Intra-Articular Distal Ulnar Sliding Osteotomy for Ulnar Shortening

Antegrade Fixation of Distal Metaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

The ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is a common procedure used to treat ulnar impaction syndrome secondary to static or dynamic ulnar-positive variance. There are many described techniques for the USO. The distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DMUSO) with retrograde cannulated screw fixation was described to reduce complications seen with other techniques. Biomechanical analysis of fixation constructs demonstrates 2-screw constructs are significantly stiffer than 1 screw and antegrade constructs have similar or greater stiffness when compared with retrograde constructs. Here, we describe a technique of antegrade cannulated screw fixation for DMUSO that obviates the need for the disruption of the distal radioulnar joint for intra-articular exposure of the ulnar head. Similar to the traditional retrograde DMUSO technique, this construct may also decrease the risk of delayed union, symptomatic implants associated with diaphyseal osteotomies, and disruption of triangular fibrocartilaginous complex in wafer procedures.

Is metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy superior to diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (MUSO) is safer for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) than diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DUSO), DUSO is widely used for UIS treatment.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of DUSO and MUSO for UIS treatment and determine the factors that should be considered when choosing surgical treatment for UIS.

METHODS

Articles comparing the effectiveness of DUSO and MUSO for UIS treatment were systematically retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The demography, incidence of complications, secondary operation rate, postoperative DASH score, wrist pain on the visual analogue scale, and grip strength improvement were also evaluated. In addition, the correlation between the improvement of grip strength and the shortening of osteotomy length of ulna was analyzed. The outcome of the patient was discontinuous, and the odds ratio, risk ratio (RR), and 95%CI were calculated and analyzed via RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

Six studies, including 83 patients receiving MUSO (experimental group) and 112 patients receiving DUSO (control group), were included in the meta-analysis. The second operation rate was significantly higher after DUSO than after MUSO. The DASH scores were slightly lower in the MUSO group than in the DUSO group. The patients receiving MUSO had slightly better pain relief effect than patients receiving DUSO. However, the incidence of complications and improvement of grip strength were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although DUSO and MUSO provide similar effects for UIS, MUSO is associated with a lower secondary operation rate, slightly lower postoperative DASH scores and slightly better pain relief effect than DUSO, indicating that MUSO can effectively be used for UIS treatment.

Distal Metaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis

PURPOSE

Ulnar shortening osteotomy can be used to treat ulnar impaction syndrome and other causes of ulnar wrist pain. Distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DMUSO) is one technique that has been proposed to reduce the complications seen with a diaphyseal USO or a wafer resection. However, to our knowledge, the optimal fixation construct for DMUSO has not been studied. We sought to characterize the biomechanical stiffness and rotational stability of different DMUSO constructs.

METHODS

A DMUSO was performed on 40 human cadaveric ulnas using 4 different fixation constructs (10 specimens per group): one 3.0 mm antegrade screw; two 2.2 mm antegrade screws; one 3.0 mm retrograde screw; and two 2.2 mm retrograde screws. Biaxial testing using axial load and cyclical axial torque was performed until failure, defined as 10° of rotation or 2 mm displacement. Specimens were assessed for stiffness at failure. Bone density was assessed using the second metacarpal cortical percentage.

RESULTS

Bone density was similar between all 4 testing groups. Of the 4 groups, the 2 antegrade screw group exhibited the highest rotational stiffness of 232 ± 102 Nm/deg. In paired analysis, this was significantly greater than 1 retrograde screw constructs. In multivariable analysis, 2-screw constructs were significantly stiffer than 1 screw and antegrade constructs were significantly stiffer than retrograde. Maximum failure torque did not differ with orientation, but 2 screws failed at significantly higher torques.

CONCLUSION

Using 2 screws for DMUSO fixation constructs may provide higher stiffness and maximum failure torque, and antegrade screw constructs may provide more stiffness than retrograde constructs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Antegrade screw fixation using 2 screws may provide the strongest construct for DMUSO. Antegrade fixation may be preferred because it avoids violating the distal radioulnar joint capsule and articular surface of the ulna.

Cold ablation robot‐guided laser osteotomy in hand, wrist and forearm surgery—A feasibility study

Introduction

Traditional bone surgery using saws and chisels is associated with direct contact of instruments with the bone causing friction, heat and pressure and hence, damaging the bone and the surrounding soft tissues.

Method

Cold ablation laser osteotomy offers new possibilities to perform corrective osteotomies in the field of bone surgery. We introduce the technology of navigated cold ablation robot‐guided laser osteotomy, present potential applications, and preliminary pre‐clinical cadaver test results in the field of hand‐, wrist‐ and forearm surgery.

Results

The cadaver tests showed first promising results for corrections in all planes and axes using different cutting patterns.

Conclusion

Cold ablation laser osteotomy seems to be a feasible new method to perform osteotomies in the field of hand‐, wrist‐ and forearm surgery. Primary osseous stability could be achieved using various cutting patterns which could lead to reduction of the amount of hardware required for osteosynthesis. Further tests are required to proof the latter and precision.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy as a treatment of symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome after malunited distal radius fractures

A malunited distal radius fracture can lead to symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome, which is a common cause for ulnar-sided wrist pain. If conservative treatment fails and symptoms persist after an arthroscopic ulnocarpal debridement, ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is the treatment of choice. Since the first USO described by Milch in 1941 after a malunited Colles fracture, many techniques have been described varying in surgical approach, type of osteotomy and osteosynthesis material used. Many studies demonstrated good to very good functional results after USO, reporting, however, a delayed union or non-union rate up to 18%. A modern, low profile, locking plate showed in our short-term study very good functional results and no implant-associated complications, in particular no non-union.