Acetabular Component Migration Measured Using Radiostereometric Analysis Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review

Does the interface between individual 3D acetabular implants and host bone influence the functional outcomes in patients with severe bone loss after revision surgery?

INTRODUCTION

There is a wide range of commercially produced revision implants for adequate reconstruction of acetabular large bone defects today, however, it is not always possible to achieve long-term survival of these implants. There is an increasing number of scientific publications concerning the use of custom-designed 3D components, which make it possible not only to achieve stable fixation and connect the pelvic bones but also to restore hip joint biomechanics.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the positioning of 3D acetabular implants after revision hip arthroplasty and its impact on clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

we analyzed results in 48 patients with bone defect types IIIA and IIIB Paprosky types, after revision hip arthroplasty. A prospective study was conducted from 2017 to 2023. Revision arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the components was performed in 30 cases and as a second stage of periprosthetic infection treatment in 18 cases.

RESULTS

We did not achieve a statistically significant difference when using additional flanges and clinical and functional results. In 2 cases we faced aseptic loosening in patients using flanges. In no case were we able to install an implant with 100% adherence to porous structure compared to preoperatively planned adherence. According to the WOMAC and VAS scales, increasing the contact area of the components showed a slight statistical difference in the improvement of clinical and functional results and the reduction of pain.

CONCLUSIONS

When acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by more than 68%, we did not register a single complication in the postoperative period, and acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by less than 68%, a total of 8 (16.6%) complications were registered.

Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical models of two frequently used techniques for reconstructing severe acetabular defects with pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) - the Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System (TMARS) and custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) - using virtual modelling.

Methods

Pre- and postoperative CT scans from ten patients who underwent revision with the TMARS for a Paprosky IIIB acetabular defect with pelvic discontinuity were retrospectively collated. Computer models of a CTAC implant were designed from the preoperative CT scans of these patients. Computer models of the TMARS reconstruction were segmented from postoperative CT scans using a semi-automated method. The amount of bone removed, the implant-bone apposition that was achieved, and the restoration of the centre of rotation of the hip were compared between all the actual TMARS and the virtual CTAC implants.

Results

The median amount of bone removed for TMARS reconstructions was significantly greater than for CTAC implants (9.07 cm3 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.86 to 21.42) vs 1.16 cm3 (IQR 0.42 to 3.53) (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the median overall implant-bone apposition between TMARS reconstructions and CTAC implants (54.8 cm2 (IQR 28.2 to 82.3) vs 56.6 cm2 (IQR 40.6 to 69.7) (p = 0.683). However, there was significantly more implant-bone apposition within the residual acetabulum (45.2 cm2 (IQR 28.2 to 72.4) vs 25.5 cm2 (IQR 12.8 to 44.1) (p = 0.001) and conversely significantly less apposition with the outer cortex of the pelvis for TMARS implants compared with CTAC reconstructions (0 cm2 (IQR 0 to 13.1) vs 23.2 cm2 (IQR 16.4 to 30.6) (p = 0.009). The mean centre of rotation of the hip of TMARS reconstructions differed by a mean of 11.1 mm (3 to 28) compared with CTAC implants.

Conclusion

In using TMARS, more bone is removed, thus achieving more implant-bone apposition within the residual acetabular bone. In CTAC implants, the amount of bone removed is minimal, while the implant-bone apposition is more evenly distributed between the residual acetabulum and the outer cortex of the pelvis. The differences suggest that these implants used to treat pelvic discontinuity might achieve short- and long-term stability through different biomechanical mechanisms.

Migration patterns of acetabular cups: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies to investigate the early and long-term migration patterns of acetabular cups and the influence of implant factors on cup migration over time.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify all RSA studies of cup migration following primary total hip replacement (THR). Proximal migration at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were considered for analysis. Implant factors investigated included fixation type, head size, bearing surface, uncemented coating design, and the decade of RSA introduction.

RESULTS

47 studies reported the proximal migration of 83 cohorts (2,328 cups). Besides 1 threaded cup design, no implant factor investigated was found to significantly influence proximal migration. The mean pooled 2-year proximal migration of cemented cups (0.14 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.20) was not significantly different from uncemented cups (0.12 mm, CI 0.04-0.19). The mean pooled proximal migration at 6 months was 0.11 mm (CI 0.06-0.16) and there was no significant increase between 6 months and 2 years (0.015 mm, CI 0.000-0.030). 27 of 75 cohorts (36%) reported mean proximal migration greater than 0.2 mm at 2 years, which has previously been identified as a predictor of implants at risk of long-term loosening.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the majority of cup migration occurs within the first 6 months. With one exception, no implant factors influenced the 2-year proximal migration of acetabular cups. 36% of studies with 2-year migration were considered at risk of long-term loosening. Further investigation and comparison against long-term survivorship data would validate 6-month and/or 1-year proximal migration measurements as an earlier predictor of long-term loosening than the current 2-year threshold.

Custom 3D-Printed Implants for Acetabular Reconstruction: Intermediate-Term Functional and Radiographic Results

The management of massive acetabular defects at the time of revision hip surgery is challenging. Severe pelvic bone loss and the heterogeneity and quality of the remaining bone stock can compromise the fixation and mechanical stability of the implant.

Methods

We reviewed a database of consecutive patients who had undergone acetabular reconstruction with the use of a custom 3D-printed implant with a dual-mobility bearing for the treatment of Paprosky type-3B defects between 2016 and 2019. Functional and radiological outcomes were assessed.

Results

A total of 26 patients (17 women and 9 men) with a minimum follow-up of 36 months (median, 53 months; range, 36 to 77 months) were identified. The median age at surgery was 69 years (range, 49 to 90 years), and 4 patients had pelvic discontinuity. The cumulative implant survivorship was 100%. The median Oxford Hip Score improved significantly from 8 (range, 2 to 21) preoperatively to 32 (range, 14 to 47) postoperatively (p = 0.0001). One patient had a transient sciatic nerve palsy, 1 hip dislocated 6 months postoperatively and was managed nonoperatively, and 1 infection recurred. No patient had a fracture. Radiographic evaluation showed bone ingrowth at the bone-implant interface in 24 patients (92%) at ≥12 months of follow-up and showed no evidence of implant loosening or migration at the latest follow-up (3 to 6 years).

Conclusions

Excellent functional improvement, implant survivorship, and osseointegration were recorded in the patient cohort. Accurate preoperative planning and the adoption of custom 3D-printed implants showed promising results in complex revision hip surgery.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Impact of computed tomography metal artifact reduction protocol on periprosthetic tissue characterization after total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric study

Metal artifact reduction (MAR) has improved computed tomography (CT) imaging of total hip arthroplasty (THA) but the assessment of osteolysis and implant to bone contact relies on the accurate depiction of bone defects, cancellous bone, and cement. This study evaluates the impact of available single and dual-energy protocols on periprosthetic tissue characterization in a cadaveric phantom. Bilateral THA was performed on a fresh frozen cadaveric pelvis with simulated osteolytic cavities. CT acquisitions with projection-based MAR and noise equivalence were performed using single energy 140 kVp, single energy 150 kVp with 0.6 mm tin filtration, and dual-energy at 100/150 kVp with 0.6 mm tin filtration, from which simulated energies were extracted. Image subtraction, segmentation, region of interest histograms, and line profiles were used to characterize tissue density and separation. Tissue densities were heavily dependent on the energy profile of the protocol. Cancellous bone ranged from 182 to 45 HU and cement from 1012 to 131 HU using 140 kVp compared to dual-energy with weighted high energy tube, respectively. Spectral separation between cancellous bone, osteolytic defect, and cement was reduced for all protocols compared with 140 kVp. Spectral overlap was most severe using dual-energy with heavily weighted high-energy tubes. Dual-energy algorithms reduced trabecular contrast within the cancellous bone and cortical edge response. Although the dual-energy acquisition has been proposed as an additive to projection-based MAR techniques in THA, reduced density and contrast in clinically relevant periprosthetic tissue compared to 140 kVp single energy may limit its use in characterizing periprosthetic tissues.

RSA Measurements of Implant Instability in a Paprosky III Pelvic Defect with Discontinuity: A Case Report

CASE

We report a case of acetabular reconstruction for a large defect with pelvic discontinuity that underwent 4 revisions for dislocations over a 3-year period. This allowed assessment of implant stability both on imaging, using measurements on plain radiographs and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) against both ilium and ischium, and direct assessment during each surgery. Only implant stability measured with RSA correlated with intraoperative revision findings.

CONCLUSION

This case underlines the role of RSA in assessing early acetabular implant stability in pelvic discontinuity and the importance of assessing the stability of the implant against both ilium and ischium.