Team Approach: Elbow Contracture Due to Heterotopic Ossification

Comparative study of open elbow arthrolysis with and without hinge external fixation for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to compare the functional outcomes of hinged external fixators and non-external fixation in open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) for post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) and to evaluate their applicability and limitations in patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with PTES treated with OEA at our hospital between March 2015 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The assessed variables were the operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, duration of hospitalization, and treatment costs. The elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (Q-DASH) score, Oxford Elbow score (OES), Broberg and Morrey score (BMS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and complications such as pin tract infection and heterotopic ossification were compared between patients with and without hinge external fixation. We also compared the baseline characteristics and functional outcomes of patients with and without hinge external fixation.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (48 patients with hinged external fixators and 108 patients without external fixators) diagnosed with PTES were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 15.8 ± 3.6 months. Compared with patients without external fixators, those with external fixators showed significantly greater improvements in elbow flexion and extension ROM (59.6° ± 26.1° vs. 46.2° ± 26.2°, p = 0.004) but had a significantly longer duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001), significantly longer operation time (p < 0.001), significantly higher treatment costs (p < 0.001), and significantly greater intraoperative blood loss volume (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of improvement in elbow rotation ROM, MEPS score, VAS score for pain, OES score, Q-DASH score, BMS score, or incidence of complications.

CONCLUSION

The use of a hinged external fixator in open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness may result in short-term improvements in flexion-extension range of motion but is accompanied by increased blood loss, longer operative time, extended hospitalization, and higher costs. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Optimizing continuous passive motion duration following arthroscopic release of elbow contracture: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The anatomical structure of the elbow joint makes it vulnerable to contractures. While elbow arthroscopy minimizes soft tissue damage and enhances early rehabilitation, the optimal duration for postoperative Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) therapy is unclear. This retrospective study aims to establish the appropriate duration of CPM following arthroscopic elbow contracture release.

METHODS

We analyzed postoperative outcomes from patients undergoing CPM rehabilitation for 1, 3, or 5 months. Metrics such as ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS scores, grip strength, and range of motion were assessed before surgery and at 1,3,6 and 12 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Patients who received 3 or 5 months of CPM therapy showed statistically significant improvements in elbow flexion-extension, range of motion, and functional scores (ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS) compared to the 1-month group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the 3- and 5-month groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A 3-month CPM period is effective for patients with higher functional demands, with no additional benefit from extending therapy to 5 months.

Is anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve necessary for post-traumatic elbow stiffness? A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is necessary in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study of 177 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness treated at Shandong Provincial Hospital from 1 January 2012 to 31 October 2022. Sixty-one patients presented with ulnar nerve symptoms, and 116 patients had no nerve symptoms. Outcomes between patients with and without symptoms were compared using a range of clinical measures, namely range of motion (ROM), ulnar nerve symptoms, and various standardized scoring systems, namely, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), visual analog scale (VAS), improved Broberg and Morrey Score (BMS), Quick disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Amadio score.

RESULTS

Open elbow release surgery significantly improved elbow joint function in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness, regardless of the presence of ulnar nerve symptoms. Patients with ulnar nerve symptoms showed significant improvement after anterior transposition compared with in situ release. For patients without ulnar nerve symptoms, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two types of ulnar nerve surgery.

CONCLUSION

Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is preferable for patients with ulnar nerve symptoms, while the choice between anterior transposition and in situ release can be individualized for patients without symptoms, based on intraoperative findings.

Bony encasement of the ulnar nerve secondary to heterotopic ossification of the elbow: an evaluation of long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow caused by heterotopic ossification (HO) is a rare condition. This retrospective study aims to report on 32 consecutive cases of ulnar nerve encasement caused by elbow HO and evaluate long-term outcomes of operative management and a standardized postoperative rehabilitation regimen.

METHODS

A retrospective case series was conducted on 32 elbows (27 patients) that underwent operative management of bony ulnar nerve encasement. All procedures were performed in the inpatient setting at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center from September 1999 to July 2021 by one of 3 fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow. Postoperatively, all patients received formal physical therapy, HO prophylaxis (30 received indomethacin, 2 received radiation), and a structured continuous passive motion machine regimen. Patient demographics, age, gender, type of injury, history of tobacco use, and medical comorbidities were obtained to include in the analysis. Long-term follow-up examinations were performed to evaluate elbow flexion-extension arc of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and visual analog scale pain scores.

RESULTS

Thirty-two elbows with complete bony ulnar nerve encasement secondary to HO were identified (14 from burns, 15 from trauma, 3 closed head injuries). Following surgery, the mean flexion-extension arc of motion improved significantly, increasing from 21° to 100° at long-term follow-up (average 8.7 years, range 2-17 years), with statistically significant improvements in preoperative vs. long-term postoperative elbow extension (P < .001), flexion (P < .001), and total arc of motion (P < .001). There was a statistically significant improvement in pre- vs. postprocedure ulnar nerve function, as demonstrated by a decrease in average McGowan grade (1.2-0.7; P = .002). Additionally, 63% of patients with preoperative ulnar neuropathy symptoms (20/32) had either complete resolution or subjective improvement after surgery. The mean time from injury to surgery was 518 days (range 65-943 days). Age, gender, time to surgery, and medical comorbidities were not associated with outcomes. The complication rate was 9% (3/32). Patients had an average flexion-extension arc of motion of 97° and average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 80 ("good") at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of operative management, postoperative HO prophylaxis, and a regimented rehabilitation program has proven to be a durable solution for treating and ensuring good long-term functional outcomes for patients with elbow HO and bony ulnar nerve encasement. This treatment approach leads to superior range of motion, improved or resolved ulnar neuropathy, and good to excellent long-term functional outcomes.

Effectiveness and safety of a less-invasive MCL reconstruction technique for contracted or ossified ligaments in patients with elbow stiffness: An open-label, non-randomised, prospective, multicentre trial in China

BACKGROUND

The elbow joint is sensitive to trauma from accidents, sports injuries, and surgical trauma. Some patients develop ossification or contracture of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) after elbow trauma. A less invasive reconstruction of the MCL can be performed after resection of diseased MCL. The biomechanical characteristics of this technique have been demonstrated and validated. However, its clinical effectiveness and safety require further confirmation in clinical practice.

METHODS

This open-label, non-randomised, prospective, multicentre trial included consecutive patients with elbow stiffness from five orthopaedic centres in China. Patients willing to participate in the study, with elbow stiffness caused by traumatic injury, who had reached skeletal maturity, and who had a range of motion of <100° were eligible for inclusion. Patients with immunological or metabolic causes of elbow stiffness, burns, or central nervous system injuries were excluded. In addition, patients who did not require MCL release and reconstruction after intraoperative release of other structures were also excluded. All patients underwent resection of the diseased MCL part in an open arthrolysis. Medial stability of the elbow was reconstructed using a less invasive MCL reconstruction technique that uses fascia and tendon patches. In this study, the primary outcomes, including stability, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Amadio score, were used to comprehensively evaluate this technique. Outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and annually thereafter. This study reports the results of one arm of the trial that has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (chictr.org.cn), ChiCTR-INC-16010019.

FINDINGS

Between January 1, 2017 and March 1, 2020, 104 eligible patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up time was 43·47 (95% CI, 41·45 - 45·49) months. Among all 104 patients, 100 (96%) patients who underwent MCL reconstruction retained medial stability at the last follow-up. All outcomes from the last follow-up were used for comparison with the preoperative outcomes. No differences in preoperative and postoperative stability scores were observed (P = 0·7820). Extension, flexion, pronation, and supination of the injured elbow improved significantly (P < 0·0001, P < 0·0001, P < 0·0001, P < 0·0001). The mean range of motion (ROM) and forearm rotational range of motion (FRR) increased by 71·25° (152%) (P < 0·0001) and 30·83° (25%) (P < 0·0001), respectively. Additionally, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and muscle strength had increased after evaluation at follow-ups (P < 0·0001, P < 0·0001). Drastic pain relief and nerve symptom reduction were observed, as evaluated using VAS scores and Amadio scores, respectively (P < 0·0001, P < 0·0001). Seventeen (16%) patients experienced a recurrence of elbow stiffness of varying severity, but only two patients had poor or fair results. Several common and non-severe complications, including infection in one (1%) patient, new nerve symptoms in seven (7%) patients, new pain in one (1%) patient, fracture in one (1%) patient, and valgus instability in four (4%) patients, were observed and properly treated in this study.

INTERPRETATION

The less invasive MCL reconstruction technique using fascia and tendon patches is an effective method for restoring medial stability in patients with elbow stiffness after complete arthrolysis with certain safety. The technique shows prospects for elbow MCL reconstruction in clinical practice.

FUNDING

The study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFC2400805), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81830076), Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by Cast (No. YESS20200153), Shanghai Sailing Program (No. 20YF1436000), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Foundation (No.19ZR1439200), Municipal Hospital Newly-developing Cutting-edge Technologies Joint Research Program of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Centre (No. SHDC12018130).

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for open elbow arthrolysis : the Shanghai Prediction model for Elbow Stiffness Surgical Outcome

AIMS

The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a prognostic nomogram to predict the probability of gaining a functional range of motion (ROM ≥ 120°) after open arthrolysis of the elbow in patients with post-traumatic stiffness of the elbow.

METHODS

We developed the Shanghai Prediction Model for Elbow Stiffness Surgical Outcome (SPESSO) based on a dataset of 551 patients who underwent open arthrolysis of the elbow in four institutions. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize the selection of relevant features. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to build the SPESSO. Its prediction performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and a calibration graph. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping validation.

RESULTS

BMI, the duration of stiffness, the preoperative ROM, the preoperative intensity of pain, and grade of post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow were identified as predictors of outcome and incorporated to construct the nomogram. SPESSO displayed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.81). A high C-index value of 0.70 could still be reached in the interval validation. The calibration graph showed good agreement between the nomogram prediction and the outcome.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed SPESSO is a valid and convenient model which can be used to predict the outcome of open arthrolysis of the elbow. It could assist clinicians in counselling patients regarding the choice and expectations of treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):486-494.

Primary Versus Secondary Radiotherapy for Heterotopic Ossification Prevention About the Elbow

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy for the prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) about the elbow.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who received prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) over a 15-year period were identified. Patients were included if they received XRT to the elbow joint and had at least 12 weeks of follow-up after XRT. Fifty-four patients were ultimately included.

INTERVENTION

All patients were treated with a single dose of 7 Gy. Ninety-eight percentage of patients received XRT within 24 hours after surgery, and all patients received XRT within 72 hours after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS

The primary study measures evaluated were the presence or absence of clinically symptomatic HO and the presence of radiographic HO after XRT to the elbow joint.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were treated with XRT after a traumatic injury requiring surgery (primary prophylaxis), and 36 were treated with XRT after excision surgery to remove HO which had already formed (secondary prophylaxis). In the primary cohort, 16.7% developed symptomatic HO after XRT and 11.1% required surgery to resect the heterotopic bone. In the secondary cohort, 11.1% developed symptomatic HO after surgery and XRT and 5.5% required resection surgery. No secondary malignancies were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that XRT for elbow HO may be safe and effective for both primary and secondary HO. XRT for HO was not shown to be associated with radiation-induced sarcoma in this series, at least in the short term. Further study in a large patient population with extended follow-up is required to better characterize populations at high risk for development of HO and secondary malignancy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors for the Occurrence and Progression of Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness: A Case-Control Study of 688 Cases

Background: Elbow stiffness is a severe complication after trauma. Surgical or conservative treatments may be ineffective for restoring functional elbow motion. We aim to evaluate intrinsic and extrinsic factors for the occurrence and severity of elbow stiffness.

Methods: This retrospective case–control study included mild/moderate stiffness, severe stiffness, and non-stiffness groups between January 2011 and December 2017 at a single orthopedic center. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and subgroup analysis were used to evaluate age, gender, body mass index, muscle strength, fracture type and site, injury mechanism, immobilization time, elbow dysfunction time, multiple surgeries, nerve symptoms, physical therapy, smoking and alcohol abuse, and dominant hand of stiff elbow as potential risk factors for the occurrence and severity of elbow stiffness.

Results: There were 461 patients in the stiffness group and 227 patients in the non-stiffness group. The odds ratios (ORs) of the age, muscle strength, and injury mechanism were 0.960, 0.333, and 0.216 for the occurrence of elbow stiffness. In subgroup evaluation, increased cast immobilization time might be a risk factor for patients receiving conservative therapies (OR = 2.02; p = 0.014). In the evaluation on factors for progression of elbow stiffness, “multiple surgeries” might be a risk factor in surgical treatment by subgroup analysis (OR = 1.943; p = 0.026). Nevertheless, alcohol abuse might increase severity of elbow stiffness in conservatively treated patients (OR = 3.082; p = 0.025).

Conclusion: Increased cast immobilization time in the conservative therapy might be a risk factor for stiffness occurrence. Multiple surgeries might be risk factors for stiffness progression. Alcohol abuse potentially increased stiffness severity after conservative treatment.

A new pathologic classification for elbow stiffness based on our experience in 216 patients

BACKGROUND

Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EF_I, tethers alone; EF_II, tethers with blocks; EF_III, articular malformation; and EF_IV, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FR_I, contracture alone; FR_II, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FR_III, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EF_I patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EF_IV patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EF_III patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FR_I patients (142°), followed by FR_II patients (118°), and worst in FR_III patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FR_III patients (82°), followed by FR_II patients (64°), and least in FR_I patients (37°).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.

What Range of Motion and Functional Results Can Be Expected After Open Arthrolysis with Hinged External Fixation For Severe Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness?

BACKGROUND

The elbow is more susceptible to loss of motion after trauma than any other joint. Open arthrolysis often is performed for posttraumatic elbow stiffness if the stiffness does not improve with nonsurgical treatment, but the midterm results of this procedure and factors that may limit recovery have not been widely studied.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We reviewed patients who had undergone open arthrolysis with hinged external fixator for severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness (ROM ≤ 60°) with a minimum of 5 years followup to (1) analyze ROM gains; (2) assess functional improvement with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and DASH, quality of life with the SF-36, pain with VAS, and ulnar nerve function with the Amadio rating scale and Dellon classification; and (3) identify complications and risk factors that might hinder mid-term elbow motion recovery after this procedure.

METHODS

Between March 2011 and December 2012, we generally offered patients with elbow stiffness an open arthrolysis procedure when function did not improve with 6 months of nonoperative therapy, and no contraindications such as immature heterotopic ossification or complete destruction of articular cartilage were present. During that time, 161 patients underwent open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness at our institution; 49 of them satisfied the study inclusion criteria (adults with elbow ROM ≤ 60° as a result of trauma) and exclusion criteria (stiffness caused by burns or central nervous system injuries, causative trauma associated with nonunion or malunion of the elbow, severe articular damage that would have necessitated joint arthroplasty, or prior elbow release). In general, a combined medial-lateral approach to the elbow was performed to address the soft tissue tethers and any blocks to elbow motion, and a hinged external fixator was applied for 6 weeks to maintain elbow stability and improve the efficacy of postoperative rehabilitation. These patients were evaluated retrospectively at a mean followup period of 69 months (range, 62-83 months), and demographics, disease characteristics, arthrolysis details, pre- and postoutcome measures as noted, and complications were recorded via an electronic database. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM recovery.

RESULTS

At final followup, total ROM increased from a preoperative mean of 27 ± 20° to a postoperative mean of 131 ± 11° (mean difference, 104°; 95% CI, 98°-111°; p < 0.001), and 98% (48 of 49) of patients achieved a functional ROM of 30° to 130°. Improvements were also found in functional scores (MEPI: 54 ± 12 to 95 ± 7, mean difference, 41 points; DASH: 48 ± 17 to 8 ± 8, mean difference, 40 points; both p < 0.001), life quality (physical SF-36: 46 ± 11 to 81 ± 12, mean difference, 35 points; mental SF-36: 43 ± 14 to 80 ± 9, mean difference, 37 points; both p < .001), pain (VAS: 2.5 ± 2.4 to 0.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 2.0 points; p < 0.001), and ulnar nerve function (Amadio score: 7.8 ± 1.9 to 8.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 0.6 points; p = 0.004). A total of 18% (nine of 49 patients) developed complications, including new-onset or exacerbated nerve symptoms (four patients), recurrent heterotopic ossification (two patients), and pin-related infections (three patients). No patients underwent subsequent surgery for any of the above complications. Lastly, the medium-term ROM was divided into ROM ≤ 120° (n = 9) and ROM > 120° (n = 40). After controlling for potential confounding variables such as duration of stiffness and tobacco use, we found that tobacco use was the only independent risk factor examined (odds ratio, 9; 95% CI, 2-47; p = 0.009) associated with recovery of ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory medium-term results were found for open arthrolysis with hinged external fixation with our protocol in patients who had severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness. Appropriate and sufficient releases of tethered soft tissues and correction of any blocks that affect elbow motion intraoperatively, a dedicated team approach, and an aggressive and systematic postoperative rehabilitation program are the core steps for this procedure. Additionally, the importance of preoperative discontinuation of tobacco use should be emphasized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Determining the effective timing of an open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Following trauma, the elbow is the most susceptible to restricted motion among all joints. Open arthrolysis is often performed for post-traumatic elbow stiffness if that stiffness does not improve with non-operative management. However, the optimal timing for performing an open arthrolysis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome (elbow motion and function) and the rate of complications among patients who had undergone early, median and late release procedures to establish an optimal time interval following the injury, after which, an effective open arthrolysis can be performed.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we included total 133 patients, who had undergone open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. The subjects were divided into 3 groups, with 31 patients in the early release group (arthrolysis performed at 6–10 months after injury), 78 patients in the median release group (at 11–20 months), and 24 patients in the late release group (at > 20 months). The release procedure in all patients was performed by the same surgeon, using the same technique. The general data, functional performance, and complications, if any, were retrospectively documented for all patients and statistically analysed.

Results

The demographic data and disease characteristics of all patients were comparable at baseline. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found among the three groups with respect to the range of motion (p = 0.067), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p = 0.350) and its ratings (p = 0.329), visual analog scale score for pain (p = 0.227), Dellon classification for ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.497), and each discrete complication (all p values > 0.05).

Conclusions

At the final follow-up, our results showed no significant difference in the postoperative elbow motion capacities, functional scores and the rates of complications among patients who had undergone an early, median, and late release. Therefore, we have recommended that an early arthrolysis would be preferable due to its multiple advantages, and the conventionally observed interval of > 1 year after the injury, could be shortened.

Level of evidence

Level III; Retrospective Cohort Design; Therapeutic Study.

Characteristics and management of bone and joint tuberculosis in native and migrant population in Shanghai during 2011 to 2015

Background

China had the third highest burden of tuberculosis population in the world. Bone and joint tuberculosis was a major part and its characteristics were rarely discussed before. This study was designed to review the characteristics and management of bone and joint tuberculosis among native and migrant population in Shanghai, China during 2011–2015.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the patient clinical records on their demographic information, clinical features and treatment was conducted from three tertiary referral hospitals. Analysis of continuous variables included calculation of the median value with interquartile range. Categorical variables were displayed as percentages and compared using the Fisher’s exact test and chi-square test. All continuous variables were compared using Student’s unpaired t-test and Mann Whitney U test.

Results

One hundred fifteen patients with bone and joint tuberculosis were involved in this study. Native people were generally older (p = 0.003) and had more comorbidities like hypertension (40.74% vs. 16.39%, p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (38.89% vs. 13.11%, p = 0.001), and cancer (31.48% vs. 14.75%, p = 0.032) than migrants. Migrant patients generally experienced a longer period of uncomfortable feelings before going to doctor than native people (p = 0.007). Spine was a major infection site in comparison with other peripheral joints. Radiological evaluation displayed increased osteolytic reaction in migrant patients compared with native people (p = 0.031). The mean time for anti-tuberculosis treatment was significantly longer in native Shanghai patients (8.96 months vs. 7.94 months, p = 0.003). The curative ratio displayed a significant difference between native and migrant patients (88.24%vs.75.93%, p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Bone and joint tuberculosis exhibited a poorer outcome in migrant people, who also had longer period of manifestation, more severe osteolytic reaction from CT scan and higher recurrent rate than native people. The surgical treatment in addition to anti-tuberculosis drug therapy had great implications for bone and joint tuberculosis recovery.

Validation of the Liverpool Elbow Score for evaluation of elbow stiffness

Background

The Liverpool Elbow Score (LES) has been widely used to assess the outcomes of total elbow replacement in various conditions. However, there have been no published validation studies on LES for patients with stiff elbows undergoing arthrolysis. The purpose of this study was to find out whether LES could be equally applied to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness.

Methods

A total of 63 patients with elbow stiffness were included in this retrospective validation study. The LES combines a nine-item patient-answered questionnaire (PAQ) and a six-item clinical assessment score (CAS), and can also be divided to evaluate two different parameters: elbow motion capacity (EMC) and elbow-related symptoms (ERS). Construct validity was assessed by correlating LES with previously validated scoring systems, and Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) were calculated. Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated to determine responsiveness.

Results

There were no ceiling or floor effects in the target population. Good-to-excellent validity was determined based on total score (0.45–0.89), PAQ (0.42–0.88), CAS (0.35–0.60), EMC (0.46–0.86), and ERS (0.36–0.59). High responsiveness (ES/SRM) was observed in total score (2.80/2.24), PAQ (2.34/1.78), CAS (2.90/2.34), EMC (2.92/2.35), and ERS (0.55/0.52).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the LES is a valid elbow-specific scoring system that can be used to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness, though some items included had some weakness either.