Atypical Fractures of the Femur: Evaluation and Treatment

Update on Atypical Femoral Fractures

➤ Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are stress fractures between the lesser trochanter and the metaphyseal flare that are most commonly related to prolonged (3 to 5 years) antiresorptive medication use.➤ An important finding is a visible transverse line in the lateral cortex, known as the "dreaded black line." Complete fractures are transverse and have minimal comminution.➤ Prodromal symptoms including hip, groin, thigh, and knee pain are present in more than one-half of cases and are usually misdiagnosed.➤ Nonoperative treatment for all patients with AFF includes withdrawal of bisphosphonates, assessment for secondary causes of osteoporosis, and optimization of vitamin D and calcium.➤ Incomplete fractures without a visible line can initially be treated nonoperatively with protected weight-bearing.➤ Intramedullary nailing is indicated for complete fractures and incomplete fractures with a visible fracture line. Delayed healing after fixation should be anticipated.➤ Treatment with parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs (teriparatide and abaloparatide) after AFF prevents other fractures in high-risk patients, but the effect on healing of the fracture is unclear.

Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fracture With Severe Bowing Treated by Intramedullary Nail and Corrective Osteotomy

We present the case of an 82-year-old female who had difficulty walking due to right thigh pain caused by incomplete atypical femoral fracture (AFF). The femoral bowing was so severe that intramedullary nail insertion was impossible, so we performed a corrective osteotomy of the femur and inserted the intramedullary nail. Postoperatively, the femoral pain disappeared, and bone fusion was achieved at one year and two months postoperatively. In cases of incomplete AFF with very severe femoral bowing, internal fixation with an intramedullary nail combined with corrective osteotomy of the femur is useful.

Bisphosphonates in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Their Use and Complications

Background

Considerable interest has been expressed in the use of bisphosphonates to treat periprosthetic osteoporosis with the clinical goals of reducing periprosthetic fractures and prolonging implant survival.

Methods

A systematic review was performed with the goal of identifying both basic science and clinical studies related to the risks and benefits of bisphosphonate use in total joint arthroplasty.

Results

Studies have shown that bisphosphonates may increase early bony ingrowth, decrease the postoperative loss of bone mineral density, and increase the longevity of implants by reducing the need for revisions secondary to aseptic loosening. Continuing bisphosphonates for 1 year postoperatively seems to provide the greatest benefit, with only marginal benefit being shown by continuing therapy for up to 2 years. Current data present some concerns for an increased risk of periprosthetic fractures especially in younger patients, and prolonged therapy is not recommended due to the potential risk of atypical femur fractures. Patients should be counseled regarding the risk of side effects of bisphosphonates, including the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw, which is a rare but serious side effect. They should also be counseled on the risk of atypical femur fractures and gastrointestinal intolerance.

Conclusions

Orthopedic surgeons could consider bisphosphonates for up to 1 year postoperatively regardless of the patient’s prior bone mineral density, after discussion regarding the risks and benefits with the patient.

Evaluation and management of atypical femoral fractures: an update of current knowledge

Atypical femoral fractures are often attributed to the use of anti-resorptive medications such as bisphosphonates (BP). Whilst they have proven effects on fragility fracture prevention, clinical and laboratory evidence is evolving linking BP-related suppression of bone remodelling to the development of atypical stress-related sub-trochanteric fractures (Shane et al. in JBMR 29:1-23, 2014; Odvina et al. in JCEM 90:1294-301, 2005; Durchschlag et al. in JBMR 21(10):1581-1590, 2006; Donnelly et al. in JBMR 27:672-678, 2012; Mashiba et al. in Bone 28(5):524-531, 2001; Dell et al. in JBMR 27(12):2544-2550, 2012; Black et al. in Lancet 348:1535-1541, 1996; Black et al. in NEJM 356:1809-1822, 2007; Black et al. in JAMA 296:2927-2938, 2006; Schwartz et al. in JBMR 25:976-82, 2010). Injuries may present asymptomatically or with prodromal thigh pain and most can be successfully managed with cephalomedullary nailing and discontinuation of BP therapy. Such injuries exhibit a prolonged time to fracture union with high rates of non-union and metal-work failure when compared to typical subtrochanteric osteoporotic femoral fractures. Despite emerging literature on AFFs, their management continues to pose a challenge to the orthopaedic and extended multi-disciplinary team. The purpose of this review includes evaluation of the current evidence supporting the management of AFFs, clinical and radiological features associated with their presentation and a review of reported surgical strategies to treat and prevent these devastating injures.

Atypical Femur Fractures: Review of Epidemiology, Relationship to Bisphosphonates, Prevention, and Clinical Management

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are highly effective in treating osteoporosis and reducing hip, vertebral, and other fractures by as much as 50% to 70%. However, since 2006, atypical femur fractures (AFFs) emerged as potential side effects of BPs and other treatments. These fractures have unusual radiologic features and occur with little trauma. Public concern has led to a >50% decrease in BP usage. AFFs are rare: for each AFF, >1200 fractures, including 135 hip fractures, are prevented. Case definition criteria were updated by the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research in 2014. Many epidemiologic studies have been reported, and although methodologically challenging, generally support a BP-AFF association. However, the magnitude of the association between BPs and AFFs is uncertain: estimates of relative risk for AFFs among BP users vs nonusers range from 1 to 65 with a meta-analysis estimate of 1.7. Although mechanistic studies have proposed several hypotheses explaining how BPs might decrease bone strength, AFF pathogenesis remains uncertain and cannot explain the paradox of efficacy of reduction of common fractures while increasing risk for rare fractures at one site. There are several consistent risk factors, including Asian race (in North America), femoral bowing, and glucocorticoid use, whereas others remain unclear. Consensus is emerging about strategies to prevent AFFs in BP users (including drug holidays after 5 years' use in some patients). In conclusion, AFFs can be devastating, but even under the most pessimistic assumptions, the benefit/risk ratio is highly positive for BPs, particularly during 3 to 5 years of use. As understanding of AFFs increases, it is becoming increasingly possible to maximize BP benefits while minimizing AFF risk.

Atypical femoral fractures and current management

With the rapid increase in patients receiving bisphosphonates (BPs) for treating osteoporosis, one of the clinical complications associated with its long-term use is atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). Although the absolute risk for AFFs is low and it was a consensus that AFFs were acceptable compared with the amount of osteoporotic fractures BPs have prevented, epidemiological studies have proved that BPs had a strong association with AFFs and possibly more people were going to suffer from this adverse effect with wide prescriptions of this drug. In addition, AFFs seemed to have impaired ability to heal. Thus, to understand the mechanism(s) behind AFFs is important and desirable for considering preventive measures. This article reviewed the clinical features of AFFs as well as potential underlining pathological characteristics, such as the decreased turnover rate caused by BPs that led to multiple-level alternations, e.g., changes not only at cellular and tissue levels, but also related to changes in bone micro- and macrostructure and organic/inorganic contents, leading to potentially compromised mechanical properties of cortical bone when exposed to prolonged BP therapy. Severely suppressed bone turnover may also be the underlying mechanism for impaired fracture healing in patients with AFFs. The rising concerns about the risk for AFFs in nonosteoporotic patients receiving high-dose BPs to treat cancers were also discussed. Detailed investigation will help develop potential targeted pharmacological treatments such as parathyroid hormone. In addition, potential innovative internal fixation implants were discussed with regard to dynamic and biological fixation for enhancing AFF repair.

Atypical femur fractures in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy: etiology and management

Osteoporosis is a growing problem that is projected to affect more than 50% of American adults by 2020. Bisphosphonate therapy is currently the primary mode of treating osteoporosis in this population. While bisphosphonate therapy has been successful in increasing bone mineral density, data has shown an increased risk of atypical femur fractures with prolonged therapy. Atypical femur fractures are characterized by low-energy or atraumatic injuries that occur in the subtrochanteric region. They originate on the medial cortex, travel transversely, and typically have little or no comminution. Conservative therapy is indicated for patients with incomplete fractures without prodromal symptoms. Patients with incomplete fractures and significant prodromal symptoms or visible fracture line on radiographs, those who have failed conservative management, and those with complete fractures should be treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Evaluation should involve imaging of the contralateral femur. Teriparatide therapy may be considered for patients without contraindications. While the incidence of these fractures is low, it is likely that these rates will increase with the aging population and increased prevalence of patients being treated with bisphosphonate therapy.