Itinerary profiling to analyze a large number of protein-folding trajectories

Effect of Main and Side Chains on the Folding Mechanism of the Trp-Cage Miniprotein

Proteins that do not fold into their functional native state have been linked to diseases. In this study, the influence of the main and side chains of individual amino acids on the folding of the tryptophan cage (Trp-cage), a designed 20-residue miniprotein, was analyzed. For this purpose, we calculated the solvation free energy (SFE) contributions of individual atoms by using the 3D-reference interaction site model with the atomic decomposition method. The mechanism by which the Trp-cage is stabilized during the folding process was examined by calculating the total energy, which is the sum of the conformational energy and SFE. The folding process of the Trp-cage resulted in a stable native state, with a total energy that was 62.4 kcal/mol lower than that of the unfolded state. The solvation entropy, which is considered to be responsible for the hydrophobic effect, contributed 31.3 kcal/mol to structural stabilization. In other words, the contribution of the solvation entropy accounted for approximately half of the total contribution to Trp-cage folding. The hydrophobic core centered on Trp6 contributed 15.6 kcal/mol to the total energy, whereas the solvation entropy contribution was 6.3 kcal/mol. The salt bridge formed by the hydrophilic side chains of Asp9 and Arg16 contributed 10.9 and 5.0 kcal/mol, respectively. This indicates that not only the hydrophobic core but also the salt bridge of the hydrophilic side chains gain solvation entropy and contribute to stabilizing the native structure of the Trp-cage.

Prediction of chaperonin GroE substrates using small structural patterns of proteins

Molecular chaperones are indispensable proteins that assist the folding of aggregation-prone proteins into their functional native states, thereby maintaining organized cellular systems. Two of the best-characterized chaperones are the Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES (GroE), for which in vivo obligate substrates have been identified by proteome-wide experiments. These substrates comprise various proteins but exhibit remarkable structural features. They include a number of α/β proteins, particularly those adopting the TIM β/α barrel fold. This observation led us to speculate that GroE obligate substrates share a structural motif. Based on this hypothesis, we exhaustively compared substrate structures with the MICAN alignment tool, which detects common structural patterns while ignoring the connectivity or orientation of secondary structural elements. We selected four (or five) substructures with hydrophobic indices that were mostly included in substrates and excluded in others, and developed a GroE obligate substrate discriminator. The substructures are structurally similar and superimposable on the 2-layer 2α4β sandwich, the most popular protein substructure, implying that targeting this structural pattern is a useful strategy for GroE to assist numerous proteins. Seventeen false positives predicted by our methods were experimentally examined using GroE-depleted cells, and 9 proteins were confirmed to be novel GroE obligate substrates. Together, these results demonstrate the utility of our common substructure hypothesis and prediction method.