Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

The association between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with stratification based on measurement method and implant design.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed using PRISMA-P guidelines. PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Trials, and Embase were queried for articles evaluating the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes inclusive of range of motion (ROM), strength, outcome scores, and pertinent complications (acromial and scapular spine fractures, nerve injury) after RSA. The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was reported descriptively overall and stratified by measurement method and implant design (globally medialized vs. lateralized). A positive association was defined as increased humeral lengthening being associated with greater ROM, outcome scores, or a greater incidence of complications, whereas a negative association denoted that increased humeral lengthening was associated with poorer ROM, outcome scores, or a lower incidence of complications. Meta-analysis was performed to compare humeral lengthening between patients with and without fractures of the acromion or scapular spine.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included. Humeral lengthening was assessed as the acromiohumeral distance (AHD), the distance from the acromion to the greater tuberosity (AGT), the acromion to the deltoid tuberosity (ADT), and the acromion to the distal humerus (ADH). Of 11 studies that assessed forward elevation, a positive association with humeral lengthening was found in 6, a negative association was found in 1, and 4 studies reported no association. Of studies assessing internal rotation (n = 9), external rotation (n = 7), and abduction (n = 4), all either identified a positive or lack of association with humeral lengthening. Studies assessing outcome scores (n = 11) found either a positive (n = 5) or no (n = 6) association with humeral lengthening. Of the studies that assessed fractures of the acromion and/or scapular spine (n = 6), 2 identified a positive association with humeral lengthening, 1 identified a negative association, and 3 identified no association. The single study that assessed the incidence of nerve injury identified a positive association with humeral lengthening. Meta-analysis was possible for AGT (n = 2) and AHD (n = 2); greater humeral lengthening was found in patients with fractures for studies using the AGT (mean difference 4.5 mm, 95% CI 0.7-8.3) but not the AHD. Limited study inclusion and heterogeneity prohibited identification of trends based on method of measuring humeral lengthening and implant design.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after RSA remains unclear and requires future investigation using a standardized assessment method.

Role of Fibular Allograft in Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the outcomes and complication rates of fibular allografts (FA) as an augmentation technique for proximal humeral fractures and determine their appropriate indications.

DATA SOURCES

English- and Spanish-language articles in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Google Scholar databases were systematically reviewed with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines on April 10, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies of patients with proximal humeral fractures treated primarily with FA and locking compression plates and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included, and presenting results with standardized clinical scales, radiological values, and operative complications.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently extracted data from the selected studies with a standardized data collection form. Subsequently, each extracted data set was consolidated on the agreement of authors.

DATA SYNTHESIS

From the initial screening of 361 articles, 5 case series and 6 retrospective cohort studies were included. A meta-analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

FA improved the clinical and radiological results, thereby reducing complications. The optimal indication for this procedure may be a 4-part fracture with medial column disruption in younger adults.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management options for proximal humerus fractures - A systematic review & network meta-analysis of randomized control trials

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to systematically review the randomized controlled trials on the various treatment options that can be utilized in the management of displaced proximal humerus fractures.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Based on the PRISMA guidelines, three independent reviewers performed a systematic review of the literature. Randomized control trials (RCTs) focusing on the outcomes of the following interventions in the management of PHFs were considered for inclusion; (1) non-operative or conservative (NOC) management, (2) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), (3) intra-medullary nailing (IMN), (4) shoulder hemi-arthroplasty (HA), and (5) reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Network meta-analyses were performed using R and studies were ranked according to their P-score.

RESULTS

Our study included 13 RCTs. RSA had improvements in abduction, constant score, flexion, as well as lowest rates of malunion and osteonecrosis when compared to other management modalities (P-Score = 0.9786, P-Score = 0.9998, P-Score = 0.9909, P-Score = 0.9590 and P-Score = 0.8042 respectively). HA was found to have improvements in health-related quality of life scores when compared to other management modalities (P-Score = 0.9672). ORIF had the highest improvement in quick disability of arm, shoulder and hand scores and visual analogue scale scores (P-Score = 0.8209 and P-Score = 0.7155 respectively). NOC was found to have the lowest rate of conversion to surgical intervention, with RSA having the lowest rate of surgical interventions (P-Score = 0.9186 and P-Score = 0.7497 respectively).

DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION

RSA offers satisfactory improvements in clinical and functional outcomes when compared to other non-operative and operative treatment options in the management of carefully selected proximal humerus fractures, with a minimal revision rate when compared to other surgical management modalities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I - Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Introduction

The reverse shoulder arthroplasty is nowadays a treatment option for a variety of shoulder problems. As its incidence rose, also the number of complications increased, including intraoperative fractures.

Significance

We performed a systematic review and critical analysis of the current literature following the PRISMA guidelines. Our purpose was to: 1) determine incidence, causes, and characteristics of intraoperative fractures; 2) evaluate their current treatment options, possible related complications, reoperation rates, and the patients’ outcome; and 3) determine the overall incidence of each complication related to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The articles were selected from PubMed medical database in April 2020 using a comprehensive search strategy. Rayyan software was used to support the selection process of the records. A descriptive and critical analysis of the results was performed.

Results

The study group included a total of 13,513 reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The total number of complications was 1647 (rate 12.1%). The most common complication was dislocation (340 cases, rate 2.5%). Forty-six studies reported a total of 188 intraoperative fractures among the complications (rate 1.4%). The intraoperative fracture rate was 2.9% and 13.6% in primary and revision settings, respectively. There were 136 humeral fractures, 60% of them occurred in revision RSAs, during the removal of the previous implant, and involved the shaft in the majority of cases (39%). Glenoid fractures were 51 and occurred mostly during the reaming of the glenoid. We observed 7 further related complications (rate of 4%) and 3 reoperations (rate of 1.5%). The outcome was satisfactory in the majority of cases.

Conclusions

A comprehensive review on intraoperative fractures in reverse shoulder arthroplasties is presented. Results suggest favorable outcomes for all treatment methods, with a modest further complication rate. This investigation may aid in the treatment decision-making for these complications.

Prevention and Treatment of Nerve Injuries in Shoulder Arthroplasty

➤

Nerve injuries during shoulder arthroplasty have traditionally been considered rare events, but recent electrodiagnostic studies have shown that intraoperative nerve trauma is relatively common.

➤

The brachial plexus and axillary and suprascapular nerves are the most commonly injured neurologic structures, with the radial and musculocutaneous nerves being less common sites of injury.

➤

Specific measures taken during the surgical approach, component implantation, and revision surgery may help to prevent direct nerve injury. Intraoperative positioning maneuvers and arm lengthening warrant consideration to minimize indirect injuries.

➤

Suspected nerve injuries should be investigated with electromyography preferably at 6 weeks and no later than 3 months postoperatively, allowing for primary reconstruction within 3 to 6 months of injury when indicated. Primary reconstructive options include neurolysis, direct nerve repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfers.

➤

Secondary reconstruction is preferred for injuries presenting >12 months after surgery. Secondary reconstructive options with favorable outcomes include tendon transfers and free functioning muscle transfers.

Complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a concise review

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an ideal treatment for glenohumeral dysfunction due to cuff tear arthropathy. As the number of patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing, the incidence of complications after this procedure also is increasing. The rate of complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty was reported to be 15%-24%. Recently, the following complications have been reported in order of frequency: periprosthetic infection, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, neurologic injury, scapular notching, acromion or scapular spine fracture, and aseptic loosening of prosthesis. However, the overall complication rate has varied across studies because of different prosthesis used, improvement of implant and surgical skills, and different definitions of complications. Some authors included complications that affect the clinical outcomes of the surgery, while others reported minor complications that do not affect the clinical outcomes such as minor reversible neurologic deficit or minimal scapular notching. This review article summarizes the processes related to diagnosis and treatment of complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the aim of helping clinicians reduce complications and perform appropriate procedures if/when complications occur.

Limited improvement and high rate of complication in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for previous native shoulder infection

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) surgery for the sequelae of former septic native joint shoulder arthritis are unknown but might be inferior to patients without prior bacterial arthritis.

METHODS

We performed a single-center case-control study embedded in our prospective RTSA cohort. We matched all patients with prior infections in a 1:1 ratio with patients who underwent RTSA for other indications. The matching variables were indication for surgery, age, sex, dominant/nondominant shoulder, and body mass index. We evaluated outcomes by Constant score and active function.

RESULTS

Among 1249 patients in the RTSA cohort, 14 were operated for sequelae of previous native shoulder joint infections. Although both groups significantly improved from preoperative to postoperative values, the outcome of postinfectious patients was clearly inferior in comparison with the control group (absolute [38 ± 17 vs. 75 ± 8, P < .01], relative Constant score [47 ± 19 vs. 88 ± 9, P < .01], Constant pain score [11.0 ± 3.1 vs. 14.3 ± 1.3, P < .01], subjective shoulder value [43 ± 26 vs. 85 ± 10, P < .01], abduction [70 ± 43 vs. 148 ± 29°, P = .001], and elevation [82 ± 49° to 131 ± 16°, P = .02]). Moreover, in the postinfectious group, overall surgical complications occurred in 36%, with the need for revision in 21%. There was, however, no recurrence of infection in any of the patients' shoulders.

CONCLUSION

RTSA for end-stage postinfectious joint disease is associated with a high number of complications and reoperations. Clinical outcomes are inferior to those without past infection.

Open reduction and internal fixation of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures by intrafocal distraction: a clinical and radiographic study of thirty-two cases with five to ten years of follow-up

PURPOSE

The disadvantage of ORIF of proximal humerus fracture (PHF) by intrafocal distraction is that once the device is inserted, it cannot be removed. This study was designed to evaluate the tolerance of such a titanium alloy device at five years of minimal follow-up (FU) and secondarily to assess the relevance of the osteosynthesis of these fractures.

METHOD

Thirty-two patients operated for PHF and implanted with a titanium alloy device between 2009 and 2011 were reviewed: fifteen three-part fracture (3-PF) with mean age 65.2 ± seven years and mean FU at 86 months, and seventeen four-part (4-PF) with mean age 62.9 ± 12 years and mean FU at 88 months.

RESULTS

There were no signs of clinical or radiological incompatibility to the metal. The lateral cortex of the humeral shaft at the wedge component level of the device was thinner than pre-operatively in half of the cases. For the fifteen 3-PF, the median raw and weighted constant score (CS) were 75 and 100, respectively. Only one case presented avascular necrosis (AVN). For the seventeen 4-PF, the median raw and weighted CS were 64 and 88, respectively. Seven cases presented AVN and none of them seven had initially a dorsomedial metaphyseal extension of the humeral head. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, with 95% confidence interval, was calculated at 89.7% (79.7-100%) survivorship at 7.18 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows no incompatibility of the titanium alloy device, radiological signs of localized stress shielding in half of the cases with no functional impact, excellent clinical and radiological evolution of the 3-PF, and AVN in all 4-PF without dorsomedial metaphyseal extension of the humeral head whereas most of cases without AVN had dorsomedial metaphyseal extension.

Does having prior rotator cuff repair affect outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study compares outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with prior rotator cuff repair to matched control patients without prior surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All primary RTSAs with prior surgery were retrospectively identified from a prospective research database between 2000 and 2014. RTSA patients with prior open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and minimum 2-year follow-up, with age- and sex-matched controls, were identified. Active range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes were evaluated. Preoperative, postoperative, and improvement in outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty RTSA patients were included, with 75 patients in each group (42 female, 33 male). Mean age of the RTSA group with prior rotator cuff repair was 69.6years (average follow-up: 3.8years) compared to the RTSA group without prior surgery (control) aged 70.0years (average follow-up: 3.3years). Preoperatively and postoperatively, RTSA patients with prior cuff repair had slightly worse overhead ROM and outcome scores compared to controls but none were statistically different. The RTSA and control groups had similar and significant improvements in all postoperative ROM and outcome scores. Complications were similar between groups.

DISCUSSION

RTSA patients with prior rotator cuff repair had similar ROM, functional outcome scores, and complications compared to a matched control group without prior surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, treatment study.

Reverse shoulder replacement: a day-case procedure

Background and hypothesis

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an increasingly popular treatment modality for glenohumeral joint arthritis in association with rotator cuff arthropathy. A prolonged hospital stay following joint arthroplasty risks increased complications for patients plus financial implications for institutions. We hypothesized that RSA could be safely and effectively carried out as an outpatient procedure with reduced risks to patients and institutional costs.

Methods

Patients attending our institution for RSA during March 2015 to August 2018 were reviewed preoperatively for consideration for RSA as an outpatient procedure. The inclusion criteria were arthritis of the shoulder having failed conservative management, age older than 50 years, and intact deltoid muscle function. Patients were excluded if they underwent RSA for trauma or for revision following previous total shoulder replacement or hemiarthroplasty. Overall health, social circumstances, and individual wishes were considered.

Results

A total of 21 patients underwent RSA as an outpatient procedure. The mean age was 74 years (range, 59-84 years). There were 8 male and 13 female patients. No overnight stays were required in patients in whom outpatient surgery was planned. The Oxford Shoulder Score increased from a mean of 16 (range, 4-30) preoperatively to a mean of 31 (range, 7-35) at 6 months postoperatively; it was a mean of 36 (range, 7-48) at 12 months postoperatively. Of the patients, 88% were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the service and 81% would undergo the surgical procedure again as a day-case procedure.

Conclusion

RSA as an outpatient procedure can be carried out effectively with high patient satisfaction rates in carefully selected patients.