.

Triceps tongue versus olecranon osteotomy for intra-articular distal humeral fractures: a matched-cohort study

BACKGROUND

There are various approaches to the distal humerus when managing a distal humeral fracture, and controversy exists regarding which approach is optimal. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of the triceps tongue (TT) approach when used for osteosynthesis of AO type 13-A, B, and C distal humeral fractures. Secondarily, we aimed to compare the outcomes of the TT approach vs. olecranon osteotomy (OO) when used for osteosynthesis of AO type 13-C distal humeral fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with distal humeral fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation by either a TT or OO approach between 2007 and 2019 at 2 separate institutions. TT patients with AO type 13-C fractures were matched to OO patients at a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, and fracture characteristics. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, elbow motion, fracture union, complications, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients treated with the TT approach were assessed, and the matched TT and OO cohorts each comprised 15 patients. The TT group showed less blood loss (119.3 mL vs. 268.5 mL, P = .03), had greater maximal flexion (126° vs. 116°, P = .03), and achieved a larger flexion-extension arc (108° vs. 93°, P = .05) than the OO group. In the OO cohort, 27% of patients had complications directly related to the OO, and OO patients had a higher rate of postoperative ulnar nerve neuritis (33% vs. 0%, P = .04). There was no difference in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P = .08), procedure time (P = .2), total number of patients with ≥1 complication (P = .5), difficulty with union (P = .7), or number of patients requiring revision surgery (P = .7).

CONCLUSIONS

The TT approach is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of distal humeral fractures. When compared with the OO approach for AO type 13-C fractures, the TT approach did not differ regarding functional outcomes but showed increased range of motion, decreased intraoperative blood loss, and a lower rate of postoperative ulnar nerve neuritis. The TT approach should be considered as a safe and reliable first-line approach for intra-articular distal humeral fractures because it allows adequate visualization of the articular surface, eliminates complications related to osteotomy including delayed union or nonunion and hardware failure or irritation, and allows for easy conversion to total elbow arthroplasty.

Bilateral triceps tendon approach is flexible and efficient in the treatment of type C distal humerus fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess and compare elbow range of motion, triceps extension strength and functional results of type C (AO/OTA) distal humerus fractures treated with bilateral triceps tendon (BTT) approach and olecranon osteotomy (OO). At the same time, we are also trying to know whether BTT approach can provide sufficient vision for comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus, and whether it is convenient to convert to the treatment to total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) or OO.

METHODS

Patients treated with OO and BTT approaches for type C distal humerus fractures between July 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria include: (1) patients' age were more than 18 years old, (2) follow-up was no less than 6 months, and (3) patients were diagnosed with type C fractures (based on the AO/OTA classification). Exclusion criteria include: (1) open fractures (Gustillo type 2 or type 3), (2) treated by other approaches, and (3) presented with combined injuries of ipsilateral upper extremities, such as ulnar nerve. Elbow range of motion and triceps extension strength testing were completely valuated, when the fractures had healed. Assessment of functional results using the Mayo elbow performance score and complications were conducted in final follow-up. The data were compared using the two tailed Student's t-test. All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients of type C distal humerus fractures, treated by OO and BTT approach were retrospectively reviewed between July 2014 and December 2017. Fifty-five distal humerus fractures (23 males and 32 females, mean age 52.7 years) treated by BTT approach or OO were included in this study. There were 10 fractures of type C1, 16 type C2 and 29 type C3 according to the AO/OTA classification. Patients were divided into two surgical approach groups chosen by the operators: BTT group (28 patients) and OO group (27 patients). And the mean follow-up time of all patients was 15.6 months (range, 6-36 months). Three cases in BTT group were converted to TEA, and one converted to OO. Only one case in BTT group presented poor articular reduction with a step more than 2 mm. There were not significantly different in functional outcomes according to the Mayo elbow performance score, operation time and extension flexion motion are values between BTT group and OO group (p > 0.05). Complications and reoperation rate were also similar in the two groups. Triceps manual muscle testing were no significant difference in the two groups, even subdivided in elder patients (aged >60 years old).

CONCLUSION

BTT is a safe approach to achieve similar functional result comparing with OO. BTT were not suitable for every case with severe comminuted pattern, but it avoids the potential complications related to OO, and has no complications concerning with triceps tendon. It is convenient for open reduction internal fixation and flexible to be converted to OO, as well as available to be converted to TEA in elder patients.

Clinical outcome of AO/OTA type C fracture of the distal humerus using the expanded paratricipital approach and cadaveric comparison of the exposure of the paratricipital and expanded paratricipital approaches to the distal humerus

BACKGROUND

We investigated the overall clinical outcome of the expanded paratricipital approach in complex articular fractures of the distal humerus and the effect of lack of visualization in the surgical field. In addition, we performed a cadaveric study to investigate the expansion or limitation of articular access in the expanded paratricipital approach.

METHODS

Forty-one AO/OTA type 13C fracture cases treated using the expanded paratricipital approach at a single trauma center from 2013 to 2017 were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the overall clinical outcome and analyzed the effect of lack of visualization in the surgical field with the expanded paratricipital approach by comparing outcomes between 2 groups classified by the location of the main articular fracture (group 1, limited visualization; group 2, without limited visualization). The length of inaccessible and accessible articular segments were analyzed using 40 matched-pair elbows.

RESULTS

The average duration of follow-up was 15.1 months. All fractures (type C1 in 11 cases, type C2 in 21, and type C3 in 9) were radiologically healed at 3.2 months after surgery. No cases required additional surgery because of implant irritation. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 90.5. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 18.5. Among the 41 cases, the limited visualization group (group 1, n = 21) had a longer surgical time and higher percentage of nonanatomic reduction than group 2. Although the expanded paratricipital approach allowed more articular exposure than the conventional approach, there was still a 20mm inaccessible articular segment (30% of transepicondylar width) in cadaveric dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The expanded paratricipital approach can be used in type C1, type C2, and selective type C3 articular fractures of the distal humerus with favorable results. Relative to surgical times and achieving anatomic reduction, it is more successful in a fracture with a main articular fragment and with good visualization.

Reliable Method of Radial and Ulnar Nerve Identification During the Posterior Approach to the Humerus: A Clinical and Cadaveric Correlation Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability of using "fingerbreadths" and anatomic landmarks as reference points for predictable identification of the radial and ulnar nerves when using the posterior approach to the humerus.

METHODS

A systematic approach using "fingerbreadths" to mark and measure the skin before incision. Two markings were made: the first 4 fingerbreadths proximal to the lateral epicondyle (radial nerve location) and the second 2 fingerbreadths proximal to the medial epicondyle (ulnar nerve location). Once the posterior approach was made, the same fingerbreadths were used on the radial and ulnar sides to identify the radial and ulnar nerves within the deep interval. Measurements were taken at each stage in cadaveric specimens. Clinical correlations followed. Statistical analysis was performed comparing measurements (outer vs. inner) in both cadaveric and clinical specimens.

RESULTS

Thirty-two elbows evaluated in this study, 20 patients and 12 cadaveric specimens. In the cadaveric specimens, the mean distance of the radial nerve was 7.59 cm from the lateral epicondyle, SD ± 0.17 cm (P = 0.55), and the ulnar 3.68 cm from medial epicondyle, SD ± 0.63 cm (P = 0.302). In the clinical measurements, the radial nerve was 7.46 cm, SD ± 0.48 cm, never within 7.0 cm (P = 0.425), and the ulnar nerve was 3.14 cm, SD ± 0.31 cm (P = 0.051). Statistical analysis yielded no difference between skin marking and actual location in the deep interval, between cadaveric and clinical specimens, observer fingerbreadth widths, or between left or right arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of "fingerbreadths" is a reliable, efficient, and reproducible method of identifying both the radial and ulnar nerves during the posterior approach to the humerus.

ORIF of Distal Humerus Fractures with Modern Pre-contoured Implants is Still Associated with a High Rate of Complications

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify complications after operative treatment of distal humerus fractures with anatomic, pre-contoured, locking distal humeral plates. We hypothesized that these fractures have high complication rates despite the use of these modern implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2010 and 2018, 43 adult patients with a distal humerus fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) at a Level I trauma center. Pre-operative variables, including medical comorbidities, mechanism of injury, open or closed fracture, AO/OTA fracture classification (Type A, B, or C), and nerve palsy, were recorded. Intra-operative variables including surgical approach, ulnar nerve transposition, and plate configuration were recorded. Anatomic, pre-contoured, locking distal humeral plates were used in all patients. Various plating systems were used based on surgeon preference and fracture pattern. Post-operative complications including infection, nonunion, malunion, painful implants, nerve palsy, heterotopic ossification, stiffness, and post-traumatic arthritis were recorded.

RESULTS

Most fractures were Type C (53%). The posterior olecranon osteotomy approach (51%) and parallel plate configuration (42%) were used in most cases. At a mean follow-up of 15 months, the complication rate was 61% (26/43 patients). Among all patients, 49% (21/43 patients) required a reoperation. Elbow stiffness (19%) was the most common complication followed by nerve palsy (16%). There were four fracture nonunions (9%), deep infections (9%), painful implants (9%), post-traumatic arthritis (9%), and heterotopic ossification (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Distal humerus fractures treated with ORIF utilizing anatomic, pre-contoured, locking distal humeral plates have a high complication rate, with many requiring reoperation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Paratricipital approach for distal humerus fractures

OBJECTIVE

To report functional outcomes in a case series of distal shaft and distal humeral fractures (AO type 12 and 13) managed with open reduction and internal fixation using paratricipital approach.

METHODS

Patients who were intervened between May 2006 and December 2015 were included in the analysis. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) were used for functional assessment.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in this case series, eight (67%) of them were women. The average age was 46 (SD 22). Regarding the type of fracture, three (25%) were classified as 12A1, two (17%) as 12B1, two (17%) as 12B2, three (25%) as 13C1 and two (17%) as 13C2. At most recent average follow-up of 3, 4 years (DS 1,62), the results were: elbow range of flexion-extension 138,3º (SD 15,18), MEPS reached 85,8 (DS 11,7), DASH of 11,8 (SD 10,6) and the mean VAS 1,3 (SD 1,1). At the final evaluation, all fractures had healed. One case presented radial nerve neuropraxia, three cases paresthesias at the ulnar nerve territory, and all of these evolved positively and spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, posterior paratricipital approach is useful and safe for managing the open reduction and internal fixation. It may provide preservation of the triceps and promote an earlier rehabilitation. Functional outcomes were satisfactory in this case series.

Paratricipital two window approach for complex intraarticular distal humerus fractures: A prospective analysis of 27 patients

BACKGROUND

To investigate the utility and complications of paratricipital 2 window approach for complex intra articular distal humerus fractures (AO/OTA type C).

METHODS

Between December 2012 and September 2016 , 27 patients (male-14, female-13) having mean age of 39 years (range, 22-62 years) with closed intra articular fracture (AO/OTA 13 type C) were surgically managed using paratricipital 2 window approach. Fractures were fixed as per AO principles. All patients were followed up for 21 months (range, 12-28 months) prospectively. Functional outcome was measured using Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and complications were observed. Student t-test, Pearson co-relation coefficient and Kruskal Wallis test used for statistical evaluation.

RESULT

All cases unite by the end of 3 months. Mean flexion achieved was 120° and extension lag was 10°. Mean arc of motion was 111°. Mean pronation and supination was 70° and 77° respectively. MEPS and motion arc were weak negatively co- related with surgical delay and advancement in age. Post-operative transient ulnar nerve palsy and heterotrophic ossification (HO) was noted in 3.7% cases and infection occurred in 7.4% cases. Hardware prominence noted in 11.1% cases. Mean MEPS was 82. MEPS was excellent in 18.5%, good in 62.9%, fair in 11.1% and poor in 7.4% cases.

CONCLUSION

Paratricipital 2 window approach for these fractures had good functional outcome with fewer complications. We advocate paratricipital 2 window approach when dealing with these complex fractures particularly, in type C1 and type C2.

Does surgical approach affect outcome after fixation of intra-articular fractures of distal humerus? Retrospective cohort study from a level-1 trauma centre in a metropolitan city

Introduction

Fractures around the distal humerus fractures make up to 2% of all fractures. Complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures present as challenge to restore of painless, stable and mobile elbow joint. Surgical exposure to all critical structures is of paramount importance to achieve anatomic reduction. Conflict still persists regarding the choice of ideal approach. In this study we compare the effect of surgical approach triceps lifting vs olecranon osteotomy on the functional outcome after fixation of distal humerus fractures.

Methods

Non-funded, non-commercial, retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with closed distal humerus intra-articular fractures between 2010 and 2015 at our tertiary care level-1 trauma and university hospital. Patients >18 years of age with closed complex intra-articular distal humerus fracture were operated using one of the two surgical approaches, either triceps lifting approach (Group1) or with olecranon osteotomy (Group 2). Functional evaluation using quick DASH scores at 1 year of follow-up. Study is registered with ID:NCT03833414 and work has been reported in line with the STROCSS criteria.

Results

Out of 43 patients 16 were treated with triceps lifting approach and 27 with olecranon osteotomy. The difference between the mean quick DASH score for both groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.52) although higher for group 1. Complications were comparable for both groups but 2 patients suffered delayed union of osteotomy site in group 2.

Conclusion

Triceps lifting approach can be used equally efficiently for exposure of these complex distal humerus injuries with no comprise in visibility of articular fragments.

•

Complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures present as challenge to restore of painless, stable and mobile elbow joint.

•

Surgical exposure to all critical structures is of paramount importance to achieve anatomic reduction.

•

For long time, olecranon osteotomy approach was utilized to provide clear access to the joint.

•

This is at the cost of creating osteotomy and the risk of its delayed/nonunion.

•

Triceps lifting approach avoids this catastrophic complication.

Outcome following olecranon osteotomy versus paratricipital approach for complex intra-articular (AO 13-C) fracture of distal humerus: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

The paratricipital approach is a relatively new approach in a complex intra-articular fracture of distal humerus (AO13-C). The aim of this study was to ascertain this approach compared with the olecranon osteotomy approach. Also, we aimed to investigate whether advancing age and surgical delay yield a poor outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2015, 51 adult patients with closed AO 13-C-type fractures were included in the study and divided into 2 groups, that is, paratricipital approach (PT) group and olecranon osteotomy (OO) group. Patients were treated by 2 senior trauma surgeons. They were prospectively analyzed for outcome and complications. Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) was used to evaluate the outcome.

RESULTS

Of the total 51 patients (mean age, 41.6 years), 27 patients were in the PT group and 24 in the OO group. There was no difference in arc of motion (P = .513) and MEPS (P = .127) as well as complication rate (χ² statistic = 0.36, P = .54). However, specifically in the type C3 fracture, the PT group had a poor outcome for arc of motion (P = .002) and MEPS (P = .019) compared with the OO group. Also, age and surgical delay had a weak, negative correlation with arc of motion and MEPS. The association between age and surgical delay against arc of motion was statistically significant (P = .005 and .01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The PT approach and the OO approach can be used alternatively for AO 13-C1 and -C2 fractures with similar outcomes. However, in type C3, the PT approach yields a poor outcome in comparison with the OO approach.

Olecranon Osteotomy Approach for Complex AO-13C Fractures of Distal Humerus: A Prospective Analysis of 24 Cases

Introduction: Olecranon osteotomy is well described approach for complex intra-articular distal humeral fractures. In this study, we investigated the usefulness and complications of olecranon osteotomy approach for such fractures. We hypothesise that outcome is comparable in young adults and middle age group and also functional outcome is independent of fracture subtype following surgical fixation.

Materials and Methods: Between December 2012 and September 2015, twenty-four adult patients (male: 15, female: 9) having mean age of 41.4 years with closed intra-articular fracture (AO-13C) were surgically managed using olecranon osteotomy approach and were followed-up for a mean of 28.5 months (range: 22-35 months). Functional outcome was measured using Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and complications were observed. Statistical analysis was done using Student t-test and Kruskal Wallis test.

Results: All fractures united by the end of three months. Mean elbow flexion achieved was 123°, mean extension lag was 9° and mean active arc of motion was 114°. Mean MEPS was 87 (excellent: 8, good: 14, fair: 1 and poor: 1). Post-operative transient ulnar nerve palsy was noted in two cases, heterotopic ossification (HO) was in one case, infection in two cases, implant prominence in five and elbow stiffness in three cases. Motion arc was higher in young adults and MEPS was comparable in both age group. Functional outcome was also dependent on fracture subtype. Conclusion: The olecranon osteotomy approach for distal humerus fractures had good functional outcome with fewer complications. Joint congruity and fixation could easily be assessed intraoperatively.

[Effectiveness comparison between the paratricipital approach and the chevron olecranon V osteotomy approach in the treatment of type C3 distal humeral fractures]

Objective

To compare the effectiveness between paratricipital approach and chevron olecranon V osteotomy approach for the treatment of type C3 (AO/OTA) distal humeral fractures and investigate the details of operation.

Methods

Between April 2010 and September 2016, 36 type C3 (AO/OTA) distal humeral fractures were treated with open reduction and bicolumnar orthogonal locking plating fixation by paratricipital approach and chevron olecranon V osteotomy approach respectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups by approach, there were 17 cases in paratricipital group (group A) and the bicolumns and distal humeral joint surface were exposed by traction of triceps and olecranon, and the distal humeral joint surface of the 19 cases in chevron olecranon V osteotomy group (group B) were exposed by osteotomy of the olecranon and reversing of triceps. There was no significant difference in gender, age, dominant side, interval between injury and surgery, causes of injury between 2 groups ( P>0.05). Patients were followed up, the postoperative range of motion of elbow joint, strength, pain, and stability in 2 groups were documented and compared; the elbow joint function was evaluated according to Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS).

Results

The operation time of group A [(115.0±10.4) minutes] was less than that of group B [(121.0±12.3) minutes], but there was no significant difference ( t=–1.580, P=0.123). All patients in 2 groups got over 1 year follow-up and there was no significant difference of the follow-up time between 2 groups ( t=–0.843, P=0.405). There was 1 case of heterotopic ossification in each group; 1 case of incision infection in group A and 1 case of incision superficial infection in group B, and were cured after 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics administration. There was no other operative complications in the 2 groups. At 3 months after operation, all the distal humerus healed. At last follow-up, the elbow flexion extension range of groups A and B were (102.0±12.6)° and (99.5±10.1)° respectively, showing no significant difference ( t=–0.681, P=0.501). The MEPS scores of groups A and B were 82.9±7.3 and 81.3±7.2 respectively, showing no significant difference ( t=0.670, P=0.507); and the evaluation grade also showed no significant difference between 2 groups ( Z=–0.442, P=0.659).

Conclusion

By paratricipital approach and proper traction of the olecranon, the distal humeral articular surface can be exposed in the operation of type C3 distal humeral fractures, followed with same stable fixation after reduction, the effectiveness is equal to by chevron olecranon V osteotomy approach.

Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus-a review of the current practice

Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus are complex injuries that can considerably limit elbow function if not treated appropriately. Surgical management is indicated for most intra-articular distal humerus fractures with the goal of restoring elbow range of motion and function. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screws has been the preferred surgical option. Double plating is recommended for bicolumnar fractures and plates can be applied either parallel or orthogonal to each other. Surgical approach for ORIF of the distal humerus can be performed through an olecranon osteotomy, but other approaches that preserve the olecranon are also in use, such as the triceps-reflecting, triceps-splitting, paratricipital, and triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle approach. The ulnar nerve is identified during the approach, followed by either in situ decompression or anterior transposition. Elbow arthroplasty has also emerged as a viable alternative to ORIF for fixation of these fractures in elderly patients with poor bone quality.

Challenges and Solutions in Management of Distal Humerus Fractures

Background

Management of distal humerus fractures remains a challenge for trauma surgeons and advancements in treatment options continue to be made to achieve the best results for patients presenting with these complex fractures. Our aim in this article is to provide the surgeons with a detailed review of current literature to help them make an evidence based decision when faced with managing such complex injuries in their surgical practice.

Methods

This is a comprehensive review of the current literature that details various aspects of distal distal humerus fractures such as classification, surgical anatomy, surgical approaches, treatment options, choices of devices, outcomes and complications.

Results

With the advancements in techniques and equipment, there has been improvement in patients' outcomes following surgical management of these fractures and a large proportion of these patients are able to achieve pre-injury level of function. The contoured locking plates have enabled successful fixation of many of these fractures that were previously considered unfixable. For those not amenable to surgical fixation, total elbow arthroplasty and elbow hemiarthroplasty are considered as good alternatives.

Conclusion

Since the days where the 'bag of bones' technique was the preferred method of treating these complex injuries, techniques and outcomes have advanced greatly. However, they still present a significant technical challenge and need meticulous technique and experience to achieve optimal results.

Lateral Para-Olecranon Approach for the Treatment of Distal Humeral Fracture

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes of the lateral para-olecranon triceps-splitting approach for the treatment of distal humeral fracture.

METHODS

Ten patients (3 males, 7 females) with a mean age of 59 years were retrospectively reviewed. There were 2 A2, 3 C1, and 5 C2 fractures according to the AO/ASIF classification. Types B3 and C3 fractures were excluded from this study because the olecranon osteotomy approach was indicated to visualize the anterior fragment. The triceps was split at the midline, and the anconeus muscle was incised from the proximal ulna. The lateral half of the triceps along with anconeus was retracted laterally as a single unit. The distal part of the humerus could be visualized from medial and lateral windows by retracting the medial half of the triceps. The articular fragment was anatomically reduced and fixed temporarily with a Kirschner wire, and the reconstructed distal articular block was then fixed to the humeral shaft with double locking plates.

RESULTS

After surgery, average elbow flexion was 127° (range, 110°-145°), and extension was -10° (range, -20°-0°) at the average follow-up time of 12.4 months (range, 8‒20 months). Seven patients had normal muscle strength against full resistance (manual muscle testing grade 5), and the other 3 patients had slightly reduced muscle strength (grade 4). No articular stepoffs of more than 1 mm were seen on postoperative radiographs. There were no cases of triceps insufficiency and nonunion. The average (± SD) Mayo Elbow Score was 93.5 ± 5.8 points at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The lateral para-olecranon approach is useful for the management of selected fractures of the distal humerus, preserving extension strength and providing satisfactory clinical outcomes, with no risk of olecranon osteotomy-related complications.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of distal humeral fractures: midterm clinical results

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty is a treatment for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures; however, longevity of the implant remains a concern in younger, more active patients. Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (DHH) offers an alternative with multiple advantages.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 10 patients who underwent DHH for distal humeral fractures during a 4-year period (2008-2012) by a single surgeon. Patients underwent testing of range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand, visual analog scale, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Average patent age at surgery was 71.9 years (range, 56-81 years); average follow-up was 73.2 months (range, 36-96 months).

RESULTS

Patients maintained improvements in Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (mean, 89.23; range, 75-100) and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (mean, 33.71; range 11.2-55.1), along with no significant decrease in range of motion compared with 1 year after surgery. Mean visual analog scale was 2.43 (range, 0-5), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation was 74.14 (range, 50-100), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 72.14 (range, 48.33-100). Participants had an average flexion of 128.7° (range, 95°-142°), extension deficit of 27.1° (range, 0°-45°), supination of 79.1° (range, 45°-90°), and pronation of 73.3° (range, 50°-90°). No heterotopic ossification, elbow dislocations, or subluxations were observed. Complications included 1 fracture and 1 complaint of prominent hardware. Two patients died, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This midterm review suggests that DHH may be an effective treatment for certain distal humeral fractures. The data suggest that elbow range of motion and functional use are maintained from comparison with short-term studies. Additional studies must be conducted to further define the role of DHH for complex fractures of the distal humerus.

Distal humerus fractures: a review of current therapy concepts

Fractures of the distal humerus in the adult comprise approximately one third of all humeral fractures. Successful management of distal humerus fractures depends on correct reduction of the fracture, reconstruction of the articular surface if needed, stability and rigidity of the fixation, and appropriate rehabilitation. In this review, we evaluated the available literature and highlighted current therapy concepts. We assessed the evolution of internal fixation and elbow arthroplasty focusing on the established surgical approaches against the background of a growing incidence of distal humeral fractures in an aging patient population. Therefore evaluating the aspect and influence of age-dependent comorbidities like osteoporosis on successful treatment.

Functional outcome of intraarticular distal humerus fracture fixation using triceps-sparing paratricipital approach

BACKGROUND

Displaced intraarticular distal humerus fracture has been conventionally treated operatively with various triceps disrupting approaches. These approaches are associated with several complications, such as triceps weakness, nonunion or delayed union of osteotomy, implant prominence, and delayed mobilization of the elbow. We present the functional outcome of intraarticular distal humerus fracture fixation using a triceps-sparing paratricipital approach which allows early elbow mobilization and preserving triceps strength.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty five patients with intraarticular distal humerus fracture were operated using triceps-sparing paratricipital approach with orthogonal plate construct. There were 16 male and 9 female patients and average age was 42.16 years (range 23-65 years). The mechanism of injury was fall from height (n = 8), road traffic accident (n = 13) and ground level fall (n = 4). Clinical, radiological, and functional assessment with Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) were obtained at follow up period.

RESULTS

All fractures united primarily. At the mean follow up of 13.58 months (range 6-22 months), mean elbow flexion was 121.08° (range 94°-142°) and mean motion arc was 114.92°(range 65°-140°). The mean MEPI score was 94.40 points (range 70-100) with 17 excellent, five good, and three fair results. The mean flexion deformity or extension loss was 6.16° (range 5°-15°).

CONCLUSION

Open reduction and internal fixation of intraarticular distal humerus fractures with triceps-sparing paratricipital approach provide adequate exposure with no adverse effect on triceps muscle strength and allows early initiation of elbow motion. We analyzed, age and injury to surgical interval with relation to functional range of elbow using Z-test which is insignificant.

Triceps-sparing approach for open reduction and internal fixation of neglected displaced supracondylar and distal humeral fractures in children

Background

Supracondylar humeral fractures are one of the most common skeletal injuries in children. In cases of displacement and instability, the standard procedure is early closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. However, between 10 and 20 % of patients present late. According to the literature, patients with neglected fractures are those patients who presented for treatment after 14 days of injury. The delay is either due to lack of medical facilities or social and financial constraints. The neglected cases are often closed injuries with no vascular compromise. However, the elbow may still be tense and swollen with abrasions or crusts. In neglected cases, especially after early appearance of callus, there is no place for closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Traditionally, distal humeral fractures have been managed with surgical approaches that disrupt the extensor mechanism with less satisfactory functional outcome due to triceps weakness and elbow stiffness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of delayed open reduction using the triceps-sparing approach and Kirschner wire fixation for treatment of neglected, displaced supracondylar and distal humeral fractures in children.

Materials and methods

This prospective study included 15 children who had neglected displaced supracondylar and distal humeral fractures. All patients were completely evaluated clinically and radiologically before intervention, after surgery and during the follow-up. The follow-up period ranged from 8 to 49 months, with a mean period of 17 months. Functional outcome was evaluated according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and Mark functional criteria.

Results

All fractures united in a mean duration of 7.2 weeks (range 5–10 weeks) with no secondary displacement or mal-union. Excellent results were found at the last follow-up in 13 of the 15 patients studied (86.66 %), while good results were found in two patients (13.33 %) according to the MEPI scale. According to the Mark functional criteria, there was one patient with a fair result (6.66 %).

Conclusion

The results were very satisfactory if compared with traditional operative techniques, with many advantages including anatomical reduction and fixation of the fractures, avoidance of ulnar nerve injury, preservation of the extensor mechanism, decrease in incidence of myositis ossificans around the elbow and decrease in post-operative stiffness.

Level of evidence

IV.

Comparison of outcomes after triceps split versus sparing surgery for extra-articular distal humerus fractures

OBJECTIVES

To compare elbow range of motion (ROM), triceps extension strength, and functional outcome of AO/OTA type A distal humerus fractures treated with a triceps-split or -sparing approach.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Two level one trauma centres.

PATIENTS

Sixty adult distal humerus fractures (AO/OTA 13A2, 13A3) presenting between 2008 and 2012 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria removed 18 total patients from analysis and three patients died before final follow-up.

INTERVENTION

Patients were divided into two surgical approach groups chosen by the treating surgeon: triceps split (16 patients) or triceps sparing (23 patients).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Elbow ROM and triceps extension strength testing were completed in patients after fractures had healed. All patients were also given the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Compared to the triceps-split cohort, the triceps-sparing cohort had greater elbow flexion (sparing 143 ± 7° compared to split 130 ± 12°, p=0.03) and less extension contracture (sparing 6 ± 8° compared to split 23 ± 4°, p<0.0001). Triceps strength compared to the uninjured arm also favoured the triceps-sparing cohort (sparing 88.9 ± 28.3% compared to split 49.4 ± 17.0%, p=0.007). DASH scores were not statistically significant between the two cohorts (sparing 14.5 ± 12.2 compared to split 23.6 ± 22.3, p=0.333).

CONCLUSIONS

A triceps-sparing approach for surgical treatment of extra-articular distal humerus fractures can result in better elbow ROM and triceps strength than a triceps-splitting approach. Both approaches, however, result in reliable union and similar functional outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparing approaches to expose type C fractures of the distal humerus for ORIF in elderly patients: six years clinical experience with both the triceps-sparing approach and olecranon osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Although open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a standard fracture treatment method, the optimal way to expose a fracture prior to ORIF is debated. We compared the effects of two exposure methods, the triceps-sparing approach and olecranon osteotomy, on the functional outcomes of ORIF-treated type C distal humerus fractures in elderly people.

METHODS

From January 2006 to January 2011, 75 elderly patients with type C distal humerus fractures were treated with ORIF, and we retrospectively reviewed their medical records, radiographs, and follow-up charts to identify any complications. Patients' Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and range of motion were determined at their final clinic visit.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (89 %) attended the final visit. Of these patients, 36 received olecranon osteotomy and 31 received the triceps-sparing approach. For patients with type C1 and C2 fractures, we observed reductions in procedure times, blood loss, complication rates, and MEPS outcomes (all P < 0.01) with the triceps-sparing approach compared with olecranon osteotomy. Except for MEPS outcomes, all of these approach-related improvements were also statistically significantly for type C3 fractures (all P < 0.01). Overall, we did not observe any cases of fracture nonunion, implantation breakage or loosening, or elbow stiffening in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found better functional outcomes for type C1 and C2 distal humerus fractures that were exposed using the triceps-sparing approach rather than olecranon osteotomy. Even for the most complex type of fracture, C3 fractures, similar recoveries in elbow function were achieved using either approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Exposure of the distal humerus using a triceps hemi-peel approach

This study evaluates the exposure of the distal humerus articular surface obtained using a triceps hemi-peel approach versus the triceps-flexor carpi ulnaris (TRIFCU) approach. Twelve cadaveric upper extremity specimens were dissected using a lateral-to-medial hemi-peel modification of the TRIFCU approach to the elbow. After completing the hemi-peel exposure, the visible border of the articular surface was marked with a permanent ink pen. The dissection was continued to complete a standard TRIFCU approach, and the visible border of the exposure was again marked. The elbow was disarticulated, and calibrated digital images were taken to quantify the humeral surface area exposed through each approach. During both approaches, the surgeon's ability to visualize the intertrochlear groove, medial crista anterior crest, medial crista posterior crest, anterior capitulum, and posterior capitulum was recorded. No difference was found in the surgeons' ability to identify the 5 designated anatomic landmarks using the hemi-peel versus the TRIFCU approach. The TRIFCU exposed an average of 6.68 cm(2) of the trochlear articular surface, whereas the hemi-peel approach exposed an average of 5.93 cm(2). The average difference between the exposures was 0.75 cm(2) (P<.001), or 12.5%. The hemi-peel and TRIFCU approaches to the elbow both allow excellent visualization of the distal humerus articular surface. The hemi-peel exposure is a useful approach for the accurate reduction and fixation of displaced intra-articular distal humerus fractures.

Results of parallel plate fixation of comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the results of parallel plate fixation of comminuted distal humeral fractures in a consecutive series of patients.

METHODS

Parallel plate fixation was used in 47 patients (30 women), mean age 60 years (range 18-98 years), with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) type C distal humeral fractures during 2007 to 2011. Medical records and radiographs were retrospectively assessed. Thirty-five patients completed Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure and the RAND Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey. Twenty-seven patients underwent clinical examination, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) rating, and radiography after 3.9 years (range, 1.6-7.9 years) of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean flexion arc was lower on the affected side vs the unaffected elbow (123° vs 140°, P = .03). The mean MEPS was 88; the result was excellent in 14, good in 8, fair in 3, and poor in 2 patients. DASH results indicated slight impairment of upper extremity function compared with the reference value (26 vs 10, P = .001). RAND SF-36 scores indicated normal quality of life compared with reference values from the Finnish population. Forty-four fractures united uneventfully. One case each of nonunion and malunion occurred. One olecranon osteotomy failed to unite. There were 3 cases of infection. Prominent hardware was a common late problem, and plates often required removal. The complication rate was 7 of 47 (15%); 4 of these patients (9%) required reoperation. The hardware removal rate was 13 of 47 (28%).

CONCLUSION

Parallel plate fixation is an effective method to treat comminuted distal humeral fractures. Good elbow function can be restored in most cases with minor impairments that do not worsen quality of life.

Percutaneous K-wire fixation in paediatric Supracondylar fractures of humerus: A retrospective study

Background:

Supracondylar fractures are the commonest elbow injury in children. Most displaced Supracondylar fractures are manipulated and held with a medial/lateral entry or two lateral Kirschner wires. It was the purpose of this study to investigate the treatment of this injury in this unique patient population.

Materials and Methods:

This study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic surgery in M. M. Medical College from July 2005 to July 2010. One hundred seventy patients were recruited from Emergency and outpatient department having closed displaced Supracondylar fractures of humerus in children. They were treated either with medial-lateral pin fixation (n = 85) or with 2-lateral pin fixation (n = 85). All patients were operated under general anaesthesia. All patients were followed for 6 months. Results were analysed using Flynn's criteria.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Chi Square Test. Chi Square calculator was used as a software.

Results:

All children achieved union in a mean time of 4 weeks (range: 3-6 weeks). Post-operatively, eight patients (4.70%) got ulnar nerve injury and six (3.52%) patients got pin tract infection. Comparison between two groups such as cross K-wire group (85) and lateral K-wire group (n = 85) by using the Chi Square Test showed that in case of 8 weeks with (P-values = 0.89), in 16 weeks (P = 0.91) and 24 weeks (P = 0.85) with respective excellent, good, fair and poor categories were not found statistically significant.

Conclusion:

The lateral percutaneous pinning technique of displaced Supracondylar fractures of the humerus offers a viable alternative to the crossed pinning group as it offers the same stability without the incipient risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.

Posttraumatic elbow joint contractures: defining pathologic capsular mechanisms and potential future treatment paradigms

The Andrew J. Weiland Medal is presented by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand to a midcareer researcher who is dedicated to advancing patient care in the field of hand surgery. This essay, awarded the Weiland Medal in 2012, focuses on posttraumatic elbow joint contractures. Joint contractures are well known to hand surgeons because they limit function of our patients. There is a thorough understanding of the pathoanatomy underlying joint contractures. However, the mechanisms leading to the pathoanatomy are either unknown or partially understood, depending on the etiology of the particular clinical condition. This review describes our research over the past 14 years on posttraumatic elbow joint contractures. It defines pathologic cellular, matrix, and growth factor changes in the joint capsule, elaborates on the development of an animal model of posttraumatic joint contractures, presents an evaluation of a potential prevention strategy based on our research, and outlines future plans to bring this work to the clinical realm for the benefit of patients.

Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of distal humerus fractures: short-term clinical results

Total elbow arthroplasty is the current gold standard of treatment for unreconstructable distal humerus fractures; however, longevity of the implant remains a concern in younger, more active patients. Distal humerus hemiarthroplasty offers an alternative and may allow for more durable results. The authors retrospectively evaluated the short-term clinical outcomes of 10 patients who underwent elbow hemiarthroplasty for distal humerus fractures. This short-term review suggests that distal humerus hemiarthroplasty may be an effective treatment for certain distal humerus fractures. Additional studies must be conducted to further define the role of elbow hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex fractures of the distal humerus.

Distal Humeral Fracture Fixation with an Extensor Mechanism-on Approach

Introduction

Open treatment of extra-articular and intra-articular distal humeral fractures can be effectively accomplished through an extensor mechanism-on approach.

Step 1 Preoperative Planning

Assess all images for multiplane fracture lines involving the capitellum or trochlea.

Step 2 Operative Setup

Verify with fluoroscopy that the patient and arm positions allow for adequate imaging of the distal part of the humerus.

Step 3 Surgical Approach

Perform medial and lateral arthrotomies posterior to the collateral ligament complexes and excise the intra-articular fat pad and posterior aspect of the capsule.

Step 4 Fracture Reduction and Provisional Fixation

Reduce the distal humeral fragments anatomically under direct visualization posteriorly and indirectly with fluoroscopy using the intact sigmoid notch as a template for reduction.

Step 5 Definitive Fixation

Place multiple screws distally through the plates medially and laterally; each screw should be of maximal length and engage the opposite column.

Step 6 Wound Closure and Postoperative Management

Remove the dressing on postoperative day two and begin full active-assisted elbow range of motion and grip-strengthening therapy program.

Results

In our series of thirty-seven patients¹², all fractures healed primarily with a median motion arc of 126° (range, 60° to 141°). The median triceps strength loss was 10% (range, 0% to 49%).

What to Watch For

IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.