1
|
Rohde MS, Shea KG, Dawson T, Heyworth BE, Milewski MD, Edmonds EW, Adsit E, Wilson PL, Albright J, Algan S, Beck J, Bowen R, Brey J, Cardelia M, Clark C, Crepeau A, Edmonds EW, Ellington M, Ellis HB, Fabricant P, Frank J, Ganley T, Green D, Gupta A, Heyworth BE, Latz K, Mansour A, Mayer S, McKay S, Milewski M, Niu E, Pacicca D, Parikh S, Rhodes J, Saper M, Schmale G, Schmitz M, Shea K, Storer S, Wilson PL, Ellis HB. Age, Sex, and BMI Differences Related to Repairable Meniscal Tears in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:389-397. [PMID: 36629442 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221145939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of meniscus tears and ACL tears in pediatric patients continues to rise, bringing to question the risk factors associated with these injuries. As meniscus tears are commonly repaired in pediatric populations, the epidemiology of repairable meniscus tears is an important for consideration for surgeons evaluating treatment options. PURPOSE To describe meniscal tear patterns in pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent meniscal repair across multiple institutions and surgeons, as well as to evaluate the relationship between age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) and their effect on the prevalence, type, and displacement of repaired pediatric meniscal tears. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS Data within a prospective multicenter cohort registry for quality improvement, Sport Cohort Outcome Registry (SCORE), were reviewed to describe repaired meniscal tear patterns. All consecutive arthroscopic meniscal repairs from participating surgeons in patients aged <19 years were analyzed. Tear pattern, location, and displacement were evaluated by patient age, sex, and BMI. A subanalysis was also performed to investigate whether meniscal tear patterns differed between those occurring in isolation or those occurring with a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Analysis of variance was used to generate a multivariate analysis of specified variables. Sex, age, and BMI results were compared across the cohort. RESULTS There were 1185 total meniscal repairs evaluated in as many patients, which included 656 (55.4%) male and 529 (44.6%) female patients. Patients underwent surgery at a mean age of 15.3 years (range, 5-19 years), with a mean BMI of 24.9 (range, 12.3-46.42). Of the 1185 patients, 816 (68.9%) had ACL + meniscal repair and 369 (31.1%) had isolated meniscal repair. The male patients underwent more lateral tear repairs than the female patients (54.3% to 40.9%; P < .001) and had a lower incidence of medial tear repair (32.1% vs 41.4%; P < .001). Patients with repaired lateral tears had a mean age of 15.0 years, compared with a mean age of 15.4 years for patients with repaired medial or bilateral tears (P = .001). Higher BMI was associated with "complex" and "radial" tear repairs of the lateral meniscus (P < .001) but was variable with regard to medial tear repairs. CONCLUSION In pediatric and adolescent populations, the data suggest that the surgical team treating knees with potential meniscal injury should be prepared to encounter more complex meniscal tears, commonly indicated in those with higher BMI, while higher rates of lateral meniscal tears were seen in male and younger patients. Future studies should analyze correlates for meniscal repair survival and outcomes in this pediatric cohort undergoing knee surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Rohde
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kevin G Shea
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Timothy Dawson
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Benton E Heyworth
- Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew D Milewski
- Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric W Edmonds
- Rady Children's Hospital, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Philip L Wilson
- Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, Texas, USA; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Jay Albright
- Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Orthopedics, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sheila Algan
- Oklahoma Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jennifer Beck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Orthopedic Institute for Children's Center for Sports Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Richard Bowen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Orthopedic Institute for Children's Center for Sports Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jennifer Brey
- Norton Children's Orthopedics of Louisville, Department of Orthopedics, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Marc Cardelia
- Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - Christian Clark
- OrthoCarolina Pediatric Orthopaedic Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison Crepeau
- Elite Sports Medicine at Connecticut Children's, Hartford, Connecticut, USA; UConn Health, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Eric W Edmonds
- Rady Children's Hospital, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Matt Ellington
- Central Texas Pediatric Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, Austin, Texas, USA; Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Henry B Ellis
- Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, Texas, USA; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Peter Fabricant
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeremy Frank
- Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Division of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Spinal Deformities, Hollywood, Florida, USA
| | - Ted Ganley
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Sports Medicine and Performance Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dan Green
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Gupta
- Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Division of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Spinal Deformities, Hollywood, Florida, USA
| | - Benton E Heyworth
- Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin Latz
- Children's Mercy, Department of Orthopedics-Sports Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Alfred Mansour
- UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephanie Mayer
- Children's Hospital of Colorado, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Scott McKay
- Texas Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matt Milewski
- Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emily Niu
- Children's National Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Donna Pacicca
- Children's Mercy, Department of Orthopedics-Sports Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Shital Parikh
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jason Rhodes
- Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Orthopedics, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael Saper
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Greg Schmale
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Matthew Schmitz
- San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Kevin Shea
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Stephen Storer
- Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Division of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Spinal Deformities, Hollywood, Florida, USA
| | - Philip L Wilson
- Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, Texas, USA; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Henry B Ellis
- Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, Texas, USA; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Investigation performed at Scottish Rite for Children, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rahardja R, Love H, Clatworthy MG, Monk AP, Young SW. Suspensory Versus Interference Tibial Fixation of Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:904-911. [PMID: 35048720 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211070291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The hamstring tendon is frequently used to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), but there is a lack of consensus on the optimal method of fixation. Registry studies have shown that the type of femoral fixation device can influence the risk of revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR), but it is unclear whether the type of tibial fixation has an effect. In New Zealand, over 95% of hamstring tendon grafts are fixed with an adjustable loop suspensory device on the femoral side, with variable usage between suspensory and interference devices, with or without a sheath, on the tibial side. PURPOSE To investigate the association between the type of tibial fixation device and the risk of revision ACLR. STUDY DESIGN Cohort Study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS Prospective data recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry were analyzed. Only primary ACLRs performed with a hamstring tendon autograft fixed with a suspensory device on the femoral side were included. A Cox regression survival analysis with adjustment for patient factors was performed to analyze the effects of the type of tibial fixation device, the number of graft strands, and graft diameter on the risk of revision. RESULTS A total of 6145 primary ACLRs performed between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed. A total of 59.6% of hamstring tendon autografts were fixed with a suspensory device on the tibial side (n = 3662), 17.6% with an interference screw with a sheath (n = 1079), and 22.8% with an interference screw without a sheath (n = 1404). When compared with suspensory devices, a higher revision risk was observed when using an interference screw with a sheath (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.05; P = .009) and without a sheath (adjusted HR, 1.81; P = .044). The number of graft strands and a graft diameter of ≥8 mm were associated with the rate of revision on the univariate analysis; however, after adjusting for confounding variables on the multivariate analysis, they did not significantly influence the risk of revision. CONCLUSION In this study of hamstring tendon autografts fixed with an adjustable loop suspensory device on the femoral side during primary ACLR, the use of an interference screw, with or without a sheath, on the tibial side resulted in a higher revision rate when compared with a suspensory device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Rahardja
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Mark G Clatworthy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrew P Monk
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simon W Young
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hansson F, Moström EB, Forssblad M, Stålman A, Janarv PM. Long-term evaluation of pediatric ACL reconstruction: high risk of further surgery but a restrictive postoperative management was related to a lower revision rate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142:1951-1961. [PMID: 34459955 PMCID: PMC9296415 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04135-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The guidelines regarding rehabilitation after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are sparse. The aim of the study was to retrospectively describe the long-term outcome regarding further surgery and with special emphasis on the revision rate after two different postoperative rehabilitation programs following pediatric ACLR. MATERIAL AND METHODS 193 consecutive patients < 15 years of age who had undergone ACLR at two centers, A (n = 116) and B (n = 77), in 2006-2010 were identified. Postoperative rehabilitation protocol at A: a brace locked in 30° of flexion with partial weight bearing for 3 weeks followed by another 3 weeks in the brace with limited range of motion 10°-90° and full weight bearing; return to sports after a minimum of 9 months. B: immediate free range of motion and weight bearing as tolerated; return to sports after a minimum of 6 months. The mean follow-up time was 6.9 (range 5-9) years. The mean age at ACLR was 13.2 years (range 7-14) years. The primary outcome measurement in the statistical analysis was the occurrence of revision. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate five potential risk factors: surgical center, sex, age at ACLR, time from injury to ACLR and graft diameter. RESULTS Thirty-three percent had further surgery in the operated knee including a revision rate of 12%. Twelve percent underwent ACLR in the contralateral knee. The only significant variable in the statistical analysis according to the multivariable logistic regression analysis was surgical center (p = 0.019). Eight percent of the patients at center A and 19% of the patients at B underwent ACL revision. CONCLUSIONS Further surgery in the operated knee could be expected in one third of the cases including a revision rate of 12%. The study also disclosed a similar rate of contralateral ACLR at 12%. The revision rate following pediatric ACLR was lower in a center which applied a more restrictive rehabilitation protocol. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Case-control study, Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frida Hansson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Capio Artro Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Sophiahemmet Hospital, Valhallavägen 91, 11486, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Eva Bengtsson Moström
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Capio Artro Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Sophiahemmet Hospital, Valhallavägen 91, 11486, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Forssblad
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Stålman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Capio Artro Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Sophiahemmet Hospital, Valhallavägen 91, 11486, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per-Mats Janarv
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Capio Artro Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Sophiahemmet Hospital, Valhallavägen 91, 11486, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Santos ADA, Carneiro-Filho M, e Albuquerque RFDM, de Moura JPFM, Franciozi CE, Luzo MVM. Mechanical evaluation of tibial fixation of the hamstring tendon in anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction with and without interference screws. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2020; 75:e1123. [PMID: 32556055 PMCID: PMC7196727 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare two postero-lateral bundle (PLB) tibial fixation techniques for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with double bundle: a technique without the use of an interference screw, preserving the native tibial insertion of the tendons of the gracilis and semitendineous muscles, and a technique with the use of an interference screw and without preserving the insertion of the tendons. METHODS A comparative study was conducted in cadavers with a universal mechanical test machine. In total, 23 cadaver knees were randomized for tibial fixation of the PLB using the two techniques: Maintaining the tibial insertion of the tendons during reconstruction, without the use of an interference screw (group A, 11 cases); and fixating the graft with an interference screw, without maintaining the insertion of the tendons (group B, 12 cases). A continuous traction was performed (20 mm/min) in the same direction as the produced tunnel, and force (N), elongation (mm), rigidity (N/mm), and tension (N/mm2) were objectively determined in each group. RESULTS Group A exhibited a maximum force (MF) of 315.4±124.7 N; maximum tension of 13.57±3.65 N/mm2; maximum elongation of 19.73±4.76 mm; force at the limit of proportionality (FLP) of 240.6±144.0 N; and an elongation at the limit of proportionality of 14.37±6.58 mm. Group B exhibited a MF of 195.7±71.8 N; maximum tension of 8.8±3.81 N/mm2; maximum elongation of 15.3±10.73 mm; FLP of 150.1±68.7 N; and an elongation at the limit of proportionality of 6.86±2.42 mm. When comparing the two groups, significant differences were observed in the variables of maximum force (p=0.016), maximum tension (p=0.019), maximum elongation (p=0.007), and elongation at the limit of proportionality (p=0.003). CONCLUSION The use of the native insertion of the semitendineous and gracilis tendons, without an additional fixation device, presented mechanical superiority over their fixation with interference screws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anderson de Aquino Santos
- Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
- Corresponding author. E-mail:
| | - Mario Carneiro-Filho
- Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque
- Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | | | - Carlos Eduardo Franciozi
- Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Marcus Vinícius Malheiros Luzo
- Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| |
Collapse
|