Manipulation Under Anesthesia and Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Risk factors for failure of manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is a well-established treatment for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Risk factors for failure of MUA remain largely unknown. The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of MUA after TKA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including 470 patients who underwent MUA after primary TKA with minimum 2 year follow-up. Patients were grouped into success (n = 412) or failure (n = 58) cohorts; failure was defined as flexion < 90° at most recent follow-up or revision for stiffness. The increase in flexion post-MUA for the cohort was calculated. Several clinical, patient, and surgical factors were analyzed using univariate, followed by multivariable logistic regression models to identify independent risk factors associated with failure.

RESULTS

The mean increase in flexion was 42° (range 0-115). BMI 30-35 (p = 0.01, odds ratio (OR) 2.42; 95% CI 1.25-4.68) and poorer pre-MUA flexion (p < 0.01, OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.23-1.67) were risk factors for failure. When considering revision for stiffness only, BMI 30-35 (p = 0.01, OR 3.27; 95% CI 1.41-7.61), lower pre-MUA flexion (p < 0.01, OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.18-1.75), and history of prior knee surgery (p = 0.04, OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.06-5.04) were predictors of failure. Time to MUA (p = 0.48), thromboprophylaxis (p = 0.44), pre-operative opioid use (p = 0.34), depression/anxiety (p = 1.0), and several other factors analyzed were not associated with failure.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort, elevated BMI and lower pre-MUA flexion were risk factors for failure of MUA. History of prior knee surgery was an additional predictor of requiring revision for stiffness.

Specific Preoperative Factors Increase Manipulations under Anesthesia Following Primary TKA

Arthrofibrosis following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can result in pain and limit postoperative range of motion (ROM), jeopardizing clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. This study aims to identify preoperative risk factors associated with necessitating a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following primary TKA.We retrospectively reviewed 950 cases of consecutive primary TKAs performed at one institution by three arthroplasty surgeons between May 2017 and May 2019. Recorded preoperative variables included smoking status, race, preoperative ROM, presence of effusion or positive anterior drawer, and medical comorbidities. Demographic characteristics were compared with Student's t-tests or chi-square tests as appropriate. For each preoperative factor, we obtained an odds ratio (OR) for MUA risk using multivariate logistic regression.Twenty (2.3%) patients underwent MUA following their index primary TKA surgery. History of ipsilateral knee surgery (OR: 2.727, p = 0.047) and diagnosed hypertension (OR: 4.764, p = 0.016) were identified as risk factors associated with significantly increased risk of MUA. The greater the preoperative ROM, the higher likelihood needed of MUA (OR: 1.031, p = 0.034).Patients who had diagnosed hypertension or a history of prior ipsilateral knee surgery were associated with increased risk of necessitating an MUA following primary TKA. Additionally, a greater total arc of motion preoperatively increased the odds of needing MUA.Level III of evidence was present.

Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often treated with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). However, there is debate regarding the timing of MUA, with many recommending against MUA beyond 3 months after TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of early versus delayed MUA for stiffness following TKA.

METHODS

A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases in November 2023. Data regarding study characteristics, demographics, knee flexion and extension, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revisions were collected. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies. Included were 14 studies analyzing 13,445 knees, 72.1% of which underwent early MUA and 27.8% of which underwent delayed MUA. Of the 14 studies, 10 defined early MUA as being performed within 3 months of the index TKA.

RESULTS

Pre-MUA and post-MUA knee flexion for the early/delayed groups was 71.3°/77.9° and 103.0°/96.1°, respectively. Upon meta-analysis, pre-MUA knee flexion was significantly higher in the delayed group (P = .003), whereas post-MUA flexion was similar in both groups (P = .36). The mean gain in knee flexion for the early and delayed groups was 32.0°/19.2°. The surgical complication and revision TKA rates for the early and delayed groups were 4.9%/10.3% and 5%/9%, respectively. A meta-analysis found the risk of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA to be significantly higher in the delayed MUA group (P < .00001 and = .002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although post-MUA knee flexion was similar in patients undergoing early and delayed MUA following TKA, the mean gain in flexion for early patients was nearly double that of delayed patients. Delayed patients also had significantly higher risks of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA following MUA.

Complications of Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Importance of Alignment and Balance

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR TKA) results in kinematics closer to the native knee and in greater patient satisfaction but information concerning its outcome and complications is lacking.The goal of this study is to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of BCR prosthesis implanted using a spacer-based gap balancing technique and to assess if some preoperative factors are associated with a worse prognosis.A cohort of 207 knees in 194 patients who underwent BCR TKA, with a minimum 1-year follow-up, was retrospectively analyzed.Patients were followed at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and then every following year postoperatively, and filled questionnaires (Knee Society and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) at every visit. Clinical and radiological assessments included range of motion, knee alignment, pain, and complications as defined by the Knee Society's Standardized list and definition of Complication of Total Knee Arthroplasty.Forty-three knees (20.8%) suffered major complications. Twenty-one knees (10.1%) underwent revision at an average of 32.1 months after the index procedure. Revision-free survival at 100 months was 85.7%. Revision was performed for aseptic tibial loosening in eight knees (3.9%) and stiffness in five knees (2.4%). There were 29 reoperations other than revision (14.0%), the most frequent procedure being manipulation under anesthesia in 14 knees (6.8%). Minor complications included tendonitis (20.8%), persistent synovitis (6.8%), and superficial wound infections (6.3%).All outcomes scores were greatly improved at the 1-year follow-up compared with preoperatively (p < 0.001). However, maximum flexion at the last follow-up was significantly reduced compared with preoperatively (mean maximum flexion ± standard deviation: 119.9 ± 15.6 vs. 129.9 ± 14.4, p < 0.001). Aseptic tibial loosening was associated with a hypercorrection in varus of preoperative valgus knees (p = 0.012).BCR TKA can give functional results similar to other types of prostheses but involves a substantial risk of complications. Important factors that can explain failed BCR TKA and guide its use were identified, more particularly knee alignment and its role in aseptic tibial loosening.

Perioperative Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Non-English Speakers

BACKGROUND

Many studies have demonstrated that in patients whose primary language is not English, outcomes after an orthopaedic surgery are worse compared to primary English speakers. The goal of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who prefer English as their first language versus those who prefer a different language.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary TKA from May 2012 to July 2021. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether English was their preferred primary language (PPL). Of the 13,447 patients who underwent primary TKA, 11,290 reported English as their PPL, and 2,157 preferred a language other than English. Patients whose PPL was not English were further stratified based on whether they requested interpreter services. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the significance of perioperative outcomes while controlling for demographic differences.

RESULTS

Our analysis found that non-English PPL patients had significantly lower rates of readmission (P = .040), overall revision (P = .028), and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA; P = .025) within 90 days postoperatively. Sub analyses of the non-English PPL group showed that those who requested interpreter services had significantly lower 1-year revision (P < .001) and overall MUA (P = .049) rates.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that TKA patients who communicated in English without an interpreter were significantly more likely to undergo revision, readmission, and MUA. These findings may suggest that language barriers may make it more difficult to identify postoperative problems or concerns in non-English speakers, which may limit appropriate postoperative care.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Risk of Acute Infection Following Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection During Total Knee Manipulation Under Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an established option for improving motion in patients presenting with early stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are sometimes administered adjunctively, yet literature examining their efficacy and safety remains limited.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, Level IV METHODS: A total of 209 patients (TKA = 230) were retrospectively examined to determine the incidence of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) within 3 months following manipulation with IACI. Approximately 4.9% of initial patients had inadequate follow-up where the presence of infection could not be determined. Range of motion (ROM) was assessed in patients who had follow-up at or beyond 1 year (n=158) and was recorded over multiple time points.

RESULTS

No infections (0 of 230) were identified within 90 days of receiving IACI during TKA MUA. Before receiving TKA (pre-index) patients averaged 111⁰ of total arc of motion (TAM) and 113⁰ of flexion. Following index procedures, just prior to manipulation (pre-MUA), patient's averaged 83⁰ and 86⁰ of total arc and flexion motion respectively. At final follow-up, patients averaged 110⁰ of TAM and 111⁰ of flexion. At 6 weeks following manipulation, patients had gained a mean of 25⁰ and 24⁰ of their total arc and flexion motion found at 1 year. This motion was preserved through a 12 month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Administering IACI during TKA MUA does not harbor an elevated risk for acute PJI. Additionally, its use is associated with substantial increases in short-term ROM at 6 weeks following manipulation, which remains preserved through long-term follow-up.

Revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis improves range of motion

PURPOSE

Arthrofibrosis after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a significant contributor to patient dissatisfaction. While treatment algorithms involve early physical therapy and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), some patients ultimately require revision TKA. It is unclear whether revision TKA can consistently improve these patient's range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate ROM when revision TKA was performed for arthrofibrosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 42 TKA's diagnosed with arthrofibrosis from 2013 to 2019 at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. The primary outcome was ROM (flexion, extension, and total arc of motion) before and after revision TKA, and secondary outcomes included patient reported outcomes information system (PROMIS) scores. Categorical data were compared using chi-squared analysis, and paired samples t tests were performed to compare ROM at three different times: pre-primary TKA, pre-revision TKA, and post-revision TKA. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess for effect modification on total ROM.

RESULTS

The patient's pre-revision mean flexion was 85.6 degrees, and mean extension was 10.1 degrees. At the time of the revision, the mean age of the cohort was 64.7 years, the average body mass index (BMI) was 29.8, and 62% were female. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, revision TKA significantly improved terminal flexion by 18.4 degrees (p < 0.001), terminal extension by 6.8 degrees (p = 0.007), and total arc of motion by 25.2 degrees (p < 0.001). The final ROM after revision TKA was not significantly different from the patient's pre-primary TKA ROM (p = 0.759). PROMIS physical function, depression, and pain interference scores were 39 (SD = 7.72), 49 (SD = 8.39), and 62 (SD = 7.25), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Revision TKA for arthrofibrosis significantly improved ROM at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years with over 25 degrees of improvement in the total arc of motion, resulting in final ROM similar to pre-primary TKA ROM. PROMIS physical function and pain scores showed moderate dysfunction, while depression scores were within normal limits. While physical therapy and MUA remain the gold standard for the early treatment of stiffness after TKA, revision TKA can improve ROM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia is Safe After Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is thought to facilitate durable, biological fixation between the bone and implant. However, the 4-12 weeks required for osseointegration coincides with the optimal timeframe to perform a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) if a patient develops postoperative stiffness. This study aims to determine the impact of early MUA on cementless fixation by comparing functional outcomes and survivorship of cementless and cemented TKAs.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who underwent MUA for postoperative stiffness within 90 days of primary, unilateral TKA at 2 academic institutions between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Cases involving extensive hardware removal were excluded. Cementless TKAs undergoing MUA (n = 100) were propensity matched 1:1 to cemented TKAs undergoing MUA (n = 100) using age, gender, body mass index, and year of surgery. Both groups had comparable baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), Short Form (SF)-12 Physical, and SF-12 Mental scores. MUA-related complications as well as postoperative KOOS and SF-12 scores were compared.

RESULTS

MUA-related complications were equivalently low in both groups (P = .324), with only 1 patella component dissociation in the cementless group. No tibial or femoral components acutely loosened in the perioperative period. Postoperative KOOS (P = .101) and SF-12 Mental scores (P = .380) were similar between groups. Six-year survivorship free from any revision after MUA was 98.0% in both groups (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative MUA after cementless TKA was not associated with increased MUA-related complications or worse patient-reported outcomes compared to cemented TKA. Short-term survivorship was also comparable, suggesting high durability of the bone-implant interface.

Computer-based analysis of different component positions and insert thicknesses on tibio-femoral and patello-femoral joint dynamics after cruciate-retaining total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Positioning of the implant components and tibial insert thickness constitute critical aspects of total knee replacement (TKR) that influence the postoperative knee joint dynamics. This study aimed to investigate the impact of implant component positioning (anterior-posterior and medio-lateral shift) and varying tibial insert thickness on the tibio-femoral (TF) and patello-femoral (PF) joint kinematics and contact forces after cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKR.

METHOD

A validated musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model with a fixed-bearing CR-TKR during a squat motion up to 90° knee flexion was deployed to calculate PF and TF joint dynamics for varied implant component positions and tibial insert thicknesses. Evaluation was performed consecutively by comparing the respective knee joint parameters (e.g. contact force, quadriceps muscle force, joint kinematics) to a reference implant position.

RESULTS

The PF contact forces were mostly affected by the anterior-posterior as well as medio-lateral positioning of the femoral component (by 3 mm anterior up to 31 % and by 6 mm lateral up to 14 %). TF contact forces were considerably altered by tibial insert thickness (24 % in case of + 4 mm increase) and by the anterior-posterior position of the femoral component (by 3 mm posterior up to 16 %). Concerning PF kinematics, a medialised femoral component by 6 mm increased the lateral patellar tilt by more than 5°.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that regarding PF kinematics and contact forces the positioning of the femoral component was more critical than the tibial component. The positioning of the femoral component in anterior-posterior direction on and PF contact force was evident. Orthopaedic surgeons should strictly monitor the anterior-posterior as well as the medio-lateral position of the femoral component and the insert thickness.

Early manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty is associated with a greater gain in knee flexion

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and whether performing an 'early' MUA within 3 months leads to a greater improvement in range of motion.

METHODS

Primary TKAs performed between 2013 and 2018 at three tertiary New Zealand hospitals were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Clinical details of patients who underwent MUA were reviewed to identify the knee flexion angle prior to and following MUA. Multivariate analysis identified the risk factors for undergoing MUA and compared flexion angles between 'early' (< 3 months) and 'late' MUA (> 3 months).

RESULTS

A total of 7386 primary TKAs were analysed in which 131 underwent an MUA (1.8%). Patients aged < 65 years were two times more likely to undergo MUA compared to patients aged ≥ 65 years (2.5 versus 1.3%, p < 0.001; adjusted HR = 2.1, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the final flexion angle post-MUA between early and late MUA (104.7° versus 104.1°, p = 0.819). However, patients who underwent early MUA had poorer pre-MUA flexion (72.3° versus 79.6°, p = 0.012), and subsequently had a greater overall gain in flexion compared to those who underwent late MUA (mean gain 33.1° versus 24.3°, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Younger age was the only patient risk factor for MUA. Patients who underwent early MUA had similar post-MUA flexion, but had poorer pre-MUA flexion compared to those who underwent late MUA. Subsequently, a greater overall gain in flexion was achieved in those who underwent early MUA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Development and Early Experience of a Destination Center of Excellence Program for Total Joint Arthroplasty

High-volume total joint arthroplasty centers are becoming designated as destination centers of excellence to ensure quality of care while containing costs. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical patient journey through a new destination center of excellence program, review acute perioperative course trajectories, and report clinical outcomes. Our institution developed and implemented a destination center of excellence program to integrate into the existing total joint arthroplasty practice. A retrospective record review and analysis were performed for the first 100 destination center of excellence total knee arthroplasties and total hip arthroplasties enrolled in the program to evaluate program efficacy at a minimum 1-year follow-up. The study initially screened 213 patients, of whom 100 (47%) met program criteria and completed surgery (67 total knee arthroplasties and 33 total hip arthroplasties). The complication rate was 2%, and five patients (7.5%) required manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Two reoperations were needed: a neurectomy after total knee arthroplasty and a revision after total hip arthroplasty. The early experience of a destination center of excellence program has been favorable, with low complication rates and excellent outcomes.

Understanding rates, risk factors, and complications associated with manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): An analysis of 100,613 TKAs

BACKGROUND

Considering the growing adoption of technology-assisted total knee arthroplasties (TKA), previous database studies evaluating post-operative stiffness may be outdated. The present study aimed to: (1) evaluate the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) after primary TKA; (2) determine independent risk factors for MUA; and (3) assess complications after MUA.

METHODS

Primary TKAs, with at least 6-month follow-up, were identified from the Florida State Inpatient Database (January 2016-June 2018) and linked to outpatient records from the Florida State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to compare patient factors and complications (e.g., mechanical, non-mechanical, infectious) associated with MUA, while adjusting for baseline demographics, comorbidities, use of robotic- and computer-technologies, time to MUA (0-3, 3-12, or >12 months), and need for repeat MUA (one-time vs >1).

RESULTS

The MUA rate was 2.8% (2821 of 100,613). Being younger, a woman, Black or Hispanic; having private or self-pay insurance; and conventional TKA were associated with significantly higher odds of undergoing MUA. Higher rates of mechanical complications and acute posthemorrhagic anemia were observed in the MUA cohort. Time to MUA, repeat MUA, and baseline demographics were not associated with complication rates among the MUA cohort.

CONCLUSION

Overall, 1 in 36 patients underwent MUA after primary TKA. Several non-modifiable patient characteristics, such as Black or Hispanic race, female sex, and younger age were associated with an increased risk of MUA. However, technology-assisted TKA might help to decrease the risk of MUA.

The Effect of Early versus Late Manipulation Under Anesthesia on Opioid Use, Surgical Complications, and Revision Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Previous studies of early versus late manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) do not report on postoperative opioid utilization or revisions and focused on small single-institution retrospective cohorts. The PearlDiver Research Program (www.pearldiverinc.com), which uses an all-inclusive insurance database, was used to identify patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who received (1) late MUA (>12 weeks), (2) early MUA (≤12 weeks), or (3) TKA only. To develop the control group cohort of TKA-only patients, 3:1 matching was conducted using 11 risk factor variables deemed significant by chi-squared analysis. Complications and opioid utilization were compared through multivariate regression analysis, controlling for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. The risk of TKA revision was assessed through Cox-proportional hazards modeling and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test. Between 2011 and 2017, 2,062 TKA patients with early MUA, 1,112 TKA patients with late MUA, and a control cohort of 8,327 TKA-only patients were identified in the database. The percent of patients registering opioid use decreased from 54.6% 1 month pre-MUA to 4.6% (p < 0.0001) 1 month post-MUA following early MUA, whereas only from 32.6 to 10.4% (p < 0.0001) following late MUA. Late MUA was associated with higher risk of repeat MUA at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.74, p < 0.0001), 1 year (aOR = 2.66, p < 0.0001), and 2 years (aOR = 2.63, p < 0.0001) following index MUA. Hazards modeling and survival analysis showed increased risk of TKA revision following late MUA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.77-4.43, p < 0.0001) compared to early MUA (aHR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.72-2.70, p < 0.0001), with significant differences in survival to revision curves (p < 0.0001). When compared to early MUA at 1 year, late MUA was associated with a significantly increased risk of prosthesis explantation (aOR = 2.89, p = 0.0026 vs. aOR = 0.93, p = 0.8563). MUA within 12 weeks after index TKA had improved pain resolution and significant curtailing of opioid use. Furthermore, late MUA was associated with prolonged opioid use, increased risks of revision, as well as prosthesis explantation, supporting screening and early intervention in cases of slow progression and stiffness. The level of evidence of this study is III.

Aspirin Administered for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis May Protect Against Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Aspirin has become the main agent for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study assessed whether aspirin is associated with less knee stiffness compared to warfarin and other chemoprophylaxis agents.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all primary and revision TKAs performed between January 2009 and October 2020 at a high volume institution. Demographics, comorbidity data, and operative variables were extracted from medical records. VTE prophylaxis administered during this time period included aspirin, warfarin, and "others" (factor Xa, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, fondaparinux, adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor, and direct thrombin inhibitor). The primary outcome assessed was manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) performed within 6 months of index surgery. Secondary outcome included major bleeding events. Univariate followed by multivariate regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 15,903 cases were included in the study, of which 531 (3.3%) patients developed stiffness that required MUA. The rates of MUA were 2.7% (251/9223) for patients receiving aspirin, 4.2% (238/5709) for patients receiving warfarin, and 4.3% (42/971) for all others (P's < .001). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that aspirin is associated with lower rates of VTE compared to warfarin (adjusted odds ratio 1.423, 95% confidence interval 1.158-1.747, P < .001) and compared to other anticoagulation medications (adjusted odds ratio 1.742, 95% confidence interval 1.122-2.704, P = .013). Major bleeding events were also significantly lower in patients who received aspirin compared to the other 2 groups (P's = .001).

CONCLUSION

Aspirin prophylaxis is associated with lower rates of MUA following TKA compared to warfarin and other VTE chemoprophylactic agents when grouped together.

Postoperative pain as a risk factor for stiff knee following total knee arthroplasty and excellent patientreported outcomes after manipulation under anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is the first-choice treatment for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) unresponsive to pain management and physiotherapy. Some of the predisposing factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following MUA remain poorly studied. We retrospectively investigated the etiological risk factors and the outcomes of MUA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

391 TKA patients from a randomized trial comparing the use of a tourniquet and anesthesia (spinal or general) were analyzed, and patients needing MUA were identified (MUA group). We evaluated in-hospital opioid consumption, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range of motion (ROM), and pain assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory-short form with a 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

39 (10%) MUA patients were identified. The MUA patients were younger (60 years vs. 64 years, difference -4, 95% CI -6 to -1) and had higher postoperative oxycodone consumption (66 mg vs. 51 mg, median difference 11, CI 1-22) than the no-MUA patients. The proportion of MUA patients who contacted the emergency department within 3 months because of pain was larger than that of non-MUA patients (41% vs. 12%, OR 5, CI 3-10). At the 1-year follow-up, the ROM was improved by 39° following MUA, but the total ROM was worse in the MUA group (115° vs. 124°, p < 0.001). No difference was found in the OKS between the MUA and no-MUA patients.

INTERPRETATION

Higher postoperative pain seems to predict MUA risk. MUA performed 3 months postoperatively offers substantial ROM improvement and comparable PROMs to no-MUA patients 1 year after TKA.

Manipulation under anaesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty : minimal differences in intravenous sedation alone versus neuraxial anaesthesia

AIMS

Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) remains an effective intervention to address restricted range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and occurs in 2% to 3% of primary TKAs at our institution. Since there are few data on the outcomes of MUA with different anaesthetic methods, we sought to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing MUA with intravenous (IV) sedation and neuraxial anaesthesia.

METHODS

We identified 548 MUAs after primary TKA (136 IV sedation, 412 neuraxial anaesthesia plus IV sedation) from March 2016 to July 2019. The mean age of this cohort was 62 years (35 to 88) with a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m² (18 to 49). The mean time from primary TKA to MUA was 10.2 weeks (6.2 to 24.3). Pre-MUA ROM was similar between groups; overall mean pre-MUA extension was 4.2° (p = 0.452) and mean pre-MUA flexion was 77° (p = 0.372). We compared orthopaedic complications, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and immediate and three-month follow-up knee ROM between these groups.

RESULTS

Following MUA, patients with IV sedation had higher mean VAS pain scores of 5.2 (SD 1.8) compared to 4.1 (SD = 1.5) in the neuraxial group (p < 0.001). The mean LOS was shorter in patients that received IV sedation (9.5 hours (4 to 31)) compared to neuraxial anaesthesia (11.9 hours (4 to 51)) (p = 0.009), but an unexpected overnight stay was similar in each group (8.6%). Immediate-post MUA ROM was 1° to 121° in the IV sedation group and 0.9° to 123° in the neuraxial group (p = 0.313). Three-month follow-up ROM was 2° to 108° in the IV sedation group and 1.9° to 110° in the neuraxial anaesthesia group (p = 0.325) with a mean loss of 13° (ranging from 5° gain to 60° loss), in both groups by three months. No patients in either group sustained a complication.

CONCLUSION

IV sedation alone and neuraxial anaesthesia are both effective anaesthetic methods for MUA after primary TKA. Surgeons and anaesthetists should offer these anaesthetic techniques to match patient-specific needs as the orthopaedic outcomes are similar. Also, patients should be counselled that ROM following MUA may decrease over time. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):126-130.

Lysis of Adhesion for Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Risk of Subsequent Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine incidence of lysis of adhesion (LOA) for postoperative arthrofibrosis following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patient factors associated with LOA, and impact of LOA on revision TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary TKA were identified in the Humana and Medicare databases. Patients who underwent LOA within 1 year after TKA were defined as the "LOA" cohort. Multiple binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to identify patient factors associated with undergoing LOA within 1 year after index TKA, and identify risk factors including LOA on risk for revision TKA within 2 years of index TKA.

RESULTS

In total, 58,538 and 48,336 patients underwent primary TKA in the Medicare and Humana databases, respectively. Incidence of LOA within 1 year after TKA was 0.56% in both databases. Age <75 years was a significant predictor of LOA in both databases (P < .05 for both). Incidence of revision TKA was significantly higher for the "LOA" cohort when compared to the "TKA Only" cohort in both databases (P < .0001 for both). LOA was the strongest predictor of revision TKA within 2 years after index TKA in both databases (P < .0001 for both). Additionally, age <65 years, male gender, obesity, fibromyalgia, smoking, alcohol abuse, and history of anxiety or depression were independently associated with increased odds of revision TKA within 2 years after index TKA (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Incidence of LOA after primary TKA is low, with younger age being the strongest predictor for requiring LOA. Patients who undergo LOA for arthrofibrosis within 1 year after primary TKA have a substantially high risk for subsequent early revision TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective Cohort Study.

A Current Prosthesis With a 1-mm Thickness Increment for Polyethylene Insert Could Result in Fewer Adjustments of Posterior Tibial Slope in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

To compare posterior tibial slope (PTS) and incidence of excessive PTS between cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with the current prosthesis, providing a 1-mm increment of polyethylene insert thickness, and its predecessor, providing a 2-mm increment.

METHODS

Each of 154 CR TKAs with Persona (current group) and NexGen (predecessor group) prostheses with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative demographics, including age, sex, and body mass index, were similar. Factors affecting the flexion gap were matched in terms of preoperative range of motion, mechanical axis, PTS, preoperative and postoperative posterior femoral offset (PFO), and PFO ratio. The PTS was evaluated radiographically. The incidence of excessive PTS (PTS > 10°) and the frequency of intraoperative PTS-increasing procedures were investigated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative range of motion, mechanical axis, PFO, and PFO ratios between the 2 groups. The preoperative PTS was not significantly different, but the postoperative PTS was significantly lower in the current group (4.6° vs 6.2°, P < .001). There was no case of excessive PTS in the current group, but there were 9 cases (5.8%) in the predecessor group (P = .030). The intraoperative PTS-increasing procedure was performed more frequently in the predecessor group (12.3% vs 21.4%, P = .047).

CONCLUSION

The current prosthesis providing a 1-mm increment of polyethylene insert thickness could decrease the PTS and the occurrence of excessive PTS in CR TKA. The target angle for PTS can be decreased in TKA using the current prosthesis in comparison with its predecessor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Web-Based Self-Directed Exercise Program Is Cost-Effective Compared to Formal Physical Therapy After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Web-based physical therapy (WBPT) is a potential means to reduce costs following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although outcomes data support the use of self-directed therapy after TKA, there is a paucity of literature evaluating its cost-effectiveness. This study aimed to determine utilization trends of either outpatient physical therapy (OPPT) or WBPT after TKA, assess the outcomes of patients based on their use of WBPT, OPPT, or both, and evaluate OPPT costs based on the amount of WBPT used.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 701 patients (731 TKAs) was performed. Patients were given a prescription for OPPT and access to a self-directed WBPT program. Functional scores were obtained preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively, and the rate of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), range of motion, and PT costs were recorded.

RESULTS

About 49.8% of patients utilized WBPT, 34.7% of patients utilized WBPT and OPPT, and 23% of patients utilized neither source of therapy. Patients that utilized both WBPT and OPPT demonstrated the lowest rates of MUA. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes based on the number of WBPT logins. Overall, PT cost was 3.4× higher for those that underwent MUA. Subgroup analysis of patients that utilized WBPT revealed that the cost and number of PT visits decreased as the number of logins increased. Patients younger than 65 utilized more WBPT and OPPT while demonstrating worse outcomes (lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement postoperative scores and more MUAs).

CONCLUSION

WBPT can be an effective option to offset costs associated with OPPT, without compromising outcomes.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee: Who Still Requires a Revision Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a multifactorial complication involving patient, implant, surgical technique, and rehabilitation, occasionally necessitating manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) or revision. Few modern databases contain sufficient longitudinal information of all factors. We characterized MUA after primary TKA and identified independent risk factors for revision TKA after MUA from the American Joint Replacement Registry.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed primary TKAs for American Joint Replacement Registry patients ≥65 years from January 1, 2012 to 31 March, 2019. We linked these to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database to identify MUA and revision TKA procedure codes. We compared groups with chi-squared testing, identifying independent risk factors for subsequent revision with binary logistic regression presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of 664,604 primary TKAs, 3918 (0.6%) underwent MUA after a median of 2.0 ± 1.0 months. Revision surgery occurred in 131 (3.4%) MUA patients after a median of 9.0 months. Timing of MUA was not different between revision and no revision patients (P = .09). Patients undergoing MUA compared to no MUA were older (age 71.5 vs 70.7, P < .01), predominantly female (63.9% vs 61.2%, P < .01), current/former tobacco users (24.2% vs 13.3%, P < .01), with osteoarthritis diagnoses (98.0% vs 84.3%, P < .01). Independent risk factors for revision after MUA were male gender (1.56, 1.09-2.22).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of MUA after primary TKA is low (0.6%) in Medicare patients ≥65 years of age; 3.4% progress to revision after a median of 9 months. Being male was significantly associated with revision TKA after MUA.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia With Lysis of Adhesions Is Effective in Arthrofibrosis After Sulcus-Deepening Trochleoplasty: A Prospective Study

Background

Sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty has been established as an effective treatment for patellar instability due to trochlear dysplasia. However, arthrofibrosis is a known complication following trochleoplasty, which may require manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) with or without lysis of adhesions (LOA) to increase the knee range of motion (ROM), especially flexion.

Purpose

To prospectively follow patients for ROM improvements and subsequent complications after undergoing MUA with or without LOA in the setting of sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A total of 76 knees with severe trochlear dysplasia were prospectively enrolled and underwent sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty, with a mean (±SD) follow-up of 32.5 ± 19.3 months. Concomitant procedures included medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, lateral retinacular release, and tibial tubercle osteotomy. Physical examination including ROM and findings of recurrent patellar instability were collected for all patients. Arthrofibrosis was defined as active and passive flexion less than 90° within 3 months of surgery combined with a plateau in progress with physical therapy. Paired-samples and independent-samples t tests were used. A P value less than .05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 62 knees met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Of these patients, 11 experienced arthrofibrosis as a complication and underwent MUA within 3 months of their index procedure. Of these 11 patients, 9 subsequently underwent arthroscopic LOA following MUA because acceptable ROM could not be achieved with manipulation alone. Patients with arthrofibrosis had a premanipulation mean ROM that was significantly different from those without arthrofibrosis (77.3° ±18.6° vs 133.3° ± 12.7°, respectively; P < .001). In the arthrofibrotic group, postoperative ROM increased significantly after MUA and/or LOA compared with the preoperative ROM (127.3° ± 12.5° vs 77.3° ± 18.6°, respectively; P < .001). ROM in the arthrofibrotic group after MUA/LOA was not significantly different from that in the nonarthrofibrotic group (flexion, 127.3° ± 12.5° vs 133.3° ± 12.7°, respectively; P = .156). No complications from the MUA or LOA were reported at subsequent follow-up visits.

Conclusion

When indicated in the setting of severe trochlear dysplasia, sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty is a treatment for disabling recurrent patellar instability with a known complication of arthrofibrosis. Initiation of postoperative physical therapy within 3 days of surgery may reduce the incidence of arthrofibrosis. If arthrofibrosis is encountered after a sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty, MUA without LOA is not as effective as when following other procedures of the knee, whereas MUA with LOA is an effective procedure likely to result in ROM and patient outcome scores similar to those of a nonarthrofibrotic knee after the same procedure. Both MUA and LOA appear to be safe based on the limited number of patients in this study without complication.