Survival and glycemic control in patients with coexisting lymphoma and diabetes: a case-control analysis

Cancer, diabetes, survival and glycemic control: a large multisite analysis

Aim

To determine overall survival (OS) and glycemic control in patients with cancer and diabetes.

Materials & methods

Patients of our institution with breast, colon, lung, pancreas and prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. OS was compared between matched patients with and without diabetes, and changes in glucose value over time were assessed.

Results

For 3934 patients each with and without diabetes, adjusted analysis showed no difference in OS according to diabetes status (hazard ratio: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.96-1.20). Mean glucose values decreased over time in patients with and without diabetes (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

In this large study of patients with five common cancers, the co-occurrence of diabetes did not affect OS. Cancer did not adversely affect glucose levels.

Survival and glycemic control in patients with co-existing squamous cell carcinoma and diabetes mellitus

Aim:

This study examined the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on survival in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients, and the impact of SCC on glycemic control.

Materials & methods:

Patients with newly diagnosed SCC with and without DM were matched 1:1 (2007–2017). Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) and glucose level during the year following cancer diagnosis were compared using mixed models.

Results:

HbA_1c decreased over time in DM patients (p = 0.04). The 5-year overall survival was 61% in DM patients, compared with 78% in patients without DM (p = 0.004).

Conclusion:

The presence of co-existing DM adversely impacted survival in patients with SCC. SCC did not affect glycemic control.

The objective of this study was to identify the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and to determine whether SCC and its treatment affected glycemic control. We used an institutional cancer registry to identify 190 patients with SCC and grouped them by the presence (n = 95) or absence (n = 95) of DM. Patients were matched by age and year of SCC diagnosis. For individuals with SCC, DM did decrease survival rates, and the diagnosis of SCC did not affect glycemic control.