Possible drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome after exposure to epoetin alfa

Retrospective analysis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome: a study of 27 patients

BACKGROUND

Previous reports regarding the characteristics of patients with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) are mostly limited to small case reports and drug-specific case series, mainly involving Caucasian patients.

OBJECTIVE

We describe the trends in the clinical presentation and laboratory findings of our patients with DIHS and their response to therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series. Clinical records of patients treated in the Department of Dermatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, with a diagnosis of DIHS from January 2003 to January 2008 were retrieved and analyzed.

RESULTS

In all, 27 patients were analyzed. The 3 most consistent features in our patients were 1) history of drug exposure (100%); 2) a morbilliform cutaneous eruption in 81.5% of the patients; and 3) systemic involvement with hepatitis (96.3%), hematologic abnormalities (81.5%), and fever (77.8%) being most common. Superficial perivascular dermatitis was the most common skin biopsy specimen findings, with tissue eosinophilia occurring in half the biopsy specimens. Severe complications included renal failure requiring dialysis in two patients and hyperthyroidism and myocarditis occurring in one patient.

LIMITATIONS

This is a retrospective study with a small number of patients during a 5-year period. We did not routinely document the presence of lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly in our patient's records. We do not measure viral serologies routinely as part of the workup for DIHS.

CONCLUSION

DIHS is not uncommon. The presentation in an Asian population is similar to published studies. Treatment includes discontinuation of the offending drug, monitoring for organ involvement, and using systemic steroids.

Hypersensitivity reactions to biological agents with special emphasis on tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several biological agents have been introduced into the drug market and more are emerging. Adverse reactions to these agents have recently been classified into five different subtypes. Some of these reactions are frequent but without consequences for the patients. Others are less frequent but potentially life-threatening, and they include allergic reactions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypersensitivity reactions are well described adverse drug reactions, corresponding to the ss-type of the newly proposed classification of adverse reactions induced by biological agents. We focus our search on tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists, as they represent a dramatic improvement in the therapy of both rheumatic and inflammatory bowel diseases and because adverse reactions have been closely scrutinized. We also add cases from our own experience. We found very few properly documented allergic reactions.

SUMMARY

Hypersensitivity reactions to tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists are not rare. Whether these manifestations have to be considered type beta or type gamma reactions is still a matter of debate. There is a need for allergological tests in vivo and in vitro.