Brivaracetam single and multiple rising oral dose study in healthy Japanese participants: influence of CYP2C19 genotype

Narrative Review of Brivaracetam: Preclinical Profile and Clinical Benefits in the Treatment of Patients with Epilepsy

One third of patients with epilepsy will continue to have uncontrolled seizures despite treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs). There is therefore a need to develop novel ASMs. Brivaracetam (BRV) is an ASM that was developed in a major drug discovery program aimed at identifying selective, high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligands, the target molecule of levetiracetam. BRV binds to SV2A with 15- to 30-fold higher affinity and greater selectivity than levetiracetam. BRV has broad-spectrum antiseizure activity in animal models of epilepsy, a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, and rapid brain penetration. BRV is available in oral and intravenous formulations and can be initiated at target dose without titration. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive BRV (50-200 mg/day) treatment of focal-onset seizures was demonstrated in three pivotal phase III trials (NCT00490035/NCT00464269/NCT01261325), including in patients who had previously failed levetiracetam. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive BRV were also demonstrated in adult Asian patients with focal-onset seizures (NCT03083665). In several open-label trials (NCT00150800/NCT00175916/NCT01339559), long-term safety and tolerability of adjunctive BRV was established, with efficacy maintained for up to 14 years, with high retention rates. Evidence from daily clinical practice highlights BRV effectiveness and tolerability in specific epilepsy patient populations with high unmet needs: the elderly (≥ 65 years of age), children (< 16 years of age), patients with cognitive impairment, patients with psychiatric comorbid conditions, and patients with acquired epilepsy of specific etiologies (post-stroke epilepsy/brain tumor related epilepsy/traumatic brain injury-related epilepsy). Here, we review the preclinical profile and clinical benefits of BRV from pivotal trials and recently published evidence from daily clinical practice.

Investigating clinical pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam by using a pharmacokinetic modeling approach

The development of technology and the processing speed of computing machines have facilitated the evaluation of advanced pharmacokinetic (PK) models, making modeling processes simple and faster. The present model aims to analyze the PK of brivaracetam (BRV) in healthy and diseased populations. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to incorporate the BRV plasma concentration data and its input parameters into PK-Sim software, leading to the creation of intravenous (IV) and oral models for both populations. The developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of BRV was then assessed using the visual predictive checks, mean observed/predicted ratios (Robs/pre), and average fold error for PK parameters including the maximum systemic concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve at time 0 to t (AUC0-∞), and drug clearance (CL). The PBPK model of BRV demonstrated that mean Robs/pre ratios of the PK parameters remained within the acceptable limits when assessed against a twofold error margin. Furthermore, model predictions were carried out to assess how AUC0-∞ is affected following the administration of BRV in individuals with varying degrees of liver cirrhosis, ranging from different child-pugh (CP) scores like A, B, and C. Moreover, dose adjustments were recommended by considering the variations in Cmax and CL in various kidney disease stages (mild to severe).

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Brivaracetam in Healthy Elderly Participants

The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, safety, and tolerability of the antiseizure medication brivaracetam (BRV) were characterized in 16 healthy elderly participants (8 men/8 women) aged 65-78 years who received a single 200-mg oral dose of BRV on day 1, followed by 200 mg twice daily from day 3 until day 12. BRV and three metabolites were determined in plasma and urine. Adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, laboratory tests, general and neurological examinations, and psychometric rating scales were recorded at regular intervals. No clinically relevant changes or abnormalities were detected. The adverse events were similar to those observed in pivotal trials. Rating scales indicated transiently increased sedation and decreased alertness. BRV pharmacokinetics and metabolism were unchanged relative to younger populations. Based on our observations in this healthy elderly population receiving oral BRV 200 mg twice daily (twice the maximum recommended dose), dose reductions are not warranted relative to other, younger populations. Further investigations may be necessary in frail elderly populations aged >80 years.

A real-life pilot study of the clinical application of pharmacogenomics testing on saliva in epilepsy

Response to antiseizure medications (ASMs) can be influenced by several gene polymorphisms, causing either lower efficacy or higher occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We investigated the clinical utility of salivary pharmacogenomic testing on epilepsy patients. A commercialized pharmacogenomic salivary test was performed in a cohort of epileptic patients. Genetic variants on five genes (i.e., CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, EPHX1, and ABCB1) involved in common ASMs metabolism were selected. Twenty-one individuals (median age [Q1 -Q3 ]: 15 [6.5-28] years) were enrolled. Six patients harboring the homozygous *1F allele in CYP1A2 could have reduced chance of response to stiripentol due to fast metabolism. CYP2C9 had reduced activity in 10 patients (alleles *2 and *3), potentially affecting phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), primidone, lacosamide (LCM), and valproic acid metabolism. Seven patients, carrying the *2 allele of CYP2C19, had an increased risk of ADRs with clobazam (CLB), PB, PHT, LCM, brivaracetam; while one individual with the *17 allele in heterozygosity reported a CLB fast metabolism. Six patients showed a CC polymorphism of EPHX1 associated with the impaired efficacy of carbamazepine. ABCB1 polymorphisms related to drug-resistance (3435 CC) or drug-sensitive phenotype (CT or TT) were found in 6 out of 7 patients. Pharmacogenomic testing on saliva proved easy and safe in clinical practice to convey information for the management of epileptic patients, especially those resistant to treatment or sensitive to severe ADRs.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of brivaracetam and its interactions with rifampin based on CYP2C19 phenotypes

Brivaracetam (BRV), a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED), is primarily metabolized through amidase hydrolysis and CYP2C19-mediated hydroxylation in vivo. This study utilized physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to explore the pharmacokinetics of BRV and drug interactions between BRV and rifampin (RIF), a CYP2C19 inducer, based on CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms. A PBPK model of BRV was developed in the general population and in individuals with different CYP2C19 phenotypes by adjusting catalytic rate constants (k_cat), and the model was validated with observed clinical data. The model was then extrapolated to predict BRV steady-state plasma concentration in individuals with different CYP2C19 phenotypes, with or without coadministration of RIF. The developed model adequately described BRV exposure in the abovementioned populations. The predicted steady-state area under the curve (AUC_τ-ss) increases by 20% in heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hEMs) and 55% in poor metabolizers (PMs), compared to homozygous extensive metabolizer (EMs). When coadministered with RIF, the model predicted the most significant magnitude of drug-drug interaction (DDI) in EMs, while the exposure change of BRV was minimal in PMs. Referencing the recommended concentration for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), we concluded that the current clinical maintenance dose of BRV is acceptable regardless of CYP2C19 polymorphisms and coadministration with RIF.

Bioavailability, safety and tolerability of intravenous brivaracetam in healthy Japanese participants

We characterised the bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam 100 mg intravenous bolus and 15-min infusion versus oral reference tablet in 24 healthy Japanese participants.In this randomised, open-label, three-period crossover study, participants received three 100 mg single doses of brivaracetam, intravenous bolus, infusion, and oral tablets. Maximum plasma concentration (C_max), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC_t), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf), were compared using analysis of variance following logarithmic transformation. Bioavailability comparisons were based on the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) around the geometric least squares means ratios (intravenous:oral). Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study.The 90% CIs around AUC_t and AUC_inf ratios were entirely contained within the bioequivalence limits (0.80-1.25), but C_max was outside the limits (90% CI: 1.77-2.08 and 1.44-1.70 for intravenous bolus and infusion, respectively). All participants completed the study. Brivaracetam was well tolerated.Because response to brivaracetam in epilepsy is related to exposure (AUC), no dose adjustment is warranted when switching from oral to intravenous dosing. However, investigations are needed to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenous administration in Japanese patients with epilepsy.

Potential role of brivaracetam in pediatric epilepsy

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) that is currently approved for adjunctive treatment in patients with focal onset seizures. Similarly to levetiracetam (LEV), BRV works by binding SV2A vesicles with a high affinity and a linear pharmacokinetic profile. Retrospective studies and randomized clinical trials have already proven the efficacy of BRV, even in patients who failed treatment with LEV. Most studies about the efficacy and tolerability conducted so far were performed in adult cohorts, whereas few studies have been performed in children; however, BRV was proven to be a useful ASM for pediatric focal epilepsies, with fewer studies and conflicting results among patients with generalized epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Retention rates were high in the cohorts analyzed, and no serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in the majority of patients, with somnolence, drowsiness, irritability, aggression, and decreased appetite being the most frequently reported side effects. Although there are few original papers published on the subject so far, the analysis of the literature data demonstrated the efficacy and safety of BRV in pediatric patients, with more evidence for children aged 4-16 years with an onset of focal seizures. However, a positive response was also achieved in patients affected by encephalopathic epilepsies (eg, Jeavons' epilepsy, Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy), and ongoing studies are now testing BRV in order to widen its application to other forms of epilepsy and to test its effectiveness when used in monotherapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature surrounding the efficacy and tolerability of BRV for pediatric patients.

Brivaracetam for the treatment of focal-onset seizures: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations

INTRODUCTION

The goal of pharmacologic therapy with antiseizure medications (ASMs) is to achieve a seizure-free state with minimal side effects. About one third of patients treated with available ASMs continue to experience uncontrolled seizures. There is still need for new ASMs with enhanced effectiveness and tolerability.

AREAS COVERED

The present manuscript is based on an extensive Internet and PubMed search from 1999 to 2020. It is focused on the clinical and pharmacological properties of brivaracetam (BRV) in the treatment of epilepsy.

EXPERT OPINION

BRV is approved as add-on or monotherapy (in US) for the treatment of focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. BRV is a high affinity synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A ligand, with 15-30-fold higher affinity than levetiracetam. The selectivity of BRV may be associated with fewer clinical adverse effects. BRV shares many of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of an ideal ASMs. Additionally, BRV has a low potential for clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. Its pharmacokinetic profile makes BRV a promising agent for the treatment of status epilepticus (SE). Although BRV is not approved for the treatment of SE, it has demonstrated promising preliminary results. Further studies are needed to explore the efficacy and tolerability of BRV in SE.

Development and Validation of an UHPLC-MS/MS Assay for the Therapeutic Monitoring of Brivaracetam Plasma Concentrations in Patients with Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Brivaracetam is an antiepileptic drug used as an add-on therapy for partial-onset seizures in subjects aged 4 years and older. Owing to potential drug interactions and intersubject variability in plasma concentrations, therapeutic monitoring for brivaracetam may be useful. The aim of this study was to develop a simplified method for measuring brivaracetam plasma concentrations applicable to therapeutic drug monitoring in epilepsy.

METHODS

An ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated according to current guidelines for bioanalytical methods. Sample preparation (100 µL) involved only a simple precipitation step by acetonitrile. Brivaracetam-d7 was used as internal standard. The chromatographic analysis was performed by a Synergi Fusion column using 0.1% formic acid in water/acetonitrile as a binary gradient mobile phase, at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Both brivaracetam and the internal standard eluted at 1.01 minutes. This method was applied to measure trough and 1-hour postmorning dose brivaracetam plasma concentrations of 11 patients with epilepsy.

RESULTS

The method was validated over a concentration range of 0.10-10 mcg/mL. The mean recovery was 95%. Both intra- and inter-assay imprecision and inaccuracy were <15% for all quality control samples. The lower limit of quantitation and detection was 0.10 and 0.05 mcg/mL, respectively. No interferences or carry-over was observed. Median (25%-75% quartiles) trough and 1-hour postdosing brivaracetam plasma concentrations were 0.61 mcg/mL (0.47-0.83 mcg/mL) and 1.55 mcg/mL (1.24-2.12 mcg/mL), respectively, at a median dose of 80 mg/d (50-150 mg/d). Large, up to 8-fold, intrasubject fluctuations of brivaracetam concentrations between trough and 1-hour postdosing were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The present assay is faster and simpler than previously published analytical reports for brivaracetam in human plasma and is suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Levetiracetam and brivaracetam: a review of evidence from clinical trials and clinical experience

Until the early 1990s, a limited number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were available. Since then, a large variety of new AEDs have been developed and introduced, several of them offering new modes of action. One of these new AED families is described and reviewed in this article. Levetiracetam (LEV) and brivaracetam (BRV) are pyrrolidone derivate compounds binding at the presynaptic SV2A receptor site and are thus representative of AEDs with a unique mode of action. LEV was extensively investigated in randomized controlled trials and has a very promising efficacy both in focal and generalized epilepsies. Its pharmacokinetic profile is favorable and LEV does not undergo clinically relevant interactions. Adverse reactions comprise mainly asthenia, somnolence, and behavioral symptoms. It has now been established as a first-line antiepileptic drug. BRV has been recently introduced as an adjunct antiepileptic drug in focal epilepsy with a similarly promising pharmacokinetic profile and possibly increased tolerability concerning psychiatric adverse events. This review summarizes the essential preclinical and clinical data of LEV and BRV that is currently available and includes the experiences at a large tertiary referral epilepsy center.

Brivaracetam: a newly approved medication for epilepsy

Brivaracetam (BRV) in both the USA and EU was developed as a novel molecule for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures in patients ≥16 years of age and as of September 2017 was approved for use as monotherapy in the USA uniquely as an antiseizure medication that may be prescribed without a dose finding uptitration. This article reviews BRV's pharmacology, efficacy, safety and adverse event profiles, along with the relevant and noted regulatory hurdles in the USA and the EU. Available postmarketing data will also be summarized. Approximately 3000 patients were studied over about 9 years in the clinical trial program illustrating that BRV has efficacy at 50–200 mg/day with an acceptable adverse event profile.

Safety and Tolerability of Adjunctive Brivaracetam in Pediatric Patients < 16 Years with Epilepsy: An Open-Label Trial

OBJECTIVE

This trial evaluated the short-term safety and tolerability, steady-state pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of brivaracetam oral solution in children aged 1 month to < 16 years with epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a phase IIa, open-label, single-arm, fixed three-step dose escalation trial of 3-weeks duration (N01263; NCT00422422). Patients were taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Brivaracetam oral solution dosage, in two divided daily doses, was increased each week: approximately 0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 mg/kg/day for patients aged ≥ 8 years, and 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/kg/day for patients aged < 8 years.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients enrolled, 90 (90.0%) completed the trial. The safety population comprised 99 patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) considered drug related by the investigator were reported by 32/99 (32.3%) patients, most commonly (≥ 5%) somnolence (7.1%) and decreased appetite (6.1%). TEAEs were reported by 66/99 (66.7%) patients, most commonly (≥ 5%) convulsion, irritability, pyrexia, somnolence, and decreased appetite. In patients with a history of focal seizures with or without secondary generalization and no primary generalized seizures aged 4 to < 16 years (n = 34), drug-related TEAEs and TEAE incidences were 47.1% and 67.6%, respectively. Steady-state trough brivaracetam and brivaracetam metabolite plasma concentrations increased proportionally with dose. The ≥ 50% responder rates (all seizure types) were 21.3% (all patients, n = 80) and 36.4% (patients with focal seizures, aged 4 to < 16 years, n = 22).

CONCLUSIONS

This open-label trial in pediatric patients with epilepsy provides preliminary information that short-term, adjunctive brivaracetam treatment is well tolerated and effective. Plasma concentrations of brivaracetam and metabolites increased with increasing dose.

A Review of the New Antiepileptic Drugs for Focal-Onset Seizures in Pediatrics: Role of Extrapolation

Most antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) receive regulatory approval for children years after the drug is available in adults, encouraging off-label use of the drug in children and hindering attempts to obtain quality pediatric data in controlled trials. Extrapolating adult efficacy data to pediatrics can reduce the time between approval in adults and that in children. To extrapolate efficacy from adults to children, several assumptions must be supported, such as (1) a similar disease progression and response to interventions in adults and children, and (2) similar exposure response in adults and children. The Pediatric Epilepsy Academic Consortium for Extrapolation (PEACE) addressed these assumptions in focal-onset seizures (FOS), the most common seizure type in both adults and children. PEACE reviewed the biological and clinical evidence that supported the assumptions that children with FOS have a similar disease progression and response to intervention as adults with FOS. After age 2 years, the pathophysiological underpinnings of FOS and the biological milieu in which seizures are initiated and propagated in children, seizure semiology, electroencephalographic features, etiology and AED response to FOS in children are similar to those in adults with FOS. PEACE concluded that extrapolation of efficacy data in adults to pediatrics in FOS is supported by strong scientific and clinical evidence. However, safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) data cannot be extrapolated from adults to children. Based on extrapolation, eslicarbazepine is now approved for children with FOS, down to age 4 years. Perampanel, lacosamide and brivaracetam are now undergoing PK and safety studies for the purposes of extrapolation down to age 2 or 4 years. When done in conjunction with PK and safety investigations in children, extrapolation of adult data from adults to children can reduce the time delay between approval of effective and safe AEDs in adults and approval in children.

Reference ranges for antiepileptic drugs revisited: a practical approach to establish national guidelines

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Laboratories sometimes use different reference ranges for the same antiepileptic drug (AED), particularly for new and poorly investigated drugs. This may contribute to misunderstandings, concerns or inappropriate dose changes, which in turn may affect therapeutic effect, drug safety or treatment adherence. Therefore, the Norwegian Association of Clinical Pharmacology wished to update and harmonize the reference ranges for AEDs and establish national guidelines for Norway.

METHODS

A working group collected information on the reference ranges used by Norwegian laboratories for all commonly used AEDs. These reference ranges were compared to recent recommendations by the International League Against Epilepsy, current literature, applicable clinical studies, reference ranges used by leading Northern European epilepsy centers outside of Norway, and routine data derived from Norwegian laboratory databases.

RESULTS

Reference ranges varied between laboratories for four of 23 available AEDs (lamotrigine, valproate, eslicarbazepine and oxcarbazepine). For four AEDs (brivaracetam, perampanel, stiripentol and sulthiame), reference ranges had not previously been established. In total, 13 reference ranges were either harmonized, updated or newly established. No changes were applied to the remaining 10 AEDs.

CONCLUSION

Updated and harmonized reference ranges are now available for 22 of the 23 AEDs available in Norway. The exception is vigabatrin (reference range not applicable). Revision of reference ranges is an important part of pharmacovigilance of AEDs and must be a continuous process based on current literature and clinical experience.

A review of the pharmacology and clinical efficacy of brivaracetam

Brivaracetam (BRV; Briviact) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in adults. BRV is a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle 2A (SV2A) with 15- to 30-fold higher affinity than levetiracetam, the first AED acting on SV2A. It has high lipid solubility and rapid brain penetration, with engagement of the target molecule, SV2A, within minutes of administration. BRV has potent broad-spectrum antiepileptic activity in animal models. Phase I studies indicated BRV was well tolerated and showed a favorable pharmacokinetic profile over a wide dose range following single (10–1,000 mg) and multiple (200–800 mg/day) oral dosing. Three pivotal Phase III studies have demonstrated promising efficacy and a good safety and tolerability profile across doses of 50–200 mg/day in the adjunctive treatment of refractory focal seizures. Long-term data indicate that the response to BRV is sustained, with good tolerability and retention rate. BRV is highly effective in patients experiencing secondarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures. Safety data to date suggest a favorable psychiatric adverse effect profile in controlled studies, although limited postmarketing data are available. BRV is easy to use, with no titration and little drug–drug interaction. It can be initiated at target dose with no titration. Efficacy is seen on day 1 of oral use in a significant percentage of patients. Intravenous administration in a 2-minute bolus and 15-minute infusion is well tolerated. Here, we review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical data of BRV.

Brivaracetam: a novel antiepileptic drug for focal-onset seizures

Brivaracetam (BRV), the n-propyl analogue of levetiracetam (LEV), is the latest antiepileptic drug (AED) to be licensed in Europe and the USA for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in patients aged 16 years or older. Like LEV, BRV binds to synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), but BRV has more selective binding and a 15- to 30-fold higher binding affinity than LEV. BRV is more effective than LEV in slowing synaptic vesicle mobilization and the two AEDs may act at different binding sites or interact with different conformational states of the SV2A protein. In animal models, BRV provides protection against focal and secondary generalized seizures and has significant anticonvulsant effects in genetic models of epilepsy. The drug undergoes first-order pharmacokinetics with an elimination half-life of 7-8 h. Although BRV is metabolized extensively, the main circulating compound is unchanged BRV. Around 95% of metabolites undergo renal elimination. No dose reduction is required in renal impairment, but it is recommended that the daily dose is reduced by one-third in hepatic dysfunction that may prolong half-life. BRV has a low potential for drug interactions. The efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive BRV in adults with focal-onset seizures have been explored in six randomized, placebo-controlled studies. These showed significant efficacy outcomes for doses of 50-200 mg/day. The most common adverse events reported were headache, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue and nausea. Patients who develop psychiatric symptoms with LEV appear to be at risk of similar side effects with BRV, although preliminary data suggest that these issues are likely to be less frequent and perhaps less severe. As with all AEDs, a low starting dose and slow titration schedule help to minimize side effects and optimize seizure control and thereby quality of life.

Evaluation of brivaracetam efficacy as monotherapy in adult patients with focal seizures

Brivaracetam is a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, recently approved as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in patients 16 years of age and older with epilepsy. The goal of the present analysis was to determine if the dose-response of brivaracetam as monotherapy would fall within the range associated with brivaracetam efficacy as adjunctive therapy. An existing brivaracetam population pharmacokinetic model consisting of first-order absorption, single compartment distribution, and first-order elimination components was extended by estimating the clearance changes due to co-administration of 12 widely prescribed AEDs. Data for the population pharmacokinetic analysis originated from three Phase III add-on trials and two terminated Phase III monotherapy trials. An existing population model of daily seizure rate versus brivaracetam daily average concentration was applied to the data from the three add-on trials. Simulations allowed the assessment of the combined impact of covariate effects on both the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of brivaracetam, and indicated that in the absence of other AEDs, only marginal changes in the overall dose-response relationship would be expected. This suggests that brivaracetam can be used as monotherapy without dose modifications.

The Pharmacology and Toxicology of Third-Generation Anticonvulsant Drugs

Epilepsy is a neurologic disorder affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide, or about 0.7% of the population [1]. Thus, the use of anticonvulsant drugs in the treatment of epilepsy is common and widespread. There are three generations of anticonvulsant drugs, categorized by the year in which they were developed and released. The aim of this review is to discuss the pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and adverse events of the third generation of anticonvulsant drugs. Where available, overdose data will be included. The pharmacokinetic properties of third-generation anticonvulsant drugs include relatively fewer drug-drug interactions, as well as several unique and life-threatening adverse events. Overdose data are limited, so thorough review of adverse events and knowledge of drug mechanism will guide expectant management of future overdose cases. Reporting of these cases as they occur will be necessary to further clarify toxicity of these drugs.

Evaluation of brivaracetam: a new drug to treat epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

High prevalence of therapy-resistant epilepsy demands development of anticonvulsants with new mechanisms of action. Brivaracetam is an analogue of levetiracetam which binds to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) and decreases release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Areas covered: Relevant published studies were searched for by predefined strategy in MEDLINE, EBSCO and SCINDEKS electronic databases. Brivaracetam is effective as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in patients 16 years and older with epilepsy. It reduces baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency per week from 7.3 to 12.8% over placebo. Adverse events rate in patients with brivaracetam is not higher than in patients with placebo. Expert opinion: Brivaracetam is an important step forward in the treatment of therapy-resistant partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. Its development was systematic and targeted. Due to its efficacy and excellent safety profile, it is likely that brivaracetam will be often prescribed. In future, efficacy and safety of brivaracetam should be tested in monotherapy settings and also in the first-line therapy of partial-onset seizures.

Pharmacological interactions between brivaracetam and ethanol in healthy males

This double-blind, randomized, three-way crossover study explored the potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ethanol and brivaracetam in 18 healthy males, as required for the development of CNS-active drugs. Subjects received (A) ethanol+brivaracetam, (B) ethanol placebo+brivaracetam and (C) ethanol+brivaracetam placebo. Ethanol was infused as a 5.5-hour intravenous clamp with the first 0.5-hour as loading phase to a target level of 0.6 g/L, and brivaracetam was orally administered as a single 200 mg dose. No relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Co-administration of brivaracetam and ethanol resulted in decreased saccadic peak velocity, smooth pursuit, adaptive tracking and VAS alertness, and increased body sway, saccadic reaction time and VAS score for ethanol effect compared with brivaracetam alone or ethanol alone. Additionally, the immediate word recall scores were generally lower when brivaracetam was co-administered with ethanol, whereas the delayed word test did not show clear additional effects. A post-hoc exploratory analysis for supra-additivity suggested that most pharmacodynamic effects were likely to be additive in nature, except for adaptive tracking, which appeared to be slightly supra-additive. In conclusion, brivaracetam increased ethanol effects on psychomotor function, attention and memory in healthy males. Intake of brivaracetam with alcohol is not recommended.

Acute and long-term effects of brivaracetam and brivaracetam-diazepam combinations in an experimental model of status epilepticus

Objective

To evaluate acute and long‐term effects of intravenous brivaracetam (BRV) and BRV + diazepam (DZP) combination treatment in a rat model of self‐sustaining status epilepticus (SSSE).

Methods

Rats were treated with BRV (10 mg/kg) 10 min after initiation of perforant path stimulation (PPS) as early treatment; or BRV (10–300 mg/kg), DZP (1 mg/kg), or BRV (0.3–10 mg/kg) + DZP (1 mg/kg) 10 min after the end of PPS (established SSSE). Seizure activity was recorded electrographically for 24 h posttreatment (acute effects), and for 1 week at 6–8 weeks or 12 months' posttreatment (long‐term effects). All treatments were compared with control rats using one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni's test, or Kruskal‐–Wallis and Dunn's multiple comparison tests, when appropriate.

Results

Treatment of established SSSE with BRV (10–300 mg/kg) resulted in dose‐dependent reduction in SSSE duration and cumulative seizure time, achieving statistical significance at doses ≥100 mg/kg. Lower doses of BRV (0.3–10 mg/kg) + low‐dose DZP (1 mg/kg) significantly reduced SSSE duration and number of seizures. All control rats developed spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS) 6–8 weeks after SSSE, whereas seizure freedom was noted in 2/10, 5/10, and 6/10 rats treated with BRV 200 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg, and BRV 10 mg/kg + DZP, respectively. BRV (10–300 mg/kg) showed a dose‐dependent trend toward reduction of SRS frequency, cumulative seizure time, and spike frequency, achieving statistical significance at 300 mg/kg. Combination of BRV (10 mg/kg) + DZP significantly reduced SRS frequency, cumulative seizure time, and spike frequency. In the 12‐month follow‐up study, BRV (0.3–10 mg/kg) + low‐dose DZP markedly reduced SRS frequency, cumulative seizure time, and spike frequency, achieving statistical significance at some doses. Early treatment of SSSE with BRV 10 mg/kg significantly reduced long‐term SRS frequency.

Significance

These findings support clinical evaluation of BRV for treatment of status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures.

New developments in the management of partial-onset epilepsy: role of brivaracetam

Currently, a number of novel anticonvulsant drugs, the so-called third generation, are in various stages of development. Several of them are already available or in ongoing clinical trials. These new compounds should take advantage of new insights into the basic pathophysiology of epileptogenesis, drug metabolism and drug interactions. Many of them still need to be further evaluated mainly in real-world observational trials and registries. Among newer anticonvulsant drugs for partial-onset seizures (POSs), rufinamide, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine and perampanel are those new treatment options for which more substantial clinical evidence is currently available, both in adults and, to some extent, in children. Among the newest anticonvulsant drugs, brivaracetam, a high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, reported to be 10- to 30-fold more potent than levetiracetam, is highly effective in a broad range of experimental models of focal and generalized seizures. Unlike levetiracetam, brivaracetam does not inhibit high-voltage Ca2+ channels and AMPA receptors and appears to inhibit neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels playing a role as a partial antagonist. Brivaracetam has a linear pharmacokinetic profile, is extensively metabolized and is excreted by urine (only 8%-11% unchanged). It does not seem to influence the pharmacokinetics of other antiepileptic drugs. It was approved in the European Union in January 2016 and in the US in February 2016 as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of POS in patients older than 16 years of age. To date, its clinical efficacy as adjunctive antiepileptic treatment in adults with refractory POS at doses between 50 and 200 mg daily has been extensively assessed in two Phase IIb and four Phase III randomized controlled studies. Long-term extension studies show sustained efficacy of brivaracetam. Overall, the drug is generally well tolerated with only mild-to-moderate side effects. This is true also by intravenous route. Brivaracetam has not yet been evaluated as monotherapy or in comparison with other new anticonvulsant drugs.

Pharmacokinetic interaction of brivaracetam on carbamazepine in adult patients with epilepsy, with and without valproate co-administration

OBJECTIVE

This Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study investigated the effects of steady-state brivaracetam on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine in patients with epilepsy, with and without valproate co-administration. Valproate and brivaracetam inhibit epoxide hydrolase and increase carbamazepine epoxide levels.

METHODS

Adult patients with epilepsy being chronically treated with carbamazepine alone (n=9) or with carbamazepine and valproate (n=9) received brivaracetam during successive 1-week periods at doses of 50mg, 100mg, 200mg, and 100mg twice daily (bid). Doses of carbamazepine and valproate must have been stable for at least 3 months. Trough plasma concentrations of carbamazepine, carbamazepine epoxide, and diol metabolites were determined on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, and at the end of study visit (ESV, 2-3weeks later).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with median (range) age of 45 (20-62) years and body weight of 74 (59-124) kg were enrolled and completed the study. In patients treated with carbamazepine alone, brivaracetam dose-dependently increased mean trough levels of carbamazepine epoxide from 1.38μg/mL on Day 1 pre-dose to 2.16μg/mL (+57%) on Day 8 (50mg bid), 2.72μg/mL (+97%) on Day 15 (100mg bid), 3.02μg/mL (+119%) on Day 22 (200mg bid), 2.67μg/mL (+94%) on Day 29 (100mg bid), and 1.22μg/mL (-12%) at ESV, respectively. In patients on carbamazepine and valproate, carbamazepine epoxide increased from 1.98μg/mL at baseline to 2.72μg/mL (+37%), 3.70μg/mL (+87%), 4.43μg/mL (+124%), 3.11μg/mL (+57%), and 1.94μg/mL (-2%), respectively. There was no trend for change in carbamazepine, carbamazepine diol or valproate levels. Brivaracetam levels increased linearly with dose. Brivaracetam was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbamazepine epoxide plasma concentrations were approximately doubled by brivaracetam 100 or 200mg bid. Data are consistent with a dose-dependent and reversible inhibition of epoxide hydrolase by brivaracetam. Carbamazepine epoxide was approximately 0.7μg/mL higher in presence of valproate. There is no need to limit brivaracetam dosing when used concomitantly with carbamazepine.

Brivaracetam as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy: the current evidence base

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a novel antiepileptic drug recently licensed for the treatment of partial epilepsy in adults and adolescents over 16 years old. Like levetiracetam (LEV), it is a ligand of the synaptic vesicle protein SV2A. BRV has been shown in animal models and in studies using human brain slices to have a higher SV2A affinity and faster penetration into the brain. Its efficacy and safety have been shown in several randomized, controlled studies. The recommended initial dose is 50-100 mg, divided into two daily doses. Up-titration to a 200 mg daily dose is possible. Dizziness and somnolence are frequent side effects. There are some hints that BRV may be less frequently associated with behavioural adverse events than LEV. Long-term efficacy and safety and BRV use in special patient groups have to be assessed in the future.

Brivaracetam in the treatment of focal and idiopathic generalized epilepsies and of status epilepticus

Brivaracetam is the latest approved antiepileptic drug in focal epilepsy and exhibits high affinity as SV2A-ligand. More than two thousand patients have received brivaracetam within randomized placebo-controlled trials. Significant median seizure reduction rates of 30.5% to 53.1% for 50 mg/d, 32.5% to 37.2% for 100 mg/d and 35.6% for 200 mg/d were reported. Likewise, 50% responder rates were 32.7% to 55.8% for 50 mg/d, 36% to 38.9% for 100 mg/d and 37.8% for 200 mg/d. Overall, brivaracetam is well tolerated. The main adverse events are fatigue, dizziness, and somnolence. Immediate switch from levetiracetam to brivaracetam at a conversion ratio between 10:1 to 15:1 is feasible, and might alleviate the behavioral side effects associated with levetiracetam. Brivaracetam has the potential to perform as an important, possibly broad-spectrum AED, initially in patients with drug-refractory epilepsies. Its intravenous formulation may be a new and desirable alternative for status epilepticus, but there is so far no experience in these patients.

Brivaracetam: Rationale for discovery and preclinical profile of a selective SV2A ligand for epilepsy treatment

Despite availability of effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), many patients with epilepsy continue to experience refractory seizures and adverse events. Achievement of better seizure control and fewer side effects is key to improving quality of life. This review describes the rationale for the discovery and preclinical profile of brivaracetam (BRV), currently under regulatory review as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset seizures. The discovery of BRV was triggered by the novel mechanism of action and atypical properties of levetiracetam (LEV) in preclinical seizure and epilepsy models. LEV is associated with several mechanisms that may contribute to its antiepileptic properties and adverse effect profile. Early findings observed a moderate affinity for a unique brain-specific LEV binding site (LBS) that correlated with anticonvulsant effects in animal models of epilepsy. This provided a promising molecular target and rationale for identifying selective, high-affinity ligands for LBS with potential for improved antiepileptic properties. The later discovery that synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) was the molecular correlate of LBS confirmed the novelty of the target. A drug discovery program resulted in the identification of anticonvulsants, comprising two distinct families of high-affinity SV2A ligands possessing different pharmacologic properties. Among these, BRV differed significantly from LEV by its selective, high affinity and differential interaction with SV2A as well as a higher lipophilicity, correlating with more potent and complete seizure suppression, as well as a more rapid brain penetration in preclinical models. Initial studies in animal models also revealed BRV had a greater antiepileptogenic potential than LEV. These properties of BRV highlight its promising potential as an AED that might provide broad-spectrum efficacy, associated with a promising tolerability profile and a fast onset of action. BRV represents the first selective SV2A ligand for epilepsy treatment and may add a significant contribution to the existing armamentarium of AEDs.

Brivaracetam for the treatment of epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy fail to respond to existing medications. Levetiracetam is an effective antiepileptic drug (AED) postulated to act by binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A. Brivaracetam is a novel high affinity SV2A ligand with approximately 20-fold higher affinity for SV2A protein than levetiracetam. It is at an advanced stage of clinical development for treatment of epilepsy.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews animal data, pharmacokinetics, and phase 1-3 data of Brivaracetam treatment of epilepsy. Brivaracetam has broad-spectrum anticonvulsant activity in animal models.

EXPERT OPINION

Phase 1 studies indicated that single oral doses of 5-800 mg and repeated oral doses of up to 600 mg were well tolerated and showed favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Phase 2 studies indicated good safety and tolerability of brivaracetam in the dose range of 5-150 mg/day and provided proof of concept for efficacy in treating refractory partial onset seizures. Efficacy and safety have been evaluated in 4 phase 3 studies with dose range of 5-200 mg which have demonstrated efficacy in the range of 100-200 mg/day dose and, in most studies, also with 50 mg/day dose, and good safety and tolerability profile across 5-200 mg doses in adjunctive treatment of refractory partial onset seizures.

Brivaracetam: review of its pharmacology and potential use as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial onset seizures

Brivaracetam (BRV), a high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, reported to be 10–30-fold more potent than levetiracetam (LEV), is highly effective in a wide range of experimental models of focal and generalized seizures. BRV and LEV similarly bind to synaptic vesicle protein 2A, while differentiating for other pharmacological effects; in fact, BRV does not inhibit high voltage Ca²⁺ channels and AMPA receptors as LEV. Furthermore, BRV apparently exhibits inhibitory activity on neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels playing a role as a partial antagonist. BRV is currently waiting for approval both in the United States and the European Union as adjunctive therapy for patients with partial seizures. In patients with photosensitive epilepsy, BRV showed a dose-dependent effect in suppressing or attenuating the photoparoxysmal response. In well-controlled trials conducted to date, adjunctive BRV demonstrated efficacy and good tolerability in patients with focal epilepsy. BRV has a linear pharmacokinetic profile. BRV is extensively metabolized and excreted by urine (only 8%–11% unchanged). The metabolites of BRV are inactive, and hydrolysis of the acetamide group is the mainly involved metabolic pathway; hepatic impairment probably requires dose adjustment. BRV does not seem to influence other antiepileptic drug plasma levels. Six clinical trials have so far been completed indicating that BRV is effective in controlling seizures when used at doses between 50 and 200 mg/d. The drug is generally well-tolerated with only mild-to-moderate side effects; this is confirmed by the low discontinuation rate observed in these clinical studies. The most common side effects are related to central nervous system and include fatigue, dizziness, and somnolence; these apparently disappear during treatment. In this review, we analyzed BRV, focusing on the current evidences from experimental animal models to clinical studies with particular interest on potential use in clinical practice. Finally, pharmacological properties of BRV are summarized with a description of its pharmacokinetics, safety, and potential/known drug–drug interactions.

Effect of brivaracetam on CYP3A activity, measured by oral midazolam

Brivaracetam is a synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand in phase III development for epilepsy. A phase I, open-label, randomized study was conducted in 42 healthy male participants to assess the effect of brivaracetam on CYP3A activity using midazolam as a probe. Participants were randomized to oral brivaracetam 5, 50, or 150 mg/day from Day 8 to Day 14. A single oral dose (7.5 mg) of midazolam was administered on Days 1, 13, and 20, and full pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained. For all brivaracetam doses, the areas under the plasma concentration-time curves from 0 to infinity (AUCinf ) for midazolam and 1'-hydroxymidazolam were similar on Days 13 and 20 compared with Day 1. Following brivaracetam 150 mg/day, the Day 13/Day 1 AUCinf ratio (90% confidence interval) was 1.09 (0.97, 1.21) and 1.04 (0.93, 1.17) for midazolam and 1'-hydroxymidazolam, respectively. For the Day 20/Day 1 comparison, the corresponding AUCinf ratios were 1.10 (0.98, 1.23) and 1.07 (0.97, 1.18). Maximum midazolam plasma concentration was increased on both Day 13 and Day 20 vs. Day 1 but the relevance of this finding was unclear. This study indicates that brivaracetam up to 150 mg/day has no significant inducing or inhibiting effect on CYP3A activity.

Profile of brivaracetam and its potential in the treatment of epilepsy

Brivaracetam (BRV) (UCB 34714) is currently under review by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for approval as an add-on treatment for adult patients with partial seizures. Similar to levetiracetam (LEV), BRV acts as a high-affinity ligand of the synaptic vesicle protein 2A, however, it has been shown to be 10- to 30-fold more potent than LEV. Moreover, BRV does not share the LEV inhibitory activity on the high voltage Ca(2+) channels and AMPA receptors, and it has been reported to act as a partial antagonist on neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels. The pharmacokinetic profile of BRV is favorable and linear, and it undergoes an extensive metabolism into inactive compounds, mainly through the hydrolysis of its acetamide group. Furthermore, it does not significantly interact with other antiepileptic drugs and more than 95% is excreted through the urine, with an unchanged fraction of 8%-11%. BRV has a half-life of approximately 8-9 hours and it is usually given twice daily. To date, a wide range of experimental studies have reported the effectiveness of BRV with regards to partial and generalized seizures. In humans, six randomized, placebo-controlled trials and two meta-analyses highlighted the efficacy, or good tolerability, of BRV as an add-on treatment for patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. A wide dose range of BRV has been evaluated in those trials (5-200 mg), but the most suitable for clinical use appears to be 50-100 mg/day. The most common adverse reactions to BRV are mild to moderate, transient, often improve during the course of the treatment, and mainly consist of central nervous system symptoms, such as fatigue, dizziness, and somnolence. The aim of this paper is to critically review the literature data regarding experimental animal models and clinical trials on BRV, and to define its potential usefulness for the clinicians who manage patients with epilepsy.