1
|
Fares MY, Boufadel P, Daher M, Koa J, Khanna A, Abboud JA. Anterior Shoulder Instability and Open Procedures: History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes. Clin Orthop Surg 2023; 15:521-533. [PMID: 37529197 PMCID: PMC10375816 DOI: 10.4055/cios23018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The shoulder, being the most mobile joint in the human body, is often susceptible to dislocations and subluxations more so than other joints. As such, shoulder instability constitutes a common complaint among patients worldwide, especially those who are young, participate in contact sports, and have increased innate flexibility in their joints. Management options in the setting of instability vary between conservative and surgical options that aim to mitigate symptoms and allow return of function. Surgical options can be arthroscopic and open, with a general shift among surgeons towards utilizing arthroscopic surgery in the past several decades. Nevertheless, open procedures still play a role in managing shoulder instability patients, especially those with significant bone loss, recurrent instability, coexisting shoulder pathologies, and high risk of failure with arthroscopic surgery. In these clinical settings, open procedures, like the Latarjet procedure, open Bankart repair, glenoid bone augmentation using iliac crest autograft or distal tibial allograft, and salvage options like glenohumeral arthrodesis and arthroplasty may show good clinical outcomes and low recurrence rates. Each of these open procedures possesses its own set of advantages and disadvantages and entails a specific set of indications based on published literature. It is important to cater treatment options to the individual patient in order to optimize outcomes and reduce the risk of complications. Future research on open shoulder stabilization procedures should focus on the long-term outcomes of recently utilized procedures, investigate different graft options for procedures involving bone augmentation, and conduct additional comparative analyses in order to establish concrete surgical management guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Y. Fares
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter Boufadel
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan Koa
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Akshay Khanna
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph A. Abboud
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
James M, Kwong CA, More KD, LeBlanc J, Lo IK, Bois AJ. Bony Apprehension Test for Identifying Bone Loss in Patients With Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Validation Study. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:1520-1528. [PMID: 35357960 PMCID: PMC9069656 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221085673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of bone loss has important implications for the surgical treatment of patients with recurrent shoulder instability. The bony apprehension test (BAT) is a physical examination maneuver that was designed to improve specificity from the anterior apprehension test (AAT) in detecting critical bone loss. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the BAT with the AAT and relocation test based on their abilities to predict critical bone loss. Several well-described criteria were utilized to capture critical (≥25%) and subcritical (≥13.5%) glenoid defects, as well as Hill-Sachs defects (≥19%). The ability of the BAT to predict bipolar bone loss was also assessed, as indicated by engaging Hill-Sachs defects and off-track lesions. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. METHODS The study cohort included patients ≥18 years of age who were scheduled to undergo arthroscopic stabilization for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Notable exclusion criteria included multidirectional shoulder instability, connective tissue disorders, and workers' compensation or litigation cases. Patients underwent physical examination immediately before surgery by the treating surgeon (ie, before the induction of anesthesia). Critical glenoid and humeral bone defects were measured on preoperative computed tomography scans. Hill-Sachs engagement and on- or off-track determination of bone loss were assessed arthroscopically and via computed tomography, respectively. RESULTS A total of 52 patients were included in the study. In cases of subcritical glenoid bone loss (≥13.5%) and critical Hill-Sachs defects (≥19%), the BAT had good and fair specificity (82% and 72%, respectively) but poor sensitivity (40% and 39%). The BAT also had poor sensitivity (0%), specificity (67%), and positive predictive value (0%) for higher percentages of glenoid bone loss (≥25%). When engaging Hill-Sachs lesions were assessed, the BAT had excellent specificity (94%) and positive predictive value (94%) but poor sensitivity (43%) and negative predictive value (44%). Furthermore, the BAT performed poorly at predicting off-track humeral lesions. The AAT demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 0% specificity in detecting all measures of bone loss. CONCLUSION The BAT performed poorly at identifying subcritical and critical bone loss and was not found to have any clinical value. Future work is needed to identify a physical examination test that could complement advanced imaging for preoperative assessment of critical bone loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael James
- Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Cory A. Kwong
- Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Kristie D. More
- Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Justin LeBlanc
- Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Ian K.Y. Lo
- Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Aaron J. Bois
- Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,Aaron J. Bois, MD, MSc, Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada ()
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haratian A, Yensen K, Bell JA, Hasan LK, Shelby T, Yoshida B, Bolia IK, Weber AE, Petrigliano FA. Open Stabilization Procedures of the Shoulder in the Athlete: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Open Access J Sports Med 2021; 12:159-169. [PMID: 34754248 PMCID: PMC8572104 DOI: 10.2147/oajsm.s321883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Shoulder instability is a relatively common injury especially in the young athletic population and its surgical management continues to remain a controversial topic in sports medicine orthopedics. Anterior instability is the most common type encountered and is estimated to have an incidence rate of 0.08 per 1000 person-years in the general population; however, this figure is likely higher in the young athletic population. While in recent practice, arthroscopic surgery has become the new gold standard for management, reported failure rates as high as 26% and high recurrence rates in specific subpopulations such as young men in high collision sports have led to the consideration of alternative open procedures such as open Bankart repair, Latarjet, capsular shift, and glenoid bone grafting. These procedures may be preferred in specific patient subgroups such as young athletes involved in contact sports and those with Hill-Sachs defects and multidirectional instability, with postoperative recurrence rates of instability as low as 10%. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of different open surgical techniques in the management of shoulder instability and summarize patient outcomes including recurrence rates for shoulder instability, return to sport, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, and complications either individually by procedure or in comparison with other techniques, with special focus on their impact in the athletic population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aryan Haratian
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katie Yensen
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Bell
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laith K Hasan
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tara Shelby
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brandon Yoshida
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ioanna K Bolia
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexander E Weber
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Frank A Petrigliano
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cordasco FA, Lin B, Heller M, Asaro LA, Ling D, Calcei JG. Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization in the young athlete: return to sport and revision stabilization rates. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:946-953. [PMID: 31812584 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shoulder instability in young athletes is a complex problem with higher recurrence, higher reoperation, and lower return to sport (RTS) rates after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization compared with adults. METHODS This is a prospective case series of young athletes with anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic stabilization surgery. Primary outcomes were RTS and revision surgery, minimum follow-up was 24 months. Exclusion criteria were more than 3 preoperative episodes of instability, significant bone loss, or primary posterior instability. Demographic data, recurrent instability, revision surgery, sports pre- and postsurgery, patient satisfaction, level of RTS, time to RTS, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were analyzed. RESULTS Sixty-seven athletes met inclusion criteria, 19 females and 48 males, with a mean age of 17.5 years (range, 13-21 years). Fifty-nine (88%) athletes returned to sport at an average of 7.1 months (standard deviation, ±1.8); 50 (75%) returned to the same level or higher. Football and lacrosse were the most common sports. Four of 67 athletes (6%), all male, underwent revision stabilization at 11-36 months for recurrent instability. The overall mean SANE score was 88. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that when the high-risk athlete, 21 years old or younger, is appropriately selected for arthroscopic shoulder stabilization by excluding those with 3 or more preoperative shoulder instability episodes and those with off-track and engaging instability patterns, excellent outcomes can be achieved with low revision surgery rates, high RTS rates, and high patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank A Cordasco
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Brian Lin
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Heller
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lori Ann Asaro
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daphne Ling
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacob G Calcei
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
DeFroda S, Bokshan S, Stern E, Sullivan K, Owens BD. Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: Indications and Outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017; 10:442-451. [PMID: 28971317 PMCID: PMC5685957 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-017-9435-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Arthroscopic Bankart repair is commonly utilized for shoulder stabilization in patients with anterior shoulder instability with minimum glenoid bone loss. The purpose of this review is to provide the indications, surgical technique, complications, and recent outcomes in arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulder instability. RECENT FINDINGS Improvements in arthroscopic techniques have led to better patient outcomes, as well as an improved understanding of the pathoanatomy of instability. More recent studies have shown that one of the potential failures of primary arthroscopic repair may be due to unaddressed bone loss. This underscores the importance of evaluating glenoid bone loss and proper patient selection for this procedure to ensure successful outcome. When indicated, arthroscopic stabilization is the treatment of choice for many surgeons due to its lower morbidity and low overall complication rate. Future work must focus on longer-term outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair, as well as the clinical outcomes of new fixation techniques, augmentation techniques, and the effect of glenoid bone loss in outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven DeFroda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
| | - Steven Bokshan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Evan Stern
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | | | - Brett D Owens
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| |
Collapse
|