Pregnant and bleeding: A model to assess factors associated with the need for emergency care in early pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of Critical or Emergent patient classification among pregnant patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) and to identify characteristics that discriminate between patients requiring Emergency care from those who can be safely triaged to the ambulatory setting.

STUDY DESIGN

In this cross-sectional study conducted in 3 urban EDs, patients under 16 weeks gestation who presented with bleeding and/or cramping completed a 7-item questionnaire. We compared baseline clinical variables and survey responses among patients classified as Critical or Emergent per the American Board of Emergency Medicine's patient acuity definitions with those classified as Lower Acuity to identify independent risk factors for outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 484 participants, 21 (4.3%) were classified as Critical or Emergent and required interventions. While no demographic characteristics differentiated Critical patients from Lower Acuity patients, survey questions associated with a higher likelihood of emergency intervention included history of prior ectopic pregnancy (OR 8.7, 95% CI 3.2-23.5) heavy bleeding in the past two hours (OR 11.8, 95% CI 3.8-36.1), as well as having made a prior ED visit in the current pregnancy (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.7-5.1). Joint consideration of these risk factors in a multivariable model performed well at discriminating between Critical and Lower Acuity patients with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.93).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a history of ectopic pregnancy, heavy bleeding in the past two hours, and/or prior presentation to the ED in the current pregnancy had the highest risk of needing emergency-level care. The vast majority of patients presenting to the ED with early pregnancy complaints were discharged without intervention.

Women's Experiences of Miscarriage in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION

Miscarriage is a common event, usually managed in the emergency department. Although studies have examined the impact of miscarriage on women's mental health and the effects of their dissatisfaction with health care received, little is known about the characteristics of the miscarriage experience in the emergency department. The objective of this study was to identify characteristics of care management that may have contributed to the difficulties experienced by women presenting with miscarriage in the emergency department.

METHODS

Forty-eight women treated at 4 emergency departments in different regions of Quebec, Canada, were interviewed for 60 to 90 minutes. A thematic qualitative analysis of these interviews was performed.

RESULTS

Analyses revealed that participants' experiences were characterized particularly by a lack of information at 3 critical junctures of the miscarriage experience: the announcement of the miscarriage, the course of the miscarriage, and the ED discharge. The topics on which the women lacked information were categorized into 7 subthemes within these junctures.

DISCUSSION

Lack of information throughout the care management of miscarriage exacerbated the already-difficult nature of this event for the participants. Training emergency nurses to give adequate and complete information enables the delivery of compassionate care, potentially making a difficult situation less traumatic.

Check the Head: Emergency Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fetal Anencephaly

Background

Early pregnancy complaints in emergency medicine are common. Emergency physicians (EP) increasingly employ ultrasound (US) in the evaluation of these complaints. As a result, it is likely that rare and important diagnoses will be encountered. We report a case of fetal anencephaly diagnosed by bedside emergency US in a patient presenting with first-trimester vaginal bleeding.

Case Report

A 33-year-old patient at 10 weeks gestation presented with vaginal bleeding. After initial history and physical examination, a bedside US was performed. The EP noted the abnormal appearance of the fetal cranium and anencephaly was suspected. This finding was confirmed by a consultative high-resolution fetal US. Making the diagnosis at the point of care allowed earlier detection and more comprehensive maternal counseling about pregnancy options. This particular patient underwent elective abortion which was able to be performed at an earlier gestation, thus decreasing maternal risk. If this diagnosis would not have been recognized by the EP at the point of care, it may not have been diagnosed until the second trimester, and lower-risk maternal options would not have been available.