Vorolanib, an oral VEGFR/PDGFR dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors: An open-label, phase I dose escalation and dose expansion trial

CM082 suppresses hypoxia-induced retinal neovascularization in larval zebrafish

Retinal neovascularization is a common feature of several ocular neovascular diseases, which are the leading cause of blindness in the world. Current treatments are administered through invasive intravitreal injections, leading to poor patient compliance, serious ocular complications and heavy economic burdens. Thus, an alternative less or non-invasive therapeutic strategy is in demand. Here, a non-invasive oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, CM082, was evaluated in a retinal neovascularization model induced by hypoxia in zebrafish larvae. We found that CM082 effectively suppressed retinal neovascularization, rescued cell loss in the retinal ganglion cell layer, and rescued the visual function deficiency. Our results elucidated that CM082 mediated its therapeutic efficacy primarily through the inhibition of Vegfr2 phosphorylation. The findings demonstrated that CM082 possessed strong antiangiogenic effects and may serve as a potential treatment for angiogenesis in ocular neovascular diseases.

Safety and tolerability of oral vorolanib for neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration: a phase I, open-label study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral vorolanib for the treatment of neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

In the dose escalation, participants received ascending doses of oral vorolanib (25-100 mg daily). In the dose expansion, participants received recommended doses (25 and 50 mg daily).

RESULTS

Between March 15, 2015, and January 23, 2019, 41 participants were enrolled in 6 centres in China. At the data cut-off (November 14, 2019), two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during dose escalation (one in the 75 mg cohort and one in the 100 mg cohort). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 33 (80.5%) participants, and grade 3 or higher TRAEs occurred in 12 (29.3%) participants. No fatal TRAEs were observed. Increases in the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to Day 360 of +7.7 letters (range, -5-29; n = 41) were observed in participants who were administered vorolanib. Corresponding reductions in mean central subfield thickness (CST) and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) area at Day 360 were observed in these three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral administration of vorolanib improved visual outcomes in participants with nAMD with manageable systemic safety profiles.

1,3,4-Oxadiazole-naphthalene hybrids as potential VEGFR-2 inhibitors: design, synthesis, antiproliferative activity, apoptotic effect, and in silico studies

In the current work, some 1,3,4-oxadiazole-naphthalene hybrids were designed and synthesised as VEGFR-2 inhibitors. The synthesised compounds were evaluated in vitro for their antiproliferative activity against two human cancer cell lines namely, HepG-2 and MCF-7. Compounds that exhibited promising cytotoxicity (5, 8, 15, 16, 17, and 18) were further evaluated for their VEGFR-2 inhibitory activities. Compound 5 showed good antiproliferative activity against both cell lines and inhibitory effect on VEGFR-2. Besides, it induced apoptosis by 22.86% compared to 0.51% in the control (HepG2) cells. This apoptotic effect was supported by a 5.61-fold increase in the level of caspase-3 compared to the control cells. Moreover, it arrested the HepG2 cell growth mostly at the Pre-G1 phase. Several in silico studies were performed including docking, ADMET, and toxicity studies to predict binding mode against VEGFR-2 and to anticipate pharmacokinetic, drug-likeness, and toxicity of the synthesised compounds.

Phase 1b trial of anti-VEGF/PDGFR vorolanib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

Vorolanib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic properties. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability, safety and efficacy of vorolanib when added to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

We conducted a phase 1b study of vorolanib (300 or 400 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab or nivolumab using a standard 3 + 3 design to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The endpoints included safety, toxicity and objective response rate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1).

Results

Sixteen patients (9 in pembrolizumab arm, 7 in nivolumab arm) with gastrointestinal or lung cancers were enrolled. All patients had at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The most common TRAEs across all cohorts were lymphopenia (n = 7), leukopenia (n = 5), fatigue (n = 5), and alanine aminotransferase elevation (n = 5); most toxicities were grade (G) 1–2. DLTs were reported in 3 patients at vorolanib 400 mg dose level, with G3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation, G3 rectal hemorrhage, and G3 rash. Of 13 total response-evaluable patients, 2 patients had confirmed partial responses (1 rectal squamous cell cancer and 1 small cell lung cancer). Two patients achieved prolonged stable disease. Vorolanib 300 mg daily was determined to be the RP2D for either pembrolizumab or nivolumab.

Conclusion

Combination vorolanib 300 mg orally once daily plus CPI appears to be a feasible regimen with manageable toxicity and promising efficacy in select tumor types. NCT03511222. Date of Registration: April 18, 2018.