Potential drug-drug interactions with antiepileptic drugs in Medicaid recipients

Effect of Chronic Administration of 5-(3-chlorophenyl)-4-Hexyl-2,4 -Dihydro-3H-1,2,4-Triazole-3-Thione (TP-315)-A New Anticonvulsant Drug Candidate-On Living Organisms

About 70 million people suffer from epilepsy—a chronic neurodegenerative disease. In most cases, the cause of the disease is unknown, but epilepsy can also develop as the result of a stroke, trauma to the brain, or the use of psychotropic substances. The treatment of epilepsy is mainly based on the administration of anticonvulsants, which the patient must most often use throughout their life. Despite significant progress in research on antiepileptic drugs, about 30% of patients still have drug-resistant epilepsy, which is insensitive to pharmacotherapy used so far. In our recent studies, we have shown that 4-alkyl-5-aryl-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones act on the voltage-gated sodium channels and exhibit anticonvulsant activity in an MES (maximal electroshock-induced seizure) and 6Hz test in mice. Previous studies have shown their beneficial toxic and pharmacological profile, but their effect on a living organism during chronic use is still unknown. In the presented study, on the basis of the previously conducted tests and the PAMPA (parallel artificial membrane permeability assay) BBB (blood–brain barrier) test, we selected one 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivative—TP-315—for further studies aimed at assessing the impact of its chronic use on a living organism. After long-term administration of TP-315 to Albino Swiss mice, its effect on the functional parameters of internal organs was assessed by performing biochemical, morphological, and histopathological examinations. It was also determined whether the tested compound inhibits selected isoforms of the CYP450 enzyme system. On the basis of the conducted tests, it was found that TP-315 does not show nephrotoxic nor hepatotoxic effects and does not cause changes in hematological parameters. In vitro tests showed that TP-315 did not inhibit CYP2B6, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, or CYP3A5 enzymes at the concentration found in the serum of mice subjected to long-term exposure to this compound.

Economic impact of potential CYP450 pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions among chronic low back pain patients taking opioids

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients who take at least 1 CYP450-metabolized opioid analgesic agent concurrent with at least 1 other CYP450-metabolized medication experience a drug-drug exposure (DDE), which puts them at risk for a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction (PK DDI). This study compared utilization of healthcare resources and associated payments in cLBP patients with and without incident DDEs with the potential to cause PK DDIs. A retrospective database analysis examined the associated clinical events, healthcare utilization (measured in terms of claims for office visits, outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalization), and cost to the health plan, as defined as the sum of health plan payments for resources used. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts by age (those under 65 and those 65 years and over). In the 6 months after exposure, total healthcare payments were significantly higher for DDE patients than those without DDEs (no-DDE), in both in the younger ($7,086, SD = $8,370) and $6,353, SD = $8,352, respectively, P < 0.001) and the older cohorts ($7,806 vs. $7,043, respectively, P = 0.013). Younger and older patients with DDE had significantly higher prescription payments than those without DDE ($2,041, SD = $2,706 vs. $1,565, SD = $2,349, respectively, P < 0.001 for younger and $2,482, SD = $2,481 vs. $2,286, SD = $2,521, respectively, P = 0.044 for older patients). Both older and younger patients with DDE had significantly more claims for office visits and higher associated payments than similar patients without DDE. Patients in the study who experienced DDEs that placed them at risk for PK DDIs had significantly greater utilization rates of healthcare resources and higher associated payments in the 6-month observation period following exposure.

Economic impact of potential drug-drug interactions in opioid analgesics

OBJECTIVE

Patients managing chronic non-cancer pain with cytochrome P450 (CYP450)-metabolized opioid analgesics who concurrently take another CYP450-metabolized medication experience a drug-drug exposure (DDE), which puts them at risk for a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction (PK DDI). This study examined the economic impact of incident DDEs with the potential to cause PK DDIs compared to similar patients without such exposure.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective analysis used paid claims from a large, commercially insured population during January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2008.

METHODS

Propensity matching was used to control for baseline differences in comparisons between 85,043 exposed and 85,043 non-exposed patients.

RESULTS

Comparisons yielded mean total costs 6 months after the DDEs that were significantly higher in subjects with DDE versus matched subjects without DDE [$8165 (SD $11,357) vs. $7498 (SD $11,668), respectively, p<0.01] resulting in a difference of $667. This was driven by medical costs [$5520 (SD $10,505) vs. $5222 (SD $10,689), respectively, p<0.01] a $298 difference, and total prescription costs [$2646 (SD $3262) vs. $2276 (SD $3907), respectively, p<0.01] a $369 difference.

LIMITATIONS

The study design demonstrates associations only and cannot establish causal relationships. Further, relevant DDEs were not included if concurrent consumption occurred outside the index period and when CYP450 substances were consumed that are not reflected in pharmacy claims (herbals, over-the-counter medications).

CONCLUSION

Since concurrent exposure to DDEs with the potential to cause PK DDIs may be relatively common, policy decisions-makers should consider the use of long-acting opioids that are not metabolized through the CYP450 pathway.

Antiepileptic drugs and other medications: what interactions may arise?

Many patients with epilepsy are on lifelong therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and AEDs are used for other conditions such as mood stabilization and headache prophylaxis. These drugs have high potential for clinically significant interaction with nonepilepsy drugs. Interactions occur largely through altered pharmacokinetics. One drug may increase the hepatic clearance of another, leading to attenuated efficacy of the affected drug. Alternatively, inhibition of liver metabolism by one drug can cause acute toxicity by reducing clearance of another drug. To identify potential drug interactions before they lead to toxicity or therapy failure, the treating clinician should combine knowledge of the patient's overall history with a general knowledge of comorbid conditions in which significant interactions involving AEDs are most likely to occur. Treatments susceptible to interactions include anticoagulants, antiarrhythmics, antibiotics, antiretroviral drugs, immunosuppressives, antineoplastics, and contraceptives. Therefore, it is important to obtain periodically a thorough history of medical problems, use of medications or herbal remedies, and adverse effects of medications. Physicians managing epilepsy patients should also strive to avoid potential drug interactions by favoring low-interaction AEDs in patients taking many other types of drugs. There is quite a large degree of patient heterogeneity in the extent of any given interaction between an AED and another drug. Indeed, some groups of patients may have different susceptibilities to such interactions because of genetic and environmental influences on drug metabolism. Effective treatment with AEDs should include attention to drug interactions.