Predictability of Acetabular Component Angular Change with Postural Shift from Standing to Sitting Position

Decreased Instability in High-Risk (Hip-Spine 2B) Patients After Modifications of Surgical Planning and Technique

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) who have spinal deformity and a stiff spine are the highest-risk group for instability. Despite the increasing use of dual-mobility cups and large femoral heads, dislocation remains a major complication after THA. Preoperative planning becomes a critical aspect of ensuring precise component positioning within a safe zone. The purpose of this study was to investigate dislocation rates over a 9-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 4,731 THAs performed by 3 orthopaedic surgeons between January 2014 and March 2023 was performed. Spinopelvic measurements were conducted to determine the hip-spine classification group for each patient. Only patients classified as 2B (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis > 10° and Δsacral slope < 10°) were eligible. Both absolute and relative dislocation frequencies were then analyzed using time-series analysis techniques and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

A total of 281 hip-spine 2B patients undergoing primary THA were eligible for analysis (57% women; mean age, range: 66 years, 23 to 87; mean body mass index, range: 28, 16 to 45). The overall dislocation rate was 4.3%. Use of femoral head sizes ≥ 40 mm increased from 4% in 2014 to 2019 to 37% in 2020 to 2023 (P < .001), while the use of dual-mobility cups decreased from 100% in 2014 to 2019 to 37% in 2020 to 2023 (P < .001). Acetabular component planning was changed from the supine plane to the standing plane in February 2020. Those changes in surgical practice were notably correlated with a significant decrease in dislocation rates from 6.8% in 2014 to 2019 to 1.5% in 2020 to 2023 (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the introduction of advanced preoperative THA planning to the standing plane, coupled with precise intraoperative technology for implant placement, can significantly reduce the risk of instability in high-risk THA patients. Notably, we observed a significant decrease in dislocation rates, which aligned with the shift in surgical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Dual-mobility with modular components for primary total hip arthroplasty in bilateral bony ankylosis of the hips: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a procedure performed in the United States for a variety of indications, with operation rates slated to increase over 275 % by 2040 when compared to 2014 (Thilak et al., 2015). Dual-mobility (DM) implants have gained popularity in the United States since gaining approval in the early 2010s (Heckmann et al., 2020). It has been well reported that DM implants decrease the risk of dislocation after primary and revision THA (Vielpeau et al., 2011; Donovan et al., 2022; Heifner et al., 2023; Foissey et al., 2023; Schmidt et al., 2020; Neri et al., 2019).

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 33-year-old male with a suspected ankylosing spondylitis (AS) diagnosis and bilateral bony ankylosis of the hips who underwent staged THA with modular dual-mobility (MDM) implants. At one year post-operatively, the patient is walking without the use of an assistive device and reports a VAS pain score of 0 at rest and 2 with activity and HHS of 90.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Implant selection is important in this patient population due to the increased risk of dislocation. Contemporary reports reveal MDM implants have demonstrated a substantial reduction in dislocation risk compared to fixed-bearing implants in patients with a high risk of dislocation. We opted to place the acetabular component inside the safe zone to improve stability and use the dual-mobility prosthesis to achieve our desired range of motion.

CONCLUSION

The improved stability of DM implants allows for a greater range of acetabular positions in patients who have a highly unpredictable functional outcome at the time of surgery. Our preliminary results contribute to the growing list of indications for MDM total hip arthroplasty.

Hip-spine parameters change with increasing age

Aims

Spinopelvic pathology increases the risk for instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet few studies have evaluated how pathology varies with age or sex. The aims of this study were: 1) to report differences in spinopelvic parameters with advancing age and between the sexes; and 2) to determine variation in the prevalence of THA instability risk factors with advancing age.

Methods

A multicentre database with preoperative imaging for 15,830 THA patients was reviewed. Spinopelvic parameter measurements were made by experienced engineers, including anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPT), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI). Lumbar flexion (LF), sagittal spinal deformity, and hip user index (HUI) were calculated using parameter measurements.

Results

With advancing age, patients demonstrate increased posterior APPT, decreased standing LL, decreased LF, higher pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, higher prevalence of abnormal spinopelvic mobility, and higher HUI percentage. With each decade, APPT progressed posteriorly 2.1°, LF declined 6.0°, PI-LL mismatch increased 2.9°, and spinopelvic mobility increased 3.8°. Significant differences were found between the sexes for APPT, SPT, SS, LL, and LF, but were not felt to be clinically relevant.

Conclusion

With advancing age, spinopelvic biomechanics demonstrate decreased spinal mobility and increased pelvic/hip mobility. Surgeons should consider the higher prevalence of instability risk factors in elderly patients and anticipate changes evolving in spinopelvic biomechanics for young patients.

"Stuck in the middle": the missing lumbosacral link in total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic mobility drives functional acetabular position, influencing dislocation risk after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients have been described as "stuck sitting" or "stuck standing" based on pelvic tilt (PT). We hypothesised that some patients are "stuck in the middle," meaning their PT changes minimally from sitting to standing - increasing their risk of dislocation.

METHODS

We reviewed 195 patients with standing and sitting whole body radiographs prior to THA. Standing anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPT) and standing and sitting sacral slope (SS) were measured and used to calculate sitting APPT. Normal standing and sitting were defined as APPT >-10° and <-20°, respectively. Spinal stiffness was classified as <10° change in sacral slope between sitting and standing. Patients were categorised as: (A) able to fully sit and stand; (B) "stuck sitting" - able to fully sit; unable to fully stand; (C) "stuck standing" - able to fully stand; unable to fully sit; or (D) "stuck in the middle" - unable to sit or stand fully.

RESULTS

84 patients could sit and stand normally (A), 22 patients were stuck sitting (B), 76 patients were stuck standing (C), and 13 patients were stuck in the middle (D). While 111 patients (56.9%) were considered stuck, only 58 patients (29.7%) met criteria for spinal stiffness.

DISCUSSION

We identified a subset of patients with stiff spines and abnormal PT in both sitting and standing, including 37.1% of patients who would be classified as "stuck sitting" based only on standing radiographs. Placing acetabular components in less than anatomic anteversion in these patients may increase posterior dislocation risk.

Decreased "Polar Axis Angle" is Associated With Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A New Method to Assess Functional Component Position on Lateral-Seated Radiographs

BACKGROUND

Research on hip instability has focused on establishing "safe" ranges of combined component position in supine posture or functional placement of the acetabular component based on the hip-spine relationship. A new angle, the polar axis angle (PAA), of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) components describes the concentricity of both components and can be evaluated in functional positions that confer a greater risk of instability (ie, sitting). The goal of this study was to compare the PAA in functional positions between patients who experienced a postoperative dislocation and a matched control group who did not have a dislocation.

METHODS

An institutional database was searched for patients experiencing a dislocation after primary THA. Patients who had postoperative full-length standing and lateral-seatedradiographs were included in the dislocator group. A control group of nondislocator patients was matched 2:1 by age, body mass index, sex, and hip-spine classification. Radiographic measurements of the neck angle, acetabular ante-inclination, and PAA were performed by 2 separate blinded, trained reviewers.

RESULTS

The lateral-seated neck angle and lateral-seated PAA measurements were significantly lower in the dislocator groups (n = 37) than the control group (n = 74) (23 versus 33 degrees, P < .001; 74 versus 83 degrees, P = .012, respectively). Significant differences were also observed in changes in the polar axes and neck angles between standing and seated positions (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). When comparing patients who have mobile spines versus stiff spines within the dislocator group, there were no differences in the acetabular, neck, or PAAs. The effect of neck angle on the PAA showed a linear trend across cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who experience postoperative instability have a significantly lower PAA on lateral-seated radiographs when matched for age, sex, body mass index, and hip-spine classification. In addition, the lower seated PAA is driven more strongly by decreased functional femoral anteversion, which emphasizes the role of functional femoral version on stability in THA.

Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of risk factors and preventive options

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful elective operations in orthopedic surgery for improving pain and functional disability in patients with end-stage joint disease. However, dislocation continues to be a troublesome complication after THA, as it is a leading cause of revision and is associated with substantial social, health, and economic costs. It is a relatively rare, usually early occurrence that depends on both the patients' characteristics and the surgical aspects. The most recent and important finding is the special attention to be given preoperatively to spinopelvic mobility, which is closely related to the incidence of dislocation. Consequently, clinical and radiographic assessment of the lumbar spine is mandatory to identify an altered pelvic tilt that could suggest a different positioning of the cup. Lumbar spinal fusion is currently considered a risk factor for dislocation and revision regardless of whether it is performed prior to or after THA. Surgical options for its treatment and prevention include the use of prostheses with large diameter of femoral head size, dual mobility constructs, constrained liners, and modular neck stems.

The Role of Pelvic Compensation in Sagittal Balance and Imbalance: The Impact of Pelvic Compensation on Spinal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab system does not include a pelvic compensation (PC) subtype, potentially contributing to gaps in clinical characteristics and treatment strategy for deformity correction. It also remains uncertain as to whether PC has differing roles in sagittal balance (SB) or imbalance (SI) status. To compare radiological parameters and SRS-22r domains between patients with failed pelvic compensation (FPC) and successful pelvic compensation (SPC) based on preoperative SB and SI.

METHODS

A total of 145 adult spinal deformity patients who received deformity correction were analyzed. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were collected for statistical analysis. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on the median value of PT/PI ratio (PTr) and the cutoff value of SB. Patients with low PTr and high PTr were defined as FPC and SPC, respectively. Radiographic and clinical characteristics of different groups were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with SPC exhibited significantly greater improvements in lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, PTr, and T1 pelvic angle as compared to patients with FPC, irrespective of SB or SI. No apparent differences in any of SRS-22r domains were observed at follow-up when comparing the SB-FPC and SB-SPC patients. However, patients with SI-SPC exhibited significantly better function, self-image, satisfaction, and subtotal domains at follow-up relative to those with SI-FPC. When SI-FPC and SI-SPC patients were subdivided further based on the degree of PI-LL by adjusting for age, the postoperative function and self-image domains were significantly better in the group with overcorrection of PI-LL than undercorrection of PI-LL in SI-FPC patients. However, no differences in these SRS-22r scores were observed when comparing the subgroups in SI-SPC patients.

CONCLUSION

Flexible pelvic rotation is associated with benefits to the correction of sagittal parameters, irrespective of preoperative SB or SI status. However, PC is only significantly associated with clinical outcomes under SI. Patients with SI-FPC exhibit poorer postoperative clinical outcomes, which should be recommended to minimize PI-LL.

Spinopelvic Motion: A Simplified Approach to a Complex Subject

Knowledge of the relationship between the hip and spine is essential in the effort to minimize instability and improve outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A detailed yet straightforward preoperative imaging workup can provide valuable information on pelvic positioning, which may be helpful for optimum placement of the acetabular cup. For a streamlined preoperative assessment of THA candidates, classification systems with a capacity for providing a more personalized approach to performance of THA have been introduced. Familiarity with these systems and their clinical application is important in the effort to optimize component placement and reduce the risk of instability. Looking ahead, the principles of the hip-spine relationship are being integrated using emerging innovative technologies, promising further streamlining of the evaluation process.

The Impact of Pelvic Incidence on Spinopelvic and Hip Alignment and Mobility in Asymptomatic Subjects

BACKGROUND

The influence of pelvic incidence (PI) on spinopelvic and hip alignment and mobility has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of PI on spinopelvic and hip alignment and mobility, including the pelvic-femoral angle (PFA) and motion (ΔPFA), in functional positions in a cohort of asymptomatic volunteers.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study. We included 136 healthy volunteers (69% female; mean age, 38 ± 11 years; mean body mass index, 22 ± 3 kg/m2) divided into 3 subgroups on the basis of their PI: PI < 45° (low PI), 45° ≤ PI ≤ 60° (medium PI), and PI > 60° (high PI). We made full-body lateral radiographs in free-standing, standing with extension, relaxed-seated, and flexed-seated positions. We measured the sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PFA. We calculated lumbar (∆LL), pelvic (∆SS), and hip (∆PFA) mobilities as the change between the standing (i.e., standing with or without extension) and sitting (i.e., relaxed-seated or flexed-seated) positions.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between some of the 3 subgroups with respect to the LL, SS, and PFA in each of the 4 positions. There were no significant differences in ΔLL, ΔSS, or ΔPFA between the 3 groups when moving from a standing to a sitting position. PI had an inverse linear correlation with PFAextension (R = -0.48; p < 0.0001), PFAstanding (R = -0.53; p < 0.0001), PFArelaxed-seated (R = -0.37; p < 0.0001), and PFAflexed-seated (R = -0.47; p < 0.0001). However, PI was not correlated with ΔPFAstanding/relaxed-seated (R = -0.062; p = 0.48) or ΔPFAextension/flexed-seated (R = -0.12; p = 0.18). Similarly, PI was not significantly correlated with ΔLL or ΔSS in either pair of positions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that spinopelvic and hip parameters in functional positions were affected by PI, whereas lumbar, pelvic, and hip mobilities did not depend on PI. These findings suggest that hip surgeons should consider the PI of the patient to determine the patient's specific functional safe zones before and after total hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mobility of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex (spinopelvic mobility) and sagittal spinal alignment - implications for surgeons performing hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The optimal positioning of the hip prosthesis components is influenced by the mobility and balance of the spine. The present study classifies patients with pathology of the spino-pelvic-hip complex, showing possible methods of preventing hip dislocations after arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS

Hip-Spine Classification helps arthroplasty surgeons to implant components in more patient-specific position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The group of 100 patients treated with total hip arthroplasty. Antero-posterior (AP) X-rays of the pelvis in a standing position, lateral spine (standing and sitting) and AP of the pelvis (supine after the procedure) were analyzed. We analyzed a change in sacral tilt value when changing from standing to sitting (∆SS), Pelvic Incidence (PI), Lumbar Lordosis (LL) Mismatch, sagittal lumbar pelvic balance (standing position). Patients were classified according to the Hip-Spine Classification. Postoperatively, the inclination and anteversion of the implanted acetabular component were measured.

RESULTS

In our study 1 A was diagnosed in 61% of all cases, 1B in 18%, 2 A in 16%, 2B in 5%. 50 out of 61 (82%) in group 1 A were placed within the Levinnek "safe zone". In 1B, 2 A, 2B, the position of the acetabular component was influenced by both the spinopelvic mobility and sagittal spinal balance. The mean inclination was 43.35° and the anteversion was 17.4°.

CONCLUSIONS

Categorizing patients according to Hip-Spine Classification one can identify possible consequences the patients at risk. Pathology of the spino-pelvic-hipcomplex can lead to destabilization or dislocation of hip after surgery even though implanted according to Lewinnek's indications. Our findings suggest that Lewinnek safe zone should be abandoned in favor of the concept of functional safe zones.

Dislocation Following Anterior and Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Setting of Spinal Deformity and Stiffness: Evolving Trends Using a High-Risk Protocol at a Single Tertiary Center

BACKGROUND

Patients who have spinal stiffness and deformity are at the highest risk for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous reports of this cohort are limited to antero-lateral and postero-lateral (PL) approaches. We investigated the dislocation rate after direct anterior (DA) and PL approach THA with a contemporary high-risk protocol to optimize stability.

METHODS

We investigated patients undergoing THA who had preoperative biplanar imaging from January-December 2019. Patients were identified using radiographic criteria of spinal-stiffness (<10-degree change in sacral slope from standing to seated) and deformity (flatback deformity with >10-degree difference in pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis). There were 367 patients identified (181 DA, 186 PL). The primary outcome was dislocation rate at 2-years postoperatively. Risk-factors for dislocation were evaluated using logistic regressions (significance level of 0.05).

RESULTS

There were 6 (1.6%) dislocations in the entire cohort, with low dislocation rates for both DA (0.6%) and PL-THA (2.7%). We observed increased utilization of dual mobility with larger outer head bearings (>38 mm) with PL-THA (34.4 versus 5.0%, P < .01) and conversely increased utilization of 32-mm femoral-heads with DA-THA (39.4 versus 7.0%, P < .001). Surgical approach (PL) was not a significant risk-factor for dislocation (odds ratio: 5.03, P = .15). Patients who had a history of lumbar-fusion had 8-times higher odds for dislocation (OR: 8.20, P = .020).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series to date evaluating DA and PL-THA in the hip-spine 2B-group. Our results demonstrate lower dislocation rate than expected with either surgical approach using a high-risk protocol.

Fluoroscopy Versus Imageless Optical Navigation in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Utilization of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has risen in popularity. Accurate implant placement is a critical factor that influences patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of fluoroscopy with imageless optical navigation in DAA THA.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of 640 consecutive primary DAA THAs performed with intraoperative fluoroscopy (n = 300 patients) or imageless optical navigation (n = 304 patients). Accuracy was compared by measuring acetabular cup inclination, anteversion, and leg-length discrepancy (LLD). The proportion of implants placed within the Lewinnek safe zone and those placed within a more precise target of 40 ± 5° inclination and 20 ± 5° anteversion was evaluated.

RESULTS

According to the Lewinnek criteria, there was no difference in the percentage of implants placed within both inclination and anteversion targets (fluoroscopy: 90.3%; navigation: 88.8%, P = 0.519). Using the more precise targets, navigation increased the implants positioned correctly for both inclination and anteversion (fluoroscopy: 50.3%; navigation: 65.6%, P < 0.001). Navigation increased the proportion of implants positioned within the target anteversion zone (fluoroscopy: 71.3%; navigation: 83.8%, P < 0.001) but not inclination (fluoroscopy: 71.9%; navigation: 76.9%, P = 0.147). The mean LLD was higher with the use of fluoroscopy compared with navigation (5.5 mm, standard deviation: 4.1; 4.6 mm, SD: 3.4, P < 0.005). No difference in dislocation rate was observed ( P = 0.643).

CONCLUSION

Both fluoroscopy and imageless optical navigation demonstrated accurate acetabular implant positioning during DAA THA. Navigation was more precise and associated with improved acetabular anteversion placement and restoration of LLD. Navigation is an accurate alternative to fluoroscopy with decreased radiation exposure.

How Do Spinopelvic Characteristics Change Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Longitudinal Assessment Raising Awareness of the Postoperative Period

BACKGROUND

Spinopelvic characteristics, including sacral slope (SS), are commonly evaluated in different positions pre-total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to: 1) investigate the change in spinopelvic parameters at 7 days (early) and 1-year post-THA; and 2) identify patient characteristics associated with a change in SS of more than 7° post-THA.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 250 patients who underwent unilateral THA [132 women, age 66 years (range, 32 to 88)] and underwent biplanar images preoperatively and at 7 days and 1-year post-THA. Parameters measured included pelvic incidence, standing lumbar lordosis, SS, and proximal femoral angle (PFA). A SS change ≥ 7° was considered the threshold as it would result in more than a 5° change in cup orientation.

RESULTS

Early post-THA SSstanding remained within ± 6º from preoperative measurements in 75% of patients, reduced by ≥ 7° in 9%, and increased by ≥ 7° in 16%. Those that showed a reduction in SS had the lowest PFA and the highest SS pre-THA (P = .028, .107, and < 0.001, respectively). From 7 days until the 1-year mark, pelvic tilt increased, SS reduced (mean: -4º, range: -29 to 17º, P < .001), and patients stood with greater hip extension ΔPFAstanding (mean 7°, range: -34 to 37°, P < .001). At 1 year, SSseated had remained within ± 6º, relative to the pre-THA value, in 49% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Standing spinopelvic characteristics, especially SSstanding, remain within ±6° in three-quarters of patients both early- and at 1-year post-THA. In the remaining cases, pelvic tilt changes significantly. In 9% of cases, SS reduces ≥ 7° early THA, probably due to the alleviation of fixed-flexion contractures. The SSseated changes by ≥ ± 7° in almost 50% of cases in this study, and its clinical value as a preoperative planning tool should be questioned.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Spinal fusion and total hip arthroplasty: why timing is important

BACKGROUND

There is increasing debate among orthopaedic surgeons over the temporal relationship between lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with hip-spine syndrome. Few large studies have directly compared the results of patients who undergo LSF prior to THA (LSF-THA) to those who undergo LSF after THA (THA-LSF). The current study matched THA patients with a prior LSF to patients who underwent LSF after THA to assess: 90-day and 1-year (1) medical/surgical complications; and (2) revisions.

METHODS

We queried a national, all-payer database to identify all patients undergoing THA between 2010 and 2018 (n = 716,084). The LSF-THA patients and THA-LSF patients were then matched 1:1 on age, sex, Charleson Comorbidity Index, and obesity. Medical/surgical complications and revisions at 90 days and 1 year were recorded. Categorical and continuous variables were analysed utilising t-tests and chi-square, respectively.

RESULTS

LSF-THA patients experienced significantly more postoperative dislocations at 90 days and 1 year compared to THA-LSF patients (p = 0.048 and p < 0.001). There were a similar number of revisions performed for LSF-THA and THA-LSF patients at both 90 days and 1 year (p = 0.183 and p = 0.426). Furthermore, at 1 year, LSF-THA patients experienced more pneumonia (p = 0.005) and joint infection (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior LSF has been demonstrated to increase the risk of postoperative dislocation in patients undergoing THA. The results of the present study demonstrate increased dislocations with LSF-THA compared to THA-LSF. For "hip spine syndrome" patients requiring both LSF and THA, it may be more beneficial to undergo THA prior to LSF. Arthroplasty surgeons may wish to collaborate with spinal surgeons to ensure optimal outcomes for this group of patients.

The Empty Ischial Fossa Sign: A Visual Representation of Relative Inadequate Anteversion in the Posteriorly Tilted Pelvis

Background

Instability is a known complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is influenced by spinopelvic alignment. Radiographic markers have been investigated to optimize the acetabular cup position. This study evaluated if the empty ischial fossa (EIF) sign and the position of the trans-teardrop line were predictive of postoperative instability.

Methods

All patients who underwent THA from 2011 to 2018 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Pelvic tilt was measured using a trans-teardrop line compared to the superior aspect of the pubic symphysis on standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. Postoperative dislocations were identified through chart review and radiographic review. The EIF sign was determined by the presence of uncovered bone below the posterior inferior edge of the acetabular component at the level of the native ischium and posterior wall on standing postoperative anteroposterior radiographs.

Results

One thousand seven hundred fifty patients (952 anterior approach and 798 posterior approach) were included. The EIF sign was present in 458 patients (26.2%) and associated with an increased dislocation rate (3.9% vs 0.9%, P < .0001). Patients with spondylosis/instrumented fusion, and positive EIF sign had a dislocation risk of 5.1% vs 1.3% (P = .001). A postoperative outlet pelvis was not significant for increased dislocation risk (odds ratio 2.16, P = .058). Patients with combined spondylosis/fusion, posterior approach, outlet pelvis, and EIF sign had a dislocation rate of 14.5%.

Conclusions

The EIF sign was an independent risk factor for postoperative instability and may represent failure to account for pelvic tilt. Avoidance of the EIF sign during cup positioning may help reduce dislocations following THA.

The Hip-spine Assessment of a Novel Surgical Planning Software Provides Acetabular Component Targets That Are Reliable and in Agreement With Current Clinical Recommendations

Background

Spinopelvic immobility has been reported to increase dislocation risk following total hip arthroplasty. Surgically placing acetabular components in a functional orientation has been shown to mitigate risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of novel surgical planning software to generate clinically recommended cup targets.

Methods

Hip-spine assessments were performed retrospectively on 40 patients. Five reviewers, including 3 arthroplasty-trained surgical fellows and 2 clinical research scientists performed the assessments. Hip-spine assessments consisted of measuring anterior pelvic plane tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and lumbar lordosis on standing anteroposterior pelvis and lateral standing and seated hip-spine images. Generated cup targets and a control group (40°/20° relative to the anterior pelvic plane) were compared to clinically recommended cup targets. Agreement was defined as a cup position within the recommended range or within 3° of a specific target (eg, 40° inclination) when no range was provided. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess interrater and intrarater reliability, and McNemar's chi-square test was used to measure success relative to the control group.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.88 for delta sacral slope and 0.92 for pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. For patients with spinopelvic risk factors, the generated targets matched the clinical recommendations in 81% of patients compared to only 16% in the control group.

Conclusions

Excellent interrater and intrarater reliability was achieved using the novel surgical planning software. The resultant target values agreed with clinical recommendations to a greater extent than the control group.

Association between cup orientation and low back pain after total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head

BACKGROUND

Postoperative low back pain (LBP) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is classified as secondary hip-spine syndrome. The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations between cup orientation of THA and postoperative LBP in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study included 364 ONFH patients who underwent bilateral THA between January 2011 and December 2020. Among them, 53 patients (14.6%) experienced postoperative LBP at the end of follow-up and were designated as pain group (PG). A control group (CG) consisting of 106 patients with similar age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to those in the PG was selected. Postoperative LBP in the PG was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Demographic data, clinical information, and radiographic criteria were evaluated as potential predictors of LBP.

RESULTS

Patients in PG (mean age, 47.3 years [range, 27 to 75 years]; 42 [79%] male) had a mean VAS score of 4.6 (range, 1 to 9) compared with 0 for the patients in CG (mean age, 47.6 years [range, 19 to 77 years]; 84 [79%] male). There were no significant differences in clinical data between the two groups (p > 0.05). Preoperative radiographic variables also showed no significant differences between the PG and CG (p > 0.05). However, the postoperative inclination, anteversion, and standing ante-inclination (AI) were significantly lower in the PG compared to the CG, whereas the sitting and standing sacral slope (SS) were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Moreover, the variations in standing AI, standing and sitting pelvic tilt (PT) were significantly lower in the PG compared to the CG, while the variations in standing and sitting SS and lumbar lordosis (LL) were significantly higher (p < 0.05). The variation in standing AI in the PG showed a significantly correlation with the variation of standing SS, standing PT, and LL (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative LBP in ONFH patients after bilateral THA is significantly associated with the intraoperative cup orientation. The variation in standing AI is correlated with the variations in standing SS, standing PT, and LL, potentially contributing to the development of postoperative LBP.

Registration in the supine position improve the accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty using a portable navigation system

Portable navigation systems have been developed for use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in recent years. Although intraoperative registration in the lateral decubitus position or the supine position is need to create the three-dimensional coordinate system, it is not clear which position is appropriate. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of cup placement in primary THA in the lateral decubitus position using an image-free handheld navigation device with registration in the lateral decubitus or the supine position, and clarify which position is appropriate. This retrospective study included 129 consecutive cementless THAs performed using an image-free handheld navigation device in the lateral decubitus position. Registration in the first 68 hips was performed in the lateral decubitus position and the last 61 hips was performed in the supine position. Postoperative cup radiographic inclination and radiographic anteversion were assessed, and the accuracy was compared between the two groups. The mean absolute errors of the postoperative measured inclination and anteversion from the target angles were 3.9° ± 2.2° and 4.8° ± 3.5° in the lateral group and 2.9° ± 2.7° and 3.2° ± 2.7° in the supine group (p < 0.05). The percentage of cups inside Lewinnek's safe zone was 94% in the lateral group and 95% in the supine group (ns). The mean absolute values of navigation error in inclination and anteversion were 3.1° ± 2.1° and 4.2° ± 2.8° in the lateral group and 2.3° ± 2.0° and 3.1° ± 2.4° in the supine group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05). Registration in the supine position improved the accuracy of cup insertion compared with the lateral decubitus position in THA using an image-free handheld navigation device in the lateral decubitus position.

Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement with Concurrent Disorders of Spinopelvic Anatomy: A Narrative Review

Despite the high success rate of primary total hip replacement (THR), a significant early revision rate remains, which is largely attributed to instability and dislocations. Despite the implants being placed according to the safe zone philosophy of Lewinnek, occurrence of THR dislocation is not an uncommon complication. Large diagnostic and computational model studies have shown variability in patients' mobility based on the individual anatomic and functional relationship of the hip-pelvis-spine complex. The absolute and relative position of hip replacement components changes throughout motion of the patient's body. In the case of spinopelvic pathology such as spine stiffness, the system reaches abnormal positional states, as shown with computerized models. The clinical result of such pathologic hip positioning is edge loading, implant impingement, or even joint dislocation. To prevent such complications, surgeons must change the dogma of single correct implant positioning and take into account patients' individualized anatomy and function. It is essential to broaden the standard diagnostics and their anatomical interpretation, and correct the pre-operative surgical planning. The need for correct and personalized implant placement pushes forward the development and adaptation of novel technologies in THR, such as robotics. In this current concepts narrative review, we simplify the spinopelvic biomechanics and pathoanatomy, the relevant anatomical terminology, and the diagnosis and management algorithms most commonly used today.

Patient-Specific Safe Zones for Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mathematically Accounting for Spinopelvic Biomechanics

BACKGROUND

Despite a growing understanding of spinopelvic biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is no validated approach for executing patient-specific acetabular component positioning. The purpose of this study was to (1) validate quantitative, patient-specific acetabular "safe zone" component positioning from spinopelvic parameters and (2) characterize differences between quantitative patient-specific acetabular targets and qualitative hip-spine classification targets.

METHODS

From 2,457 consecutive primary THA patients, 22 (0.88%) underwent revision for instability. Spinopelvic parameters were measured prior to index THA. Acetabular position was measured following index and revision arthroplasty. Using a mathematical proof, we developed an open-source tool translating a surgeon-selected, preoperative standing acetabular target to a patient-specific safe zone intraoperative acetabular target. Difference between the patient-specific safe zone and the actual component position was compared before and after revision. Hip-spine classification targets were compared to patient-specific safe zone targets.

RESULTS

Of the 22 who underwent revision, none dislocated at follow-up (4.6 [range, 1 to 6.9]). Patient-specific safe zone targets differed from prerevision acetabular component position by 9.1 ± 4.2° inclination/13.3 ± 6.7° version; after revision, the mean difference was 3.2 ± 3.0° inclination/5.3 ± 2.7° version. Differences between patient-specific safe zones and the median and extremes of recommended hip-spine classification targets were 2.2 ± 1.9° inclination/5.6 ± 3.7° version and 3.0 ± 2.3° inclination/7.9 ± 3.5° version, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A mathematically derived, patient-specific approach accommodating spinopelvic biomechanics for acetabular component positioning was validated by approximating revised, now-stable hips within 5° version and 3° inclination. These patient-specific safe zones augment the hip-spine classification with prescriptive quantitative targets for nuanced preoperative planning.

An Analysis of the Preoperative Factors, Spinopelvic Mobility and Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Pre-THA Patients

Hip arthroplasty is a very effective medical procedure. The optimal positioning of the components and the functioning of the endoprosthesis are influenced, among other things, by the mobility and balance of the spine. The aim of the study was to analyze the factors influencing the mobility of the lumbar-pelvic-iliac complex (spinopelvic mobility) together with the assessment of sagittal spinal alignment in patients prior to THA (total hip arthroplasty). Patients who underwent hip replacement surgery due to advanced osteoarthritis of the hip were enrolled in the study (n = 103). The sociodemographic characteristics, BMI, radiological advancement of the degenerative disease, quality of life, and range of joint mobility were completed using a proprietary questionnaire, the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, and a clinical examination. X-ray images were analyzed: AP of the pelvis standing up, lateral of the spine standing and sitting. Key parameters were measured as ∆SS-change in sacrum angle value when changing from standing to sitting position and pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch-sagittal lumbar pelvic balance measured in standing position. The patients were assigned to the appropriate groups according to the Hip-Spine Classification: normal group: 1A (n = 65; 63.1%), abnormal groups: 1B (n = 17; 16.5%), 2A (n = 16; 15.5%), 2B (n = 5; 4.9%). A correlation was shown between the abnormal groups and the individual components of PROMs in the scope of the self-service and normal activities categories (EQ-5D and EQ-VAS). However, the strength of the relationship turned out to be moderate, and the remaining components of the survey were statistically insignificant. The remaining factors analyzed, i.e., age, BMI, the range of hip motion, the presence of contracture in the joint in a clinical examination, and the radiological advancement of osteoarthritis on the Tonnis scale, do not predict abnormal relationships between the spine and the pelvis in our patients waiting for THA. Therefore, further investigations are needed to evaluate the correlation between preoperative factors and the lumbar-pelvic-iliac complex in patients prior to planned hip arthroplasty.

Effect of hip flexion contracture on the pelvic sagittal tilt in the supine position: A retrospective case-series study

OBJECTIVES

The functional pelvic plane, which adopts the natural pelvic sagittal tilt in the supine position, is a good reference for determining the cup angle in total hip arthroplasty. However, hip flexion contracture may change pelvic tilt postoperatively by the release of contracture. This study investigated the influence of hip flexion contracture on pelvic sagittal tilt in the supine position.

METHODS

This study included 300 patients who underwent primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty. We divided the participants into two groups: with a preoperative hip extension angle of <0° (hip flexion contracture group) and without (non-contracture group). The pelvic sagittal tilt and femoral flexion angle were investigated using computed tomography or pelvic radiographs performed preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The femoral flexion angle had significantly reduced postoperatively in the hip flexion contracture group but remained unchanged in the non-contracture group. The preoperative and postoperative pelvic sagittal tilt showed no significant differences between the two groups up to 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of hip flexion contracture on the pelvic sagittal tilt in the supine position was minimal. The functional pelvic plane in the supine position could be a good reference to ascertain the cup orientation, even in hip flexion contracture cases.

Creating Consensus in the Definition of Spinopelvic Mobility

INTRODUCTION

The term "spinopelvic mobility" is most often applied to motion within the spinopelvic segment. It has also been used to describe changes in pelvic tilt between various functional positions, which is influenced by motion at the hip, knee, ankle and spinopelvic segment. In the interest of establishing a consistent language for spinopelvic mobility, we sought to clarify and simplify its definition to create consensus, improve communication, and increase consistency with research into the hip-spine relationship.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the Medline (PubMed) library to identify all existing articles pertaining to spinopelvic mobility. We reported on the varying definitions of spinopelvic mobility including how different radiographic imaging techniques are used to define mobility.

RESULTS

The search term "spinopelvic mobility" returned a total of 72 articles. The frequency and context for the varying definitions of mobility were reported. 41 papers used standing and upright relaxed-seated radiographs without the use of extreme positioning, and 17 papers discussed the use of extreme positioning to define spinopelvic mobility.

DISCUSSION

Our review suggests that the definitions of spinopelvic mobility is not consistent in the majority of published literature. We suggest descriptions of spinopelvic mobility independently consider spinal motion, hip motion, and pelvic position, while recognizing and describing their interdependence.

Bibliometric Analysis of Spinopelvic Alignment in Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative dislocation of unclear etiology remains a concern after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Interest is growing in the importance of spinopelvic alignment on stability in THA. The purpose of this study was to analyze publication trends, areas of interest, and future research direction of spinopelvic alignment in THA.

METHODS

Articles on the topic of spinopelvic alignment in THA published between 1990 and 2022 were obtained through Web of Science Core Collection of Clarivate Analytics (WSCCA). Results were screened by title, abstract, and full text. The inclusion criterion was English-language peer-reviewed journal publications on the clinical topic of spinopelvic alignment in THA. Bibliometric software was used to characterize publication trends.

RESULTS

We screened 1,211 articles, yielding 132 meeting the inclusion criterion. From 1990 to 2022, published articles have steadily increased, peaking in 2021. Countries that have been the most productive in contributions to research are those in which THA is the most prevalent. Our analysis of keyword frequency showed increasing interest in "pelvic tilt," "anteversion," and "acetabular component" position.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified that increasing attention is being given to spinopelvic mobility and PT in the setting of THA. The United States and France produced the most studies related to spinopelvic alignment.

The Current Proposed Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Planning Guidelines Based on Classification of Spine Stiffness May be Flawed Due to Incorrect Assumptions

BACKGROUND

The available classifications and preoperative planning tools for total hip arthroplasty assume that: 1) there is no variation in the sagittal pelvic tilt (SPT) if the radiographs are repeated, and 2) there is no significant change in the postoperative SPT postoperatively. We hypothesized that there would be significant differences in postoperative SPT tilt as measured by the sacral slope, thus rendering the current classifications and tools flawed.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative (1.5-6 months) full-body imaging of 237 primary total hip arthroplasty (standing and sitting positions). Patients were categorized as 1) stiff spine (standing sacral slope sitting sacral slope < 10°) and 2) normal spine (standing sacral slope-sitting sacral slope ≥ 10°). Results were compared using the paired t-test. The posthoc power analysis showed a power of 0.99.

RESULTS

The difference in mean standing and sitting sacral slope between the preoperative and postoperative measurements was 1°. However, in standing position, this difference was more than 10° in 14.4% of patients. In the sitting position, this difference was more than 10° in 34.2% of patients and more than 20° in 9.8% of patients. Postoperatively, 32.5% of patients switched groups based on the classification, which rendered the preoperative planning suggested by the current classifications flawed.

CONCLUSION

Current preoperative planning and classifications are based on a single acquisition of preoperative radiographs without the incorporation of possible postoperative changes in SPT. Validated classifications and planning tools should incorporate repeated measurements to determine the mean and variance in SPT and consider the significant postoperative changes in SPT.

"Incidence of Instability Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Continues to Decline in the Medicare Population"

BACKGROUND

Instability has been the primary cause of failure following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) leading to revision hip surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if instability rates have further declined following advances in primary THA including dual mobility articulations, direct anterior approaches, advanced technologies, and improved knowledge of the hip-spine relationships.

METHODS

Using the 5% Medicare Part B claims data from 1999 to 2019, we identified 81,573 patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis. Patients who experienced instability at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were identified. Multivariate cox regression analyses evaluated the effect of patient and procedure characteristics on the risk for instability.

RESULTS

Instability at 1 year following primary THA declined from approximately 4% in 2000 to 2.3% in 2010 and 1.6% in 2018. The leading cause of revision surgery was infection (18.6%), followed by peri-prosthetic fracture (14%), mechanical loosening (11.5%), and instability (9.4%). High risk groups for instability continue to include increased age, higher Charlson index, obesity, lumbar spine pathology, and neurocognitive disorders.

CONCLUSION

Instability is no longer the leading etiology of failure following primary THA with a decline of approximately 40% over the past decade. Infection, periprosthetic fracture, mechanical loosening, and then instability are now the leading causes of failure. Multiple factors may play a role in the decline of instability including increased use of dual mobility articulations, direct anterior approaches, improved knowledge of the hip-spine relationships, and use of advanced technologies.

Sacral Slope Change From Standing to Relaxed-Seated Grossly Overpredicts the Presence of a Stiff Spine

BACKGROUND

Several authors propose that a change in sacral slope of ≤10° between the standing and relaxed-seated positions (ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated}) identifies a patient with a stiff lumbar spine and has suggested the use of dual-mobility bearings for such patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to assess how accurately ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} can identify patients with a stiff spine.

METHODS

A prospective, multicentre, consecutive cohort series of 312 patients had standing, relaxed-seated, and flexed-seated lateral radiographs prior to THA. ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} was determined by the change in sacral slope between the standing and relaxed-seated positions. Lumbar flexion (LF) was defined as the difference in lumbar lordotic angle between standing and flexed-seated. LF ≤20° was considered a stiff spine. The predictive value of ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} for characterizing a stiff spine was assessed.

RESULTS

A weak correlation between ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} and LF was identified (r² = 0.13). Eighty six patients (28%) had ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10° and 19 patients (6%) had a stiff spine. Of the 86 patients with ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10°, 13 had a stiff spine. The positive predictive value of ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10° for identifying a stiff spine was 15%.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10° was not correlated with a stiff spine. Using this simplified approach could lead to a 7-fold overprediction of patients with a stiff lumbar spine and abnormal spinopelvic mobility, unnecessary use of dual-mobility bearings, and incorrect component alignment targets. Referring to patients with ΔSS_{standing→relaxed-seated} ≤10° as being stiff is misleading. The flexed-seated position should be used to effectively assess a patient's spine mobility prior to THA.

High Prevalence of Spinopelvic Risk Factors in Patients With Post-Operative Hip Dislocations

BACKGROUND

Excessive standing posterior pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar spine stiffness, low pelvic incidence (PI), and severe sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) have been linked to increased dislocation rates. We aimed to determine the prevalence of these 4 parameters in a cohort of unstable total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients and compare these to a large representative control population of primary THA patients.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with instability following primary THA were compared to a control cohort of 9414 THA patients. Lateral X-rays in standing and flexed-seated positions were used to assess PT and lumbar lordosis (LL). Computed tomography scans were used to measure PI and acetabular cup orientation. Thresholds for "at risk" spinopelvic parameters were standing posterior PT ≤ -15°, lumbar flexion (LL_stand-LL_seated) ≤ 20°, PI ≤ 41°, PI ≥ 70°, and SSD (PI-LL_stand mismatch ≥ 20°).

RESULTS

There were significant differences in mean spinopelvic parameters between the dislocating and control cohorts (P < .001). There were no differences in mean PI (58° versus 56°, respectively, P = .29) or prevalence of high and low PI between groups. 67% of the dislocating patients had one or more significant risk factors, compared to only 11% of the control. A total of 71% of the dislocating patients had cup orientations within the traditional safe zone.

CONCLUSION

Excessive standing posterior PT, low lumbar flexion, and a severe SSD are more prevalent in unstable THAs. Pre-op screening for these parameters combined with appropriate planning and implant selection may help identify at risk patients and reduce the prevalence of dislocation.

What Changes in Pelvic Sagittal Tilt Occur 20 Years After THA?

BACKGROUND

Cup orientation in THA in the supine, standing, and sitting positions is affected by pelvic sagittal tilt (PT). Patterns of PT shift between these positions may increase the risk of dislocation and edge loading. The PT has also been reported to change during the aging process; however, there is limited research regarding long-term changes in PT and PT shifts after THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What changes occur in PT in the supine, standing, and sitting positions during 20 years of follow-up after THA in patients who have not had revision or dislocation? (2) What factors are associated with the differences between preoperative supine PT and postoperative sitting or standing PT (Δ sitting and Δ standing, respectively) 20 years postoperatively?

METHODS

Between January 1998 and December 1999, 101 consecutive patients underwent THA for appropriate indications. AP radiographs of the pelvis in the supine, standing, and sitting positions preoperatively and at 1, 10, and 20 years after THA were longitudinally performed to evaluate changes in PT. Fifty-nine percent (60 of 101) of patients were lost before 20 years of follow-up or had incomplete sets of imaging tests, leaving 41% (41 of 101) eligible for analysis here. There were no patients who had recurrent dislocation or underwent revision arthroplasty in the cohort; therefore, this analysis regarding postoperative changes in PT indicates the natural course of the change in PT during follow-up of THA. PT was measured based on the anterior pelvic plane. PT shifts with positional changes, Δ standing, and Δ sitting during the follow-up period were calculated. Posterior changes and shifts are represented by negative values. To analyze the factors associated with Δ standing and Δ sitting after 20 years, the correlations between these parameters and preoperative factors (including sex, age, pelvic incidence [PI], lumbar lordosis [LL], preoperative PT, and preoperative PT shift) and postoperative factors (including the occurrence of new lumbar vertebral fractures, lumbar spondylolisthesis, contralateral THA performed during follow-up, and PI-LL 20 years after THA) were determined.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) supine and standing PTs changed (moved posteriorly) by -5° (-11° to -2°; p < 0.01) and -10° (-15° to -7°; p < 0.01), respectively. Sitting PT did not change during the 20-year follow-up period. Median (IQR) PT shift from standing to sitting changed from -34° preoperatively (-40° to -28°) to -23° after 20 years (-28° to -20°). There were posterior changes in median (range) Δ standing (median -12° at 20 years [-19° to -7°]); Δ sitting did not change during the follow-up period (median -36° at 20 years [-40° to -29°]). Patients with a large preoperative posterior PT shift from supine to standing demonstrated larger posterior tilt of Δ standing at 20 years. Patients with lumbar vertebral fractures during follow-up demonstrated larger posterior tilt of Δ standing at 20 years.

CONCLUSION

Patients who demonstrate a large preoperative posterior shift from supine to standing deserve special consideration when undergoing THA. In such circumstances, we recommend that the anteversion of the cup not be excessive, given that there is a relatively high risk of further posterior tilt in PT, which may lead to anterior dislocation and edge loading. Further longitudinal study in a larger cohort of patients with complications including postoperative dislocation and revision, as well as older patients, is needed to verify these assumptions on the potential risk for dislocation and edge loading after THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

The Correlation Between Pelvic Motion and Lumbar Motion in Patients Presenting With a Lumbar Spinal Pathology: Implications for Assessing Dislocation Risk in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Arthroplasty surgeons use the change in sacral slope (ΔSS) from sitting to standing as a measure of spinal motion. The relationship between ΔSS and the change in lumbar lordosis (ΔLL), an established spinal motion measure, has not been well studied. This study aims to determine the correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL.

Methods

Consecutive patients presenting to a spine clinic from 2020 to 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively studied. Standing and sitting lateral radiographs were measured for SS and LL. Patients were divided using ΔSS and ΔLL into stiff (0°-9°), normal (10°-30°), or hypermobile (>30°) category. Patients with a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but a ΔLL-determined stiff spine were compared to the rest of the cohort.

Results

Overall, 100 patients were included. Of these patients, 47% had the same classification when looking at ΔSS and ΔLL, whereas 53% had conflicting classifications. Twenty percent of patients had a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but ΔLL-determined stiff spine. The correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL was 0.510 (P < .001). When isolating patients who underwent lumbar fusion, the correlation between ΔSS and ΔLL was 0.345 (P < .001).

Conclusions

ΔSS has a moderate correlation with ΔLL in patients presenting for evaluation of their lumbar spine but low correlation in patients with lumbar fusion. In our cohort, 20% of patients had a ΔSS-determined normal or hypermobile spine but a ΔLL-determined stiff spine, representing a potential high-risk dislocation cohort not captured by ΔSS alone. Arthroplasty surgeons should revisit classifying spinal motion based solely on ΔSS.

Increased Dislocation Rates After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Isolated Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

While stiffness of the lumbosacral spine is a known predictor of instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA), little is known about the medical- and surgical-related outcomes following THA in patients who have prior isolated sacroiliac (SI) joint arthrodesis.

METHODS

197 patients who had a history of isolated SI joint arthrodesis who subsequently underwent elective primary THA for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (THA-SI) from 2015 to 2021 were identified in a national administrative database. Using propensity score matching and logistic regression analyses, this cohort was compared to two groups of patients: patients who did not have any history of lumbar or SI arthrodesis and patients undergoing primary THA who had a history of lumbar arthrodesis without extension into the SI joint (THA-LF).

RESULTS

The THA-SI group had a significantly higher incidence of dislocation (odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.04-4.04, P = .037) with no increased incidence of medical complications or other surgical complications when compared to patients without a history of SI or lumbar arthrodesis. There were no significant differences in any complications in THA-SI patients when compared to THA-LF patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients who had prior isolated SI joint arthrodesis undergoing primary THA demonstrated a two-fold increased incidence of dislocation when compared to those who did not have prior SI arthrodesis, although the risk of complications in this population was similar to that observed in patients who had prior isolated lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Prosthetic Hip Dislocations in Direct Anterior versus Posterior Approach in Patients with Instrumented Lumbar Fusion

BACKGROUND

Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion (IPLSF) has been demonstrated to contribute to instability following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). It is unclear whether a supine Direct Anterior (DA) approach reduces the risk of instability.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1,773 patients who underwent THA through either a DA approach or a posterior approach at our institution over a 7-year period. Radiographic and chart review were then used to identify our primary group of interest comprised of 111 patients with previous IPLSF. Radiographic review, chart review, and phone survey was performed. Dislocation rates in each approach group were then compared within this cohort of patients with IPLSF.

RESULTS

Within the group of patients with IPLSF, 33.3% (n=37) received a DA approach while 66.6% (n=74) received a posterior approach. None of the 9 total dislocations in the DA group had IPLSF, whereas 4 of the 16 total dislocations in the posterior approach group had IPLSF (p=0.78). When examining the larger group of patients, including those without IPLSF, patients undergoing a DA approach had a lower BMI and were likely have a smaller head size implanted (p<0.001 for both). Using Fischer's exact test, fusion was associated with dislocation in the posterior approach group (p<0.01), whereas fusion was not associated with dislocation in the anterior approach group (p=1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

While there was no significant difference in dislocation rates between posterior and anterior approach groups, in patients with IPLSF, the anterior approach had a lower percentage of dislocation events compared to the posterior approach.

Variability of pre-operative functional pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty patients

PURPOSE

Pelvic tilt (PT) is important to consider when planning total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to its dynamic impact on acetabular orientation. The degree of sagittal pelvic rotation varies during functional activities and can be difficult to measure without proper imaging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PT variation in the supine, standing, and seated positions.

METHODS

A multi-centre cross-sectional study was performed that included 358 THA patients who had preo-perative PT measured from supine CT scan and standing and upright seated lateral radiographs. Supine, standing, and seated PT and associated changes between functional positions were evaluated. Anterior PT was assigned a positive value.

RESULTS

In the supine position, mean PT was 4° (range, -35° to 20°), where 23% had posterior PT and 69% anterior PT. In the standing position, mean PT was 1° (range, -23° to 29°), where 40% had posterior PT and 54% anterior PT. In the seated position, mean PT was -18° (range, -43° to 47°), where 95% had posterior PT and 4% anterior PT. From standing to seated, the pelvis rotated posteriorly in 97% of cases (maximum 60°) with 16% of cases considered stiff (change ≤ 10°) and 18% of cases considered hypermobile (change ≥ 30°).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing THA have marked PT variation in the supine, standing, and seated positions. There was wide variability in PT change from standing to seated, with 16% of patients considered stiff and 18% considered hypermobile. Functional imaging should be performed on patients prior to THA to allow for more accurate planning.

Dislocation Rates of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Lumbar Spine Fusion and Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease With and Without Utilization of Dual Mobility Cups: An American Joint Replacement Registry Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a previous history of lumbar spine fusion (LSF) are at increased risk of dislocation. The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day and 1-year dislocation rates of patients with LSF or lumbar degenerative disk disease who underwent primary THA with and without dual mobility (DM) constructs.

METHODS

An American Joint Replacement Registry data set of patients aged 65 years and older undergoing primary THA with minimum 1-year follow-up with a history of prior LSF or a diagnosis of lumbar degenerative disk disease was created. DM status was identified, and dislocation and all-cause revision at 90 days and 1 year were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 15,572 patients met study criteria. The overall dislocation rates for the non-DM and DM groups were 1.17% and 0.68%, respectively, at 90 days, and 1.68% and 0.91%, respectively, at 1 year ( P = 0.005). The odds of 90-day (OR = 0.578, [ P = 0.0328]) and 1-year (OR = 0.534, [ P = 0.0044]) dislocation were significantly less with DM constructs, compared with non-DM constructs. No statistically significant difference was observed in revision rates between groups.

DISCUSSION

This large registry-based study identified a reduced risk of dislocation in patients at risk for spinal stiffness when a DM compared with non-DM construct was used in primary THA at 90-day and 1-year follow-up intervals. Our data support the use of DM constructs in high-risk patients with stiff spines and altered spinopelvic mobility as a promising option to mitigate the risk of postoperative hip instability after primary THA.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III. Therapeutic retrospective cohort.

Failure of a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner After Spine Fusion

A 73-year-old woman, 11 years after total hip arthroplasty and 2 years after a multilevel lumbar spine fusion, presented with a 2-month history of anterior hip and gluteal pain. She was diagnosed with an acetabular liner fracture that occurred through the high wall, likely related to repetitive impingement on the neck of the femoral implant, as notable burnishing was observed on the explanted femoral head. The acetabulum was successfully revised to a dual-mobility articulation. Spinal fusion after total hip arthroplasty can alter the acetabular implant position and was seen in our patient whose previously functional high-walled liner failed. Surgeons may consider alternative techniques, including a change in acetabular implant's anteversion to mitigate the need for a high-walled liner or the use of a dual-mobility bearing.

Consideration of pelvic tilt at the time of preoperative planning improves standing acetabular position after robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Approximately half of dislocating total hip arthroplasties (THAs) demonstrate acetabular component position within traditional safe zones. It is unclear if postoperative functional acetabular position can be reliably improved by considering preoperative pelvic tilt. We investigated whether standing cup position targets could be more accurately achieved by considering preoperative standing pelvic tilt in addition to bone landmarks when planning for robot-assisted THA.

METHODS

We reviewed 146 THAs performed by a single surgeon using computed tomography-based 3-dimensional planning and robotic technology to guide acetabular reaming and component insertion. Planning for 73 consecutive cases started at 40° of inclination and 22° of anteversion relative to the supine functional plane and was adjusted to better match native hip anatomy. Planning for the next 73 cases was modified to consider standing pelvic position based on standing preoperative radiographs. We compared groups to determine the rate when cups were placed outside our standing targets of 15-30° anteversion and 35-50° inclination.

RESULTS

Cup position proved to be reliable in both groups, with 83% of cups in the anatomic planning cohort and 90% of cups in the functional planning cohort achieving standing targets for both anteversion and inclination (p = 0.227). Variances were lower in the functional planning group: 9.4° versus 15.8° of inclination (p = 0.079) and 18.3° versus 26.1° of anteversion (p = 0.352). The range of functional positions was narrower in the functional planning group: 35.7-47.5° versus 31.8-54.9° of inclination and 16.7-35.0° versus 10.1-35.9° of anteversion.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest enhanced planning that considers pelvic tilt, when coupled to a precision tool to achieve the plan, can reliably achieve target standing component positions. Considering preoperative functional pelvic position may improve postoperative functional acetabular component placement in THA, but the clinical benefit of this has yet to be confirmed.

Does fusion length matter? Total hip arthroplasty dislocation after extension of lumbosacral fusion: a case report

CASE

Hip-spine syndrome is a complex challenge for orthopedic surgeons. We present a 60-year-old female with a history of spinal fusion and total hip arthroplasty. The patient underwent extension of the previous fusion with sacropelvic fixation, and 5 months later she presented with left posterior prosthetic hip dislocation which required sedation and closed reduction.

CONCLUSION

Even with no change in lumbar lordosis or pelvic tilt and adequate acetabular cup position, extension of the fusion construct may predispose patients to dislocation. This may be the result of an increased lever arm acting at the hip joint, thereby leading to instability.

The Impact of Hip Mobility on Lumbar and Pelvic Mobility before and after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Hip arthrosis and total hip arthroplasty (THA) can alter a patient's balance and spinopelvic mobility. In this study, we hypothesized that lumbar, pelvic, and hip mobility and their inter-relations are affected by THA and that their study could give an insight in our understanding of postoperative balance and mobility. A total of 165 patients with hip arthrosis and with an indication for THA were included in this single-center prospective cohort. Sagittal radiographs were acquired in four positions: free-standing, standing extension, relaxed-seating and flexed-seating preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. Spinopelvic parameters were measured (pelvic tilt and incidence, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, pelvic-femoral angle). Standing spinopelvic parameters did not significantly change postoperatively. However, the postural changes occurring between positions were significantly altered after THA. In particular, pelvic and lumbar mobility was significantly reduced postoperatively, while hip mobility was increased. Correlations were observed between the changes in lumbar, pelvic and hip mobility before and after THA. This study confirmed that there is a relationship between lumbar, pelvic and hip mobility in osteoarthritis, and that this relationship is modified by the postoperative compensation mechanisms deployed by the patient in dynamic postures. Hence, surgeons should consider these relationships when planning surgery, in order to obtain a physiological pelvic tilt postoperatively and to account for the potential increased risk of impingement and dislocation with hip hypermobility.

The Functional Mechanics of the Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty functional safe zones match postural hip changes to dynamic positioning of the acetabular component. We studied integrating the Anteinclination (AI) cup angle into the spinopelvic environment, defining normative values for all parameters and calculating adjustments to AI for each degree of altered standing pelvic position and postural mobility from these values. A sagittal geometric model was employed to determine these values using established spinopelvic parameter angles.

METHODS

Theoretical normative Pelvic Incidence (PI) specific values were calculated using a triangular construct employing a linear equation describing the functional relationship between the pelvic parameters at a mobility producing an isosceles solution for normative acetabular angles. Individual optimal AI cup values for altered Sacral Slope (SS)/pelvic tilt (sPT) and mobility (dSS) were calculated using specific ratios of angular change between parameters correcting from these normative values.

RESULTS

A PI:SS:sPT ratio of angular change of 3:2:1 at dSS = 25° mobility creates an isosceles condition solving for PI specific theoretical normative values for all construct parameters. Individualized tilt correction applies to each posture a +0.25° AI alteration for each +1° sPT increase from this architectural value. Mobility correction applies a +0.5° standing AI and -0.5° sitting AI alteration for each -1° dSS < 25°, the opposite for each +1° dSS > 25°. The Sacroacetabular angle/Pelvic acetabular angle (SAA/PAA) index describes the underlying spinopelvic environment the cup functions within.

CONCLUSION

This model quantitatively integrates an implanted acetabular component into the host spinopelvic environment. Theoretical normative and individual optimal cup orientations are passively determined by these conditions of standing pelvic position and mobility.

Spinal pathology and outcome post-THA: does segment of arthrodesis matter?

INTRODUCTION

The presence of lumbar spine arthrodesis (SA) is associated with abnormal spinopelvic characteristics and inferior outcome post total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, whether patients with upper segment SA are also at increased risk of complications is unknown. This study aims to (1) determine if upper segment SA is associated with inferior THA outcomes; (2) assess spino-pelvic characteristics; and (3) test whether static or dynamic spinopelvic characteristics correlate with outcome post-THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, case-matched, cohort study from a tertiary referral centre, 40 patients (59 hips) that had undergone both THA and any level of spinal arthrodesis (49 THA-Lumb and 10 THA-Cerv) were compared with 41 patients (59 hips) who had THA-only without known spinal pathology. Spino-pelvic characteristics [including severity of Degenerative-Disc-Disease (DDD); spinal balance and stiffness] and outcome, including patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), at minimum of 1-year post-THA were assessed.

RESULTS

THA-Lumb and THA-Cerv groups had greater number of complications and inferior hip and spinal PROMs compared to THA-Only (p < 0.001). Similar spinopelvic characteristics were seen between the THA-Cerv and THA-Lumb, which were significantly different to the THA-only group. The presence of DDD and unbalanced or stiff spine was associated with increased dislocation and inferior PROMs in the whole cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

THA in the presence of SA, regardless of level, is associated with inferior outcomes and an increased risk for dislocation. The presence of a SA is associated with increased risk of adverse spinopelvic characteristics. Such characteristics were strongly associated with increased dislocation-risk and inferior PROMs. It is likely that these adverse characteristics are the most important adverse predictor, rather than segment of SA per se.

Spinopelvic Hypermobility Corrects After Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Spinopelvic hypermobility may be secondary to a stiff osteoarthritic hip with a compliant spine. Purpose: We sought to determine if spinopelvic hypermobility resolves after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and when it resolves in patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing staged bilateral THA. We also sought to analyze the change in spinopelvic parameters before and after the second THA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 2047 THAs that were performed by 2 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons from 2014 to 2018. Patients with preoperative spinopelvic hypermobility undergoing staged bilateral THA were identified. Radiographic spinopelvic parameters, including sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL mismatch, anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPt), and spinopelvic tilt (SPT), were measured on preoperative, 6-week postoperative, and 1-year postoperative lateral standing and sitting radiographs. Bilateral hip OA was graded using Kellgren-Lawrence criteria. Results: We identified 42 patients with preoperative spinopelvic hypermobility who underwent staged bilateral THA. Mean time (standard deviation) between surgeries was 9.4 months (±10.0). After the first THA, spinopelvic hypermobility resolved in 29% of the patients. After the second THA, it resolved in 67% at 6 weeks, increasing to 98% at 1 year postoperatively. Conclusion: Spinopelvic hypermobility resolves after staged bilateral THA in 98% of the patients, occurring most often only after the second THA. Less than one-third of the patients had resolution after the first THA, suggesting that contralateral hip OA continues to drive hip-driven spinopelvic motion. Acetabular component position targets based on functional pelvic position should incorporate these changes in spinopelvic motion with the understanding that resolution of hypermobility usually occurs after the second THA.

Does Total Hip Arthroplasty Affect Spinopelvic and Spinal Alignment?: A Prospective Observational Investigation

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study, level of evidence 3.

OBJECTIVES

The study with patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) aimed to evaluate the following hypotheses: (1) the spinal sagittal and coronal alignment alters due to THA, (2) the spinopelvic parameter changes after THA, (3) the spinopelvic alignment differs between sagittal balanced and imbalanced patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical correction of spinal sagittal misalignment affects the spinopelvic alignment and pelvic tilt. It is not yet known to what extent THA affects spinopelvic, spinal sagittal, and coronal alignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 153 patients undergoing THA were assessed with biplanar stereoradiography in standing position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators examined C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, lumbar lordosis (LL), C7-central sacral vertical line, pelvic oblique angle lumbosacral, intra-pelvic oblique angle, pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). An analysis of the sagittal misaligned subgroups of C7-SVA and PI-LL on the influence of the spinopelvic alignment was performed.

RESULTS

A significant difference in spinopelvic parameters was detected in the preoperative to postoperative comparison (SS, PT, APPT, and PFA; P <0.000) ( d =-0.394; d =0.609; d =-0.481; d =0.431). The coronal alignment and pelvic obliquity revealed no significant differences. The misaligned groups (C7-SVA; PI-LL) demonstrated significant increases in PI and PT and decreased in LL compared with the groups with normal sagittal alignment. Preoperatively, 66/153 (C7-SVA) and 46/153 (PI-LL) of the THA patients presented sagittal misalignment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest an effect of THA on sagittal spinal and spinopelvic alignment, with a significant reduction of PT postoperatively and no effect on coronal alignment. Particularly striking are the significant differences in the misaligned groups, which may be classified as risk population and potentially can contribute biomechanically to a higher risk of posterior impingement and anterior THA dislocation. The substantial proportion of sagittal misaligned patients in the THA collective illustrates the crucial need for interdisciplinary collaboration.

Does spinopelvic motion change after total hip arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

Spinopelvic motion plays an important role in functional acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Sacral slope (SS) has been a useful surrogate for spinopelvic motion. The present study aimed to investigate statistical characteristics of spinopelvic motion before and after THA using changes in SS in supine, standing, and sitting positions.

METHODS

A total of 76 patients (88 hips) were assessed. To classify spinopelvic mobility, defined as a change in SS from standing to sitting position (ΔSS_stand/sit), 10° ≤ ΔSS_stand/sit ≤ 30°, ΔSS_stand/sit < 10°, and ΔSS_stand/sit > 30° were considered normal, stiff, and hypermobile, respectively.

RESULTS

Over ± 7° changes in SS between before and one year after THA were observed in 39 (44.3%) hips in the sitting position, 19 (21.6%) hips in the supine position, seven (7.9%) in the standing position. Percentages of hips with stiff spinopelvic mobility (11.4% vs. 22.7%) and hypermobile spinopelvic mobility (23.9% vs. 12.5%) between before THA and one year after THA were significantly different (p = 0.034 and p = 0.016, McNemar's test). At one year after THA, 40.0% (4/10) of hips with stiff spinopelvic mobility and 57.1% (12/21) of hips with hypermobile spinopelvic mobility shifted to normal spinopelvic mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

Change in SS between before THA and one year after THA had a high inter-subject variability especially in the sitting position. In addition, there was a distinct shift to normal spinopelvic mobility postoperatively in hips with stiff and hypermobile spinopelvic mobility pre-operatively.

Spinopelvic Mobility Pattern and Acetabular Anteversion in Stiff Hips With Ankylosing Spondylitis After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Fused hips with spine stiffness in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) reduce spinopelvic mobility. We aimed to assess spinopelvic mobility pattern and acetabular anteversion in AS after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-four stiff hips in 58 AS individuals (mean age: 37.05) who underwent THA between 2012 and 2018 with a modified lateral approach were included. Twenty-three hips were fused, and 71 hips had mean flexion of 37.67°. Pelvic tilt, pelvic inclination, sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis were correlated with THA, and functional outcomes were assessed at 34.6-month mean follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven had a stuck sitting pattern with stuck standing seen in 4 individuals. SS standing before and after THA were 25.08° and 27.30°. SS sitting was 8.99° compared to 16.80°. SS from sitting to standing was reduced (17.7°) in 17 individuals. Spine stiffness in extension was seen in 4 out of 37. Mean acetabular inclination after THA was 42.67°, and acetabular anteversion was 17.48°. Flexion after THA improved to mean 98.47°. Changes in SS from sitting to standing were correlated with THA (r-value: 0.93, P-value: .0001). The Harris Hip Score improved from 25.31 to 82.39 (P-value <.05), and the mean 12-item Short Form Survey at review was 52.18 and 59.55 (physical and mental components). The mean Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities Arthritis Index score was 17.56.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinopelvic mobility change was <10° after THA in AS, stuck sitting was seen in 37 of 58 (63.8%), and stuck standing was seen in 4 of 58 (6.9%), including spine stiffness in flexion or extension. Acetabular anteversion assessed was 17.48° (standard deviation: 4.41), with significant functional improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Effect of Coronal and Sagittal Spinal Malalignment on Spinopelvic Mobility in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective Observational Study

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

This investigation aimed (1) to determine the impact of sagittal spinal alignment with C7-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and Roussouly classification on individual segments of spinopelvic mobility represented by lumbar flexibility [∆lumbar lordosis (LL)], pelvic mobility [∆pelvic tilt (PT)], and hip motion [∆pelvic femoral angle (PFA)] and (2) to assess the influence of coronal spinal balance on the spinopelvic complex in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) preoperatively and postoperatively.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Restricted spinopelvic mobility gained attention as a contributing factor for THA instability. However, it remains unclear what influence the coronal and sagittal spinal alignment has on spinopelvic mobility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 197 THA patients were included in the investigation conducting biplanar stereoradiography in standing and sitting position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators assessed C7-SVA (≤50 mm balanced, >50 mm imbalanced), PI-LL (≤10 degrees balanced, >10 degrees imbalanced), refounded Roussouly classification, coronal spinal balance with C7-central sacral vertical line, LL, pelvic incidence (PI), PT, PFA. Individual segments of spinopelvic mobility based on the change from standing to sitting were defined as ∆LL, ∆PT, and ∆PFA. Unpaired t test or Welch t test for comparison between groups of 2 was applied. Analysis of variance and post hoc analysis according to Bonferroni or Games-Howell was used to determine differences between groups of >2. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the interrater reliability of the radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

Significant differences were demonstrated for ∆LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 24.7 degrees/19.1 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 24.4 degrees/16.4 degrees, P <0.000), PT (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 12.5 degrees/15.2 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 10.8 degrees/20.5 degrees, P <0.000), PI (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 52.9 degrees/56.9 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 52.1 degrees/61.0 degrees, P <0.000), LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 54.8 degrees/47.8 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 55.3 degrees/42.6 degrees, P <0.000). The coronal spinal balance (central sacral vertical line) indicated no significant differences regarding spinopelvic mobility between positive, neutral, or negative balanced groups. Significant differences with decreased pelvic mobility (∆PT) and lumbar flexibility (∆LL) in low-grade PI types 1 and 2 compared with high-grade PI type 4 according to the Roussouly classification were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate spinal sagittal alignment using 3 different classifications in association to the spinopelvic complex in THA patients preoperatively and postoperatively. The significantly altered spinopelvic mechanics with decreased lumbar flexibility and increased pelvic retroversion in sagittal imbalanced patients clearly indicate the need for a separate consideration of the global spinal sagittal alignment. Our findings emphasize the importance of risk stratification for THA candidates in terms of sagittal imbalance attempting to mitigate the THA instability risk with accurate preoperative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Intraoperative Technology Use Improves Accuracy of Functional Safe Zone Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Targets of acetabular inclination and anteversion have been suggested based on a patient's spinopelvic mobility. Current methods in total hip arthroplasty (THA) include manual instrumentation, computer-assisted navigation, and robotic-assisted surgery. This study aims to compare the accuracy of these 3 methods in targeting the functional safe zone.

METHODS

This is a prospective multicenter study including a series of 251 consecutive primary posterior THA patients from April 2019 to January 2021. Preoperative lateral standing and sitting spinopelvic radiographs were obtained. Each patient was classified using the Hip-Spine Classification. A functional safe zone plan was determined. Surgeons used their preferred method (manual instrumentation, computer-assisted, or robotic-assisted). Postoperative anteversion and inclination was measured and compared to the preoperative plan. Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative values were calculated. Welch's t-test was used to assess significant between-group differences with P < .05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Of the 249 patients, there were 63 manual instrumentation, 68 computer-assisted navigation, and 118 robotic-assisted surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery (rTHA) was significantly more accurate in targeting anteversion (1 ± 2) compared to manual instrumentation (mTHA; 7 ± 6, P < .001) and computer-assisted navigation (cTHA; 6 ± 6, P < .001). rTHA was also significantly more accurate in targeting inclination (1 ± 1) compared to mTHA (8 ± 7, P < .001) and cTHA (6 ± 7, P < .001). Although cTHA had greater accuracy in targeting both inclination and anteversion compared to mTHA, these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted surgery was more accurate than both computer-assisted navigation and manual instrumentation in targeting the functional safe zone in primary THA. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of improved accuracy on dislocation rates.

Model-Based Acetabular Cup Orientation Optimization Based On Minimizing the Risk of Edge-Loading and Implant Impingement Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

In this paper, a computationally-efficient model-based method for determining patient-specific optimal acetabular cup alignment for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is presented. The proposed algorithm minimizes the risk of implant impingement and edge-loading, which are reported as the major causes of hip dislocation following THA. First, by using motion capture data recorded from the patient performing different daily activities, the hip contact force and the relative orientation of the femur and pelvis are calculated by a musculoskeletal model. Then, by defining two quantitative indices i.e., angular impingement distance and angular edge-loading distance, the risk of impingement and edge-loading are assessed for a wide range of cup alignments. And finally, three optimization criteria are introduced to estimate the optimal cup alignment with a tradeoff between the risk of impingement and edge-loading. The results show that patient-specific characteristics such as pelvic tilt could significantly change the optimal cup alignment, especially the value of cup anteversion. Therefore, in some cases, the well-known Lewinnek safe zone may not be optimal, or even safe. Unlike other dynamic model-based methods, in this work, the need for force plate measurements is eliminated by estimating the ground reaction forces and moments, which makes this method more practical and cost-efficient. Furthermore, the low computational complexity due to analytical formulas makes this method suitable for both preoperative and intra-operative planning.