Expansion of the applicability domain for highly volatile substances on the Short Time Exposure test method and the predictive performance in assessing eye irritation potential

Development of a Defined Approach for Eye hazard identification of chemicals having surfactant properties according to the three UN GHS categories

The purpose of this study was to develop a defined approach (DA) for eye hazard identification according to the three UN GHS categories for surfactants (DASF). The DASF is based on a combination of Reconstructed human Cornea-like Epithelium test methods (OECD TG 492; EpiOcular™ EIT and SkinEthic™ HCE EIT) and the modified Short Time Exposure (STE) test method (0.5% concentration of the test substance after a 5-min exposure). DASF performance was assessed by comparing the prediction results with the historical in vivo data classification and against the criteria established by the OECD expert group on eye/skin. The DASF yielded a balanced accuracy of 80.5% and 90.9% of Cat. 1 (N = 22), 75.0% of Cat. 2 (N = 8), and 75.5% of No Cat. (N = 17) surfactants were correctly predicted. The percentage of mispredictions was below the established maximum values except for in vivo No Cat. surfactants that were over-predicted as Cat. 1 (5.6%, N = 17), with a maximum value set at 5%. The percentage of correct predictions did meet the minimum performance values of 75% Cat. 1, 50% Cat. 2, and 70% No Cat. established by the OECD experts. The DASF has shown to be successful for eye hazard identification of surfactants.

Amending the U-SENS™ skin sensitization test method for interfering auto-fluorescent chemicals

Limitations of the applicability domain of new approach methodologies (NAM) present a major challenge for the testing of cosmetic ingredients in Europe, as the regulation does not allow to resort to in vivo test method. Therefore, research focused on overcoming such limitations of established in vitro test methods is frequently conducted. Here, we address a limitation of the U-SENS™, an in vitro skin sensitization test method that addresses the key event 3 on activation of dendritic cells of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for skin sensitization. The applicability domain of the U-SENS™ excludes autofluorescent substances that can interfere with the measurement of the expression of CD86, i.e., the primary readout. An evaluation of several fluorochromes identified APC as most suitable for testing auto-fluorescent chemicals. Acceptance criteria were reproducibly met when using the APC-labelled antibody. Equivalent performance in terms of reproducibility and skin sensitisation hazard assessment of the standard FITC-labelled antibodies and the APC-labelled antibodies was demonstrated by testing 40 substances. Finally, the value of the expanded technical applicability domain was highlighted with a case study using sulfuretin. In conclusion, we successfully demonstrated the expansion of the U-SENS™ applicability domain to interfering auto-fluorescent chemicals by using APC-labelled antibodies.

Immortalized keratinocytes cells generates an effective model of Epidermal Human Equivalent for irritation and corrosion tests

Three-dimensional skin models, also named 3D skin models, human skin equivalents (HSEs), or Human Epidermal Equivalents (HEEs), have been increasingly used for chemical assessments in terms of efficacy and safety. Considering this, we developed an HEE model using immortalized HaCaT cells, aiming to overcome the limitation of primary tissue source. Our 3D model (HaCaT-HEE) exhibited important markers of cell differentiation (CK10, CK14, involucrin, and filaggrin), although the stratum corneum was shown to be modest. Besides, the model showed a good prediction potential considering membrane permeability, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in distinguishing irritant and corrosive effects after exposure to selected chemicals recommended by the OECD protocols. We also validated the formazan determination for the MTT method using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). For that, we considered carry over, linearity, reproducibility/robustness, accuracy, precision, selectivity, and matrix effect, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guideline. Based on our results, we can conclude that our model has an acceptable predictive value for the safety evaluation of compounds after skin exposure, with the great advantage of being constructed using immortalized cells.

Sanitizer aerosol-driven ocular surface disease (SADOSD)-A COVID-19 repercussion?

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an advisory for regular and thorough cleaning of hands besides other measures such as social distancing and self-isolation. The rationale for the same is to prevent the transfer of the virus from hands that have come in contact with fomites. While both alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHR) or washing with soap and water are claimed to have been effective, hand sanitizers have gained more popularity due to the ease of use. The increased frequency of ABHR use and the aerosols generated pose a potential threat to the skin and exposed mucosal surfaces, especially that of the eye due to the proximity of use. The adverse effects of alcohol in these sanitizers can be manifold. An allergic or inflammatory response can occur depending on the predisposing or preexisting conditions. This article describes the risks, underlying mechanisms, and preventive measures for sanitizer aerosol-driven ocular surface disease.