Mimickers of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Presenting as Peripheral Nerve Disease: A Case Report

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly population. It is a degenerative disease that classically presents with fine motor dysfunction of the hands and gait instability. These symptoms can easily be masked by old age, complex medical history, and more benign diseases. We describe the case of a 67-year-old male who was referred to orthopedic surgery for bilateral hand numbness and weakness attributed to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The patient had trouble ambulating, rhythmic clonus in his ankles, and a bilateral positive Hoffman sign resulting in a referral to neurosurgery for an emergent spinal cord decompression. To our knowledge, few case reports exist demonstrating how cervical myelopathy can mimic more benign peripheral nerve diseases such as CTS. We describe how difficult early recognition can be, as well as the importance of primary care doctors maintaining a high degree of suspicion for a disease that has nonspecific examination findings and can easily mimic more benign processes.

Management of Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Purpose

This review aims to compare recovery outcomes of conservative, early operative, and a combination of conservative and operative management for acute carpal tunnel syndrome (ACTS).

Methods

A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL from 1970 to 2022 was conducted using the keywords carpal tunnel syndrome and acute nerve compression. ACTS was defined as a case within 12 weeks of symptom onset. Primary data extracted included causes (traumatic or atraumatic), symptom duration (<1 day, 1-7 days, or 8-84 days), intervention (surgical, conservative, or conservative then surgical), follow-up duration, and outcome (full recovery or non-full recovery). Logistic regression analyses and χ2 tests were performed to investigate associations among these variables.

Results

A total of 197 patients involving 127 (64.5%) traumatic and 70 (35.3%) atraumatic cases were included. Forty-seven percent of patients were managed conservatively followed by surgery, 30% conservative only, and 23% surgery only. The traumatic group was associated with better recovery than the atraumatic group. Recovery outcomes were not associated with symptom duration or follow-up time. The choice of intervention was not associated with traumatic or atraumatic etiology, nor did it affect recovery outcomes in either group.

Conclusions

Traumatic ACTS is associated with better recovery outcomes than atraumatic etiologies. Surgical intervention was not found to be associated with better outcomes than conservative management, regardless of the etiologies. Further prospective studies are warranted to compare surgical versus conservative management.

Clinical Relevance

Currently, there are no guidelines for the best management of ACTS, and it is not known if early or delayed surgical treatment is optimal. This review compiles the current evidence and identifies gaps in the literature, highlighting the need for further investigation to provide the best clinical practice.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: As Seen from the Perspective of the Patient

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve compression syndrome in the upper extremity and is one of the most common problems treated by hand surgeons. Despite its ubiquity-or perhaps because of it-there is a lack of unanimity regarding how best to treat CTS and what the options for treatment are. This study aimed to explore what patients find important when deciding on treatment of CTS in an effort to improve the physician-patient shared decision-making process.

Methods

An online crowdsourcing platform was used to recruit participants for this study. Study participants were first led through a clinical scenario in which the symptoms of CTS were explained. They were then asked a series of questions regarding what was important to them when deciding upon treatment. A Likert scale was used for responses.

Results

In total, 268 participant responses were included in the study. A majority of patients responded that all surveyed factors were either very important or important when considering treatment. The risk of surgery was most important, whereas postoperative pain was least important. The risk of surgery was significantly more important to patients than postoperative pain and time out of work. The cost of surgery was significantly more important to patients than postoperative pain.

Conclusions

Given the lack of consensus regarding an algorithm for the treatment of CTS, the patient's preference is increasingly important when formulating a treatment plan. The results of this study may better help physicians frame the discussion of treatment options for CTS with their patients.

Residual Symptoms After Carpal Tunnel Decompression and Treatment With Gabapentin: A Multicenter Study

Objectives

To identify postoperative residual symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to investigate the effectiveness of gabapentin in the treatment of residual symptoms.

Materials and methods

Of a total of 412 patients who underwent surgery for CTS in four centers over a four-year period, 14 who had residual symptoms after CTS release and did not receive gabapentin (Group A) and 14 patients with postoperative residual symptoms and received gabapentin were included in this retrospective study. Postoperative residual symptoms were defined as persistent nocturnal numbness and tingling with or without occasional daytime pain. Tinel’s and Phalen’s tests were performed for the diagnosis of residual symptoms. Functional Severity Score (FSS), Symptom Severity Score (SSS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate functional outcomes, severity of symptoms, and numbness and sleep quality, respectively at six and 12 weeks postoperatively.

Level of Evidence: III, therapeutic study

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean postoperative FSS (p=0.845) and VAS-numbness scores (p=0.367) between the groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean postoperative SSS (p=0.025) and VAS-sleep quality scores (p<0.001) between the groups.

Conclusion

Gabapentin treatment can be a treatment of choice for residual symptoms after CTS surgery and clinical improvement can be achieved owing to its relieving effect, particularly in nocturnal symptoms of patients having neuropathic pain.

The Myth of Median Nerve in Forearm and Its Role in Double Crush Syndrome: A Cadaveric Study

Purpose: This study aims to histologically compare the median nerve in the arm, forearm, and wrist, to help understand how cervical radiculopathy in a double crush phenomenon causes distal nerve dysfunction at the carpal tunnel and median nerve with concurrent absence of symptoms at the forearm.

Methods: The study was performed on 12 fresh cadaveric upper limbs free from any injury or operation. Male cadavers in the age range of 35–40 years were used. The dissection of the median nerve and the histological examination of the specimens from the arm, forearm, and wrist were conducted to evaluate variations in the epineurium thickness (μm), perineurium thickness (μm), number of fascicles per nerve trunk, area percent of myelin covering, and area percent of neurolemmal sheath.

Results: Morphometric and statistical results of the cadaveric median nerve trunk revealed that the mean epineurium and perineurium thickness measured in H&E-stained sections in the forearm were significantly greater than those in the arm and wrist specimens. Further, the mean percent area of the myelin covering in the forearm was significantly lower than that in the arm and wrist specimens in the sections stained with osmium oxide (p < 0.001). There were, however, no significant differences in the neurolemmal sheath among the arm, forearm, and wrist specimens in the silver-stained sections.

Conclusion: The histological differences explained the high concomitant occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radiculopathy and the concurrent absence of symptoms at the forearm. Hence, we suggest cautious evaluation of patients with upper limb symptoms, since the management of these conditions requires a different approach.