Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Acromioclavicular Dislocation

Presurgical perspective and postsurgical evaluation of acromioclavicular joint instability

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations are a common cause of pain in patients of any age. Athletes who participate in contact sports, such as hockey, football, rugby, and soccer, are particularly susceptible to such injuries. The ACJ has an important role in the function of the upper limb, and its complexity of movement makes it susceptible to acute injuries and chronic dysfunction with debilitating effects that must be treated appropriately and promptly to preserve function. Recently, ACJ has received increasing attention due to the development of new surgical techniques for the restoration of normal function and stability. There is some agreement about the treatment of ACJ dislocations, but controversy remains about the treatment of Rockwood grade III dislocations, and a new approach to these injuries is suggested by ISAKOS. Overall, the paper summarizes new concepts in the anatomy of the ACJ and reviews the utility of imaging methods in ACJ dislocations as well as their treatment and complications.

Conservative treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint separation: a randomized controlled trial sling vs. brace

Background

Management of Rockwood III acromioclavicular joint separations is a matter of ongoing debate, with nonoperative treatment being favored in recent literature. The aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of nonoperative treatment with a brace, which elicits a direct reduction force to the distal clavicle, to a sling. We hypothesized the brace might yield in better acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) reduction and cosmesis.

Methods

In this dual center prospective randomized controlled trial, all patients sustaining an acromioclavicular joint separation Rockwood III between July 2017 and August 2020 were included. Patients with previous ipsi- or contralateral ACJ injury or surgery were excluded. Randomization occurred in the emergency department to either the sling or brace group. Patients were followed up at 1, 6, and 12 weeks. Patient-reported outcome measures included subjective shoulder value (SSV) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at each follow-up and Constant Score at 6 and 12 weeks. Vertical distal clavicle displacement was assessed on bilateral non-weighted panoramic anteroposterior radiographs using coracoclavicular (CC) distance to calculate the CC-index.

Results

Thirty-five consecutive patients were included across the 2 sites, 18 (all male) in the brace and 17 (14 male) in the sling group. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups, the average age was 40 years, and body mass index 25.5 kg/m². Analysis revealed no statistical difference in CC-index between groups at the time of injury, 6 weeks and 12 weeks postinjury (P = .39, P = .11, and P = .21). SSV improved from 30 and 35 postinjury to 81 and 84 at 12 weeks in the sling and brace group, respectively (P = .59). ASES improved from 48 and 38 to 82 and 83, respectively (P = .84). Similarly, Constant Score improved from 64 and 67 to 82 and 81, respectively (P = .90). One patient in the brace group underwent ACJ stabilization with hamstring autograft at 4 months due to persistent pain.

Conclusion

This randomized controlled trial shows no statistically significant difference between the brace and sling group in clinical (SSV, ASES, Constant Score) or radiological (CC-index) outcomes after conservative treatment of Rockwood III injuries.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Significantly Displaced Adolescent Posterior Sternoclavicular Joint Injuries

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) scans are the standard imaging modality for the diagnosis and treatment guide for adolescent posterior sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) injuries. However, the medial clavicular physis is not visualized and it is not possible to differentiate between a true SCJ dislocation and a physeal injury (PI). An magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan can visualize the bone and the physis.

METHODS

We treated a series of patients with adolescent posterior SCJ injuries diagnosed on CT scan. Patients underwent an MRI scan to differentiate between a true SCJ dislocation and a PI and to further differentiate between a PI with or without residual medial end clavicular bone contact. Patients with a true SCJ dislocation and a PI with no contact underwent an open reduction and fixation. Patients with a PI with contact were treated nonoperatively with repeat CT scans at 1 and 3 months. At final follow-up SCJ clinical function was assessed using Quick-DASH, Rockwood, modified Constant, and single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) scores.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (2 female and 11 male) with an average age of 14.9 years (12 to 17) were included in the study. Twelve patients were available at final follow-up (mean 50 mo, 26 to 84). One patient had a true SCJ dislocation and 3 had an off-ended PI and were treated with an open reduction and fixation. Eight patients had a PI with residual bone contact and were treated nonoperatively. For these patients serial CT scans showed that the position was maintained, with a serial increase in callus formation and bone remodeling. The average follow-up was 42.9 months (24 to 62). At final follow-up the mean Quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) was 0.4 (0 to 2.3), Rockwood was 15, modified Constant was 98.8 (89 to 100) and SANE was 99.5% (95 to 100).

CONCLUSION

In this case series of significantly displaced adolescent posterior SCJ injuries MRI scans allowed identification of true SCJ dislocations and off-ended PIs, which were successfully treated by open reduction, and PIs with residual physeal contact which were successfully treated nonoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Additional acromioclavicular cerclage limits lateral tilt of the scapula in patients with arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

The current treatment for acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation lacks a gold standard and previous literature concludes that coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with additional AC cerclage fixation adds stability and is a useful adjunct to augment these repairs.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological value of an additional AC cerclage. It was hypothesised that an additional AC cerclage would show better clinical results. We further expected the additional AC cerclage to result in lower radiological loss of reduction compared to the technique relying on CC-fixation only.

METHODS

A total of 30 male patients with acute (less than 3 weeks) AC-dislocations Rockwood grade IV and V from 2013 to 2014 underwent arthroscopic bi-cortical CC-ligament reconstruction. Patients were assigned to a surgeon depending on the day of clinical presentation. One surgeon used only bi-cortical CC-ligament reconstruction (no-PDS group); the other surgeons used an additional PDS cerclage with an 8-loop configuration over the AC joint (PDS group). Clinical data (Constant Shoulder Score, ASES Score, DASH Score, VAS pain) were assessed 24 months post-operatively, and AP shoulder radiographs used to measure the AC and CC distances.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the Constant (Z = - 0.498, p = 0.624), ASES (Z = 0.263, p = 0.806) and DASH (Z = 1.097, p = 0.305) score as well as VAS pain (Z = 0.498, p = 0.624) were seen for both groups. Factorial ANOVA showed a significant effect of "time" [F(1,28) = 17.54, p < 0.001, r = 0.62], reflecting a significant radiological increase of AC distances over time for both groups. Comparing CC and CC + AC groups, the effect of "OP technique" was significant [F(1,28) = 4.67, p = 0.039, r = 0.38], with AC distances obtained in the PDS group being statistically lower than in the No-PDS group, whereas CC distances did not significantly increase in both groups [F(1,28) = 0.07, p = 0.791]. "Time × OP technique" interaction effects were non-significant [F(1,28) = 0.38, p = 0.545], which reflects similar changes in AC distances over time in both groups. For the CC distances, neither main nor interaction effects were significant (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both the isolated CC reconstruction and the CC reconstruction with an additional AC cerclage showed good clinical results at 2 years' follow-up. AC distances increased in both groups from the post-surgery measurement to the 2-year follow-up, but were generally lower with an additional AC cerclage. CC distances did not increase significantly over time in both groups. Therefore, the presented data suggest adding a fixation of the AC joint.

There is direct relationship between bone bridge length and coracoclavicular fixation resistance to failure: Biomechanical study in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the relation between coracoclavicular resistance to failure and the distance between clavicular tunnels. The hypothesis is that a greater clavicular bone bridge between tunnels achieves a stronger coracoclavicular fixation.

METHODS

Descriptive Laboratory Study. Thirty-six (36) coracoclavicular models were constructed utilizing porcine metatarsals. Coracoclavicular stabilizations were performed using a subcoracoid loop fixation configuration through two clavicular tunnels, tied at the clavicle's superior cortex using a locking knot. Models were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental groups of variable bone bridge length between clavicular tunnels: 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm. Each group had 12 models. Fixation resistance was assessed through the ultimate failure point under an axial load to failure trial. Failure patterns were documented. A one-way ANOVA test was used, and a Tukey post hoc as needed (P < 0.05).

FINDINGS

Mean strength per bone bridge length: 5 mm = 312 N (Range: 182-442 N); 10 mm = 430 N (Range: 368-595 N); 15 mm = 595 N (Range: 441-978 N). The 15 mm group had a significantly higher ultimate failure point than the other two groups: 5 mm (P < 0.001) and 10 mm (P < 0.001). All fixations systematically failed by a superior cortex clavicle fracture at the midpoint between tunnels.

INTERPRETATION

A direct relationship between bone bridge length and coracoclavicular resistance to failure was demonstrated, being the 15 mm length a significantly higher strength construct in a tied loop model.

Evidence-based Risk Stratification for Sport Medicine Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Orthopaedic practices have been markedly affected by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the ban on elective procedures, it is impossible to define the medical urgency of a case solely on whether a case is on an elective surgery schedule. Orthopaedic surgical procedures should consider COVID-19-associated risks and an assimilation of all available disease dependent, disease independent, and logistical information that is tailored to each patient, institution, and region. Using an evidence-based risk stratification of clinical urgency, we provide a framework for prioritization of orthopaedic sport medicine procedures that encompasses such factors. This can be used to facilitate the risk-benefit assessment of the timing and setting of a procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Early clinical results of minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction can be maintained at a minimum of five years' follow-up

AIMS

There is a lack of long-term data for minimally invasive acromioclavicular (AC) joint repair. Furthermore, it is not clear if good early clinical results can be maintained over time. The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR) and compare it to corresponding short-term data.

METHODS

We assessed patients with a follow-up of at least five years after minimally invasive flip-button repair for high-grade AC joint dislocation. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the Constant score and a questionnaire. Ultrasound determined the coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Results of the current follow-up were compared to the short-term results of the same cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients (three females, 47 males) were successfully followed up for a minimum of five years. The mean follow-up was 7.7 years (63 months to 132 months). The overall Constant score was 94.4 points (54 to 100) versus 97.7 points (83 to 100) for the contralateral side showing a significant difference for the operated shoulder (p = 0.013) The mean difference in the CC distance between the operated and the contralateral shoulder was 3.7 mm (0.2 to 7.8; p = 0.010). In total, 16% (n = 8) of patients showed recurrent instability. All these cases were performed within the first 16 months after introduction of this technique. A total of 84% (n = 42) of the patients were able to return to their previous occupations and sport activities. Comparison of short-term and long-term results revealed no significant difference for the Constant Score (p = 0.348) and the CC distance (p = 0.974).

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcome of MINAR is good to excellent after long-term follow-up and no significant differences were found compared to short-term results. We therefore suggest this is a reliable technique for surgical treatment of high-grade AC joint dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):918-924.

Acromioclavicular joint injuries in overhead athletes: a concise review of injury mechanisms, treatment options, and outcomes

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To review the relevant literature surrounding acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries particularly pertaining to overhead athletes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The AC joint is a unique anatomic and biomechanical portion of the shoulder that can be problematic for athletes, particularly throwers, when injured. Treatment of these injuries remains a topic in evolution. Low-grade injuries (Rockwood types I & II) are typically treated non-operatively while high-grade injuries (types IV, V, and VI) are considered unstable and often require operative intervention. Type III AC separations remain the most controversial and challenging as no clear treatment algorithm has been established. A wide variety of surgical techniques exist. Unfortunately, relatively little literature exists with regard to overhead athletes specifically. Treatment of AC joint injuries remains challenging, at times, particularly for overhead athletes. Operative indications and techniques are still evolving, and more research is needed specifically surrounding overhead athletes.

Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

While non-operative treatment with structured rehabilitation tends to be the strategy of choice in the management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint injury, some advocate surgical treatment to prevent persistent pain, disability, and prominence of the distal clavicle. There is no clear consensus regarding when the surgical treatment should be indicated, and successful clinical outcomes have been reported for non-operative treatment in more than 80% of type III acromioclavicular joint injuries. Furthermore, there is no gold standard procedure for operative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury, and more than 60 different procedures have been used for this purpose in clinical practice. Among these surgical techniques, recently introduced arthroscopic-assisted procedures involving a coracoclavicular suspension device are minimally invasive and have been shown to achieve successful coracoclavicular reconstruction in 80% of patients with failed conservative treatment. Taken together, currently available data indicate that successful treatment can be expected with initial conservative treatment in more than 96% of type III acromioclavicular injuries, whereas minimally invasive surgical treatments can be considered for unstable type IIIB injuries, especially in young and active patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal treatment approach in patients with higher functional needs, especially in high-level athletes.

Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Repair Through Open Ligament Transfer and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint instability is a fairly common and particularly limiting injury that may result in persistent pain and reduced quality of life. In most cases, conservative management is successful. However, in the case of a severe AC joint dislocation, surgical intervention may be warranted. Previous surgical techniques for treatment of AC joint instability include screw fixation between the coracoid and clavicle, coracoacromial ligament transfer from its acromial insertion to the clavicle, and reconstruction of the coracoacromial and/or coracoclavicular ligaments. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred technique for the treatment of a high-grade AC dislocation through coracoacromial ligament transfer to the lateral clavicle and nonabsorbable suture fixation between the coracoid process and clavicle.